From tom at ispstuff.com Wed Aug 1 09:40:11 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Max 6096 - $6200 OBO Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010801094011.0315692c@mail.rockriver.net> We still have a couple of Max 6096 remote access servers left in the 964xxxx serial number range. They are in excellent condition, very clean, tested, and guaranteed for 90 days. In stock and ready to ship today. These are the single AC power supply model with 4 T1 interfaces and 6 of the 16 port 56k modem cards for a total of 96 modems. Installed options include ISDN/FR/DC/DS and global digital access. $6200 each OBO. Call 815-968-9888 or contact us by email. Thanks, Tom PS We were using these in our ISP operation and can answer most tech questions about them. We can also make them available for telnet if you would like a look. We recently switched to a Max TNT. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Aug 1 19:10:18 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Troubleshooting CLID callback on TNT Message-ID: We have ISDN customers for whom we provide CLID-based callback: when traffic for their subnet arrives, we place a call to their router. Their router refuses the call, saving the toll charge, and calls back. Works like a charm. My question relates to determining why a particular call was placed, as one would do with wddialout on a Pipeline. A customer is reporting that the link is being brought up from our side a lot, and we'd like to look into why. Given the timing, I'd guess Code Red scans, but I'd still like to see the traffic so I can determine if an appropriate call filter can be built. On that note, does anyone have a stock call filter they use for this sort of thing? In this age of continuous scanning, it seems prudent to have restrictive call filters in place. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Thu Aug 2 05:40:23 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Zero-length UDP packet filter? References: <200108010545.WAA04898@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3B692E17.6542DBD1@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Hi Peter, right, a generic filter is needed because the built-in IP filter only looks at (src|dst) addresses and ports, not the packet length. A UDP packet is embedded in an IP packet, i.e. the IP header comes first, then the UDP header, then the UDP data if any. The filter has to check 2 values: a) from the IP header, it checks if the packet is an UDP packet b) from the UDP header it checks the length field So we chain 2 filters (More=Yes in the first filter). OK let's go. The 10th byte in the IP header contains the protocol type ID byte which for UDP must be 17 dec = 0x11. Filters Name=filter-name Input filters... In filter 01 Generic... Forward=No Offset=9 Length=1 Mask=FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Value=11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Compare=Equals More=Yes Now the UDP part. The header is 8 bytes long, byte 5+6 contain the length of the UDP packet in bytes _including_ the header. So the minimum length is 8 dec=0x8. In filter 02 Generic... Forward=No Offset=24 Length=2 Mask=FF FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 Value=00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 Compare=Equals More=No And at last the ususal forward all... In filter 03 Generic... Forward=Yes Offset=0 Length=0 Mask=00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Value=00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 Compare=Equals More=No Comments: 1. For all offsets I assume that the ASCEND filters deal with IP packets. IP packets carry an Ethernet header of 14 bytes length which I did not take into account. I am too dumb to find this piece of information in the ASCEND docs. 2. The IP header length _usually_ is 20 bytes but can be longer. Bits 5-8 of the IP header contain the number of bytes of the IP header and are assumed to be 0x5 here. AFAIK we cannot read this value to use it as an offset in a filter. Workaround: test this value and branch if not equal to 0x5. Do not mention fragmentation which may occur with UDP packets. 3. And yes, while writing this, the length of the IP datagram is also contained in the IP header itself (byte 3+4). We could test this for a value of 28 dec=0x1C. Again, if the IP header contains options the header itself will be longer than this and the filter will fail. Advantage: less CPU load. By sheer coincidence ASCEND allows to test for 8 byte values and the two fields span 8 bytes exactly: In filter 01 Generic... Forward=No Offset=2 Length=8 Mask=FF FF 00 00 00 00 00 FF Value=00 1C 00 00 00 00 00 11 Compare=Equals More=No followed by the forward-all filter as above. 4. Decide for Input or Output filter yourself depending on which interface you apply it to. 5. All information from the excellent "TCP/IP Illustrated, Vol. 1" by W. Richard Stevens, Addison-Wesley, pages 34 and 144. Best regards, Wolfgang Peter Lalor wrote: > I need to write a filter to drop zero-length UDP packets. I believe > this can be done with a generic filter, but I haven't played with > those for awhile. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Netzwerk-Design Remote Access und WAN-L?sungen Storage-L?sungen (RAID, libraries, NAS/SAN) COMPAQ Server und PC Windows NT Implementation und Administration Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jhandy at migkap.com Thu Aug 2 19:20:02 2001 From: Jhandy at migkap.com (Handy, Jack) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) redundant connection pofiles Message-ID: <766860489962D511B77000034708173004679D@MAIL1> This is probably a really easy one... The equipment involved is a Max 1800 on one end and a Max 3000 on the other. I have created two connection profiles with different preference ratings and the Max 1800 always picks the profile with the lowest preference. The preference info is in the static routes section of the Max where I have the same two routesIf I disable the connection profile that has the lowest preference it dials the alternate one instead, just as intended. However, if I create a situation where the primary connection profile cannot connect (i.e. introduce bogus phone number), the Max doesn't give up on that one and try the next one. What I want it to do is to dial the second profile if the first one can't be reached. Can anyone help with this? Thanks, Jack Handy jhandy@migkap.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jhandy at migkap.com Thu Aug 2 19:22:18 2001 From: Jhandy at migkap.com (Handy, Jack) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FW: connection profile adding number Message-ID: <766860489962D511B77000034708173004679E@MAIL1> > Hello, > > I am using a Max 1800 (TAOS 7.0.22)dialing out to a Pipeline (75 > TAOS6.1.44) and although the initial dialout goes fine, when the router > tries to add the second B channel to the call it is inserting a number > like this: > > instead of dialing 4 9 12125551234 > > its dialing 4 9 122125551234 > > where 4 is the trunk group and 9 is to get an outside line and the > connection is MPP (It doesn't do this with MP and BACP on) > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Jack > jhandy@migkap.com > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From natecars at real-time.com Fri Aug 3 12:37:13 2001 From: natecars at real-time.com (Nate Carlson) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Multiple Radius Servers Message-ID: Howdy, Just want to confirm that on a Max 4000, if you specify multiple Radius servers in the Auth menu, that it will only fall over to the secondary/tertiary if the first one is not accessible. Is this correct? Thanks! -- Nate Carlson | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rwdozier at apex2000.net Fri Aug 3 09:25:00 2001 From: rwdozier at apex2000.net (Bob Dozier) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hey - look at this! Message-ID: <001b01c11c28$1441a300$154212cf@apex2000.net> _____________________________________________________________________ Bob Dozier rwdozier@apex2000.net Apex 2000 Internet Services Corporation Phone: (915) 570-1676 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: secmbox3+codered@UU.NET Subject: Code Red Worm Detected Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 12:30:56 GMT Size: 2425 Url: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010803/f1b0850c/CodeRedWormDetected.eml From justinmonroe69 at hotmail.com Fri Aug 3 12:08:51 2001 From: justinmonroe69 at hotmail.com (Justin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Have You Heard!!!! Message-ID: <20010803170506.VZXZ1457.femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[24.176.151.185]> I wanted to let you know about this service I found, I have not needed to go to the video store. I have been able to find and download full length newly realesed Movies, and Music, Music videos to, I have even found Video games. And once you download all these things they are saved to your hard drive and they are yours to keep for ever! I only pay $3.95 a month for all this, if you have a CD burner you can even burn the Movies,Music and shear them with your friends they will be able to watch the movies on there CD rom drives. P.S. I paid $9.00 for two sodas last week at the theater!!! http://www.onlinemoviesandmore.com NEVER SEND SPAM. IT IS BAD. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From roddy at staff.satlink.com.au Mon Aug 6 18:58:53 2001 From: roddy at staff.satlink.com.au (Roddy Strachan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 2e1 or 4e1? Message-ID: <00eb01c11ed3$bf239f00$1e00a8c0@glasgowrangers.com.tj> Hi, Is there a way to find out from a Lucent max 6000 wether it is a 2e1 or 4e1 model? Anyway by logging into the box or by looking at? --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From roddy at staff.satlink.com.au Mon Aug 6 19:43:20 2001 From: roddy at staff.satlink.com.au (Roddy Strachan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Modem card Message-ID: <012701c11ed9$f4ce93c0$1e00a8c0@glasgowrangers.com.tj> Hi, Just wondering if anyone could shed any light on the following. One of our modem cards is failed to recognise in a Max 6000, however when I put the same card into a different Max, it picks it up no problems. Ive tried changing slots etc. Any ideas? --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ez.rodriguez at codetel.net.do Tue Aug 7 08:40:27 2001 From: ez.rodriguez at codetel.net.do (ez.rodriguez@codetel.net.do) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) OSPF problem in APX 8000 and MAX TNT Message-ID: <28b401c11f46$84bdaf40$515103c4@codetel.net> Hi we need to configure OSPF in the APX 8000 that we have installed here. We've tried to put in function this routing protocol, but without sucess. We need to know what parameters exactly we have to set to communicate the APX's with a Cisco router troughout OSPF routing Protocol, using the fasthernet port. We activate the OSPF in IP-GLOBAL directory and in the Fasthernet Interface, specifying the area that we going to use. We need help about this because we have move all the possible parameters an we don't reach anything. Thaks .- Ezequiel Rodriguez E. - CCNA Data Engineer Department CODETEL, Verizon Co. Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep. Tel (809) 220-7784 e-mail : ez.rodriguez@codetel.net.do ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From srivera at wrca.net Tue Aug 7 11:41:15 2001 From: srivera at wrca.net (Steve Rivera -www.wrca.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Lucent / Ascend TNT gear Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20010807124024.01aff110@mail.wrca.net> WRCA.NET has the following Ascend Hardware available for immediate shipment. Prices are negotiable :) All equipment is NEW condition. All Ascend TNT gear posted ships with 1 year warranty. If you need more information feel free to contact me at srivera@wrca.net NEW IN CRATE: MAX TNT- Dual AC...includes the following Shelf Controller, Memory and TNT-E100-E/C (Latest Version) $3500.00 NEW IN BOX: TNT-CT3 $1500 NEW IN BOX: APX8-SL-96DSP $7500 NEW in BOX TNT-SP-AC-H Refurbished: TNT-48MOD-S-C TNT-48MOD-SGL TNT-48MOD-s56 http://www.wrca.net Worldwide Provider of Network Hardware since 1981 Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 srivera@wrca.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jeff_Owens at cargill.com Tue Aug 7 14:45:05 2001 From: Jeff_Owens at cargill.com (Jeff_Owens@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 2000 Ringing Busy Message-ID: I have a Max 2000 running 7.2.3 that periodically will start ringing busy on all ports. fatal-history has a recurring 195 index warning. I'm wondering if anyone has seen this before, and could it be due to a bad modem card? Below is the fatal-history output: SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 01/25/2001. Time: 12:05:14 FATAL ERROR: Index: 1 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 03/02/2001. Time: 15:13:22 Location: b0002388 b02ae67c b01d2e84 b02ae640 b0001d14 b00883e4 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 03/02/2001. Time: 15:15:19 OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 03/22/2001. Time: 04:20:01 DEBUG Reset from unknown in security profile 1. SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 03/22/2001. Time: 04:21:16 WARNING: Index: 195 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 04/11/2001. Time: 22:22:38 Location: b00b3570 b00b36c4 b01121b0 b0112b5c b0113784 b0111404 FATAL ERROR: Index: 1 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 04/22/2001. Time: 11:43:50 Location: b00024d4 b02ae67c b01d2e84 b02ae640 b0001d14 b00883e4 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 04/22/2001. Time: 11:45:46 WARNING: Index: 195 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 05/25/2001. Time: 03:56:38 Location: b00b3570 b00b36c4 b01121b0 b0112b5c b0113784 b0111404 OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 07/18/2001. Time: 09:11:14 DEBUG Reset from unknown in security profile 1. SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 07/18/2001. Time: 09:12:28 WARNING: Index: 195 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 07/19/2001. Time: 04:13:47 Location: b00b3570 b00b36c4 b01121b0 b0112b5c b0113784 b0111404 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m20 Revision: 7.2.3 Date: 08/04/2001. Time: 22:52:16 Jeff Cargill ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Wed Aug 8 02:03:56 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] 2e1 or 4e1? Message-ID: <001901c11fd8$4a9ffb00$164783d5@ahakim2> You need to log on the box and try to get in 20-000 Net/E1 if you see message "interface not available" then your box is 2 E1 if you could get in then you your box is 4 E1 Ahmad EL-Hakim From ahakim at link.net Wed Aug 8 02:06:21 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Modem card Message-ID: <002101c11fd8$a0d5fce0$164783d5@ahakim2> MAX will not detect more than one card type, if you are trying to add more cards. Is the card was there and failed, or you are adding a new one. Ahmad EL-Hakim From rocca at multiboard.com Wed Aug 8 09:40:06 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] re: (ASCEND) Max 2000 Ringing Busy In-Reply-To: <200108080545.WAA09770@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: > I have a Max 2000 running 7.2.3 that periodically will start ringing > busy on all ports. fatal-history has a recurring 195 index warning. > I'm wondering if anyone has seen this before, and could it be due to a > bad modem card? Are you using PRI and it happens near full load? ...if so I had a similar problem. Warning, long story: We have a bunch of PRI's but they roll not hunt across the groups, our first PRI is serviced by a 2000, the rest are on 4000's -- but our first 23 callers always hit the 2000. What we found is when that box got almost near capacity, say 22 lines in use, and someone calls and forgets their password (or has some other connection problem) they try about 8 or 9 times and both of the last two modems get 4 or 5 bad calls in a row logged against them. One gets taken out of the queue, then the other one and now you have 22 modems and 23 lines and as soon as you don't have an available modem for a call the max answers with a busy tone -- it doesn't take long to flag the rest as bad when that happens as after a few modems on one card get flagged, that whole card gets quiesced until all lines on it are free and it does a card reset. Because we're roll not hunt in this area it effectively took out our queue on all but the first 12 lines which were on another card. We originally thought "hardware fault" but it all started happening a couple weeks after upgrading from 7.0.4 to 7.2.3, so we downgraded to 7.0.26 still had the same problem and went back to 7.0.4 which has been working flawless since. (knock on wood) I'm not sure if this works because 7.0.4 doesn't have the same behavior about taking out modems, different modem code, or we've just been lucky, although I doubt the later as this problem has only happened during the times I had other loads on. In my experience, the code I've found best on the MAX's are: MAX 2000 7.0.4, load ftik.m20 MAX 4000 7.0.26, load ftik.m40 Good luck. :-) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hkruell at swd-ag.de Wed Aug 8 17:41:18 2001 From: hkruell at swd-ag.de (hkruell@swd-ag.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] re: (ASCEND) Modem card Message-ID: <41256AA2.007C849A.00@svbk01.hv.swd-ag.de> hello, are the softwareversions the same in the max with and without problems, some of the modemcards only works with a defined version. I had such a problem to sometimes ago with two max tnt. heribert kruell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roddy Strachan" To: "Ascend" Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:43 AM Subject: (ASCEND) Modem card > Hi, > > Just wondering if anyone could shed any light on the following. > > One of our modem cards is failed to recognise in a Max 6000, however when I > put the same card into a different Max, it picks it up no problems. > > Ive tried changing slots etc. > > Any ideas? > --- > Cheers, > > R. Strachan > Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. > Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 > Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 > Email. roddy@satlink.com.au > rod_gers1873@yahoo.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From brian at net-port.com Thu Aug 9 00:05:42 2001 From: brian at net-port.com (Brian Goodenow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX6000 Modems Message-ID: I have a situation where many dial-up users on my MAX6000 and MAX TNT are having trouble connecting, and / or connecting at unusually slow speeds. I have found this to be true for my personal account as well.. When I dial into either box, I fail to connect or get sub-par speeds. Also, when it does connect, I'm unable to ping any servers, etc.. However, many other customers are able to connect with no trouble - so it's not a global problem.. I have a MAX4048 which I can dial into with no problems, so I don't believe it's my phone line.. Any suggestions on where to begin? The TNT is running version 7.0.4, the 6000 is on 8.0.3, and the 4048 is on 6.1.3. Thanks! Brian Goodenow, Manager Net-port Internet Service 110 N. Michigan Ave. Big Rapids, MI 49307 231.592.9877, ext. 204 www.net-port.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From equipment at cubexs.net.pk Thu Aug 9 07:12:57 2001 From: equipment at cubexs.net.pk (Aly Ramzan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT & Multiple RADIUS Servers References: Message-ID: <000701c120cc$a116d590$23c03fca@REDHAT> Dear All, Is it possible to operate single MAX TNT with multiple authentication & accounting servers. We would like to assign each PRI port or PRI module a different Radius machine. Thanks, Aly Ramzan CubeXS ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rydrcom at yahoo.com Thu Aug 9 10:51:33 2001 From: rydrcom at yahoo.com (Ryder Communications) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT-SP-SC Question Message-ID: <20010809155133.3130.qmail@web14307.mail.yahoo.com> Does anyone know how to tell the rev level of a TNT-SP-SC without powering it up. Would the serial or part numbers tell you anything. I would appreciate any help that I could get. Thanks, Brian Braisted RYDER Communications, Inc. Wide Area Networking Solutions 35B Wilson Drive Sparta, NJ 07871-3427 Tel. 973-940-7350 / 1-877-RYDRCOM x227 FAX. 973-940-7355 / 1-877-RYDRFAX brian@rydrcom.com www.rydrcom.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From GoodEmails at bigfoot.com Fri Aug 10 05:47:24 2001 From: GoodEmails at bigfoot.com (GoodEmails@bigfoot.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Email Lists For Sale - Auth. Code # 1234456 Message-ID: <0997440608.0718954589@> Extensive Email Lists for Sale This great list is only $89.95 plus $5.00 (USD) for shipping and handling. Imagine being able to contact millions of people about your product and services without incurring huge costs... · Reach up to 56 million people with one direct email. · Use the email as a marketing tool to help your business flourish. · No more paper mailings or postage costs. · Emails can be targeted to specific groups to insure a greater response rate and increased sales. Buy this list now and only pay $89.95(USD) for a list of 56 million email addresses. All addresses are current, verified and legitimate. If you would like to take advantage of this offer please contact Joyce Gellar at 480-517-1084 and have your Auth. Code # ready. ***** If no one answers please leave a message with a name, number and best time to contact and we will get back to you as soon as we can. ******************************************************* We respect your Online Privacy. This is not an unsolicited mail. Under Bill s.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress We are sorry for the inconvenience caused to you. ******************************************************* *** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at just4.com Fri Aug 10 13:32:14 2001 From: dave at just4.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? Message-ID: Looking for suggestions on a router/switch that would be capable of handling our load without going way overkill. 192 modems (4 units) with around 100 - 120 in use at peak 7 low traffic Web servers 1000 user mail server T1 for outbound bandwidth. Expansion beyond this is always hopeful, but not forseen for quite some time. Looking through Cisco site but I'm not real strong in the know-how of what should handle this load, and we're trying not to over-buy for what we need. Thanks. Dave ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dfl at chudys.com Sat Aug 11 12:21:19 2001 From: dfl at chudys.com (Darkshot's Lists) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6K-4K SS7? Message-ID: <9014040415.20010811132119@chudys.com> I remember seeing something about this some time ago, but don't remember. Is it possible to use IMTs on Max 4K amd 6K units? Is there a card, or....what? Thanks! 'Shot ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From vbranyik at piopc.com Sat Aug 11 22:39:36 2001 From: vbranyik at piopc.com (Vilmos Branyik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Problem telneting into 4048 Message-ID: Sorry for what I think is a very basic question. I have a 4048 that has been in service for some time. All of the sudden I can't telnet into the box. Even when I connect to it and change the password I can't get in. I haven't tried a reset yet (I'm trying to avoid one) as this is my primary dial-up access router. I've gone through the docs. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this. Thanks for any suggestions. V. Branyik ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Aug 11 23:23:25 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: For the switch, go for a 2900 or a 3500. For the router, a 3620 would do fine. With internal CSUs and maxing the memory, you can run up to 4 T1s (partial views if you do BGP) for a total of 6mb of transit. If you outgrow the 3620, the modules can be moved to a 3640 or even a 3660. All of this can be found on the used market for very reasonable prices. Cisco's used market is great because Cisco has a thing called smartnet that you can buy, and they will do next-day replacement, no matter how you came accross their equipment. My vendor of choice is Millenium Solutions, from whom I've purchased several routers, switches, a couple of TNTs, etc... Call Eric at 800.801.2001 x245, tell him I sent you. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dave Higgins ** Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:32 PM ** To: Ascend Users ** Subject: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? ** ** ** Looking for suggestions on a router/switch that would be capable ** of handling ** our load without going way overkill. ** ** 192 modems (4 units) with around 100 - 120 in use at peak ** 7 low traffic Web servers ** 1000 user mail server ** ** T1 for outbound bandwidth. ** ** Expansion beyond this is always hopeful, but not forseen for quite some ** time. ** ** Looking through Cisco site but I'm not real strong in the ** know-how of what ** should handle this load, and we're trying not to over-buy for ** what we need. ** ** Thanks. ** ** Dave ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Sun Aug 12 00:23:24 2001 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (netlink@netlinkcorp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Problem telneting into 4048 References: Message-ID: <3B7612CC.44E4@netlinkcorp.com> I have had this happen to me and the only way I could clear it was to reset the box in the offhours. May not be what you want to hear but this fixed the situation. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Vilmos Branyik wrote: > > Sorry for what I think is a very basic question. > > I have a 4048 that has been in service for some time. All of the sudden I > can't telnet into the box. Even when I connect to it and change the password > I can't get in. > > I haven't tried a reset yet (I'm trying to avoid one) as this is my primary > dial-up access router. > > I've gone through the docs. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix > this. > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > V. Branyik > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Sun Aug 12 02:18:20 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT & Multiple RADIUS Servers Message-ID: <004c01c122fe$f74f2000$094783d5@ahakim2> You can use NavisRADIUS 3.2 version as proxy server. It has something called policy flow in which you define how you want your auth to be. You can tell the AAA server to look in the auth packet for any parameter and upon a match you can direct it to another AAA server. Ahmad EL-Hakim From equipment at cubexs.net.pk Sun Aug 12 04:50:56 2001 From: equipment at cubexs.net.pk (Aly Ramzan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT & Multiple RADIUS Servers References: <004c01c122fe$f74f2000$094783d5@ahakim2> Message-ID: <001101c12314$4a35ea50$7dc03fca@banshee> Thanks, we will look it up in RadiusNT. Regards, Aly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ahmad EL-Hakim" To: "Ascend Mailing List" Cc: Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 12:18 PM Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT & Multiple RADIUS Servers > You can use NavisRADIUS 3.2 version as proxy server. It has something called > policy flow in which you define how you want your auth to be. You can tell > the AAA server to look in the auth packet for any parameter and upon a match > you can direct it to another AAA server. > > Ahmad EL-Hakim > > > From gdaley at lucent.com Sun Aug 12 19:31:29 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Problem telneting into 4048 Message-ID: It may be that you have themaximum number of telnet sessions already logged into the box. This could be the case since the telnet connections do not use TCP keepalives, and if you 'quit' a client telnet application, rather than 'close', then the connection state can be left up. I believe that there is an idle parameter in some MAXes which allows invalid connections to be timed out. This is in System>Sys Config>Idle Logout If the parameter is set to 0 then idle logouts are disabled. setting it to any value up to 60 will give the number of minutes which an inactive Telnet connection will stay around for. Do this before you reset the box. (or after you reset it the first time, during the same outage). Otherwise, it may occur again in the future. I believe that a reset must occur for this change to take effect. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Vilmos Branyik [mailto:vbranyik@piopc.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 1:40 PM > To: 'ascend-users@max.bungi.com' > Subject: (ASCEND) Problem telneting into 4048 > > > Sorry for what I think is a very basic question. > > I have a 4048 that has been in service for some time. All of > the sudden I > can't telnet into the box. Even when I connect to it and > change the password > I can't get in. > > I haven't tried a reset yet (I'm trying to avoid one) as this > is my primary > dial-up access router. > > I've gone through the docs. Does anyone have any suggestions > on how to fix > this. > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > V. Branyik > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ESTER1412 at hotmail.com Sun Aug 12 19:49:26 2001 From: ESTER1412 at hotmail.com (ESTER1412@hotmail.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) A Vacation on us! .. Message-ID: <200108130133.SAA02640@max.bungi.com> You have been specially selected to qualify for the following: Premium Vacation Package and Pentium PC Giveaway To review the details of the please click on the link with the confirmation number below: http://vacation.1xin.net Confirmation Number#Lh340 Please confirm your entry within 24 hours of receipt of this confirmation. Wishing you a fun filled vacation! If you should have any additional questions or cann't connect to the site do not hesitate to contact me direct: mailto:vacation@btamail.net.cn?subject=Help! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Shaun.Ledford at morganstanley.com Mon Aug 13 08:07:13 2001 From: Shaun.Ledford at morganstanley.com (Shaun Ledford) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4000HP Message-ID: <3B77D101.BE5BF561@morganstanley.com> All: Anyone know if the Max 4000 can be upgraded to do DSL? Does Ascend/Lucent have some kind trade in program. ( A long shot I know. ) Any info will be appreciated. Thanks Shaun. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net Mon Aug 13 10:03:41 2001 From: jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Troy Settle wrote: >All of this can be found on the used market for very reasonable prices. >Cisco's used market is great because Cisco has a thing called smartnet that >you can buy, and they will do next-day replacement, no matter how you came >accross their equipment. I'll warn you this is not true. Cisco has refused to allow us to place any equipment not purchased directly from Cisco on a support contract. And I've talked to people at Cisco -- they don't like the policy either. If you buy used Cisco gear, buy spares at the same time. --Ricky ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jfischer at supercollider.com Mon Aug 13 10:48:01 2001 From: jfischer at supercollider.com (James Fischer) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? Message-ID: <01C123ED.CE930F10@gollum.supercollider.com> Ricky Beam said: >> Troy Settle wrote: >> All of this can be found on the used market for very reasonable prices. >> Cisco's used market is great because Cisco has a thing called smartnet that >> you can buy, and they will do next-day replacement, no matter how you came >> accross their equipment. > I'll warn you this is not true. Cisco has refused to allow us to place > any equipment not purchased directly from Cisco on a support contract. > And I've talked to people at Cisco -- they don't like the policy either. This seems silly - what with resellers, dealers, system integrators, and other "middlemen", how is Cisco to know "new" versus "used"? I have never had Cisco refuse to put ANY of their gear on a support contract, and I even (gasp!) have traded gear with my peers with wild abandon. jim ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net Mon Aug 13 11:48:23 2001 From: jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? In-Reply-To: <01C123ED.CE930F10@gollum.supercollider.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, James Fischer wrote: >> I'll warn you this is not true. Cisco has refused to allow us to place >> any equipment not purchased directly from Cisco on a support contract. >> And I've talked to people at Cisco -- they don't like the policy either. > >This seems silly - what with resellers, dealers, system integrators, and >other "middlemen", how is Cisco to know "new" versus "used"? They know to whom they are sending their hardware. Supposedly, dealers register all the equipment they sell. >I have never had Cisco refuse to put ANY of their gear on a support >contract, and I even (gasp!) have traded gear with my peers with >wild abandon. We have a 7206VXR they refuse to put under contract because we didn't buy it directly from Cisco. It's still under the contract of it's previous owner. And we have several other items under contract for which Cisco claims they have no records. (If I have to hold them at gun point to fix anything, what's the point in paying for support? Granted, Cisco is alot better than almost every other vendor...) And yes, it's a stupid policy. With all the failed "dot coms", there's a large market of "used" hardware -- some if it never having come out of the box. I'm sure Cisco isn't happy about all that cheap hardware that, in many cases, may have never been paid for. --Ricky ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Mon Aug 13 11:59:11 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? In-Reply-To: <01C123ED.CE930F10@gollum.supercollider.com> Message-ID: Agreed. I had a used 3620 that probably showed up broken, and after spending $180 on a smartnet contract, I got a next-day replacement for it. The replacment unit was refurbished, but is covered by that smartnet contract for a year. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: James Fischer [mailto:jfischer@supercollider.com] ** Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:48 AM ** To: 'Ricky Beam'; Troy Settle ** Cc: Dave Higgins; Ascend Users ** Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Router/Switch suggestions? ** ** ** Ricky Beam said: ** ** >> Troy Settle wrote: ** >> All of this can be found on the used market for very ** reasonable prices. ** >> Cisco's used market is great because Cisco has a thing called ** smartnet that ** >> you can buy, and they will do next-day replacement, no matter ** how you came ** >> accross their equipment. ** ** > I'll warn you this is not true. Cisco has refused to allow us to place ** > any equipment not purchased directly from Cisco on a support contract. ** > And I've talked to people at Cisco -- they don't like the ** policy either. ** ** This seems silly - what with resellers, dealers, system integrators, and ** other "middlemen", how is Cisco to know "new" versus "used"? ** ** I have never had Cisco refuse to put ANY of their gear on a support ** contract, and I even (gasp!) have traded gear with my peers with ** wild abandon. ** ** jim ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gordo at lucent.com Mon Aug 13 13:35:53 2001 From: gordo at lucent.com (Gordon Mackenzie) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 6K-4K SS7? References: <200108120545.WAA28518@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3B781E09.6030704@lucent.com> Cannot connect a 4000/6000 to SS7 network directly...Need to have it connected to a SS7 switch. Only thing you might be able to do is PRI-Tunneling, but that still requires intermediary gear. 4000/6000 doesn't understand IPDC. You need an APX or TNT for what you are inquiring about. > From: "Darkshot's Lists" > Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:21:19 -0400 > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 6K-4K SS7? > > I remember seeing something about this some time ago, but don't > remember. Is it possible to use IMTs on Max 4K amd 6K units? > Is there a card, or....what? > > Thanks! > > 'Shot ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Mon Aug 13 19:10:50 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 4000HP Message-ID: Please contact your Lucent reseller. they may have acces to deal and ordering information. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Shaun Ledford [mailto:Shaun.Ledford@morganstanley.com] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:07 PM > To: ascend > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4000HP > > > All: > > Anyone know if the Max 4000 can be upgraded to do DSL? > Does Ascend/Lucent have some kind trade in program. ( A long shot I > know. ) > > Any info will be appreciated. > > Thanks > Shaun. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl Tue Aug 14 04:22:30 2001 From: j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl (Jeroen Veen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 1600 Classic reset. Message-ID: Hiya, Does anyone know a way to reset a max 1600 classic to it's initial state? As in, without the long forgotten passwords it has stored somewhere in it's interiors at the moment. I think it's a Max 1600 Classic, the front of the case just has "MAX" printed on it. The underside of the case mentions MX2E1 on the sticker. It took a while before I found out that it's supposedly a MAX classic so I can now verify that shorting jumper 6 or 9 (as is part of the precedure for a MAX 4000) has no effect whatsoever on this thing. Any suggestions on what might work are greatly appreciated, Jeroen Veen Planet Media Group http://www.planet.nl ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Tue Aug 14 11:49:07 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: Max 4000HP In-Reply-To: <200108140545.WAA08714@max.bungi.com> References: <200108140545.WAA08714@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Shaun Ledford > >Anyone know if the Max 4000 can be upgraded to do DSL? >Does Ascend/Lucent have some kind trade in program. ( A long shot I >know. ) Over dry copper? Only IDSL. OTOH, I just purchased two Copper Mountain OnPrem 2400 DSLAMs on eBay for a grand apiece, so there are certainly options in these otherwise-dark days. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at just4.com Tue Aug 14 12:43:50 2001 From: dave at just4.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Quick radius check Message-ID: Hi there. Before we returned our leased TNT I used to use the "radauth username password" command to quick check if a user/pass combo was valid (on the radius machine, anyway). Is there a similar radius quick check command that I can use with a 4048 (or our soon to be online 6096)? I've tried looking through all the commands that are returned when asking for general help (?), but nothing stood out. Thanks. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Aug 14 18:04:32 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Quick radius check Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Higgins [mailto:dave@just4.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:44 AM > To: Ascend Users > Subject: (ASCEND) Quick radius check > > > Hi there. > > Before we returned our leased TNT I used to use the > "radauth username password" command to quick check if a > user/pass combo was > valid (on the radius machine, anyway). > > Is there a similar radius quick check command that I can use > with a 4048 (or > our soon to be online 6096)? I've tried looking through all > the commands > that are returned when asking for general help (?), but > nothing stood out. No, there is no radauth command on MAX. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mwiza at malawi.net Wed Aug 15 09:21:54 2001 From: mwiza at malawi.net (Mwiza Nyirenda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max Tnt Modem Resetting Message-ID: <004a01c12595$a2936cd0$02a994d0@two.malawi.net> I have two 48 modem cards in an Ascend Max TNT and it keep resetting the modems every few moments thereby disconnecting all the users connected. When I type brouterstats, I get errors on low memory. The memory goes as low as 200. When I reset the whole TNT I regain much memory, but I lose it rapidly within minutes as users connect. Any suggestions? Could there be a relation with the external radius server that I use? Regards Mwiza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010815/4b148f30/attachment.html From gordo at lucent.com Wed Aug 15 12:42:02 2001 From: gordo at lucent.com (Gordon Mackenzie) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 1600 Classic reset. References: <200108150545.WAA14062@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3B7AB46A.9040700@lucent.com> Wow...Max Classic still extant! I first started testing software upgrades with our then top of the line Max Classic as the Max ?HP? (later known as the 4000) came out. With the 4000 it's P2 or P1 you need to short (and I thought so for the 1600 as well, but see below...) Do this very carefully (I'm talking about step 1, be careful not to bend the LEDs, they are a bit of a pain to orient correctly into their wells in the faceplate otherwise) 1. With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the box and separate the 2 parts, the motherboard and the backplane. Orient the LEDs toward you (the front). 2. Locate the battery on the right side of the motherboard, toward the rear of the box, and insert a business card or similar non-conductive device between the battery and the contact. 3. Leave the card in place for about 5 minutes. This will allow enough time for the Max to "forget" its configuration. 4. Remove the card and reassemble the two parts, being careful to align the slots for the backplane with the card interface. 5. Reattach the power cable and serial cable. 6. Power up at 9600 N-8-1 no flow-control. 7. Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max. * Remember this will void any warranty you may possibly have on this unit * > From: Jeroen Veen > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:22:30 +0200 > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 1600 Classic reset. > > Hiya, > > Does anyone know a way to reset a max 1600 classic to it's initial state? As > in, without the long forgotten passwords it has stored somewhere in it's > interiors at the moment. > > I think it's a Max 1600 Classic, the front of the case just has "MAX" > printed on it. The underside of the case mentions MX2E1 on the sticker. > > It took a while before I found out that it's supposedly a MAX classic so I > can now verify that shorting jumper 6 or 9 (as is part of the precedure for > a MAX 4000) has no effect whatsoever on this thing. > > Any suggestions on what might work are greatly appreciated, > > Jeroen Veen > Planet Media Group > http://www.planet.nl -- Gordon Mackenzie (510) 747-2790 Software Quality Assurance < Alameda < Access Engineering < INS < Lucent mailto:gordo@lucent.com http://www.lucent.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Wed Aug 15 14:22:11 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disconnect Cause 120 Message-ID: All, Yesterday morning, we terminated our PRI into a TNT running 9.0.2 with a 8 port CT1 card and APX8-96DSP modem cards. In the afternoon, we switched to a TNT running 9.0.2 with a CT3 card and APX8-96DSP modem cards. We're having several customers getting a disconnect cause of 120: A TAOS unit received a call an allocated a modem to answer it. The dial-in client requested a protocol that is either disabled or unsupported on the TAOS unit or it's modem. For the life of me, I can't seem to find anything, anywhere regarding this. The configurations on the two TNTs are identical save for the way the PRI are coming in. We've been through the customers' modem configuration and have played with the settings, but there doesn't seem to be any help for it. Anyone have any suggestions on this? We've not yet been able to identify a specific brand or model of modem that's doing this. We've had 'standard modems,' HCF, and HSP modems so far. TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hartala80 at hotmail.com Thu Aug 16 02:57:49 2001 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) CPU Usage Message-ID: Hi All do anyone have an idea about how to measure CPU usage for the MAX TNT ? thx in advance _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jhandy at migkap.com Thu Aug 16 07:22:30 2001 From: Jhandy at migkap.com (Handy, Jack) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE:(ASCEND) All Natural Techniques That WILL Add 2-4 Inches! Message-ID: <766860489962D511B770000347081730046818@MAIL1> And all this time I thought Max referred to a remote access router! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jvenegas at adexus.cl Thu Aug 16 09:50:51 2001 From: jvenegas at adexus.cl (Jorge Venegas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) modem syncrhonous communication MAX Message-ID: <03256AAA.00518F7D.00@domino.adexus.cl> Hi I need to know if MAX answer call of modem syncrhonous........ and the protocol syncrhonous supported regards Jorge ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Thu Aug 16 10:53:34 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> How Lucent ruins great companies. Expect more layoffs. Ascend and Livingston will soon R.I.P. ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/MaxTNT/9.1.X/9.1.0/README for details. $13,400 MSRP for the 9.1.0 license on a TNT (less 50% from a reseller still sucks). Plus you also need to buy the new DSP cards and an annual maintenance contract is required for any further updates. I guess it is time to look for a way out of this Lucent BS. Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cmadams at HiWAAY.net Thu Aug 16 11:02:50 2001 From: cmadams at HiWAAY.net (Chris Adams) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net>; from tom@ispstuff.com on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:53:34AM -0500 References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> Once upon a time, ISPstuff said: > How Lucent ruins great companies. Expect more layoffs. Ascend and > Livingston will soon R.I.P. Livingston is already dead. > ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/MaxTNT/9.1.X/9.1.0/README for > details. > > $13,400 MSRP for the 9.1.0 license on a TNT (less 50% from a reseller still > sucks). Plus you also need to buy the new DSP cards and an annual > maintenance contract is required for any further updates. > > I guess it is time to look for a way out of this Lucent BS. We've looked (and are still looking), and for now, we're going to stick with our TNTs and the old modem cards (heck, we still have a lot of the two slot 56k cards). We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find (looking at 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From anssi.sallinen at jippiigroup.com Thu Aug 16 12:01:58 2001 From: anssi.sallinen at jippiigroup.com (Anssi Sallinen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> Message-ID: <3B7BFC86.645BC452@jippiigroup.com> Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, ISPstuff said: > > How Lucent ruins great companies. Expect more layoffs. Ascend and > We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find (looking at > 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. > Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( I must agree on you comments on PortMaster. Have you tested Nortel CVS? We are running a mixed system of TNT's, MAX'es and Nortel CVS's and I must say that we are quite happy with the Nortels. -- Anssi Sallinen - Network Engineer Jippii Group - http://www.jippiigroup.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sward at voltage.net Thu Aug 16 12:27:26 2001 From: sward at voltage.net (Susie Ward) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010816122651.01c0aa50@mail.voltage.net> At 11:02 AM 8/16/01 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >We've looked (and are still looking), and for now, we're going to stick >with our TNTs and the old modem cards (heck, we still have a lot of the >two slot 56k cards). > >We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find (looking at >3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. >Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( I don't think they have the density some of you require, but has anyone actually tried the Patton boxes? Susie ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From James at superbug.demon.co.uk Thu Aug 16 12:35:58 2001 From: James at superbug.demon.co.uk (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <3B7BFC86.645BC452@jippiigroup.com> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Anssi Sallinen > Sent: 16 August 2001 18:02 > To: Chris Adams > Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 > rip-off > > > Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, ISPstuff said: > > > How Lucent ruins great companies. Expect more layoffs. Ascend and > > We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find (looking at > > 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. > > Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( > > I must agree on you comments on PortMaster. Have you tested Nortel CVS? > We are running a mixed system of TNT's, MAX'es and Nortel CVS's and I > must say that we are quite happy with the Nortels. Nortel has stopped development on their NAS Platforms. I would be very cautious about buying Nortel at the moment. > > -- > Anssi Sallinen - Network Engineer > Jippii Group - http://www.jippiigroup.com > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cmadams at HiWAAY.net Thu Aug 16 12:49:08 2001 From: cmadams at HiWAAY.net (Chris Adams) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010816122651.01c0aa50@mail.voltage.net>; from sward@voltage.net on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:27:26PM -0500 References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> <5.0.2.1.2.20010816122651.01c0aa50@mail.voltage.net> Message-ID: <20010816124908.J13019@HiWAAY.net> Once upon a time, Susie Ward said: > I don't think they have the density some of you require, but has anyone > actually tried the Patton boxes? No OSPF, although their marketing apparently says they have it. The fact that they don't have it is bad; the fact that their marketing says they do (and apparently has said so for some time) is worse. -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cmadams at HiWAAY.net Thu Aug 16 12:48:08 2001 From: cmadams at HiWAAY.net (Chris Adams) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <3B7BFC86.645BC452@jippiigroup.com>; from anssi.sallinen@jippiigroup.com on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:01:58PM +0300 References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> <3B7BFC86.645BC452@jippiigroup.com> Message-ID: <20010816124808.I13019@HiWAAY.net> Once upon a time, Anssi Sallinen said: > Chris Adams wrote: > > We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find (looking at > > 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. > > Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( > > I must agree on you comments on PortMaster. Have you tested Nortel CVS? > We are running a mixed system of TNT's, MAX'es and Nortel CVS's and I > must say that we are quite happy with the Nortels. Well, I read some not-so-flattering things about the Nortel from several people (mostly reliability things and some problems working with RADIUS because they do their own thing with VSAs). Because of that (and the price of replacing all of our current equipment) we decided to stick with the TNTs. -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From eric at istal.com Fri Aug 17 05:55:24 2001 From: eric at istal.com (Eric Larsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) packet loss on 100MB ethernet port - MAXTNT References: <3.0.3.32.20010816105334.02c9f5e0@mail.rockriver.net> <20010816110250.H13019@HiWAAY.net> Message-ID: <000901c1270b$1f0f3b60$0e5210d0@istal.com> I have a slot card with a 100MB ethernet port and 3 unused10MB ports on my TNT. I am getting a high amount of packet loss on the 100MB port. I usually have 120 to 150 v.90 dial up customers on the TNT. How do I turn on logging to determine the cause of the packet loss. Also, if I want to load balance using the other 3 unused 10MB ports does anyone have any suggestions on how to set that up. Thanks Eric Larsen eric@istal.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Aug 17 09:06:48 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <20010816124808.I13019@HiWAAY.net> Message-ID: I've been using Max 4k and 6k boxes for about 5 years now. A year and a half ago, I started working with the Nortel CVX, and at the time it showed great promise, but was still a very immature product. From what I've heard, it's not changed much in the last year. 6 months ago, I finally got hands on with a TNT and now I own 2 of them. I don't like what Lucent has done with the product (support contracts, pay for firmware, etc). They're going to be scaring a lot of people away from a perfectly good platform. Now, for the PM3, what is it about them that people like so much? In a previous life, I inherited a few of them, and I must say that I didn't much care for them at all (then again, at the time, I was rather spoiled by the Max 6k). Hands down, the TNT is king, and I'll stick with it until I'm able to grow into an APX. By that time, Lucent's support costs probably won't seem so bad. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Chris Adams ** Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:48 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 ** rip-off ** ** ** Once upon a time, Anssi Sallinen said: ** > Chris Adams wrote: ** > > We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find ** (looking at ** > > 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. ** > > Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( ** > ** > I must agree on you comments on PortMaster. Have you tested Nortel CVS? ** > We are running a mixed system of TNT's, MAX'es and Nortel CVS's and I ** > must say that we are quite happy with the Nortels. ** ** Well, I read some not-so-flattering things about the Nortel from several ** people (mostly reliability things and some problems working with RADIUS ** because they do their own thing with VSAs). Because of that (and the ** price of replacing all of our current equipment) we decided to stick ** with the TNTs. ** -- ** Chris Adams ** Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services ** I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Fri Aug 17 09:33:49 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Ummm, what do you do with the TNT? We have 15-20 in production. I would never recommend them again. We purchased most of them as Ascend and they were great, mostly because if you found a bug you could call an engineer for free and they would have a fix shortly there after. Why, because a 'feature' you paid for was disfunctional. Now that Lucent is in charge.... well lets just say you can't even talk to a live person with out punching in a credit card #, and you have to do that just to walk through newbie troubleshooting to identify the problem. So, right now all they do is switched t1's and modems... and they can handle that usually. We have recently had 2 tnt's suddenly die of bit rot or something. When I emailed support and our sales rep, what I got was a pitch for the new TNT's that were on sale and included the v.92 modems..... Yeah, like I'm gonna by more of something thats broke with out an answer as to why! On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Troy Settle wrote: > > I've been using Max 4k and 6k boxes for about 5 years now. A year and a > half ago, I started working with the Nortel CVX, and at the time it showed > great promise, but was still a very immature product. From what I've heard, > it's not changed much in the last year. > > 6 months ago, I finally got hands on with a TNT and now I own 2 of them. I > don't like what Lucent has done with the product (support contracts, pay for > firmware, etc). They're going to be scaring a lot of people away from a > perfectly good platform. > > Now, for the PM3, what is it about them that people like so much? In a > previous life, I inherited a few of them, and I must say that I didn't much > care for them at all (then again, at the time, I was rather spoiled by the > Max 6k). > > Hands down, the TNT is king, and I'll stick with it until I'm able to grow > into an APX. By that time, Lucent's support costs probably won't seem so > bad. > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Chris Adams > ** Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:48 PM > ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 > ** rip-off > ** > ** > ** Once upon a time, Anssi Sallinen said: > ** > Chris Adams wrote: > ** > > We aren't real happy with the TNT, but from what we can find > ** (looking at > ** > > 3Com/Commworks, Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel), the TNT fits our needs best. > ** > > Where oh where is the true PortMaster replacement? :-( > ** > > ** > I must agree on you comments on PortMaster. Have you tested Nortel CVS? > ** > We are running a mixed system of TNT's, MAX'es and Nortel CVS's and I > ** > must say that we are quite happy with the Nortels. > ** > ** Well, I read some not-so-flattering things about the Nortel from several > ** people (mostly reliability things and some problems working with RADIUS > ** because they do their own thing with VSAs). Because of that (and the > ** price of replacing all of our current equipment) we decided to stick > ** with the TNTs. > ** -- > ** Chris Adams > ** Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > ** I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From martin.saunders at uk.easynet.net Fri Aug 17 09:31:27 2001 From: martin.saunders at uk.easynet.net (Martin Saunders) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) packet loss on 100MB ethernet port - MAXTNT Message-ID: <8C3A4EFFA0E7D411B3310008C7E6143B183919@weatherwax.office.easynet.net> > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Larsen [mailto:eric@istal.com] > Sent: 17 August 2001 11:55 > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) packet loss on 100MB ethernet port - MAXTNT > > > I have a slot card with a 100MB ethernet port and 3 > unused10MB ports on my > TNT. I am getting a high amount of packet loss on the 100MB > port. I usually > have 120 to 150 v.90 dial up customers on the TNT. How do I > turn on logging > to determine the cause of the packet loss. This might be an obvious statement, but in my experience, 9 times out of 10 packet loss on Ethernet is down to a duplex mismatch between the host and the switch. Make sure you have the setting for duplex in Ethernet {1 x y} (where x and y are you slot number and port number) set to full-duplex, and check the switch port the TNT is plugged in to is also nailed to full-duplex. Cheers Martin +----------------- Martin Saunders Products Manager Easynet Ltd. 'Best European ISP' by ISPA 2001 http://about.easynet.net martin.saunders@uk.easynet.net Tel:(+44) (0)20 7900 4444 -----------------+ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Aug 17 11:36:52 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) CPU Usage In-Reply-To: <200108170545.WAA24710@max.bungi.com> References: <200108170545.WAA24710@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "akeed hartala" > >do anyone have an idea about how to measure CPU usage for the MAX TNT ? Not possible, on anything running TAOS. BTW, the TNT has processors on each slot card, in addition to the shelf controller. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Fri Aug 17 11:51:08 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: References: <20010816124808.I13019@HiWAAY.net> Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010817115108.02e41ed4@mail.rockriver.net> At 10:06 AM 8/17/01 -0400, Troy wrote: >Hands down, the TNT is king, and I'll stick with it until I'm able to grow >into an APX. By that time, Lucent's support costs probably won't seem so >bad. > That is because you haven't checked on the support costs for an APX yet. :-0 $13,500 was only for the software license for the TNT and did not include support. That was extra and I didn't bother to check on the support price. You are not allowed to get or use software upgrades beyond what you buy without support. It looks like the Lucent plan is to try and force anyone who is interested into buying 'new' hardware which I suspect is gathering dust on warehouse shelves. TNTs are great for v.90 and below. I suspect that they are now close to EOL though. Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net Fri Aug 17 12:51:30 2001 From: jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: The death of Lucent/Ascend a.k.a. re: v.92 rip-off In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010817115108.02e41ed4@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, ISPstuff wrote: >That is because you haven't checked on the support costs for an APX yet. :-0 Or any "support" costs... >It looks like the Lucent plan is to try and force anyone who is interested >into buying 'new' hardware which I suspect is gathering dust on warehouse >shelves. They gotta make money somehow. Personally, I think all NAS hardware stinks. I'd rather use Netblazers if I could find any -- of course, they're just terminal servers without any modems. USR makes (or made) the best modems on the market. --Ricky ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at just4.com Fri Aug 17 14:03:48 2001 From: dave at just4.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Win2K Advanced Server Message-ID: Hi there. Got someone that's using Win2K Adv. Server dialing into a Max 4048. They're only able to ping the Max, but nothing beyond that, and I'm not able to ping into into his while dialed into the same Max, when I can ping into the other users on it. I've never seen this OS he's using and from what he describes to me it seems to be way different than anything else that's called Windows. Anyone here that's used this OS that may have any ideas what I could tell this guy to look at for settings to check? He seems pretty knowledgeable on this system and with networking overall and says he can't see anything that seems to be out of place. He's set up a new dialup connection which defaulted to MP rather than PPP, but got that switched back. He says the same system has been in use for months with no trouble. Or perhaps something I should check for on this Max? So far we've had no problems with any Win95 thru ME or Mac customers. Actually I want to turn back to his settings since the same thing appears to happen when he dials into a backup non-Ascend unit as well. TIA Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdugas at arenet.net Fri Aug 17 14:31:45 2001 From: mdugas at arenet.net (Michael Dugas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend SuperPipe 155 Stuff References: Message-ID: <000701c12753$401a2a70$1121fb40@ADCMSD2LAPTOP> Hi All! I apologize for my inexperience with the Ascend, but I'm having some problems with a SuperPipe 155... 1st - Any way to reset the unit back to the default config? I'm having problems trying to figure it out. We're trying some weird config stuff and I'm afraid I goobered things up a bit. 2nd - How do you 'delete' or 'copy' connections through the telnet session? I've tried just about every key combo I can think of, and I'll I can do is drill-down into the config for that connection (or go back up to the top level menu....) Thanks a bunch. Later! Mike - Michael Dugas - mdugas@arenet.net - Aretech Information Services ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From RBooth at birch.com Sat Aug 18 00:02:29 2001 From: RBooth at birch.com (Booth, Randy) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] wanting multiple static routes pointed to a single ISDN customer Message-ID: <4B2B38D03D23D41191C7009027DCC8E2044F898A@kcdcex02.birch.com> Hello all... I am trying to figure out if there is a way to configure multiple static routes to a single customer in the TNT. They are currently up and cooking using one of the subnets, but I tried to manually add the second route to the TNT and it doesn't appear to work. Any ideas? Thanks, Randy From plalor at infoasis.com Sat Aug 18 15:30:47 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend SuperPipe 155 Stuff In-Reply-To: <200108180545.WAA00358@max.bungi.com> References: <200108180545.WAA00358@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: > I apologize for my inexperience with the Ascend, but I'm having some >problems with a SuperPipe 155... > > 1st - Any way to reset the unit back to the default config? I'm having >problems trying to figure it out. We're trying some weird config stuff and >I'm afraid I goobered things up a bit. In Diagnostics (Ctrl-D, D), do fclear then nvramclear. > 2nd - How do you 'delete' or 'copy' connections through the telnet >session? I've tried just about every key combo I can think of, and I'll I >can do is drill-down into the config for that connection (or go back up to >the top level menu....) While pointing at or within a connection profile you want to copy, do Ctrl-D, Save. Then point at the slot you want the copy saved in. A copy is saved, but you are still within the original, so move over to the copy if you want to edit it. You can make changes to an original, save the edited version to another slot, and exit without saving changes, thereby not affecting the original. It's pretty nice, actually. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From richard at 808hi.com Sun Aug 19 15:49:01 2001 From: richard at 808hi.com (Richard Gamberg) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) V.92 ISPs? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I've put up a new page to list ISPs that support V.92; If you're offering V.92, let the world know by filling in the form to add your biz to the list: www.modemsite.com/56k/v92isp.htm Aloha, Richard Gamberg, Publisher (Formerly 56k=v.Unreliable) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Sun Aug 19 17:18:15 2001 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] To upgrade or not to upgrade... Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010820101815.008e4ba0@mail.igrin.co.nz> Hi, We have a MAX6000 which has been running the ebixk.m60 version of TAOS 7.2.0 for some time. (Probably about a year, although I'm not sure as I havn't been looking after it for that long) The question is, are there any known problems with this version with certain customer modem types that has been improved in later versions ? From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Sun Aug 19 17:10:12 2001 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (netlink@netlinkcorp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) V.92 ISPs? References: Message-ID: <3B803944.3104@netlinkcorp.com> Maybe you can provide the list with how long you have been running V.92 to support the other statement you made "(Formerly 56k=v.Unreliable)" or are you just promoting V.92? Everything I have seen related to V.92 on these lists including this one says V.92 is the ".unreliable" Obviously 56k (V.90) is not great but it is much better than V.34 and haven't seen anyone so pleased with V.92 to brag about it to spend the $ to make the upgrade change. Hopefully you can give us your feedback. Thanks. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Richard Gamberg wrote: > > I've put up a new page to list ISPs that support V.92; > > If you're offering V.92, let the world know by filling in the form to add > your biz to the list: > > www.modemsite.com/56k/v92isp.htm > > Aloha, > Richard Gamberg, Publisher > (Formerly 56k=v.Unreliable) > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From stimpy at freedomdrivingaids.com Tue Aug 21 15:18:48 2001 From: stimpy at freedomdrivingaids.com (Peter Howey) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? Message-ID: <000701c12a7e$7c662780$160aa8c0@freedomain.com> I have a peculiar problem and was wondering if anyone had had a similar prob or heard of something like this.. I set up a Ascend MAX 6000 for my old employer on a PRI for internal WAN/RAS services and didn't have a problem with it until one of our larger customers turned up with a $50,000 LD phone bill from AT&T. The customer was dialing from outside our MacLeod virtual PoP and my boss had calculated cost estimates for them based on LD-RATEx24x7x2[b channels]. The customer accepted this estimate. The bills from AT&T look something like this: #=continuation of long duration call #APR 9 914AM 2371.8 [min] 529.19 [cost] APR 9 914AM 2325.0 524.87 #APR 4 653AM 1994.5 414.61 #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 320.58 #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 293.76 APR 4 653AM 2466.2 556.74 APR 4 159AM 293.5 59.87 APR 3 1105PM 173.5 35.39 APR 3 600PM 304.0 65.91 That's for the first line, the second B looks the same [with the same costs]. The bills are filled with techically impossible connections - the only explanation is that they were being billed for connections that were not properly terminated by either the client or host. FCC Tarif 4 states that if the terminating customer's premises disconnects but the originating customer's premises does not, chargeable time ends when the connection is released by automatic timing equipment in the telecommunications network. My old employer stated in a certified letter that he had a 3Com technician go through the config that I had done on the client's OfficeConnect ISDN modems and found that they were correct. I'm wondering if a config problem on the MAX end would have caused this? I have also heard that he also had a similar problem with another customer after I left his employ, and I know that that customer was using MacLeod's virtual PoP to him, so I am ruling out a LD-related possibility. For the record, I'm now working for the comany with the $50,000 phone bill, which puts me in a very awkward position. Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated. Peter M. Howey, MFA MIS, Freedom Group, LLC 901 Salzburg Ave. Bay City, MI 48706 989-895-9733 989-895-9722 FAX The sooner all of the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find where they've been hiding their money. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dfl at chudys.com Tue Aug 21 09:07:53 2001 From: dfl at chudys.com (Darkshot's Lists) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? Message-ID: <174603794821.20010821100753@chudys.com> Is there a way on the Max 4K/6K or in Radius somehow to simply refuse to connect a call that has their caller ID blocked? Any help/info appreciated- Thanks! 'Shot ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Tue Aug 21 16:51:01 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? References: <174603794821.20010821100753@chudys.com> Message-ID: <3B82D7C5.8228C018@lucentradius.com> Darkshot's Lists wrote: > > Is there a way on the Max 4K/6K or in Radius somehow to > simply refuse to connect a call that has their caller ID > blocked? Any help/info appreciated- NavisRadius supports block lists where you can pick any RADIUS attribute you want to check against a list of values to reject if present. -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Aug 21 19:06:35 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? Message-ID: This is easy to do with pre-authentication on the MAX. If the call comes in with a CLID which is not recognized (no clid would be one of those), you drop the call before it even answers. This is detailed in the TAOS Radius reference guide, Max Security Supplement and the MAX Network Configuration Guide. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Darkshot's Lists [mailto:dfl@chudys.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:08 AM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? > > > Is there a way on the Max 4K/6K or in Radius somehow to > simply refuse to connect a call that has their caller ID > blocked? Any help/info appreciated- > > Thanks! > 'Shot > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dfl at chudys.com Tue Aug 21 20:59:06 2001 From: dfl at chudys.com (Darkshot's Lists) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re[2]: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <196284550198.20010821215906@chudys.com> DGG> If the call comes in with a CLID which is not recognized DGG> (no clid would be one of those), you drop the call before it DGG> even answers. I had no idea that was in the RUBB- sorry. Since it's at the office and I'm at home, just for grins, am I going to have to put in all legit CLID numbers or will a wildcard suffice? I need it to just refuse calls that have caller ID blocked- everything else is fine. Thanks for your help! 'Shot ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lo.ad at codetel.net.do Wed Aug 22 09:30:23 2001 From: lo.ad at codetel.net.do (Jordell Anderson) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max 4060 upgrade Message-ID: <000001c12b17$0462a3a0$cf22f4cd@hppav> Hi All, I have a Max 4060 running version 6.04 with load febk.m40. I would like to upgrade to a newer version. Which version in the 7?s > is the most stable? I appreciate any advice and or experience. J Anderson Lo.ad@codetel.net.do -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010822/50bc711d/attachment.htm From borothene at hotmail.com Wed Aug 22 10:28:32 2001 From: borothene at hotmail.com (Rich) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) This progam will dramatically speed up your computer Message-ID: <200108221429.HAA24473@max.bungi.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010822/21c308ba/attachment.html From rishi.sumbal at fr.easynet.net Wed Aug 22 11:47:42 2001 From: rishi.sumbal at fr.easynet.net (Rishi SUMBAL) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) v110 problems Message-ID: <09a001c12b2a$299c1440$1802b4d4@easynet.fr> Hello all I'm interested with someone who runs V110 on TNT. We do here but with no real success, many V110 calls are dropped and Lucent says it comes from our WAP Gateway. Rishi Sumbal Easynet France ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Aug 23 02:17:29 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? Message-ID: It all depends on what your radius server can do. It would have to respond Authcode 2 (access-accept) for all other preauth attempts (this may be possible with a wildcard or may not). Also, you would check Ascend-Require-Auth, if you also need to do PPP authentication. There are also some parameters in the Answer Profile which are relevant. the following is taken from an old MAX reference guide ------------MAX Reference guide------------------- Id Auth Description: Specifies how CLID (calling line ID) or DNIS (Dial Number Information Service) should be used for authentication. Usage: Specify one of the following values: * Ignore (the default) Don't require a matching ID from incoming calls. * Prefer Authenticate using the CLID if available, otherwise fall back to using PAP or CHAP authentication. * Require The CLID must be valid and match the value in a configured profile. If the profile also requires password authentication, do that as well. * Fallback Authenticate using the CLID when RADIUS is available, otherwise fall back to using password authentication. * Called Require The called number must be valid and match the Calling # value in a configured profile. If the profile also requires password authentication, do that as well. * Called Prefer Authenticate using the Calling # value in a configured profile if available, otherwise fall back to using password authentication. Location: Ethernet > Answer See Also: AnsOrig, Calling #, Called # ------------------------------------------------------------------- Good luck. All this is relatively standard for a MAX (if your Telco provides CLID). Your reseller or Lucent support representative may be able to help you, if you run into problems. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Darkshot's Lists [mailto:dfl@chudys.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:59 AM > To: Daley, Greg (Greg) > Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? > > > > > DGG> If the call comes in with a CLID which is not recognized > DGG> (no clid would be one of those), you drop the > call before it > DGG> even answers. > > I had no idea that was in the RUBB- sorry. Since it's at the office > and I'm at home, just for grins, am I going to have to put in all > legit CLID numbers or will a wildcard suffice? I need it to just > refuse calls that have caller ID blocked- everything else is fine. > > > Thanks for your help! > > 'Shot > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Aug 23 05:35:10 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? In-Reply-To: <000701c12a7e$7c662780$160aa8c0@freedomain.com> Message-ID: I'm not quite sure I understand why anyone would sell or buy a dedicated ISDN connection that was going to be long distance, or is AT&T your local carrier? 2*60*24*30 is 86400 minutes. Assuming .07/minute for LD, that's over $6k/month. A full T1 would be much, much cheaper. IMO, whomever sold the service and worked up the quote was smoking crack. For the $50k phone bill, I'd say that AT&T has a problem with their billing system. Surely if you talk to them, you'll be able to convince them that the bill is impossible. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Peter Howey ** Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:19 PM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? ** ** ** I have a peculiar problem and was wondering if anyone had had a ** similar prob ** or heard of something like this.. ** ** I set up a Ascend MAX 6000 for my old employer on a PRI for ** internal WAN/RAS ** services and didn't ** have a problem with it until one of our larger customers turned up with a ** $50,000 LD phone bill from ** AT&T. ** ** The customer was dialing from outside our MacLeod virtual PoP and my boss ** had calculated cost ** estimates for them based on LD-RATEx24x7x2[b channels]. The customer ** accepted ** this estimate. ** ** The bills from AT&T look something like this: ** ** #=continuation of long duration call ** ** #APR 9 914AM 2371.8 [min] 529.19 [cost] ** APR 9 914AM 2325.0 524.87 ** #APR 4 653AM 1994.5 414.61 ** #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 320.58 ** #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 293.76 ** APR 4 653AM 2466.2 556.74 ** APR 4 159AM 293.5 59.87 ** APR 3 1105PM 173.5 35.39 ** APR 3 600PM 304.0 65.91 ** ** That's for the first line, the second B looks the same [with the same ** costs]. The bills are filled with techically ** impossible connections - the only explanation is that they were ** being billed ** for connections that were not properly ** terminated by either the client or host. ** ** FCC Tarif 4 states that if the terminating customer's premises ** disconnects ** but the originating customer's premises ** does not, chargeable time ends when the connection is released ** by automatic ** timing equipment in the telecommunications ** network. ** ** My old employer stated in a certified letter that he had a 3Com ** technician ** go through the config that I had done ** on the client's OfficeConnect ISDN modems and found that they ** were correct. ** I'm wondering if a config problem ** on the MAX end would have caused this? ** ** I have also heard that he also had a similar problem with ** another customer ** after I left his employ, and I know ** that that customer was using MacLeod's virtual PoP to him, so I am ruling ** out a LD-related possibility. ** ** For the record, I'm now working for the comany with the $50,000 ** phone bill, ** which puts me in a very awkward position. ** ** Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated. ** ** Peter M. Howey, MFA ** MIS, Freedom Group, LLC ** 901 Salzburg Ave. ** Bay City, MI 48706 ** 989-895-9733 ** 989-895-9722 FAX ** ** The sooner all of the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find where ** they've been hiding their money. ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dfl at chudys.com Thu Aug 23 08:54:15 2001 From: dfl at chudys.com (Darkshot's Lists) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re[4]: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20413879167.20010823095415@chudys.com> DGG> Good luck. DGG> All this is relatively standard for a MAX (if your DGG> Telco provides CLID). Your reseller or Lucent DGG> support representative may be able to help you, DGG> if you run into problems. DGG> Greg >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darkshot's Lists [mailto:dfl@chudys.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:59 AM >> To: Daley, Greg (Greg) >> Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com >> Subject: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? DGG> It all depends on what your radius server can do. Dandy. In my opinion, a RAS box that doesn't have a "ignore blocked CLID" function is a product of engineering idiocy- and something I would have never let slide when _I_ consulted for BL. On top of that, I don't think my Dad would have let it slide ca.1967.....when HE worked for BL. This lack of functionality is BS- plain and simple. Who's gonna send the press release: /flame on Spammers and Script Kiddies Unite! We can't tell who you are! We'd really LIKE to know who you are, but we were just too busy fucking up V.92! Send us your email address and we'll send you a Netscape Beanie Baby!!!! /flame off WTF are the Ascend guys smoking, anyway- and where can we get some? 'Shot PS I know the RUBB like the back of my hand, so don't rain on me. If it's in there, it's in invisible ink. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rcunning at xnet.com Thu Aug 23 09:53:20 2001 From: rcunning at xnet.com (Rob Cunningham) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Isdn Bonding on MAX TNT? Message-ID: <004701c12be3$59bfff10$9de0010a@hal9000> Here is my situation, I hope someone can help :) We are using an Ascend MAX TNT running software version 8.0.1 I have a client who is using a Windows 2000 machine with two US Robotics, USB Isdn adapters. He is trying to get both of them to connect to our system so he can effectively have 4b channels connected (256k). He is able to get two channels up no problem, and it appears as though his machine is setup correctly. Once one of his isdn adapters tries to bring up a 3rd B channel, it just fails, and our log gives a code of 185, 63. I looked up the disconnect and progress codes, but they didn't offer me anything interesting. Here is what his account looks like in our radius file. I thought the "Asscend-Maximum-Channels = 4" would make this work, but evidently not. If anyone can provide some feedback to whether or not there is a way to do this, I would greatly appreciate it. username Password = "password" Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 4, Framed-Route = "205.243.145.216/29 0.0.0.0 1", Framed-IP-Address = 205.243.145.218, Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.248, Fall-Through = 1 Regards, Rob Cunningham rcunning@xnet.com XNet - www.xnet.com (630) 983 - 6064 From plalor at infoasis.com Thu Aug 23 13:31:07 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) OT: Copper Mountain/Ascend DSLAMs Message-ID: If anyone has experience with Copper Mountain DSLAMs, especially the OnPrem 2400, and ideally also with Ascend DSL Max 20s, I'd like to pick your brain. Please contact me off-list. TIA. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From stimpy at freedomdrivingaids.com Thu Aug 23 09:26:04 2001 From: stimpy at freedomdrivingaids.com (Peter Howey) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? References: Message-ID: <00dc01c12bdf$8af26f90$160aa8c0@freedomain.com> It seems like my employer was smoking *something*. He figured a worse-case scenario would be that the ISDN router would only be connected during business hours - for two B's @ 0.07 would be like $750.00. The customer trusted him and said OK... But my employer never set netbios filtering on the ISDN router or account login limits on the RAS..so the thing was essentially nailed up. The other problem still exists, also...where either the Ascend MAX or the 3Com modem wasn't disconnecting and incurring multiple charges that don't seem possible. And that's the part I'm having a problem with. There is NO problem with AT&T's bill...one end wasn't being dropped, and according to FCC TARIFF 4: "...chargeable time ends when the originating customer's premises disconnects. If the terminating customer's premises disconnects but the originating customer's premises does not, chargeable time ends when the connection is released by automatic timing equipment in the telecommunications network". Any insight appreciated.... Cheers, Peter M. Howey, MFA MIS, Freedom Group, LLC 901 Salzburg Ave. Bay City, MI 48706 989-895-9733 989-895-9722 FAX The sooner all of the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find where they've been hiding their money. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Troy Settle" To: "Peter Howey" ; Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:35 AM Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? > > I'm not quite sure I understand why anyone would sell or buy a dedicated > ISDN connection that was going to be long distance, or is AT&T your local > carrier? > > 2*60*24*30 is 86400 minutes. Assuming .07/minute for LD, that's over > $6k/month. A full T1 would be much, much cheaper. IMO, whomever sold the > service and worked up the quote was smoking crack. > > For the $50k phone bill, I'd say that AT&T has a problem with their billing > system. Surely if you talk to them, you'll be able to convince them that > the bill is impossible. > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Peter Howey > ** Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:19 PM > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend MAX & 3Com OfficeConnect ISDN? > ** > ** > ** I have a peculiar problem and was wondering if anyone had had a > ** similar prob > ** or heard of something like this.. > ** > ** I set up a Ascend MAX 6000 for my old employer on a PRI for > ** internal WAN/RAS > ** services and didn't > ** have a problem with it until one of our larger customers turned up with a > ** $50,000 LD phone bill from > ** AT&T. > ** > ** The customer was dialing from outside our MacLeod virtual PoP and my boss > ** had calculated cost > ** estimates for them based on LD-RATEx24x7x2[b channels]. The customer > ** accepted > ** this estimate. > ** > ** The bills from AT&T look something like this: > ** > ** #=continuation of long duration call > ** > ** #APR 9 914AM 2371.8 [min] 529.19 [cost] > ** APR 9 914AM 2325.0 524.87 > ** #APR 4 653AM 1994.5 414.61 > ** #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 320.58 > ** #APR 4 653AM 1440.0 293.76 > ** APR 4 653AM 2466.2 556.74 > ** APR 4 159AM 293.5 59.87 > ** APR 3 1105PM 173.5 35.39 > ** APR 3 600PM 304.0 65.91 > ** > ** That's for the first line, the second B looks the same [with the same > ** costs]. The bills are filled with techically > ** impossible connections - the only explanation is that they were > ** being billed > ** for connections that were not properly > ** terminated by either the client or host. > ** > ** FCC Tarif 4 states that if the terminating customer's premises > ** disconnects > ** but the originating customer's premises > ** does not, chargeable time ends when the connection is released > ** by automatic > ** timing equipment in the telecommunications > ** network. > ** > ** My old employer stated in a certified letter that he had a 3Com > ** technician > ** go through the config that I had done > ** on the client's OfficeConnect ISDN modems and found that they > ** were correct. > ** I'm wondering if a config problem > ** on the MAX end would have caused this? > ** > ** I have also heard that he also had a similar problem with > ** another customer > ** after I left his employ, and I know > ** that that customer was using MacLeod's virtual PoP to him, so I am ruling > ** out a LD-related possibility. > ** > ** For the record, I'm now working for the comany with the $50,000 > ** phone bill, > ** which puts me in a very awkward position. > ** > ** Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated. > ** > ** Peter M. Howey, MFA > ** MIS, Freedom Group, LLC > ** 901 Salzburg Ave. > ** Bay City, MI 48706 > ** 989-895-9733 > ** 989-895-9722 FAX > ** > ** The sooner all of the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find where > ** they've been hiding their money. > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mwiza at malawi.net Mon Aug 27 09:28:28 2001 From: mwiza at malawi.net (Mwiza Nyirenda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Load on MAX TNT Message-ID: <001401c12f04$8af7e100$02a994d0@two.malawi.net> Is there a way of monitoring usage on a Max TNT? Regards Mwiza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010827/e0d4496c/attachment.htm From wildcat at pcez.com Mon Aug 27 14:02:48 2001 From: wildcat at pcez.com (Ken Rea) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 In-Reply-To: <200108250545.WAA08496@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: We just got a bare Max 4002 to replace a box that went south. We put in 3 56k by 16 modem cards and loaded version 7.0.26 software in the box. We did a fclear and nvramclear and put in our same setup we use in the 4048's that we use. The only real difference I can tell on this box is it has the fire wall option and has no frame relay option. Anyway, we use channelized T1's and we set that up. We set up a default gateway to our Linux router under the default static route. We do not use any of the connection profiles but use the answer profile as our default. Under the mod config->ethernet we set up IP address, Rip send v1 (as we do on all our 4048's), Ignore def rt = yes, proxy mode = active, filter = 0. The 4002 will ping to the outside world (as well as our net) just fine. When a client calls into the modem, they can ping the box but the cannot get any further that the max 4002 box. I looked at out gated router and in the logs it looks like the router doesn't want any rip info from this machine. The message in the log looks like: "Aug 27 09:30:09 rip_recv: ignoring RIP Request packet from 209.102.125.10+520 - not supplying RIP" The 209.102.125.10 is the ethernet IP address for this MAX 4002. Is there some place where the RIP request have passwords added to them? I know RIP can have passwords but I have never seen this on my 4048's or 6096. Has anyone run into this problem before? Can anyone point me in the correct direction? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Ken Rea wildcat@pcez.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From swiseman at remax-cahi.com Mon Aug 27 15:25:27 2001 From: swiseman at remax-cahi.com (Scott.Wiseman) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) test Message-ID: <5DEF109335DAD111B05F00A0C9DDFC02A4312B@ROCHS2> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lists-mail-isp-ascend-users at pgregg.com Tue Aug 28 06:47:34 2001 From: lists-mail-isp-ascend-users at pgregg.com (Paul Gregg) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010828114734.26960.qmail@pgunix.fw.tibus.net> No, I don't believe it is possible - nor is it what he asked for in the first place. The capabilities of the RADIUS server, although important, have nothing to do with the NAS. He wants to block specific numbers at pre-auth stage. (As do I) I also want to accept calls both with and without CLID presented. I *always* want to authenticate with username and password. You can pre-auth the CLID - however, the NAS just gets back an Accept or a Deny. If it gets a Deny, then the unit drops the call. If it gets an Accept then the call is accepted *but* no further username/password is required - not good. CLID-First - if CLID is available - the call is both accepted and authenticated on any available CLID. If the RADIUS reponds with a DENY, then the user can login with username & password. Thus not ideal for us. CLID-Prefer - This should be the one we want if we have the RADIUS send back a Ascend-Require-Auth = Require-Auth as the DEFAULT response then the APX should accept the call, then do username/pw auth - except it doesn't, it simply acts as CLID first. CLID-Require and CLID-Fallback both require CLID and so are not suitable. Now, fortunately I'm using Radiator RADIUS and so can modify my PostAuthHook to turn an Accept into a Deny for denied CLIDs. "Surely, the abuser can withhold their clid and still connect then"? You might say, yes they can and we don't have a problem with that since all CLID withheld dialins have a *very* restrictive filter placed on the dialup so they can't do anything except browse the web through our caches and pick up email (sending denied). I'm on an APX ver 9.0.2. Paul Gregg In article you wrote: > > > This is easy to do with pre-authentication on the MAX. > > If the call comes in with a CLID which is not recognized > (no clid would be one of those), you drop the call before it > even answers. > > This is detailed in the TAOS Radius reference guide, > Max Security Supplement and the MAX Network > Configuration Guide. > > Greg > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darkshot's Lists [mailto:dfl@chudys.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:08 AM >> To: ascend-users@bungi.com >> Subject: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? >> >> >> Is there a way on the Max 4K/6K or in Radius somehow to >> simply refuse to connect a call that has their caller ID >> blocked? Any help/info appreciated- >> >> Thanks! >> 'Shot >> >> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to >> ascend-users-request@bungi.com >> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ >> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > -- -- | Paul Gregg |T: +44 (0) 28 90424190 | Technical Director |F: +44 (0) 28 90424709 | The Internet Business Ltd |W: http://www.tibus.com | Holywood House, Innis Court |E: info@tibus.com | Holywood, Co Down, BT18 9HF |P: pgregg@tibus.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From wildcat at pcez.com Tue Aug 28 11:16:16 2001 From: wildcat at pcez.com (Ken Rea) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 (Try Again!) Message-ID: We just got a bare Max 4002 to replace a box that went south. We put in 3 56k by 16 modem cards and loaded version 7.0.26 software in the box. We did a fclear and nvramclear and put in our same setup we use in the 4048's that we use. The only real difference I can tell on this box is it has the fire wall option and has no frame relay option. Anyway, we use channelized T1's and we set that up. We set up a default gateway to our Linux router under the default static route. We do not use any of the connection profiles but use the answer profile as our default. Under the mod config->ethernet we set up IP address, Rip send v1 (as we do on all our 4048's), Ignore def rt = yes, proxy mode = active, filter = 0. The 4002 will ping to the outside world (as well as our net) just fine. When a client calls into the modem, they can ping the box but the cannot get any further that the max 4002 box. I looked at out gated router and in the logs it looks like the router doesn't want any rip info from this machine. The message in the log looks like: "Aug 27 09:30:09 rip_recv: ignoring RIP Request packet from 209.102.125.10+520 - not supplying RIP" The 209.102.125.10 is the ethernet IP address for this MAX 4002. Is there some place where the RIP request have passwords added to them? I know RIP can have passwords but I have never seen this on my 4048's or 6096. Has anyone run into this problem before? Can anyone point me in the correct direction? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Ken Rea wildcat@pcez.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From maillist1 at argontech.net Tue Aug 28 12:17:18 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 (Try Again!) References: Message-ID: <001901c12fe5$55008c00$3301fe8a@argontech.net> This will often come to be a IP routing issue. If the Class C addresses that your MAX is handing out to your dial in customers is not in the same class-C that the ethernet port and your internal network to the core router, you will see exactly what you're seeing. If this is the case, all you have to do is build a route into your gateway that tells it all addresses meant for class C XXX.XXX.XXX.0 go to ethernet port XXX.XXX.XXX.X hope that's clear enough. In the cisco router we would use: ip route 207.XXX.XXX.64 255.255.255.244 208.xxx.xxx.28 this tells the router that any packets meant for 207.XXX.XXX.64 with a subnet of 255.255.255.244 should go to ethernet address 208.xxx.xxx.28 marco <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Rea" To: "Ascend Users Mail List" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:16 AM Subject: (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 (Try Again!) > > > We just got a bare Max 4002 to replace a box that went south. We put in 3 > 56k by 16 modem cards and loaded version 7.0.26 software in the box. We > did a fclear and nvramclear and put in our same setup we use in the 4048's > that we use. The only real difference I can tell on this box is it has the > fire wall option and has no frame relay option. > > Anyway, we use channelized T1's and we set that up. We set up a default > gateway to our Linux router under the default static route. We do not use > any of the connection profiles but use the answer profile as our default. > > Under the mod config->ethernet we set up IP address, Rip send v1 (as we do > on all our 4048's), Ignore def rt = yes, proxy mode = active, filter = 0. > > The 4002 will ping to the outside world (as well as our net) just fine. > When a client calls into the modem, they can ping the box but the cannot > get any further that the max 4002 box. > > I looked at out gated router and in the logs it looks like the router > doesn't want any rip info from this machine. The message in the log looks > like: > "Aug 27 09:30:09 rip_recv: ignoring RIP Request packet from > 209.102.125.10+520 - not supplying RIP" > > The 209.102.125.10 is the ethernet IP address for this MAX 4002. > > Is there some place where the RIP request have passwords added to them? I > know RIP can have passwords but I have never seen this on my 4048's or > 6096. > > Has anyone run into this problem before? Can anyone point me in the > correct direction? Any help will be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Ken Rea > wildcat@pcez.com > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Tue Aug 28 11:43:29 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? References: <20010828114734.26960.qmail@pgunix.fw.tibus.net> Message-ID: <3B8BCA31.3E5667C1@lucentradius.com> > You can pre-auth the CLID - however, the NAS just gets back an Accept or > a Deny. If it gets a Deny, then the unit drops the call. If it gets an > Accept then the call is accepted *but* no further username/password is > required - not good. That only happens if you tell the NAS to do that. Just because you accept the Pre-Auth does not mean that the call is automatically accepted. See the Ascend-Required-Auth RADIUS attribute for more information. -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ascenduser at yahoo.com Tue Aug 28 15:24:37 2001 From: ascenduser at yahoo.com (Jack Farad) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Callback and Analog modems ! Message-ID: <20010828202437.77632.qmail@web20310.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, Is it possible to configure a MAX TNT with analog modems to dialback(callback). This is working with Cisco and Shiva, but what about MAX TNT. If the modems are digital, I know that callback is supported and also CLID (the first version for ISDN callback is 7.2.4). thanks a lot, Jack __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pault at timmins.net Tue Aug 28 16:30:56 2001 From: pault at timmins.net (Paul Timmins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) P75 dial problems, etc... Message-ID: Is there any way I can get my Ascend P75 to bo back to 128k after I hang up from a voice call on one of the POTS lines? For some reason it doesn't (I have to disconnect and redial, breaking all my connections because I have dedicated service with a dynamic IP at the moment). Also my P75 unit recieves CLID but is there any way to get it to pass it to my telephone on the POTS port as well? (I use it for telecommuting and general internet access at my apartment) If not does it generate a SNMP trap that contains it so I can create a pop up on screen caller id program? Thanks in advance, -Paul Paul Timmins paul@timmins.net http://www.timmins.net/ Home: 248-858-7526 Pager: 248-333-9113 "By definition, if you don't stand up for anything, you stand for nothing." ---Paul Timmins ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Peter.DeSchrijver at netcom-kassel.de Mon Aug 27 03:46:12 2001 From: Peter.DeSchrijver at netcom-kassel.de (Peter.DeSchrijver@netcom-kassel.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 Message-ID: <9BB322CA0F24D011A1BB00C095ED473401FC5CFF@PRIMARY> Hi all ! I am currently using ascendd 1.16 and I?d like to give my users new usernames. For administrative reasons the emailadress seems a good Idea. Is 1.16 (980618!) the most current/safest ascendd ? TIA Peter De Schrijver ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Aug 28 17:35:27 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? Message-ID: Hi Paul, I thought the request was to block those without caller-ID/CLID In which case, Ethernet>Answer>Id Auth=CLID Require would do what you want since it will immediately drop all calls which do not present CLID, and refer to the RADIUS server for the rest. Darkshot was also asking particularly about Wildcard matching which is exclusively in the domain of the RADIUS server. Most RADIUS servers have a DEFAULT user mechanism, which could be set to (the equivalent of): DEFAULT Password="Ascend-CLID", Service-Type=Outbound Ascend-Require-Auth=Require-Auth All users with CLID are accepted, and all without are dropped. even if you cannot (or don't want to) do wildcards, you can selectively put in the peoples' clids. 84139139 Password="Ascend-CLID", Service-Type=Outbound # Greg's CLID Ascend-Require-Auth=Require-Auth This is in the manuals. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Gregg [mailto:lists-mail-isp-ascend-users@pgregg.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:48 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? > > > No, I don't believe it is possible - nor is it what he asked > for in the > first place. The capabilities of the RADIUS server, although > important, > have nothing to do with the NAS. > > He wants to block specific numbers at pre-auth stage. (As do I) > I also want to accept calls both with and without CLID presented. > I *always* want to authenticate with username and password. > > > You can pre-auth the CLID - however, the NAS just gets back > an Accept or > a Deny. If it gets a Deny, then the unit drops the call. If > it gets an > Accept then the call is accepted *but* no further username/password is > required - not good. > > CLID-First - if CLID is available - the call is both accepted and > authenticated on any available CLID. > If the RADIUS reponds with a DENY, then the user can login with > username & password. Thus not ideal for us. > > CLID-Prefer - This should be the one we want if we have the > RADIUS send back > a Ascend-Require-Auth = Require-Auth as the DEFAULT > response then > the APX should accept the call, then do username/pw > auth - except > it doesn't, it simply acts as CLID first. > > CLID-Require and CLID-Fallback both require CLID and so are > not suitable. > > > Now, fortunately I'm using Radiator RADIUS and so can modify > my PostAuthHook > to turn an Accept into a Deny for denied CLIDs. > > "Surely, the abuser can withhold their clid and still connect > then"? You > might say, yes they can and we don't have a problem with that > since all > CLID withheld dialins have a *very* restrictive filter placed > on the dialup > so they can't do anything except browse the web through our > caches and pick > up email (sending denied). > > I'm on an APX ver 9.0.2. > > Paul Gregg > > > In article > you wrote: > > > > > > This is easy to do with pre-authentication on the MAX. > > > > If the call comes in with a CLID which is not recognized > > (no clid would be one of those), you drop the call before it > > even answers. > > > > This is detailed in the TAOS Radius reference guide, > > Max Security Supplement and the MAX Network > > Configuration Guide. > > > > Greg > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Darkshot's Lists [mailto:dfl@chudys.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:08 AM > >> To: ascend-users@bungi.com > >> Subject: (ASCEND) Way to block no caller ID? > >> > >> > >> Is there a way on the Max 4K/6K or in Radius somehow to > >> simply refuse to connect a call that has their caller ID > >> blocked? Any help/info appreciated- > >> > >> Thanks! > >> 'Shot > >> > >> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > >> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > >> ascend-users-request@bungi.com > >> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > >> > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > -- > -- > | Paul Gregg |T: +44 (0) 28 90424190 > | Technical Director |F: +44 (0) 28 90424709 > | The Internet Business Ltd |W: http://www.tibus.com > | Holywood House, Innis Court |E: info@tibus.com > | Holywood, Co Down, BT18 9HF |P: pgregg@tibus.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Tue Aug 28 20:49:28 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 References: <9BB322CA0F24D011A1BB00C095ED473401FC5CFF@PRIMARY> Message-ID: <3B8C4A28.F8F67BCB@lucentradius.com> Peter.DeSchrijver@netcom-kassel.de wrote: > > Hi all ! > > I am currently using ascendd 1.16 and I?d like to give my users new > usernames. > For administrative reasons the emailadress seems a good Idea. > > Is 1.16 (980618!) the most current/safest ascendd ? > No, That server is no longer maintained or supported and there are known issues with it. The current supported RADIUS server from Lucent is NavisRadius 4.0 at http://www.lucentradius.com/ for evaluation. If you are looking for a free server I would suggest Cistron RADIUS. Tom -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From wildcat at pcez.com Tue Aug 28 22:09:41 2001 From: wildcat at pcez.com (Ken Rea) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 (Try Again!) In-Reply-To: <001901c12fe5$55008c00$3301fe8a@argontech.net> Message-ID: Marco, It is the same Class C addresses that the ethernet is set at. Thanks, Ken Rea On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Marco C. Coelho wrote: > This will often come to be a IP routing issue. If the Class C addresses > that your MAX is handing out to your dial in customers is not in the same > class-C that the ethernet port and your internal network to the core router, > you will see exactly what you're seeing. > > If this is the case, all you have to do is build a route into your gateway > that tells it all addresses meant for class C XXX.XXX.XXX.0 go to ethernet > port XXX.XXX.XXX.X > > hope that's clear enough. > > In the cisco router we would use: > > ip route 207.XXX.XXX.64 255.255.255.244 208.xxx.xxx.28 > > this tells the router that any packets meant for 207.XXX.XXX.64 with a > subnet of 255.255.255.244 should go to ethernet address 208.xxx.xxx.28 > > > marco > > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> > Marco C. Coelho > Argon Technologies > Texas' Best Internet Provider > 6701 Interstate 30 West > Greenville, Texas, 75402 > 903-455-5036 > http://www.argontech.net > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Rea" > To: "Ascend Users Mail List" > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:16 AM > Subject: (ASCEND) No routing on MAX 4002 (Try Again!) > > > > > > > > We just got a bare Max 4002 to replace a box that went south. We put in 3 > > 56k by 16 modem cards and loaded version 7.0.26 software in the box. We > > did a fclear and nvramclear and put in our same setup we use in the 4048's > > that we use. The only real difference I can tell on this box is it has the > > fire wall option and has no frame relay option. > > > > Anyway, we use channelized T1's and we set that up. We set up a default > > gateway to our Linux router under the default static route. We do not use > > any of the connection profiles but use the answer profile as our default. > > > > Under the mod config->ethernet we set up IP address, Rip send v1 (as we do > > on all our 4048's), Ignore def rt = yes, proxy mode = active, filter = 0. > > > > The 4002 will ping to the outside world (as well as our net) just fine. > > When a client calls into the modem, they can ping the box but the cannot > > get any further that the max 4002 box. > > > > I looked at out gated router and in the logs it looks like the router > > doesn't want any rip info from this machine. The message in the log looks > > like: > > "Aug 27 09:30:09 rip_recv: ignoring RIP Request packet from > > 209.102.125.10+520 - not supplying RIP" > > > > The 209.102.125.10 is the ethernet IP address for this MAX 4002. > > > > Is there some place where the RIP request have passwords added to them? I > > know RIP can have passwords but I have never seen this on my 4048's or > > 6096. > > > > Has anyone run into this problem before? Can anyone point me in the > > correct direction? Any help will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken Rea > > wildcat@pcez.com > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > Ken Rea wildcat@pcez.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Aug 28 20:14:56 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 Message-ID: Hi Peter, there have been multiple Buffer overrun vulnerabilities discovered in radiusd's descended from livingston's original implementation. the ascendd which you mention is apparently affected, as well as the extant versions of livingtson radius. These are non-product versions of the daemon which have been available from Livingston and Ascend, which have been freely available in source code form for a long time. They are not supported by Lucent. I can't comment on the security of third party radiusd's, but Lucent's Product NavisRadius 3.X/4.X uses Java rather than C, which provides runtime boundary checks which should provide some protection from this form of attack. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter.DeSchrijver@netcom-kassel.de > [mailto:Peter.DeSchrijver@netcom-kassel.de] > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:46 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 > > > Hi all ! > > I am currently using ascendd 1.16 and I?d like to give my users new > usernames. > For administrative reasons the emailadress seems a good Idea. > > Is 1.16 (980618!) the most current/safest ascendd ? > > TIA > Peter De Schrijver > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Tue Aug 28 21:02:11 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 In-Reply-To: <9BB322CA0F24D011A1BB00C095ED473401FC5CFF@PRIMARY> Message-ID: I would reccomend against using Ascend's radius. Try Cistron Radiusd (or FreeRadius when it's ready), see http://www.freeradius.org for details. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** Peter.DeSchrijver@netcom-kassel.de ** Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:46 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Radius ascendd 1.16 ** ** ** Hi all ! ** ** I am currently using ascendd 1.16 and I?d like to give my users new ** usernames. ** For administrative reasons the emailadress seems a good Idea. ** ** Is 1.16 (980618!) the most current/safest ascendd ? ** ** TIA ** Peter De Schrijver ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hwray at gpnetworking.com Thu Aug 30 09:36:23 2001 From: hwray at gpnetworking.com (hwray) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray Message-ID: <70611CD50E5F88479E549E4E1BF74E032189@mail.Big_Stuff.Gpnetworking.com> Dear Sir I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the password. Someone from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that can help me get into the router and recover the password. When I did a search on Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in locating the software. Any help would be appreciated. Hamilton Wray ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From shovey at buffnet.net Thu Aug 30 10:43:14 2001 From: shovey at buffnet.net (Stephen Hovey) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Sorta off topic Message-ID: Due to licensing issue with luscent, someone posted on the ascend list about some other unit - netsync or something - could someone tell me what it was again? Also, are there any unit known not to work well with freebsd working generic radius services? Sorry for the combo ot posting. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rbatista at vento.com.br Thu Aug 30 13:46:19 2001 From: rbatista at vento.com.br (Ricardo) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ENC: MAX TNT Problems Message-ID: -----Mensagem original----- De: Ricardo [mailto:rbatista@vento.com.br] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 30 de agosto de 2001 15:44 Para: matt@ascend.com Cc: suporte@centertap.com.br Assunto: MAX TNT Problems I have got one chennelized E1, then I use the Time Slots division to my customers. It's working like a clear channel. My problem is the follow : The performance of each link, between my Max TNT, where the E1 channelized is installed, and the client router, is very BAD. In clients point they have got one Cisco router, usually 805 or 1005 model. When I start a Ping command the result is like shows below: " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!" I improve the timeout but doesn't solve the problem. I have misses of packets. When I start a Debup IP error, in cisco route (client point) I have a messagem like this : "5d19h: IP: s=10.32.0.1 (serial 0), d=10.32.1.230, len 100, dispose ip.checksumerr" I did a revision in all parameters of the cisco and nothing changed. My question is the follow : Is there any configuration that I need to set to use this service in MAX TNT ? I think that after the chanellized E1 arrived next to full utilizantion (28 working in 30 available) the problem began. I don't know ... Maybe there are especial parameters to set that solve my problem , can be in TNT or in Cisco. I tried show the Max CPU utilization but,this command there isn't in MAX. Can You help me ? I need to solve this problem urgent ! Thanks to your attention. Regards Ricardo ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From schneider1_scott at yahoo.com Thu Aug 30 10:23:43 2001 From: schneider1_scott at yahoo.com (Scott Schneider) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray Message-ID: <20010830152343.30777.qmail@web12502.mail.yahoo.com> http://www.lucent.com/products/applications/navis_demo.html -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of hwray Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:36 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray Dear Sir I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the password. Someone from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that can help me get into the router and recover the password. When I did a search on Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in locating the software. Any help would be appreciated. Hamilton Wray ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Aug 30 11:11:34 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray In-Reply-To: <70611CD50E5F88479E549E4E1BF74E032189@mail.Big_Stuff.Gpnetworking.com> Message-ID: Navisaccess will NOT help you regain access to the router. You can, however, search the web for 'Ascend Nindy', which should return several results. Here's a link to that search on google: http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of hwray ** Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:36 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray ** ** ** Dear Sir ** ** I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the password. Someone ** from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that can help me ** get into the router and recover the password. When I did a search on ** Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. ** That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the ** product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in locating the ** software. Any help would be appreciated. ** ** Hamilton Wray ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Aug 30 17:51:54 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray Message-ID: Please be aware that opening the case (as required for most Nindy's) voids any warranty. NavisAccess allows you to download the configs using SNMP (Initiates a TFTP request from the MAX). The password is in the config file. if NA is not an option (?) then the same thing can be done by manually setting the MIB variables in SNMP. TAC or your Reseller can help you with that if you require. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:12 AM > To: hwray; ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray > > > > Navisaccess will NOT help you regain access to the router. > > You can, however, search the web for 'Ascend Nindy', which > should return > several results. Here's a link to that search on google: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of hwray > ** Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:36 AM > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray > ** > ** > ** Dear Sir > ** > ** I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the > password. Someone > ** from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that > can help me > ** get into the router and recover the password. When I did a > search on > ** Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. > ** That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the > ** product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in > locating the > ** software. Any help would be appreciated. > ** > ** Hamilton Wray > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ascenduser at yahoo.com Thu Aug 30 21:28:30 2001 From: ascenduser at yahoo.com (Jack Farad) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:06 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Callback and Analog modems ! Message-ID: <20010831022830.22584.qmail@web20310.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, Is it possible to configure a MAX TNT with analog modems to dialback(callback). This is working with Cisco and Shiva, but what about MAX TNT. If the modems are digital, I know that callback is supported and also CLID (the first version for ISDN callback is 7.2.4). thanks a lot, Jack __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From schneider1_scott at yahoo.com Thu Aug 30 16:56:15 2001 From: schneider1_scott at yahoo.com (Scott Schneider) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:07 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray Message-ID: <20010830215615.3117.qmail@web12502.mail.yahoo.com> Troy, Actually, that is not true. If you know the SNMP community string for the device you can download the configuration for the device and view/edit/change the password. However, this is true if you do not know what the SNMP "write" Community string is, or have disabled SNMP on the device all together. Kind Regards, -Scott Navisaccess will NOT help you regain access to the router. You can, however, search the web for 'Ascend Nindy', which should return several results. Here's a link to that search on google: http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of hwray ** Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:36 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray ** ** ** Dear Sir ** ** I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the password. Someone ** from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that can help me ** get into the router and recover the password. When I did a search on ** Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. ** That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the ** product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in locating the ** software. Any help would be appreciated. ** ** Hamilton Wray ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net Fri Aug 31 09:47:34 2001 From: jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:07 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Daley, Greg (Greg) wrote: > Please be aware that opening the case (as required for > most Nindy's) voids any warranty. I've not seen a device yet that could not be opened and closed without breaking the precious "this will call down the wrath of god" stickers. > NavisAccess allows you to download the configs using SNMP > (Initiates a TFTP request from the MAX). The password is > in the config file. The password(s) will be in the config file if you configured the MAX to show it in the config file. As I recall, the default is not to show them. AND, this requires SNMP *WRITE* access to the MAX -- which is *not* setup by default. > if NA is not an option (?) then the same thing can > be done by manually setting the MIB variables in SNMP. > > TAC or your Reseller can help you with that if you require. Leave it to a Lucent employee to force you have a support contract... SNMPSET="snmpset -v 1 ${node} ${comm}" SNMPGET="snmpget -v 1 -Oq ${node} ${comm}" #echo "1..." ## sysConfigTftpHostAddr ## sysConfigTftpFilename ## sysConfigTftpPort ## sysConfigTftpParameter (profile list) ${SNMPSET} \ sysConfigTftpHostAddr.${index} a 208.216.228.200 \ sysConfigTftpFilename.${index} s ${dest} \ sysConfigTftpPort.${index} i 69 \ > /dev/null #echo "2..." ## sysConfigTftpCmd ## :: - 1 save ## :: - 3 saveAll echo " ... commencing transfer ..." ${SNMPSET} sysConfigTftpCmd.${index} i 1 > /dev/null ## sysConfigTftpStatus ## :: - 1 ok ## :: - 17 inProgress status=`${SNMPGET} sysConfigTftpStatus.${index} | cut -d' ' -f2` You'll need the "ascend.mib" for those OIDs. --Ricky ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gordo at lucent.com Fri Aug 31 13:03:35 2001 From: gordo at lucent.com (Gordon Mackenzie) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:07 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray References: <200108310545.WAA12316@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3B8FD177.8060800@lucent.com> NavisAccess, a fine old Ascend product, is like most other fine old Ascend products in that it is available from Lucent. You could just search Lucent...Or... http://www.lucent.com/products/solution/0,,CTID+6-STID+10345-SOID+1261-LOCL+1,00.html I believe there is an evaluation copy available by request on the above page. > From: "hwray" > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:36:23 -0400 > Subject: (ASCEND) From Hamilton Wray > > Dear Sir > > I have a client with an ascend router who has lost the password. Someone > from Avaya told me about a product called Navisaccess that can help me > get into the router and recover the password. When I did a search on > Navisaccess it directed me to www.aqscend.com/navisaccessdemo. > That site is no longer operational and I am not able to find the > product. I'm wondering if you could possibly assist me in locating the > software. Any help would be appreciated. > > Hamilton Wray > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ -- Gordon Mackenzie (510) 747-2790 Software Quality Assurance < Alameda < Access Engineering < INS < Lucent mailto:gordo@lucent.com http://www.lucent.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Aug 31 10:49:13 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:08 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT 9.0.2 accepting 64k data calls Message-ID: All, I've got a TNT running 9.0.2: Shelf 1 ( standalone ): Reqd Oper Slot Type { shelf-1 slot-1 0 } UP UP madd2-card { shelf-1 slot-2 0 } UP UP madd2-card { shelf-1 slot-9 0 } UP UP t3-card According to the telco, the TNT isn't accepting the 64k data calls. From what I can see, the calls aren't being completed for the TNT to reject. Is there something that I need to check to see that the TNT is properly configured to accept ISDN calls? TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/