USR doesn't support V.44 - so you can't check that with that client modem. Why not try a Lucent/Agere Win Modem with V.92 - I believe Modem-On-Hold will work with it, and the client driver also supports V.44.... See http://808hi.com/56k/ltwinv92.htm Aloha, Richard http://808hi.com/56k/ 56k=v.Unreliable -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of ISPstuff Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 6:04 AM To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother We just switched from Max 6096 to TNT with Multi-DSP cards so we could be the first on the block to offer v.92. We are seeing pretty much the same connect speeds and success rates as we did with our 6096 running 8.0.3. All I can say is that v.92 is a big waste of money so far. I picked up a USR v.92 external Sportster as a test and it won't connect to our TNT with either moh (modem on hold) or quick-connect enabled. Lucent does not support PCM-upstream in the current TAOS 9.0-159.0 that we are running. v.44 compression is the only thing that might be working. I haven't actually tested the compression yet but it doesn't affect connections when turned on. Has anyone else reading this list experimented with v.92? I am interested in hearing experience from others. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/