Napster uses servers to track filenames in the music library directory of
customers that are currently online. Then the file is transferred in a Peer
to Peer connection.  In is very difficult to stop the peer to peer without
boxes designed for that purpose. If you are interested in that, see
www.infosecuritymag.com for an article on the subject. It was covered in the
February 2000 issue of Information Security.  For your solution, I would put
up an access list denying any traffic to the Napster servers.  These IPs
should not be too hard to determine.  You may try contacting the Cisco TAC
for the IPs, as well.  Someone there should have the list.  At least they
did when I worked there.

Karl

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ascend-users-digest at max.bungi.com
[mailto:owner-ascend-users-digest at max.bungi.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:45 AM
To: ascend-users-digest at max.bungi.com
Subject: ascend-users-digest V96 #2212



ascend-users-digest     Wednesday, 28 February 19101    Volume 96 : Number
2212

In this issue:

(ASCEND) Blocking or limiting Napster...
(ASCEND) SuperPipe 95
(ASCEND) PipeLine 50 - Can it route/NAT to its Ethernet via two channels a
nd two connection profiles simultaneously?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Darkshot's Lists" <dfl at chudys.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:21:47 -0500
Subject: (ASCEND) Blocking or limiting Napster...

I'm in the process of waiting (and waiting) for fiber to be run so I
can upgrade my bandwidth, but am currently stuck with 2 T1's on
on PoP here that's being flooded. Since it seems that network
usage goes to the wall within 10 minutes of seeing the schoolbuses
go by the NOC ,I strongly suspect Napster of being behind this.

What I'd like, either using the MAX boxes' filtering capabilities,
or something on the Ciscos (2500 series), is to be able to
block this traffic completely for a bit to see if the problem
goes away.

Paradise has a product that's supposed to analyze traffic and tell
you what's going on, but my topology won't allow me to use it
effectively- plus, it needs to be on a "hub" and I don't have any
here. Don't have any vacuum tubes, either. ;-)

A search on the web for "Block Napster" returns nothing but tons
of material on how to get around such a thing- no clues as to how
it is done in the first place.

Is anyone on either list doing this, and if so, how? Any information
will be greatly appreciated.

'Shot
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

------------------------------

From: "Chris West" <chris at westcomm.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:23:26 -0600
Subject: (ASCEND) SuperPipe 95

Here is what I am trying to do...

I am trying to setup a VPN between 3 offices all using SuperPipe 95s.  The
main office has a server that needs to be reached from the other offices.
We are connected via ISDN lines to the public Internet.  How do I configure
the SuperPipes to do VPN?  Since this is not a permanent connection, how
does the router know that someone is trying to connect to the server that is
behind it and how does the ISDN call get initiated from the outside in?  Are
there docs somewhere that I can read on this subject?

Thanks
Chris


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

------------------------------

From: "Ben-David, Joe" <Joe.Ben-David at eurekaggn.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:45:17 -0500
Subject: (ASCEND) PipeLine 50 - Can it route/NAT to its Ethernet via two
channels a nd two connection profiles simultaneously?

Greetings,
	A dialin site has one ISDN BRI and a PipeLine 50 dialup router. They
need two routable IP addresses, one to provide NAT for the LAN, and one for
one-to-one NAT to a server to be resolvable on the Internet. Their ISP can
allocate a static IP address, one per username/password. I propose to get
two dialin accounts from the ISP, and to administer two connection profiles
in the PipeLine, one with each of the username/password pairs. Each profile
dialing in will be assigned a static IP address.

1.  Can the PipeLine route packets to the Ethernet interface from both
active connections, appearing to the Internet as both assigned gateway
addresses?

- -----------ISDN BRI B1-----------205.209.253.1                   |
					 | Pipeline 50
|--205.209.253.254---Ethernet---  205.209.253.0/24
- -----------ISDN BRI B2-----------205.209.253.2                   |


2. Can it NAT for the LAN via one connection profile and do one-to-one NAT
on the other simultaneously?



- -----------ISDN BRI B1-----------205.209.253.1|>>>NAT>>>|
192.168.20.1
					 | Pipeline 50 |-----Ethernet
- -----------ISDN BRI B2-----------205.209.253.2|>>>NAT>>>|
192.168.20.0/24



									Joe
Ben-David

Sales engineer

EurekaGGN

jben-david at eurekaggn.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

------------------------------

End of ascend-users-digest V96 #2212
************************************

++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++
To unsubscribe:
"echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request at bungi.com"
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or		<ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>