From richard at 808hi.com Sun Jul 1 00:28:57 2001 From: richard at 808hi.com (Richard Gamberg) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010630110346.02c649ac@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: USR doesn't support V.44 - so you can't check that with that client modem. Why not try a Lucent/Agere Win Modem with V.92 - I believe Modem-On-Hold will work with it, and the client driver also supports V.44.... See http://808hi.com/56k/ltwinv92.htm Aloha, Richard http://808hi.com/56k/ 56k=v.Unreliable -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ISPstuff Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 6:04 AM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother We just switched from Max 6096 to TNT with Multi-DSP cards so we could be the first on the block to offer v.92. We are seeing pretty much the same connect speeds and success rates as we did with our 6096 running 8.0.3. All I can say is that v.92 is a big waste of money so far. I picked up a USR v.92 external Sportster as a test and it won't connect to our TNT with either moh (modem on hold) or quick-connect enabled. Lucent does not support PCM-upstream in the current TAOS 9.0-159.0 that we are running. v.44 compression is the only thing that might be working. I haven't actually tested the compression yet but it doesn't affect connections when turned on. Has anyone else reading this list experimented with v.92? I am interested in hearing experience from others. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Sun Jul 1 01:55:12 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) P50 Halted Message-ID: <007901c101fa$c6a92470$094783d5@salec.com.eg> >From: "Jorge Venegas" > >any Know this message ? >I can fix this pipeline 50? what? > > Pipeline > Power-On Self Test > Halted: > CONFIGURE UNIT! Your unit has lost it is serial number due to a mistake in "update/revision" command. Contact the TAC and they will send you a "revision" line which will help Nindy will not work. Ahmad El-Hakim From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Sun Jul 1 16:56:23 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) P50 Halted References: <200106300545.WAA28765@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3B3F9C87.AA2C0990@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> > >From: "Jorge Venegas" > > > >any Know this message ? > >I can fix this pipeline 50? what? > > > > Pipeline > > Power-On Self Test > > Halted: > > CONFIGURE UNIT! > > It's lost it's firmware. You can fix this by jumpering a jumper and > muttering incantations. Search the archives (which were down a moment > ago) for "pipeline" and "jumper", etc. for the exact procedure. > - -- > > Peter Lalor Infoasis I once had the exact same message with my P50. The reason was it had lost its _hash code_, the firmware was OK. So IMHO the jumper procedure will not solve your problem. I don't remember all details but I had to RMA the unit to Ascend. They wouldn't mail me a hash code string so that I could fix it by myself. And I really needed the unit for my internet access... But I do remember I had done nothing to provoke the unit to lose its memory, it just happened. Best regards, Wolfgang _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Netzwerk-Design Remote Access und WAN-L?sungen Storage-L?sungen (RAID, libraries, NAS/SAN) COMPAQ Server und PC Windows NT Implementation und Administration Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ms at polbox.pl Mon Jul 2 08:43:59 2001 From: ms at polbox.pl (Maciej Starski) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) firewall on DSL-HST Message-ID: Hi I have DSL-HST with NAT and two internal subnets and I would like to deny www acess for one of that subnets. How can i do this? I try do this by Secure Connect Manager but without succes. Any ideas? ----------------------------------------- Maciej Starski mailto:ms@polbox.pl ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Mon Jul 2 10:14:17 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) P50 Halted In-Reply-To: <200107020545.WAA08028@max.bungi.com> References: <200107020545.WAA08028@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke" > > > >From: "Jorge Venegas" >> > >> >any Know this message ? >> >I can fix this pipeline 50? what? >> > >> > Pipeline >> > Power-On Self Test >> > Halted: >> > CONFIGURE UNIT! >> >> It's lost it's firmware. You can fix this by jumpering a jumper and >> muttering incantations. Search the archives (which were down a moment >> ago) for "pipeline" and "jumper", etc. for the exact procedure. >> - -- >> >> Peter Lalor Infoasis > >I once had the exact same message with my P50. The reason was it had >lost its _hash code_, the firmware was OK. >So IMHO the jumper procedure will not solve your problem. > >I don't remember all details but I had to RMA the unit to Ascend. They >wouldn't mail me a hash code string so that I could fix it by myself. >And I really needed the unit for my internet access... Now that you mention it, I have also had one lose it's hash code as you say. in my case, I was able to get Lucent to email me the hash code by supplying them the serial number and exact model (from the bottom of the unit). No RMA was necessary. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Mon Jul 2 10:14:48 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Max 6096 - $6500 OBO Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010702101448.01ef2e64@mail.rockriver.net> We have a couple Max 6096 remote access servers left in the 964xxxx serial number range. They are in excellent condition, clean, tested, and guaranteed for 90 days. In stock and ready to ship today. These are the single AC power supply model with 4 T1 interfaces and 6 of the 16 port 56k modem cards for a total of 96 modems. Installed options include ISDN/FR/DC/DS and global digital access. $6500 each OBO. Call 815-968-9888 or contact us by email. Thanks, Tom PS We were using these in our ISP operation and can answer most tech questions about them. We can also make them available for telnet if you would like a look. We recently switched to a Max TNT. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Edwin_Everett at cargill.com Mon Jul 2 11:49:45 2001 From: Edwin_Everett at cargill.com (Edwin_Everett@cargill.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAx800 modems Message-ID: can I get a list from someone which modems I can still use in the max800? Please don't reference the modem approved list from Feb 1999, I need modems that are currently still available for sale. Please forward to the Max800 product manager if you can find him/her. Thanks Edwin_Everett@cargill.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Mon Jul 2 18:44:36 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) firewall on DSL-HST Message-ID: An IP data filter on the connection should do the same thing as SCM, except statically, not dynamically. This function is built into the pipelines and does not require external software Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Maciej Starski [mailto:ms@polbox.pl] > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:44 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) firewall on DSL-HST > > > Hi > I have DSL-HST with NAT and two internal subnets and > I would like to deny www acess for one of that subnets. > How can i do this? > I try do this by Secure Connect Manager but without succes. > Any ideas? > ----------------------------------------- > Maciej Starski mailto:ms@polbox.pl > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Jul 3 01:33:34 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAx800 modems Message-ID: Hello Edwin, Here is what is to my knowledge the most recent of the approved modem lists. Here is a warning in case you missed it in the text. ! Caution: Lucent Technologies makes no representations regarding the conformance of these products to regulations and specifications, their freedom from defect, nor their suitability for a particular application. Lucent Technologies makes no warranties, expressed or implied, regarding these products, and shall not be responsible for consequential, incidental, or punitive damages in connection with their use. Did you raise a TAC case for this issue? Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: MAX_800_Modems - March 2001.pdf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 71649 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010703/bcf165aa/MAX_800_Modems-March2001.obj From jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net Tue Jul 3 07:36:08 2001 From: jfbeam at prime.btitelecom.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010630110346.02c649ac@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, ISPstuff wrote: >All I can say is that v.92 is a big waste of money so far. I picked up a >USR v.92 external Sportster as a test and it won't connect to our TNT with >either moh (modem on hold) or quick-connect enabled. ... Did you bother to read the release note(s) for the code you loaded? In my opinion, Lucent's V.92 support was created by their marketing department. They don't support anything of value -- PCM upstream, fast connect, ... I think CommWorks (aka 3Com, aka USR) are the only people with "functional" (for various definitions) PCM upstream. I know customers are idiots (tm). However, someone has to try to make them happy -- or at least stop whining. These are likely also the same people who cry about their "56k" modem not connecting at 56k. Modems are slow - PERIOD. If you want speed, pay for it. (Cable modem, DSL, microwave,...) --Ricky PS: I've lived on ISDN for years. 64k is fast enough for most things. So I cannot leach warez and porno as fast as it's posted; big deal. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Jul 3 08:37:03 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.3.32.20010630110346.02c649ac@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010703083703.01e564a0@mail.rockriver.net> At 08:36 AM 7/3/01 -0400, you wrote: >On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, ISPstuff wrote: >>All I can say is that v.92 is a big waste of money so far. I picked up a >>USR v.92 external Sportster as a test and it won't connect to our TNT with >>either moh (modem on hold) or quick-connect enabled. >... > >Did you bother to read the release note(s) for the code you loaded? In >my opinion, Lucent's V.92 support was created by their marketing department. >They don't support anything of value -- PCM upstream, fast connect, ... > Of course I did. That is how I learned how to turn the features on and off on the TNT. They are off by default. I see value in both moh and quick connect. PCM Upstream is no yet available according to the release notes. The others are there but don't seem to work with USR v.92. >I think CommWorks (aka 3Com, aka USR) are the only people with "functional" >(for various definitions) PCM upstream. > >I know customers are idiots (tm). However, someone has to try to make them >happy -- or at least stop whining. These are likely also the same people >who cry about their "56k" modem not connecting at 56k. Modems are slow - >PERIOD. If you want speed, pay for it. (Cable modem, DSL, microwave,...) > As a full service ISP we support our customers and the connection type that they buy. I wouldn't call them idiots. We send the troublesome customers to our competition. Most of our customers are quite reasonable and modems do fill a niche. I have used ISDN at home for a few years as well but I plan on putting a tower up (lots of trees) one of these days so I can tap in to our wireless network. I really don't like supporting the LEC any more than necessary. Tom >--Ricky > >PS: I've lived on ISDN for years. 64k is fast enough for most things. So > I cannot leach warez and porno as fast as it's posted; big deal. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sward at voltage.net Tue Jul 3 10:54:30 2001 From: sward at voltage.net (Susie Ward) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Patton 2996 RAS In-Reply-To: <4B62B56D0860D511802700D0B7A87BECD746@TRINIDADMOVER> Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20010703105109.01b6e8b0@mail.voltage.net> Does anyone have any experience with the Patton 2996 from www.patton.com? I've been considering evaluating one of these, but haven't heard much about them. I generally don't have many connection issues with my Max 6096, so I had hoped someone here might have used both Max and Patton boxes and had some opinions between the two they'd like to share. Thanks, Susie ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Tue Jul 3 13:15:36 2001 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Two TNT with Static Dialup Message-ID: I have just added my second TNT server. I have two users that have static IP addresses and I have run into an obvious problem now. I can't route their IP addresses to a single TNT and expect that to work if they dial into the second TNT. I am hoping that someone has a solution that doesn't involve running a routing protocol other than static. I would prefer to stay away from doing that since all my pools work very nicely and I don't have to run OSPF or RIP or something to get peoples routes advertized. My thought was, could I say route the IP's to one of the TNT's and then on that TNT set up a static route to the other TNT for the same IP address? I'm hoping that the TNT's are like a Cisco where a directly connected interface will take over prescedence of a static IP route. I have also tried to route from my Cisco to the named Interface that the TNT's are connected to. This works some of the time, but not all of the time. Anyone have some experience with this, I would love to hear from you. Thanks! David A. Niblett ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Tue Jul 3 15:57:48 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Two TNT with Static Dialup Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030B52@trinidadmover.solunet.com> Hi David, Do you use RADIUS? If so, you can create a user profile for 2 users that you want to have ip addresses statically assigned. Just take the ip addresses from the end of your TNT ip-pool and then decrement the count appropriately. Your TNT will route those 2 users just like anyone else dialing in and getting ip addresses from the pool(s). Just make sure that you disable "must-accept-address-assign" in ip-global. Do both of your TNT's use the same default gateway? If so, then this should solve your issue if I understand you correctly. Good Luck, David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:16 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Two TNT with Static Dialup I have just added my second TNT server. I have two users that have static IP addresses and I have run into an obvious problem now. I can't route their IP addresses to a single TNT and expect that to work if they dial into the second TNT. I am hoping that someone has a solution that doesn't involve running a routing protocol other than static. I would prefer to stay away from doing that since all my pools work very nicely and I don't have to run OSPF or RIP or something to get peoples routes advertized. My thought was, could I say route the IP's to one of the TNT's and then on that TNT set up a static route to the other TNT for the same IP address? I'm hoping that the TNT's are like a Cisco where a directly connected interface will take over prescedence of a static IP route. I have also tried to route from my Cisco to the named Interface that the TNT's are connected to. This works some of the time, but not all of the time. Anyone have some experience with this, I would love to hear from you. Thanks! David A. Niblett ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Jul 3 18:29:42 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Two TNT with Static Dialup Message-ID: It sounds like a typical situation where an ISP expands from 1 to more than 1 RAS at a PoP. A lot of ISP's run RIPv2 send only on their RAS's, and accept the routes on the adjacent router. This allows the advertisement of Static IP addresses regardless of which RAS the user dials into. This router makes routing decisions, such as forwarding the packets received on the ethernet (but with routes via another RAS). The Router can then export the dynamic routes into OSPF/BGP (or not as may be your preference, to use static routes in between PoPs). This works especially well for customers with subnets which are available beyond the single IP address assigned in PPP authentication. The framed route profile from RADIUS is advertised by RIP to the Router, and then into the network. And Abracadabra! No more clunky static routes... Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 4:16 AM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Two TNT with Static Dialup > > > I have just added my second TNT server. I have two users that have > static IP addresses and I have run into an obvious problem now. I > can't route their IP addresses to a single TNT and expect that to > work if they dial into the second TNT. > > I am hoping that someone has a solution that doesn't involve running > a routing protocol other than static. I would prefer to stay away > from doing that since all my pools work very nicely and I don't > have to run OSPF or RIP or something to get peoples routes advertized. > > My thought was, could I say route the IP's to one of the TNT's and > then on that TNT set up a static route to the other TNT for the > same IP address? I'm hoping that the TNT's are like a Cisco where > a directly connected interface will take over prescedence of a > static IP route. > > I have also tried to route from my Cisco to the named Interface that > the TNT's are connected to. This works some of the time, but not all > of the time. > > Anyone have some experience with this, I would love to hear from you. > Thanks! > > David A. Niblett > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From vsv at dnt.ro Thu Jul 5 07:10:28 2001 From: vsv at dnt.ro (Stefanita Vilcu) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Strange accounting record Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On Message-ID: <994335028.1405.3.camel@mescalito.dnt.ro> Hello, I have an Max TNT (sw ver. 8.0.3) and a Radiator (2.18.2) on a RedHat Linux 6.2. I receive some strage accounting packets very often, is there any way to stop/ignore them? Thank you, Stefanita Vilcu *** Received from x.x.x.x port 7011 .... Packet length = 61 04 2c 00 3d 1f 81 a7 c0 8f 3f 32 43 bd 1a 00 b3 b1 6e 94 6c 04 06 c1 e2 64 45 1a 0c 00 00 02 11 56 06 00 00 00 00 28 06 00 00 00 07 29 06 00 00 04 a2 2c 0b 37 32 30 30 31 30 36 30 32 Code: Accounting-Request Identifier: 44 Authentic: <31><129><167><192><143>?2C<189><26><0><179><177>n<148>l Attributes: NAS-IP-Address = x.x.x.x Ascend-Owner-IP-Addr = 0.0.0.0 Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On Acct-Delay-Time = 1186 Acct-Session-Id = "720010602" 14:19:21.797673 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:19:26.795443 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:19:31.795295 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:20:56.817318 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:21:01.798182 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:21:06.794379 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:13.787386 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:18.787312 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:23.787621 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:36.768373 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:41.770545 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:46.767644 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 -- Stefanita Valeriu Vilcu, vsv@dnt.ro Dynamic Network Technologies, Romania Tel: +40-1-2106863 Fax: +40-1-3122745 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cberthoud at ch.photronics.com Thu Jul 5 09:25:02 2001 From: cberthoud at ch.photronics.com (Christian Berthoud) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Connection problem to Cisco 2500 from MAX2000 Message-ID: <3B4478BE.D33A8D0E@ch.photronics.com> Good morning, I have a Max2000, running version +7.2.0. I have a problem when someone calls my PRI from a CISCO 2503 (they have a BRI). it works fine when I call them, the line goes up normaly with CHAP authentication. I have found in the CISCO documentation that we need the following to connect to a non-CISCO router ppp authentication chap callin But it did not solved the problem. When they call the only things I get is : PPPIF: open: routeid 314, incoming YES PPPIF-108: _initAuthentication PPPIF-108: auth mode 3 PPPIF-108: PAP/CHAP/MS-CHAP auth, incoming PPPIF-108: Link Is up. PPPIF-108: pppMpNegUntimeout last 0 layer 0 PPPIF-108: _pppClose called PPPIF-108: cleanup pass Could you give me some advise to debug this connection problem ? Already thank you for your help and support, Christian ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From eric at istal.com Fri Jul 6 02:12:42 2001 From: eric at istal.com (Eric Larsen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) high packet loss References: Message-ID: <00a501c105eb$0cf94240$f6242cc7@istal.com> I have approximately 120 connections running on a TNT through an ethernet-2 card on the 100M port. I am getting a high amount of packet loss. Is this something on the network causing this, or is it on the TNT. Any suggestions on troubleshooting this problem? Eric Larsen eric@istal.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nikolay at smartcom.bg Fri Jul 6 04:15:25 2001 From: nikolay at smartcom.bg (Nikolay P. Stamboliev) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: ascend-users-digest V96 #2317 Message-ID: For me this indicates failed PPP negotiations , concerning the IP layer. Is the Cisco doing NAT? If not, what address/mask are you trying to assign? Also, for a test try to set up the connection with numbered interface addresses - if it works, look at what address/mask you are trying to assign in the initial case? Nikolay Stamboliev Network Support Engineer Haemimont-SmartCom AD Sofia, Bulgaria tel.+359-2-9650505, +359-2-9650650 fax.+359-2-9743469 -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:45 AM To: ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com Subject: ascend-users-digest V96 #2317 ascend-users-digest Thursday, 5 July 19101 Volume 96 : Number 2317 In this issue: (ASCEND) Strange accounting record Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On (ASCEND) Connection problem to Cisco 2500 from MAX2000 (ASCEND) high packet loss ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Stefanita Vilcu Date: 05 Jul 2001 15:10:28 +0300 Subject: (ASCEND) Strange accounting record Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On Hello, I have an Max TNT (sw ver. 8.0.3) and a Radiator (2.18.2) on a RedHat Linux 6.2. I receive some strage accounting packets very often, is there any way to stop/ignore them? Thank you, Stefanita Vilcu *** Received from x.x.x.x port 7011 .... Packet length = 61 04 2c 00 3d 1f 81 a7 c0 8f 3f 32 43 bd 1a 00 b3 b1 6e 94 6c 04 06 c1 e2 64 45 1a 0c 00 00 02 11 56 06 00 00 00 00 28 06 00 00 00 07 29 06 00 00 04 a2 2c 0b 37 32 30 30 31 30 36 30 32 Code: Accounting-Request Identifier: 44 Authentic: <31><129><167><192><143>?2C<189><26><0><179><177>n<148>l Attributes: NAS-IP-Address = x.x.x.x Ascend-Owner-IP-Addr = 0.0.0.0 Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On Acct-Delay-Time = 1186 Acct-Session-Id = "720010602" 14:19:21.797673 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:19:26.795443 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:19:31.795295 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:20:56.817318 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:21:01.798182 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:21:06.794379 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:13.787386 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:18.787312 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:25:23.787621 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:36.768373 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:41.770545 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 14:37:46.767644 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 - -- Stefanita Valeriu Vilcu, vsv@dnt.ro Dynamic Network Technologies, Romania Tel: +40-1-2106863 Fax: +40-1-3122745 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: "Christian Berthoud" Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 16:25:02 +0200 Subject: (ASCEND) Connection problem to Cisco 2500 from MAX2000 Good morning, I have a Max2000, running version +7.2.0. I have a problem when someone calls my PRI from a CISCO 2503 (they have a BRI). it works fine when I call them, the line goes up normaly with CHAP authentication. I have found in the CISCO documentation that we need the following to connect to a non-CISCO router ppp authentication chap callin But it did not solved the problem. When they call the only things I get is : PPPIF: open: routeid 314, incoming YES PPPIF-108: _initAuthentication PPPIF-108: auth mode 3 PPPIF-108: PAP/CHAP/MS-CHAP auth, incoming PPPIF-108: Link Is up. PPPIF-108: pppMpNegUntimeout last 0 layer 0 PPPIF-108: _pppClose called PPPIF-108: cleanup pass Could you give me some advise to debug this connection problem ? Already thank you for your help and support, Christian ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: "Eric Larsen" Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:12:42 -0700 Subject: (ASCEND) high packet loss I have approximately 120 connections running on a TNT through an ethernet-2 card on the 100M port. I am getting a high amount of packet loss. Is this something on the network causing this, or is it on the TNT. Any suggestions on troubleshooting this problem? Eric Larsen eric@istal.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ End of ascend-users-digest V96 #2317 ************************************ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++ To unsubscribe: "echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com" Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hugh at open.com.au Fri Jul 6 04:09:30 2001 From: hugh at open.com.au (Hugh Irvine) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: (RADIATOR) Strange accounting record Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On In-Reply-To: <994335028.1405.3.camel@mescalito.dnt.ro> References: <994335028.1405.3.camel@mescalito.dnt.ro> Message-ID: Hello Stafanita - These are normal startup packets from a NAS after it reboots, but it looks like you are not responding to them correctly. I suspect you may not have a Client entry for this NAS in the Radiator configuration file. I will need to see a copy of your configuration file (no secrets) together with a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening. thanks Hugh At 15:10 +0300 01/7/5, Stefanita Vilcu wrote: >Hello, > >I have an Max TNT (sw ver. 8.0.3) and a Radiator (2.18.2) on a RedHat >Linux 6.2. >I receive some strage accounting packets very often, is there any way to >stop/ignore them? > >Thank you, > >Stefanita Vilcu > >*** Received from x.x.x.x port 7011 .... > >Packet length = 61 >04 2c 00 3d 1f 81 a7 c0 8f 3f 32 43 bd 1a 00 b3 >b1 6e 94 6c 04 06 c1 e2 64 45 1a 0c 00 00 02 11 >56 06 00 00 00 00 28 06 00 00 00 07 29 06 00 00 >04 a2 2c 0b 37 32 30 30 31 30 36 30 32 >Code: Accounting-Request >Identifier: 44 >Authentic: <31><129><167><192><143>?2C<189><26><0><179><177>n<148>l >Attributes: > NAS-IP-Address = x.x.x.x > Ascend-Owner-IP-Addr = 0.0.0.0 > Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On > Acct-Delay-Time = 1186 > Acct-Session-Id = "720010602" > >14:19:21.797673 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:19:26.795443 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:19:31.795295 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:20:56.817318 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:21:01.798182 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:21:06.794379 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:25:13.787386 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:25:18.787312 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:25:23.787621 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:37:36.768373 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:37:41.770545 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 >14:37:46.767644 eth0 < bucharest2 7011 > xxx.radacct: udp 61 > > >-- >Stefanita Valeriu Vilcu, vsv@dnt.ro >Dynamic Network Technologies, Romania >Tel: +40-1-2106863 Fax: +40-1-3122745 > > >=== >Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/ >Announcements on radiator-announce@open.com.au >To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@open.com.au' with >'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message. -- NB: I am travelling this week, so there may be delays in our correspondence. Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, Platypus, Freeside, Interbiller, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc, etc. Available on Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jyrki.kainulainen at datatie.fi Fri Jul 6 08:15:29 2001 From: jyrki.kainulainen at datatie.fi (Jyrki Kainulainen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Thank's to Lucent emea :-) Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010706084336.00a8a4b0@mail.datatie.fi> Hello all. We have one TNT in our production network and we have had a few issues with it. 1. Refresh -a not working ok with RADIUS permconn-sys-x profiles 2. E1 / HDLC and BACP with MultilinkPPP connections, where multilink bundle includes B channels from multiple HDLC cards. 3. TNT dialout (ISDN) and ISDN router CLID callback with RADIUS profiles. All these were open cases in Lucent emea. Lets start with case 3: It was oppened about 9th. of March 2001. Many different people (emea) were telling me that it should work ok and with Navis Radius it works and so on. We were desperate until this week when this case was resolved. We used Vrouter, ATM-Direct and CLID radius authentication so this wasn't an easy case. What we needed was a correct radius user profiles with neccessary attributes and everyhting started to work. Emea couldn't tell us how it should be done, just telling that it SHOULD work. I got some examples how to configure tnt dialout and expect callback, but they were not modified for our setup conserning e.g. Vrouters. So this wasn't a bug and I'm happy now after this case is closed, but I think 4 months is way too much for us to wait and cry! Case 2: This case was oppened about 8th of May 2001. Issue was that ISDN user dials in, gets one B-channel from first HDCL card and second channel from another HDLC card. Now there were MP connection were channel buldle included channels from two different HDLC cards. When user stopped to sending/receiving data and BACP should have dropped that second channel away, an error ocurred. BACP couldn't drop channel from another HDLC card, so user had those 2 channels open "forever". This was confirmed as a bug by emea. 19th of Jun 2001 I got an engineering TAOS release 8.0.4e58 where this issue was solved. Because this fix couldn't be included in upcoming TAOS 8.0.5 GA at end of July 2001, I was told that after release of 8.0.5 a new eload will be done conserning this issue. This case was handled pretty well I should say. Case 1: This case was oppened about 5th of Dec 2000. We have ATM connection profiles and static route profiles configured in radius. When profile is changed in radius these changes should be applied also in TNT. This is done by using "refresh" command. When some permconn profile was changed in radius and TNT refreshed, that changed connection were disconnected and never established until second refresh command was given. And if one permconn profile were deleted, tnt shows that profile still with dir conn command. This isn't a big problem, but still annoing. We got broken link to eload e33 (Jun 7) for this issue also, and finally working link at June 26, but it didn't work as it should (not in our setup). Some emea engineer has tested this eload and this should have been fixed in TAOS 9.0.3 GA, but atleast ones I tested it with 9.0.3 it didn't work ok. So this case is still kind of "open" and I will do some more testing and let see what happens. Final conclusions: I think there are some great guys and gals in the emea, but also some "less great" and cases are hanging there way too long. Of cource I'm happy after case 3, but as I told earlier, 4 months to get 2 radius attributes in place is just too much! This need to be improved a lot, if Lucent want to be in busines. We as an ISP (Finland) are always comparing other support to Ciscos TAC and from there we at least get very fast responses via email (10 - 30 min) and usually that's only we have needed. Personally I don't like Cisco equipment very much, but I have to live with it. And support from Cisco has been good enough at least for me. At this time I'm happy with our TNT and I can easily sleep over nights and not to think about it. Time is 16:11 here in Finland, the sun is shining almost all night long and the temperature is close to 30 C. So I think it's good time to stop worrying and be happy and enjoy the great summer weekend. With Best Regards, Jyrki Kainulainen. From Holger.Steppke at team4m.de Fri Jul 6 11:45:48 2001 From: Holger.Steppke at team4m.de (Holger Steppke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) high packet loss In-Reply-To: <00a501c105eb$0cf94240$f6242cc7@istal.com> Message-ID: Hi, try the ethernet settings full/half duplex and see what works best for you. and include you Ethernetswitch, set them to the same values as the TNT is configured to. full-duplex on both sides harcoded configured should work, all other stuff will fail. Bye >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com >[mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Eric Larsen >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:13 AM >To: ascend-users@bungi.com >Subject: (ASCEND) high packet loss > > >I have approximately 120 connections running on a TNT through an >ethernet-2 >card on the 100M port. I am getting a high amount of packet loss. Is this >something on the network causing this, or is it on the TNT. Any >suggestions >on troubleshooting this problem? > >Eric Larsen >eric@istal.com > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Paul at ACVW.com Fri Jul 6 13:11:33 2001 From: Paul at ACVW.com (Paul M. Ledbetter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010706125732.0212de38@post.austintx.net> AHHH! I need some help with an Max 6000 connecting to a T1. I am used to PRI's Maxens so if these questions sound stupid, they probably are :-)) The scenario is this. On Tuesday a power outage knocked out a USR Total Control Box/two T1's. At first we believed that the TC box was bad, so we decided to put a MAX 6000 online to replace it. Called the local phone company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got Wink-Start, ESF, and B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think there is other info the MAX needs like a PRI setup does, but I am not sure. Some did say something about sending 4 digits on the calls, but no other info and I have no idea where that info would go.... I do get a LA note on the T1's when set up like this, so I am thinking that part is set up correctly. Now, when anyone calls the T1 number they hear a long pause and then a message saying all circuits are busy. Sometimes they hear 4 rings and then the message. On some instances I see a "r" on some of the channels, then a star with the message call connected in the status box, then a "c" (I have never seen that before now), but the caller never hears my modem. Can anyone tell me what they think may be the problem from the above description? I am at my wits end on this situation. I have had Bell out here and they have done everything to test the T1's and they say that the line is clean and good. They do say that they do not get a wink from my end when sending the call... I hope I am missing something simple, or anything.... Grrrr, I am loosing my hair (pulling it out slowly). Paul ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From RTabor at rocco.com Fri Jul 6 13:37:56 2001 From: RTabor at rocco.com (RTabor@rocco.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) dhcp relay problem Message-ID: <6C3DCF63C557D51188E600B0D0E1B4DC03B245@achilles.roccos.com> Hello. Forgive me if this has been covered -- I just joined the list and can't afford to spend anymore time scanning digests.... We're running 6.0.0 code on P50s and MAX1800s, and have discovered that DHCP requests with the "broadcast" flag set are being relayed by the Ascend units with the flag cleared. Older (Win95) clients don't set the flag, but Win2K clients do (for whatever reason), and now we're stuck with assigning static IPs to these boxes because they apparently can't receive unicast replies. Does anyone know if this has been fixed in a newer code release, or if it is even a known issue? Thanks, Richard Tabor Rocco, Inc. (540)568-1440 voice (540)568-1401 fax ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From skipmax at seacove.net Fri Jul 6 15:13:21 2001 From: skipmax at seacove.net (Dennis Duval) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010706125732.0212de38@post.austintx.net> Message-ID: <00f501c10658$1af77c00$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got Wink-Start, ESF, and > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think there is other I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave switch. I had to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try that instead of Wink-Start. Dennis Duval ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From skipmax at seacove.net Fri Jul 6 15:17:17 2001 From: skipmax at seacove.net (Dennis Duval) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 Message-ID: <010801c10658$a7ccf380$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got Wink-Start, ESF, and > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think there is other > > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave switch. I had > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try that instead > of Wink-Start. > Err, that should be "Inc-W-200". That's what I get for trusting my memory. Dennis ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Fri Jul 6 21:56:50 2001 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (netlink@netlinkcorp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010706125732.0212de38@post.austintx.net> <00f501c10658$1af77c00$0a01a8c0@seacove.net> Message-ID: <3B467A72.6616@netlinkcorp.com> Rob Ctl = Inc-W-200 and Clocking = Yes also might do the trick so that the local telco does the clocking. Do you have the signaling mode set to ISDN or Inband? If you have it set to Inband I believe you need to set it to ISDN. Hope this helps. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Dennis Duval wrote: > > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got Wink-Start, ESF, and > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think there is other > > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave switch. I had > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try that instead > of Wink-Start. > / ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sysop at worldnetoh.com Sat Jul 7 12:29:27 2001 From: sysop at worldnetoh.com (WNI System Administration) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Repairing Max 6000 Chassis Message-ID: I have two Max chassis that need some work. One doesn't power up - one day we turned it off, and it wouldn't turn back on. The 2nd has a fault light that stays on, and garbage on the console port. Anyone do this kind of work aside from Lucent? Thanks in advance. Rob System Administration (216) 561-9447 WorldNet Interactive http://worldnetoh.com From vsv at dnt.ro Sat Jul 7 06:53:35 2001 From: vsv at dnt.ro (Stefanita Vilcu) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: (RADIATOR) Strange accounting record Acct-Status-Type = Accounting-On In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote: > > Hello Stafanita - > > These are normal startup packets from a NAS after it reboots, but it > looks like you are not responding to them correctly. I suspect you > may not have a Client entry for this NAS in the Radiator > configuration file. Dear Hugh, You were right, there was my fault, I didn't configured the secret for accounting on the TNT. Now everythig is ok. Thank you. Stefanita -- Stefanita Valeriu Vilcu, vsv@dnt.ro Chief Technology Officer Dynamic Network Technologies, Romania Tel: +40-1-2106863 Fax: +40-1-3122745 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Jul 8 11:58:55 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 In-Reply-To: <3B467A72.6616@netlinkcorp.com> Message-ID: It's been nearly 6 years since I've had the (dis)pleasure of working with a CT1, but here's what I remember: As indicated by your telco, set your channelized T1 to Inband, wink-start, ESF, B8ZS. At this point, all 24 channels are up and in an idle state. You're seeing when a call comes in, but the other side is recieving an 'all circuits busy' message, which at this point, is being generated by your Max because it doesn't know what to do with the call. What you need to do, is to go through and make your slot assignments for each channel of the T1s to route the calls to an appropriate modem. If you have 16-mod modems, then you'll assign the first 16 channels to slot 3, the next 8 to slot 4. On the second T1, assign the first 8 channels to slot 4 and the last 16 channels to slot 5. AFAIK, only with ISDN/PRI can you leave the slot assignmentes to slot 0 for automatic call routing based on call type (analog or ISDN). -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** netlink@netlinkcorp.com ** Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:57 PM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 ** ** ** Rob Ctl = Inc-W-200 ** and Clocking = Yes also might do the trick ** so that the local telco does the clocking. ** Do you have the signaling mode set to ISDN or Inband? ** If you have it set to Inband I believe you need to set it to ISDN. ** ** Hope this helps. ** ------- ** R. Hall ** NET-LINK Corp. ** ** ** ** Dennis Duval wrote: ** > ** > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got ** Wink-Start, ESF, and ** > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think ** there is other ** > ** > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave ** switch. I had ** > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try ** that instead ** > of Wink-Start. ** > ** / ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Jul 8 17:02:42 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 In-Reply-To: <20010708170137.A23672@shofixti.kr4d.com> Message-ID: Hmm... that would take a little bit of the pain out of it, and definately worth a try. Again, it's been some 6 years since I've gotten to deal with CT1. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: Phil Bedard [mailto:philb@cyberlynk.net] ** Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 6:02 PM ** To: Troy Settle ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 ** ** ** I'm pretty sure you can just point them to the first modem ** card slot and ** the calls will roll over to the next modem card slot when that ** one fills up. ** That takes out a little bit of the pain of settings things up initially. ** ** Phil ** ** ** On Sun, 08 Jul 2001, Troy Settle wrote: ** ** > ** > It's been nearly 6 years since I've had the (dis)pleasure of ** working with a ** > CT1, but here's what I remember: ** > ** > As indicated by your telco, set your channelized T1 to Inband, ** wink-start, ** > ESF, B8ZS. At this point, all 24 channels are up and in an idle state. ** > You're seeing when a call comes in, but the other side is ** recieving an 'all ** > circuits busy' message, which at this point, is being ** generated by your Max ** > because it doesn't know what to do with the call. ** > ** > What you need to do, is to go through and make your slot ** assignments for ** > each channel of the T1s to route the calls to an appropriate ** modem. If you ** > have 16-mod modems, then you'll assign the first 16 channels ** to slot 3, the ** > next 8 to slot 4. On the second T1, assign the first 8 ** channels to slot 4 ** > and the last 16 channels to slot 5. ** > ** > AFAIK, only with ISDN/PRI can you leave the slot assignmentes ** to slot 0 for ** > automatic call routing based on call type (analog or ISDN). ** > ** > -- ** > Troy Settle ** > Pulaski Networks ** > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 ** > http://www.psknet.com ** > ** > ** > ** -----Original Message----- ** > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** > ** netlink@netlinkcorp.com ** > ** Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:57 PM ** > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** Rob Ctl = Inc-W-200 ** > ** and Clocking = Yes also might do the trick ** > ** so that the local telco does the clocking. ** > ** Do you have the signaling mode set to ISDN or Inband? ** > ** If you have it set to Inband I believe you need to set it to ISDN. ** > ** ** > ** Hope this helps. ** > ** ------- ** > ** R. Hall ** > ** NET-LINK Corp. ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** Dennis Duval wrote: ** > ** > ** > ** > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got ** > ** Wink-Start, ESF, and ** > ** > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think ** > ** there is other ** > ** > ** > ** > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave ** > ** switch. I had ** > ** > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try ** > ** that instead ** > ** > of Wink-Start. ** > ** > ** > ** / ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** > ** ** > ** ** > ** > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From philb at cyberlynk.net Sun Jul 8 17:01:37 2001 From: philb at cyberlynk.net (Phil Bedard) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 In-Reply-To: ; from troy@psknet.com on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 12:58:55PM -0400 References: <3B467A72.6616@netlinkcorp.com> Message-ID: <20010708170137.A23672@shofixti.kr4d.com> I'm pretty sure you can just point them to the first modem card slot and the calls will roll over to the next modem card slot when that one fills up. That takes out a little bit of the pain of settings things up initially. Phil On Sun, 08 Jul 2001, Troy Settle wrote: > > It's been nearly 6 years since I've had the (dis)pleasure of working with a > CT1, but here's what I remember: > > As indicated by your telco, set your channelized T1 to Inband, wink-start, > ESF, B8ZS. At this point, all 24 channels are up and in an idle state. > You're seeing when a call comes in, but the other side is recieving an 'all > circuits busy' message, which at this point, is being generated by your Max > because it doesn't know what to do with the call. > > What you need to do, is to go through and make your slot assignments for > each channel of the T1s to route the calls to an appropriate modem. If you > have 16-mod modems, then you'll assign the first 16 channels to slot 3, the > next 8 to slot 4. On the second T1, assign the first 8 channels to slot 4 > and the last 16 channels to slot 5. > > AFAIK, only with ISDN/PRI can you leave the slot assignmentes to slot 0 for > automatic call routing based on call type (analog or ISDN). > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > ** netlink@netlinkcorp.com > ** Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:57 PM > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 > ** > ** > ** Rob Ctl = Inc-W-200 > ** and Clocking = Yes also might do the trick > ** so that the local telco does the clocking. > ** Do you have the signaling mode set to ISDN or Inband? > ** If you have it set to Inband I believe you need to set it to ISDN. > ** > ** Hope this helps. > ** ------- > ** R. Hall > ** NET-LINK Corp. > ** > ** > ** > ** Dennis Duval wrote: > ** > > ** > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got > ** Wink-Start, ESF, and > ** > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think > ** there is other > ** > > ** > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave > ** switch. I had > ** > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try > ** that instead > ** > of Wink-Start. > ** > > ** / > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Sun Jul 8 21:56:46 2001 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (netlink@netlinkcorp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 References: Message-ID: <3B491D6E.F6D@netlinkcorp.com> That's correct. Set the initial modems to slot 3 and when you set up the entire pool the max will roll over to the next slot based on the number of modems in the pool setup. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Troy Settle wrote: > > Hmm... that would take a little bit of the pain out of it, and definately > worth a try. Again, it's been some 6 years since I've gotten to deal with > CT1. > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: Phil Bedard [mailto:philb@cyberlynk.net] > ** Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 6:02 PM > ** To: Troy Settle > ** Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 > ** > ** > ** I'm pretty sure you can just point them to the first modem > ** card slot and > ** the calls will roll over to the next modem card slot when that > ** one fills up. > ** That takes out a little bit of the pain of settings things up initially. > ** > ** Phil > ** > ** > ** On Sun, 08 Jul 2001, Troy Settle wrote: > ** > ** > > ** > It's been nearly 6 years since I've had the (dis)pleasure of > ** working with a > ** > CT1, but here's what I remember: > ** > > ** > As indicated by your telco, set your channelized T1 to Inband, > ** wink-start, > ** > ESF, B8ZS. At this point, all 24 channels are up and in an idle state. > ** > You're seeing when a call comes in, but the other side is > ** recieving an 'all > ** > circuits busy' message, which at this point, is being > ** generated by your Max > ** > because it doesn't know what to do with the call. > ** > > ** > What you need to do, is to go through and make your slot > ** assignments for > ** > each channel of the T1s to route the calls to an appropriate > ** modem. If you > ** > have 16-mod modems, then you'll assign the first 16 channels > ** to slot 3, the > ** > next 8 to slot 4. On the second T1, assign the first 8 > ** channels to slot 4 > ** > and the last 16 channels to slot 5. > ** > > ** > AFAIK, only with ISDN/PRI can you leave the slot assignmentes > ** to slot 0 for > ** > automatic call routing based on call type (analog or ISDN). > ** > > ** > -- > ** > Troy Settle > ** > Pulaski Networks > ** > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > ** > http://www.psknet.com > ** > > ** > > ** > ** -----Original Message----- > ** > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > ** > ** netlink@netlinkcorp.com > ** > ** Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:57 PM > ** > ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com > ** > ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and a T1 > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** Rob Ctl = Inc-W-200 > ** > ** and Clocking = Yes also might do the trick > ** > ** so that the local telco does the clocking. > ** > ** Do you have the signaling mode set to ISDN or Inband? > ** > ** If you have it set to Inband I believe you need to set it to ISDN. > ** > ** > ** > ** Hope this helps. > ** > ** ------- > ** > ** R. Hall > ** > ** NET-LINK Corp. > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** Dennis Duval wrote: > ** > ** > > ** > ** > > company (SWBell) for the T1 settings, but only got > ** > ** Wink-Start, ESF, and > ** > ** > > B8ZS for info on how to setup my end. Ok fine. I do think > ** > ** there is other > ** > ** > > ** > ** > I have some maxen hooked up to SW Bell and a Erickson slave > ** > ** switch. I had > ** > ** > to set my maxen to Wink-Inc-200 to get it to work. Might try > ** > ** that instead > ** > ** > of Wink-Start. > ** > ** > > ** > ** / > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > > ** > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jdrummond at cctsi.com Mon Jul 9 12:23:54 2001 From: jdrummond at cctsi.com (John Drummond) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Acculink Bandwidth Controller Message-ID: Greetings, Ascend users! Does anyone know what is (or if there is) a comperable product to the Acculink Bandwith Controller? I can't find any information on Avaya's web site on that product (whis is ca. 1995 or so). I'm doing this research for a customer who'd like something similar or better, but I am unfamiliar with video applications and associated hardware. Apparantly, my client is using the unit as a csu/dsu (it splits off some T-1 channels for a phone switch) and as an access concentrator for video. Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks, -John Drummond -- John Garnett Drummond, Systems Manager NTC Communications / Computer Cabling and Technology Services 961 Acorn Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22802 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tvendor at azweb.com Mon Jul 9 19:52:16 2001 From: tvendor at azweb.com (tim mcdonald) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT power supply chassis Message-ID: <3B4A51BF.A716F82C@azweb.com> We are liquidating our New York branch. Available for sale: TNT power supply chassis and other networking equipment. Please contact us for additional information. 718-727-9134 ADWISE USA, Inc. 380 Lexington, Suite 1700 New York, NY 10168 www.adwise.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From vbranyik at piopc.com Mon Jul 9 20:49:46 2001 From: vbranyik at piopc.com (Vilmos Branyik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Frame Relay question Message-ID: I'll apologize in advance for asking what may be a stupid question ..... I've been asked to replace some equipment that is not operating correctly on a Frame relay circuit. I have a Pipeline 130 and a Fastcomm Etherfrad to put on each end. I have set up the frame relay profile and what I thought was needed in the Pipeline but I am still not able to get the routers to communicate. So here are my questions: Will this setup even work or does there have to be some sort of special router at one end or the other? What about the DLCI number? I set it to 16 but does the number matter since I am the one setting it on both ends. Or should I contact the telco and find out what number to use? Is there some way I can hook up the 2 routers directly? I'm assuming I can't but thought I would ask anyway. Would I be better off putting another Pipeline 130 at the other end? I can get one if it would help. Thanks for any help you can provide. V. M. Branyik ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From justin at theglovesareoff.com Tue Jul 10 02:15:26 2001 From: justin at theglovesareoff.com (Justin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max TNT problems Message-ID: <026901c10910$17b5c640$876320d0@texinet.net> Recently went from max 6000's to a Max tnt with 48 port multi dsp cards. I am running on 9.0-159.0. When I user calls in with a modem all they get is a solid high pitch constant tone. This is my first attempt with a tnt, any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Justin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From denny at reiters.org Tue Jul 10 03:31:07 2001 From: denny at reiters.org (Dennis Reiter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max TNT problems In-Reply-To: <026901c10910$17b5c640$876320d0@texinet.net>; from justin@theglovesareoff.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:15:26AM -0500 References: <026901c10910$17b5c640$876320d0@texinet.net> Message-ID: <20010710033106.V47716@reiters.org> Quoting Justin (justin@theglovesareoff.com): > Recently went from max 6000's to a Max tnt with 48 port multi dsp cards. I > am running on 9.0-159.0. When I user calls in with a modem all they get is a > solid high pitch constant tone. This is my first attempt with a tnt, any > help would be appreciated. In the T1 profiles, set default-call-type = voice Denny -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org www.scapegoats.org If only closed minds came with closed mouths. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rwdozier at apex2000.net Tue Jul 10 09:14:59 2001 From: rwdozier at apex2000.net (Bob Dozier) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 7206 PVC entry template Message-ID: <001301c1094a$b3f51da0$154212cf@apex2000.net> ! pvc 5706690 2/34 encapsulation aal5mux ppp Virtual-Template1 ! pvc 5701234 2/35 encapsulation aal5mux ppp Virtual-Template1 ! pvc 6844321 2/36 encapsulation aal5mux ppp Virtual-Template1 ! _____________________________________________________________________ Bob Dozier rwdozier@apex2000.net Apex 2000 Internet Services Corporation Phone: (915) 570-1676 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ccook at tcworks.net Tue Jul 10 10:12:26 2001 From: ccook at tcworks.net (Chris Cook) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max TNT problems References: <026901c10910$17b5c640$876320d0@texinet.net> Message-ID: <3B4B1B5A.57BB8201@tcworks.net> Justin wrote: > > Recently went from max 6000's to a Max tnt with 48 port multi dsp cards. I > am running on 9.0-159.0. When I user calls in with a modem all they get is a > solid high pitch constant tone. This is my first attempt with a tnt, any > help would be appreciated. > Thanks, > Justin Sounds like the Rob Ctl or Framing may be set incorrectly... -- Chris o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | o-------------------------------------------------------------o ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From guido at ipa.net Tue Jul 10 10:32:12 2001 From: guido at ipa.net (Dave Montgomery) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) APX Password recovery In-Reply-To: <20010710033106.V47716@reiters.org> Message-ID: <000f01c10955$7e01c580$70c602cf@ipa.net> Let preface this with the lame but true disclaimer: I am asking for a friend. ---- How do you reset a lost password. My friend (really it's not me) has console access to the box but has lost his admin password (the only acct setup on it). Anybody know how to get around this, or where, specifically, that I can look for more info? Thanks. ---Dave ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From scott at aobe.com Tue Jul 10 15:25:13 2001 From: scott at aobe.com (Scott Starbuck) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Frame Relay question References: Message-ID: <3B4B64A9.B00DE16D@aobe.com> Hello Vilmos, Initially you can hook the units up back to back with a crossover cable to verify that your setup is working. The phone company will have to provide you with the DLCI numbers. For Frame Relay you are connecting to their equipment and they have a DLCI # on their end and your end has a DLCI #. If these are not correct it will not work. These are assigned by the telco and are something like 100 on one end and 101 on the other. (They have reversed these on me before on the initial setup) Now, if you have a point to point circuit and are not actually tapping into the Frame Relay cloud then I imagine you could assign your own. In this case it would seem that you would want to configure for T1 or Fractional T1 and DLCI #s are not required. I'm not familiar with the Fastcomm Etherfrad unit but we do use P130's and P220's in both Frame Relay and point to point T1 circuits. The DLCI was not an issue (doesn't use them) with the point to point T1 but definitely has to match the phone co. setup for the frame relay. I'd say a identical equipment on each end would help simplify things but may not be necessary. I believe I'd try and set them up as mentioned above with a crossover cable and see if you can get it working - that way it rules out any errors on the part of the telco - at least as a test to get things going initially. Hope this helps, good luck. Scott Starbuck Aobe Network Group 5340 Millertown Pike, Suite 131 Knoxville, TN 37924 phone: 865-689-7290 fax: 865-688-0068 e-mail: scott@aobe.com ---------------------- Vilmos Branyik wrote: > I'll apologize in advance for asking what may be a stupid question ..... > > I've been asked to replace some equipment that is not operating correctly on > a Frame relay circuit. I have a Pipeline 130 and a Fastcomm Etherfrad to put > on each end. I have set up the frame relay profile and what I thought was > needed in the Pipeline but I am still not able to get the routers to > communicate. > > So here are my questions: > > Will this setup even work or does there have to be some sort of special > router at one end or the other? > > What about the DLCI number? I set it to 16 but does the number matter since > I am the one setting it on both ends. Or should I contact the telco and find > out what number to use? > > Is there some way I can hook up the 2 routers directly? I'm assuming I can't > but thought I would ask anyway. > > Would I be better off putting another Pipeline 130 at the other end? I can > get one if it would help. > > Thanks for any help you can provide. > > V. M. Branyik > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From scott at scottwishard.com Tue Jul 10 19:36:57 2001 From: scott at scottwishard.com (Scott Wishard) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PIpe 50 & 75 Password reset Message-ID: I need some help in getting the full access password reset on a Pipe 50 & 75. both are late models with the 8.0-101.0 load. Reflashing with the current load or reflashing with a "lower" load didn't do the trick. I can get to the debug prompt using the jumper, but cannot get to the diagnostic mode to do a 'nvr' from the menu system. Any suggestions???? Scott Wishard From ms at polbox.pl Wed Jul 11 01:19:56 2001 From: ms at polbox.pl (Maciej Starski) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PIpe 50 & 75 Password reset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: If you know community you can do this by SecureConnect Manager (SNMP) ------------------------------------------ Maciej Starski mailto:ms@polbox.pl From mills at albacom.net Wed Jul 11 03:30:52 2001 From: mills at albacom.net (Tony Mills) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT: Multicast Questions Message-ID: <3B4C0EBC.EE09769A@albacom.net> Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could help me with a few quick questions regarding multicast support on TNTs. I'm new to the list, so apologies if these questions have been asked before... 1) Performance: Has anyone seen any performance problems with multicast on a loaded TNT? What would be the impact on performance if hundreds of dial-up users all join the same group (say a 40kbps video stream)? Would this situation hit performance more or less than if you had many streams each with only a few users? Any experience that anyone could share on these aspects would be very welcome... 2) Multilink PPP: I don't beleive multicast fowarding is supported on multilink PPP sessions (at least on our TNTs with 8.0.4), either (a) when all the sub-sessions terminate on the same box, or (b) when they terminate on different boxes in the same PoP ('stacking'). Has anyone else tried it and got different results? Thanks in advance for your thoughts... Tony. -- Tony Mills mills@albacom.net ------------+=+------------ Albacom SpA - Roma - Italia From Holger.Steppke at team4m.de Tue Jul 10 16:04:34 2001 From: Holger.Steppke at team4m.de (Holger Steppke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:54 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX TNT and at commands for the modem server Message-ID: Hi, do someone knows the valid AT commands that i can use during a connect via TCP to a modem from the pool/server that i can configure in the terminal-server settings? I can us the modem to dial out as an anlogue call with "atdt12345" but im looking for commands where i can force the TNT to do an ISDN call ... should be possible as the modems can do both anyway. kind regards ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From max_and_tnt at hotmail.com Wed Jul 11 13:55:03 2001 From: max_and_tnt at hotmail.com (Joe Max) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Acculink Bandwidth Controller Message-ID: Ascend used to have a MAX model called "Multiband" that was able to perform exactly what you want. Besides that, most MAXes can do drop-and-insert provided the T1 lines are CT1: it will not work with PRIs. >From: John Drummond >To: "ascend-users@bungi.com" >Subject: (ASCEND) Acculink Bandwidth Controller >Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:23:54 -0500 > > >Greetings, Ascend users! > >Does anyone know what is (or if there is) a comperable >product to the Acculink Bandwith Controller? I can't >find any information on Avaya's web site on that product >(whis is ca. 1995 or so). I'm doing this research for >a customer who'd like something similar or better, but >I am unfamiliar with video applications and associated >hardware. Apparantly, my client is using the unit as a >csu/dsu (it splits off some T-1 channels for a phone >switch) and as an access concentrator for video. > >Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated! > >Thanks, >-John Drummond >-- >John Garnett Drummond, Systems Manager >NTC Communications / >Computer Cabling and Technology Services >961 Acorn Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22802 > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From max_and_tnt at hotmail.com Wed Jul 11 14:06:56 2001 From: max_and_tnt at hotmail.com (Joe Max) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) APX Password recovery Message-ID: I hope you had saved your configuration because you are going to need to blow it. Ascend equipment doesn't allow resetting of the password: you need to blow the whole config using a procedure called "nindy". Search the archives for the procedure. >From: "Dave Montgomery" >To: >Subject: (ASCEND) APX Password recovery >Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:32:12 -0500 > >Let preface this with the lame but true disclaimer: I am asking for a >friend. >---- >How do you reset a lost password. My friend (really it's not me) has >console access to the box but has lost his admin password (the only acct >setup on it). Anybody know how to get around this, or where, >specifically, that I can look for more info? > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sysop at worldnetoh.com Wed Jul 11 15:19:48 2001 From: sysop at worldnetoh.com (WNI System Administration) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Lmodem shared memory failure message Message-ID: We are having a problem with some 16mod cards. Their various Max 6096 and Max 4000 chassis power up ok, but we're itermitantly getting "not available" or "slot empty" messages. The strange part is that these messages only occur when a certain card is in a certain slot. The diagnostic error is: Lmodem: Shared memory failure byte at ##### was 00(00) expected 07 or sometimes the 00(00) is 23(23). Any help on this one? Thanks, Rob mailto:rjb@worldnetoh.com From max_and_tnt at hotmail.com Wed Jul 11 14:02:06 2001 From: max_and_tnt at hotmail.com (Joe Max) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX TNT and at commands for the modem server Message-ID: If by "ISDN call" you mean a digital call, no, you can't do that from Immediate Modem (ie, telnet to port 5000). Immediate Modem is an asynchronous service. There is no framing, etc. which is required for digital calls. The specific AT commands supported depend on the modem card and the specific code release. Don't know where to obtain that info though other than asking Lucent's TAC. >From: "Holger Steppke" >To: >Subject: (ASCEND) MAX TNT and at commands for the modem server >Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:04:34 +0200 > >Hi, > >do someone knows the valid AT commands that i can use during a connect via >TCP to a modem from the pool/server that i can configure in the >terminal-server settings? > >I can us the modem to dial out as an anlogue call with "atdt12345" but im >looking for commands where i can force the TNT to do an ISDN call ... >should be possible as the modems can do both anyway. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Jul 11 13:48:35 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX TNT and at commands for the modem server Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030B80@trinidadmover.solunet.com> Here is an excellent resource for AT commands for Lucent modems. Not only does it give the commands but a good explanation for what they do, what the readout is, and how to use them to troubleshoot modems. If you are looking to call via ISDN, the TNT uses HDLC drivers for digital calls.......not sure if you can use modems for this or if it is possible to "open" HDLC drivers for outgoing calls. http://www.lucent.com/micro/K56flex/v90atcom.pdf David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Holger Steppke [mailto:Holger.Steppke@team4m.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 5:05 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) MAX TNT and at commands for the modem server Hi, do someone knows the valid AT commands that i can use during a connect via TCP to a modem from the pool/server that i can configure in the terminal-server settings? I can us the modem to dial out as an anlogue call with "atdt12345" but im looking for commands where i can force the TNT to do an ISDN call ... should be possible as the modems can do both anyway. kind regards ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From guido at ipa.net Wed Jul 11 17:08:43 2001 From: guido at ipa.net (Dave Montgomery) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 6000 and POST Failure 14 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <001601c10a56$0dbf2360$70c602cf@ipa.net> I have a Max 6000 which begins to boot but halts during POST with the message Failure (14). I know that this indicates a hardware failure but does anybody know which hardware has failed? Or has anybody had this happen and managed to resolve it? Ofcourse, I realize that Lucent would prefer I send it to them along with a ridiculously large check to cover repairs, but I'd rather take my chances than feed the wolves. Thanks. ---Dave ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MLuetjen at ABCimaging.com Thu Jul 12 06:50:47 2001 From: MLuetjen at ABCimaging.com (Matthew Luetjen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Password recovery Message-ID: Does anyone know how to reset a supervisor password? I have an Ascend MAX and it rebooted onto an old config. No one knows the old password. I have direct access to the console port, but cannot get into supervisor mode. Anyone know how to get in? Thanks Matt ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at mi-web.com Thu Jul 12 10:53:03 2001 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000 Flash Card Message-ID: Hi there. We just bought a used Max 6000, but it came without the PCMCIA Flash Card. I'm having one heck of a time tracking one down. Any suggestions where I can order/get one? Also, There is no DRAM card. When I called the Lucent folks (finally getting to the people who deal with the Ascend equipment), the gal I spoke with, at first, didn't know what I was referring to. She was later told that this card is not really necessary, but the 8 Meg Flash card is. Does this sound right? I thought I could find on at CompUSA, but all they carry now are the little ones that are used in digital cameras and such. I'd love to find one in the Detroit area so I could just go pick it up, but any reference to where I can order one would be fine, too. I was given these numbers on the item... Model #: MX60-Flash-8MB Com Code: 407930056 Thanks for any help. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at mi-web.com Thu Jul 12 12:52:57 2001 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 6000 Flash Card -- OK for now. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I would like to thank the people who have replied off-list about this. I think I'm in good shape for now. I seemed to have bumped into a combination of things that steered me in this direction. The first thing that wasn't clear is that my steady fault light was because I didn't have the machine at the co-lo, which meant that I didn't have any PRI lines inserted. I was assuming that it was because I didn't have the flash card in. What messed me up secondly is that I thought I was using a null modem cable to get in and configure it, but it turns out that I must be using a straight through. I'll correct that this afternoon. Since I couldn't connect with a terminal program through it, I assumed that is was because of the steady fault light and no card. I guess what they say about assuming really is true. Especially the "out of me" part. :-) I do appreciate all the help. Especially to Dana, who hooked my up with a live person that steered me straight. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jbushman at mwci.net Thu Jul 12 13:48:52 2001 From: jbushman at mwci.net (Jeremy Bushman) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000 Radius issue Message-ID: Hi all- We recently changed IP's of our radius servers and I have one Max that is not playing the game anymore. All we did was change the IP address of the Auth Host 1 and Auth Host 2. The secret hast not changed. I have one Max that just repeats over and over "LAN security error" and disconnects the call. I see in our radius logs that the user appears to be getting authenticated fine. I've double and triple checked everything on our radius server, I know the Secret's are the same... Anyone have any suggestions on things to check on the Max? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------- Jeremy Bushman (Voice) 563-557-8463 Network Operations Center MidWest Communications, Inc. 241 Main St. noc@mwci.net Dubuque, IA 52001 jbushman@mwci.net ---------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Jul 13 03:50:43 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 6000 Radius issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Jeremy, You'll likely need to look at the output of radif on the max, and run your radius server in debug mode to see what's going on. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeremy Bushman ** Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:49 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Max 6000 Radius issue ** ** ** Hi all- ** ** We recently changed IP's of our radius servers and I have one Max that is ** not playing the game anymore. ** ** All we did was change the IP address of the Auth Host 1 and Auth Host ** 2. The secret hast not changed. I have one Max that just repeats over and ** over "LAN security error" and disconnects the call. I see in our radius ** logs that the user appears to be getting authenticated fine. ** ** I've double and triple checked everything on our radius server, ** I know the ** Secret's are the same... Anyone have any suggestions on things ** to check on ** the Max? ** ** Thanks. ** ** ---------------------------------------------------- ** Jeremy Bushman (Voice) 563-557-8463 ** Network Operations Center ** MidWest Communications, Inc. ** 241 Main St. noc@mwci.net ** Dubuque, IA 52001 jbushman@mwci.net ** ---------------------------------------------------- ** ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dave at mi-web.com Fri Jul 13 09:30:29 2001 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild Message-ID: Hi there. On our Max 4048 the radius accounting is sending multiple entries for each call. Most calls will have at least 6 repeats any entry, and I've seen as many as 21 "start" entries and 21 "stop" entries for the same call. I've been able to get in and shut it off, but can't see (or make sense of) what might cause these repeats. Each entry is time stamped every 10 to 20 seconds apart. I'll be setting up another server (primarily a web server) to handle the accounting messages to see if the same thing happens, but I have to get the Radius running on it. However, I'm wondering if anyone has any immediate idea what may cause this (have you seen it yourself?). Also, I'm wondering if the time stamp is sent from the Max along with the accounting message or if it's stamped by Radius when the message is received. This may shed some light on the subject. I'm pretty sure that the message is being sent repeatedly, as opposed to being written over and over by Radius itself, because our (now pulled out) TNT ran single entries, as do our couple of non-Ascend units. Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From maillist1 at argontech.net Fri Jul 13 10:52:18 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild References: Message-ID: <008801c10bb3$d632f5c0$3301fe8a@argontech.net> I don't know about the 4048, but our 6096s have a setting that duplicates the radius logging. Call logging under Ethernet > Mod Config > Call Logging Set Call Loggin to NO. Hope it helps... this one drove me nuts for a couple of days. Marco <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Higgins" To: "Ascend Users" Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:30 AM Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild > Hi there. > > On our Max 4048 the radius accounting is sending multiple entries for each > call. Most calls will have at least 6 repeats any entry, and I've seen as > many as 21 "start" entries and 21 "stop" entries for the same call. > > I've been able to get in and shut it off, but can't see (or make sense of) > what might cause these repeats. Each entry is time stamped every 10 to 20 > seconds apart. > > I'll be setting up another server (primarily a web server) to handle the > accounting messages to see if the same thing happens, but I have to get the > Radius running on it. > > However, I'm wondering if anyone has any immediate idea what may cause this > (have you seen it yourself?). Also, I'm wondering if the time stamp is sent > from the Max along with the accounting message or if it's stamped by Radius > when the message is received. This may shed some light on the subject. > > I'm pretty sure that the message is being sent repeatedly, as opposed to > being written over and over by Radius itself, because our (now pulled out) > TNT ran single entries, as do our couple of non-Ascend units. > > Dave. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jalvarez at prw.net Sat Jul 14 12:28:08 2001 From: jalvarez at prw.net (Jesus Alvarez) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DNIS on Ch T1's Message-ID: We have one city serviced by a block of 28 channelized T1's handled by TotalControl 1000 and Max 6000 NASes. The CLEC sends us 7 digits on calls. The digits are passed correctly on the Radius Called-Station-ID paramenter by the TotalControl boxes . On the Maxes we we only get two (incorrect) digits on the Called-Station-ID . The channelized T1's are configured with: Rob Ctl=Inc-W-200 Collect DNIS/ANI=Yes Is there a setting for the Max to get the digits correctly on channelized T1's ? These Maxes use software 7.0.22 but upgraded one to 9.0.3 as a test and saw the same symptoms. With 9.0.3 changing the new "Interdigit Timeout" made the number of digits go betwwen 2,1,0 or fast busy. Thanks. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rwheeler at ced.uvm.edu Tue Jul 17 11:56:24 2001 From: rwheeler at ced.uvm.edu (Richard Wheeler) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] VSX BRI wont boot Message-ID: <3B546E34.C1FE6C41@ced.uvm.edu> I have a Multiband VSX BRI that sat for too long and apparently lost its memory: It gets stuck in the boot and gives the warning: Power on self-test halted. CONFIGURE UNIT Tryed reloading4.5cp6 and still get warning. How do I reset this unit? Dont think there is a hardware problem. just unplugged for too long. rwheeler@ced.uvm.edu From dave at mi-web.com Tue Jul 17 17:16:14 2001 From: dave at mi-web.com (Dave Higgins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild In-Reply-To: <008801c10bb3$d632f5c0$3301fe8a@argontech.net> Message-ID: On 7/13/01 11:52 AM, Marco C. Coelho wrote: > I don't know about the 4048, but our 6096s have a setting that duplicates > the radius logging. Call logging under Ethernet > Mod Config > Call Logging > Set Call Loggin to NO. Finally got the time to check this one out. Call logging is set to "no". All options "N/A". Anyone else? Dave. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Jul 17 18:30:54 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild Message-ID: Hi Dave, There are a couple of issues which might be coming up: if the RTT for the Accounting-Request,Accounting-Accept \ (packet types 0x4 and 0x5) is similar to the timeout parameter set in ethernet>mod config>Accounting then you will get repeated packets sent out from the MAX. Please take into account that this includes the processing time on the RADIUS serverm (certain servers may queue or discard radius requests at busy times). Extend the timeout on the MAX so that in normal operations the timeout is never reached. Also, if there is packet loss on the network, then the Accounting-Accepts will continue to be sent until one is received by the MAX, which it likes. There may be some problems if the RADIUS server does not have a matching clients file entry for the MAX's accounting key (regenerate the clients file, and re-enter the parameter in the MAX). If there is a problem after that you could try an alternative RADIUS server, and test with that (many free trials are available). If the problem still exists the problem is not likely to be the RADIUS server... Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Higgins [mailto:dave@mi-web.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 8:16 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 Radius Gone Wild > > > On 7/13/01 11:52 AM, Marco C. Coelho wrote: > > > I don't know about the 4048, but our 6096s have a setting > that duplicates > > the radius logging. Call logging under Ethernet > Mod > Config > Call Logging > > Set Call Loggin to NO. > > Finally got the time to check this one out. Call logging is > set to "no". All > options "N/A". > > Anyone else? > > Dave. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Daniel.Kurucz at varetis.de Wed Jul 18 04:17:01 2001 From: Daniel.Kurucz at varetis.de (Daniel.Kurucz@varetis.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:55 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Setting fault tolerance on MAX Message-ID: Hi all, we have bought some time ago a MAX2k, with modem-extension card (MX-12MOD-S56). We are using the TServ option too, for dialing out to some customers, who don't have ISDN lines. Our problem is, that some of our customers have very bad lines, sometimes it is very hard to connect, even if we can connect, it is only possible on 9600, sometimes 4800 baud. But MAX kills the line after using it 4-5 minutes, the log says there were too many errors on the line. Calling the same line of the customer with an older Shiva LanRover modemserver, it works very fine, the line is up 'till wedecide to end the session... It is not only one case, this is tested since 2 weeks. The problem is, we won't use Shiva anymore... So, the question is, how to set maximum fault tolerance with MAX 2k ? Thanx in advance : Daniel ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From emad.anis at link.net Wed Jul 18 04:14:14 2001 From: emad.anis at link.net (Emad Anis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) modem utilization Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 3957 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010718/e319d6cf/attachment.gif From rydrcom at yahoo.com Wed Jul 18 08:27:09 2001 From: rydrcom at yahoo.com (Ryder Communications) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend TNT Message-ID: <20010718132709.53236.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> Hello everyone, Please forgive me if this email is inappropriate, but I have some Ascend TNT equipment for sale and was hoping someone could point me to somewhere that I could post it available for sale. I'm sorry for any inconvenience, and appreciate your time. Regards, Brian Braisted RYDER Communications, Inc. Wide Area Networking Solutions 35B Wilson Drive Sparta, NJ 07871-3427 Tel. 973-940-7350 / 1-877-RYDRCOM x227 FAX. 973-940-7355 / 1-877-RYDRFAX brian@rydrcom.com www.rydrcom.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jcdutton at lucent.com Wed Jul 18 11:26:21 2001 From: jcdutton at lucent.com (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 6000 Radius issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I few questions: - 1) Which Radius server? 2) Are the shared Radius secrets the same on the NAS and the RADIUS server? 3) Can the Radius server ping the IP address that the NAS is sending packets from? 4) Duplicate IP address ? It looks like the NAS is sending accounting packets to the radius server. The radius server logs them, then sends a response. The response is either not getting back, or the shared secret does not match. So the NAS resends them. Cheers James > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeremy Bushman > Sent: 12 July 2001 19:49 > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Max 6000 Radius issue > > > Hi all- > > We recently changed IP's of our radius servers and I have one Max that is > not playing the game anymore. > > All we did was change the IP address of the Auth Host 1 and Auth Host > 2. The secret hast not changed. I have one Max that just repeats over and > over "LAN security error" and disconnects the call. I see in our radius > logs that the user appears to be getting authenticated fine. > > I've double and triple checked everything on our radius server, I know the > Secret's are the same... Anyone have any suggestions on things to check on > the Max? > > Thanks. > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Jeremy Bushman (Voice) 563-557-8463 > Network Operations Center > MidWest Communications, Inc. > 241 Main St. noc@mwci.net > Dubuque, IA 52001 jbushman@mwci.net > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Wed Jul 18 18:49:38 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) modem utilization Message-ID: Hello Emad Anis, Do you want the negotiated data rates for the modems, or the current utilization passing through the modem? Im not sure about individual capabilites of NA5.0, but There will probably be interface counters for each WAN interface in the SNMP mibs, which can be correlated to individual sessions (just a guess though). Your Lucent Reseller may be able to help you with that sort of information. Addiditonally, the AccessPoint router does traffic shaping and can provide real time graphs of data going through it, on a per IP address or IP address Range basis. (very pretty, may not be what you're after though). If you just want the negotiated rates on the modem connections, the default userstat command on the tnt will show this for current users. NavisAccess May be able to create a negotiation rate over time graph with its call logging. Greg -----Original Message----- From: Emad Anis [mailto:emad.anis@link.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:14 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) modem utilization Hi All I'm asking about if it's applicable to use the Navis Access to measure the bandwidth utilization for each modem in Max TNT ? or can we read that by anyway ? . thx in advance Emad Anis DataCommunication Engineer LINKdotNET E-mail: emad.anis@link.net Web: www.link.net Tel.: +202 3367711 Fax: +202 3364910 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From geoffw at v-site.net Thu Jul 19 02:12:18 2001 From: geoffw at v-site.net (Geoff White) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Looking for a code update for MAX1800 & P130 In-Reply-To: <200107190545.WAA01857@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010719000739.04e25198@mail.v-site.net> Can anyone tell me where I can get some firmware updates for my aging MAX1800 and my Pipeline 130s I anm currently running 6.0.4 on the MAX1800 and 6.1.43 on the pipelines. Also it would be nice if I could unlock secure firewall on my remaining pipelines, they still work great as a quick deployment router for events and I'd like to get them updated if possible before they are completely EoLed (End of Life). Geoffw ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jul 19 02:38:46 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Looking for a code update for MAX1800 & P130 Message-ID: ftp://ftp.ascend.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff White [mailto:geoffw@v-site.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 5:12 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Looking for a code update for MAX1800 & P130 > > > > Can anyone tell me where I can get some firmware updates for > my aging MAX1800 > and my Pipeline 130s I anm currently running 6.0.4 on the MAX1800 > and 6.1.43 on the pipelines. > Also it would be nice if I could unlock secure firewall on my > remaining > pipelines, they still work great as a quick deployment router > for events > and I'd like to get them updated if possible before they are > completely > EoLed (End of Life). > > > Geoffw > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From alessandro.chiolo at it.easynet.net Thu Jul 19 03:56:48 2001 From: alessandro.chiolo at it.easynet.net (Alessandro Chiolo) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT SNMP OIDs Message-ID: <01a001c11030$bed8fa10$c6e016d9@it.easynet.net> I'd like to use SNMP to monitor various aspects of my TNT, like DS0 and modem usage (both global and per-PRI), cpu, ram, users, lan traffic, etc, but i couldn't find any documentation on it. do anyone already have the relevant OIDs? regards, A.Chiolo -- Alessandro Chiolo Network Manager, Easynet Italy "I'm Winston Wolf, I solve Problems." ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Thu Jul 19 18:30:07 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT SNMP OIDs Message-ID: ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/MaxTNT/9.0.X/9.0.3/MIBS/ These are the latest set of MIBs free for download. Previous versions are available under subdirectories associated with the version of code required. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Alessandro Chiolo [mailto:alessandro.chiolo@it.easynet.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:57 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT SNMP OIDs > > > I'd like to use SNMP to monitor various aspects of my TNT, > like DS0 and > modem usage (both global and per-PRI), cpu, ram, users, lan > traffic, etc, > but i couldn't find any documentation on it. do anyone > already have the > relevant OIDs? > > regards, > A.Chiolo > > -- > Alessandro Chiolo > Network Manager, Easynet Italy > "I'm Winston Wolf, I solve Problems." > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From chris at areti.co.uk Fri Jul 20 02:34:44 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) NAT on Pipeline 75 - how does it decide which to use? Message-ID: <20010720083444.A1369@areti.co.uk> I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 which I use to connect a small (SoHo) network to the Internet. I have accounts with two or three ISPs so havea number of connection profiles set up. I just have a single NAT profile (this is software version 8.1 with multiple NAT profiles) which all the connection profiles use. If more than one Connection profile is set to 'active' how does the Pipeline decide which connection to use when a computer requests a connection and it autodials? It would be nice if I could make it try the unmetered accounts first and, only if these fail, try the one that costs money. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From chris at areti.co.uk Fri Jul 20 02:42:30 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DNS when using Pipeline 75 Message-ID: <20010720084230.B1369@areti.co.uk> A second question re my Pipeline 75 on a SoHo network. Is there a simple way to change the DNS servers that the computers on my network use according to the ISP the Ascend has decided to connect to? Or, even more relevant, when the ISP provides the IP address(es) of its DNS server(s) 'dynamically' (i.e. at connection time) how can you transfer these to the computers connected via the Ascend? Each connection profile has its own DNS addresses and these can either be 'static' (if you know them) or they can be set up by the ISP when the connection is made. However this is a pretty pointless exercise as far as I can see as all it enables is the use of DNS lookup from the Ascend itself. What I need to be able to do is to transfer thse connection profile DNS addresses to the computers using the Ascend as and when each connection profile is in use. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Fri Jul 20 07:48:03 2001 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT and MPP Message-ID: Hello all, I have only one customer that seems to be trying to MPP (not MP) and they always get the following error message: Failed to receive a NULL MP message He can get one channel up without a problem, but once he tries to bring the second channel online the lines (all of them) hang up. Here are my MPP settings in ANSWER-DEFAULTS [in ANSWER-DEFAULTS:mpp-answer] enabled = yes dynamic-algorithm = quadratic bandwidth-monitor-direction = transmit increment-channel-count = 1 decrement-channel-count = 1 seconds-history = 15 add-persistence = 5 sub-persistence = 10 target-utilization = 70 They are the default that the TAOS is set for. Any thoughts or ideas on what this problem could be. To the best of my knowledge none of my other customers use MPP, but pleanty use MP and have no problems. I know he is using a Diamond Shotgun modem and he is a user we acquired from an ISP purchase. They used Ascend 6000's and he had no problem with them. I have MaxTNT's with the new 96 port DSP modem cards. Thanks! -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sewe at online.no Fri Jul 20 07:51:05 2001 From: sewe at online.no (Daniel Sewe) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) nonStandardData in MAX VoIP implementation -> Lucent MVAM Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010720143342.0286db40@online.no> Hi all :) (I hope my questions are appropriate for this list) I am testing various other vendors VoIP products for integration in a Lucent VoIP network which is populated by MAX 6000's, and have discovered that Lucent Multivoice Access Manager (MVAM) does not like other vendors products to much. * All other vendors gateways appear as 96 port gateways on the licence screen of MVAM. The MAX'es report the correct no of licenses, so I suspect it is related to nonStandardData sent in the RAS RRQ message passed by TAOS to the MVAM. * All calls from other vendors gateways are logged as "incomplete" in the call log, even though the call is definately successful (event log also contains correct messages for setup/takedown of the call) I hope that someone out there has an overview of the nonStandardData that the TAOS is sending and is willing to share that information. I have searched the web, but can only find info for other vendors - not Lucent! It would be interresting if someone knows what kind of nonStandardData the 3.x of MVAM understands. Tia all! Best regards, -/Daniel Sewe/- "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another which states that this has already happened." ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dgravell at lucent.com Fri Jul 20 16:34:09 2001 From: dgravell at lucent.com (David Gravelle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Second user needs question Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20010720143409.008eb820@baron.eng.ascend.com> Dear friends, As part of our mission to communicate complete, accurate, timely, and easy-to-use information, the User Needs Evaluation Team is conducting quick, one-question surveys of Lucent Integrated Network Solutions documentation users. Thanks to those of you who responded to our first message. Your responses helped assure us that learning about you and how you use our TAOS products' technical documentation will help improve it. Here is our second user needs question: In the Lucent manuals you use most frequently, which of the following book features do you use to find information? * Main table of contents * Chapter table of contents * Electronic search for keywords * Scanning section titles * Index * Reference * Glossary Please respond to usabilityins@lucent.com, our new team alias, with your answer. In your email, please also let us know if you (or your organization) would like to participate in further user needs evaluation efforts such as our full (15 minutes) User Needs survey. Rest assured that this survey question is not an evaluation of you or your skills. Your answers will be tabulated anonymously and used only to help us understand the knowledge and experience of users in general. Sincerely, David Gravelle and The User Needs Evaluation Team Lucent Integrated Network Solutions Technical Communication ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From roddy at staff.satlink.com.au Tue Jul 24 18:57:49 2001 From: roddy at staff.satlink.com.au (Roddy Strachan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:56 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Error 650 Message-ID: <00fe01c1149c$71f4b200$1e00a8c0@glasgowrangers.com.tj> Hi, Anyone on the list know why this problem exists within Windows DUN? Ive done a fair bit of research, scouring the web/newsgroups etc, and it sounds like : A. Corrupted DUN B. Corrupted Network protocols TCP etc C. Combination of bad lines/bad modem In the case of points A & B, a simple un-install DUN/TCP-IP fixes the problem A report from the tech guys last night, said they had about 10 people in a row with this problem, surely this just isn't co-incidental ??? Could it also be put down to the access servers (we are using Lucent Max 3000's and 6000's).. Any help greatly appreciated. --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From j4k3 at yahoo.com Wed Jul 25 02:22:41 2001 From: j4k3 at yahoo.com (Jake Schneider) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX 2012 IP Routing/Radius debacle Message-ID: <001b01c114da$9787a5c0$75e6f018@computer> Hello, I have installed a MAX 2012 on a PRI and have installed Windows NT RADIUS. (The version with the NT 4.0 option pack.) I can authenticate just fine, but there seems to be a problem with DHCP/IP Pool/Routing. The MAX assigns the correct address to the client, but no route entry ever gets made for wan0, in addition I issue a >show ip pool and it indicates that all of the IP addresses are free! The client gets all the correct IP information such as IP/Subnet DNS and WINS, but can't ping a blessed thing on my LAN. I looked high and low for information on wether the client needs a source route built but to no avail. I am using the default Answer profile for all my dial in clients, and have configured a pool of just 6 tiny addresses. I feel I have a routing issue because RADIUS is actually doing it's job authing the remote clients. But I have a lingering suspiscion that the source route info for my clients somehow needs to be defined in RADIUS. (I have 3 skimpy definitions in RADIUS) I've had experience getting a Shiva D56 running with the Shiva Auth Kit before, but I never envisioned such difficulty with just simple 6 modem dial in. If anyone could push me in the right direction I would be greatly appreciative. I can supply oodles of configuration information if you desire. Jake Schneider j4k3@yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010725/0349c1c6/attachment.html From santiago at unicauca.edu.co Wed Jul 25 09:51:54 2001 From: santiago at unicauca.edu.co (santiago j ruano r.) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 Message-ID: hi! i'm new on this list do you know where i can find the taos 9.0-159 or 9.1 for the max 6000? i want the v.92 support thanks, santiago ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Jul 25 11:14:02 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030BDF@trinidadmover.solunet.com> ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/Release-9.1.X/9.1.0 - Read the "Read Me" file There is no 9.0.159 available. Here is the link for 9.0.154 : ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/Release-9.0.X/9.0-154.0/ David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: santiago j ruano r. [mailto:santiago@unicauca.edu.co] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:52 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 hi! i'm new on this list do you know where i can find the taos 9.0-159 or 9.1 for the max 6000? i want the v.92 support thanks, santiago ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From maillist1 at argontech.net Wed Jul 25 11:21:50 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 References: Message-ID: <00bc01c11525$f3846d40$3301fe8a@argontech.net> I believe your modems have to be able to support it as well. The older (1yr) digital modems won't go v.92. They are supposed to have some trade in program, but I haven't seen it yet. So far, the v92 reports from fellow ISPs are rather negative. Marco <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "santiago j ruano r." To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:51 AM Subject: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 > hi! i'm new on this list > > > do you know where i can find the taos 9.0-159 or 9.1 for the max 6000? > i want the v.92 support > > thanks, > > santiago > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sgarcia at tid.es Wed Jul 25 06:14:52 2001 From: sgarcia at tid.es (Silvia Garcia Nieto) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX3000, Radius and CBCP Message-ID: <3B5EAA2C.27A2C917@tid.es> Hi, I'm trying to configure a MAX3000 for callback with CBCP. It works when the connection is made for a local profile but we need RADIUS authentication. I have tried several configurations but it doesn?t work anyway. The RADIUS server authenticates and the MAX hangs the call but I can?t make the MAX dial out to establish the connection. Can you help me? Thank?s -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sgarcia.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: Card for Silvia Garcia Nieto Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010725/60f0415d/sgarcia.vcf From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Jul 25 15:05:48 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030BE1@trinidadmover.solunet.com> Hi Tom, Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything deployed regarding Ascend boxes running V.92. I have heard a lot of 'stories' about it but nothing first-hand. I do know that you will need Multi-DSP cards along with the 9.1 software. Here is the latest info I have on Lucent's V.92 plans..... * V.92 is supported on the MultiDSP cards (both the 48 and 96 port), but not for Series56 (I, II, or III) modem cards. * For TNT customers, you will need the 96MultiDSP cards. * V.92 will be part of TAOS 9.1 (first 2 pieces: QuickConnect and Modem-on-Hold) targeting for 4/01, V.44 shortly after, the last piece (PCM upstream) in Q4CY01. * V.92 is a sw upgrade and will not need a hash code. However, it will be introduced in TAOS 9.1, and there is a charge for base TAOS starting 9.1, there will be a fee for 9.1 TAOS. So in short, you will not be able to try it for free. I have not seen any deployments where I can gauge how well it works. Regards, David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: ISPstuff [mailto:tom@ispstuff.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:27 PM To: DPascarella@solunet.com Subject: RE: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 David, I am more interested in the TNT 9.1.x. I am currently running 9.0.154 on my TNT. Has Lucent developed anything newer yet? I am not willing to sign up for a service contract to get the software until they have something that works for v.92. The version I am running has the features but they don't work right. Thanks, Tom At 12:14 PM 7/25/01 -0400, you wrote: >ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/Release-9.1.X/9.1.0 - Read >the "Read Me" file > >There is no 9.0.159 available. Here is the link for 9.0.154 : > >ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/Release-9.0.X/9.0-154.0/ > > > >David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ >Network Support Engineer >SOLUNET, Inc. >1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 >Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 >888.449.5766 >800.795.2814 >fax: 321.308.7986 >mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: santiago j ruano r. [mailto:santiago@unicauca.edu.co] >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:52 AM >To: ascend-users@bungi.com >Subject: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 > > >hi! i'm new on this list > > >do you know where i can find the taos 9.0-159 or 9.1 for the max 6000? >i want the v.92 support > >thanks, > >santiago > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ben at champ.tstonramp.com Wed Jul 25 15:54:09 2001 From: ben at champ.tstonramp.com (Ben Beechick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) m in 10-100 line status window Message-ID: <200107252054.f6PKs9A25435@champ.tstonramp.com> What does the m mean in the 10-100 line status window? Having problems getting it to accept dialup calls. It's a Max 4000 running 7.0.22. x10-200 1234567890 x x L1/LM mm-------- x x 12345678901234 x x -------------- ben@tstonramp.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ronh at intercom.net Wed Jul 25 19:55:01 2001 From: ronh at intercom.net (Ron Hensley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) m in 10-100 line status window References: <200107252054.f6PKs9A25435@champ.tstonramp.com> Message-ID: <00f901c1156d$9f98e2e0$0273150a@intercom.net> Only one channel active. D is normal for 2 channels. Check our spids are typed correctly etc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Beechick" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:54 PM Subject: (ASCEND) m in 10-100 line status window > What does the m mean in the 10-100 line status window? > Having problems getting it to accept dialup calls. It's > a Max 4000 running 7.0.22. > > x10-200 1234567890 x > x L1/LM mm-------- x > x 12345678901234 x > x -------------- > > ben@tstonramp.com > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From blaz at amis.net Thu Jul 26 00:59:22 2001 From: blaz at amis.net (Blaz Zupan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) taos 9.1 for max 6000 In-Reply-To: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030BE1@trinidadmover.solunet.com> Message-ID: <20010726075811.N42168-100000@titanic.medinet.si> > * V.92 is a sw upgrade and will not need a hash code. > However, it will be introduced in TAOS 9.1, and there is a charge for base > TAOS > starting 9.1, there will be a fee for 9.1 TAOS. I applaud Lucent's decision to start charging for TAOS upgrades. Now I finally have another argument for my boss on why we should replace our Maxes with Ciscos. Way to go Lucent! Blaz Zupan, Medinet d.o.o, Trzaska 85, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia E-mail: blaz@amis.net, Tel: +386-2-320-6320, Fax: +386-2-320-6325 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jhandy at migkap.com Wed Jul 25 15:15:12 2001 From: Jhandy at migkap.com (Handy, Jack) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) connection profile adding number Message-ID: <766860489962D511B770000347081730046760@MAIL1> Hello, I am using a Max 1800 (TAOS 7.0.22)dialing out to a Pipeline (75 TAOS6.1.44) and although the initial dialout goes fine, when the router tries to add the second B channel to the call it is inserting a number like this: instead of dialing 4 9 12125551234 its dialing 4 9 122125551234 where 4 is the trunk group and 9 is to get an outside line and the connection is MPP Any ideas? Thanks, Jack jhandy@migkap.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From justin at theglovesareoff.com Thu Jul 26 22:14:25 2001 From: justin at theglovesareoff.com (Justin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max tnt question? Message-ID: <03cd01c1164a$3d8fa6a0$876320d0@texinet.net> I have a Max tnt that I am not getting to route out. I can traceroute or ping any ip on my network but cannot get it to go out to the world. I have been using max 6000's and switch to a tnt.. Any help would be appreciated.. Thanks, Justin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Fri Jul 27 00:06:00 2001 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How to enable simultaneous logins - MAX6000 Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010727170600.007a53b0@mail.igrin.co.nz> Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this is a well known or FAQ type question, but I've been poring over manuals and through the admin interface trying to find the right option without success, even though I'm sure I've come across it before..(naturally, when you actually go LOOKING for it, it evades you :) Our MAX6000 is currently rejecting duplicate logins of the same userid by itself, (a duplicate login is disconnected a few seconds after connecting) but now that I'm implementing a Simultaneous-Use policy at the radius server, I want to *enable* duplicate logins on the MAX so I can allow a Simultaneous-Use of 2 for specific logins, and have complete control from the radius server. What is the option called and where might I find it ? Regards, Simon From mfrana at cyber.net.pk Fri Jul 27 03:34:58 2001 From: mfrana at cyber.net.pk (Mustafa F. Rana) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How to enable simultaneous logins - MAX6000 References: <3.0.6.32.20010727170600.007a53b0@mail.igrin.co.nz> Message-ID: <007f01c11677$05dc2f80$0578a3ca@cyber.net.pk> Dear Simon, You can use the following user profile in your Radius for Simultaneous Logins with your Max6K Password = "p8wrd9", Simultaneous-Use = 2 Service-Type = Framed, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Framed-Routing = None, Framed-MTU = 1500, Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP Add the following 2 Entries if Static IP has to be assigned Framed-IP-Address = , Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255, Note: This is a Merit Radius Profile, the Profile woule be the same it would be just the syntax sometimes which varies. Regards Mustafa ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mustafa F. Rana Network Engineer - NOC Cyber Internet Services (Pvt.) Ltd. +92 (42) 111 44 55 66 Ext. 5820 (PABX) +92 (42) 583-9914 (Direct / Fax) +92 (300) 844-8879 (Cell) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Byrnand" To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: [Ascend] How to enable simultaneous logins - MAX6000 > Hi everyone, > > I'm sorry if this is a well known or FAQ type question, but I've been > poring over manuals and through the admin interface trying to find the > right option without success, even though I'm sure I've come across it > before..(naturally, when you actually go LOOKING for it, it evades you :) > > Our MAX6000 is currently rejecting duplicate logins of the same userid by > itself, (a duplicate login is disconnected a few seconds after connecting) > but now that I'm implementing a Simultaneous-Use policy at the radius > server, I want to *enable* duplicate logins on the MAX so I can allow a > Simultaneous-Use of 2 for specific logins, and have complete control from > the radius server. > > What is the option called and where might I find it ? > > Regards, > Simon > > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010727/3d1f0619/attachment.html From simon at igrin.co.nz Fri Jul 27 04:16:31 2001 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How to enable simultaneous logins - MAX6000 In-Reply-To: <007f01c11677$05dc2f80$0578a3ca@cyber.net.pk> References: <3.0.6.32.20010727170600.007a53b0@mail.igrin.co.nz> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010727211631.0120d370@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 01:34 PM 27/07/01 +0500, you wrote: >Dear Simon, > >You can use the following user profile in your Radius for Simultaneous Logins with your Max6K > > Password = "p8wrd9", Simultaneous-Use = 2 > Service-Type = Framed, > Framed-Protocol = PPP, > Framed-Routing = None, > Framed-MTU = 1500, > Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP > >Add the following 2 Entries if Static IP has to be assigned > > Framed-IP-Address = , > Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255, > >Note: This is a Merit Radius Profile, the Profile woule be the same it would be just the syntax sometimes which varies. > > >Regards >Mustafa Hi Mustafa, I'm basically already doing this. I'm running cistron radiusd 1.6.4 and the users file format is the same. The problem is that the MAX seems to have its own way of blocking simultaneous logins somewhere in a local profile or configuration option. If I have Simultaneous-Use = 1 in the radius server profile, the radius server detects the simultaneous login and rejects the radius request, which causes the MAX to return failed authentication to the client. (The user sees the connection refused due to an incorrect login/password) The radius server also notes a Multiple login attempt in radius.log. If I have Simultaneous-Use = 2 (or no Simultaneous-Use at all) then the radius server accepts the simultaneous connection and authenticates it, the users connection is successful, and then about 2 seconds after they are connected, they are disconnected. Users connecting via another NAS are able to connect Simultaneously when allowed by Simultaneous-Use, so it is some configuration aspect of the MAX box. Any other ideas ? Regards, Simon From chris at areti.co.uk Fri Jul 27 04:42:03 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) NAT - how multiple connections are used Message-ID: <20010727104203.A6817@areti.co.uk> I have asked about this before but got no response, does no one know anything about it? I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 with the 8.1 software though I'm not actually using multiple NAT profiles so I suspect that may not be relevant. I have a number of connection profiles set up, all of which use the same NAT profile. If more than one connection profile has 'active' set to 'Yes' which one will be used when a client machine on the local network asks for a connection? While I'm about it are there any user guides which address specifically the use of the Ascend Pipeline as a 'dial-up' router for a SoHo network? The Ascend documentation is OK[ish] but is very fragmented, espcially as the 8.1 software changes the set up procedure completely. An overview of how this application works and a run through of the necessary settings would have saved me a lot of time (and making changes would be easier too, I've usually forgotten the details by the time I come to do it again). -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Fri Jul 27 08:56:51 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max tnt question? Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC030BE7@trinidadmover.solunet.com> Hi Justin, If it's just the TNT itself that is not routing, make sure your default gateway is set up correctly and that your gateway has routes back to the TNT in it's table. If you say that you can ping any ip address in your local network and your gateway is in your local network, I assume that you can ping your inside interface on your gateway. Try to ping the outside (WAN) interface on your gateway. If you are not successful, it's likely that your router isn't set up correctly for the TNT. David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Justin [mailto:justin@theglovesareoff.com] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:14 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Max tnt question? I have a Max tnt that I am not getting to route out. I can traceroute or ping any ip on my network but cannot get it to go out to the world. I have been using max 6000's and switch to a tnt.. Any help would be appreciated.. Thanks, Justin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rocca at multiboard.com Sat Jul 28 12:10:40 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] re: (ASCEND) NAT - how multiple connections are used In-Reply-To: <200107280545.WAA15291@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <000f01c11788$3a6d0960$6e7bfea9@mshome.net> > I have asked about this before but got no response, does no one know > anything about it? > I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 with the 8.1 software though I'm not > actually using multiple NAT profiles so I suspect that may not be > relevant. > I have a number of connection profiles set up, all of which use the > same NAT profile. If more than one connection profile has 'active' > set to 'Yes' which one will be used when a client machine on the > local network asks for a connection? I must admit I'm guessing, and the best way would be for you to probably try it and see which one it dials, but given the linear way all the other rules are applied, I'd guess it tries the top-most active profile in your list. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Jul 28 13:31:59 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 Message-ID: Anyone know what this is? I had 4 of these in about 90 minutes. No users logged in (new install), 8 PRI over a Channelized T3, running nfas. admin> show Shelf 1 ( standalone ): Reqd Oper Slot Type { shelf-1 slot-1 0 } UP UP madd2-card { shelf-1 slot-9 0 } UP UP t3-card OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:31:42 Reset from 63.171.251.199, user profile admin. SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:34:29 FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:21:29 Location: 100ca1c0 10019aac 140710a0 101675f8 10167b24 101698c8 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:37:20 There's 4 more fatal errors with an index of 8. Any help before I have to pay Lucent? TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Sat Jul 28 19:35:59 2001 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (netlink@netlinkcorp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 References: Message-ID: <3B635A6E.176E@netlinkcorp.com> Have you tried logging into http://www.esight.com/ Open up a chat session with a tech and explain You might have to supply a serial number of the unit. I am not sure if there are any restrictions but I have used this method in the past and it worked quite well for me [ie. No cost ] ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. Troy Settle wrote: > > Anyone know what this is? I had 4 of these in about 90 minutes. No users > logged in (new install), 8 PRI over a Channelized T3, running nfas. > > admin> show > Shelf 1 ( standalone ): > Reqd Oper Slot Type > { shelf-1 slot-1 0 } UP UP madd2-card > { shelf-1 slot-9 0 } UP UP t3-card > > OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) > Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:31:42 > Reset from 63.171.251.199, user profile admin. > > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) > Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:34:29 > > FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) > Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:21:29 > Location: 100ca1c0 10019aac 140710a0 101675f8 10167b24 101698c8 > > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) > Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:37:20 > > There's 4 more fatal errors with an index of 8. > > Any help before I have to pay Lucent? > > TIA, > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Jul 29 09:30:42 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 In-Reply-To: <3B635A6E.176E@netlinkcorp.com> Message-ID: esight got dropped. It's now http://support.lucent.com, and I've not been having much luck with it. Esight was dog slow, the new site is just a general PITA. Anyways, thanks for the reply. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ** netlink@netlinkcorp.com ** Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 8:36 PM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 ** ** ** Have you tried logging into http://www.esight.com/ ** Open up a chat session with a tech and explain ** You might have to supply a serial number of the unit. ** I am not sure if there are any restrictions but ** I have used this method in the past and it worked quite ** well for me [ie. No cost ] ** ------- ** R. Hall ** NET-LINK Corp. ** ** ** ** Troy Settle wrote: ** > ** > Anyone know what this is? I had 4 of these in about 90 ** minutes. No users ** > logged in (new install), 8 PRI over a Channelized T3, running nfas. ** > ** > admin> show ** > Shelf 1 ( standalone ): ** > Reqd Oper Slot Type ** > { shelf-1 slot-1 0 } UP UP madd2-card ** > { shelf-1 slot-9 0 } UP UP t3-card ** > ** > OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) ** > Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:31:42 ** > Reset from 63.171.251.199, user profile admin. ** > ** > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) ** > Date: 07/26/2001. Time: 17:34:29 ** > ** > FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) ** > Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:21:29 ** > Location: 100ca1c0 10019aac 140710a0 101675f8 10167b24 101698c8 ** > ** > SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.2 Shelf 1 (tntsr) ** > Date: 07/27/2001. Time: 21:37:20 ** > ** > There's 4 more fatal errors with an index of 8. ** > ** > Any help before I have to pay Lucent? ** > ** > TIA, ** > ** > -- ** > Troy Settle ** > Pulaski Networks ** > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 ** > http://www.psknet.com ** > ** > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MPuras at solunet.com Sun Jul 29 21:43:13 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) NAT - how multiple connections are used Message-ID: <5AB283352A67D511802000D0B7A87BEC0A4134@trinidadmover.solunet.com> I am going to say that if you are using NAT then you have to bind a NAT profile to a connection profile so in that case it will use the connection profile that you are bound to. Otherwise, I would also guess that it will use the first one. Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Network Support Engineer We don't make network products, we make them Work! Mailto:mpuras@solunet.com 888.SOLUNET (Canada) / 888.449.5766 (USA) -----Original Message----- From: Peter Rocca [mailto:rocca@multiboard.com] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 1:11 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: re: (ASCEND) NAT - how multiple connections are used > I have asked about this before but got no response, does no one know > anything about it? > I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 with the 8.1 software though I'm not > actually using multiple NAT profiles so I suspect that may not be > relevant. > I have a number of connection profiles set up, all of which use the > same NAT profile. If more than one connection profile has 'active' > set to 'Yes' which one will be used when a client machine on the > local network asks for a connection? I must admit I'm guessing, and the best way would be for you to probably try it and see which one it dials, but given the linear way all the other rules are applied, I'd guess it tries the top-most active profile in your list. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From chris at areti.co.uk Mon Jul 30 02:49:30 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) FATAL ERROR: Index: 8 In-Reply-To: ; from troy@psknet.com on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:30:42AM -0400 References: <3B635A6E.176E@netlinkcorp.com> Message-ID: <20010730084930.I19085@areti.co.uk> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:30:42AM -0400, Troy Settle wrote: > > esight got dropped. It's now http://support.lucent.com, and I've not been > having much luck with it. Esight was dog slow, the new site is just a > general PITA. > Yes, I found the same, one spends ages mucking about with 'registration' and such without much useful information being supplied. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From emad.anis at link.net Mon Jul 30 04:26:38 2001 From: emad.anis at link.net (Emad Anis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disconnection Code Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 3957 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010730/6fe907a8/attachment.gif From plalor at infoasis.com Mon Jul 30 12:52:20 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) NAS-Port-Type broken in 9.0.3? Message-ID: I just updated a TNT from 9.0.0 to 9.0.3 and it broke all my ISDn connections, which have a check item of "NAS-Port-Type=Sync". RADIUS reports "expecting 1 but got 2". I thought the port-Types were 0 (async) and 1 (sync). Can anyone shed light? -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Mon Jul 30 13:56:18 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) NAS-Port-Type broken in 9.0.3? References: Message-ID: <3B65ADD2.EFBFC103@lucentradius.com> Peter Lalor wrote: > > I just updated a TNT from 9.0.0 to 9.0.3 and it broke all my ISDn > connections, which have a check item of "NAS-Port-Type=Sync". RADIUS > reports "expecting 1 but got 2". I thought the port-Types were 0 > (async) and 1 (sync). > > Can anyone shed light? 2 = ISDN Here is a complete list of NAS-Port-Types in RADIUS (Not all Supported in TAOS): VALUE NAS-Port-Type Async 0 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Sync 1 VALUE NAS-Port-Type ISDN 2 VALUE NAS-Port-Type ISDN-V120 3 VALUE NAS-Port-Type ISDN-V110 4 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Virtual 5 VALUE NAS-Port-Type PIAFS 6 VALUE NAS-Port-Type HDLC-Clear-Channel 7 VALUE NAS-Port-Type X-25 8 VALUE NAS-Port-Type X-75 9 VALUE NAS-Port-Type G-3-Fax 10 VALUE NAS-Port-Type SDSL 11 VALUE NAS-Port-Type ADSL-CAP 12 VALUE NAS-Port-Type ADSL-DMT 13 VALUE NAS-Port-Type IDSL 14 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Ethernet 15 VALUE NAS-Port-Type xDSL 16 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Cable 17 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Wireless-Other 18 VALUE NAS-Port-Type Wireless-IEEE-802-11 19 -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Mon Jul 30 15:13:38 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:58 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) NAS-Port-Type broken in 9.0.3? In-Reply-To: <3B65ADD2.EFBFC103@lucentradius.com> References: <3B65ADD2.EFBFC103@lucentradius.com> Message-ID: >Peter Lalor wrote: >> >> I just updated a TNT from 9.0.0 to 9.0.3 and it broke all my ISDn >> connections, which have a check item of "NAS-Port-Type=Sync". RADIUS >> reports "expecting 1 but got 2". I thought the port-Types were 0 >> (async) and 1 (sync). >> >> Can anyone shed light? > >2 = ISDN > >Here is a complete list of NAS-Port-Types in RADIUS (Not all Supported in >TAOS): > >VALUE NAS-Port-Type Async 0 >VALUE NAS-Port-Type Sync 1 >VALUE NAS-Port-Type ISDN 2 Thank you. Apparently, 9.0.3 changes the response from 1 (Sync) to 2 (ISDN), and the corresponding check item needs to be changed in the RADIUS profiles. As this list has always suggested using Sync/Async as check items, folks need to be aware of this change. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Mon Jul 30 16:11:39 2001 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disconnection Code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010731091139.008ec740@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 12:26 PM 7/30/01 +0300, Emad Anis wrote: >Hi all >We have MAXs TNT " software release 8.0.4 ", and from the Navis Access we are able to create a report for call >disconnection reasons . most of the reports have a disconnection/progress code 185/66 with high ratio , but unfortunately >we didn't find an explanation for this code combination . >does anyone have an explanation for this code . >thx in advance Hi, If you look on the PDF documentation for the "RADIUS configuration guide" and search for "Ascend-Disconnect-Cause" you'll find a table of disconnect causes. (It's in the dead tree manual too, but harder to locate ;) 185 is a very common one and means "The call disconnected because the remote end hungup". Regards, Simon From gdaley at lucent.com Mon Jul 30 19:21:51 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnection Code Message-ID: This is in the MIBs, which are available for download from the FTP site. Try event.mib, and search for 185 and for 66. The first is a disconnect code (why disconnection occurred) and the second is a progress code (where the session was up to). If you have difficulty interpreting the results, try to raise a case with TAC. Greg -----Original Message----- From: Emad Anis [mailto:emad.anis@link.net] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:27 PM To: Ascend-Users Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnection Code Hi all We have MAXs TNT " software release 8.0.4 ", and from the Navis Access we are able to create a report for call disconnection reasons . most of the reports have a disconnection/progress code 185/66 with high ratio , but unfortunately we didn't find an explanation for this code combination . does anyone have an explanation for this code . thx in advance Emad Anis DataCommunication Engineer LINKdotNET E-mail: emad.anis@link.net Web: www.link.net Tel.: +202 3367711 Fax: +202 3364910 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From yassir at binsalmeen.co.ae Tue Jul 31 03:48:09 2001 From: yassir at binsalmeen.co.ae (Yassir Mustafa) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Radius server Message-ID: I used to get the error RADAUTH :6 when testing the radius server using radauth username password .... regards Yassir Mustafa binsalmeen computers ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Jul 31 10:39:06 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT how to disconnect a user? Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010731103906.023d0000@mail.rockriver.net> Sorry, I am new to TNT. Ran 6096 Maxen for a couple of years. Can someone please tell me how to force (disconnect) a connected customer off-line with the TNT? Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From scopeland at pldi.net Tue Jul 31 11:16:03 2001 From: scopeland at pldi.net (Steven Copeland) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT how to disconnect a user? In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010731103906.023d0000@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: from the prompt in your TNT > >userstat (This will give you a list of all the active sessions on the TNT. Find the sessionID of the user you want to kick off) >userstat -k "sessionID" (this will kill their session and kick them off) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Thank You, Steven Copeland Network Administrator Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. http://www.pldi.net http://www.pld.net http:/www.ptci.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ISPstuff > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:39 AM > To: Ascend Users > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT how to disconnect a user? > > > Sorry, I am new to TNT. Ran 6096 Maxen for a couple of years. > Can someone > please tell me how to force (disconnect) a connected customer > off-line with > the TNT? > > Thanks, > > Tom > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Tue Jul 31 18:56:47 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:59 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Zero-length UDP packet filter? Message-ID: I need to write a filter to drop zero-length UDP packets. I believe this can be done with a generic filter, but I haven't played with those for awhile. Can anyone give me some pointers? -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/