From kristina at greatbasin.net Tue Jan 2 10:59:54 2001 From: kristina at greatbasin.net (Kristina Pfaff-Harris) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Maxen losing their Radius IP pools? In-Reply-To: <200101021643.IAA20199@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: Recently, we started working with FreeRadius. It works great, pretty much, except we just started noticing that some of our maxen are losing track of their Radius-assigned IP pools. When a Max reboots, I can see the pools-maxX users getting authenticated properly through Radius, but somehow the Max either never gets the pool, or takes a long time (sometimes up to 5 minutes or more) to get them. We're using 7.0.26 -- has anyone else had this problem? So far, we've been working around it by statically configuring pools on the maxen, but this is (to say the least) not ideal. Kristina ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cclements at cp-tel.net Tue Jan 2 10:26:40 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) How many digits to send to the MAX? Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010102101902.00a1b6b0@cp-tel.net> Engineers, I have heard that a MAX is very sensitive to the number of digits that is sent from a telco, in this case a DMS-10 (CT1). We are experiencing a fast busy on a new unit that I am configuring and have heard that the trouble could possibly be in the digits sent by the switch. Should I have the telco delete the digits that are sent to MAX? I have found a setting (TAOS 8.0.1) for "Trunk Digits" is this something I should be concerned with? Any ideas? Chris Clements ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cclements at cp-tel.net Tue Jan 2 16:13:13 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Using a Lucent MAX 6000 on a CT-1 from a DMS10 Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010102160951.00a2b100@cp-tel.net> Engineers, We are attempting to build a CT-1 from our DMS-10 to a Lucent MAX 6000 series access router. We would like very much to consult an ILEC or CLEC that has gotten this to work. A printout of the Trunk Group Parameters with special notes as to what the MAX is looking for would be ideal. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Chris Clements From carll at forcomm.net Wed Jan 3 13:01:04 2001 From: carll at forcomm.net (Carl Jagerski) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX TNT IP Addresses Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20010103135137.0343f9c0@mail.forcomm.net> Hi Everyone, Up until now I have been using 4048 and 6000 units which all require less than a class C (or /24) worth of IP addresses for the IP Pools. Now, our company just acquired a MAX TNT that has 672 ports in it. That's over 2.5 class C's. All I have is class C's and none of them are contiguous. Nor do I have any subnets of a class B. So, How do I assign 2.5+ class C's in the MAX TNT. Does anyone have a snippit of a config to show me how it's done. Does it have to do with routing issues in the MAX or is there some other magic at work here. Any help would be appreciated to point me in the right direction. TIA Carl Jagerski Network Administrator, Forward Communications carll@forcomm.net 724-378-4490 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdavies at britishvita.com Thu Jan 4 03:46:22 2001 From: gdavies at britishvita.com (Gary Davies) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend max 6000 help Message-ID: Hi all, Can someone help me with the setup of a max 6000 software V 8.0.2 with euro ISDN30 i've tried every combination but must be missing something. The remote end log says destination incompatible. I have spoke to the telco (BT) and they say the line euro ISDN. I have the following line setup. Sig Mode = ISDN Switch type =net 5 ( Dass 2 is the only other option that nearly suits) ISDN TE/NT mode=TE Framing Mode=G.703 The rest is mostly NA Ananlogue is working great the ISDN log says NL: CALL REJECTED/INVALID CONTENTS B3 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 88 B2 I must be missing something simple but can't see the wood for the trees Any help appreciated Gary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and the information it contains may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact us immediately. You should not disclose the contents to any other person nor make copies. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010104/c765fc7a/attachment.html From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Fri Jan 5 13:30:34 2001 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX4048's For sale Message-ID: <004901c0774d$faf19f60$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> We have MAX4048's for sale. They have the MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards in them. I will sell whole units or just spare cards. Cleaned, Tested and Warrantied. Please respond offline or call me. Regards, Scott Woodland scott@millenniumsolutions.net Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010105/9d5ffd5f/attachment.htm From tom at ytram.com Fri Jan 5 12:42:32 2001 From: tom at ytram.com (Tom Allebrandi) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Cellpipe 50A questions Message-ID: <000001c07747$45b2c120$4f00a8c0@spooky> Hi! Apologies in advance if this is an FAQ item** or has been beaten to death... We have a Cellpipe 50A gluing our LAN to our Internet DSL connection. Pings and traceroutes work fine among the devices on the LAN but trying to ping/traceroute from the LAN to an Internet host doesn't work. Wandering around the Web, I found what I think is the archives of this mailing list. This appears to be a known problem with Ascend routers in general, but I couldn't really tell if it is a CURRENT problem. And that is my question: Is this a current problem with the Lucent (nee Ascend) Cellpipe 50A? Our Cellpipe has software version 7.10.7. Thanks! --- Tom ** The URL http://www.nealis/ascend/faq (as shown in the trailer of the mailing list messages) doesn't seem to work for me. I'm running IE 5.5 on Win98 and Win NT and I always get a page not found error both here at the office and at home. Is this working for anyone else? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Fri Jan 5 12:44:24 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'd guess that neither the Max or the Radius server was at fault. It was a simple mis-match between the users file and the dictionary. Changing it in the dictionary fixed the problem. Changing the attribute name in the users file would have also fixed the problem. My .02, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Kristina ** Pfaff-Harris ** Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 6:05 PM ** To: Greg Daley ** Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved ** ** ** ** On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Greg Daley wrote: ** ** > The Max doesn't ever see the name of the Attribute. ** ** I didn't think it should. But the question then remains, why did ** switching only the name of the attribute fix the problem? The Maxes seem ** to take either "User-Service" or "Service-Type" just fine for user ** authentication, as long as it's attribute 6. However, pools users, while ** authenticating just fine with "Service-Type" never got the pools into the ** Max. Wouldn't this suggest that there is some bug in the Max itself? I ** mean, if the pools users get authenticated (Access-Accept), then the pool ** should get set in the Max, right? I know it's odd, but that is the only ** difference between a Max being able to get it's pools from radius: ** User-Service vs. Service-Type listed as attribute 6 in the dictionary. ** ** > There may have been a conflict in the namespace in the ** > dictionary file. ** ** Maybe. But if it never sees the name, then that shouldn't be a ** problem... ** ** Dunno. It's bizarre. :) ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kristina at greatbasin.net Fri Jan 5 13:46:51 2001 From: kristina at greatbasin.net (Kristina Pfaff-Harris) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Troy Settle wrote: > I'd guess that neither the Max or the Radius server was at fault. It was a > simple mis-match between the users file and the dictionary. Changing it in > the dictionary fixed the problem. Changing the attribute name in the users > file would have also fixed the problem. Thanks to some tips from Greg and the FreeRadius developers, I set up Radius with the old dictionaries and experimented with "radif" on an unused max. The dictionary I was using had two entries for Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition, and one was defined as a Vendor-Specific attribute. Thus, Radius was returning attribute 26 (Vendor-Specific) and not 217 as it should. This was the real problem. Since my "radtest" program shows the Attribute names and not the numbers, the only change I could see was in Service-Type vs. User-Service. So, no max bug, no radius bug: just a configuration problem. I'll know better in the future. :) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jan 4 16:59:20 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010105095920.00c4f5a0@mail.ascend.com.au> At 09:35 AM 1/4/01 -0800, Kristina Pfaff-Harris wrote: > >I wrote earlier saying that my Ascend Maxen couldn't seem to get their >Radius-Assigned IP pools after switching to FreeRadius. The problem >appeared to be just a dictionary issue. FreeRadius attribute 6 is >"Service-Type" while in the old dictionary it was "User-Service." >Apparently, the Maxen don't handle "Service-Type" in a response, but >rather need "User-Service" instead. As soon as I swapped the dictionary >entry: The Max doesn't ever see the name of the Attribute. Please read RFC 2865 or 2138 for details. There may have been a conflict in the namespace in the dictionary file. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kristina at greatbasin.net Thu Jan 4 17:05:24 2001 From: kristina at greatbasin.net (Kristina Pfaff-Harris) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010105095920.00c4f5a0@mail.ascend.com.au> Message-ID: On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Greg Daley wrote: > The Max doesn't ever see the name of the Attribute. I didn't think it should. But the question then remains, why did switching only the name of the attribute fix the problem? The Maxes seem to take either "User-Service" or "Service-Type" just fine for user authentication, as long as it's attribute 6. However, pools users, while authenticating just fine with "Service-Type" never got the pools into the Max. Wouldn't this suggest that there is some bug in the Max itself? I mean, if the pools users get authenticated (Access-Accept), then the pool should get set in the Max, right? I know it's odd, but that is the only difference between a Max being able to get it's pools from radius: User-Service vs. Service-Type listed as attribute 6 in the dictionary. > There may have been a conflict in the namespace in the > dictionary file. Maybe. But if it never sees the name, then that shouldn't be a problem... Dunno. It's bizarre. :) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jan 4 17:27:59 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20010105095920.00c4f5a0@mail.ascend.com.au> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010105102759.00c3fa80@mail.ascend.com.au> At 03:05 PM 1/4/01 -0800, Kristina Pfaff-Harris wrote: > >On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Greg Daley wrote: > >> The Max doesn't ever see the name of the Attribute. > >I didn't think it should. But the question then remains, why did >switching only the name of the attribute fix the problem? The Maxes seem >to take either "User-Service" or "Service-Type" just fine for user >authentication, as long as it's attribute 6. However, pools users, while >authenticating just fine with "Service-Type" never got the pools into the >Max. Wouldn't this suggest that there is some bug in the Max itself? I >mean, if the pools users get authenticated (Access-Accept), then the pool >should get set in the Max, right? I know it's odd, but that is the only >difference between a Max being able to get it's pools from radius: >User-Service vs. Service-Type listed as attribute 6 in the dictionary. It really depends on what the Max is receiving from the Radius Server. I would look to see whether there is a difference in the radif output on the diagnostics screen of the Max. After All, It may be that the radius server is not sending back the attributes correctly. It is only a freeware server. If the problem ends up being on the max, and you'd like to follow it up, you could talk to the TAC. >> There may have been a conflict in the namespace in the >> dictionary file. > >Maybe. But if it never sees the name, then that shouldn't be a problem... The conflict would be within the radius server itself. (with its own dictionary). If there are problems, then it would probably report it by error debug. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From blaz at amis.net Thu Jan 4 14:39:17 2001 From: blaz at amis.net (Blaz Zupan) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > Is there any opinion on the 8.0.x (8.0.4 is the latest I think) release? We're running 8.0.3 on all our boxes without problems, except for a misterious modem card hang, where suddenly all modems on a card went to the dead list. A reboot fixed it. But that happened only once and never again, for more than two months now. Blaz Zupan, Medinet d.o.o, Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia E-mail: blaz@amis.net, Tel: +386-2-320-6320, Fax: +386-2-320-6325 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From carll at forcomm.net Thu Jan 4 11:42:43 2001 From: carll at forcomm.net (Carl Jagerski) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT IP Addresses In-Reply-To: <00f701c075cf$025c3010$144e3ad1@jahil> References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010103135137.0343f9c0@mail.forcomm.net> Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010104124127.02936800@mail.forcomm.net> Where do you put the secondary IP address ? At 1/3/01 04:49 PM, you wrote: >well I am not that much expert in Lucent/MAX but I am running two class C in >my MaxTNT. > > The way is very simple. just assign ip pools 1,2,3.... and what u >need is to have >a secondary ip address entry if you are using Cisco as a gateway. and it >will work. > > > i hope it will help . >With Regards >Ahsan Khan >Sr. System Admin >Internet Division (OneNet) >Sun Communication Pvt. Ltd. >Pakistan >http://ahsank.one.net.pk >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Carl Jagerski" >To: >Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 12:01 AM >Subject: (ASCEND) MAX TNT IP Addresses > > > > Hi Everyone, > > Up until now I have been using 4048 and 6000 units which all > > require less than a class C (or /24) worth of IP addresses for > > the IP Pools. Now, our company just acquired a MAX TNT that has > > 672 ports in it. That's over 2.5 class C's. All I have is > > class C's and none of them are contiguous. Nor do I have any > > subnets of a class B. So, How do I assign 2.5+ class C's in > > the MAX TNT. Does anyone have a snippit of a config to show > > me how it's done. Does it have to do with routing issues in > > the MAX or is there some other magic at work here. Any help > > would be appreciated to point me in the right direction. > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > Carl Jagerski > > Network Administrator, Forward Communications > > carll@forcomm.net > > 724-378-4490 > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > To get FAQ'd: > > Carl Jagerski Network Administrator, Forward Communications carll@forcomm.net 724-378-4490 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jan 4 17:10:14 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 6000s, PRIs and modem cards. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010105101014.00c5e6c0@mail.ascend.com.au> At 03:57 PM 1/4/01 -0500, //Stany wrote: > >Good day. > >I have two Ascend MAX 6000s (model number: MX60-T1AC-48NA), each with 4 12 >modem cards. Each unit has 4 T1s running into it. > >I did the math, and assuming that each T1 line has 24 PRIs, and I actually >have only 48 modems, it seems like I am paying for 2 extra T1s running to >each unit, that are not really being used. > >Is that actually the case? Will there be any adverse effects if I would >terminate 4 T1s, and have only 2 T1s running to each of the MAXes? > >If there is any documentation on this that I can read up, pointers would >be much appreciated as well. The Max has onboard HDLC resources which it uses to terminate Digital 64K/56K calls, as from an ISDN BRI. THe modems are for analogue (client modem like V.90) connections. With 48 modems you can thus terminate 48 analogue calls. The other 48/44 (-4 * D channels) calls would have to be digital data calls, terminated on the on-board hdlc resources If you have ISDN dialup users, you may want to keep one or more of the T1 lines beyond the 2 you have modems to support. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Lee.Jones at innosoft.com Thu Jan 4 15:53:15 2001 From: Lee.Jones at innosoft.com (Lee Jones) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 6000s, PRIs and modem cards. In-Reply-To: "Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2001 15:57:44 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: <01JYIFQTG4YI9858B1@innosoft.com> > I have two Ascend MAX 6000s (model number: MX60-T1AC-48NA), each with > 4 12 modem cards. Each unit has 4 T1s running into it. > I did the math, and assuming that each T1 line has 24 PRIs, and I actually > have only 48 modems, it seems like I am paying for 2 extra T1s running to > each unit, that are not really being used. I assume you mean T1 PRI lines with 23 B channels and 1 D channel. This would support 23 simultaneous calls on each T1. You might also mean T1 DCS (aka channelized T1) with 24 B channels and in-band signalling. This would support 24 simultaneous calls on each T1. > Is that actually the case? Will there be any adverse effects if I would > terminate 4 T1s, and have only 2 T1s running to each of the MAXes? Depends. Are you accepting ISDN calls? If so, you need 1 or 2 channels on a T1, depending on bandwidth provided, for each caller. If you are purely modem calls, then common practice is to have a couple more modems in your pool than B channels. This prevents your customers from getting a rings, no-answer condition because a few modems are out of service or otherwise unavailable. Lee Jones ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From psc5 at powersupply.net Thu Jan 4 06:32:56 2001 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (psc5) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k Message-ID: <273122001144123256194@powersupply.net> We have several max 6k's and are looking to load a newer version of the code. We use tbixkh.m60 and up until last week were running 7.0.22. We were having the usual Ascend problems (hangups, re-boots for no apparent reason, modem stalls regularly) and decided to try some new code. We upgraded to 7.0.26 and have been running it for a week. I am not totally happy with this version. I have had to re-boot one of the machines twice myself because we had people calling saying they can't log on and nothing seemed to be wrong, but after re-booting the max, things worked better. hmmmmm! So, I am asking for advice on good, stable code that generally works well with all brands of modems. And, I understand I just asked the impossible. Thanks, John ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Wed Jan 3 20:58:11 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Suspect Lan Modem In-Reply-To: <200101031728550880.05840DB9@mail.westcomm.net> Message-ID: Chris, I've not seen hide nor hair of the FAQ in at least a year (maybe two?). I emailed Jason to find out if he could provide me a copy. If I can get my hands on it, I'll put it up on one of my servers (maybe even update it) then email Dave to change the URL in the footer. If nothing else, folks are more than welcome to email me off-list with their Ascend goodies, and I'll make an attempt at assembling a FAQ (need something to entertain me now that I'm wrapped up in business admin crap). I don't pretend to be an expert with the Ascend stuff, but I can generally hold my own on the Pipeline and Max families (though I've not had my hands on a TNT yet). Second, The trap you posted was for the 12th modem in the 7th slot (card in the top right slot). Modems occupy slots 3-8 in the Max 6000. As near as I can tell, you'll get a suspect modem trap every time there's a connection failure. The max is generally pretty good at determining the cause of the failure, but will default to assuming that it's modem is possibly bad (which just might be the case). Anyhoo, hope this helps, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Chris West ** Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 6:29 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Suspect Lan Modem ** ** ** First of all...where are the FAQs these days? ** ** Second, ** ** I am receiving multiple SNMP traps from one of my Max 6000 units ** running 8.0.3 software. A sample trap is as follows: ** ** Trap(ascend-6.20) suspectLanModemSlotIndex.7.12=7 ** suspectLanModemPortIndex.7.12=12 ** suspectLanModemUsedCount.7.12=35 suspectLanModemBadCount.7.12=4 ** suspectLanModemLast32.7.12=12578555 ** ** My question is this: Where do I find an explanation on the ** above and how do I tell what modem/slot this problem belongs to. ** The SlotIndex and PortIndex numbers change so it is not always ** the same one. ** ** Thanks ** -- ** Chris West - N5LTC ** WCS Communications ** 915-949-3000 ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kas at lucent.com Thu Jan 4 17:02:39 2001 From: kas at lucent.com (Kevin A. Smith) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 6000s, PRIs and modem cards. In-Reply-To: <01JYIFQTG4YI9858B1@innosoft.com> References: <"Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2001 15:57:44 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010104145722.00dbfcf0@akita.eng.ascend.com> At 01:53 PM 1/4/2001 -0800, Lee Jones wrote: > > I have two Ascend MAX 6000s (model number: MX60-T1AC-48NA), each with > > 4 12 modem cards. Each unit has 4 T1s running into it. > > > Is that actually the case? Will there be any adverse effects if I would > > terminate 4 T1s, and have only 2 T1s running to each of the MAXes? > >Depends. > >Are you accepting ISDN calls? If so, you need 1 or 2 channels on >a T1, depending on bandwidth provided, for each caller. That seems a bit confusing. The MAX is not typically configured for exactly the right number of users.....oversubscription is very typical. The tricky part here is to balance between ISDN and modem calls such that you would never allow more modem calls that the number of installed modems.....so you need to expect a 50/50 split between modem and ISDN calls - which is pretty uncommon. >If you are purely modem calls, then common practice is to have >a couple more modems in your pool than B channels. This prevents >your customers from getting a rings, no-answer condition because >a few modems are out of service or otherwise unavailable. True....though the latest modem cards are much more reliable, and recycle quickly. Also, how you manage your hunt-groups and channel assignment can help alleviate this where you have a more than one MAX. Kevin Smith Yahoo Messenger: kevin_smith KAS@lucent.com 1 (510) 708-8010 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Thu Jan 4 18:32:51 2001 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question Message-ID: Dear folks, I posted a similar question some weeks ago but didn't notice any answer so here ist is once again. Imagine the situation where there is a single Max with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary and backup radius-server for authentication and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some callers are getting static ip assignments (Framed-Address/Netmask). The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. The pool gets summarized. Within Radius there are also some static routes with dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver and thingies like that). All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost ready and will be reachable via the same number than the current ones. Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. The Maxen have different pools configured. But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help because if they dial in instead of getting called and they connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. Aaah! Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you very much! Regards, Sascha ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Thu Jan 4 11:32:25 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT IP Addresses In-Reply-To: <200101040645.WAA26896@max.bungi.com> References: <200101040645.WAA26896@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Carl Jagerski > > Up until now I have been using 4048 and 6000 units which all >require less than a class C (or /24) worth of IP addresses for >the IP Pools. Now, our company just acquired a MAX TNT that has >672 ports in it. That's over 2.5 class C's. All I have is >class C's and none of them are contiguous. Nor do I have any >subnets of a class B. So, How do I assign 2.5+ class C's in >the MAX TNT. Does anyone have a snippit of a config to show >me how it's done. Does it have to do with routing issues in >the MAX or is there some other magic at work here. Any help >would be appreciated to point me in the right direction. Read the section of the TNT's docs pertaining to IP pools. In a nutshell, set up three pools of a Class C each and assigned pool 0 in your profiles. The TNT will take an available address from any pool. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kristina at greatbasin.net Thu Jan 4 11:35:31 2001 From: kristina at greatbasin.net (Kristina Pfaff-Harris) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Maxen losing IP pools problem solved Message-ID: I wrote earlier saying that my Ascend Maxen couldn't seem to get their Radius-Assigned IP pools after switching to FreeRadius. The problem appeared to be just a dictionary issue. FreeRadius attribute 6 is "Service-Type" while in the old dictionary it was "User-Service." Apparently, the Maxen don't handle "Service-Type" in a response, but rather need "User-Service" instead. As soon as I swapped the dictionary entry: ATTRIBUTE Service-Type 6 integer with: ATTRIBUTE User-Service 6 integer The Radius-assigned IP pools started working again. K. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From baron at lava.net Thu Jan 4 13:24:38 2001 From: baron at lava.net (Baron Fujimoto) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k In-Reply-To: <008c01c07668$6db92360$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> Message-ID: On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Dennis Duval wrote: : > We have several max 6k's and are looking to load a newer version of : > the code. We use tbixkh.m60 and up until last week were running : > 7.0.22. We were having the usual Ascend problems (hangups, re-boots : > for no apparent reason, modem stalls regularly) and decided to try : > some new code. We upgraded to 7.0.26 and have been running it for a : : I highly recommend that you upgrade your 6000s to at least 7.2.3. I beleive : it is the most stable version ever released for the 6000. Is there any opinion on the 8.0.x (8.0.4 is the latest I think) release? btw, anyone know of a good archive of this mailing list? I used to use the one at nexial.com, but they appear to have stopped adding new material in 1998. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jan 4 20:36:32 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010105133632.0259c890@mail.ascend.com.au> At 01:32 AM 1/5/01 +0100, Sascha E. Pollok wrote: >Dear folks, > >I posted a similar question some weeks ago but didn't >notice any answer so here ist is once again. > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary >and backup radius-server for authentication >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some >callers are getting static ip assignments (Framed-Address/Netmask). >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. >The pool gets summarized. > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver >and thingies like that). > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost >ready and will be reachable via the same number than >the current ones. > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. >The Maxen have different pools configured. >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. You can advertise a dialout route on one max, but have lower preference for that route than for the actively connected route, which is configured by radius. The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf would be the "up" route. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From stany at NotBSD.org Thu Jan 4 14:57:44 2001 From: stany at NotBSD.org (//Stany) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000s, PRIs and modem cards. Message-ID: Good day. I have two Ascend MAX 6000s (model number: MX60-T1AC-48NA), each with 4 12 modem cards. Each unit has 4 T1s running into it. I did the math, and assuming that each T1 line has 24 PRIs, and I actually have only 48 modems, it seems like I am paying for 2 extra T1s running to each unit, that are not really being used. Is that actually the case? Will there be any adverse effects if I would terminate 4 T1s, and have only 2 T1s running to each of the MAXes? If there is any documentation on this that I can read up, pointers would be much appreciated as well. Thank you. Signed: //Stany -- +-------+ Stanislav N Vardomskiy - Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis[TM] +-------+ | "Backups we have; it's restores that we find tricky." Richard Letts at ASR | | This message is powered by JOLT! For all the sugar and twice the caffeine. | +--------+ My words are my own. LARTs are provided free of charge. +---------+ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From skipmax at seacove.net Thu Jan 4 10:07:24 2001 From: skipmax at seacove.net (Dennis Duval) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k References: <273122001144123256194@powersupply.net> Message-ID: <008c01c07668$6db92360$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> > We have several max 6k's and are looking to load a newer version of > the code. We use tbixkh.m60 and up until last week were running > 7.0.22. We were having the usual Ascend problems (hangups, re-boots > for no apparent reason, modem stalls regularly) and decided to try > some new code. We upgraded to 7.0.26 and have been running it for a I highly recommend that you upgrade your 6000s to at least 7.2.3. I beleive it is the most stable version ever released for the 6000. I watched this list for quite a while before upgrading to that version, and waited for a very good consensus that it was a good stable release. That was about a year ago. I have been running this ever since on all my 6000s and nearly never have reboots. It fixed many connection problems. I still have some problems with connections from modems with PCTel chipsets, but I think those modems are hopeless pieces of junk anyway. If anyone has comments on the stability of any 8.x releases and how it works with PCTel modems, I would appreciate hearing them. Dennis Duval ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From chris at westcomm.net Wed Jan 3 17:28:55 2001 From: chris at westcomm.net (Chris West) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Lan Modem Message-ID: <200101031728550880.05840DB9@mail.westcomm.net> First of all...where are the FAQs these days? Second, I am receiving multiple SNMP traps from one of my Max 6000 units running 8.0.3 software. A sample trap is as follows: Trap(ascend-6.20) suspectLanModemSlotIndex.7.12=7 suspectLanModemPortIndex.7.12=12 suspectLanModemUsedCount.7.12=35 suspectLanModemBadCount.7.12=4 suspectLanModemLast32.7.12=12578555 My question is this: Where do I find an explanation on the above and how do I tell what modem/slot this problem belongs to. The SlotIndex and PortIndex numbers change so it is not always the same one. Thanks -- Chris West - N5LTC WCS Communications 915-949-3000 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Sun Jan 7 08:03:26 2001 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010105133632.0259c890@mail.ascend.com.au> Message-ID: > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max > >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary > >and backup radius-server for authentication > >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers > >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of > >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some > >callers are getting static ip assignments (Framed-Address/Netmask). > >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. > >The pool gets summarized. > > > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with > >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver > >and thingies like that). > > > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd > >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd > >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost > >ready and will be reachable via the same number than > >the current ones. > > > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting > >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem > >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. > >The Maxen have different pools configured. > >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name > >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only > >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help > >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they > >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max > >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and > >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. > > You can advertise a dialout route on one max, > but have lower preference for that route than for > the actively connected route, which is configured by > radius. > > The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf > would be the "up" route. Greg, I read you answer once again and noticed that you are not talking 'bout metrics but about preferences. I set OSPF ASE Preference = 60 on both Maxen and set the metric of the Dialout-Routes in Radius to some higher value (10). What's happening looks good at first sight: The Ciscorouter sees the route adv. by the Max1 (Max with dialout-routes) with Metric 11. Now, when the user dials in on Max2 (w/o dialout-routes), the route on the Cisco changes to the one with the lower metric (2) and all is working fine. I was happy :-) Until I noticed problems with users having not one single static IP Adress but a subnet like in radius: Framed-Address = 192.168.1.53, Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.252, Framed-Route = "192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 1", The Max where the user dials in gets two routes. One of the directly connected remote router (192.168.1.53/32) and the rest of the subnet: 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53. But THAT 2nd route does not get advertised by the Max where the user has dialed in. Perhaps because there is a 2nd route looking similar (the dialout-route adv. by Max1): max2% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wan18 rGT 60 1 0 389 192.168.1.52/30 ie0 *OG 60 10 0 1224 You see that the 1st route is preferred (obviously because it's connected to Wan18 and the metric is 1) but it won't get advertised! Here's that the Max1 (Dialout Max) sees, while the user is connected to Max2: max1% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wanidle0 SG 120 10 33 1252 The Ciscorouter is only seeing this dialout-route of Max1. I don't know where to get any further. Last night I sat 3h infront of them boxes and everytime I changed something to OSPF and rebooted one, waiting 10 minutes after rebooting until the Telco is again routing calls to this PRI, I fell asleep on my desk for about 30 minutes, wasting 20 minutes time :-))) I am really stuck here. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks! Sascha ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Sun Jan 7 11:22:33 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Sascha, Failing a multi-chassis solution, have you considered announcing your dialout routes on the last max in your huntgroup (ie. the one least likely to have all B channels in use). It's not redundant, but should work fine. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 They told me to think out of the box, but I tripped over it, now I own my own company. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Sascha E. Pollok ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:03 AM ** To: Greg Daley ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question ** ** ** > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max ** > >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary ** > >and backup radius-server for authentication ** > >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers ** > >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of ** > >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some ** > >callers are getting static ip assignments (Framed-Address/Netmask). ** > >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. ** > >The pool gets summarized. ** > > ** > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with ** > >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver ** > >and thingies like that). ** > > ** > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd ** > >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd ** > >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost ** > >ready and will be reachable via the same number than ** > >the current ones. ** > > ** > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting ** > >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem ** > >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. ** > >The Maxen have different pools configured. ** > >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name ** > >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only ** > >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help ** > >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they ** > >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max ** > >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and ** > >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. ** > ** > You can advertise a dialout route on one max, ** > but have lower preference for that route than for ** > the actively connected route, which is configured by ** > radius. ** > ** > The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf ** > would be the "up" route. ** ** Greg, ** ** I read you answer once again and noticed that you are not ** talking 'bout metrics but about preferences. I set ** OSPF ASE Preference = 60 on both Maxen and set the metric ** of the Dialout-Routes in Radius to some higher value (10). ** What's happening looks good at first sight: The Ciscorouter ** sees the route adv. by the Max1 (Max with dialout-routes) ** with Metric 11. Now, when the user dials in on Max2 ** (w/o dialout-routes), the route on the Cisco changes ** to the one with the lower metric (2) and all is working ** fine. I was happy :-) Until I noticed problems with ** users having not one single static IP Adress but ** a subnet like in radius: ** ** Framed-Address = 192.168.1.53, ** Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.252, ** Framed-Route = "192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 1", ** ** The Max where the user dials in gets two routes. One ** of the directly connected remote router (192.168.1.53/32) ** and the rest of the subnet: 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53. ** But THAT 2nd route does not get advertised by the Max ** where the user has dialed in. Perhaps because there is ** a 2nd route looking similar (the dialout-route adv. by Max1): ** ** max2% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 ** ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wan18 rGT 60 1 0 389 ** 192.168.1.52/30 ie0 *OG 60 10 ** 0 1224 ** ** You see that the 1st route is preferred (obviously because it's connected ** to Wan18 and the metric is 1) but it won't get advertised! Here's that ** the Max1 (Dialout Max) sees, while the user is connected to Max2: ** ** max1% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 ** ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wanidle0 SG 120 10 33 1252 ** ** The Ciscorouter is only seeing this dialout-route of Max1. I don't ** know where to get any further. ** ** Last night I sat 3h infront of them boxes and everytime I changed ** something to OSPF and rebooted one, waiting 10 minutes after rebooting ** until the Telco is again routing calls to this PRI, I fell asleep ** on my desk for about 30 minutes, wasting 20 minutes time :-))) I am ** really stuck here. ** ** Any help is greatly appreciated! ** ** Thanks! ** Sascha ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Sun Jan 7 15:09:20 2001 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > I don't know if you can do this or not, but try setting the preference on > dialout routes to 200, leaving the preference on the dialin routes at the > default of 60. You may have to have 2 seperate profiles for dialin and > dialout. I have. Basically the dialouts with 1 Max work fine. Now it's just up to me implementing a 2nd one. The question is: HOW to set the preference for the dialout-routes? > This should cause the Max that recieves the callback to announce the route > with a higher preference, causing the rest of your network to behave > properly. > > Worth a try anyways. Indeed indeed. Thanks so far! Sascha > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: sp@locus.tech.iphh.de [mailto:sp@locus.tech.iphh.de]On Behalf Of > ** Sascha E. Pollok > ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 2:40 PM > ** To: Troy Settle > ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question > ** > ** > ** Troy, thanks for replying, > ** > ** > Failing a multi-chassis solution, have you considered announcing your > ** > dialout routes on the last max in your huntgroup (ie. the one > ** least likely > ** > to have all B channels in use). > ** > ** There is actually no problems with dialing out. The problem is just > ** with the routes advertised (or not) via OSPF. If the last max in the > ** huntgroup dials out and the user calls back and gets logged onto let's > ** say the 1st max, I don't get the IP subnet that the user get's assigned > ** into the OSPF routing table but only the /32 announcement of the > ** remote router's ip address. The Cisco-Router infront of the Maxen > ** still see the /30, /29, /28 or whatever pointing to the dialout-max. > ** The only route that is propagated via OSPF is the /32 host route although > ** the user gets a whole subnet assigned. It seems that the Max the user > ** dials into doesn't advertise the subnet-route because there is already > ** a route within the OSPF domain (coming from the dialout-max). I tried > ** raising the metric for the dialout-routes but that doesn't help anything. > ** > ** > ** Sascha > ** > ** > > ** > ** -----Original Message----- > ** > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > ** Sascha E. Pollok > ** > ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:03 AM > ** > ** To: Greg Daley > ** > ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max > ** > ** > >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary > ** > ** > >and backup radius-server for authentication > ** > ** > >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers > ** > ** > >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of > ** > ** > >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some > ** > ** > >callers are getting static ip assignments > ** (Framed-Address/Netmask). > ** > ** > >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. > ** > ** > >The pool gets summarized. > ** > ** > > > ** > ** > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with > ** > ** > >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver > ** > ** > >and thingies like that). > ** > ** > > > ** > ** > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd > ** > ** > >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd > ** > ** > >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost > ** > ** > >ready and will be reachable via the same number than > ** > ** > >the current ones. > ** > ** > > > ** > ** > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting > ** > ** > >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem > ** > ** > >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. > ** > ** > >The Maxen have different pools configured. > ** > ** > >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name > ** > ** > >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only > ** > ** > >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help > ** > ** > >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they > ** > ** > >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max > ** > ** > >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and > ** > ** > >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. > ** > ** > > ** > ** > You can advertise a dialout route on one max, > ** > ** > but have lower preference for that route than for > ** > ** > the actively connected route, which is configured by > ** > ** > radius. > ** > ** > > ** > ** > The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf > ** > ** > would be the "up" route. > ** > ** > ** > ** Greg, > ** > ** > ** > ** I read you answer once again and noticed that you are not > ** > ** talking 'bout metrics but about preferences. I set > ** > ** OSPF ASE Preference = 60 on both Maxen and set the metric > ** > ** of the Dialout-Routes in Radius to some higher value (10). > ** > ** What's happening looks good at first sight: The Ciscorouter > ** > ** sees the route adv. by the Max1 (Max with dialout-routes) > ** > ** with Metric 11. Now, when the user dials in on Max2 > ** > ** (w/o dialout-routes), the route on the Cisco changes > ** > ** to the one with the lower metric (2) and all is working > ** > ** fine. I was happy :-) Until I noticed problems with > ** > ** users having not one single static IP Adress but > ** > ** a subnet like in radius: > ** > ** > ** > ** Framed-Address = 192.168.1.53, > ** > ** Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.252, > ** > ** Framed-Route = "192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 1", > ** > ** > ** > ** The Max where the user dials in gets two routes. One > ** > ** of the directly connected remote router (192.168.1.53/32) > ** > ** and the rest of the subnet: 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53. > ** > ** But THAT 2nd route does not get advertised by the Max > ** > ** where the user has dialed in. Perhaps because there is > ** > ** a 2nd route looking similar (the dialout-route adv. by Max1): > ** > ** > ** > ** max2% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 > ** > ** > ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met > ** Use Age > ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wan18 rGT 60 1 > ** 0 389 > ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 ie0 *OG 60 10 > ** > ** 0 1224 > ** > ** > ** > ** You see that the 1st route is preferred (obviously because > ** it's connected > ** > ** to Wan18 and the metric is 1) but it won't get advertised! > ** Here's that > ** > ** the Max1 (Dialout Max) sees, while the user is connected to Max2: > ** > ** > ** > ** max1% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 > ** > ** > ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met > ** Use Age > ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wanidle0 SG 120 10 > ** 33 1252 > ** > ** > ** > ** The Ciscorouter is only seeing this dialout-route of Max1. I don't > ** > ** know where to get any further. > ** > ** > ** > ** Last night I sat 3h infront of them boxes and everytime I changed > ** > ** something to OSPF and rebooted one, waiting 10 minutes > ** after rebooting > ** > ** until the Telco is again routing calls to this PRI, I fell asleep > ** > ** on my desk for about 30 minutes, wasting 20 minutes time :-))) I am > ** > ** really stuck here. > ** > ** > ** > ** Any help is greatly appreciated! > ** > ** > ** > ** Thanks! > ** > ** Sascha > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** > ** To get FAQ'd: > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > > ** > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** > To get FAQ'd: > ** > > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Sun Jan 7 13:39:33 2001 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Troy, thanks for replying, > Failing a multi-chassis solution, have you considered announcing your > dialout routes on the last max in your huntgroup (ie. the one least likely > to have all B channels in use). There is actually no problems with dialing out. The problem is just with the routes advertised (or not) via OSPF. If the last max in the huntgroup dials out and the user calls back and gets logged onto let's say the 1st max, I don't get the IP subnet that the user get's assigned into the OSPF routing table but only the /32 announcement of the remote router's ip address. The Cisco-Router infront of the Maxen still see the /30, /29, /28 or whatever pointing to the dialout-max. The only route that is propagated via OSPF is the /32 host route although the user gets a whole subnet assigned. It seems that the Max the user dials into doesn't advertise the subnet-route because there is already a route within the OSPF domain (coming from the dialout-max). I tried raising the metric for the dialout-routes but that doesn't help anything. Sascha > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Sascha E. Pollok > ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:03 AM > ** To: Greg Daley > ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question > ** > ** > ** > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max > ** > >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary > ** > >and backup radius-server for authentication > ** > >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers > ** > >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of > ** > >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some > ** > >callers are getting static ip assignments (Framed-Address/Netmask). > ** > >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. > ** > >The pool gets summarized. > ** > > > ** > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with > ** > >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver > ** > >and thingies like that). > ** > > > ** > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd > ** > >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd > ** > >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost > ** > >ready and will be reachable via the same number than > ** > >the current ones. > ** > > > ** > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting > ** > >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem > ** > >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. > ** > >The Maxen have different pools configured. > ** > >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name > ** > >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only > ** > >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help > ** > >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they > ** > >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max > ** > >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and > ** > >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. > ** > > ** > You can advertise a dialout route on one max, > ** > but have lower preference for that route than for > ** > the actively connected route, which is configured by > ** > radius. > ** > > ** > The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf > ** > would be the "up" route. > ** > ** Greg, > ** > ** I read you answer once again and noticed that you are not > ** talking 'bout metrics but about preferences. I set > ** OSPF ASE Preference = 60 on both Maxen and set the metric > ** of the Dialout-Routes in Radius to some higher value (10). > ** What's happening looks good at first sight: The Ciscorouter > ** sees the route adv. by the Max1 (Max with dialout-routes) > ** with Metric 11. Now, when the user dials in on Max2 > ** (w/o dialout-routes), the route on the Cisco changes > ** to the one with the lower metric (2) and all is working > ** fine. I was happy :-) Until I noticed problems with > ** users having not one single static IP Adress but > ** a subnet like in radius: > ** > ** Framed-Address = 192.168.1.53, > ** Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.252, > ** Framed-Route = "192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 1", > ** > ** The Max where the user dials in gets two routes. One > ** of the directly connected remote router (192.168.1.53/32) > ** and the rest of the subnet: 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53. > ** But THAT 2nd route does not get advertised by the Max > ** where the user has dialed in. Perhaps because there is > ** a 2nd route looking similar (the dialout-route adv. by Max1): > ** > ** max2% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 > ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wan18 rGT 60 1 0 389 > ** 192.168.1.52/30 ie0 *OG 60 10 > ** 0 1224 > ** > ** You see that the 1st route is preferred (obviously because it's connected > ** to Wan18 and the metric is 1) but it won't get advertised! Here's that > ** the Max1 (Dialout Max) sees, while the user is connected to Max2: > ** > ** max1% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 > ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wanidle0 SG 120 10 33 1252 > ** > ** The Ciscorouter is only seeing this dialout-route of Max1. I don't > ** know where to get any further. > ** > ** Last night I sat 3h infront of them boxes and everytime I changed > ** something to OSPF and rebooted one, waiting 10 minutes after rebooting > ** until the Telco is again routing calls to this PRI, I fell asleep > ** on my desk for about 30 minutes, wasting 20 minutes time :-))) I am > ** really stuck here. > ** > ** Any help is greatly appreciated! > ** > ** Thanks! > ** Sascha > ** > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** To get FAQ'd: > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Sun Jan 7 13:16:32 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Well, it was worth a guess. I personally don't use dialout at all and didn't realize that you also did a call-back on it. I don't know if you can do this or not, but try setting the preference on dialout routes to 200, leaving the preference on the dialin routes at the default of 60. You may have to have 2 seperate profiles for dialin and dialout. This should cause the Max that recieves the callback to announce the route with a higher preference, causing the rest of your network to behave properly. Worth a try anyways. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 They told me to think out of the box, but I tripped over it, now I own my own company. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: sp@locus.tech.iphh.de [mailto:sp@locus.tech.iphh.de]On Behalf Of ** Sascha E. Pollok ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 2:40 PM ** To: Troy Settle ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question ** ** ** Troy, thanks for replying, ** ** > Failing a multi-chassis solution, have you considered announcing your ** > dialout routes on the last max in your huntgroup (ie. the one ** least likely ** > to have all B channels in use). ** ** There is actually no problems with dialing out. The problem is just ** with the routes advertised (or not) via OSPF. If the last max in the ** huntgroup dials out and the user calls back and gets logged onto let's ** say the 1st max, I don't get the IP subnet that the user get's assigned ** into the OSPF routing table but only the /32 announcement of the ** remote router's ip address. The Cisco-Router infront of the Maxen ** still see the /30, /29, /28 or whatever pointing to the dialout-max. ** The only route that is propagated via OSPF is the /32 host route although ** the user gets a whole subnet assigned. It seems that the Max the user ** dials into doesn't advertise the subnet-route because there is already ** a route within the OSPF domain (coming from the dialout-max). I tried ** raising the metric for the dialout-routes but that doesn't help anything. ** ** ** Sascha ** ** > ** > ** -----Original Message----- ** > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** Sascha E. Pollok ** > ** Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 9:03 AM ** > ** To: Greg Daley ** > ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com ** > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multiple Maxen design question ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** > >Imagine the situation where there is a single Max ** > ** > >with 2xPRI (30 channels each). There is a primary ** > ** > >and backup radius-server for authentication ** > ** > >and accounting. In addition to authenticating callers ** > ** > >with Username/Password and/or Caller-ID, most of ** > ** > >the users get an IP assignment out of a pool. Some ** > ** > >callers are getting static ip assignments ** (Framed-Address/Netmask). ** > ** > >The Max is advertising it's dialup-routes via OSPF. ** > ** > >The pool gets summarized. ** > ** > > ** > ** > >Within Radius there are also some static routes with ** > ** > >dialup-profiles configured (customers with own mailserver ** > ** > >and thingies like that). ** > ** > > ** > ** > >All is working fine. Now imagine i'd like to add a 2nd ** > ** > >Max to the network due to lack of B-Channels. A 2nd ** > ** > >one is already mounted in the rack, the PRI's are almost ** > ** > >ready and will be reachable via the same number than ** > ** > >the current ones. ** > ** > > ** > ** > >Now problems arise. With only users dialing in and getting ** > ** > >pool or static IP assignments there would be no problem ** > ** > >because the Maxen advertise the IPs connected via OSPF. ** > ** > >The Maxen have different pools configured. ** > ** > >But what about dialout profiles? I could set the Max's name ** > ** > >in the static routes (on the radius-server), so that only ** > ** > >one of the Max's places calls but that wouldn't help ** > ** > >because if they dial in instead of getting called and they ** > ** > >connect to the non-dialing-Max, the "wanna-dial" Max ** > ** > >would still advertise the dialout-routes via OSPF and ** > ** > >we would have two identical routes within the OSPF domain. ** > ** > ** > ** > You can advertise a dialout route on one max, ** > ** > but have lower preference for that route than for ** > ** > the actively connected route, which is configured by ** > ** > radius. ** > ** > ** > ** > The route which will be preferred and propagated by ospf ** > ** > would be the "up" route. ** > ** ** > ** Greg, ** > ** ** > ** I read you answer once again and noticed that you are not ** > ** talking 'bout metrics but about preferences. I set ** > ** OSPF ASE Preference = 60 on both Maxen and set the metric ** > ** of the Dialout-Routes in Radius to some higher value (10). ** > ** What's happening looks good at first sight: The Ciscorouter ** > ** sees the route adv. by the Max1 (Max with dialout-routes) ** > ** with Metric 11. Now, when the user dials in on Max2 ** > ** (w/o dialout-routes), the route on the Cisco changes ** > ** to the one with the lower metric (2) and all is working ** > ** fine. I was happy :-) Until I noticed problems with ** > ** users having not one single static IP Adress but ** > ** a subnet like in radius: ** > ** ** > ** Framed-Address = 192.168.1.53, ** > ** Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.252, ** > ** Framed-Route = "192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 1", ** > ** ** > ** The Max where the user dials in gets two routes. One ** > ** of the directly connected remote router (192.168.1.53/32) ** > ** and the rest of the subnet: 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53. ** > ** But THAT 2nd route does not get advertised by the Max ** > ** where the user has dialed in. Perhaps because there is ** > ** a 2nd route looking similar (the dialout-route adv. by Max1): ** > ** ** > ** max2% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 ** > ** ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met ** Use Age ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wan18 rGT 60 1 ** 0 389 ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 ie0 *OG 60 10 ** > ** 0 1224 ** > ** ** > ** You see that the 1st route is preferred (obviously because ** it's connected ** > ** to Wan18 and the metric is 1) but it won't get advertised! ** Here's that ** > ** the Max1 (Dialout Max) sees, while the user is connected to Max2: ** > ** ** > ** max1% sh ip route 192.168.1.52 ** > ** ** > ** Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met ** Use Age ** > ** 192.168.1.52/30 192.168.1.53 wanidle0 SG 120 10 ** 33 1252 ** > ** ** > ** The Ciscorouter is only seeing this dialout-route of Max1. I don't ** > ** know where to get any further. ** > ** ** > ** Last night I sat 3h infront of them boxes and everytime I changed ** > ** something to OSPF and rebooted one, waiting 10 minutes ** after rebooting ** > ** until the Telco is again routing calls to this PRI, I fell asleep ** > ** on my desk for about 30 minutes, wasting 20 minutes time :-))) I am ** > ** really stuck here. ** > ** ** > ** Any help is greatly appreciated! ** > ** ** > ** Thanks! ** > ** Sascha ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** > ** To get FAQ'd: ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** > To get FAQ'd: ** > ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From lk at uni2.dk Mon Jan 8 08:55:53 2001 From: lk at uni2.dk (Lars Knudsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT versus Lucent Radius Message-ID: <049a01c07983$193bf3d0$0204e382@GUD> Greetings .. I am so sorry if this question does not belong here.. I have a TNT and a Lucent radius where the radius tells me I am wrong when asking for a user "oso" with the password "lars" - eg. 'radauth oso lars' from the TNT. this is the logentry 10 Realms.search: Match null:realm:lookupUser:updateLimits 10 Item setup complete 10 -> ReadUserFile[lookupUser] 30 searchValue = 'oso\000'. 30 FAILURE -- Entry for key 'oso\000' not found in file 'users'. 30 ReadUserFile[lookupUser] -> End-Of-Methods by FAILURE -- Entry for key 'oso\000' not found in file 'users'. 30 oso\000 login failed and this is the users-file oso password=lars As you can see in the logentry, it actually asks for "oso\000" and not just "oso" Any ideas would be helpfull... Med venlig hilsen / Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lars Knudsen | DriftsTekniker | UNI2 | www.uni2.dk | 7730 1227 | Gl.Koge Landevej 55 | 2500 Valby lk@uni2.dk | gud@dulmens.dk | www.dulmens.dk | oso@techie.com| gud@juhuu.dk --> This message has been sent on 100% recycled electrons <-- --- __o- --- _-\<,_ Service der rykker --- (-)/ (-) ------------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Mon Jan 8 10:07:24 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) TNT versus Lucent Radius References: <049a01c07983$193bf3d0$0204e382@GUD> Message-ID: <3A59E5BC.8070801@lucentradius.com> > oso password=lars > > As you can see in the logentry, it actually asks for "oso\000" and not just "oso" > > Any ideas would be helpfull... TAOS is non-RFC compliant for RADIUS and adds a null on the end of all strings. In NAvisRadius you need to set the server_properties file entry Allow_Ascend_Nulls_In_Attributes to true if only using TAOS boxes. If using a mix and you need nulls in attributes then you can set a per client override in client_properties. Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From unilk at inet.uni2.dk Mon Jan 8 13:20:50 2001 From: unilk at inet.uni2.dk (Lars Knudsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) TNT versus Lucent Radius In-Reply-To: <3A59E5BC.8070801@lucentradius.com> Message-ID: Tanx.. That really did it.. Thank you. /Lars Knudsen On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Thomas C Kinnen wrote: > > oso password=lars > > > > As you can see in the logentry, it actually asks for "oso\000" and not just "oso" > > > > Any ideas would be helpfull... > > > TAOS is non-RFC compliant for RADIUS and adds a null on the end of all strings. > In NAvisRadius you need to set the server_properties file entry > Allow_Ascend_Nulls_In_Attributes to true if only using TAOS boxes. If using a > mix and you need nulls in attributes then you can set a per client override in > client_properties. > > Thomas C Kinnen - > [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS > "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, > unless they were given to me by my employer" > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From dave at mi-web.com Mon Jan 8 13:49:57 2001 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) [OT] Checking Bandwidth Message-ID: Hi there. All indicators so far point to a lack of true T1 bandwidth from our provider, but I'd like to run a couple more tests before I offer them "proof". We've been getting barraged with customer calls that moving around the 'net has been horrible the last few weeks. I'm wondering if any of you fine folks could help me out. What I need is a couple/few URLs to files that are known to be served up on a good running hi-speed line, and some download speeds that you get on your good running hi-speed line (T1 or cable or whatever) when you transfer them. I'd like to make some comparisons to what I'm getting on ours. These could be either HTTP or allowed anonymous FTP. What I'm looking for are files around the 1 to 2 Meg size so that the average download rate should be settled down by the time it reaches the end of them. And preferably from a site that just hums right along. I've run a few tests so far, but I have no real way of knowing that any of them are being served up at peak speed. I appreciate any help offered. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From psc5 at powersupply.net Mon Jan 8 12:57:26 2001 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (PowerNet) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200101081357260681.3D5934BE@mail.powersupply.net> Actually, I think 9.0.0 is now available. Has anyone tried this release? I am trying to find some code that works better with some of the newer computers and modems. We have a ton of problems with compaq's and HP's Anyone using code that works very well with these computers? John *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 1/4/2001 at 9:39 PM Blaz Zupan wrote: >> Is there any opinion on the 8.0.x (8.0.4 is the latest I think) release? > >We're running 8.0.3 on all our boxes without problems, except for a misterious >modem card hang, where suddenly all modems on a card went to the dead list. A >reboot fixed it. But that happened only once and never again, for more than >two months now. > >Blaz Zupan, Medinet d.o.o, Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia >E-mail: blaz@amis.net, Tel: +386-2-320-6320, Fax: +386-2-320-6325 > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at aobe.com Mon Jan 8 15:21:16 2001 From: scott at aobe.com (Scott Starbuck) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) [OT] Checking Bandwidth References: Message-ID: <3A5A2F4B.AC7553A2@aobe.com> Hi Dave, One location I'm aware of is http://speedtest.mybc.com - a BellSouth tech showed this to me when we were setting up a DSL line for one of our customers. They have several different size files to choose from including 1, 2, 5, and 10meg tests. The max throughput is 4Mbps. Scott ------ Dave Higgins wrote: > Hi there. > > All indicators so far point to a lack of true T1 bandwidth from our > provider, but I'd like to run a couple more tests before I offer them > "proof". We've been getting barraged with customer calls that moving around > the 'net has been horrible the last few weeks. I'm wondering if any of you > fine folks could help me out. > > What I need is a couple/few URLs to files that are known to be served up on > a good running hi-speed line, and some download speeds that you get on your > good running hi-speed line (T1 or cable or whatever) when you transfer them. > I'd like to make some comparisons to what I'm getting on ours. These could > be either HTTP or allowed anonymous FTP. > > What I'm looking for are files around the 1 to 2 Meg size so that the > average download rate should be settled down by the time it reaches the end > of them. And preferably from a site that just hums right along. > > I've run a few tests so far, but I have no real way of knowing that any of > them are being served up at peak speed. > > I appreciate any help offered. > > Dave. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From baron at lava.net Mon Jan 8 16:49:39 2001 From: baron at lava.net (Baron Fujimoto) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k In-Reply-To: <200101081357260681.3D5934BE@mail.powersupply.net> Message-ID: On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, PowerNet wrote: : Actually, I think 9.0.0 is now available. : Has anyone tried this release? actually, it looks like 9.0.1 is out, but only [te]biv builds, which according to their matrix only supports tcpip and voip. depends what you need your boxes to do (haven't tried it -- we need modem support). ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From psc5 at powersupply.net Mon Jan 8 17:39:17 2001 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (PowerNet) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200101081839170261.3E5B44E1@mail.powersupply.net> We are using our boxes for dial-up access only and currently are only using Channelized T1's. We may soon be putting a few PRI's in the boxes. We are using tbixkh.m60 version 7.0.26 and are not really satisfied. Our major concern is modem support and stability. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 1/8/2001 at 12:49 PM Baron Fujimoto wrote: >On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, PowerNet wrote: > >: Actually, I think 9.0.0 is now available. >: Has anyone tried this release? > >actually, it looks like 9.0.1 is out, but only [te]biv builds, which >according to their matrix only supports tcpip and voip. depends what >you need your boxes to do (haven't tried it -- we need modem support). ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Edwin_Everett at cargill.com Mon Jan 8 22:42:15 2001 From: Edwin_Everett at cargill.com (Edwin_Everett@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k Message-ID: we tried it on a 6k and it crashed about 14 hours later....then about 16 hours after that...we backed off and are at 7.2.3 again Edwin_Everett@cargill.com -----Original Message----- From: baron@lava.net [mailto:baron@lava.net] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 4:50 PM To: psc5@powersupply.net Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: FW: Re: (ASCEND) Software for Max 6k On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, PowerNet wrote: : Actually, I think 9.0.0 is now available. : Has anyone tried this release? actually, it looks like 9.0.1 is out, but only [te]biv builds, which according to their matrix only supports tcpip and voip. depends what you need your boxes to do (haven't tried it -- we need modem support). ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Mon Jan 8 23:11:25 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) [OT] Checking Bandwidth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dave, The easiest way to see what kind of bandwidth you're getting/using, is to install MRTG and monitor your router's T1 port, ethernet port, or the ethernet port on your switch. This can be tricky, depending on what type of router it is. You can read about MRTG at http://www.mrtg.org. A bandwidth test won't really show you much useful information. I run those, and I get 30-80KB/s over an unloaded T1. I download a 200MB file from 3 hops away, and I average 140KB/s. A single connection will never max out a T1, you need to poll your router to see what you're actually using. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 They told me to think out of the box, but I tripped over it, now I own my own company. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dave Higgins ** Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:50 PM ** To: Ascend Users ** Subject: (ASCEND) [OT] Checking Bandwidth ** ** ** Hi there. ** ** All indicators so far point to a lack of true T1 bandwidth from our ** provider, but I'd like to run a couple more tests before I offer them ** "proof". We've been getting barraged with customer calls that ** moving around ** the 'net has been horrible the last few weeks. I'm wondering if ** any of you ** fine folks could help me out. ** ** What I need is a couple/few URLs to files that are known to be ** served up on ** a good running hi-speed line, and some download speeds that you ** get on your ** good running hi-speed line (T1 or cable or whatever) when you ** transfer them. ** I'd like to make some comparisons to what I'm getting on ours. ** These could ** be either HTTP or allowed anonymous FTP. ** ** What I'm looking for are files around the 1 to 2 Meg size so that the ** average download rate should be settled down by the time it ** reaches the end ** of them. And preferably from a site that just hums right along. ** ** I've run a few tests so far, but I have no real way of knowing ** that any of ** them are being served up at peak speed. ** ** I appreciate any help offered. ** ** Dave. ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From lk at uni2.dk Tue Jan 9 02:23:25 2001 From: lk at uni2.dk (Lars Knudsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) PAPfailure Message-ID: <005501c07a15$6fc9c550$0204e382@GUD> Greetings. I get this : 10 PAPcompare{plain}: auth='ascend' file='lortepassword'. 10 FAILURE -- PAPcompare failure 10 AuthLocal[localAuth] -> End-Of-Methods by FAILURE -- PAPcompare failure 20 route-1 login failed when authenticating route-1 What is PAPcompare and what can I do to solve it. Med venlig hilsen / Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lars Knudsen | DriftsTekniker | UNI2 | www.uni2.dk | 7730 1227 | Gl.Koge Landevej 55 | 2500 Valby lk@uni2.dk | gud@dulmens.dk | www.dulmens.dk | oso@techie.com| gud@juhuu.dk --> This message has been sent on 100% recycled electrons <-- --- __o- --- _-\<,_ Service der rykker --- (-)/ (-) ------------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From lk at uni2.dk Tue Jan 9 08:15:58 2001 From: lk at uni2.dk (Lars Knudsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Radius reinitializing Message-ID: <008a01c07a46$b0358210$0204e382@GUD> RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. Why ? Config : (TNT) -------------------- admin> read external EXTERNAL-AUTH read admin> list [in EXTERNAL-AUTH] auth-type = RADIUS acct-type = none rad-id-space = unified rad-id-source-unique = system-unique rad-serv-enable = no rad-auth-client = { 130.227.247.151 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1745 0 pip no 5 no no no 0 + rad-acct-client = { 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 "" 1 0 acct-base-10 0 0 yes 0 n+ rad-auth-server = { 0 no rad-serv-attr-any [ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.+ tac-auth-client = { 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 "" 0 } tacplus-auth-client = { 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 "" 0 0 } tacplus-acct-client = { 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 "" } local-profiles-first = lpf-no noattr6-use-termsrv = yes admin> list rad-auth-client [in EXTERNAL-AUTH:rad-auth-client] auth-server-1 = 130.227.247.151 auth-server-2 = 0.0.0.0 auth-server-3 = 0.0.0.0 auth-port = 1745 auth-src-port = 0 auth-key = xxx auth-pool = no auth-timeout = 5 auth-rsp-required = no auth-id-fail-return-busy = no auth-id-timeout-return-busy = no auth-sess-interval = 0 auth-TS-secure = yes auth-Send67 = yes auth-frm-adr-start = no auth-boot-host = 0.0.0.0 auth-boot-host-2 = 0.0.0.0 auth-boot-port = 0 auth-reset-time = 0 auth-id-max-retry-time = 0 auth-radius-compat = old-ascend auth-keep-user-name = keep-name auth-realm-delimiters = /\@% id-auth-prefix = "" -------------------- Med venlig hilsen / Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lars Knudsen | DriftsTekniker | UNI2 | www.uni2.dk | 7730 1227 | Gl.Koge Landevej 55 | 2500 Valby lk@uni2.dk | gud@dulmens.dk | www.dulmens.dk | oso@techie.com| gud@juhuu.dk --> This message has been sent on 100% recycled electrons <-- --- __o- --- _-\<,_ Service der rykker --- (-)/ (-) ------------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Tue Jan 9 09:14:13 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) PAPfailure References: <005501c07a15$6fc9c550$0204e382@GUD> Message-ID: <3A5B2AC5.6080704@lucentradius.com> Lars Knudsen wrote: > Greetings. > > I get this : > > 10 PAPcompare{plain}: auth='ascend' file='lortepassword'. > 10 FAILURE -- PAPcompare failure > 10 AuthLocal[localAuth] -> End-Of-Methods by FAILURE -- PAPcompare failure > 20 route-1 login failed > > when authenticating route-1 > > What is PAPcompare and what can I do to solve it. The client is sending the password ascend and in the user's record you have the password lortepassword. They don't match so the Access-Request is being rejected. PAP = Password Authentication Protocol Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From jcdutton at lucent.com Tue Jan 9 14:37:33 2001 From: jcdutton at lucent.com (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Radius reinitializing References: <008a01c07a46$b0358210$0204e382@GUD> Message-ID: <004601c07a7c$0144e6c0$1401a8c0@home> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Knudsen" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:15 PM Subject: (ASCEND) Radius reinitializing > RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. > RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. > RADIF: radiusAcctReinit: reinitializing. > > Why ? > admin> list rad-auth-client > [in EXTERNAL-AUTH:rad-auth-client] > auth-server-1 = 130.227.247.151 > auth-server-2 = 0.0.0.0 > auth-server-3 = 0.0.0.0 > auth-port = 1745 Interesting port number, are you sure the Radius server is listening on this ? Auth/Acct Standard: 1812/1813 Old commonly used: 1645/1646 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From argon at argontech.net Tue Jan 9 19:43:54 2001 From: argon at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000 LMODEM: shared memory error. Message-ID: <01df01c07aa6$ca2bc5c0$1f38f4d0@argontech.net> Can anyone here help the max stupid?? I've got an Ascend 6096 that has started giving me some strange login (radius authentication) errors. Suddenly users at the end of a long authentication list will not be authenticated. I reboot the ascend box, and everything is fine. I'm getting an error message in the Debug window of: LMODEM: Shared memory failure -- Byte at 7E00000 was 00(00), expected 07 16MB shared memory found in system I'm assuming this means that the main system memory has some bad bits?? If so, whats the fix? If not, what does it mean? I've looked at the Lucent site and found it completely useless. Docs didn't give an error message list either. Thanks <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ascend at xetron.com Wed Jan 10 09:30:00 2001 From: ascend at xetron.com (Dave Alverson) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max1800 BRI - modem retrains a lot Message-ID: We have a Max1800 (MX-SL-12MOD-S56) that we want to use for dialup access. We bought it over 2 years ago and just recently got it talking to our Fujitsu PBX over the BRI interface. When dialing into it from a Supra 288 external modem, I see the RT (retrain) indication on the Supra frequently. The retrain usually take 20-40 seconds and then the connection may be OK for anywhere from 15 to 100 seconds. Calling from a different modem (internal, no display to see whats going on) there are long pauses which could be retraining also. The Max is running fbk.m18 version 7.2.3. ATI3 to the modem says V2.098-K56_DLP_CSM ATI6 says RC56DPF L8565A Rev 47.22/47.22 Would a new version of software help any? Are there any setting on the Ascend that might cause this? Dave Alverson (davea at xetron . com) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Edwin_Everett at cargill.com Wed Jan 10 12:15:49 2001 From: Edwin_Everett at cargill.com (Edwin_Everett@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Modem Pooling for outbound? Anybody? Message-ID: Looking for a product that can take the place of Intragy Deskdial. Win 2000 will not be supported and so I need an alternative program to perform "port redirection" to the max. Anybody out there looking at any good leads? Thanks Edwin_Everett@cargill.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From romans129 at juno.com Wed Jan 10 23:22:34 2001 From: romans129 at juno.com (DONNA J JACKSON) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:59:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <20010110.212235.-760255.0.romans129@juno.com> DO YOU SELL POOL ADDRESSES IN CALIFORNIA BY ZIPE CODE ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cclements at cp-tel.net Thu Jan 11 12:41:38 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Indications of a defective modem card? Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010111123242.00a2bae0@cp-tel.net> Ladies and Gentlemen, I have a Max 6000 that exhibits the following behavior. First when a call comes in the trunk status shows the "r" message. The call never completes, yet the "r" likewise, never clears. It remains until the trunk line is disabled and re-enabled. Next when I enter the slot configuration (this is a v.90 24 modem card) Some of the modems show N/A rather than the "enable modem". This cannot be changed. Line 2 seems to answer and complete calls fine. Any ideas? Chris Clements ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ahakim at link.net Thu Jan 11 03:17:18 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmed El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] SuperPipe155 Message-ID: All, Does anyone has a way to make the superpipe operate on 256K speed using the 2 BRI interfaces on the box Ahmed From dlganger at earthlink.net Thu Jan 11 14:18:26 2001 From: dlganger at earthlink.net (Devin L. Ganger) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Where to sell B-STDX 9000 frame switch? Message-ID: <20010111121826.A21650@earthlink.net> I'm trying to help a former employer sell off a used B-STDX 9000 frame switch. Can anyone suggest a good venue to do so, or any reliable companies that deal in used telco hardware? Thanks in advance. -- Devin L. Ganger Usenet is not a right. It is a right, a left, a jab, and a sharp uppercut to the jaw. The postman hits! You have new mail." - Ed Vielmetti & Chip Salzenberg * If replying, please either send an email OR post it here, not both. * From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Thu Jan 11 14:28:04 2001 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] FOR SALE ASCEND Message-ID: <01ff01c07c0d$004c66c0$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> Attention Ascend users: We have a large lot of Ascend Max 4048's on their way to us. These units are available for sale as whole units or just spare cards. MAX4048 w/ (3) MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards OR Spare MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards Units will be Cleaned, Tested, All Passwords Erased, and Packaged in New boxes for shipment. We accept VISA, Mastercard, AMEX......or COD. Please call me or any of my staff directly or email me offline if you have any interest. Regards, Scott Woodland Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010111/ad4879c0/attachment.html From flaboy at fdt.net Thu Jan 11 14:46:36 2001 From: flaboy at fdt.net (Joe Barnhart) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) superpipe 95 Message-ID: I'm hoping someone here has a contact for this type of device. I'm looking to purchase a couple of them. Thx, Joe ------------------------- Joseph Barnhart Florida Digital Turnpike Network Administrator http://www.fdt.net ------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From erdmann at itc.nl Thu Jan 11 07:28:56 2001 From: erdmann at itc.nl (Michel Erdmann) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Win2k IAS Message-ID: Anyone using Windows 2000 AD (IAS) as the Radius authentication source for their Max? How about the Ascend- specific attributes? Regards, Michel Erdmann ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tarikk at intrakets.com.tr Fri Jan 12 03:59:28 2001 From: tarikk at intrakets.com.tr (tarik kucuk) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) BSTDX HSSI card- asymmetric Message-ID: <3A5ED580.FE032F2@intrakets.com.tr> Hi, Does anyone know if BSTDX HSSI card allows asymmetric (16 MB downstream/4 MB upstream) satellite connection? tarik. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sjenkins at unlimited.com Fri Jan 12 05:44:03 2001 From: sjenkins at unlimited.com (Seb Jenkins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) iSDN for Max 200 Plus Message-ID: Hi, I found your email address on the web. I am a user of an Ascend Max200 Plus and need to purchase another iSDN PCMCIA card for it. The existing iSDN card in it is Ascend branded - model no. M200-SL-BRIS. Part no. 0800-0409-001 Can you advise where I might be able to get hold of one of these now ? Many thanks. Seb Jenkins ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tim at futuresouth.com Sat Jan 13 17:36:26 2001 From: tim at futuresouth.com (Tim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT Message-ID: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> Is there something special I need to do to make routes from the dial-up pool and static routes from RADIUS advertised via OSPF? We are running 7.2.x. I can see the OSPF neighbors and it is picking up routes from other routers fine but it doesn't seem to be advertising any routes. We have a single backbone area so one would think it should be straightforward. I put in static routes in our Cisco router right now but it's been pretty aggravating. Some of the settings follow: new ospf-area-range set area-network-addr = 192.168.58.9/26 set area-network-mask = 255.255.255.192 set advertize = yes new ip-global set pool-summary = yes set pool-ospf-adv-type = type-1 set ospf-pref = 10 set ospf-ase-pref = 150 set ospf-global as-boundary-router = no new ip-interface set interface-address physical-address shelf = shelf-1 set interface-address physical-address slot = slot-3 set interface-address physical-address item-number = 1 set ospf active = yes set ospf area = 0.0.0.0 set ospf area-type = normal set ospf ase-type = type-1 Thanks! Tim ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From drcrow at nkn.net Mon Jan 15 08:42:45 2001 From: drcrow at nkn.net (drcrow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <000501c07f01$6ca4ac00$462f7980@verio.net> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From isaac at state.net Mon Jan 15 11:27:02 2001 From: isaac at state.net (Isaac Hopkins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How can I see how long a user has been connected Message-ID: <3A6332E6.CE28EAFA@state.net> I have a max 4004 with 1 T1 PRI and I want to see how long a user has been connected and or idle time. Is this possible? If so how do I go about doing this, is their some management software I should purchase or is their a better or a builtin way? Please respond via email ie not through the list, as I am not on the list Thank You Isaac Hopkins From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Tue Jan 16 00:44:21 2001 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX4048 Message-ID: <00ab01c07f87$c25903e0$0300000a@msg> I have 3 Ascend Max4048's for sale. Each unit has (3) MX-SL-16MOD-S56 cards in them. $4200 each OR $4000 per unit if you take all 3 of them. COD, VISA, MC, AMEX PLEASE RESPOND OFFLINE to scott@millenniumsolutions.net Regards, Scott Woodland Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Phone: 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext. 230 Fax: 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net From budnew at hotmail.com Tue Jan 16 06:21:35 2001 From: budnew at hotmail.com (New Bud) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Looking for MAX 4000 E1 Message-ID: Geetings all, Does anybody have for sale working E1 4000 (with or without modems)? The box should have R2 support, the rest does not matter. Regards, Ivo budnew@hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From jimryland at myrealbox.com Wed Jan 17 12:32:41 2001 From: jimryland at myrealbox.com (jimryland@myrealbox.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) If You've Ever Considered Switching From Cable... Message-ID: <0w6j2l1ln88ulsq86h.akcaji23f0ti@76874ubp.billy> If you've ever considered switching from cable to satellite NOW is the time! Satellite Television Is Out Of This World!!! > Affordable - No equipment to purchase or lease. > Digital - Picture is crystal clear with CD quality sound. > More Channels & Movies - all your favorite channels + pay per view movies. If you subscribe NOW, you'll get: > Free Delivery! > Free Installation! > Free In Home Service! > FREE HBO, STARZ, CINEMAX, SHOWTIME for 3 months! > You may get Local Channels NOW! The time to switch from cable to satellite is NOW! Choose Your Program Package: > AMERICA'S TOP 100 - OUR PREMIUM PACKAGE - $34.99 > AMERICA'S TOP 150 - OUR BEST PACKAGE - $44.99 AMERICA'S TOP 100 Programming Package includes: Sports - ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN Classic, ESPN News, Empire, Outdoor Life Network, Sunshine, Madison Square Garden, Speed Vision, Home Team Sports, TV Games Fox Sports Channels - Arizona, Bay Area, Chicago, Cincinnati, Detroit, Midwest, Florida, New England, New York, Ohio, Pittsburgh, Rocky Mountain, North West, West, South, South West, Midwest Sports, Altenative1, Altenative3 News - CNN, CNN Headline News, All-News Network, Bloomberg, NASA, C-Span, C-Span 2, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN FN, CNN International, Court TV Family/Kids - The Cartoon Network, The Disney Channel, The Disney Toon Channel, Nickelodeon, Noggin, Pax, PBS You, Angel One, TV Land, Good Samaritan Network, The Fox Family Channel, Trinity Broadcast Network, External Word Television Network Learning - Discovery Channel, Discovery Health Channel, The Learning Channel, History Channel, Food Network, Travel, E!, Animal Planet, America's Voice, HGTV, Free Speech, Link Media, Tech TV, DELLL, Research Variety - A&E, BET, ZDTV, Home Shopping, WGN, QVC, TNN, Weather Channel, TNT, USA, Bravo, Comedy Central, Game Show, FX, Sci-Fi Channel, TV Land, AMC, TCM, LMN, Lifetime, Romance Classics/Independant Film Channel, BBC, ValueVision Foreign - Univision, Galavision, HITN Music - MTV, VH1, MTV 2, Country Music Television AND Over 30 Music Channels! Receive A FREE 3 Day 2 Night Vacation for 2 for the First 1,000 New Customers! Choose from 20 destinations: Las Vegas, NV -- Laughlin, NV -- Reno, NV -- Lake Tahoe, NV -- Atlantic City, NJ Honolulu, HI -- Daytona Beach, FL -- Orlando, FL -- Myrtle Beach, SC Anaheim, CA - (Disneyland Area) -- Palm Springs, CA -- New Orleans, LA Gatlinburg, TN -- San Antonio, TX -- White Mountain, NH -- Pocono Mountains, PA Branson, MO -- Puerto Vallarta, MX -- Cancun, MX -- Mazatlan, MX TOTAL VALUE is Over $700 and you get all of this for FREE! __________________________________________ Restrictions: 1. Continental U.S. ONLY 2. Available ONLY to NEW Customers 3. Must have a Credit Card This is a 72 hr Give Away, First Come First Serve Basis. REMEMBER, this incredible OFFER is only available while supplies Last! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For your FREE Satellite System & FREE 3 Day 2 Night Vacation for 2! Call 1-800-405-6847 Live Operators Standing By 24 Hours A Day! Mention Code: 103 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ricardo.gomez-rey at co.unisys.com Thu Jan 18 15:11:51 2001 From: ricardo.gomez-rey at co.unisys.com (Gomez-Rey, Ricardo A) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Navis Message-ID: <838E5B4DEBFED21189E100105A209DB2021CA6ED@co-bog-exch-1.pl.unisys.com> Hi, i have a question, i have a Ace server in Sun but the navis radius version 1.3a is in the NT, is compatible??? and the second question is.. how configure these mixed?? Ricardo Gomez Unisys de Colombia From ricardo.gomez-rey at co.unisys.com Thu Jan 18 14:48:40 2001 From: ricardo.gomez-rey at co.unisys.com (Gomez-Rey, Ricardo A) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Navis Message-ID: <838E5B4DEBFED21189E100105A209DB2021CA6EC@co-bog-exch-1.pl.unisys.com> Hi, i have a question, i have a Ace server in Sun but the navis radius version 1.3a is in the NT, is compatible??? and the second question is.. how configure these mixed?? Ricardo Gomez Unisys de Colombia ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Fri Jan 19 10:09:44 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Navis References: <838E5B4DEBFED21189E100105A209DB2021CA6EC@co-bog-exch-1.pl.unisys.com> Message-ID: <3A6866C8.C074AB95@lucentradius.com> "Gomez-Rey, Ricardo A" wrote: > > Hi, i have a question, i have a Ace server in Sun but the navis radius > version 1.3a is in the NT, is compatible??? and the second question is.. how > configure these mixed?? Yes, The server it talks to is determined by the sdconf.rec file. -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ascendlist at mcb.net Fri Jan 19 11:02:42 2001 From: ascendlist at mcb.net (Ascend Users) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 4000 cooling fans Message-ID: Hello All, we have a MAX 4000 (MX-SL-16MOD-S56) which has a cooling fan that is starting to develop noise, it sounds like a bearing or similar starting to fail. My question is - can anyone suggest how to remove the top cover or an easy way to replace the fans? All the screws and fixings appear to be contained within the unit and are not easy to get at, probably requires a special tool of some sort. Thank you D Thornley MANNET ISP Isle of Man British Isles -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Jan 19 12:42:58 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:00 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) IPSec hash codes and Pipeline 130 Message-ID: Does anyone know how one goes about getting an IPSec hash code for a Pipeline 130 these days? It used to be that you'd simply enter the serial number at http://www.ascend.com/firewallforfree and they'd send you the hash code. Later, they decided that the P130 is too slow to do IPSec and firewall, so you'd get a hash code that did one or the other, but not both. Anyone using IPSec on a Pipeline 130? Any comments or caveats? -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From skipmax at seacove.net Fri Jan 19 14:20:28 2001 From: skipmax at seacove.net (Dennis Duval) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 cooling fans References: Message-ID: <003f01c08255$442e7420$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> > > All the screws and fixings appear to be contained within the unit and are > not easy to get at, probably requires a special tool of some sort. > Lucent has the only existing tool for removing screws from inside a closed box but they will gladly do it for you for only $10,000 :). If I remember correctly, remove all the screws from each side of the unit, including a screw from each side of the front panel, then pop the front panel off. I can't remember if there are more screws under the cover, but I think the black cover has to be slid towards the front and then lifted up. These may not be exactly the correct instructions, so please don't blame me if you tear it up. Those fans are non-standard and a little difficult to find. I believe I had to order a minimum of 10 fans at about $9 each. The originals I replaced were Sunon KDE2406PHB2 and replaced them with an Elina KDB240615MB. I just can't find a record of where I ordered them from. I replaced all three fans at once as a preventative measure. The wire leads on the fans will have to be cut and soldered. Dennis Duval ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From pwthoma at anc.net Fri Jan 19 13:58:57 2001 From: pwthoma at anc.net (Paul Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 cooling fans Message-ID: <5.0.1.4.2.20010119135839.03213980@mail.anc.net> That model number is for one of the 16 port 56k modem cards. Max model numbers are typically like MXHP-2T1-48NA (4048 for example). Anyway, here is what you need to do. Remove all the screws from the sides of the max including the ears and the longer screw holding the front panel on. Pop off the front panel. The top will lift off from the bottom with a little effort. The fans just screw onto the bottom of the case. You will need to solder (spelling is probably wrong) the wires for a good connection as there aren't any clips. If you call the fan manufacturer, they will tell you where you can buy the fans at or try http://www.indek.com/ Paul At 11:02 AM 1/19/2001, you wrote: >Hello All, > >we have a MAX 4000 (MX-SL-16MOD-S56) which has a cooling fan that is >starting to develop noise, it sounds like a bearing or similar starting to >fail. My question is - can anyone suggest how to remove the top cover or >an easy way to replace the fans? > >All the screws and fixings appear to be contained within the unit and are >not easy to get at, probably requires a special tool of some sort. > >Thank you > >D Thornley > >MANNET ISP >Isle of Man >British Isles > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >To get FAQ'd: > > > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Sat Jan 20 10:07:55 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 cooling fans In-Reply-To: <200101200645.WAA14771@max.bungi.com> References: <200101200645.WAA14771@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Ascend Users > >we have a MAX 4000 (MX-SL-16MOD-S56) which has a cooling fan that is >starting to develop noise, it sounds like a bearing or similar starting to >fail. My question is - can anyone suggest how to remove the top cover or >an easy way to replace the fans? http://www.esight.com/ has detailed instructions, with pretty pictures and everything. The tech note is titled "Removing the cover of a Max 4000 unit". While you're in there, replace all the fans. They fail. You might notice that some aren't spinning as it is. Blowing out the dust, prayer, and incense will help too. Be very careful with the front panel LEDs; they're on inch-long leads and it's really easy to flatten them. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From jyrki.kainulainen at datatie.fi Sun Jan 21 13:51:51 2001 From: jyrki.kainulainen at datatie.fi (Jyrki Kainulainen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX TNT how to see the IP packet (packet dump...) Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010121213653.00a02410@mail.datatie.fi> Hello. I need to test some generic filter in TNT, but I'm not sure about those offsets and other parameters. I know what they mean and so, but I need to "see" the packet like TNT sees it. How can I see the packet as it is evaluated by filters? The packet I'm interestin is UDP port 139 and it's coming from OC3-ATM and going to ISDN E1. I tried wandisplay at ATM card, but I think I see some ATM stuff there, and filters doesn't? BTW, is there any documentations about those commands what you get when you type "help" on command line. Only thing I know is to use "? command_name" but it's not very informativ message you get there ;-) And one note: version 8.0.2 didn't work correctly when I tried to change radius server status via SNMP. For some unknown reason, only the authentication was "reseted" to primary server but accounting wasn't. After I upgrade 8.0.4 and tried just the same scripts, it worked fine :-). Regards, Jyrki Kainulainen. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Sun Jan 21 17:10:56 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) IPSec hash codes and Pipeline 130 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010122101056.00cf4c60@mail.ascend.com.au> At 10:42 AM 1/19/01 -0800, Peter Lalor wrote: >Does anyone know how one goes about getting an IPSec hash code for a >Pipeline 130 these days? It used to be that you'd simply enter the >serial number at http://www.ascend.com/firewallforfree and they'd >send you the hash code. > >Later, they decided that the P130 is too slow to do IPSec and >firewall, so you'd get a hash code that did one or the other, but not >both. > >Anyone using IPSec on a Pipeline 130? Any comments or caveats? I think you hit the nail on the head with the analysis about the P130. You would be better suited with another super/pipeline product for IPSec. I think the principle issue is that if you say the P130 can do IPSec, and that it has a T1/E1 interface, people would do IPSec at T1/E1 rate. The P130 was designed in an era where point-to-point encryption was not required for SO/HO applications. I believe that several of the Superpipes and Pipelines still have Firewall/IPSec capability up to 56bit for free, and 3Des at a small cost. In the sales documents there is no mention of P130 and IPSec. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Sun Jan 21 19:41:49 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) IPSec hash codes and Pipeline 130 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010122101056.00cf4c60@mail.ascend.com.au> References: <3.0.5.32.20010122101056.00cf4c60@mail.ascend.com.au> Message-ID: >At 10:42 AM 1/19/01 -0800, Peter Lalor wrote: >>Does anyone know how one goes about getting an IPSec hash code for a >>Pipeline 130 these days? It used to be that you'd simply enter the >>serial number at http://www.ascend.com/firewallforfree and they'd >>send you the hash code. >> >>Later, they decided that the P130 is too slow to do IPSec and >>firewall, so you'd get a hash code that did one or the other, but not >>both. >> > >Anyone using IPSec on a Pipeline 130? Any comments or caveats? > > I think you hit the nail on the head with the analysis about > the P130. You would be better suited with another super/pipeline > product for IPSec. I'm sure. But when a customer already has existing equipment that can do it for free. they're going to want to try it out. I've warned them. > I think the principle issue is that if you say the P130 can do > IPSec, and that it has a T1/E1 interface, people would do IPSec > at T1/E1 rate. People! ;-) > I believe that several of the Superpipes and Pipelines still have > Firewall/IPSec capability up to 56bit for free, and 3Des at > a small cost. http://www.lucent-info.com/ins/firewallforfree/ was pointed out to me off-list. > In the sales documents there is no mention of P130 and IPSec. The Pipeline 130 datasheet at http://www.lucent.com/ins/library/pdf/datasheets/p130ds.pdf avoids mentioning IPSec, but talks all about it's 'Secure Connect Firewall VPN' capabilities. Various documents on eSight cover configuring IPSec on the Pipe 130 explicitly. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Sun Jan 21 20:35:28 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) IPSec hash codes and Pipeline 130 In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20010122101056.00cf4c60@mail.ascend.com.au> <3.0.5.32.20010122101056.00cf4c60@mail.ascend.com.au> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010122133528.00b88710@mail.ascend.com.au> >People! ;-) > >> I believe that several of the Superpipes and Pipelines still have >> Firewall/IPSec capability up to 56bit for free, and 3Des at >> a small cost. > >http://www.lucent-info.com/ins/firewallforfree/ was pointed out to me off-list. > >> In the sales documents there is no mention of P130 and IPSec. > >The Pipeline 130 datasheet at >http://www.lucent.com/ins/library/pdf/datasheets/p130ds.pdf avoids >mentioning IPSec, but talks all about it's 'Secure Connect Firewall >VPN' capabilities. Various documents on eSight cover configuring >IPSec on the Pipe 130 explicitly. Contact your reseller. From what I can determine, the IPSec support for P130 is no longer being sold, whereas it is for every other current model of pipeline/SuperPipe. It's not much simpler than that. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From jvenegas at adexus.cl Mon Jan 22 06:13:17 2001 From: jvenegas at adexus.cl (Jorge Venegas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX Syncronous Message-ID: <032569DC.004322FE.00@domino.adexus.cl> Hi my name is George I need to know if any MAX or card support communicaction with syncronous modem Regards ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Mon Jan 22 12:16:22 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT how to see the IP packet (packet dump...) In-Reply-To: <200101220645.WAA23434@max.bungi.com> References: <200101220645.WAA23434@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Jyrki Kainulainen" > >I need to test some generic filter in TNT, but I'm not sure about those >offsets and other parameters. I know what they mean and so, but I need to >"see" the packet like TNT sees it. > >How can I see the packet as it is evaluated by filters? The packet I'm >interestin is UDP port 139 and it's coming from OC3-ATM and going to ISDN >E1. I tried wandisplay at ATM card, but I think I see some ATM stuff there, >and filters doesn't? You don't mention what the filter does, but if it's a UDP packet does it really have to be a generic filter? Why not use an IP filter? >BTW, is there any documentations about those commands what you get when you >type "help" on command line. Only thing I know is to use "? command_name" >but it's not very informativ message you get there ;-) The online help is pretty limited. PDF docs for 8.x are available on eSight. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at millenniumsolutions.net Mon Jan 22 18:09:55 2001 From: scott at millenniumsolutions.net (Scott Woodland) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] WTB: Pipeline 130 Message-ID: <03f201c084d0$d13a5960$d3fea8c0@new2u.net> Hello all, I am looking to purchase a couple of Ascend Pipeline 130's...in particular P130-UBRI-FT1 Please contact me directly if you have any available for sale. Regards, Scott Woodland scott@millenniumsolutions.net Millennium Solutions Group, Inc. 575 Menlo Drive, Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Ph. 888-801-2001 or 916-630-2001 Ext.230 Fax 916-630-2000 www.millenniumsolutions.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010122/6871a563/attachment.htm From cclements at cp-tel.net Mon Jan 22 10:36:26 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] avm reports Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010122103607.00a2e220@cp-tel.net> Can anyone tell me quickly how to generate avm reports that show how many bad calls there were and on what ports? Chris Clements From cclements at cp-tel.net Mon Jan 22 10:20:20 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) avm reports Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010122100730.00a2e130@cp-tel.net> Can anyone tell me quickly how to generate avm reports that show how many bad calls there were and on what ports? Chris Clements ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From f.lovergine at iesi.ba.cnr.it Tue Jan 23 04:31:56 2001 From: f.lovergine at iesi.ba.cnr.it (Francesco Lovergine) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Is there a preferred service/host in TAOS? Message-ID: <20010123113156.A28033@iesi.ba.cnr.it> Hello there As you know (maybe) Lucent Portmaster series is at its deadline. We use extensively a nice feature of ComOS and we need to know in advance if it is supported on Lucent MAX boxes. Is there the possibility to pre-define a default/preferred host and service (tcp port) to open 'netdata' - this is the PM definition - session with it? With PM whenever a call arrives and a user logons with a specific name/password the box open a tcp session on port X with host Y in pass-through mode (i.e. without translation or interpretation of any character - this is different from a telnet sessions which capture some specific control chars such as Ctrl-]). This nice feature is used in our private network to build up custom client/server applications with some mbedded systems with limited capacities - which cannot open a ppp session and then connect the suitable host. thank you for any hints -- Francesco P. Lovergine ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From os at landshut.org Tue Jan 23 06:03:29 2001 From: os at landshut.org (Oliver Stettner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT References: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> Message-ID: <3A6D7311.AF70FB59@landshut.org> Tim wrote: > Is there something special I need to do to make routes from the dial-up > pool and static routes from RADIUS advertised via OSPF? We are running > 7.2.x. I can see the OSPF neighbors and it is picking up routes from > other routers fine but it doesn't seem to be advertising any routes. We > have a single backbone area so one would think it should be > straightforward. I put in static routes in our Cisco router right now > but it's been pretty aggravating. Some of the settings follow: > > new ospf-area-range > set area-network-addr = 192.168.58.9/26 > set area-network-mask = 255.255.255.192 > set advertize = yes > > new ip-global > set pool-summary = yes > set pool-ospf-adv-type = type-1 > set ospf-pref = 10 > set ospf-ase-pref = 150 > set ospf-global as-boundary-router = no > > new ip-interface > set interface-address physical-address shelf = shelf-1 > set interface-address physical-address slot = slot-3 > set interface-address physical-address item-number = 1 > set ospf active = yes > set ospf area = 0.0.0.0 > set ospf area-type = normal > set ospf ase-type = type-1 We have exactly the same problem and have no idea so far. :-( Did anybody successfully configure OSPF between a Lucent TNT and a Cisco Network? Regards, -- Oliver Stettner | mailto:os@landshut.org Laendgasse 120 | http://www.landshut.org/members/os/ D-84028 Landshut | ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ralf.manhalter at wuerttembergische.de Tue Jan 23 07:57:52 2001 From: ralf.manhalter at wuerttembergische.de (Ralf Manhalter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:01 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT References: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> <3A6D7311.AF70FB59@landshut.org> Message-ID: <3A6D8DE0.4FA9E7F3@wuerttembergische.de> hello, we have running ospf between cisco 75xx and max tnt. i think the problems you have based on ip-interface. see the following config: new IP-INTERFACE set interface-address physical-address shelf = shelf-1 set interface-address physical-address slot = slot-9 set interface-address physical-address item-number = 4 set interface-address logical-item = 0 set ip-address = x.x.x.x/30 set netmask = 255.255.255.252 set proxy-mode = Off set rip-mode = routing-off set route-filter = "" set rip2-use-multicast = yes set ospf active = yes set ospf area = 0.0.0.110 <---------------- this is our ospfarea for the ciscos and the max set ospf area-type = normal set ospf hello-interval = 10 set ospf dead-interval = 40 set ospf priority = 6 set ospf authen-type = simple <---------------- set ospf auth-key = test <--------------------- this is the ospfpassword for the area, also for the cisco too. without the pw it doesn't run at our lan. set ospf key-id = 0 set ospf cost = 1 set ospf down-cost = 16777215 set ospf ase-type = type-1 set ospf ase-tag = c0:00:00:00 set ospf transit-delay = 1 set ospf retransmit-interval = 5 set ospf non-multicast = no set multicast-allowed = no set multicast-rate-limit = 100 set multicast-group-leave-delay = 0 set directed-broadcast-allowed = yes set vrouter = "" set management-only-interface = no write -f this config runs with two 75xx and four max tnt successfully. with greetings ralf Oliver Stettner wrote: > Tim wrote: > > > Is there something special I need to do to make routes from the dial-up > > pool and static routes from RADIUS advertised via OSPF? We are running > > 7.2.x. I can see the OSPF neighbors and it is picking up routes from > > other routers fine but it doesn't seem to be advertising any routes. We > > have a single backbone area so one would think it should be > > straightforward. I put in static routes in our Cisco router right now > > but it's been pretty aggravating. Some of the settings follow: > > > > new ospf-area-range > > set area-network-addr = 192.168.58.9/26 > > set area-network-mask = 255.255.255.192 > > set advertize = yes > > > > new ip-global > > set pool-summary = yes > > set pool-ospf-adv-type = type-1 > > set ospf-pref = 10 > > set ospf-ase-pref = 150 > > set ospf-global as-boundary-router = no > > > > new ip-interface > > set interface-address physical-address shelf = shelf-1 > > set interface-address physical-address slot = slot-3 > > set interface-address physical-address item-number = 1 > > set ospf active = yes > > set ospf area = 0.0.0.0 > > set ospf area-type = normal > > set ospf ase-type = type-1 > > We have exactly the same problem and have no idea so far. :-( Did > anybody successfully configure OSPF between a Lucent TNT and a Cisco > Network? > > Regards, > -- > Oliver Stettner | mailto:os@landshut.org > Laendgasse 120 | http://www.landshut.org/members/os/ > D-84028 Landshut | > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From sp at iphh.net Tue Jan 23 08:30:59 2001 From: sp at iphh.net (Sascha E. Pollok) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT In-Reply-To: <3A6D7311.AF70FB59@landshut.org> References: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> Message-ID: You both, have you tried setting the ospf-adv-types to type-2 ? Was just an idea... let me know if this helps! Regards, Sascha >> Is there something special I need to do to make routes from the dial-up >> pool and static routes from RADIUS advertised via OSPF? We are running >> 7.2.x. I can see the OSPF neighbors and it is picking up routes from >> other routers fine but it doesn't seem to be advertising any routes. We >> have a single backbone area so one would think it should be >> straightforward. I put in static routes in our Cisco router right now >> but it's been pretty aggravating. Some of the settings follow: >> >> new ospf-area-range >> set area-network-addr = 192.168.58.9/26 >> set area-network-mask = 255.255.255.192 >> set advertize = yes >> >> new ip-global >> set pool-summary = yes >> set pool-ospf-adv-type = type-1 >> set ospf-pref = 10 >> set ospf-ase-pref = 150 >> set ospf-global as-boundary-router = no >> >> new ip-interface >> set interface-address physical-address shelf = shelf-1 >> set interface-address physical-address slot = slot-3 >> set interface-address physical-address item-number = 1 >> set ospf active = yes >> set ospf area = 0.0.0.0 >> set ospf area-type = normal >> set ospf ase-type = type-1 --- Sascha E. Pollok Internet Port Hamburg Technical Manager / Network Operations Grosse Reichenstrasse 27 D-20457 Hamburg Germany Tel.?? +49 (0)40 37 49 19-0 Fax??? +49 (0)40 37 49 19-29 Email: sp@iphh.net ICQ #38955239 You spamma my mailbox I nukea da ass ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tom at ytram.com Tue Jan 23 10:52:40 2001 From: tom at ytram.com (Tom Allebrandi) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FAQ availability? Message-ID: <000001c0855c$e6ff9990$5500a8c0@tom> Hi! At the end of each message on the mailing list I see the following: > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: When I try to access the FAQ link, I get a 404 error - File not found. I've tried it from the office, I've tried it from home. I've tried it from WIndows 98, I've tried it from Windows NT. The only thing I haven't tried it on is something other than IE 5.5. Is the problem my browser? Or, is the FAQ off line? Thanks! --- Tom Tom Allebrandi tom@ytram.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From rafal at inet.pl Tue Jan 23 13:05:28 2001 From: rafal at inet.pl (Rafal Szmidt) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax Message-ID: <3A6DD5F8.479962C2@inet.pl> Hi all, I have encountered very strange behavior of one of my SDSL links, namely very stable and good copper line to my customer ( 600 ohms - running 768 kbs) with good noise and attenuation figures started to be very unstable - by simply floating. I had Pipeline connecting for 10 sec and disconnecting again.. I run extensive line tests, exchange some copper between me and CO and finally I went to customer to check the modem. Modem is OK - I run test with modem connected in my operations center - perfect, stable connection. After all it looks like some other similar signal is interrupting the transmission frequently causing Pipeline to go Up and Down. But how I can trace this signal ? From my experience I know that ISDN on the same copper or close can do this. I ask my telco to measure the line again but form their perspective everything is fine. Noise figures are the same as before, impedance and isolation readings are excellent, but modem is not running. How can I isolate the problem ? regards rafal szmidt ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Matt_Brunsvold at cargill.com Tue Jan 23 15:05:14 2001 From: Matt_Brunsvold at cargill.com (Matt_Brunsvold@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax Message-ID: Is there any type of new lighting fixture or dimmer switch being used nearby? It has been my experience on a few occasions to see this type of interference knock out a DSL connection. -----Original Message----- From: rafal@inet.pl [mailto:rafal@inet.pl] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:05 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: FW: (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax Hi all, I have encountered very strange behavior of one of my SDSL links, namely very stable and good copper line to my customer ( 600 ohms - running 768 kbs) with good noise and attenuation figures started to be very unstable - by simply floating. I had Pipeline connecting for 10 sec and disconnecting again.. I run extensive line tests, exchange some copper between me and CO and finally I went to customer to check the modem. Modem is OK - I run test with modem connected in my operations center - perfect, stable connection. After all it looks like some other similar signal is interrupting the transmission frequently causing Pipeline to go Up and Down. But how I can trace this signal ? From my experience I know that ISDN on the same copper or close can do this. I ask my telco to measure the line again but form their perspective everything is fine. Noise figures are the same as before, impedance and isolation readings are excellent, but modem is not running. How can I isolate the problem ? regards rafal szmidt ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From scott at aobe.com Tue Jan 23 15:12:52 2001 From: scott at aobe.com (Scott Starbuck) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) FAQ availability? References: <000001c0855c$e6ff9990$5500a8c0@tom> Message-ID: <3A6DF3D4.CC7EFCC7@aobe.com> Hi Tom, The nealis.net FAQ has been down for some time now. There are some more sources of info however. Below are some Ascend and related links I'm aware of. Scott Starbuck Aobe Network Group --------------------- > http://archives.real-time.com/rte-ascend/ - Current searchable archive > of this list > > ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/ > > http://www.hal-pc.org/~ascend/MaxTNT/index.html - TNT info. > > http://www.connectnet.com/support/isdn/pipeline-dial.html - This page > will automatically decipher IP packets that caused dialouts from your > pipeline. > > http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ (1995 - August 1998) - Searchable > archive but not current. > > http://noc.dreamscape.com/aview/ - With this utility, you can view the > users on your Maxes, view > individual users' download throughput, and issue hangups via SNMP. > > http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html - MRTG Multi > Router Traffic Grapher > > http://www.taloncc.com/maxstat/ - MaxStat is an SNMP Network Access > Server (NAS) statistics gathering and monitoring tool targeted at ISPs > and corporations using any of the many supported NAS products. > > http://www.lucent.com > > http://www.esight.com > > Lists > > Ascend Max users > > Ascend users > > Pipeline Users Mailing List > Sponsored by Cymitar Technology Group, Inc. -- > To unsubscribe: send 'unsubscribe' to > > > ----------------- Tom Allebrandi wrote: > Hi! > > At the end of each message on the mailing list I see the following: > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > To get FAQ'd: > > When I try to access the FAQ link, I get a 404 error - File not found. > > I've tried it from the office, I've tried it from home. I've tried it from > WIndows 98, I've tried it from Windows NT. The only thing I haven't tried it > on is something other than IE 5.5. > > Is the problem my browser? Or, is the FAQ off line? > > Thanks! > > --- Tom > Tom Allebrandi > tom@ytram.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ianmaurer at hotmail.com Tue Jan 23 17:58:04 2001 From: ianmaurer at hotmail.com (Ian Maurer) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Maxtnt for sale Message-ID: anybody interested in buying a MAXTNT, with the following: LUCENT/ASCEND MAXTNT TNT-2AC-H with the following: 1 shelf controller card with 32mb DRAM card and 8mb FLASH card 1 8 port T1 card 1 4 port Ethernet card 1 24 port SDSL card 1 HDLC2 card 6 TNT-SL-48MOD-S-C modem cards product is used but is in perfect working condition. This particular box is worth over $38,000 brand new. Guaranteed not to be DOA. Software has just been reinstalled from scratch and is version 7.2.4. Please send all inquiries to ianmaurer@hotmail.com. Thank you. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From rafal at inet.pl Wed Jan 24 02:22:42 2001 From: rafal at inet.pl (Rafal Szmidt) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax References: Message-ID: <3A6E90D2.A5DEBE53@inet.pl> > Is there any type of new lighting fixture or dimmer > switch being used nearby? It has been my experience > on a few occasions to see this type of interference knock > out a DSL connection. I don't think this is the case. Our cables are separated very good in the building. I check also customer side for any new installations / modifications but they claim nothing has changed from several months. What I suspect is rather some tricky modification on CO. Maybe they have connected some signal on nearby wire that is passing different CO premises and this interrupts my link. Lately a lot of new high bandwidth connections are installed every month. The worst is I even don't know how to measure this signal or to see it from DSL transceiver perspective. Any ideas ? regards rafal ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From stephane.branchoux at univ-perp.fr Wed Jan 24 04:20:15 2001 From: stephane.branchoux at univ-perp.fr (Stephane BRANCHOUX) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Monitor max2012 Message-ID: <200101241020.LAA24852@gala.univ-perp.fr> Hello, I try to monitor with mrtg line usage (number of users online) an dethernet traffic on my max2012. All is ok for ethernet interface but i don't know the good target to monitor number of users online. I tried : Target[max2012_4]: 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.10.5.0&1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.24.0:mycommunity@max2012 but all i have is zero user connected. Many thanks in advance. Stephane BRANCHOUX Stephane.Branchoux@univ-perp.fr Tel : 04.68.66.21.24 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ae at farlep.net Wed Jan 24 15:15:35 2001 From: ae at farlep.net (Andrew A. Yerofyeyev) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) May be you can help me ? (problem with MAX 6000) Message-ID: <200101241314.PAA16592@sun.farlep.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010124/74bbe9c9/attachment.html From pwthoma at anc.net Wed Jan 24 14:11:33 2001 From: pwthoma at anc.net (Paul Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Modem card not available... In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010124094938.00a27340@cp-tel.net> Message-ID: <5.0.1.4.2.20010124141022.039fb0a8@mail.anc.net> It is most likely the modem card going bad. I recommend swapping the order of the card to see if the problem follows the modem card or the port on the chassis. Paul At 10:46 AM 1/24/2001, Chris Clements wrote: >Engineers, > > I have a MAX 4000 that came with 3, 16 port modem cards. When I > enter the interface for the MAX, it now shows that one of the slots is > not available. > > For example; this is what I expect to see: > > 30-000 K56 Modem-16 > 40-000 K56 Modem-16 > 50-000 K56 Modem-16 > > This is what I really see: > > 30-000 Not Avail > 40-000 K56 Modem-16 > 50-000 K56 Modem-16 > > Is this an indication that the card has "bought the farm"? > This is on a CT1, so some of the channels are assigned to the > now-missing slot. This is a problem. >Chris Clements > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >To get FAQ'd: > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Wed Jan 24 19:45:17 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Modem card not available... In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010124094938.00a27340@cp-tel.net> Message-ID: Chris, The modem failed to initialize when you rebooted your max. I learned a couple years ago to always check this when rebooting or cycling the power on a Max. I'm not sure of the cause or a fix. Hasn't been pressing enough for me to put in a support call, the modems always seem to come up for me on a second boot. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 They told me to think out of the box, but I tripped over it, now I own my own company. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Chris Clements ** Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:46 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Modem card not available... ** ** ** Engineers, ** ** I have a MAX 4000 that came with 3, 16 port modem cards. ** When I enter the ** interface for the MAX, it now shows that one of the slots is not ** available. ** ** For example; this is what I expect to see: ** ** 30-000 K56 Modem-16 ** 40-000 K56 Modem-16 ** 50-000 K56 Modem-16 ** ** This is what I really see: ** ** 30-000 Not Avail ** 40-000 K56 Modem-16 ** 50-000 K56 Modem-16 ** ** Is this an indication that the card has "bought the farm"? ** This is on a CT1, so some of the channels are assigned to ** the now-missing ** slot. This is a problem. ** Chris Clements ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ae at farlep.net Wed Jan 24 14:42:53 2001 From: ae at farlep.net (Andrew A. Yerofyeyev) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) May be you can help me ? (problem with MAX 6000) Message-ID: <200101241241.OAA14095@sun.farlep.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010124/df1c7080/attachment.htm From troy at psknet.com Wed Jan 24 19:48:56 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax In-Reply-To: <3A6E90D2.A5DEBE53@inet.pl> Message-ID: Is it also possible that a new bridgetap got put in and added a few thousand feet of copper somewhere? I don't know my way around DSL yet, but have been around our telco people for a while to know that when they put a bridgetap in somewhere, they don't necessarily pay attention to what they may be affecting. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 They told me to think out of the box, but I tripped over it, now I own my own company. ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Rafal Szmidt ** Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:23 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DSL Pipline HST <-> DSLMax ** ** ** ** > Is there any type of new lighting fixture or dimmer ** > switch being used nearby? It has been my experience ** > on a few occasions to see this type of interference knock ** > out a DSL connection. ** ** I don't think this is the case. Our cables are separated very good in ** the building. ** I check also customer side for any new installations / modifications but ** they claim nothing has changed from several months. What I suspect is ** rather some tricky modification on CO. Maybe they have connected some ** signal on nearby wire that is passing different CO premises and this ** interrupts ** my link. Lately a lot of new high bandwidth connections are installed ** every month. The worst is I even don't know how to measure this ** signal or to see it from DSL transceiver perspective. Any ideas ? ** ** regards ** rafal ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** To get FAQ'd: ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From troy at psknet.com Wed Jan 24 09:45:28 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:02 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) May be you can help me ? (problem with MAX 6000) In-Reply-To: <200101241314.PAA16592@sun.farlep.net> Message-ID: Andrew, I've seen this once before, and it required an RMA. Looking back, I think that I might have had luck with the NINDY interface, but that would void what little warrantee these things have. Call/email Lucent to start your RMA process, I'm confident that you don't have any other options (unless you want to risk voiding your warantee). -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Andrew A. Yerofyeyev Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:16 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) May be you can help me ? (problem with MAX 6000) Hello ! I read the conference devoted Ascend MAX and have seen your message. There can be you can help me with solution of a problem with which I has faced: After unsuccessful software upgrade my MAX 6000 at startup (booting) produces on a console the following messages (in cycle) : MAX6000 Boot PROM 1.4 Trying main onboard flash load... get gzipped load... Operation fault at: b0ffe5d0 Fault record is on stack at b0000410: fdata : 00000000 00000000 00000000 fsubtype 01: fflags : 00 MAX6000 Boot PROM 1.4 Trying main onboard flash load... get gzipped load... Operation fault at: b0ffe5d0 Fault record is on stack at b0000410: fdata : 00000000 00000000 00000000 fsubtype 01: fflags : 00 All my attempts to fill in it wearing with the help of xmodem have terminated unsuccessfully. Probably, you can prompt any exit from this situation. If you can not help me, please, advise me to address to whom. My dealer to be in the other city and it is inconvenient to us to access for help to him. The information about our Accend Max: *** Lucent Technologies Model: MX60-4E1-AC Serial No: 10274030 Input Rating: 100-240VAC 5A *** PS If sometime you will have the question about MAX 6000, I shall be glad to answer you , if I can. :') -- Best regards, Andrew A. Yerofyeyev +38 048 7352478 +38 048 7150059 mailto:ae@farlep.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jan 24 10:58:29 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Is there a preferred service/host in TAOS? In-Reply-To: <200101240645.WAA06841@max.bungi.com> References: <200101240645.WAA06841@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Francesco Lovergine > >As you know (maybe) Lucent Portmaster series is at its deadline. >We use extensively a nice feature of ComOS and we need to know >in advance if it is supported on Lucent MAX boxes. > >Is there the possibility to pre-define a default/preferred host >and service (tcp port) to open 'netdata' - this is the PM definition - >session with it? With >PM whenever a call arrives and a user logons with a specific name/password >the box open a tcp session on port X with host Y in pass-through mode >(i.e. without translation or interpretation of any character - this >is different from a telnet sessions which capture some specific >control chars such as Ctrl-]). This nice feature is used in our >private network to build up custom client/server applications >with some mbedded systems with limited capacities - which cannot open a ppp >session and then connect the suitable host. This is called a TCP Clear connection on a Max and it does exactly what you need. We used to use it to pass UUCP traffic to our mail server. Worked great. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From os at landshut.org Wed Jan 24 06:13:19 2001 From: os at landshut.org (Oliver Stettner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Unknown log message Message-ID: <3A6EC6DF.E2B930CC@landshut.org> Hi everybody, just for curiosity - does anybody know what the following log entry mean? Jan 24 13:01:53 tnt01 1/11: IP pool address recovered ipaddress <212.72.92.43> leaked 12990 ticks ago Thanx, Oliver. -- Oliver Stettner | mailto:os@landshut.org Laendgasse 120 | http://www.landshut.org/members/os/ D-84028 Landshut | ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cclements at cp-tel.net Wed Jan 24 10:46:11 2001 From: cclements at cp-tel.net (Chris Clements) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Modem card not available... Message-ID: <4.2.2.20010124094938.00a27340@cp-tel.net> Engineers, I have a MAX 4000 that came with 3, 16 port modem cards. When I enter the interface for the MAX, it now shows that one of the slots is not available. For example; this is what I expect to see: 30-000 K56 Modem-16 40-000 K56 Modem-16 50-000 K56 Modem-16 This is what I really see: 30-000 Not Avail 40-000 K56 Modem-16 50-000 K56 Modem-16 Is this an indication that the card has "bought the farm"? This is on a CT1, so some of the channels are assigned to the now-missing slot. This is a problem. Chris Clements ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tim at futuresouth.com Thu Jan 25 04:43:18 2001 From: tim at futuresouth.com (Tim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT Message-ID: <20010125044318.A24502@futuresouth.com> Alright guys, this should've been easy one. After much digging, I finally ran across a reference on this. You must set ip-global -> ospf-global -> as-boundary-router = yes for non-OSPF routes to be redistributed into OSPF. All I can say is that the TNT manual stinks. I must've read the description for this parameter a zillion times and nowhere does it say anything about redistribution. I suppose if I am an OSPF guru I'd have know all the implications of an as-boundary-router. Oh well. Tim ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From ralf.manhalter at wuerttembergische.de Thu Jan 25 04:19:30 2001 From: ralf.manhalter at wuerttembergische.de (Ralf Manhalter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT References: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> <3A6D7311.AF70FB59@landshut.org> <20010124174406.B5171@futuresouth.com> Message-ID: <3A6FFDB2.43E1D541@wuerttembergische.de> hello, you must boot after changing ospf-settings with taos lower than 7.x. with taos 8.x you dont must boot, say lucent. on our max we have taos 7.2.4 and ospf runs with cisco. greetings ralf Tim wrote: > Have tried all the suggested settings - still no luck. Does one need to > reboot after changing OSPF settings? Is there a way to kick the OSPF > process? > > "ospf internal" shows "Empty" - I am not sure if it means anything. > > Thanks, > > Tim > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cwiley at nfis.com Thu Jan 25 06:35:27 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (Clint Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) nimby a 6000 Message-ID: Hi. Anyone know which jumper to close on a max 6000 to get nimby? Something went wrong on an upgrade.... Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cwiley at nfis.com Wed Jan 24 12:50:07 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (Clint Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) pending 195 list problem. Message-ID: As has been described here in the past, we are having problems with maxen running 7.x.x and 8.x.x needing a reboot after they start adding modems to the pending 195 list. This seems to happen on a 24 to 48 hour basis. We have max 6000's w/o flash memory running the following: SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 7.0.26 Is there a stable code release that can solve this problem? We also are having the problem on a few lagacy 4048's. SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m40 Revision: 7.0.26 Should I downgrade to a 6.1.x ver? THanks. Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kenk at shreve.net Thu Jan 25 10:24:59 2001 From: kenk at shreve.net (Ken Kirchner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DSLPipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Anyone know if DSL Pipelines support g.lite? If not, what do they support? -- Ken Kirchner : kenk@shreve.net Assitant System Administrator : Tel (318)222-2638 ShreveNet, Inc. : Fax (318)213-2650 ShreveNet - Your Premium Internet Service Provider! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From kevin at vigor.nu Thu Jan 25 13:39:26 2001 From: kevin at vigor.nu (Kevin Vigor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) nimby a 6000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 25-Jan-2001 Clint Wiley wrote: > Anyone know which jumper to close on a max 6000 to get nimby? > Something > went wrong on an upgrade.... You don't need to jumper it; connect to the serial port, power cycle it, and at the initial boot prompt, type "Ascend" (it won't echo, but you'll know when you've done it right because it'll drop into the debugger). Peace, Kevin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tim at futuresouth.com Wed Jan 24 17:44:06 2001 From: tim at futuresouth.com (Tim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT In-Reply-To: ; from sp@iphh.net on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 03:30:59PM +0100 References: <20010113173625.A8272@futuresouth.com> <3A6D7311.AF70FB59@landshut.org> Message-ID: <20010124174406.B5171@futuresouth.com> Have tried all the suggested settings - still no luck. Does one need to reboot after changing OSPF settings? Is there a way to kick the OSPF process? "ospf internal" shows "Empty" - I am not sure if it means anything. Thanks, Tim ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Jan 26 11:39:50 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) OSPF distribution on TNT In-Reply-To: <200101260645.WAA17273@max.bungi.com> References: <200101260645.WAA17273@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Tim > >All I can say is that the TNT manual stinks. I must've read the >description for this parameter a zillion times and nowhere does it say >anything about redistribution. I suppose if I am an OSPF guru I'd have >know all the implications of an as-boundary-router. Oh well. You don't mention what version of the manual you're reading, but PDF docs for 8.0 are available on eSight, and they're a hell of a lot better than they used to be. If that's what you're already using, well, everything's relative, right? -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Jan 26 11:44:18 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) DSLPipeline In-Reply-To: <200101260645.WAA17273@max.bungi.com> References: <200101260645.WAA17273@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Ken Kirchner > >Anyone know if DSL Pipelines support g.lite? If not, what do they >support? "Connecting to other Ascend DSL gear." Usually. ;-) The DSL Max 20 is supposed to interoperate with Copper Mountain, but I wasn't able to get it to work when I tested one with a Netopia R7100. Oh right, Xpeed makes stuff that works with the Max 20. So to answer your question, I think a DSL Pipe can train up with 1) another DSL Pipe 2) a DSL Max 3) Xpeed bridges If anyone's managed to get anything else working, I'd love to hear about it. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tjagger at overland.net Sat Jan 27 20:38:00 2001 From: tjagger at overland.net (Todd Jagger) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Pipeline 50 --> non-hunting BRI Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010127203510.00ad25f8@mail.overland.net> Hi, I need to connect a Pipeline 50 to a BRI (on a portmaster 2e w/ 5-BRI card) that does not rollover/hunt on the numbers; meaning the p50 needs to dial two different phone numbers to connect both it's B-channels. I know other ISDN routers and modems let you do this by entering the numbers like "5551111&5552222" but I do not see any way to configure the P50 to do this. Is there any way to connect a P50 to a non-hunting BRI? To specify the two distinct Dial #'s for it to use? I can see the part about Alt. #'s , but my understanding is those are just failovers, right? Unit is running revision 7.3.1, btw. Thanks in advance, TMJ From rocca at multiboard.com Sun Jan 28 00:07:13 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DSLPipeline (Xpeed story...) In-Reply-To: <200101270645.WAA21889@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <003001c088f0$8ef6ee50$0179a8c0@multiboard.com> > So to answer your question, I think a DSL Pipe can train up with > 1) another DSL Pipe > 2) a DSL Max > 3) Xpeed bridges Xpeed story follows: Normally we use DSL-HST's back to back for SDSL, however we thought we'd try the Xpeed PCI SDSL card, connected to an HST - primarily for price and that some of our customers don't need a LAN interconnection. Our sales guy said they were bridges only as well, however to our pleasent surprise when we plugged them in, they do indeed route as well -- at least they did under Windows 2000. I can't speak to any other driver versions, but under Windows 2000 we had no problem setting them up to route IP. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From goemon at anime.net Sun Jan 28 00:57:39 2001 From: goemon at anime.net (Dan Hollis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) DSLPipeline (Xpeed story...) In-Reply-To: <003001c088f0$8ef6ee50$0179a8c0@multiboard.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Peter Rocca wrote: > Our sales guy said they were bridges only as well Your sales guy is a bonehead. Xpeed PCI are simple synchronous serial cards using DSL transceivers and will do anything the OS tells them to -- bridge, route, or toast bread. Linux drivers too. Wink wink nudge nudge. -Dan ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From rocca at multiboard.com Sun Jan 28 14:08:36 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSLPipeline (Xpeed story...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000501c08966$192887d0$0179a8c0@multiboard.com> I should qualify that -- my "supplier's sales rep" is a bonehead. :-) As for the toast module, I've been a little hesitant to try it, but maybe I'll give it a shot next time I'm a little hungry. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon@anime.net] > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1:58 AM > To: Peter Rocca > Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DSLPipeline (Xpeed story...) > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Peter Rocca wrote: > > Our sales guy said they were bridges only as well > > Your sales guy is a bonehead. Xpeed PCI are simple synchronous serial > cards using DSL transceivers and will do anything the OS tells them to -- > bridge, route, or toast bread. > > Linux drivers too. Wink wink nudge nudge. > > -Dan > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cwiley at nfis.com Tue Jan 30 06:42:35 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (Clint Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) route pick up In-Reply-To: <003001c088f0$8ef6ee50$0179a8c0@multiboard.com> Message-ID: Hi. I just put a new Max 6069 into service and I have a problem where it picks up an incorrect route to a DNS/mail server. I have to delete the route, and it will run fine for a few hours. The route looks like this: 206.151.91.4/32 206.151.91.4 wan77 The box is not running rip. The IP and subnet of both the max and default gateway are correct. The DNS server in question is two hops away, like so: traceroute to 206.151.91.4 (206.151.91.4), 30 hops max, 0 byte packets 1 (206.151.91.97) 10 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 (206.151.91.89) 10 ms 10 ms 0 ms 3 (206.151.91.4) 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms ascend% Any idea where this route could be picked up? Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From shaavik at soc.lib.md.us Tue Jan 30 08:37:36 2001 From: shaavik at soc.lib.md.us (Steve Haavik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) pending 195 list problem. References: Message-ID: <3A76D1B0.6000009@soc.lib.md.us> Clint Wiley wrote: > As has been described here in the past, we are having problems with maxen > running 7.x.x and 8.x.x needing a reboot after they start adding modems to > the pending 195 list. This seems to happen on a 24 to 48 hour basis. > > We have max 6000's w/o flash memory running the following: > > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 7.0.26 > > Is there a stable code release that can solve this problem? > > We also are having the problem on a few lagacy 4048's. > > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m40 Revision: 7.0.26 > > Should I downgrade to a 6.1.x ver? > I've tried everything short of 9.0.0 in the one site where we are having this problem and nothing has fixed it. I haven't tried going back to version 6 though. I'm reasonably sure that our ploblem is being caused by the number of bogus calls we are getting on that PRI (just about every failed call has a dialed number that shouldn't be on our PRI and Verizon doesn't seem to understand that this is a problem) so you may want to find out why it's adding modems to the 195 list. Between this, the SNMP issues (I opened a ticket and they still don't understand why I think it's a problem), and the utter lack of a useful T1 (nailed PPP) bonding implementation (not to mention some of the worst support I've ever had the misfortune of having to use), we've decided to try out a different vendor. I hear Cisco and Nortel are nice... -- Steve Haavik Sailor Operations Center shaavik@soc.lib.md.us Office: 410-396-5551 Cell: 443-829-1532 Pager: 443-829-1532 or 4438291532@page.nextel.com or pshaavik@soc.lib.md.us ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From Frank.Joy at RANDOLPH.AF.MIL Tue Jan 30 18:38:17 2001 From: Frank.Joy at RANDOLPH.AF.MIL (Joy Frank J MSgt AETC/DSR) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX T1/PRI Message-ID: <6EBD1A1C91CED411B7CB00034708EB52363E62@fstymx27.randolph.af.mil> Can anybody point me in the right direction to getting my MAX programmed. Do not have a manual (is there a copy I can find) Thanks MSgt. Frank J. Joy, Jr. Superintendent, Command Videoconference Network HQ AETC/DSR Randolph AFB, TX * DSN 487-3355 FAX (5767) *Comm. 210-652-3355 FAX (5767) * frank.joy@randolph.af.mil ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From harpreet at agni.org Wed Jan 31 00:58:25 2001 From: harpreet at agni.org (Harpreet Singh Giani) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:03 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) max 3000 transmit settings Message-ID: <3A77B791.555095E5@agni.org> Hi I have just finished setting up my Max 3000s (E1 - India). I was wondering what would be the best setting for "CELL-LEVEL" (currently set at 18) "MDM Trn Level" (currently set at 13) "CELL First" (currently set at NO) Thanx ___ hsg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From darkshot at chudys.com Tue Jan 30 13:29:44 2001 From: darkshot at chudys.com (Darkshot) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Best TAOS for 4K? Message-ID: <3A771628.2587B0D5@chudys.com> Hi, everyone. I've been away from the list for a while, but still monitor it. I've been running 7.0.3 on both Max 6K and 4K boxes, and I disabled K56FLEX support some time ago and it helped 40% of my disconnect problems. The users that still have the problem are always fixed by flashing their antique x2 modems to V.90 but I still have some random disconnects and other weirdness. Anway, I'm willing to risk another code update- from reading the list it seems that 7.2.3 is stable. However, I can't find it for the 4K boxes. I know that Lucent was going to phase out support for the 4K (drat them) but the docs on the 7.2.3 release specifically mentions fixes for Max 4Ks. WTF? Is 7.2.3 available for the 4K after all, and just not on the ftp site, or what? Any input on this is appreciated. Hey, Kevin! 'Shot ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Jan 30 16:07:38 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Best TAOS for 4K? In-Reply-To: <3A771628.2587B0D5@chudys.com> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010131090738.04772210@mail.ascend.com.au> At 02:29 PM 1/30/01 -0500, Darkshot wrote: >Hi, everyone. I've been away from the list for a while, but still >monitor it. > >I've been running 7.0.3 on both Max 6K and 4K boxes, and I disabled >K56FLEX support >some time ago and it helped 40% of my disconnect problems. The users >that still >have the problem are always fixed by flashing their antique x2 modems to >V.90 >but I still have some random disconnects and other weirdness. > >Anway, I'm willing to risk another code update- from reading the list it >seems >that 7.2.3 is stable. However, I can't find it for the 4K boxes. I know >that >Lucent was going to phase out support for the 4K (drat them) but the >docs on >the 7.2.3 release specifically mentions fixes for Max 4Ks. WTF? Is 7.2.3 >available >for the 4K after all, and just not on the ftp site, or what? 7.0.26 is the last release for Max 4K I'll leave it up to others to recommend their favourite. Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From niederhuefner at prolink.de Wed Jan 31 04:05:56 2001 From: niederhuefner at prolink.de (Ralf Niederhuefner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) route pick up In-Reply-To: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <001201c08b6d$67d45a40$f7a6cbc1@VOYAGER> Hi Clint, maybe one of your dialin-users got his TCP/IP-settings wrong and does assign that IP to his dialup-interface. You should check your MAX not to allow this. If you set Ethernet/ Mod Config/ WAN options/ Pool only=Yes this will be prohibited, so that any user assigning an IP to himself will trigger "LAN security error" instead of beeing logged in. regards, Ralf -----Original Message----- From: Clint Wiley Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:42:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: (ASCEND) route pick up Hi. I just put a new Max 6069 into service and I have a problem where it picks up an incorrect route to a DNS/mail server. I have to delete the route, and it will run fine for a few hours. The route looks like this: 206.151.91.4/32 206.151.91.4 wan77 The box is not running rip. The IP and subnet of both the max and default gateway are correct. The DNS server in question is two hops away, like so: traceroute to 206.151.91.4 (206.151.91.4), 30 hops max, 0 byte packets 1 (206.151.91.97) 10 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 (206.151.91.89) 10 ms 10 ms 0 ms 3 (206.151.91.4) 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms ascend% Any idea where this route could be picked up? Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From harpreet at agni.org Wed Jan 31 05:47:04 2001 From: harpreet at agni.org (Harpreet Singh Giani) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 3000 Serial Wan Message-ID: <3A77FB38.88BEE620@agni.org> Can anyone help me out here ... On my Max 3000, I have connected an E1 (clocked down to 1Mbps) to the serial WAN port using a V.35 connector and it is working well. However, I do not know what to put in the "Serial Wan -> Mod Config -> Ext. Clock * 1K" field. Should it be 1024 (since I am using 1Mbps) or should it be 64 ? Would appreciate a quick reply. ___ hsg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From mlevans at blacksburg.net Tue Jan 30 17:00:19 2001 From: mlevans at blacksburg.net (Lyle Evans) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Best TAOS for 4K? Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010130180019.00923ad0@pop.blacksburg.net> At 02:29 PM 1/30/01 -0500, you wrote: >Hi, everyone. I've been away from the list for a while, but still >monitor it. > >I've been running 7.0.3 on both Max 6K and 4K boxes, and I disabled >K56FLEX support >some time ago and it helped 40% of my disconnect problems. The users >that still >have the problem are always fixed by flashing their antique x2 modems to >V.90 >but I still have some random disconnects and other weirdness. > >Anway, I'm willing to risk another code update- from reading the list it >seems >that 7.2.3 is stable. However, I can't find it for the 4K boxes. I know >that >Lucent was going to phase out support for the 4K (drat them) but the >docs on >the 7.2.3 release specifically mentions fixes for Max 4Ks. WTF? Is 7.2.3 >available >for the 4K after all, and just not on the ftp site, or what? > > As far as I can tell the only higher releases for the Max 4xxxs are 7.0.4, 7.0.22, and 7.0.26. I don't know for sure but it seems based on all I have read, that 7.0.22 is the better of the 3, but I would also love to hear pros and cons from other concerning their experiences. I have seen some comments that lead me to beleive that there may be more issues with CT1s than with ISDN PRIs and these releases. Lyle Evans Blacksburg.Net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cwiley at nfis.com Wed Jan 31 08:16:09 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (Clint Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) route pick up In-Reply-To: <001201c08b6d$67d45a40$f7a6cbc1@VOYAGER> Message-ID: On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ralf Niederhuefner wrote: > Hi Clint, > > maybe one of your dialin-users got his TCP/IP-settings wrong > and does assign that IP to his dialup-interface. > You should check your MAX not to allow this. If you set > > Ethernet/ > Mod Config/ > WAN options/ > Pool only=Yes > > this will be prohibited, so that any user assigning an IP to > himself will trigger "LAN security error" instead of beeing > logged in. > That is exactly what it was. Thanks to everyone who responded. Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From cwiley at nfis.com Wed Jan 31 08:18:56 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (Clint Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) pending 195 list problem. In-Reply-To: <3A76D1B0.6000009@soc.lib.md.us> Message-ID: > I've tried everything short of 9.0.0 in the one site where we are having this > problem and nothing has fixed it. I haven't tried going back to version 6 > though. I'm reasonably sure that our ploblem is being caused by the number of > bogus calls we are getting on that PRI (just about every failed call has a > dialed number that shouldn't be on our PRI and Verizon doesn't seem to > understand that this is a problem) so you may want to find out why it's adding > modems to the 195 list. Between this, the SNMP issues (I opened a ticket and > they still don't understand why I think it's a problem), and the utter lack of a > useful T1 (nailed PPP) bonding implementation (not to mention some of the worst > support I've ever had the misfortune of having to use), we've decided to try out > a different vendor. I hear Cisco and Nortel are nice... > > Another list member told me 9.0 fixed the problem. I upgraded, but have not put it back in service yet. I was also have the problem on a 4048, and backing to 7.0.4 fixed it there. Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jan 31 11:38:54 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Best TAOS for 4K? In-Reply-To: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> References: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Darkshot > >Anway, I'm willing to risk another code update- from reading the list it >seems that 7.2.3 is stable. However, I can't find it for the 4K boxes. I know >that Lucent was going to phase out support for the 4K (drat them) but the >docs on the 7.2.3 release specifically mentions fixes for Max 4Ks. >WTF? Is 7.2.3 >available for the 4K after all, and just not on the ftp site, or what? 7.0.x is the last major release for the EOL'd 4k series. It's currently at 7.0.26 and that's working fine for us. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jan 31 11:36:19 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:04 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) pending 195 list problem. In-Reply-To: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> References: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Steve Haavik >Clint Wiley wrote: > >> As has been described here in the past, we are having problems with maxen >> running 7.x.x and 8.x.x needing a reboot after they start adding modems to >> the pending 195 list. This seems to happen on a 24 to 48 hour basis. >> >> We have max 6000's w/o flash memory running the following: >> >> SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 7.0.26 >> >> Is there a stable code release that can solve this problem? >> >> We also are having the problem on a few lagacy 4048's. >> >> SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: ftbk.m40 Revision: 7.0.26 >> > > Should I downgrade to a 6.1.x ver? > >I've tried everything short of 9.0.0 in the one site where we are having this >problem and nothing has fixed it. Any particular reason you didn't try 9.x? We use it on a TNT with no major problems. >I haven't tried going back to version 6 >though. I'm reasonably sure that our ploblem is being caused by the number of >bogus calls we are getting on that PRI (just about every failed call has a >dialed number that shouldn't be on our PRI and Verizon doesn't seem to >understand that this is a problem) so you may want to find out why it's adding >modems to the 195 list. Ah, telcos. I wonder if some kind of call routing on your Max to drop those bad numbers might make your Max happier. The trouble with having a known telco problem is that you have no way of knowing that it won't make whatever other vendor's gear unhappy too. I'd focus on beating Verizon into submission first. >Between this, the SNMP issues (I opened a ticket and >they still don't understand why I think it's a problem), and the >utter lack of a >useful T1 (nailed PPP) bonding implementation (not to mention some >of the worst >support I've ever had the misfortune of having to use), we've >decided to try out >a different vendor. I hear Cisco and Nortel are nice... Some Maxen support multilink Frame Relay, which should let you bond T1s acceptably. As for the "support", I'm with you there. Utterly pathetic, and I too will be using other vendors in future for that reason. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jan 31 11:42:08 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX T1/PRI In-Reply-To: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> References: <200101310645.WAA15448@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Joy Frank J MSgt AETC/DSR > >Can anybody point me in the right direction to getting my MAX programmed. Do >not have a manual (is there a copy I can find) Thanks Manuals (and software releases) are available at ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Doc/ on or http://www.esight.com/. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From tushar at ecpi.com Wed Jan 31 14:16:31 2001 From: tushar at ecpi.com (Tushar Patel) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FAQ or archive of ascend mailing list? Message-ID: <200101312016.OAA15423@ecpi.com> Hi We just purchased our first Max 3048. I was wondering is there mailing list archive I can go through. Where can I find FAQ's? Thanks, Tushar tpatel@ecpi.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From gdaley at lucent.com Wed Jan 31 16:53:41 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Greg Daley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX T1/PRI In-Reply-To: <6EBD1A1C91CED411B7CB00034708EB52363E62@fstymx27.randolph.a f.mil> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010201095341.0215cac0@mail.ascend.com.au> At 06:38 PM 1/30/01 -0600, Joy Frank J MSgt AETC/DSR wrote: >Can anybody point me in the right direction to getting my MAX programmed. Do >not have a manual (is there a copy I can find) Thanks soft copies of documentation are available at: http://www.lucent.com/ins/doclibrary/library.html also, information is available at http://www.esight.com (login required) Greg ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From nicks at albury.net.au Wed Jan 31 16:57:53 2001 From: nicks at albury.net.au (Nick Slager) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:05 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) FAQ or archive of ascend mailing list? In-Reply-To: <200101312016.OAA15423@ecpi.com>; from tushar@ecpi.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:16:31PM -0600 References: <200101312016.OAA15423@ecpi.com> Message-ID: <20010201095753.A25642@albury.net.au> Thus spake Tushar Patel (tushar@ecpi.com): > I was wondering is there mailing list archive I can go through. > Where can I find FAQ's? There's an archive at http://archives2.real-time.com/rte-ascend/ "Where can I find FAQs?" is almost an FAQ itself. I don't know the answer, though :-) Regards, Nick -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: From takecharge2 at looksmart.com.au Wed Jan 31 21:11:34 2001 From: takecharge2 at looksmart.com.au (takecharge2@looksmart.com.au) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:08 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) earn6figures@bethereorbesquare.co.uk Message-ID: <200102010401.NAA28643@mail.citynet.co.kr> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: multipart/mixed Size: 178 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010131/15417902/attachment.bin