Maybe you can provide the list with how long you have been running V.92 to support the other statement you made "(Formerly 56k=v.Unreliable)" or are you just promoting V.92? Everything I have seen related to V.92 on these lists including this one says V.92 is the ".unreliable" Obviously 56k (V.90) is not great but it is much better than V.34 and haven't seen anyone so pleased with V.92 to brag about it to spend the $ to make the upgrade change. Hopefully you can give us your feedback. Thanks. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Richard Gamberg wrote: > > I've put up a new page to list ISPs that support V.92; > > If you're offering V.92, let the world know by filling in the form to add > your biz to the list: > > www.modemsite.com/56k/v92isp.htm > > Aloha, > Richard Gamberg, Publisher > (Formerly 56k=v.Unreliable) > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/