From tom at ispstuff.com Fri Dec 1 09:03:59 2000 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Max 4048 and Max 1800 - Cheap! Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20001201090359.026f5a68@mail.icd.com> Max Ascend 4048 with ISDN/FR/DC in excellent condition. Includes 3 - 16 port 56k modem cards - $4100. 2 available - newer serial numbers. Ready to support 2 CT1s or PRIs for up to 48 v.90 connections and ISDN. Max Ascend 1800 with ISDN/FR/DC in excellent condition. $795. 1 available - newer serial number. Makes a great ISDN BRI-U 8 port RAS. 16 port Modem card can be added for 16 v.90 ports. All fully tested, set to factory defaults, and guaranteed. 815-968-9888 or reply by email. Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From mlevans at blacksburg.net Mon Dec 4 06:12:01 2000 From: mlevans at blacksburg.net (Lyle Evans) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: rackmount brackets (rackears) for Ascend & other equipment Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20001204071201.00ac7b40@pop.blacksburg.net> We are selling rackear kits for Ascend 4xxx, Ascend 6xxx and Ascend 1800, We are also selling generic rackears kits for rackmount equipment, in 1U to 6U sizes, and rackears for some models of Cisco, 3com and other brands of networking equipment. Prices range from $23.00 to $50.00 per pair, depending on model plus $7.00 handling per order. For further information and to order please visit: http://www.rackears.com/ Thank you, Lyle Evans lyle@rackears.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From nicks at albury.net.au Mon Dec 4 22:54:40 2000 From: nicks at albury.net.au (Nick Slager) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DoV on MAX 4xxx Message-ID: <20001205155440.B15170@albury.net.au> I'm looking at implementing DoV (Data Over Voice) on our MAX 4000 units, but finding setup information a little thin on the ground. I gather I need to setup a new profile with a different dial in number, in order to support both standard analog modem users and DoV users. Has anyone got pointers to what else has to be done? What's the minimum TAOS version required? Pointers appreciated. Thanks, Nick -- From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680): "Workaround: don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey." ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From maxed_out_user at hotmail.com Tue Dec 5 02:42:40 2000 From: maxed_out_user at hotmail.com (Max User) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) DoV on MAX 4xxx Message-ID: All that is necessary for DOV to work is: 1) You need to make sure that the ISDN voice channel of the user dialing in is truly going through an all digital path (i.e. no digital to analog back to digital conversion). This is not the case with some telcos, but I doubt any one telco guy will know where calls traverse throughout the telco network, so you will just have to have the user give it a shot and hope it works. 2) You will need to route a voice call to the HDLC drivers of the Max (i.e. the Etherdata port where ISDN digital calls normally terminate) and not to the digital modem slot cards (which is where you normally route a true voice call carrying client modem signals to). You can either have telco assign another DNIS number for this line and then you can configure Answer Number routing under Ethernet->Wan Options->Answer #1... Or if you have T-1 line (not a PRI), you can make sure that certain voice calls coming into certain channels (the ones dedicated for DOV) be configured to go to slot 9 (the Etherdata slot). Hope this helps. I'm looking at implementing DoV (Data Over Voice) on our MAX 4000 units, but finding setup information a little thin on the ground. I gather I need to setup a new profile with a different dial in number, in order to support both standard analog modem users and DoV users. Has anyone got pointers to what else has to be done? What's the minimum TAOS version required? Pointers appreciated. Thanks, Nick _____________________________________________________________________________________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ascend at saffron.colloquium.co.uk Wed Dec 6 10:08:27 2000 From: ascend at saffron.colloquium.co.uk (ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco Message-ID: <200012061608.QAA02315@saffron.colloquium.co.uk> Hi; Thanks again, everyone, for your help - unfortunately, things still aren't working quite right. To recap, what we're trying to do is get a Cisco 1603R connecting to an Ascend Max 4000 via ISDN. When negotiating a normal PPP connection (ie single channel) everything works fine - it dials up, authenticates, you get the transfer rates you'd expect, and when idle timeout is reached the line drops. However, when we enable multilink, and it negotiates an MPP connection, the following is happening. Everything appears to work at first - first, one channel comes up and then, as demand rises, the other. However, when the idle timeout has been reached, something goes wrong. The Cisco thinks it has dropped the channel, or channels, but on our Ascend, the user still shows up as connected even though the link light(s) on the Cisco have gone out. What this means is that when the two channels are brought up, they don't go back down again ever at our end, thus preventing all future connections from this user until we power-cycle the Cisco, or kick the session off the Ascend. I've tried the config file sample that Troy provided, and the username fix that Craig suggested, but to no avail. When both channels are up they function perfectly, with the transfer rates/ping times one would expect - it's just when it comes time for the channels to drop after idle timeout that everything goes horribly wrong. If anyone has any ideas, I'd be very grateful. Cheers; Kevin Drysdale, Colloquium Internet Technical Support. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at aobe.com Wed Dec 6 01:23:00 2000 From: scott at aobe.com (Scott Starbuck) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco References: <200012061608.QAA02315@saffron.colloquium.co.uk> Message-ID: <3A2DE954.36C6732D@aobe.com> Hi Kevin, I haven't really followed the rest of the thread, but one thing caught my eye. You mention an MPP connection - this is Ascend's proprietary Multilink Protocol, when attempting a multi-link connection with another vendor's equipment you should use MP instead of MPP. I know all this is supposed to "fall back, re-negotiate, and automatically work" but many times different vendors products negotiate incompatibly. The fact that you have a problem upon disconnecting seems to point to some issue like this, as the MPP handles adding and subtracting bandwith differently than MP - the channel addition may work ok, but something is happening upon disconnect that one or the other router doesn't understand.. I have also seen where using compression has created problems. This would seem to be unrelated but incompatabilities in compression have created connection problems as it's one of the parameters negotiated setting up a connection. I'm not sure if any compression negotiation happens when a channel disconnects though. Good luck, Scott Starbuck Aobe Network Group ----------------------- ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk wrote: > Hi; > > Thanks again, everyone, for your help - unfortunately, things still aren't working quite right. To recap, what we're trying to do is get a Cisco 1603R connecting to an Ascend Max 4000 via ISDN. When negotiating a normal PPP connection (ie single channel) everything works fine - it dials up, authenticates, you get the transfer rates you'd expect, and when idle timeout is reached the line drops. However, when we enable multilink, and it negotiates an MPP connection, the following is happening. > > Everything appears to work at first - first, one channel comes up and then, as demand rises, the other. However, when the idle timeout has been reached, something goes wrong. The Cisco thinks it has dropped the channel, or channels, but on our Ascend, the user still shows up as connected even though the link light(s) on the Cisco have gone out. What this means is that when the two channels are brought up, they don't go back down again ever at our end, thus preventing all future connections from this user until we power-cycle the Cisco, or kick the session off the Ascend. > > I've tried the config file sample that Troy provided, and the username fix that Craig suggested, but to no avail. When both channels are up they function perfectly, with the transfer rates/ping times one would expect - it's just when it comes time for the channels to drop after idle timeout that everything goes horribly wrong. > > If anyone has any ideas, I'd be very grateful. > > Cheers; > Kevin Drysdale, Colloquium Internet Technical Support. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Thu Dec 7 05:15:53 2000 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco In-Reply-To: <200012061608.QAA02315@saffron.colloquium.co.uk> Message-ID: Having re-read your last post, and this one, I'm curious. Do you have more than one ascend terminating your huntgroup? If so, is stacking properly configured? Also, what does the user's radius profile look like? Are you setting Ascend-Maximum-Channels=2 ? Also, are you setting the protocol via radius, or are you letting the 2 routers figure it out for themselves? I've found that I don't have to set the protocol (check for ppp, but don't force it). Anyways, just a couple more thoughts for ya, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk ** Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:08 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco ** ** ** Hi; ** ** Thanks again, everyone, for your help - unfortunately, things ** still aren't working quite right. To recap, what we're trying ** to do is get a Cisco 1603R connecting to an Ascend Max 4000 via ** ISDN. When negotiating a normal PPP connection (ie single ** channel) everything works fine - it dials up, authenticates, you ** get the transfer rates you'd expect, and when idle timeout is ** reached the line drops. However, when we enable multilink, and ** it negotiates an MPP connection, the following is happening. ** ** Everything appears to work at first - first, one channel comes ** up and then, as demand rises, the other. However, when the idle ** timeout has been reached, something goes wrong. The Cisco ** thinks it has dropped the channel, or channels, but on our ** Ascend, the user still shows up as connected even though the ** link light(s) on the Cisco have gone out. What this means is ** that when the two channels are brought up, they don't go back ** down again ever at our end, thus preventing all future ** connections from this user until we power-cycle the Cisco, or ** kick the session off the Ascend. ** ** I've tried the config file sample that Troy provided, and the ** username fix that Craig suggested, but to no avail. When both ** channels are up they function perfectly, with the transfer ** rates/ping times one would expect - it's just when it comes time ** for the channels to drop after idle timeout that everything goes ** horribly wrong. ** ** If anyone has any ideas, I'd be very grateful. ** ** Cheers; ** Kevin Drysdale, Colloquium Internet Technical Support. ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From doc at datacruz.com Thu Dec 7 09:56:08 2000 From: doc at datacruz.com (Craig Norborg) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco In-Reply-To: <200012070645.WAA15577@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001207104313.01df2ef8@pop.datacruz.com> At 01:45 AM 12/7/2000, you wrote: >Subject: (ASCEND) Re: Ascend and a Cisco > >I've tried the config file sample that Troy provided, and the username fix >that Craig suggested, but to no avail. When both channels are up they >function perfectly, with the transfer rates/ping times one would expect - >it's just when it comes time for the channels to drop after idle timeout >that everything goes horribly wrong. Ok, here is my complete config for a host that is currently working fine, single or dual. It is a 1605R router using 2 ethernet adapters and networks, but that shouldn't matter... Besides the multiple "username" statements, I pretty much used Cisco's autoconfig to do this. One quirk that I hadn't noticed which I normally wouldn't do is that the "hostname" is the login ID and the ENABLEPASSWORD is the same as the LOGINPASSWORD. You should be able to eliminate this with another "username" prompt if you care enough... All I know is that Cisco's PAP/CHAP scheme is broken enough that if I have something working, I don't touch it... Took me over a year (admittedly I didn't press it) with Cisco's TAC trying to get a working config to finally have a local Cisco Guru to trace down the PAP/CHAP stuff and tell me to use the various username prompts... Maybe if enough of you guys complain to Cisco they'll fix it? They acted like they didn't have a problem with anyone elses equipment, but I've only had trouble with theirs. The ascend stuff works great with everyone else... We have a bunch of older P50's (won't use the newest OS's) that we're able to sell our clients for $250 (if anyone out there wants one for $150, write me) and they never have problems with them... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname HOSTNAME ! enable password ENABLEPASSWORD ! username ts1 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD username ts2 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD username ts3 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD username ts4 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD username ts5 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD username ts6 password 0 LOGINPASSWORD ip subnet-zero ip name-server DNSSERVER1 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 description connected to Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip proxy-arp ip nat inside ! interface Ethernet1 description connected to Ethernet 1 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip proxy-arp ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 description connected to Internet ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 1800 dialer string PHONENUMBER dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 100 either dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 SPID1 DNUM1 isdn spid2 SPID2 DNUM2 isdn incoming-voice modem no cdp enable ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp multilink hold-queue 75 in ! router rip version 2 network 192.168.1.0 network 192.168.2.0 no auto-summary ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BRI0 ! ! map-class dialer DialClass ! map-class dialer dialclass access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 1 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 snmp-server community public RO ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password CONPASSWD login transport input none line vty 0 4 password CONPASSWD login ! end ----- Craig Norborg - CCNA/CCDA/CSE/MCSE 219.254.5254 Datacruz, Inc. FAX 219.256.1144 doc@datacruz.com Official Tucows Affiliate 2500 Miracle Lane, Suite D . PO Box 220 . Mishawaka . IN . 46546-0220 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Thu Dec 7 11:29:15 2000 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: MAX TNT refresh problem In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20001207105804.00a442f0@mail.datatie.fi> References: <5.0.0.25.2.20001207105804.00a442f0@mail.datatie.fi> Message-ID: >When I set TNT System:permconn-update... = changed, and do that >refresh -a, all changed ATM connections will be put down and new >profiles asked from radius. After refresh, there are none of those >changed ATM connections up!. So, I do refresh -a command again and >then one or more connections are up. >If I delete a permconn profile, it is still left in TNT even after >refresh -a command. > >---------- >From: "emea" > >I have done a Lab Test trying to reproduce your problem with the >command refresh -a. The result is that I found a similar problem to >the one described in the case. So I escalate the case and if finally >the bug is confirmed It will be raised a CR by Engineering. >Either me or someone from the Escalation department will contact you shortly. Mmm-hmm. I wonder if that case is 3038679, which I opened back in April 2000 on various problems with RADIUS on the DSL Terminator 100, including severe problems when permconn-update... = changed. At this rate, you shouldn't have to wait beyond, say, the end of 2001 for a fix. :-( -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Edwin_Everett at cargill.com Thu Dec 7 16:07:48 2000 From: Edwin_Everett at cargill.com (Edwin_Everett@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 3000 Message-ID: I would like to hear from anyone out there that has deployed the Max 3000 model. What are its current strengths and weaknesses? Buggy? Please let me know. We are considering it to get past the 8.X TAOS hurdle for many 1800s and 2000s... Thanks Edwin Everett -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BDY.RTF Type: application/rtf Size: 574 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20001207/685d5f64/BDY.rtf From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Thu Dec 7 17:07:41 2000 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MX-SL-16MOD-S56 Message-ID: <010501c060a2$c3e4e3e0$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> Hello all, We have available several MAX4048's configured with 3 MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards in them. Fully tested and warranted. Also we have a lot of spare cards available for sale as well. Please email me offline if interested. (References available) Regards, Scott Woodland Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 4 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20001207/5e176a0f/attachment.html From troy at psknet.com Thu Dec 7 17:30:10 2000 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Edwin, You may want to consider getting away from whatever mail client you're using, or at least configure it to send mail in plain text format. Most folks on most lists would appreciate it. About the max 3000. I've no direct experience, but it's probably as solid as the rest of the Ascend line. It has the 100Mbit ethernet port, which I would imagine is as buggy as the 6000 chassis. It works, but in my experience, it doesn't like some hubs and switches. Works great with my cisco stuff though. As for getting up to the 8.x code. Why? i'm still at 7.0.26, and my maxes work flawlessly. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > Edwin_Everett@cargill.com > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:08 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Cc: ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 3000 > > << File: BDY.RTF >> << File: BDY.RTF >> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 2436 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20001207/eecdcc9c/winmail.bin From Edwin_Everett at cargill.com Thu Dec 7 19:34:01 2000 From: Edwin_Everett at cargill.com (Edwin_Everett@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 Message-ID: Hows this.....it was set to Rich Text.....sorry We need the 8+ because we have received the NavisAccess code 5.0 and were hoping it would fix some of our management and reporting problems with earlier versions but it does not support anything earlier than 8.0 (because of the MIB structure changes I guess) Reporting in the earlier version of NA did not scale to the level we needed for scheduled reports...(business units want to know) and 58 machines running two to three reports each was too much for the program... The other reason to get off the 1800s and 2000s was based on the reluctance of Lucent to continue producing code updates for the models....I was waiting for enhanced security for admin/helpdesk support (released in 8+) pseudo banner elimination in 8+, bugs in the modems when using outbound modem pooling..... -----Original Message----- From: troy@psknet.com [mailto:troy@psknet.com] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:30 PM To: everett, edwin /hdqt; ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 Edwin, You may want to consider getting away from whatever mail client you're using, or at least configure it to send mail in plain text format. Most folks on most lists would appreciate it. About the max 3000. I've no direct experience, but it's probably as solid as the rest of the Ascend line. It has the 100Mbit ethernet port, which I would imagine is as buggy as the 6000 chassis. It works, but in my experience, it doesn't like some hubs and switches. Works great with my cisco stuff though. As for getting up to the 8.x code. Why? i'm still at 7.0.26, and my maxes work flawlessly. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > Edwin_Everett@cargill.com > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:08 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Cc: ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 3000 > > << File: BDY.RTF >> << File: BDY.RTF >> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Thu Dec 7 19:49:00 2000 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: It does suck when companies decide to stop supporting perfectly good platforms. I love my 1800 for doing ISDN centrex to business customers on a budget, in fact, at my last job, I had a Pipeline 400 running version 4.6something without a problem, though it would have been nice to have more current code to fix the clock on it :) Anyways, the 3k should do you good, as should the 6k. If you have enough ports to justify it, you might want to take a look at the TNT or APX. I myself can't wait to get my hands on the APX (gotta wait until I get up to about 15 PRI, then switch everything to DS3). G'luck with your upgrades, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short ** -----Original Message----- ** From: Edwin_Everett@cargill.com [mailto:Edwin_Everett@cargill.com] ** Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:34 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com; troy@psknet.com ** Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 ** ** ** Hows this.....it was set to Rich Text.....sorry ** ** We need the 8+ because we have received the NavisAccess code 5.0 and ** were hoping it would fix some of our management and reporting problems ** with earlier versions but it does not support anything earlier than 8.0 ** (because of the MIB structure changes I guess) ** ** Reporting in the earlier version of NA did not scale to the level we ** needed for scheduled reports...(business units want to know) and 58 ** machines running two to three reports each was too much for the ** program... ** ** The other reason to get off the 1800s and 2000s was based on the ** reluctance of Lucent to continue producing code updates for the ** models....I was waiting for enhanced security for admin/helpdesk ** support (released in 8+) pseudo banner elimination in 8+, bugs in the ** modems when using outbound modem pooling..... ** ** -----Original Message----- ** From: troy@psknet.com [mailto:troy@psknet.com] ** Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:30 PM ** To: everett, edwin /hdqt; ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 ** ** ** ** Edwin, ** ** You may want to consider getting away from whatever mail client you're ** using, or at least configure it to send mail in plain text format. Most ** folks on most lists would appreciate it. ** ** About the max 3000. I've no direct experience, but it's probably as ** solid ** as the rest of the Ascend line. It has the 100Mbit ethernet port, ** which I ** would imagine is as buggy as the 6000 chassis. It works, but in my ** experience, it doesn't like some hubs and switches. Works great with my ** cisco stuff though. ** ** As for getting up to the 8.x code. Why? i'm still at 7.0.26, and my ** maxes ** work flawlessly. ** ** ** -- ** Troy Settle ** Pulaski Networks ** 540.994.4254 ** ** It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short ** ** ** > -----Original Message----- ** > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of ** > Edwin_Everett@cargill.com ** > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:08 PM ** > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** > Cc: ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk ** > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 3000 ** > ** > << File: BDY.RTF >> << File: BDY.RTF >> ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Dec 7 21:33:33 2000 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 3000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20001208143333.00afd280@mail.ascend.com.au> At 16:07 7/12/00 -0600, you wrote: > >I would like to hear from anyone out there that has deployed the Max >3000 model. > >What are its current strengths and weaknesses? Buggy? > >Please let me know. We are considering it to get past the 8.X TAOS >hurdle for many 1800s and 2000s... I really like it. If someone offered me a mixed batch of 2000's and 1800's, and a single max 3000, I'd take the 3000 any day. It was designed by some of the people in Edinburgh who used to work for Shiva, and now work for Ascend/Lucent. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From bds at jhb.ucs.co.za Fri Dec 8 02:23:56 2000 From: bds at jhb.ucs.co.za (Berend De Schouwer) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 In-Reply-To: ; from Edwin_Everett@cargill.com on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 03:34:01 +0200 References: Message-ID: <20001208102356.E21194@bds.ucs.co.za> On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 03:34:01 Edwin_Everett@cargill.com wrote: > Hows this.....it was set to Rich Text.....sorry > > We need the 8+ because we have received the NavisAccess code 5.0 and > were hoping it would fix some of our management and reporting problems > with earlier versions but it does not support anything earlier than 8.0 > (because of the MIB structure changes I guess) > > Reporting in the earlier version of NA did not scale to the level we > needed for scheduled reports...(business units want to know) and 58 > machines running two to three reports each was too much for the > program... > > The other reason to get off the 1800s and 2000s was based on the > reluctance of Lucent to continue producing code updates for the > models....I was waiting for enhanced security for admin/helpdesk > support (released in 8+) pseudo banner elimination in 8+, bugs in the > modems when using outbound modem pooling..... If you use outbound calls, consider 8.0.2. 8.0.3 flatly refuses to dial if the outbound phone number comes from Radius for me. I have verified that it actually gets the Radius profile from the Radius server in the debugging screen, when it needs to call, but it doesn't dial at all. It does dial of its setup in Ethernet->Connections. It does dial with Radius in 8.0.2. > -----Original Message----- > From: troy@psknet.com [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:30 PM > To: everett, edwin /hdqt; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Max 3000 > > > > Edwin, > > You may want to consider getting away from whatever mail client you're > using, or at least configure it to send mail in plain text format. Most > folks on most lists would appreciate it. > > About the max 3000. I've no direct experience, but it's probably as > solid > as the rest of the Ascend line. It has the 100Mbit ethernet port, > which I > would imagine is as buggy as the 6000 chassis. It works, but in my > experience, it doesn't like some hubs and switches. Works great with my > cisco stuff though. > > As for getting up to the 8.x code. Why? i'm still at 7.0.26, and my > maxes > work flawlessly. > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 > > It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > > Edwin_Everett@cargill.com > > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:08 PM > > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > Cc: ascend@saffron.colloquium.co.uk > > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 3000 > > > > << File: BDY.RTF >> << File: BDY.RTF >> > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: > Kind regards, Berend -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From KComer at nwonline.net Fri Dec 8 16:07:29 2000 From: KComer at nwonline.net (Keith Comer) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <70E16393FAC3D311861E00E02954B45C03E6@snuffy.nwonline.net> We have a user who is using a router with dual isdn, he is dialing into a Max TNT. The software version on the TNT is 2.1.9 The network that the router is servicing has 5 Macs and 8 PC's. The PC's have no problem but the Macs download really slow if at all when the router is dialed up to the Max TNT. Now, if the isdn router dials to a Max 4048 with software version 6.1.7 the Macs and PCs can access the internet and transfer data at the correct speeds one would expect from dual ISDN. This has been verified several times and its always true. I was wondering if anyone had experienced something like this or if anyone has an idea of how to fix it. Several different routers have been tried on the customers end with the same results on all of them. I think the only way to fix this is to upgrade the software on the TNT but the only problem with that is some of the hardware in it isn't supported by the new software versions. Keith Comer Network Support Specialist NetWorld Online 419.334.9042 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From butch at sheltonbbs.com Fri Dec 8 18:10:44 2000 From: butch at sheltonbbs.com (Butch Evans) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: your mail In-Reply-To: <70E16393FAC3D311861E00E02954B45C03E6@snuffy.nwonline.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Keith Comer wrote: > have no problem but the Macs download really slow if at all when the router > is dialed up to the Max TNT. Now, if the isdn router dials to a Max 4048 Check the MTU along the path. If the Macs are slow even coming from your network (just on this side of your TNT), then I would bet money on this as the cause. -- Butch Evans Shelton Internet Network Admin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From KComer at nwonline.net Fri Dec 8 18:46:47 2000 From: KComer at nwonline.net (Keith Comer) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: your mail Message-ID: <70E16393FAC3D311861E00E02954B45C03E7@snuffy.nwonline.net> The Macs work fine on the local network. There is a novell fileserver that they access and they have no problems with it. I will still take a look at the mtu's between the tnt and the 4048. -----Original Message----- From: Butch Evans [mailto:butch@sheltonbbs.com] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 7:11 PM To: Keith Comer Cc: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' Subject: Re: your mail On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Keith Comer wrote: > have no problem but the Macs download really slow if at all when the router > is dialed up to the Max TNT. Now, if the isdn router dials to a Max 4048 Check the MTU along the path. If the Macs are slow even coming from your network (just on this side of your TNT), then I would bet money on this as the cause. -- Butch Evans Shelton Internet Network Admin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From I-MARKETING-30 at excite.com Sun Dec 10 01:12:57 2000 From: I-MARKETING-30 at excite.com (I-MARKETING-30@excite.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Scooters! Message-ID: Models the Kids are lining-up for... at low cost. JONSON:$69.95 JDBUG: $79.95 Available in 5 different colors... Order Online: http://SCOOTER-MANIA.4mg.com Order By Phone: 1-602-402-5275 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Mon Dec 11 11:39:12 2000 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: [none] In-Reply-To: <200012090645.WAA06196@max.bungi.com> References: <200012090645.WAA06196@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Keith Comer > >We have a user who is using a router with dual isdn, he is dialing into a >Max TNT. The software version on the TNT is 2.1.9 2.1.9?! When I were a lad... >The network that the router is servicing has 5 Macs and 8 PC's. The PC's >have no problem but the Macs download really slow if at all when the router >is dialed up to the Max TNT. Now, if the isdn router dials to a Max 4048 >with software version 6.1.7 the Macs and PCs can access the internet and >transfer data at the correct speeds one would expect from dual ISDN. This >has been verified several times and its always true. I was wondering if >anyone had experienced something like this or if anyone has an idea of how >to fix it. Several different routers have been tried on the customers end >with the same results on all of them. I think the only way to fix this is to >upgrade the software on the TNT but the only problem with that is some of >the hardware in it isn't supported by the new software versions. It would help if you mentioned what type of ISDN CPE router you're using. Old Netopias with equally-old firmware had a problem negotiating Stac compression with the TNT. This was fixed in Netopia firmware 3.1.3, or, if you're allergic to firmware upgrades entirely, you can disable Stac on the profile. As your TNT firmware is from the same bygone era, I thought I'd mention it. HTH. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From srl at metronet.com Mon Dec 11 15:29:11 2000 From: srl at metronet.com (S. Linebarger) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? Message-ID: I've already been looking over the existing archives for the answer. And looking at all of the PDF docu files from ascend/lucent. (I've used many pipelines before but I'm really a cisco guy.) If you call my max at 214-448-2301, it answers with a wierd sound, that is NOT a modem tone. It has been answering ISDN calls pretty much ok. Analog calls raise the CRC counters in the WAN stat window (seems meaningful) I can't seem to make voice call get routed to the modems, and I think it is some kinda slot numbering thing....? I'm more than a little fuzzy on how to specify getting the modems to answer an analog call. This box isn't in service yet, so I can try almost anything. Software +7.0.22+ Sys-> Sys config x Single Answer=Yes x Sub-Adr=Routing x Serial=0 x LAN=2 x DM=1 x V.110=0 x Use Trunk Grps=No x Excl Routing=No Then in K56 Modem-16-> Mod config x Ans 1#=1 x Ans 2#=2144462301 x Ans 3#=4462301 x Ans 4#= in Ethernet-> Mod config-> Wan Options I've got: x >Dial Plan=N/A x Ans 1#=2144462301 x Ans 2#=8172592301 x Ans 3#= x Ans 4#= x Pool#1 start=A.B.C.17 x Pool#1 count=47 When I call it , this gets put into syslog for call detail logging: 14:50:45 call 4 CL 0K c=185 p=10 s=56000 r=56000 14:50:45 call 4 CL 0K c=185 p=10 s=56000 r=56000 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, line 1, channel 1, CallDisconnected [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, line 1, channel 1, CallDisconnected [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, Call Terminated [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, Call Terminated [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:50 "?" 9722413437->4462301 ? 56000/56000 10/185) Auth=(13 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) 14:50:50 "?" 9722413437->4462301 ? 56000/56000 10/185) Auth=(13 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Is this a modem call routing issue? I'm thinking perhaps I need to specify 9 somewhere, since slot 9 shows in the logging. Can anyone share an otherwise typical Max 4048 config that handles incoming ISDN, and v.90 analog on ISDN PRIs? Steve Linebarger, Texas Metronet, 12200 Ford rd, Suite 170, Dallas Tx, 75234 srl@metronet.com Vmail 972-705-2900 fax: 972-484-2173 Office: 972-488-2170 beep: 214/332-0448 Home1: 972-857-2368 Home2: 972-488-8566 Cell: 972-478-2269 alt pager 800-420-0572 http://www.metronet.com/~s (send me a cell phone/SMS text message) From Peter.DeSchrijver at netcom-kassel.de Tue Dec 12 10:53:33 2000 From: Peter.DeSchrijver at netcom-kassel.de (De Schrijver Peter) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Called number not showing Message-ID: Hi ! I am using the latest ascendd with a max 6000 running 7.0.3, wan connection is multiple E1 (Germany). In radius logs I don?t see the called number . Why ? TIA Peter De Schrijver PS: I?d like to authenticate on user ID AND Called Number - but if I don?t see the called number this won?t be possible right ? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Tue Dec 12 16:28:48 2000 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] FOR SALE: Max4048's Message-ID: <023d01c0648a$e60007c0$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> I have a few Asend Max 4048's that are in excellent condition that we are trying to sell immediately. These units have been fully tested, cleaned, verified that there are no passwords on them and packaged for shipment in new Lucent boxes. I will sell complete units or just spare MOD-16 cards. We warranty these products for 90 Days. If you are interested please email me offline at scott@millenniumsolutions.net Regards, Scott Woodland Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 4 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net From mnazri at mimos.my Wed Dec 13 01:20:16 2000 From: mnazri at mimos.my (Mohd Nazri Ismail) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #2149 In-Reply-To: <200012130645.WAA23780@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: How abour your planning to deploy V.92/V.44 bis. Cisco will deploy/launch early next year. We will upgraded our ascend equipment to V.92 modem. --naz .~. /V\ L I N U X // \\ > Don't fear the penguin < /( )\ ^^-^^ --Nazri--- On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com wrote: > > ascend-users-digest Tuesday, 12 December 19100 Volume 96 : Number 2149 > > In this issue: > > (ASCEND) Called number not showing > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: De Schrijver Peter > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:53:33 +0100 > Subject: (ASCEND) Called number not showing > > Hi ! > > I am using the latest ascendd with a max 6000 running 7.0.3, wan > connection is multiple E1 (Germany). > > In radius logs I donīt see the called number . > > Why ? > > TIA > Peter De Schrijver > > PS: Iīd like to authenticate on user ID AND Called Number - but if I > donīt see the called number this wonīt be possible right ? > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: > > ------------------------------ > > End of ascend-users-digest V96 #2149 > ************************************ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++ > To unsubscribe: > "echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com" > To get FAQ'd: > or > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From os at landshut.org Wed Dec 13 08:56:52 2000 From: os at landshut.org (Oliver Stettner) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Called number not showing References: Message-ID: <3A378E34.93A423E6@landshut.org> De Schrijver Peter wrote: > I am using the latest ascendd with a max 6000 running 7.0.3, wan > connection is multiple E1 (Germany). > > In radius logs I don?t see the called number . > > Why ? I guess you have the inform your Carrier. At least we had to do that. > PS: I?d like to authenticate on user ID AND Called Number - but if I > don?t see the called number this won?t be possible right ? That's absolutely right. ;-) Oliver. -- Oliver Stettner | mailto:os@landshut.org Laendgasse 120 | http://www.landshut.org/members/os/ D-84028 Landshut | ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Wed Dec 13 16:20:11 2000 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #2149 In-Reply-To: References: <200012130645.WAA23780@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20001213172011.00c31bb0@mail.ascend.com.au> At 15:20 13/12/00 +0800, Mohd Nazri Ismail wrote: > >How abour your planning to deploy V.92/V.44 bis. Cisco will deploy/launch >early next year. > >We will upgraded our ascend equipment to V.92 modem. Here is the official statement from the LU website. http://www.lucent.com/press/1100/001109.nsa.html Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ahakim at intouch.com Thu Dec 14 01:53:07 2000 From: ahakim at intouch.com (Ahmed El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re:MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? (S. Linebarger) References: <200012121801.eBCI1Fn08801@sprite.real-time.com> Message-ID: <002e01c065a3$3986bce0$094783d5@salec.com.eg> Can you send the E1 PRI on your box config. ? Best Regards, Ahmed El-Hakim From srl at beanix.metronet.com Thu Dec 14 14:46:53 2000 From: srl at beanix.metronet.com (srl@metronet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re:MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? (S. Linebarger) In-Reply-To: from "Ahmed El-Hakim" at Dec 14, 2000 09:53:07 AM Message-ID: <200012142046.AA14436@metronet.com> Ahmed El-Hakim asked: > Can you send the E1 PRI on your box config. ? Gladly, in fact. I'm willing to pay somebody to help me make this work soon :-) Here is my situation: I have a max 4xxx with Two PRIS and 48 modems. (tay2.metronet.com) If I put the incoming numbers of the PRIs in (Ethernet->Mod config->Wan optionsAns 1#) it handles "dialup" ISDN ( variable address, cistron radius served Auth ) just fine. I only just today got the digital modems to answer at all,by emptying out the "ans #" numbers in ethernet->Mod config->Wan..... BUT it will not answer analog modem calls correctly(yet). It answers with wrong tones or modem + wrong tones. If I take those numbers OUT, it will answer wit the digital modems, just fine, but..... It starts try to do a PPP callback! (argh) I've turned off modem call in the tserv area and also turned off cpcb . IS IT POSSIBLE to have a Max 4048 answer both ISDN PPP and analog modem PPP calls on the same number, in basically the same way,but sending the modem calls to the digital modems? Perhaps I need to get just another number from my Telco for dialup isdn calls? Does anyone have an sample config of doing what I consider the most typical ISP dialup setup. My textual config comes next.... Steve Linebarger, Texas Metronet, 12200 Ford rd, Suite 170, Dallas Tx, 75234 http://www.metronet.com/~s (send me a cell phone/SMS text message) srl@metronet.com fax: 972-484-2173 Office: 972-488-2170 beep: 214/332-0448 Cell: 972-478-2269 > Can you send the E1 PRI on your box config. ? > > Best Regards, > Ahmed El-Hakim > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > > > End of rte-ascend Digest > From srl at beanix.metronet.com Thu Dec 14 15:01:13 2000 From: srl at beanix.metronet.com (srl@metronet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re:MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? (S. Linebarger) In-Reply-To: from "Ahmed El-Hakim" at Dec 14, 2000 09:53:07 AM Message-ID: <200012142101.AA15895@metronet.com> > Can you send the E1 PRI on your box config. ? > > Best Regards, > Ahmed El-Hakim > > --__--__-- I've taken out all of the default/empty stuff, connections,destinations,dial plans,routes (besides default), firewalls,filters,security. Steve Linebarger, Texas Metronet, 12200 Ford rd, Suite 170, Dallas Tx, 75234 http://www.metronet.com/~s (send me a cell phone/SMS text message) srl@metronet.com fax: 972-484-2173 Office: 972-488-2170 beep: 214/332-0448 Home1: 972-857-2368 Home2: 972-488-8566 Cell: 972-478-2269 -------------------------- Ready to download - type any key to start... START=SYSTEM=0=0 Name=tay2 Location=taylor comm,dallas Contact=srl@metronet.com,tmi.net/~s Max Dialout Time=255 Single Answer=No Sub-Adr=Routing Serial=3 LAN=2 V.110=4 Excl Routing=Yes Idle Logout=60 DS0 Min Rst=Monthly No Trunk Alarm=Yes New NASPortID=Yes EchoSuppressToneDisable=Yes Perm Conn Update=Changed Modem:PRI # Type=National END=SYSTEM=0=0 START=ROUTE=900=0 Name=Default Active=Yes Gateway=207.170.105.1 Metric=1 Private=Yes END=ROUTE=900=0 Use Answer as Default=Yes Select CLID=User Prefer Assign Adrs=Yes Encaps...COMB=No Encaps...FR=No PPP options...Link Comp=None COMB options...Compression=None Session options...Idle=65533 Session options...TS Idle Mode=Input/Output Session options...TS Idle=300 END=CONN=900=0 START=CONN=900=1 END=CONN=900=1 START=SWAN=1100=0 Ext. Clock * 1K=64 END=SWAN=1100=0 START=LMODEM=300=0 Ans 1#=1 Ans 2#=2 Ans 3#=3 Ans 4#=0 END=LMODEM=300=0 START=LMODEM=400=0 Ans 1#=1 Ans 2#=2 Ans 3#=3 Ans 4#=0 END=LMODEM=400=0 START=LMODEM=500=0 Ans 1#=1 Ans 2#=2 Ans 3#=3 Ans 4#=0 END=LMODEM=500=0 START=ETHERNET=900=0 Ether options...IP Adrs=207.170.105.2/26 Ether options...2nd Adrs=207.170.110.3/27 Ether options...RIP=Both-v2 Ether options...Ignore Def Rt=No Ether options...Proxy Mode=Active WAN options...Dial Plan=Extended WAN options...Pool#1 start=207.170.105.17 WAN options...Pool#1 count=47 WAN options...Pool#1 name:=max1-pool1 TServ options...TS Enabled=Yes TServ options...PPP=Yes TServ options...Telnet=Yes TServ options...Immed Service=Rlogin TServ options...Immed Host=192.245.137.3 TServ options...PPP Delay=1 TServ options...PPP Direct=Yes ICMP Redirects=Ignore DNS...Domain Name=tmi.net DNS...Sec Domain Name=metronet.com DNS...Pri DNS=204.29.189.130 DNS...Sec DNS=204.29.189.130 DNS...Client Pri DNS=204.29.189.130 DNS...Client Sec DNS=192.245.137.1 Auth...Auth=RADIUS Auth...Auth Host #1=207.170.106.14 Auth...Auth Host #2=192.245.137.12 Auth...Auth Host #3=192.245.137.3 Auth...Auth Port=1645 Auth...Auth Timeout=3 Auth...Auth Key=*SECURE* Auth...Local Profiles First=No Accounting...Acct=RADIUS Accounting...Acct Host #1=192.245.137.3 Log...Syslog=Yes Log...Log Host=192.245.137.1 Log...Log Software Version=Yes Log...Log CallInfo=EndOfCall Modem Ringback=No Finger=Yes Call Logging...Call Log=Yes Call Logging...Host #1=192.245.137.3 Call Logging...Call Log Timeout=60 Call Logging...Key=*SECURE* Reply DirectedBcast Ping=No Forward Directed Bcast=No END=ETHERNET=900=0 START=LINE=100=0 Name=Factory 2nd Line=Trunk Line 1...Sig Mode=ISDN Line 1...Switch Type=NI-2 Line 1...Framing Mode=ESF Line 1...Encoding=B8ZS Line 1...Ch 24=D-Channel Line 2...Sig Mode=ISDN Line 2...Switch Type=NI-2 Line 2...Framing Mode=ESF Line 2...Encoding=B8ZS Line 2...Ch 1=Unused Line 2...Ch 2=Unused Line 2...Ch 3=Unused Line 2...Ch 4=Unused Line 2...Ch 5=Unused Line 2...Ch 6=Unused Line 2...Ch 7=Unused Line 2...Ch 8=Unused Line 2...Ch 9=Unused Line 2...Ch 10=Unused Line 2...Ch 11=Unused Line 2...Ch 12=Unused Line 2...Ch 13=Unused Line 2...Ch 14=Unused Line 2...Ch 15=Unused Line 2...Ch 16=Unused Line 2...Ch 17=Unused Line 2...Ch 18=Unused Line 2...Ch 19=Unused Line 2...Ch 20=Unused Line 2...Ch 21=Unused Line 2...Ch 22=Unused Line 2...Ch 23=Unused Line 2...Ch 24=D-Channel END=LINE=100=0 START=LINE=100=1 END=LINE=100=1 START=LINE=100=2 END=LINE=100=2 START=LINE=100=3 END=LINE=100=3 START=LINE=100=4 END=LINE=100=4 START=LINE=200=0 Name=Factory END=LINE=200=0 START=LINE=200=1 END=LINE=200=1 START=LINE=200=2 END=LINE=200=2 START=LINE=200=3 END=LINE=200=3 START=LINE=200=4 END=LINE=200=4 END DOWNLOAD Download complete - type any key to return to menu... From maxed_out_user at hotmail.com Fri Dec 15 02:27:47 2000 From: maxed_out_user at hotmail.com (Max User) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re:MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? (S. Linebarger) Message-ID: First of all, when you are using E1/PRI (versus E1/R2) or T1/PRI (versus inband signalled T1), it is definitely possible to have ISDN and modem calls answered by using only one phone number. Because with PRIs, the type of call (voice or data) is present in the ISDN setup message so the Max can distinguish the type of call and internally route it to the appropriate slot card. By default, if you take out all slot numbers and Ans #s in your configurations, things should work fine. However, I noticed that you also changed other default configs which is causing the undesired behavior you are seeing (and funny things you will see once you get past the modem handshaking). Specifically: Sub-Adr=Routing (set this to None) --I have never seen anyone ever use Sub-Adr so turn it off. Excl Routing=Yes (set this to No) --This one parameter alone is probably the most critical one that is causing you all the grief (those unusual tones and such when you configure various combinations of Ans #s and slot numbers). Read about it in your Reference manual. Select CLID=User Prefer (set it back to default) --Unless you also want to do caller-id authentication, you should not need to set this. I don't remember what the default setting is offhand (I think it was "First"), but whatever it was, change it back if you never planned on doing caller-id authentication. Actually I don't think it matters if you have "ID Auth=Ignore" under Ethernet->Answer, but this just raised a flag to me that you might be configuring that area of caller-id authentication. TServ options...PPP Delay=1 (set to 5) --If you set this to 1 second, then most likely all PPP users will not have enough chance to start negotiating PPP and will get dropped to the terminal server. Set it back to the default of 5 seconds, which has been proven to be optimal for most people. Modem Ringback=No (this one varies) --Usually, having modem ringback set to yes has always worked well so I wouldn't change it from the default setting of "yes" I think that about covers it. Hopefully this should fix your problem. >Can you send the E1 PRI on your box config. ? > >Best Regards, >Ahmed El-Hakim > >--__--__-- I've taken out all of the default/empty stuff, connections,destinations,dial plans,routes (besides default), firewalls,filters,security. Steve Linebarger, Texas Metronet, 12200 Ford rd, Suite 170, Dallas Tx, 75234 http://www.metronet.com/~s (send me a cell phone/SMS text message) srl@metronet.com fax: 972-484-2173 Office: 972-488-2170 beep: 214/332-0448 Home1: 972-857-2368 Home2: 972-488-8566 Cell: 972-478-2269 -------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From danko at sezampro.yu Sat Dec 16 02:42:27 2000 From: danko at sezampro.yu (Danko Jevtovic) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi, I am exploring options to use MAX4060/4*E1 not only for dial-in but also for POP to CO connectivity. Currently I am using them for 2*PRI dial-in (full 60 channel load). Will it be able to handle additional load for nailed circuit (either E1 or serial)? I tried to establish direct crossover cable E1 to E1 connection but without success. I have found document on esight.com explaining T1-T1 connection but I was not able to do same thing with E1. What Signaling mode, Switch type and Framing mode should I use. Are there any special considerations for Connections and Answer profile. My other plan is to use frame relay on synchronous serial port with V35. Can it be done and are then any compatibility or performance issues? Thanks for suggestions, regards, Danko Jevtovic ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.de Sat Dec 16 10:03:14 2000 From: sp at iphh.de (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max Setup design question Message-ID: Dear folks, I need some hint with a design problem. Imagine a situation where there is just a single Max and a Radiusserver (Master & Backupradius but that doesn't matter). On the Max there are normal "pooled" dialin-users that get authenticated via radius and there are some users with static ip-networks as well. The Max advertises these networks via OSPF. Some of them users have static radius-routes with dialout-profiles on the radiusserver as well. Everythings working fine. Now we come to the fact that we need to add more Maxen to this place (let's say just a second one to keep things simple). Both Maxen are connected to E1-PRIs with the same numbers to dialin. There is no problem with them pool or static-ip users but with the dialout profiles. I thought: "hey! why shouldn't I just send them dialout-routes to the 1st Max (route-nameofthemax-1 instead of route-1). That works fine but now when a user with a static ip-network dials into Max2 (the telco-switch decides the call-routing), Max1 is still advertising the static ip-networks for them dialout-profiles via OSPF. I set up stacking as well but that doesn't seem to help here. Any good suggestions? Thanks i.a.! Sascha ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ross_msn at msn.com Sat Dec 16 11:07:34 2000 From: ross_msn at msn.com (Ross M. Greenberg) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 References: Message-ID: <005001c06782$afd73560$0264a8c0@yyy> Anybody? Help!?!?! Thanks! Ross ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ahakim at intouch.com Sun Dec 17 01:57:42 2000 From: ahakim at intouch.com (Ahmed El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection (Danko Jevtovic) Message-ID: <005701c067ff$08f21c60$094783d5@salec.com.eg> E1 back-to-back connection is working fine. You need to set Signaling Mode = NONE, Switch type = CAS, Framing = 2DS, and then change the channels mode from switched to nailed and add the group number to each channel (that number represents this specific connection) We have tried Frame Relay with V.35 and is working fine with no compatibility constraints. Best Regards, Ahmed El-Hakim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20001217/7207e607/attachment.html From eobu01 at cantv.net Sun Dec 17 07:41:10 2000 From: eobu01 at cantv.net (eobu01@cantv.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) L2F HELP Message-ID: <11418200012017134110203@cantv.net> Hi Matt, Walter, my name is Eduardo Ortiz I am a SE TS from a NPS Channel in Venezuela rigth now I traing to up a demo in a large ISP in my country with a MAX TNT Iam traing a RAS with VPN, this Cia. have a major plataform with Cisco they have diferent type of costumer one of this are VPN but they want to be made with VPN L2F Protocols, I being traing a lot of combination with this tunnels but it fail, rigth now and finaly it start the tunnel but it go down because it do not send the IP Address I do not if you can help me with this or tell me some one that have some nowlege about it client ------->MAX TNT----------> CISCO Router <-----------------------------------> OK Tunnel up <---------------------------------------------------- DO NOT send a IP Address I traing to find some information about L2F with a MAX TNT but I could not find a lot that can help me thanks BEST REGARDS Eduardo Ortiz Zenun Corp Vzla. eobu01@cantv.net www.zenuncorp.com 5814 3061909 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ross_msn at msn.com Sun Dec 17 10:08:32 2000 From: ross_msn at msn.com (Ross M. Greenberg) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 References: Message-ID: <009101c06843$9b5c7840$0264a8c0@yyy> Ping works like a champ, traceroute, both from the terminal server and from even the MSDOSWindow's TRACERT never return: the DNS is called giving me the actual IP I'm trying to get to, but the info on the route never shows up, timing out. I'm sure it has to so with NAT (my local is 192.168.100.1, so how can the ICMP find its way back_ but I have no idea on how to set it up.... Thanks! Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Troy Settle" To: "Ross M. Greenberg" ; Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 9:43 AM Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 > > Traceroute works just fine for me. > > What, exactly, seems to be the problem you're experiencing? > > Does it give you some sort of error? If so, what error? > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 > > It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short. > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Ross M. Greenberg > ** Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 12:08 PM > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 > ** > ** > ** Anybody? > ** > ** Help!?!?! > ** > ** Thanks! > ** > ** Ross > ** > ** > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** To get FAQ'd: > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Sun Dec 17 11:07:13 2000 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: <200012170645.WAA06296@max.bungi.com> References: <200012170645.WAA06296@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Danko Jevtovic" > >I am exploring options to use MAX4060/4*E1 not only for dial-in but also for >POP to CO connectivity. > >Currently I am using them for 2*PRI dial-in (full 60 channel load). Will it >be able to handle additional load for nailed circuit (either E1 or serial)? Should be fine. There's only one way to find out... >I tried to establish direct crossover cable E1 to E1 connection but without >success. I have found document on esight.com explaining T1-T1 connection but >I was not able to do same thing with E1. What Signaling mode, Switch type >and Framing mode should I use. Are there any special considerations for >Connections and Answer profile. First, the E1 layer. Are you seeing the E1 come up at all? We use T1, and I'm not sure of the specific differences (other than speed), but to cross one over just set up with the same signalling on each side and set one to Clock Source=Yes and the other to No. The actual Signalling, Switch, and Framing you use over the final, production E1 will be determined by the telco, but for your crossover test just make sure that both sides match. Second, the encapsulation layer. You can use PPP or Frame Relay, whichever you feel comfortable with. PPP is a bit simpler to set up. Just set both sides to nailed, no authentication. You probably won't have huge amounts of traffic with only two E1 for dialup, so don't use compression. That'll help the processor keep up, and compression likely wouldn't help with a 2mbps link anyway. If you use Frame Relay, one side will be DTE, the other DCE, with everything else the same on each end. >My other plan is to use frame relay on synchronous serial port with V35. Can >it be done and are then any compatibility or performance issues? I've never used the v.35 port. HTH. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Sun Dec 17 08:43:28 2000 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 In-Reply-To: <005001c06782$afd73560$0264a8c0@yyy> Message-ID: Traceroute works just fine for me. What, exactly, seems to be the problem you're experiencing? Does it give you some sort of error? If so, what error? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Ross M. Greenberg ** Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 12:08 PM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 ** ** ** Anybody? ** ** Help!?!?! ** ** Thanks! ** ** Ross ** ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From marcus.akesson at home.se Sun Dec 17 11:16:57 2000 From: marcus.akesson at home.se (Marcus =?iso-8859-1?Q?Åkesson?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Getting Traceroute to work on a Pipe75 In-Reply-To: <009101c06843$9b5c7840$0264a8c0@yyy> References: Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20001217181657.00b54100@hugin> At 11:08 2000-12-17 -0500, Ross M. Greenberg wrote: >Ping works like a champ, traceroute, both from the terminal server and from even the MSDOSWindow's TRACERT never return: the DNS is called giving me the actual IP I'm trying to get to, but the info on the route never shows up, timing out. > >I'm sure it has to so with NAT (my local is 192.168.100.1, so how can the ICMP find its way back_ but I have no idea on how to set it up.... Correct. Traceroute doesn't work with Pipelines running NAT. Ascend never acknowledged it as a bug, so it's more like a missing feature really. Nothing You can do about it. /Marcus -- Marcus AAkesson marcus.akesson@NO_SPAM_PLEASE_home.se Gothenburg Callsigns: SM6XFN & SB4779 Sweden >>>>>> Keep the world clean - no HTML in news or mail ! <<<<<< ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From bargi at webfront.net.au Sun Dec 17 17:42:06 2000 From: bargi at webfront.net.au (Raymond Brighenti) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20001218103340.00b01578@mail.webfront.net.au> Hi, Should/Will be OK, we have a Max6000 at our main site which links to a 4000 via a 320K (5x64K ISDN channels), it gets pretty busy and we have had no problems, the 6000 also is running other incoming ISDN channels as well as 90 modems and the 4000 is running 60 modems and no lock ups/fall overs or ongoing processor/performance problems. Ray At 09:42 AM 16/12/2000 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I am exploring options to use MAX4060/4*E1 not only for dial-in but also for >POP to CO connectivity. > >Currently I am using them for 2*PRI dial-in (full 60 channel load). Will it >be able to handle additional load for nailed circuit (either E1 or serial)? > >I tried to establish direct crossover cable E1 to E1 connection but without >success. I have found document on esight.com explaining T1-T1 connection but >I was not able to do same thing with E1. What Signaling mode, Switch type >and Framing mode should I use. Are there any special considerations for >Connections and Answer profile. > >My other plan is to use frame relay on synchronous serial port with V35. Can >it be done and are then any compatibility or performance issues? > >Thanks for suggestions, regards, Danko Jevtovic > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From srl at metronet.com Tue Dec 12 12:26:16 2000 From: srl at metronet.com (S. Linebarger) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? Message-ID: <200012121826.eBCIQgK17264@beanix.metronet.com> [Note, I'm not sure which Ascend lists exist anymore...tho I've sent this to the real/time list] I've already been looking over the existing archives for the answer. And looking at all of the PDF docu files from ascend/lucent. (I've used many pipelines before but I'm really a cisco guy.) If you call my max at 214-448-2301, it answers with a wierd sound, that is NOT a modem tone. It has been answering ISDN calls pretty much ok. Analog calls raise the CRC counters in the WAN stat window (seems meaningful) I can't seem to make voice call get routed to the modems, and I think it is some kinda slot numbering thing....? I'm more than a little fuzzy on how to specify getting the modems to answer an analog call. This box isn't in service yet, so I can try almost anything. Software +7.0.22+ Sys-> Sys config x Single Answer=Yes x Sub-Adr=Routing x Serial=0 x LAN=2 x DM=1 x V.110=0 x Use Trunk Grps=No x Excl Routing=No Then in K56 Modem-16-> Mod config x Ans 1#=1 x Ans 2#=2144462301 x Ans 3#=4462301 x Ans 4#= in Ethernet-> Mod config-> Wan Options I've got: x >Dial Plan=N/A x Ans 1#=2144462301 x Ans 2#=8172592301 x Ans 3#= x Ans 4#= x Pool#1 start=A.B.C.17 x Pool#1 count=47 When I call it , this gets put into syslog for call detail logging: 14:50:45 call 4 CL 0K c=185 p=10 s=56000 r=56000 14:50:45 call 4 CL 0K c=185 p=10 s=56000 r=56000 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, line 1, channel 1, CallDisconnected [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, line 1, channel 1, CallDisconnected [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, Call Terminated [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:45 slot 9 port 1, Call Terminated [MBID 4; 9722413437->4462301] 14:50:50 "?" 9722413437->4462301 ? 56000/56000 10/185) Auth=(13 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) 14:50:50 "?" 9722413437->4462301 ? 56000/56000 10/185) Auth=(13 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Is this a modem call routing issue? I'm thinking perhaps I need to specify 9 somewhere, since slot 9 shows in the logging. Can anyone share an otherwise typical Max 4048 config that handles incoming ISDN, and v.90 analog on ISDN PRIs? Steve Linebarger, Texas Metronet, 12200 Ford rd, Suite 170, Dallas Tx, 75234 srl@metronet.com http://www.metronet.com/~s (send me a cell phone/SMS text message) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From matt at thenetdoctors.com Mon Dec 18 11:41:50 2000 From: matt at thenetdoctors.com (Matt Edwards) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max 6000 used with ISP's Message-ID: <20001218174150.EC20C36F9@sitemail.everyone.net> I just bought a MAX 6000 for our ISP. For those of you who operate a MAX which version of the TAOS is the most stable for 56k dialup? Are their any brands of modems that are known to have frequent disconnects? i.e. Rockwell, Lucent winmodems. Any input or experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Matt Edwards _____________________________________________________________ You can get your free e-mail at www.netmds.com We also offer fast, reliable, no busy signals Internet connections for upstate SC. Net Doctors www.netmds.com From gdaley at lucent.com Mon Dec 18 16:17:45 2000 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MaxHP-4048, analog call routing to modem prob ? In-Reply-To: <200012121826.eBCIQgK17264@beanix.metronet.com> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20001218171745.00c129a0@mail.ascend.com.au> At , S. Linebarger wrote: > >[Note, I'm not sure which Ascend lists exist anymore...tho I've sent >this to the real/time list] > >I've already been looking over the existing archives for the answer. >And looking at all of the PDF docu files from ascend/lucent. >(I've used many pipelines before but I'm really a cisco guy.) > >If you call my max at 214-448-2301, it answers with a wierd sound, that >is NOT a modem tone. It has been answering ISDN calls pretty much ok. > >Analog calls raise the CRC counters in the WAN stat window (seems meaningful) > >I can't seem to make voice call get routed to the modems, and I think it >is some kinda slot numbering thing....? I'm more than a little fuzzy >on how to specify getting the modems to answer an analog call. > >This box isn't in service yet, so I can try almost anything. Hi, It sounds like you have a problem where the call is being routed to a hdlc resource rather than a modem. If you do not have any numbers in the modem->mod config or wan options, then you can let all numbers answer all call types, and be routed to the appropriate resource by the ISDN bearer capability, which is passed with the call-setup message. If you wish to restrict this, you can perform radius-preauthentication which could restrict the answered calls to Switched-Modem or Switched-64K (or not restricted, answering both). If you are having difficulty with this, then the TAC can help you. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From brianv at cvtv.net Mon Dec 18 22:05:38 2000 From: brianv at cvtv.net (Brian Varner) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) new ip numbers Message-ID: <001f01c06970$f3033060$250ba8c0@cvtv.net> I am in the process of switching upstream providers, which I will have to renumber all of my equipment - which consists of 3 MAX 4048, 1 MAX6096, and 1 TNT w/4 48 port modem cards. I am getting a /21 address space (8 class C's) from my new provider. Any suggestions on the best way to split up this new address space across my MAX's (we just recently acquired another ISP that is using 3COM Total Control boxes - so I will need to reserve a class C, maybe a little more, for that location) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks- Brian Brian Varner Network Operations Manager Colorado Valley Telephone Cooperative (979) 247-8163 brianv@cvtv.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Tue Dec 19 07:34:02 2000 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) new ip numbers In-Reply-To: <001f01c06970$f3033060$250ba8c0@cvtv.net> Message-ID: Might get other opinions, but here's how I'd do it: Carve out a /26 or so (maybe a /25 if you have lots of stuff) for your datacenter. This will be all your servers, routers, and all that junk. xxx.yyy.aaa.1/26 would be your border router. Use the rest of this /24 for your office, colo, or other subnets. >From there, start carving up the rest of your space, setting routes to the appropritate IP address (assigned from the /26 from above) xxx.yyy.bbb.0/26 - max 6096 xxx.yyy.bbb.64/27 - max 6096 xxx.yyy.bbb.96/27 - max 4048 1 xxx.yyy.bbb.128/28 - max 4048 1 xxx.yyy.bbb.144/28 - max 4048 2 xxx.yyy.bbb.160/27 - max 4048 2 xxx.yyy.bbb.192/27 - max 4048 3 xxx.yyy.bbb.224/28 - max 4048 3 xxx.yyy.bbb.240/28 - something (maybe route to a web server for virtual hosting or use for static IP assignments) xxx.yyy.ccc.0/27 - Max TNT xxx.yyy.ccc.32/28 - Max TNT This is really easy, especially if you have OSPF configured on your network. Just make static routes on each max with 127.0.0.2 as the gateway, then tell each max to suppress host routes. If you don't have OSPF, just set up statics on your border router. This can get tedious, but it works. Of course, in your position, I'd probably go buy more modems 'n stuff for the TNT, then move all the 6000 and 4000 boxes out to replace the 3com POS. G'luck, -Troy ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Brian Varner ** Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 11:06 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) new ip numbers ** ** ** I am in the process of switching upstream providers, which I will have to ** renumber all of my equipment - which consists of 3 MAX 4048, 1 ** MAX6096, and ** 1 TNT w/4 48 port modem cards. I am getting a /21 address space (8 class ** C's) from my new provider. Any suggestions on the best way to ** split up this ** new address space across my MAX's (we just recently acquired another ISP ** that is using 3COM Total Control boxes - so I will need to ** reserve a class ** C, maybe a little more, for that location) would be greatly appreciated. ** Thanks- ** Brian ** ** ** ** Brian Varner ** Network Operations Manager ** Colorado Valley Telephone Cooperative ** (979) 247-8163 ** brianv@cvtv.net ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From danko at sezampro.yu Tue Dec 19 11:28:28 2000 From: danko at sezampro.yu (Danko Jevtovic) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi, >First, the E1 layer. Are you seeing the E1 come up at all? We use T1, >and I'm not sure of the specific differences (other than speed), but >to cross one over just set up with the same signalling on each side >and set one to Clock Source=Yes and the other to No. I seen all channels on E1 as nailed, and I have configured Clock Source correctly. I use PPP (mulit link). On Wan stats only TX packets going out and Connection profiles tries to connects, but fails with LCP timeout cause code (like two units do not see each other). Thanks for suggestion, Danko ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Tue Dec 19 11:36:15 2000 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > >First, the E1 layer. Are you seeing the E1 come up at all? We use T1, >>and I'm not sure of the specific differences (other than speed), but >>to cross one over just set up with the same signalling on each side >>and set one to Clock Source=Yes and the other to No. > >I seen all channels on E1 as nailed, and I have configured Clock Source >correctly. > >I use PPP (mulit link). On Wan stats only TX packets going out and >Connection profiles tries to connects, but fails with LCP timeout cause code >(like two units do not see each other). It should be straight PPP--not MP or MPP. This might be misleading you because you're using all the DS0s on the E1, but it's not actually multilink as far as the Maxen are concerned. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From danko at sezampro.yu Tue Dec 19 14:03:57 2000 From: danko at sezampro.yu (Danko Jevtovic) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Thank. Point noted. I will try to recheck all parameters tomorrow. -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Peter Lalor Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 6:36 PM To: Danko Jevtovic Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: RE: (ASCEND) MAX to MAX connection > >First, the E1 layer. Are you seeing the E1 come up at all? We use T1, >>and I'm not sure of the specific differences (other than speed), but >>to cross one over just set up with the same signalling on each side >>and set one to Clock Source=Yes and the other to No. > >I seen all channels on E1 as nailed, and I have configured Clock Source >correctly. > >I use PPP (mulit link). On Wan stats only TX packets going out and >Connection profiles tries to connects, but fails with LCP timeout cause code >(like two units do not see each other). It should be straight PPP--not MP or MPP. This might be misleading you because you're using all the DS0s on the E1, but it's not actually multilink as far as the Maxen are concerned. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tom at rydrcom.com Tue Dec 19 13:59:54 2000 From: tom at rydrcom.com (Tom Ryder) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend For Sale Message-ID: Hello List, The following $7M+ lease of equipment has been terminated and is being returned. If interested in anything, please contact us. Thank you. 11030 11031 11041 11093 11401A 11058 40061 59009A 59018-16 59019 59027-16 59028D 59035 59072-16 59073 59087A-16 59087B-16 59088 59094B-16 59095 59105M 90010 GRF-A6-AC GRF-AC-AC16 GRF-AC-AC16 GRF-MC-HSSI GRF-MC-AOC3 GRF-MC-EN8 GRF-MC-FDDI GRF-MEM-64 GRF-MEM-128 CS-PREM-5001BND CS-PREM-B9090BND CS-PREM-GRF16BND CS-HWUPG-13009 CS-PREM-GRF1600 Tom Ryder RYDER Communications, Inc. 35B Wilson Drive Sparta, NJ 07871-3427 Tel. 973-940-7350 / 1-877-RYDRCOM x222 FAX. 973-940-7355 / 1-877-RYDRFAX tom@rydrcom.com www.rydrcom.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tom at rydrcom.com Thu Dec 21 10:21:46 2000 From: tom at rydrcom.com (Tom Ryder) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend for sale Message-ID: Ascend TNT Units Part# Description Qty per unit Price Qty Available TNT-2AC-H TNT Dual High Output AC Base Chassis 1 TNT-SL-E10-100 Ethernet Slot Card 1 TNT-SL-CT3 Channelized T3 Module 1 TNT-SL-48MOD V3-S-C Single Slot 48 Voice upgrd Modems 14 Asking Price $TBD 8 Description TNT-2AC-H TNT Dual High Output AC Base Chassis 1 TNT-SL-E10-100 Ethernet Slot Card 1 TNT-SL-CT3 Channelized T3 Module 1 TNT-SL-48MOD-SGL Single Slot 48 Voice upgrd Modems 14 Asking Price $TBD 3 Description TNT-2AC-H TNT Dual High Output AC Base Chassis 1 TNT-SL-100 Ethernet Slot card 1 TNT-SL-CT1 8pt T1 card 2 TNT-SL-48MOD-SGL Single Slot 48 modems 8 Asking Price $TBD 6 Piece Parts TNT -2AC TNT Chassis dual power supply $TBD 2 TNT SL HA 192 HA 192 cards $TBD 2 TNT-SL-48MOD-S56 48Pt 56k modems Double Height $TBD 20 TNT-SL-48MOD V3-S-C Single Slot 48 modems $TBD 4 TNT-SL-CT1 8Pt T1 card $TBD 6 Tom Ryder RYDER Communications, Inc. 35B Wilson Drive Sparta, NJ 07871-3427 Tel. 973-940-7350 / 1-877-RYDRCOM x222 FAX. 973-940-7355 / 1-877-RYDRFAX tom@rydrcom.com www.rydrcom.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Fri Dec 22 16:19:23 2000 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) OSPF not workin' anymore Message-ID: Dear folks, got a Max 4000 here that had an uptime of 465! days before we needed to reboot it due to a change of power supply at the rack. From that on, the OSPF is not workin' properly anymore. The Max advertises only his own Primary IP Address as a host-route (e.g. 192.168.1.1/32) to the OSPF neighbor (a Cisco). Before, the Max advertised all static routes and /32 dialup-routes to the router. I checked so many settings that I am definitely not willing to search any further but I really need some sort of help. As an interim solution I set several static routes on the Cisco pointing to the Max but that ain't a great solution for our environment. Thanks for everything! Sascha ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From grs at grv.com.au Sun Dec 24 07:02:24 2000 From: grs at grv.com.au (Gary Smith) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <488242141.20001225000224@grv.com.au> test ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cclements at cp-tel.net Wed Dec 27 12:03:49 2000 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Trunk Group Parameters from DMS 10 to Lucent MAX. Message-ID: <4.2.2.20001227120101.00a26700@cp-tel.net> Gurus, Have any of you guys had any experience in configuring a MAX 6000 to answer calls from a DMS 10 Trunk group. This is an AMI Channelized T1. We have several answering calls on T1s from Siemens switches. Are there major differences? Chris Clements ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Wed Dec 27 17:08:12 2000 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX4048's Message-ID: <067701c07059$e2ca8fa0$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> Hello all, Happy holidays. Dial up season is here........so add more ports. We have several Ascend MAX4048's in stock and ready to ship. We will sell whole units or just spare cards. Each unit has (3) MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards in it. We are trying to get our inventory down by the end of the year....so if you need some...make us a resonable offer and we'll see what we can do. Warmest Regards, Scott Woodland Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20001227/c1911f98/attachment.htm From dave at mi-web.com Thu Dec 28 17:19:44 2000 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) [OT] National Dialups Message-ID: Hi there. Sorry for the OT, but we need to act in a hurry, and I figured someone here would know where to point me. The company we were using for reselling national diaups has gone belly up and gave us just a few days notice before they'll be cutting off access. What we want to do is set up a couple/few of our customers up with another form of access just as an end user type account. Anyone out there offering national numbers, or know of who I could send them to? I think the company we were using went through Cable & Wireless, which covered most of what we needed for just a few accounts. Thanks. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From aspicer at ifxcorp.com Thu Dec 28 22:55:49 2000 From: aspicer at ifxcorp.com (Alan Spicer) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) [OT] National Dialups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Perhaps you could try: MegaPOP www.megapop.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dave Higgins > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 18:20 Alan S. > To: Ascend Users > Subject: (ASCEND) [OT] National Dialups > > > Hi there. > > Sorry for the OT, but we need to act in a hurry, and I figured > someone here > would know where to point me. > > The company we were using for reselling national diaups has gone belly up > and gave us just a few days notice before they'll be cutting off access. > What we want to do is set up a couple/few of our customers up with another > form of access just as an end user type account. > > Anyone out there offering national numbers, or know of who I > could send them > to? I think the company we were using went through Cable & Wireless, which > covered most of what we needed for just a few accounts. > > Thanks. > > Dave. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From wayne at ojai.net Fri Dec 29 00:51:05 2000 From: wayne at ojai.net (Wayne Maynard) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) [OT] National Dialups References: Message-ID: <001801c07163$b7285a70$6501a8c0@alliancetqes4h> I use MegaPOP as a backup system just incase my 4000's take a dump and I got to move customers over. Only had to use it once because of a telco PRI problem. Anyway they require $500 minimum per month and that will provide up to 58 or 60 dialup accounts for your users at $8.50 each. Each of their POP's seem to have different levels of quality, I get customers who can connect to one but not another....go figure. They must be using USR Total Control. > Perhaps you could try: MegaPOP > www.megapop.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dave Higgins > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 18:20 Alan S. > > To: Ascend Users > > Subject: (ASCEND) [OT] National Dialups > > > > > > Hi there. > > > > Sorry for the OT, but we need to act in a hurry, and I figured > > someone here > > would know where to point me. > > > > The company we were using for reselling national diaups has gone belly up > > and gave us just a few days notice before they'll be cutting off access. > > What we want to do is set up a couple/few of our customers up with another > > form of access just as an end user type account. > > > > Anyone out there offering national numbers, or know of who I > > could send them > > to? I think the company we were using went through Cable & Wireless, which > > covered most of what we needed for just a few accounts. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Dave. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: