From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Jun 1 12:01:29 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:44 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) pipeline 75 not staying connected... In-Reply-To: <200106010545.WAA16623@max.bungi.com> References: <200106010545.WAA16623@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: glavoy@apple.com (Gary LaVoy) > >So over the last week or so, my pipeline 75 will no longer keep connected. I >have the connection:sessions options:idle parameter set to 0 (never drop?) and >even tried upgrading to version 8.0-101.0 of the sw. Still drops. Perhaps the far side is dropping the call? The disconnect code will tell you why the call is actually dropping. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com The San Francisco Bay Area's Macintosh 415-459-7991 Consultant and Internet Service Provider 415-459-7992 fax http://www.infoasis.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rhof at netinc.ca Mon Jun 4 19:19:24 2001 From: rhof at netinc.ca (Robert Hof) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max 6096 not sending passwords via RADIUS. Message-ID: Hi folks, I've got no problems with my 4048s authenticating via radius, but this 6096 I just picked up is sending names but not passwords to the radius server. What am I missing? TIA, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010604/30e2233b/attachment.htm From fthom at flinthills.com Mon Jun 4 22:43:03 2001 From: fthom at flinthills.com (Frank Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX4002-trestore-Menu items nested too deeply Message-ID: I had a 4004 blow up on me and when I try to trestore the config I get the error--Menu items nested too deeply then data lost. I cannot get the unit to enable the third and fourth wan ports and I suspect that this is why... Anyone seen this before and know of a way to restore without this problem? Thanks Frank Thomas Flint Hills Internet Manhattan, KS 66502 From denny at reiters.org Tue Jun 5 12:55:16 2001 From: denny at reiters.org (Dennis Reiter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) APX8000 Message-ID: <20010605125516.A57187@reiters.org> One of our locations is looking at buying an APX8000 to replace several TNTs with the old double-slot modem cards. Anybody have good/bad experiences with these beasts? Thanks, Denny -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net www.scapegoats.org Easily amused. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Tue Jun 5 20:02:27 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) APX8000 In-Reply-To: <20010605125516.A57187@reiters.org> Message-ID: Dennis, I've not been hand-on with the APX yet, but if you're already familiar with the TNT, the replacement should go very smooth. I currently use the TNT with the APX 96 port DSP cards, and I'm in heaven. Modem performance on 9.0.2 is great, my users are getting faster connect speeds and more reliable connections. As for the APX itself, it's my understanding that it's quite a machine, with a much stronger backplane than the TNT, allowing it to pump more bits around. It's not much, but I hope this helps, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dennis Reiter ** Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:55 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) APX8000 ** ** ** One of our locations is looking at buying an APX8000 to replace ** several TNTs with the old double-slot modem cards. Anybody have ** good/bad experiences with these beasts? ** ** Thanks, ** ** Denny ** ** -- ** Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org ** Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net ** www.scapegoats.org ** Easily amused. ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From denny at reiters.org Tue Jun 5 21:29:35 2001 From: denny at reiters.org (Dennis Reiter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) APX8000 In-Reply-To: ; from troy@psknet.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 09:02:27PM -0400 References: <20010605125516.A57187@reiters.org> Message-ID: <20010605212935.N58507@reiters.org> Troy, Thanks for the info. Disconnects and low connect speeds are the main problems that their customers complain about, so this is good to hear. And if I can replace a couple of TNTs with the APX8000, I can redeploy the TNTs for DSL. Thanks again, Denny Quoting Troy Settle (troy@psknet.com): > > Dennis, > > I've not been hand-on with the APX yet, but if you're already familiar with > the TNT, the replacement should go very smooth. I currently use the TNT > with the APX 96 port DSP cards, and I'm in heaven. Modem performance on > 9.0.2 is great, my users are getting faster connect speeds and more reliable > connections. > > As for the APX itself, it's my understanding that it's quite a machine, with > a much stronger backplane than the TNT, allowing it to pump more bits > around. > > It's not much, but I hope this helps, > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 > > > ** -----Original Message----- > ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dennis Reiter > ** Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 1:55 PM > ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > ** Subject: (ASCEND) APX8000 > ** > ** > ** One of our locations is looking at buying an APX8000 to replace > ** several TNTs with the old double-slot modem cards. Anybody have > ** good/bad experiences with these beasts? > ** > ** Thanks, > ** > ** Denny > ** > ** -- > ** Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org > ** Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net > ** www.scapegoats.org > ** Easily amused. > ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ** > ** > -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net www.scapegoats.org We put the "k" in "kwality" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rip at itsinfonet.com Tue Jun 5 22:50:56 2001 From: rip at itsinfonet.com (rip@itsinfonet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Need Information about B-STDX 8000/9000 Upgrade to R 07.02.02.00 Message-ID: <000001c0ee3b$e4624320$2700a8c0@its> Does anyone have information about obtaining the 4 Port T1 Module with 16 MB of memory to conform to the R 07.02.02.00 upgrade requirements? The Module information of an Ascend / Lucent 8 MB, 4 Port T1 Module is P/N 710-00003-01, P/C 59021, Rev 10. What is the P/N, P/C, and Rev of the 16 MB, 4 Port, T1 Module? I would be interested to purchase the correct card or possible the complete unit that has the 8 MB T1 Module in it at the R 07.02.02 .00 software release. Any information / ideas / help will be appreciated. Thanks Clarence Fleming ITS From nealis at rcn.com Wed Jun 6 08:15:49 2001 From: nealis at rcn.com (Jason Nealis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) APX8000 In-Reply-To: <20010605125516.A57187@reiters.org>; from denny@reiters.org on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:55:16PM -0500 References: <20010605125516.A57187@reiters.org> Message-ID: <20010606091549.A514@rcn.com> FWIW, We have about 15 fully packed APX 8000's out in the network, They run very well with little to no day to day administration. There were some small speed bumps in the beginging but lately they run smooth. Addtionally, remember only the MADD card will take the new V.92 code. The older CSM3 DSP's can't handle the new code. (Which Sucks VERY HARD!) :) Jason On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:55:16PM -0500, Dennis Reiter stated > One of our locations is looking at buying an APX8000 to replace > several TNTs with the old double-slot modem cards. Anybody have > good/bad experiences with these beasts? > > Thanks, > > Denny > > -- > Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org > Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net > www.scapegoats.org > Easily amused. > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ -- ------ Jason Nealis Sr. Director Internet Operations RCN (NASDAQ) RCNC ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jun 6 12:21:40 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) APX8000 In-Reply-To: <200106060545.WAA12860@max.bungi.com> References: <200106060545.WAA12860@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Dennis Reiter > >Thanks for the info. Disconnects and low connect speeds are the >main problems that their customers complain about, so this is good >to hear. And if I can replace a couple of TNTs with the APX8000, >I can redeploy the TNTs for DSL. Using SDSL line cards? if so, bear in mind that support for that has been removed in recent firmware release (can't recall as of what release), so you'll be stuck using outdated code. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From denny at reiters.org Wed Jun 6 12:31:57 2001 From: denny at reiters.org (Dennis Reiter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) APX8000 In-Reply-To: ; from plalor@infoasis.com on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:21:40AM -0700 References: <200106060545.WAA12860@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <20010606123157.B72584@reiters.org> Quoting Peter Lalor (plalor@infoasis.com): > >From: Dennis Reiter > > > >Thanks for the info. Disconnects and low connect speeds are the > >main problems that their customers complain about, so this is good > >to hear. And if I can replace a couple of TNTs with the APX8000, > >I can redeploy the TNTs for DSL. > > Using SDSL line cards? if so, bear in mind that support for that has > been removed in recent firmware release (can't recall as of what > release), so you'll be stuck using outdated code. Correct. What I always viewed as the biggest advantage to the TNT was that I could throw a couple of cards into a box and have dialup & dsl in one neat package for my remotes. Oh well. -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net www.scapegoats.org Sometimes you have to stride boldly up to life, look it straight in the eye, and say "huh?" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From butch at sheltonbusinessmachines.com Wed Jun 6 16:44:09 2001 From: butch at sheltonbusinessmachines.com (Butch Evans) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Resetting Password in Max 4048 Message-ID: I have purchased a 4048 with the passwords still in it. The seller is no longer available. How can I reset the password on this guy? Butch Evans From Edetective2000 at Mochamail.net Tue Jun 5 17:19:42 2001 From: Edetective2000 at Mochamail.net (Edetective2000@Mochamail.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ~ Find Out the TRUTH About AnyOne ~ Message-ID: Download the New E-Detective2000 Investigative Software and Discover Amazing Facts and Information!! http://www.edetect.hpg.com.br/index.htm ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rajesh_mago at satyam.net.in Thu Jun 7 09:47:07 2001 From: rajesh_mago at satyam.net.in (rajesh_mago) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Can somebody answer APX8000 technical queries Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20010607200512.00a64840@imap.satyam.net.in> Hi!, I have some technical queries regarding APX 8000, will be delighted if somebody could help me with these 1. how can the modems calls be made busy on a 8 port E1 card ? (for both e1r2 and PRI lines) 2. How can the calls be blocked from the CO switch for 8 port E1 card ? (for both e1r2 and PRI lines) 3. Does APX8000 supports priority category number calls by default, if not then what is needed to make it work ? 4. Does APX8000 supports CLI (7 digits and 10 digits) by default, if not then how can i configure it? CLI - caller line identification 5. does APX8000 supports calls from Local / STD PCO booth by default, if not then what config. change is required ? 6. How can i configure APX8000 without using console or telnet, can i use Navisaccess or Navisconnect? thanks Rajesh Mago ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Jun 7 13:05:54 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) NT4 Dialup Message-ID: All, I've got a user with NT4 that's having dialup problems. She's able to connect to a Max 4000 running 7.0.26, but we're getting a 65/45 when dialing into a TNT running 9.0.2. 65/45 is described by Ascend/Lucent as: Before the initial connection was active (during PPP negotiation), a TAOS unit received a Terminate Request from a user's PPP aplication. Typically, the user has manually disconnected the call from the dial-in client before the PPP negotiation had completed between the dial-in client and the TAOS unit. The user's computer is reporting that it timed out waiting for a response from the PPP peer. I've been through her phonebook entries, but didn't see anything amis. The fact that she's able to connect to a Max 4000 just fine is telling me that her settings are ok. Can anyone offer any suggestions? TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 994.4254 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Jun 7 13:18:35 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Perm/Switched connection between P50 and MAX1800 Message-ID: All, I've got several Pipeline 50's connecting to Max 1800's. Normally, these things are brainless to install and configure, but I've got one that's refusing to play ball with me, it won't bring up both channels. - The Pipeline can dial out on either channel - both channels on the other end are accepting calls - Base/Min/Max channels on both routers are all set to 2 - Encaps on both ends is set to MPP In the past, when doing these configurations, the pipeline would automatically bring up both channels as soon as it brought up one. No so this time. Any suggestions? If someone is willing, give me a call at 866-477-5638, and give me 5 minutes of your time to look at this. TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From amittank_net at yahoo.com Fri Jun 8 00:55:51 2001 From: amittank_net at yahoo.com (Amit Tank) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How to limit user session Message-ID: <20010608055551.68523.qmail@web13104.mail.yahoo.com> Hi All, I am using MAX TNT and Navis Radius 3.0. I want to limit a dial-in user connection for a specified time period in every 24 hours.Can some one help me in configuring the same. Reagards Amit. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Fri Jun 8 08:58:34 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:45 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Perm/Switched connection between P50 and MAX1800 Message-ID: <3B20DA0A.9089CA86@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Hi Troy, short time ago I had to set up a P50-P50 nailed connection as well and had to fetch all necessary parameters for this. On both ends it needs: Switch Type=NET 3 Line 1...Clock Source=Yes Line 1...B1 Usage=Nailed Line 1...B1 Prt/Grp=1 Line 1...B2 Usage=Nailed Line 1...B2 Prt/Grp=2 Encaps=MPP Encaps options...Base Ch Count=2 ! Encaps options...Min Ch Count=2 Encaps options...Max Ch Count=2 Telco options...AnsOrig=Both Telco options...Call Type=Nailed/Mpp Telco options...Group=1,2 (entered as one,comma,two) on one end (originate call setup if line is down): Telco options...FT1 Caller=Yes on the other: Telco options...FT1 Caller=No That's all. Hope it helps. Best regards, Wolfgang _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Netzwerk-Design Remote Access und WAN-L?sungen Storage-L?sungen (RAID, libraries, NAS/SAN) COMPAQ Server und PC Windows NT Implementation und Administration Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mark at opuscreative.com Fri Jun 8 16:57:04 2001 From: mark at opuscreative.com (Mark Brody) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 T1 config help Message-ID: I am trying to do a PPP T1 to a customer site. Here is what I have that is not working. Looks like we have a WAN link but data moving across it. Side A (My Side) - Pipeline 220 Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.1 (our gateway) Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether1/IP Addr - 202.210.200.186/24 Ethernet/Connections/Cust001/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.202.106/30 Side B (Cust001) - Pipeline 130 Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.186 Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/IP Addr - 202.210.202.106/30 Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/2nd IP - 10.0.0.1 (for the internal side) Ethernet/Connections/ISP/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.200.186 The connection seems to come up fine for one minute or so and then drops. At no time can I actually route packets while it is up. On the Pipe 220, it shows L1/LA nnnn........ (4 DS0's active). On the 130 at the cust site, it show link active as well. Telco has run end-to-end tests and says the T is clear. Any ideas? Thanks, ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Fri Jun 8 21:34:15 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 T1 config help In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Are you getting TX packets but no RX packets? Could be call-type setting... On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mark Brody wrote: > I am trying to do a PPP T1 to a customer site. Here is what I have that is > not working. Looks like we have a WAN link but data moving across it. > > Side A (My Side) - Pipeline 220 > Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.1 (our gateway) > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether1/IP Addr - 202.210.200.186/24 > Ethernet/Connections/Cust001/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.202.106/30 > > Side B (Cust001) - Pipeline 130 > Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.186 > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/IP Addr - 202.210.202.106/30 > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/2nd IP - 10.0.0.1 (for the internal side) > Ethernet/Connections/ISP/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.200.186 > > The connection seems to come up fine for one minute or so and then drops. At > no time can I actually route packets while it is up. On the Pipe 220, it > shows L1/LA nnnn........ (4 DS0's active). On the 130 at the cust site, it > show link active as well. > > Telco has run end-to-end tests and says the T is clear. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sysop at worldnetoh.com Sat Jun 9 09:51:27 2001 From: sysop at worldnetoh.com (WNI System Administration) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Serial Number Question Message-ID: We just acquired a TNT DC unit. The previous owners removed the serial numbers (they say) believing that this would deter possible thieves. Whatever. My 2 questions are: (1) I'm pretty sure the show command will confirm the serial numbers on the cards in the slots. Is this correct? Is there a way to do this for the power supplies? (2) Can anyone recommend the source for a AC->DC inverter so we can power this thing up? Thanks in advance!!!! Rob System Administration (216) 561-9447 WorldNet Interactive http://worldnetoh.com From mihail.balikov at interbgc.com Mon Jun 11 03:45:47 2001 From: mihail.balikov at interbgc.com (mihail.balikov@interbgc.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) No transfer between dial-up and max6k in 50% of connections Message-ID: <20010611084547.55283.qmail@goliat.interbgc.com> Hi, In 50% of dial-up connections users can't make transfer and they have to reconnect. max assigned them IP , I see this ip in routing table , everything looks ok... please help mihail ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ms at polbox.pl Mon Jun 11 02:40:25 2001 From: ms at polbox.pl (Maciej Starski) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Problem with DSLTNT Message-ID: Hi When I was configuring DSLTNT I deleted ip-global by chance. I know, nothing happen by chance. :) How can I undelete this option? ------------------------------------------ Maciej Starski mailto:ms@polbox.pl ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sumitdas at qwest.net Mon Jun 11 09:43:00 2001 From: sumitdas at qwest.net (Sumit Das) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Help with SecureConnect Manager 3.0.3 Message-ID: <3B24D8F4.D2230611@qwest.net> Hi I am new to the Ascend Firewall/SecureConnect Manager and have a very trivial question :) Is it possible to have a firewall rule to allow all outgoing packets on all ports. I use Net2Phone, and it specifies for specific ports to be opened (UDP and TCP), and I have opened them but it still does not work. Do not know if that is a Net2Phone problem or not. When I take down the firewall, everything works fine. If anybody has faced this issue, and has solved it, then I might not have to open all outgoing packets - BUT I would definitely like to know if that is possible or not !! Would really appreciate some help and education !! Thanks Sumit From troy at psknet.com Mon Jun 11 15:02:19 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Problem with DSLTNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: AFAIK, there is no undelete option. What you can do, is restore a good configuration from tftp. You do write your configurations off to a TFTP server, don't you? G'luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Maciej Starski ** Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:40 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Problem with DSLTNT ** ** ** Hi ** When I was configuring DSLTNT I deleted ip-global by chance. ** I know, nothing happen by chance. :) ** How can I undelete this option? ** ------------------------------------------ ** Maciej Starski mailto:ms@polbox.pl ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From philb at cyberlynk.net Mon Jun 11 20:18:12 2001 From: philb at cyberlynk.net (Phil Bedard) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) odd TNT problem Message-ID: <20010611201812.J18491@shofixti.kr4d.com> We are using a TNT running 7.0.22. We support multiple concurrent accounts using the same username and switching from Max->TNT has resulted in this problem: If a user dials in with the same username as another user already dialed into the box, the TNT will assign them the same IP address. It's not a mpp bundle, just straight PPP, and it results in neither user being able to pass any data. They are getting IP addresses out of a dynamic pool. Phil ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sumitdas at qwest.net Mon Jun 11 23:47:40 2001 From: sumitdas at qwest.net (Sumit Das) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Help with SecureConnect Manager 3.0.3 Message-ID: <3B259EEC.488A5EB3@qwest.net> Hi I am new to the Ascend Firewall/SecureConnect Manager and have a very trivial question :) Is it possible to have a firewall rule to allow all outgoing packets on all ports. I use Net2Phone, and it specifies for specific ports to be opened (UDP and TCP), and I have opened them but it still does not work. Do not know if that is a Net2Phone problem or not. When I take down the firewall, everything works fine. If anybody has faced this issue, and has solved it, then I might not have to open all outgoing packets - BUT I would definitely like to know if that is possible or not !! Would really appreciate some help and education !! Thanks Sumit From tushar at ecpi.com Tue Jun 12 08:09:44 2001 From: tushar at ecpi.com (Tushar Patel) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Fixed ip address with subnet Message-ID: <200106121309.IAA02280@ecpi.com> Hi I have client who has pipeline 50 (ver 5.1a). Needs Fixed IP address I am trying to assign him fixed IP address with subnet without any luck My radius entry is Auth-Type = System Service-Type = Framed, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Framed-Routing = None, Framed-IP-Address=216.141.25.21, Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255, Framed-Route = "216.141.25.216/29 216.141.25.21 2", Framed-MTU = 1500, Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP I am trying to connect to Max 3000. Can somebody tell me what is wrong with my radius entry and share what I need to config on the pipeline 50 side too. Tushar ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From KComer at nwonline.net Tue Jun 12 07:31:03 2001 From: KComer at nwonline.net (KComer@nwonline.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 T1 config help Message-ID: <70E16393FAC3D311861E00E02954B45C36F8AA@snuffy.nwonline.net> Do you have the number of ds0's set to 4 on both ends of the circuit? Or at least set the same? This sounds like what the problem might be. Keith Comer Network Support Specialist www.nwonline.net 419.334.9042 toll free: 888.644.6638 fax: 419.355.1157 -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of mick Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:34 PM To: Mark Brody Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 T1 config help Are you getting TX packets but no RX packets? Could be call-type setting... On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mark Brody wrote: > I am trying to do a PPP T1 to a customer site. Here is what I have that is > not working. Looks like we have a WAN link but data moving across it. > > Side A (My Side) - Pipeline 220 > Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.1 (our gateway) > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether1/IP Addr - 202.210.200.186/24 > Ethernet/Connections/Cust001/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.202.106/30 > > Side B (Cust001) - Pipeline 130 > Ethernet/Static Routes/Default Route - 202.210.200.186 > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/IP Addr - 202.210.202.106/30 > Ethernet/Mod Config/Ether/2nd IP - 10.0.0.1 (for the internal side) > Ethernet/Connections/ISP/IP Options/LAN Adrs - 202.210.200.186 > > The connection seems to come up fine for one minute or so and then drops. At > no time can I actually route packets while it is up. On the Pipe 220, it > shows L1/LA nnnn........ (4 DS0's active). On the 130 at the cust site, it > show link active as well. > > Telco has run end-to-end tests and says the T is clear. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From snow at apassmore.com Tue Jun 12 15:01:11 2001 From: snow at apassmore.com (Randy Snow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Improving Latency between a Pipeline 75 & 50 In-Reply-To: <200106121309.IAA02280@ecpi.com> Message-ID: <007901c0f37a$6d907fc0$1e01a8c0@apassmore.com> Does anyone know how I might be able to improve my latency (pings) between my P75 at home and P50 at work? 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 40/50/80 ms This is the ping between both Pipelines. 50 ms seems to be my average, but I hear of many people getting 18ms to 25ms. I have NAT disabled, and I'm using SW +8.0-101.0+ on both units. I'm just curious if I have something setup wrong? Not only do I run the local network, I also enjoy playing games on occasion and every little bit helps. Any advice appreciated...tried compression changes and disabling compression. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From fthom at flinthills.com Tue Jun 12 17:12:57 2001 From: fthom at flinthills.com (Frank Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] pipeline 15 in win 2000? Message-ID: Anyone successfully install a pipeline 15 under win2000? It was originally detected as an unknown modem and I manually pointed it to the inf file in pipeline configuration folder. It then detected it as a p15 but when I attempt to dial I receive error 619. Any ideas would be helpful. I am having trouble even determining if it supported by win2000? Thanks Frank Thomas Flint Hills Internet Manhattan, KS 66502 From ccook at tcworks.net Tue Jun 12 16:49:13 2001 From: ccook at tcworks.net (Chris Cook) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Improving Latency between a Pipeline 75 & 50 References: <007901c0f37a$6d907fc0$1e01a8c0@apassmore.com> Message-ID: <3B268E59.F51085A3@tcworks.net> STAC compression is going to give you the lowest latency you can enable it here: Ethernet -> Connections -> Your Connection -> Encaps Options -> Link Comp=Stac-9 Make sure that you do that on both routers, should fix you up. == Chris o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | o-------------------------------------------------------------o Randy Snow wrote: > > Does anyone know how I might be able to improve my latency (pings) > between my P75 at home and P50 at work? > > 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip > min/avg/max = 40/50/80 ms > > This is the ping between both Pipelines. > > 50 ms seems to be my average, but I hear of many people getting 18ms to > 25ms. I have NAT disabled, and I'm using SW +8.0-101.0+ on both units. > I'm just curious if I have something setup wrong? > > Not only do I run the local network, I also enjoy playing games on > occasion and every little bit helps. Any advice appreciated...tried > compression changes and disabling compression. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From fthom at flinthills.com Tue Jun 12 16:48:02 2001 From: fthom at flinthills.com (Frank Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) pipeline 15 in win 2000? In-Reply-To: <007901c0f37a$6d907fc0$1e01a8c0@apassmore.com> Message-ID: Anyone successfully install a pipeline 15 under win2000? It was originally detected as an unknown modem and I manually pointed it to the inf file in pipeline configuration folder. It then detected it as a p15 but when I attempt to dial I receive error 619. Any ideas would be helpful. I am having trouble even determining if it supported by win2000? Thanks Frank Flint Hills Internet ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mrcpu at internetcds.com Tue Jun 12 20:05:28 2001 From: mrcpu at internetcds.com (Jaye Mathisen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Improving Latency between a Pipeline 75 & 50 In-Reply-To: <3B268E59.F51085A3@tcworks.net>; from ccook@tcworks.net on Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:49:13PM -0500 References: <007901c0f37a$6d907fc0$1e01a8c0@apassmore.com> <3B268E59.F51085A3@tcworks.net> Message-ID: <20010612180528.L51977@apocalypse.cdsnet.net> Do you have any data to back this up? It has been my experience that any compression increases latence, with the exception of VJ, only because of the need to wait for enough data for compression to be effective, or in the case of truly binary/random data, the expansion of the data. On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:49:13PM -0500, Chris Cook wrote: > STAC compression is going to give you the lowest latency you can enable > it here: > > Ethernet -> Connections -> Your Connection -> Encaps Options -> Link > Comp=Stac-9 > > Make sure that you do that on both routers, should fix you up. > > == > Chris > > o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o > |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | > |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | > o-------------------------------------------------------------o > > > > Randy Snow wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how I might be able to improve my latency (pings) > > between my P75 at home and P50 at work? > > > > 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip > > min/avg/max = 40/50/80 ms > > > > This is the ping between both Pipelines. > > > > 50 ms seems to be my average, but I hear of many people getting 18ms to > > 25ms. I have NAT disabled, and I'm using SW +8.0-101.0+ on both units. > > I'm just curious if I have something setup wrong? > > > > Not only do I run the local network, I also enjoy playing games on > > occasion and every little bit helps. Any advice appreciated...tried > > compression changes and disabling compression. > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From snow at apassmore.com Wed Jun 13 08:40:32 2001 From: snow at apassmore.com (Randy Snow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Improving Latency between a Pipeline 75 & 50 In-Reply-To: <20010612180528.L51977@apocalypse.cdsnet.net> Message-ID: <00a601c0f40e$6b720d50$1e01a8c0@apassmore.com> This is just a RAW ping, I don't know if that tells you anything...but on my tests, without any compression I get a 60ms steady ping. With compression I get a 40ms to 50ms ping. Stac-9 and MS-Stac perform the best. I'm just curious if there is anything else I can enable or turn off to improve my latency. But so far, the ping improves with compression. -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@celestial.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@celestial.com] On Behalf Of Jaye Mathisen Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:05 PM To: Chris Cook Cc: Randy Snow; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Improving Latency between a Pipeline 75 & 50 Do you have any data to back this up? It has been my experience that any compression increases latence, with the exception of VJ, only because of the need to wait for enough data for compression to be effective, or in the case of truly binary/random data, the expansion of the data. On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:49:13PM -0500, Chris Cook wrote: > STAC compression is going to give you the lowest latency you can > enable it here: > > Ethernet -> Connections -> Your Connection -> Encaps Options -> Link > Comp=Stac-9 > > Make sure that you do that on both routers, should fix you up. > > == > Chris > > o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o > |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | > |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | > o-------------------------------------------------------------o > > > > Randy Snow wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how I might be able to improve my latency (pings) > > between my P75 at home and P50 at work? > > > > 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max = 40/50/80 ms > > > > This is the ping between both Pipelines. > > > > 50 ms seems to be my average, but I hear of many people getting 18ms > > to 25ms. I have NAT disabled, and I'm using SW +8.0-101.0+ on both > > units. I'm just curious if I have something setup wrong? > > > > Not only do I run the local network, I also enjoy playing games on > > occasion and every little bit helps. Any advice appreciated...tried > > compression changes and disabling compression. > > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sean at northrock.bm Wed Jun 13 09:42:35 2001 From: sean at northrock.bm (Sean Watkins) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:46 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Call Switching? Message-ID: Hi Does anyone have any info on call switching on a TNT 9.0.2? I believe it supports it? Basically - I have a PRI assigned 2 different numbers. I have a Channelized T1 port configured to a PBX. I want to have one particular number sent to modems/hdlc cards in the TNT. I want the other number to be sent out the channelized T1 port? Is this possible? I believe the TNT supports net-to-net switching?? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Thu Jun 14 08:25:33 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! Message-ID: Big picture: Max TNT - been in place and working for 1 1/2 to 2 years. 3 nailed t1's to central POP 5 switched t1's / 3 48mod modem cards 1 nailed t1 to remote POP 1 32idsl card (1 customer) 1 24sdsl card (serveral customers) dircode Flash card code directory: Card 1, directory size 16 4ether2-card reg good 190478 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 hdlc2-card reg good 689696 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 8t1-card reg good 208665 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 csmx-card reg good 875687 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 32idsl-card reg good 618803 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 24sdsl-data-card reg good 545552 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 shelf-controller reg good 1308931 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 Problem About every two weeks for the last few months this tnt will stop routing. What I mean by stop routing is this: x -------------- y ---------- z remote pop the tnt NOC from z I can ping, traceroute and log into y no problem. but pinging x results in massive packet loss. ping from z to y = no packet loss, t1's have no errors, etc... ping from y to x = no packet loss, t1 has no errors, etc... ping from z to x = massive packet loss! traceroutes time out at y * note: it's not only the remote pop, I'm just using it for the example, but it is all remote links behind this tnt including dial-up customers. I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... I am reluctant to update code since the revision thats on it has been working flawlessly for almost 2 years. Prior to which we had to replace the chassis and shelf controller, because they died.... Help! Anyone. Thanks :) ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Thu Jun 14 16:20:58 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010614162058.02533fa0@mail.rockriver.net> Does this have dual power supplies? I would try a power supply and/or a DRAM card. They are cheap and either could cause it. Tom At 08:25 AM 6/14/01 -0500, you wrote: >Big picture: > Max TNT - been in place and working for 1 1/2 to 2 years. > 3 nailed t1's to central POP > 5 switched t1's / 3 48mod modem cards > 1 nailed t1 to remote POP > 1 32idsl card (1 customer) > 1 24sdsl card (serveral customers) > dircode > Flash card code directory: > Card 1, directory size 16 > 4ether2-card reg good 190478 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > hdlc2-card reg good 689696 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > 8t1-card reg good 208665 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > csmx-card reg good 875687 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > 32idsl-card reg good 618803 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > 24sdsl-data-card reg good 545552 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > shelf-controller reg good 1308931 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > >Problem > About every two weeks for the last few months this tnt will stop >routing. What I mean by stop routing is this: > x -------------- y ---------- z > remote pop the tnt NOC > >from z I can ping, traceroute and log into y no problem. but pinging x >results in massive packet loss. >ping from z to y = no packet loss, t1's have no errors, etc... >ping from y to x = no packet loss, t1 has no errors, etc... >ping from z to x = massive packet loss! traceroutes time out at y >* note: it's not only the remote pop, I'm just using it for the example, >but it is all remote links behind this tnt including dial-up customers. > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... > >I am reluctant to update code since the revision thats on it has been >working flawlessly for almost 2 years. Prior to which we had to replace >the chassis and shelf controller, because they died.... > >Help! Anyone. > >Thanks :) > >***************************************** >Mick Dobra >Systems Administrator >MTCO Communications >1-800-859-6826 >***************************************** > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From adatacom at home.com Thu Jun 14 16:43:16 2001 From: adatacom at home.com (Reggie Grant) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] FS: MAX 4048 Message-ID: <3B292FF3.CC763B4F@home.com> FS: MAX 4048 We have a good inventory of these right now. Priced at $3,200 each. Warranty for 90 days. http://www.alliancedatacom.com/manufacturers/used-ascend.asp Call me toll free to discuss. Thanks, Reggie Grant Alliance Datacom 877-549-2680 Manager: Used Network Equipment Alliance Datacom, LP http://www.alliancedatacom.com/refurbished.asp e-mail: grant@alliancedatacom.com 828-277-7272 office in Asheville, NC fax # 209-879-5163 AOL IM address - r2mgrant Alliance Datacom Corporate Offices 3302 Miller Road, Suite 500 Garland, TX 75041 From magic at area-net.com Sat Jun 16 14:15:03 2001 From: magic at area-net.com (Terry Lee, Publisher) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX Connection Quality Message-ID: <07fe01c0f698$a56f2380$cfe6160c@areanet.com> Hello Friends, We use MAX-6000's that were shipped with v7.0.3 throughout our service, and it seems like some people get new computers and suddenly start having trouble with our service. And there are those occasional ones that end up getting better connections with our competitors who use old portmasters or worse, and it kind of makes you mad when you try to run a premium quality outfit. Are there things to look out for in these MAXes that I am missing that can cause bad connection quality or prevent connections on certain systems? I tell myself that they are the same old basic compatibility problems, but the number seems to be growing. Could it be time to update the code in these bad boys? I sure hate fixing things unless they are truly broke. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks, Terry Lee, Area-Net, Inc. magic@area-net.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Sat Jun 16 16:52:49 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX Connection Quality Message-ID: <4B62B56D0860D511802700D0B7A87BECD746@TRINIDADMOVER> Hi Terry, Try playing with the different compression settings on the MAX. If you can find a user that is having the same issues test a few dial-ins and see how the different compression settings affect their performance. Use a local connection profile for them so that you do not affect other users. Also, there is a parameter called "modem ringback" that is used sometimes by older modems. I believe that it should be 'yes' for older modems. It may cause a minor modem tone anomaly for some users but there is no performance change caused by it. I would also recommend using a good syslog service that may tell you if you have a modem card(s) that is going bad. I have had cases where the usual MAX modem debugs ('avm', 'lanport mod')showed no indication of a failing modem/modem card but the syslog detected a trend in call disconnects and terminations that pointed out a failing card. You may want to upgrade your code to 8.0.4 if you don't have any compatibility issues with it. There may be some obscure bug fix or additional setting that may make a difference. Other than that.....your guess is as good as mine. There may be some helpful info at www.808hi.com/56k. I have found this site to be an excellent resource for modem troubleshooting. Good Luck, David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Terry Lee, Publisher [mailto:magic@area-net.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 3:15 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) MAX Connection Quality Hello Friends, We use MAX-6000's that were shipped with v7.0.3 throughout our service, and it seems like some people get new computers and suddenly start having trouble with our service. And there are those occasional ones that end up getting better connections with our competitors who use old portmasters or worse, and it kind of makes you mad when you try to run a premium quality outfit. Are there things to look out for in these MAXes that I am missing that can cause bad connection quality or prevent connections on certain systems? I tell myself that they are the same old basic compatibility problems, but the number seems to be growing. Could it be time to update the code in these bad boys? I sure hate fixing things unless they are truly broke. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks, Terry Lee, Area-Net, Inc. magic@area-net.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Jun 16 16:43:59 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX Connection Quality In-Reply-To: <07fe01c0f698$a56f2380$cfe6160c@areanet.com> Message-ID: Terry, I've had the best luck with 7.0.26. I'm soon opening a new POP, and will likely try the latest firmware (9.0.2) to see how it does. I haven't tried it yet because of a few stray 4000 boxes that are no longer supported. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Terry Lee, ** Publisher ** Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 3:15 PM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) MAX Connection Quality ** ** ** Hello Friends, ** ** We use MAX-6000's that were shipped with v7.0.3 throughout our ** service, and ** it seems like some people get new computers and suddenly start having ** trouble with our service. And there are those occasional ones that end up ** getting better connections with our competitors who use old ** portmasters or ** worse, and it kind of makes you mad when you try to run a premium quality ** outfit. ** ** Are there things to look out for in these MAXes that I am ** missing that can ** cause bad connection quality or prevent connections on certain systems? I ** tell myself that they are the same old basic compatibility ** problems, but the ** number seems to be growing. Could it be time to update the code ** in these bad ** boys? I sure hate fixing things unless they are truly broke. ** ** Any help would be highly appreciated. ** ** Thanks, ** ** Terry Lee, ** Area-Net, Inc. ** magic@area-net.com ** ** ** ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Mon Jun 18 08:36:07 2001 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Multishelf v. Stacking Message-ID: I'm about to add my second TNT and I'm very confused about the difference between stacking and multishelf. It appears that stacking isn't supported in later versions of the TAOS. What I can't find is anything at all in the manuals about how to set up multishelf. I can figure out the ports and how to plug it in, do I just set the shelf selector to 2 on the second TNT and there it goes? If that's the case, do I have to set up the second TNT in any special way, or do I even have to set it up at all? Anyone know where this is covered in the manual? Thanks! -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rogers at axs4u.net Mon Jun 18 12:57:35 2001 From: rogers at axs4u.net (Roger Salisbury) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) CT1 headaches References: <005a01c0d25e$4021f560$de4eced8@axs4u.net> Message-ID: <001701c0f820$2819df40$de4eced8@axs4u.net> I still having problems getting this to work the line is currently up and running with a PM3, I have a Max 4002 running 7.0.26 that was working with PRI service. The CT1 is ESF/B8ZS wink-start, I get the line to come up and I see incoming calls, it may be a call routing issue but for the life of me I can not make sense of the documentation. This is my profile now. (slot 6 is a 16 port 56k modem card) Is there any other config for the routing ???? x Line 1... x x L1/RA .......... x x L2/RA .......... x x Sig Mode=Inband ^x x 12345678901234 x x 12345678901234 x x NFAS ID num=N/A x x .............. x x .............. x x Rob Ctl=Wink-Start x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Switch Type=N/A x x90-100 Sessions ??x x00-200 10:43:38 ??x x Framing Mode=ESF x x> 0 Active x x>M31 Line 00 Ch 00 x x Encoding=B8ZS x x x x No Trunk Available x x FDL=None x x x x x x Length=N/A x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Buildout=0 dB x x90-300 WAN Stat ??x x90-400 Ether Stat ??x x Clock Source=Yes x x>Rx Pkt: 0^x x>Rx Pkt: 153869 x x Collect DNIS/ANI=No x x Tx Pkt: 0 x x Tx Pkt: 90017 x x Pbx Type=N/A x x CRC: 931vx x Col: 2 x x >Delete Digits=N/A x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Add Number=N/A x x00-100 Sys Option ??x xMain Status Menu ??x x Call-by-Call=N/A x T1-PRI:PRI # Type=Unknown x x .............. x x .............. x x T1-PRI:NumPlanID =ISDN x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Ans #=N/A x x90-100 Sessions ??x x00-200 10:43:38 ??x x Ans Service=N/A x x> 0 Active x x>M31 Line 00 Ch 00 x x Input Sample count=N/A x x x x No Trunk Available x x Send Disc=0 x x x x x x Overlap Receiving=N/A x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x PRI Prefix #=N/A x x90-300 WAN Stat ??x x90-400 Ether Stat ??x x Trailing Digits=N/A x x>Rx Pkt: 0^x x>Rx Pkt: 154010 x x T302 Timer=N/A x x Tx Pkt: 0 x x Tx Pkt: 90206 x x Ch 1=Switched x x CRC: 931vx x Col: 2 x x Ch 1 #= x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Ch 1 Slot=6 x x00-100 Sys Option ??x xMain Status Menu ??x x Ch 1 Prt/Grp=0 vx x>Security Prof: 1 ^x x>00-000 System ^x Ch 1 TrnkGrp=N/A x x .............. x x .............. x x Ch 2=Switched x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Ch 2 #= x x90-100 Sessions ??x x00-200 10:43:38 ??x x Ch 2 Slot=6 x x> 0 Active x x>M31 Line 00 Ch 00 x x >Ch 2 Prt/Grp=0 x x x x No Trunk Available x x Ch 2 TrnkGrp=N/A x x x x x x Ch 3=Switched x lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk x Ch 3 #= x x90-300 WAN Stat ??x x90-400 Ether Stat ??x x Ch 3 Slot=6 x x>Rx Pkt: 0^x x>Rx Pkt: 154076 x x Ch 3 Prt/Grp=0 x x Tx Pkt: 0 x x Tx Pkt: 90288 x x Ch 3 TrnkGrp=N/A x x CRC: 931vx x Col: 2 x ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Salisbury" To: "Ascend-Users@Max.Bungi.Com" Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:46 AM Subject: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches > We haveonly done PRI on the MAX's before but this are does not have ISDN > service. I am having a real tough time trying to get this to work. > > Could someone please share their setup?? > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Jun 18 15:35:57 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Multishelf v. Stacking Message-ID: <05365FF00164D511907700D0B7A87D970374D2@TRINIDADMOVER> The shelf dial numbers are to be set as you stated but you need a Lucent/Ascend Proprietary cable to link both shelves through the uplink ports on the Shelf Controller. If you look for documentation for 6.0.x code, you should find all of the info there. I would not recommend you implement this, though as you may lose both of your TNT's if one crashes. Stacking is uses to rollover Multichannel connections on 2 or more separate chassis. In other words, If you have a MPP user that has a base ch count of 4 but there are only 2 channels available on the 1st shelf, the user will get the other 2 channels from lines on another chassis that has like trunk configurations. Thus getting all 4 of his channels from 2 different boxes. Good Luck, David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:36 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Multishelf v. Stacking I'm about to add my second TNT and I'm very confused about the difference between stacking and multishelf. It appears that stacking isn't supported in later versions of the TAOS. What I can't find is anything at all in the manuals about how to set up multishelf. I can figure out the ports and how to plug it in, do I just set the shelf selector to 2 on the second TNT and there it goes? If that's the case, do I have to set up the second TNT in any special way, or do I even have to set it up at all? Anyone know where this is covered in the manual? Thanks! -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From everett at pgweb.com Tue Jun 19 00:40:10 2001 From: everett at pgweb.com (shawn everett) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question Message-ID: We have a MAX 4000 with ~30 dial-up lines. We would like to sell off 10 of them to another "virtual isp." Is it possible to configure the Max so that 10 of the lines authenticate using one ISP's radius server while the other lines authenticate using another ISP's radius server? On another note can we configure 10 of the lines to answer on one number while the other lines answer on another? Finally, instead of PPP access can we configure the 10 lines to present a login prompt to a unix server? (dialup shell accounts) If this isn't possible using the MAX 4000, is it possible with anything in the Ascend MAX family? Thanks for any help you can provide. Shawn ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rocca at multiboard.com Tue Jun 19 01:19:58 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches In-Reply-To: <200106190545.WAA02540@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <000801c0f887$dd73c880$21a92740@mshome.net> > The CT1 is ESF/B8ZS wink-start, I get the line to come up and I > calls, it may be a call routing issue but for the life of me I > can not make sense of the documentation. > This is my profile now. > (slot 6 is a 16 port 56k modem card) > Is there any other config for the routing ???? If you're getting an 'assigned to port' and then disconnected then it sounds like a slot routing problem. We use slot 0 defined for all the line configs, that way it will take any appropriate card and rotates the modems better, however if slot 6 is a 16-56K and you have a load that supports that card, then slot 6 should work too (for the first 16 channels) -- I'd suggest giving slot 0 a try though, makes configuration a lot easier and also it enables you to handle a reduced load rather than being out of service if one of your modem cards die. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Jun 19 03:23:27 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010619032327.01e0e944@mail.rockriver.net> Setting up my first ever TNT with 9.0-159.0. It has one 8 port CT1 card and 2 96 port Multi-DSP cards. Everything appears top be set correctly but it is not forwarding packets. netstat -r shows the pool assigned IP addresses and routes. The default route is there. From admin, I can ping all addresses inside and out. But from the outside, I can't ping past the ethernet port. And from the dial-in, I can't ping past the ethernet port. I am using the CLI and current docs. My previous set-ups have been 6096 Maxen. My routing experience tells me that this is not forwarding packets but I think I have covered all the docs. Has anyone stumbled across this before? I am sure it will be some stupid thing that I overlooked. Any help would be appreciated. I am getting too many nights without sleep over this. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Jun 19 03:26:04 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work - radius Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010619032604.01fa1b60@mail.rockriver.net> BTW I am using radius for authentication. My 56k dial-in profiles look like this: mynameis Password = "123456" User-Service = Framed-User, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Framed-Routing = None, Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 1, Ascend-Idle-Limit = 1800, Ascend-Maximum-Time = 43200, Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 1 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From scopeland at pldi.net Tue Jun 19 08:21:48 2001 From: scopeland at pldi.net (Steven Copeland) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches In-Reply-To: <000801c0f887$dd73c880$21a92740@mshome.net> Message-ID: Peter, I'm going to disagree with you. You can only use Slot 0 if you are using PRI and he is using CT1. Let me explain. In the PRI world, the D channel does all of the signaling and call setup so it tells the max whether or not the incoming call needs to be routed to the digital control processor on the max for an ISDN call or to a modem for an analog call. The default setting to allow this is slot=0. Now with a Channelized T-1 there is no D channel to tell the max how to handle the call. You must tell your max what slot your modems are on so it can hand off the call to an analog modem. My suggestion (and the manuals) would be to set all of the channels on the max to slot 3. I.e. "ch 1 slot=3", "ch 2 slot=3" and so forth for all 24 channels on the T-1. setting as below. x Ch 1=Switched x Ch 1 #= x Ch 1 Slot=3 x Ch 1 Prt/Grp=0 x Ch 1 TrnkGrp=N/A x Ch 2=Switched x Ch 2 #= x Ch 2 Slot=3 Now, if you are seeing the call hit the max and get an immediate busy signal, then make sure that your Telco is not sending any CLI/ANI or any digits across the T-1. If they are, you will still get the same busy signal because the max doesn't know what to do with that information so it returns a busy signal. It is an obscure statement in the users manual that drove me nuts for a month on a test machine before I finally found it. Steven Copeland Network Administrator Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. http://www.pldi.net http://www.pld.net http:/www.ptci.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Peter Rocca > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:20 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches > > > > The CT1 is ESF/B8ZS wink-start, I get the line to come up and I > > calls, it may be a call routing issue but for the life of me I > > can not make sense of the documentation. > > This is my profile now. > > (slot 6 is a 16 port 56k modem card) > > Is there any other config for the routing ???? > > If you're getting an 'assigned to port' and then disconnected > then it sounds > like a slot routing problem. > > We use slot 0 defined for all the line configs, that way it will take any > appropriate card and rotates the modems better, however if slot 6 is a > 16-56K and you have a load that supports that card, then slot 6 > should work > too (for the first 16 channels) -- I'd suggest giving slot 0 a try though, > makes configuration a lot easier and also it enables you to > handle a reduced > load rather than being out of service if one of your modem cards die. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From valli at ee.iitm.ernet.in Tue Jun 19 05:37:38 2001 From: valli at ee.iitm.ernet.in (Valli Madhavi R(MS)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: Hello I am working on RAS software.I have a problem as stated below. I have two RASes. I need to communicate between he 2 RASes. RAS A has to inform RAS B the IP address of the user that dials to RAS A.How do i do it it.Any inputs is welcome. Thank U Regards Valli M.S Research Scholar IIT Madras Chennai,India -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dgravell at lucent.com Tue Jun 19 12:44:37 2001 From: dgravell at lucent.com (David Gravelle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] User needs survey Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20010619114437.00a704d0@baron.eng.ascend.com> Dear friends, As part of our mission to communicate complete, accurate, timely, and easy-to-use information, a user needs evaluation team is conducting quick, one-question surveys of Lucent InterNetworking (former Ascend) documentation users. We are certain that learning about you and how you use our APX, Stinger, TNT, and MAX products’ technical documentation will help improve it. Here is the question: "If you were getting new Lucent Edge Access equipment (like the TNT, APX, Stinger, MAX, etc.), what would be your first three technical questions?" Please respond to techcomm@lucent.com with your answer. In your email, please also let us know if you (or your organization) would like to participate in further user needs evaluation efforts such as our full (15 minutes) User Needs survey. Rest assured that this survey question is not an evaluation of you or your skills. Your answers will be tabulated anonymously and used only to help us understand the knowledge and experience of users in general. Whether you respond to the survey question, or not, Lucent Technologies appreciates customer comments about its documentation. You can always send documentation related comments to techcomm@lucent.com. Sincerely, David Gravelle and The User Needs Evaluation Team Lucent InterNetworking Technical Communications ------------------------------------------------- David Gravelle Senior Technical Writer, Technical Communications Lucent Technologies InterNetworking Systems 175 South Main Street, 6th Floor Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 799-6030 Fax: (801) 799-6000 -------------------------------------------------- From rocca at multiboard.com Tue Jun 19 12:18:12 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi Steven, My bad, you are of course correct regarding the CT1's -- my brain apparently skipped that detail when reading the problem. :-) Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Copeland [mailto:scopeland@pldi.net] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 09:22 > To: Peter Rocca; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Cc: shawn everett > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches > > > Peter, I'm going to disagree with you. You can only use Slot 0 if you are > using PRI and he is using CT1. > > Let me explain. In the PRI world, the D channel does all of the signaling > and call setup so it tells the max whether or not the incoming > call needs to > be routed to the digital control processor on the max for an ISDN > call or to > a modem for an analog call. The default setting to allow this is slot=0. > Now with a Channelized T-1 there is no D channel to tell the max how to > handle the call. You must tell your max what slot your modems > are on so it > can hand off the call to an analog modem. My suggestion (and the manuals) > would be to set all of the channels on the max to slot 3. I.e. "ch 1 > slot=3", "ch 2 slot=3" and so forth for all 24 channels on the > T-1. setting > as below. > > x Ch 1=Switched > x Ch 1 #= > x Ch 1 Slot=3 > x Ch 1 Prt/Grp=0 > x Ch 1 TrnkGrp=N/A > x Ch 2=Switched > x Ch 2 #= > x Ch 2 Slot=3 > > Now, if you are seeing the call hit the max and get an immediate busy > signal, then make sure that your Telco is not sending any CLI/ANI or any > digits across the T-1. If they are, you will still get the same busy > signal because the max doesn't know what to do with that information so it > returns a busy signal. It is an obscure statement in the users > manual that > drove me nuts for a month on a test machine before I finally found it. > > Steven Copeland > > Network Administrator > Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. > http://www.pldi.net > http://www.pld.net > http:/www.ptci.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Peter Rocca > > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:20 AM > > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) CT1 headaches > > > > > > > The CT1 is ESF/B8ZS wink-start, I get the line to come up and I > > > calls, it may be a call routing issue but for the life of me I > > > can not make sense of the documentation. > > > This is my profile now. > > > (slot 6 is a 16 port 56k modem card) > > > Is there any other config for the routing ???? > > > > If you're getting an 'assigned to port' and then disconnected > > then it sounds > > like a slot routing problem. > > > > We use slot 0 defined for all the line configs, that way it > will take any > > appropriate card and rotates the modems better, however if slot 6 is a > > 16-56K and you have a load that supports that card, then slot 6 > > should work > > too (for the first 16 channels) -- I'd suggest giving slot 0 a > try though, > > makes configuration a lot easier and also it enables you to > > handle a reduced > > load rather than being out of service if one of your modem cards die. > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sboggs at unitedbank.net Tue Jun 19 12:47:38 2001 From: sboggs at unitedbank.net (Scott Boggs) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: Message-ID: <5E2465539F4FD411AD6A00A024FF0423A14C47@MS_1> If they need to inform each other of an online IP connection, and they are both on the same subnet, I suggest using RIPv2 broadcasts. That way each RASs routing table knows how to reach all the active IPs on the subnet at any given point in time. Thanks, Scott Boggs, MCP Information Systems Manager United Bank, Zebulon GA -----Original Message----- From: Valli Madhavi R(MS) [mailto:valli@ee.iitm.ernet.in] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 6:38 AM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: Hello I am working on RAS software.I have a problem as stated below. I have two RASes. I need to communicate between he 2 RASes. RAS A has to inform RAS B the IP address of the user that dials to RAS A.How do i do it it.Any inputs is welcome. Thank U Regards Valli M.S Research Scholar IIT Madras Chennai,India -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From patrick at pa.net Tue Jun 19 13:08:10 2001 From: patrick at pa.net (Patrick Haller) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) T1 from 8T1 card to another router??? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010619180511.61AD14C86B@smtp.pa.net> Hello, Has anyone here set up synchronous PPP over a T1 from a port on an TNT 8T1 card to another router using all 24 channels (1.536mbps)? The documentation provides very few clues as how to do this, let alone confirm that it is possible. Any help, pointers, or config snippets would be much appreciated. Thanks, Patrick. +-- Patrick Haller +1 717 249 7270 Network Administrator PAdotNET http://www.pa.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Tue Jun 19 08:12:53 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of shawn everett ** Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:40 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question ** ** ** We have a MAX 4000 with ~30 dial-up lines. We would like to sell off 10 ** of them to another "virtual isp." ** ** Is it possible to configure the Max so that 10 of the lines authenticate ** using one ISP's radius server while the other lines authenticate using ** another ISP's radius server? You would need to do this with radius proxy. Trivial setup, see http://www.freeradius.org for information on this. I believe that freeradius is still in beta, but there are links and documentation for Cistron Radiusd. ** ** On another note can we configure 10 of the lines to answer on one number ** while the other lines answer on another? ** ** Finally, instead of PPP access can we configure the 10 lines to present a ** login prompt to a unix server? (dialup shell accounts) You might have luck getting calls to a different number to be immediately passed to a shell account via rlogin via call routes, but I'm not sure if it would work or not. ** ** If this isn't possible using the MAX 4000, is it possible with ** anything in ** the Ascend MAX family? Maybe with the TNT and/or APX, but I've never seen (or looked for) such options. The easiest way to do this, is with radius realms and proxy as mentioned above. Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dgravell at lucent.com Tue Jun 19 13:33:43 2001 From: dgravell at lucent.com (David Gravelle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) User needs survey Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20010619123343.00a64330@baron.eng.ascend.com> Dear friends, As part of our mission to communicate complete, accurate, timely, and easy-to-use information, a user needs evaluation team is conducting quick, one-question surveys of Lucent InterNetworking (former Ascend) documentation users. We are certain that learning about you and how you use our APX, Stinger, TNT, and MAX products’ technical documentation will help improve it. Here is the question: "If you were getting new Lucent Edge Access equipment (like the TNT, APX, Stinger, MAX, etc.), what would be your first three technical questions?" Please respond to techcomm@lucent.com with your answer. In your email, please also let us know if you (or your organization) would like to participate in further user needs evaluation efforts such as our full (15 minutes) User Needs survey. Rest assured that this survey question is not an evaluation of you or your skills. Your answers will be tabulated anonymously and used only to help us understand the knowledge and experience of users in general. Whether you respond to the survey question, or not, Lucent Technologies appreciates customer comments about its documentation. You can always send documentation related comments to techcomm@lucent.com. Sincerely, David Gravelle and The User Needs Evaluation Team Lucent InterNetworking Technical Communications ------------------------------------------------- David Gravelle Senior Technical Writer, Technical Communications Lucent Technologies InterNetworking Systems 175 South Main Street, 6th Floor Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 799-6030 Fax: (801) 799-6000 -------------------------------------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From philb at cyberlynk.net Tue Jun 19 12:55:51 2001 From: philb at cyberlynk.net (Phil Bedard) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) nailes T1s on TNT Message-ID: <20010619125551.F23358@shofixti.kr4d.com> How many nailed T1s can you reliably put on a single TNT? We are looking at putting 2 CT3s on one with a max of 56 T1s (or more fractional). You need an HDLC processor to do this as well I take it? Phil Bedard ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at salec.com Wed Jun 20 01:42:04 2001 From: ahakim at salec.com (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX 4000 Configuration Question Message-ID: <002301c0f954$1eb06660$094783d5@salec.com.eg> >Is it possible to configure the Max so that 10 of the lines authenticate >using one ISP's radius server while the other lines authenticate using >another ISP's radius server? This can be done through NavisRadius 3.2 (you can direct authentication from certain ports to another RADIUS) >On another note can we configure 10 of the lines to answer on one number >while the other lines answer on another? You can do this using DNIS menu under Ethernet/MOd Config (Explainned in the Network Configuration manual) >Finally, instead of PPP access can we configure the 10 lines to present a >login prompt to a unix server? (dialup shell accounts) You can do this by enabling Termina Server . Ethernet/ModConfig/Term Serv(Explainned in the Network Configuration manual) Ahmad El-Hakim From ahakim at link.net Wed Jun 20 01:45:51 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work Message-ID: <002f01c0f954$a5b6e5d0$094783d5@salec.com.eg> >Setting up my first ever TNT with 9.0-159.0. It has one 8 port CT1 card >and 2 96 port Multi-DSP cards. Everything appears top be set correctly but >it is not forwarding packets. netstat -r shows the pool assigned IP >addresses and routes. The default route is there. From admin, I can ping >all addresses inside and out. But from the outside, I can't ping past the >ethernet port. And from the dial-in, I can't ping past the ethernet port. Are you using Proxy-Arp or you routers know the route of the assigned pools is through the Ethernet port? Ahmad El-Hakim From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jun 20 13:16:27 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question In-Reply-To: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> References: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Troy Settle" > >** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of shawn everett >** >** We have a MAX 4000 with ~30 dial-up lines. We would like to sell off 10 >** of them to another "virtual isp." >** >** Is it possible to configure the Max so that 10 of the lines authenticate >** using one ISP's radius server while the other lines authenticate using >** another ISP's radius server? > >You would need to do this with radius proxy. Trivial setup, see >http://www.freeradius.org for information on this. I believe that >freeradius is still in beta, but there are links and documentation for >Cistron Radiusd. This is probably the easiest way, but I don't think you'll be able to restrict the number of lines to 10--unless all accounts using the 10 lines get their IP address from a dedicated 10-address pool. VRouters would provide more flexibility, but they are not available on the 4000 series. VRouters would allow you to assign lines to a VRouter, and then let the virtual ISP manage the entire VRouter themselves, as they see fit. If that's what you want. Download the docs for a newer router and read up on VRouters to see what's possible. I don't know if one can assign RADIUS servers per VRouter. If not, you'd still need to use a RADIUS proxy in addition to VRouters. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jun 20 13:08:12 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) T1 from 8T1 card to another router??? In-Reply-To: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> References: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Patrick Haller > >Has anyone here set up synchronous PPP over a T1 from a port on an TNT >8T1 card to another router using all 24 channels (1.536mbps)? The >documentation provides very few clues as how to do this, let alone >confirm that it is possible. 1) Assign the channels you want to nail up to the same trunk-group in the T1 profile. 2) Create a PPP profile with PPP encaps, call-type ft1, the nailed group you assigned, and data-service 64k-clear. To wit (only parameters relevant to this are shown; others are up to you): new T1 set line-interface frame-type = esf set line-interface encoding = b8zs set line-interface channel-config 1 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 1 nailed-group = 8 set line-interface channel-config 2 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 2 nailed-group = 8 ... set line-interface channel-config 23 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 23 nailed-group = 8 set line-interface channel-config 24 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 24 nailed-group = 8 write -f ; new CONNECTION set encapsulation-protocol = ppp set telco-options call-type = ft1 set telco-options nailed-groups = 8 set telco-options data-service = 64k-clear set mp-options enabled = no write -f -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Wed Jun 20 13:21:01 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work In-Reply-To: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> References: <200106200545.WAA08494@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: ISPstuff > >Setting up my first ever TNT with 9.0-159.0. It has one 8 port CT1 card >and 2 96 port Multi-DSP cards. Everything appears top be set correctly but >it is not forwarding packets. netstat -r shows the pool assigned IP >addresses and routes. The default route is there. From admin, I can ping >all addresses inside and out. But from the outside, I can't ping past the >ethernet port. And from the dial-in, I can't ping past the ethernet port. >I am using the CLI and current docs. My previous set-ups have been 6096 >Maxen. > >My routing experience tells me that this is not forwarding packets but I >think I have covered all the docs. Has anyone stumbled across this before? > I am sure it will be some stupid thing that I overlooked. The stupid thing I always forget is to set the system-ip-addr in ip-global. Without it, addresses can originate from an address that other devices don't know how to reach, creating a difficult situation to troubleshoot. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From m.pieratt at liant.com Wed Jun 20 14:26:38 2001 From: m.pieratt at liant.com (Mark L. Pieratt) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) how can i join this list? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010620142626.03827ec0@mailhost2.liant.com> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Martin at piproperty.co.uk Wed Jun 20 10:42:16 2001 From: Martin at piproperty.co.uk (Martin Isles) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <5BAD7D8E3B1AB7438A246C2C577143E715CE2C@PIPMAIL.piproperty.co.uk> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From roddy at staff.satlink.com.au Wed Jun 20 19:34:49 2001 From: roddy at staff.satlink.com.au (Roddy Strachan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Interference with Onramp 30s? Message-ID: <002901c0f9e9$faba8d80$1e00a8c0@glasgowrangers.com.tj> Hi, Just a quick question, we have had Telstra/NDC monitor 3 of our Onramp 30 connections at a remote POP for a few days now, the report has came back with the problems being past the NT1 into our equipment. We are using Lucent Max 3000's down there. Suggestions the guy said was to change the patch cables we are currently using.. Any other suggestions on what could be causing it?? --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Wed Jun 20 10:27:57 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20010614162058.02533fa0@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: Power supplies? Hmmm, the power doesn't go out. Could a bad power supply cause routing problems? I've run fsck's on the flash card and it passes. Does replacing the DRAM card require a complete code and config update? On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, ISPstuff wrote: > Does this have dual power supplies? I would try a power supply and/or a > DRAM card. They are cheap and either could cause it. > > Tom > > At 08:25 AM 6/14/01 -0500, you wrote: > >Big picture: > > Max TNT - been in place and working for 1 1/2 to 2 years. > > 3 nailed t1's to central POP > > 5 switched t1's / 3 48mod modem cards > > 1 nailed t1 to remote POP > > 1 32idsl card (1 customer) > > 1 24sdsl card (serveral customers) > > dircode > > Flash card code directory: > > Card 1, directory size 16 > > 4ether2-card reg good 190478 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > hdlc2-card reg good 689696 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 8t1-card reg good 208665 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > csmx-card reg good 875687 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 32idsl-card reg good 618803 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 24sdsl-data-card reg good 545552 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > shelf-controller reg good 1308931 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > > >Problem > > About every two weeks for the last few months this tnt will stop > >routing. What I mean by stop routing is this: > > x -------------- y ---------- z > > remote pop the tnt NOC > > > >from z I can ping, traceroute and log into y no problem. but pinging x > >results in massive packet loss. > >ping from z to y = no packet loss, t1's have no errors, etc... > >ping from y to x = no packet loss, t1 has no errors, etc... > >ping from z to x = massive packet loss! traceroutes time out at y > >* note: it's not only the remote pop, I'm just using it for the example, > >but it is all remote links behind this tnt including dial-up customers. > > > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors > >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > > > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This > >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent > >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... > > > >I am reluctant to update code since the revision thats on it has been > >working flawlessly for almost 2 years. Prior to which we had to replace > >the chassis and shelf controller, because they died.... > > > >Help! Anyone. > > > >Thanks :) > > > >***************************************** > >Mick Dobra > >Systems Administrator > >MTCO Communications > >1-800-859-6826 > >***************************************** > > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at salec.com Thu Jun 21 01:33:25 2001 From: ahakim at salec.com (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <003001c0fa1c$13a01360$094783d5@salec.com.eg> >I am working on RAS software.I have a problem as stated below. >I have two RASes. I need to communicate between he 2 RASes. RAS A has to >inform RAS B the IP address of the user that dials to RAS A.How do i do it >it.Any inputs is welcome. If you want to do it dynamically you can use RIP2 if they are on the same LAN and OSPF if they are on different LANs. Still you can do it statically through gateway routers if you want to off-load the routing engines of your RASs Ahmad El-Hakim From MPuras at solunet.com Tue Jun 19 11:14:48 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) VSA's on Maxes Message-ID: <05365FF00164D511907700D0B7A87D97032D70@TRINIDADMOVER> Hello! I have a Max 3000 that I am trying to get it not to send the Vendor Specific Attributes (VSAs) to the Radius server. I have set my setting to use the "old" mode which as I understand it, it should not send over ANY VSA to the radius server accounting server if it is set to this mode. The accounting server although it will see the the VSA it can not use them for the type of application is running. The radius server is running on Redhat Linux. I have added the Ascend dictionary but like I said, I cant use it. I need the Max to send attribute 49 (Account Termination Code) instead of the Ascend Termination code. Has anyone experience this or can explain the mode types (old, vsa 8 bit, and vsa 16 bit) if I am misunderstanding them. Thanks! Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Network Support Engineer We don't make network products, we make them Work! Mailto:mpuras@solunet.com 888.SOLUNET (Canada) / 888.449.5766 (USA) ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hkruell at swd-ag.de Thu Jun 21 07:31:39 2001 From: hkruell at swd-ag.de (hkruell) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend MAX-TNT and V110 Protocol Message-ID: <005701c0fa4e$1f3fc580$15821ec1@NB10525W2K> Hello, my need is to provide remote-access for Handy-Users with my MAX-TNT. But for that i need to have the V.110 protocol does anyone know how i can do this? Heribert Kruell Remote Access Admin Stadtwerke Duesseldorf AG Germany ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Thu Jun 21 08:35:13 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) VSA's on Maxes References: <05365FF00164D511907700D0B7A87D97032D70@TRINIDADMOVER> Message-ID: <3B31F811.8C162B56@lucentradius.com> MPuras@solunet.com wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a Max 3000 that I am trying to get it not to send the Vendor > Specific Attributes (VSAs) to the Radius server. I have set my setting to > use the "old" mode which as I understand it, it should not send over ANY VSA Ols mode just sends the attributes in the RFC attributes space instead of the VSA attribute space. When in OLD mode you are in an RFC violation mode and some of the ascend attribute numbers will conflict with RFC attribute numbers. The MAX will always send the Ascend- attributes regardless of the setting. It just changes how they are sent. -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rwdozier at apex2000.net Thu Jun 21 08:31:27 2001 From: rwdozier at apex2000.net (Bob Dozier) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000 fatal error log Message-ID: <001b01c0fa56$79b4d700$154212cf@apex2000.net> Anyone have any suggestions about how to correct this? This happens on just a few Max 6000's - others run for months with no fatalhistory entries. Thanks! ERROR_UNEXPECTED = Warning 179 indicates an anomalous event order occurred in terminating a digital call. Normally, a digital call can terminate in an anomalous event order and not cause harm. Warning 179 provides debug information in the unlikely event of a fatal error immediately following the warning. WARNING: Index: 179 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 6.1.7 Date: 06/20/2001. Time: 05:48:39 Location: b0147580 b0147644 b030ba78 b030bf64 b030d84c b014a870 WARNING: Index: 179 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 6.1.7 Date: 06/20/2001. Time: 05:48:39 Location: b0147580 b0147644 b030ba78 b030bf64 b030d84c b014a870 WARNING: Index: 179 Load: tbaxkh.m60 Revision: 6.1.7 Date: 06/20/2001. Time: 05:48:39 Location: b0147580 b0147644 b030ba78 b030bf64 b030d84c b014a870 _____________________________________________________________________ Bob Dozier rwdozier@apex2000.net Apex 2000 Internet Services Corporation Phone: (915) 570-1676 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nikolay at smartcom.bg Thu Jun 21 11:05:31 2001 From: nikolay at smartcom.bg (Nikolay P. Stamboliev) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: ascend-users-digest V96 #2304 Message-ID: Hello, anyone with an AP450 (Xedia) who knows if "sync" works fine on this device Nikolay -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:45 AM To: ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com Subject: ascend-users-digest V96 #2304 ascend-users-digest Wednesday, 20 June 19101 Volume 96 : Number 2304 In this issue: Re: (ASCEND) T1 from 8T1 card to another router??? Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question Re: (ASCEND) ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work (ASCEND) how can i join this list? [none] (ASCEND) Interference with Onramp 30s? Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Peter Lalor Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:08:12 -0700 Subject: Re: (ASCEND) T1 from 8T1 card to another router??? >From: Patrick Haller > >Has anyone here set up synchronous PPP over a T1 from a port on an TNT >8T1 card to another router using all 24 channels (1.536mbps)? The >documentation provides very few clues as how to do this, let alone >confirm that it is possible. 1) Assign the channels you want to nail up to the same trunk-group in the T1 profile. 2) Create a PPP profile with PPP encaps, call-type ft1, the nailed group you assigned, and data-service 64k-clear. To wit (only parameters relevant to this are shown; others are up to you): new T1 set line-interface frame-type = esf set line-interface encoding = b8zs set line-interface channel-config 1 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 1 nailed-group = 8 set line-interface channel-config 2 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 2 nailed-group = 8 ... set line-interface channel-config 23 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 23 nailed-group = 8 set line-interface channel-config 24 channel-usage = nailed-64-channel set line-interface channel-config 24 nailed-group = 8 write -f ; new CONNECTION set encapsulation-protocol = ppp set telco-options call-type = ft1 set telco-options nailed-groups = 8 set telco-options data-service = 64k-clear set mp-options enabled = no write -f - -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: Peter Lalor Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:16:27 -0700 Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Configuration Question >From: "Troy Settle" > >** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of shawn everett >** >** We have a MAX 4000 with ~30 dial-up lines. We would like to sell off 10 >** of them to another "virtual isp." >** >** Is it possible to configure the Max so that 10 of the lines authenticate >** using one ISP's radius server while the other lines authenticate using >** another ISP's radius server? > >You would need to do this with radius proxy. Trivial setup, see >http://www.freeradius.org for information on this. I believe that >freeradius is still in beta, but there are links and documentation for >Cistron Radiusd. This is probably the easiest way, but I don't think you'll be able to restrict the number of lines to 10--unless all accounts using the 10 lines get their IP address from a dedicated 10-address pool. VRouters would provide more flexibility, but they are not available on the 4000 series. VRouters would allow you to assign lines to a VRouter, and then let the virtual ISP manage the entire VRouter themselves, as they see fit. If that's what you want. Download the docs for a newer router and read up on VRouters to see what's possible. I don't know if one can assign RADIUS servers per VRouter. If not, you'd still need to use a RADIUS proxy in addition to VRouters. - -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: Peter Lalor Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:21:01 -0700 Subject: Re: (ASCEND) ip forwarding (static routes) on a TNT don't work >From: ISPstuff > >Setting up my first ever TNT with 9.0-159.0. It has one 8 port CT1 card >and 2 96 port Multi-DSP cards. Everything appears top be set correctly but >it is not forwarding packets. netstat -r shows the pool assigned IP >addresses and routes. The default route is there. From admin, I can ping >all addresses inside and out. But from the outside, I can't ping past the >ethernet port. And from the dial-in, I can't ping past the ethernet port. >I am using the CLI and current docs. My previous set-ups have been 6096 >Maxen. > >My routing experience tells me that this is not forwarding packets but I >think I have covered all the docs. Has anyone stumbled across this before? > I am sure it will be some stupid thing that I overlooked. The stupid thing I always forget is to set the system-ip-addr in ip-global. Without it, addresses can originate from an address that other devices don't know how to reach, creating a difficult situation to troubleshoot. - -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: "Mark L. Pieratt" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:26:38 -0500 Subject: (ASCEND) how can i join this list? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: Martin Isles Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:42:16 +0100 Subject: [none] ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: "Roddy Strachan" Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:34:49 +1000 Subject: (ASCEND) Interference with Onramp 30s? Hi, Just a quick question, we have had Telstra/NDC monitor 3 of our Onramp 30 connections at a remote POP for a few days now, the report has came back with the problems being past the NT1 into our equipment. We are using Lucent Max 3000's down there. Suggestions the guy said was to change the patch cables we are currently using.. Any other suggestions on what could be causing it?? - --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ From: mick Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:27:57 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! Power supplies? Hmmm, the power doesn't go out. Could a bad power supply cause routing problems? I've run fsck's on the flash card and it passes. Does replacing the DRAM card require a complete code and config update? On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, ISPstuff wrote: > Does this have dual power supplies? I would try a power supply and/or a > DRAM card. They are cheap and either could cause it. > > Tom > > At 08:25 AM 6/14/01 -0500, you wrote: > >Big picture: > > Max TNT - been in place and working for 1 1/2 to 2 years. > > 3 nailed t1's to central POP > > 5 switched t1's / 3 48mod modem cards > > 1 nailed t1 to remote POP > > 1 32idsl card (1 customer) > > 1 24sdsl card (serveral customers) > > dircode > > Flash card code directory: > > Card 1, directory size 16 > > 4ether2-card reg good 190478 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > hdlc2-card reg good 689696 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 8t1-card reg good 208665 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > csmx-card reg good 875687 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 32idsl-card reg good 618803 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > 24sdsl-data-card reg good 545552 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > shelf-controller reg good 1308931 Dec 8 1999 7.2.3e4 > > > >Problem > > About every two weeks for the last few months this tnt will stop > >routing. What I mean by stop routing is this: > > x -------------- y ---------- z > > remote pop the tnt NOC > > > >from z I can ping, traceroute and log into y no problem. but pinging x > >results in massive packet loss. > >ping from z to y = no packet loss, t1's have no errors, etc... > >ping from y to x = no packet loss, t1 has no errors, etc... > >ping from z to x = massive packet loss! traceroutes time out at y > >* note: it's not only the remote pop, I'm just using it for the example, > >but it is all remote links behind this tnt including dial-up customers. > > > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors > >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > > > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This > >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent > >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... > > > >I am reluctant to update code since the revision thats on it has been > >working flawlessly for almost 2 years. Prior to which we had to replace > >the chassis and shelf controller, because they died.... > > > >Help! Anyone. > > > >Thanks :) > > > >***************************************** > >Mick Dobra > >Systems Administrator > >MTCO Communications > >1-800-859-6826 > >***************************************** > > > >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ------------------------------ End of ascend-users-digest V96 #2304 ************************************ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++ To unsubscribe: "echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com" Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From boris at bulnet.bg Thu Jun 21 12:46:18 2001 From: boris at bulnet.bg (boris@bulnet.bg) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) R2 signalling on Max 4000 E1 Message-ID: <3B3232EA.414A9F6D@bulnet.bg> Hi all - we just bought a couple of Max 4000's and set them up at remote POP's - but, as we did this, i found out that the R2 signalling option for the Sig Mode of the trunk lines isn't installed on these units. Question: How do i install it? Thanks, Boris B. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nikolay at smartcom.bg Thu Jun 21 12:03:50 2001 From: nikolay at smartcom.bg (Nikolay P. Stamboliev) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: Hello, anyone with an AP450 (Xedia) who knows if "sync" works fine on this device Nikolay ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Thu Jun 21 12:21:26 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (David Pascarella) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) R2 signaling on Max 4000 E1 Message-ID: <05365FF00164D511907700D0B7A87D970374E6@TRINIDADMOVER> You will need to purchase a hash key to enable that feature. David Pascarella, MCSE CCNA A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET, Inc. 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: boris@bulnet.bg [mailto:boris@bulnet.bg] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1:46 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) R2 signalling on Max 4000 E1 Hi all - we just bought a couple of Max 4000's and set them up at remote POP's - but, as we did this, i found out that the R2 signalling option for the Sig Mode of the trunk lines isn't installed on these units. Question: How do i install it? Thanks, Boris B. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rocca at multiboard.com Thu Jun 21 12:51:13 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MP with 7.0.26 : Max 2000 vs Max 4000 In-Reply-To: <200106210545.WAA14205@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: Anyone have any MP problems on this version with Max 2000's? We have one Max 2000 that seems to have stopped handling MP calls properly if both calls terminate in the same box. The problem seems to be that on the 2000 it never bundles the IP addresses together, whereas on the 4000 it does: Max 2000, from show users: I 359805801 1:22 3:4 48000 28800 MP[502] x.x.x.52 user I 359805802 1:4 3:9 48000 28800 MP[502] x.x.x.34 user Max 4000, from show users: I 328800437 1:10 6:5 46667 28800 MP[562] x.x.x.64 user I 328800444 1:9 6:9 48000 28800 MP[562] x.x.x.64 user I've debugged it through mptoggle/mpentry, and the only difference between the two sessions ends up in a line in mpentry: Max 2000: send: ifIx 0, count xxx, seq xxx / recv: seq xxx Max 4000: send: ifIx 1, count xxx, seq xxx / recv: seq xxx ...with the ifIx 0/1 being different. We did do a code upgrade to 7.0.26 (from 7.0.4) a while back which might coincide with the problem starting but I can't see anything in the release notes from newer versions that seems to address this problem. Anyways, thought I'd throw it out here and see if anyone experienced anything similar... Thanks. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From roddy at staff.satlink.com.au Thu Jun 21 20:24:03 2001 From: roddy at staff.satlink.com.au (Roddy Strachan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 3000 DOV? Message-ID: <001501c0faba$06526ca0$1e00a8c0@glasgowrangers.com.tj> Hi, Just wondering if anyone has came across the problem of a Max3000 not accepting DOV calls? It won't do 64K DOV, but it should do 56K DOV, our Max 6k's work no problems but I need the 3000's to do the same, the setup is exactly the same as the 6000's Any ideas?? Firmware upgrades perhaps? Basically the client, dials in and it just sits there, a finger of the box I can see a 56k Digital connection, but it won't go any further and try and verify user/pass. Change to the Max 6000 number and bingo, everything works fine. Thanks --- Cheers, R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au rod_gers1873@yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lgwarner at a-t-i.com Fri Jun 22 09:45:26 2001 From: lgwarner at a-t-i.com (Larry Warner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Problem with Max 4000 and Sprint ISDN Primarys Message-ID: <3B335A06.6080809@a-t-i.com> I set the circuit parameters to what sprint says they have provisioned the ISDN PRIs with and I get and UP UP condition, however when you dial in you get a connect and during modem training, the ISDN circuit drops sync and issues a fast busy which causes an immediate disconnect on the dialing in modem. All b channels of this ISDN-NFAS setup read ready. When I change the switch type to NI-2 or AT&T, on the 1st primary and the b channel lines on the ist primary go to an out of service condition but you can now dial in and connect to the internet. The ISDN circuit does not interupt with From tom at ispstuff.com Fri Jun 22 10:08:17 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) USR v.90 modems not connecting TNT 9.0-159.0 Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010622100817.0147c400@mail.rockriver.net> Just installed our new Max TNT yesterday running 9.0-159.0 which replaced our Max 6096 running 8.0.3. Using PRIs and NI-2. I have several USR 56k v.90 customers that cannot connect since then. They are getting 120 and 30 errors (unsupported protocol). Anybody have modem init strings to fix this or do they need firmware updates? Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mark.bell at digitaldefense.net Fri Jun 22 12:33:36 2001 From: mark.bell at digitaldefense.net (Mark Bell) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Closing UDP Ports on the Ascend P75 Message-ID: <2175AA14AAC7D31186370080AD3ADF0D29F275@exchange.ddinet.lan> Could someone please tell me how to close port 7 (UDP - echo), port 514 (UDP - syslog) and port 520 (UDP - route) on the Ascend Pipeline 75? Sorry if it's a very basic question, but I've never really messed with Ascend routers (I'm more of a Cisco guy). Thanks! Mark Mark B. Bell, CISSP Senior Security Analyst Digital Defense, Inc. http://www.digitaldefense.net 888-273-1412 From ahakim at salec.com Mon Jun 25 01:56:50 2001 From: ahakim at salec.com (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] R2 signalling on Max 4000 E1 Message-ID: <00dd01c0fd44$034c7640$094783d5@salec.com.eg> >Hi all - we just bought a couple of Max 4000's and set them up at remote >POP's - but, as we did this, i found out that the R2 signalling option >for the Sig Mode of the trunk lines isn't installed on these units. >Question: How do i install it? You need to purchase R2 hash code from Lucent to enable R2 Ahmad El-Hakim From wpiis at gte.net Mon Jun 25 07:49:29 2001 From: wpiis at gte.net (Tracey) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) resetting a Pipeline75 to factory defaults Message-ID: <3B373359.9DC4AD82@gte.net> We've upgraded from an ISDN to a DSL Ascend router and I'd like to send the ISDN router back to the Corp. Office. How can I reset the ISDN to factory defaults using the com port? -- Thanks, Tracey ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ccook at tcworks.net Mon Jun 25 14:54:13 2001 From: ccook at tcworks.net (Chris Cook) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) resetting a Pipeline75 to factory defaults References: <3B373359.9DC4AD82@gte.net> Message-ID: <3B3796E5.95332AC3@tcworks.net> Tracey wrote: > > We've upgraded from an ISDN to a DSL Ascend router and I'd like to send > the ISDN router back to the Corp. Office. > > How can I reset the ISDN to factory defaults using the com port? Connect via the com port and then use a terminal emulator program to connect to the unit. Go into Diagnostics mode and type 'fclear', then 'fsave' and 'reset'. -- Chris o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | o-------------------------------------------------------------o ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pwthoma at arkansas.net Mon Jun 25 16:13:00 2001 From: pwthoma at arkansas.net (Paul Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) resetting a Pipeline75 to factory defaults In-Reply-To: <3B3796E5.95332AC3@tcworks.net> References: <3B373359.9DC4AD82@gte.net> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010625161035.0381b040@pop3.norton.antivirus> At 02:54 PM 6/25/2001, you wrote: >Tracey wrote: > > > > We've upgraded from an ISDN to a DSL Ascend router and I'd like to send > > the ISDN router back to the Corp. Office. > > > > How can I reset the ISDN to factory defaults using the com port? > >Connect via the com port and then use a terminal emulator program to >connect to the unit. Go into Diagnostics mode and type 'fclear', then >'fsave' and 'reset'. Don't you mean 'fclear' and then 'nvr'? The 'fclear' and 'fsave' will simply cancel each other out. That is the starting of the "reccomended" process of upgrading to the newer version of code. To get to diagnostic mode you need to have full access, then hit Ctrl D - D. Paul ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ccook at tcworks.net Mon Jun 25 17:18:29 2001 From: ccook at tcworks.net (Chris Cook) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) resetting a Pipeline75 to factory defaults References: <3B373359.9DC4AD82@gte.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20010625161035.0381b040@pop3.norton.antivirus> Message-ID: <3B37B8B5.B98C8F4@tcworks.net> Paul Thomas wrote: > > Don't you mean 'fclear' and then 'nvr'? The 'fclear' and 'fsave' will > simply cancel each other out. That is the starting of the "reccomended" > process of upgrading to the newer version of code. Yes, I'm sorry, long day :) -- Chris ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dw at rosebank.com Tue Jun 26 04:22:35 2001 From: dw at rosebank.com (Dave Wilson) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:50 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 2000 Configuration Reset Message-ID: <1323.194.168.255.20.993547355.squirrel@webmail.rosebank.com> Hi people, Only just subscribed to this mailling list, after finding it a week too late. Just dropping a note to say hello (Hello!) and to ask whether any of you could tell me the 'official' way to kill a MAX 2000's configuration when you lack access to the serial port, or you're locked out. Myself and a collegue spent close to a day phoning around the world and grepping web sites for information on the procedure, to no avail. In the end, we pulled the case off, shorted every jumper for a few seconds each, and left the battery out for an hour :]. It seems to have done the trick, but at one stage the MAX went lame and didn't respond even after being returned to its previous (hardware) configuration. So basically, what is the non-destructive way of making a MAX forget itself? Thanks in advance! -dw Tech Dept Rosebank Internet Services ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Tue Jun 26 06:39:31 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] suspect & failed modems Message-ID: <00df01c0fe34$aa55d440$094783d5@salec.com.eg> Does anyone knows what happen to a modem that is moved to a failed list ? How can I remove from the failed/suspect list? I have tried to reset individual modems using 'device' command, and tried to reset the whole slot card using 'slot' card but no use. card type is : 96-MultiDSP TAOS: 8.0.4 Ahmad El-Hakim From bis_ivanov at yahoo.com Tue Jun 26 06:18:31 2001 From: bis_ivanov at yahoo.com (B Ivanov) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <20010626111831.90017.qmail@web14806.mail.yahoo.com> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pjd2 at po.cwru.edu Tue Jun 26 07:43:44 2001 From: pjd2 at po.cwru.edu (Pedro J. Diaz) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 Call Filtering Message-ID: <000001c0fe3d$a2f1f540$b4fa1ac7@mhrad.org> Hi... I have a Pipeline 75 in a simple bridge configuration (i.e. just about everything including RIP turned off and the usual call filters enabled) which initiates a call to the remote site even when there is no PC connected to its local LAN port. Any ideas as to why it would initiate a call on its own and how this might be blocked? Thanks in advance, PJD ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From denny at reiters.org Tue Jun 26 13:25:39 2001 From: denny at reiters.org (Dennis Reiter) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! In-Reply-To: ; from mdobra@mtco.com on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 10:27:57AM -0500 References: <3.0.3.32.20010614162058.02533fa0@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <20010626132539.I59184@reiters.org> Quoting mick (mdobra@mtco.com): > > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors > > >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > > > > > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This > > >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent > > >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... TNT does contain "NT". Why should that surprise you? :) Several of ours have mysteriously started sporting those Microsoft Windows compatible decals that now come attached to most computers. -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org www.scapegoats.org Nice little planet you've got there. Shame if anything were to happen to it. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gdaley at lucent.com Tue Jun 26 17:36:39 2001 From: gdaley at lucent.com (Daley, Greg (Greg)) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 Call Filtering Message-ID: wddial is the debug command which captures the packet which opens a call on the pipeline75 (may depend on the version). This will give you a hex dump of the packet. TAC may be able to decode it, but you should be able to do it by hand using the RFC's if need be. I've heard that ethereal decodes Ascend dumps, but I have never seen it work. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Pedro J. Diaz [mailto:pjd2@po.cwru.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:44 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 Call Filtering > > > Hi... > > I have a Pipeline 75 in a simple bridge configuration (i.e. just about > everything including RIP turned off and the usual call > filters enabled) > which initiates a call to the remote site even when there is no PC > connected to its local LAN port. > > Any ideas as to why it would initiate a call on its own and how this > might be blocked? > > Thanks in advance, > > PJD > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From kenk at shreve.net Tue Jun 26 22:16:28 2001 From: kenk at shreve.net (Ken Kirchner) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) resetting a Pipeline75 to factory defaults In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010625161035.0381b040@pop3.norton.antivirus> Message-ID: On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Paul Thomas wrote: > At 02:54 PM 6/25/2001, you wrote: > >Tracey wrote: > > > > > > We've upgraded from an ISDN to a DSL Ascend router and I'd like to send > > > the ISDN router back to the Corp. Office. > > > > > > How can I reset the ISDN to factory defaults using the com port? > > > >Connect via the com port and then use a terminal emulator program to > >connect to the unit. Go into Diagnostics mode and type 'fclear', then > >'fsave' and 'reset'. > > Don't you mean 'fclear' and then 'nvr'? The 'fclear' and 'fsave' will > simply cancel each other out. That is the starting of the "reccomended" > process of upgrading to the newer version of code. I've actually had it happen where the nvramclear DID NOT WORK until at least one fsave had been performed. Dont look at me. I think the whole AOS sucks. I hate their menu interface. Anyway, if the previous suggestions dont appear to work, drop into debug mode and try: fsave nvramclear reset (may be optional, not sure if nvramclear performs a reset) > To get to diagnostic mode you need to have full access, then hit Ctrl D - D. yep, thats a must! -- Ken Kirchner : kenk@shreve.net Assistant System Administrator : Tel (318)222-2638 ShreveNet, Inc. : Fax (318)213-2650 ShreveNet - Your Premium Internet Service Provider! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Wed Jun 27 04:07:13 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad El-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] suspect & failed modems Message-ID: <02c101c0fee8$8e776130$094783d5@salec.com.eg> Does anyone knows what happen to a modem that is moved to a failed list ? How can I remove from the failed/suspect list? I have tried to reset individual modems using 'device' command, and tried to reset the whole slot card using 'slot' card but no use. card type is : 96-MultiDSP TAOS: 8.0.4 Ahmad El-Hakim From mdobra at mtco.com Wed Jun 27 09:27:58 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! In-Reply-To: <20010626132539.I59184@reiters.org> Message-ID: On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Dennis Reiter wrote: > Quoting mick (mdobra@mtco.com): > > > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors > > > >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > > > > > > > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This > > > >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent > > > >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... > > TNT does contain "NT". Why should that surprise you? :) > > Several of ours have mysteriously started sporting those Microsoft > Windows compatible decals that now come attached to most computers. > > -- > Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org > www.scapegoats.org > Nice little planet you've got there. Shame if anything were to happen to it. > Well it finally took the big leap... And our Lucent sales rep was on the phone telling me that we would have to pay to call support, or she could get us a really good deal on more TNT's. Yeah right, like I'm gonna replace this shit with the same shit! So off I go to replace it with a spare TNT, hopefully temporarily. ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Wed Jun 27 08:43:22 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (mick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Creeping Max TNT death! In-Reply-To: <20010626132539.I59184@reiters.org> Message-ID: On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Dennis Reiter wrote: > Quoting mick (mdobra@mtco.com): > > > >I can not find anything wrong on the tnt. No fatal history, no t1 errors > > > >nothing. Only thing that fixes it is a reboot. > > > > > > > >I could really use some suggestions to trouble shoot the problem. This > > > >week I have had to reboot it twice already. Its like this ascend/lucent > > > >equipment has a built in "old age" death code..... > > TNT does contain "NT". Why should that surprise you? :) > > Several of ours have mysteriously started sporting those Microsoft > Windows compatible decals that now come attached to most computers. > > -- > Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org > www.scapegoats.org > Nice little planet you've got there. Shame if anything were to happen to it. > Ohh, your right there! Ascend support used to be great, and when an engineer found a problem they made a solution. Lucent is the proverbial BIG company with no need to listen to customer complaints and problems, unless you pay them to listen.... even then you are may not get a solution to your problems! We will not be buying any more Lucent equipment. So any way, I still don't have an answer to the problem. Anyone know what the warning ****** means: Marseilles>stackUsage Task ID PRI size used warning CLI session input task 79 3 4096 3268 ****** CLI session output task 78 3 3072 1284 _dnsTask 76 3 3072 528 TunnelTntTask 75 3 3072 384 greControlTask 74 3 3072 1108 _ipCacheTask 73 3 6144 1076 fingerTask 72 1 3072 384 telnetd task 71 3 3072 640 _snmpTask 70 3 6144 2276 _rip_task 69 3 4096 688 _cbCliDrvTask 66 3 2048 384 _powerSupplyTask 65 2 2048 496 _afsMsgTask 64 3 3072 404 _ipxRouterTask 63 3 6144 400 QuiesceTask 62 3 3072 400 _frrlyifTask 61 3 4096 384 _lanNailedTask 60 3 3072 2196 ****** Also, Marseilles>power Power supply A present, OK Power supply B present, OK The TNT thinks the power supplies are ok..... I don't freakin know. Just waiting to get some riverstone rs3000's to replace that box. ***************************************** Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ***************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From JRitchie at DoveBid.com Wed Jun 27 17:03:48 2001 From: JRitchie at DoveBid.com (Jeff Ritchie) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Used Acsend & Lucent TNTV Modules Message-ID: <379B5EDB2FD6D311B5B300508B607340BBA311@ox.dovebid.com> I have a large selection of used tntv modules available for sale real cheap. Does any one need any of these cards, if so please contact me Jeffrey Ritchie - Director Of Auction Services DOVEBiD, Inc. 1241 East Hillsdale Blvd. Foster City, CA 94404 650-377-2672 Office 650-572-1502 Fax 650-302-8439 Mobile Business Auctions Worldwide Buy or Sell at -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20010627/29523bb9/attachment.html From alan at westweb1.net Wed Jun 27 23:23:26 2001 From: alan at westweb1.net (Alan West) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] FT1's and MAX 4004's Message-ID: <006c01c0ff8a$1498c5a0$202f96cf@AlanWest> Greetings all - I am a new member. I am in the process of setting up a new POP (3rd) and have some configuration questions. I currently have 2 pops. Both have Cisco 2501 routers with external CSU's. I have a full class C of IP's. I have the class subnetted with a .128 mask. The lower IPs <128 are my main POP, the higher IPs >128 are my remote POP. The routers are tied together with a fractional T1. Here are my questions: I want to be able to use one of the T1 ports on my remote POP max 4004 to handle the FT1 that connects the two pops together. So, instead of looking like this: MAX-ROUTER-CSU/DSU----FT1----CSU/DSU-ROUTER-MAX (my main pop), it would look like this: MAX---FT1----CSU/DSU-ROUTER-MAX (my main pop). If this is possible, I need some instructions or a web page/site that tells how to config/setup. Is there any reason for me to have my network subnetted? Can I remove the net mask and still operate my remote POPs (especially if the above scenario will work?) I am asking all these questions so I can maybe shuffle some equipment around to give me 2 more WAN ports at my main pop, so I can expand and setup my 3rd pop. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Alan West Westweb alan@westweb1.net From panaba470 at usa.com Thu Jun 28 01:53:04 2001 From: panaba470 at usa.com (Fast Cash) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Here is your "secret code" Message-ID: <15836200164286534100@cc484152-b> To become very successful on the internet. I know you've heard that before, but we will prove it to you! Testimony from a Successful Upline! I Joined the People Helping People Downline Building Club a little over 42 Days ago and I have done very little with it. I have personally sponsored only 39 People. As of June 1st, I now have over 2089 people in PHP, that number is growing by the minute. ""WOW"" What a CLUB!! Now the best part of PHP Club is that you can do this for FREE! Remember this: "Winners never quits, quitters never win!" William Brazell If I told you that you could get PAID for doing nothing, WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME? If I told you that doing something, could PAY you even more, WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME? This is what will happen at the PHP Club!! Yes, it is true. You can choose to do nothing or choose to do something! NO SPONSORING REQUIRED! NO PHONE CALLS! NO MEETINGS! NO PRODUCT SELLING! NO INVENTORY TO STOCK! NO MAILING! NO FAXING! NO SCAMS (PHP is ran by honest, ethical people)! And over time, our active members will build your downline for you, if you choose to do nothing. For those good at marketing, and familiar with recruiting over the Internet, this program will be a GOLD MINE, if you choose to do something for yourself and are willing to learn. Plus you will see the benefits come in the form of PAYMENTS quicker! Now the best part of PHP Club is that you can do this for FREE! NO OBLIGATIONS, YOU MAY JOIN OR LEAVE WHENEVER YOU WANT! Click on my site below for more Details!! http://www.replicate99.com/PHP/3361.shtml If this program is not right for you, I will respectfully REMOVE your name from list and hope your endeavors are prosperous. May God Bless Your Proud PHP Sponsor Michael ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From panaba470 at usa.com Thu Jun 28 12:00:58 2001 From: panaba470 at usa.com (Fast Cash) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Here is your "Secret Code" Message-ID: <241072001642817058640@cc484152-b> To become very successful on the internet. I know you've heard that before, but we will prove it to you! Sorry for the last message the URL was inactive at the time. Here is an active one. http://www.thephpclub.com/members/3361/index.shtml Testimony from a Successful Upline! I Joined the People Helping People Downline Building Club a little over 42 Days ago and I have done very little with it. I have personally sponsored only 39 People. As of June 1st, I now have over 2089 people in PHP, that number is growing by the minute. ""WOW"" What a CLUB!! Now the best part of PHP Club is that you can do this for FREE! Remember this: "Winners never quits, quitters never win!" William Brazell If I told you that you could get PAID for doing nothing, WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME? If I told you that doing something, could PAY you even more, WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME? This is what will happen at the PHP Club!! Yes, it is true. You can choose to do nothing or choose to do something! NO SPONSORING REQUIRED! NO PHONE CALLS! NO MEETINGS! NO PRODUCT SELLING! NO INVENTORY TO STOCK! NO MAILING! NO FAXING! NO SCAMS (PHP is ran by honest, ethical people)! And over time, our active members will build your downline for you, if you choose to do nothing. For those good at marketing, and familiar with recruiting over the Internet, this program will be a GOLD MINE, if you choose to do something for yourself and are willing to learn. Plus you will see the benefits come in the form of PAYMENTS quicker! Now the best part of PHP Club is that you can do this for FREE! NO OBLIGATIONS, YOU MAY JOIN OR LEAVE WHENEVER YOU WANT! Click on my site below for more Details!! http://www.thephpclub.com/members/3361/index.shtml If this program is not right for you, I will respectfully REMOVE your name from list and hope your endeavors are prosperous. May God Bless Your Proud PHP Sponsor Michael ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jvenegas at adexus.cl Thu Jun 28 14:13:56 2001 From: jvenegas at adexus.cl (Jorge Venegas) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) P50 Halted Message-ID: <03256A79.0069A581.00@domino.adexus.cl> Hello any Know this message ? I can fix this pipeline 50? what? Pipeline Power-On Self Test Halted: CONFIGURE UNIT! regards ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Fri Jun 29 12:09:30 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) P50 Halted In-Reply-To: <200106290545.WAA23914@max.bungi.com> References: <200106290545.WAA23914@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Jorge Venegas" > >any Know this message ? >I can fix this pipeline 50? what? > > Pipeline > Power-On Self Test > Halted: > CONFIGURE UNIT! It's lost it's firmware. You can fix this by jumpering a jumper and muttering incantations. Search the archives (which were down a moment ago) for "pipeline" and "jumper", etc. for the exact procedure. -- Peter Lalor Infoasis plalor@infoasis.com http://www.infoasis.com/ "Where's my burrito?" -- Homer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Sat Jun 30 11:03:46 2001 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:51 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Early adopters - v.92 on TNT - don't bother In-Reply-To: References: <200106290545.WAA23914@max.bungi.com> <200106290545.WAA23914@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20010630110346.02c649ac@mail.rockriver.net> We just switched from Max 6096 to TNT with Multi-DSP cards so we could be the first on the block to offer v.92. We are seeing pretty much the same connect speeds and success rates as we did with our 6096 running 8.0.3. All I can say is that v.92 is a big waste of money so far. I picked up a USR v.92 external Sportster as a test and it won't connect to our TNT with either moh (modem on hold) or quick-connect enabled. Lucent does not support PCM-upstream in the current TAOS 9.0-159.0 that we are running. v.44 compression is the only thing that might be working. I haven't actually tested the compression yet but it doesn't affect connections when turned on. Has anyone else reading this list experimented with v.92? I am interested in hearing experience from others. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahmetk at intrakets.com.tr Sat Jun 30 13:18:34 2001 From: ahmetk at intrakets.com.tr (Ahmet KALAYCI) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:00:52 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) P50 Halted (Peter Lalor) In-Reply-To: <200106301701.f5UH13K25055@sprite.real-time.com> Message-ID: <000001c10191$70fab9d0$f9820cd4@ahmetk> No It's lost it's firmware. It's lost it's serial number. For fix this problem you must press quickly in console "Esc [ Esc =" and write like below code ; revision 0 1 10 10715452 VyWxRnZb_<;`>~ and power down-up You can obtain this code in 'emeacallcenter@lucent.com' Ahmet KALAYCI INTRAKETS Ltd.Sti. Ko?uyolu Cad. No:65 81020 Ko?uyolu/ISTANBUL URL : www.intrakets.com.tr Tel : 0 216 327 69 30 (PBX) Fax : 0 216 327 69 24