From everett at pgweb.com Thu Nov 1 13:20:15 2001 From: everett at pgweb.com (shawn everett) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4000 and MOD56 Modem Cards Message-ID: We recently purchased a couple of MAX 4000's and seperatly some MX-SL-12MOD-S56 modem cards. The max's will NOT see the modem cards. The software version of the Max is: 7.0.6e9. What's the best software version of install to get the Max to recognize these cards? Shawn ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jhandy at migkap.com Thu Nov 1 08:12:41 2001 From: Jhandy at migkap.com (Handy, Jack) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Pipeline 50 default settings... Message-ID: <766860489962D511B7700003470817300469E1@MAIL1> Here's what you do: telnet to the Pipeline and login in with full access. Press ctrl-D and when you see the menu press d for diagnostics mode. Once there you need to clear the ram on the unit by typing fclear. Ater that type "nvramclear" and hit enter. The unit will reboot automatically and be set to factory defaults. Good luck Jack jhandy@migkap.com -----Original Message----- From: Mark L. Pieratt [mailto:m.pieratt@liant.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:20 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Pipeline 50 default settings... Hi all, Someone on this list recently asked how to reset a shelf-controller to it's factory defaults. I have the same question for a Pipeline-50 isdn router. The problem I'm having is from time to time, more often than I would like to admit, two routers connected via ISDN start racking up CRC errors, shortly followed by dropping the connection. This behavior seems to occur randomly - I've already checked the line quality with Ma Bell - she says all is good there. So, I thought I would go back to square 1, and start from there. Any ideas? -any clues greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mark L. Pieratt ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gmackenz at ascend.com Fri Nov 2 01:21:23 2001 From: gmackenz at ascend.com (gordo) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: Max 4000 and MOD56 Modem Cards In-Reply-To: <200111020645.WAA14930@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: You're probably have the wrong binary on the Max 4000...Look for something with m*t*k*.bin (the "k" standing for 56k, which is the code for these modems). Try the latest 7.x code. From: shawn Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 11:20:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4000 and MOD56 Modem Cards We recently purchased a couple of MAX 4000's and seperatly some MX-SL-12MOD-S56 modem cards. The max's will NOT see the modem cards. The software version of the Max is: 7.0.6e9. What's the best software version of install to get the Max to recognize these cards? Shawn -- Gordon Mackenzie (510) 747-2790 Software Quality Assurance < Alameda < Access Engineering < INS < Lucent mailto:gordo@lucent.com http://www.lucent.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From scott at aobe.com Fri Nov 2 10:50:50 2001 From: scott at aobe.com (Scott Starbuck) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) BACP Ascend / Cisco Message-ID: <3BE2CEEA.7B0C7C88@aobe.com> Hello, Our ISP has recently replaced their Ascend equipment with Cisco. The multi-link bandwidth on demand on our P75 does not function with the Cisco. I have changed the MPP setting to MP and also turned on BACP, and tried various combinations of no VJ or STAC compression. Nothing I have tried will let the P75 add or drop channels automatically. I can set the Base Channel count to two and connect with both - just can't get it to add and drop automatically. I have talked to the ISP and they are aware of the problem and "working with Cisco engineers to resolve" but I don't get the feeling this is a very big issue on their list as it has been going on several months. We've been through similar problems with other equipment and have always been able to get it going with some configuration changes, but not this time. Has anyone else experienced this problem and do you know of any combination of settings or different software version that will fix this problem? Currently using ver 6.0.13 on the old ver P75, I believe the Cisco is a AS5300 or similar, can probably find out the equipment and version they are on if necessary but they seem to dodge that question any time I ask. Either the person I'm talking to doesn't know or care to find out, but I could probably find out if necessary. Thanks for any info, Scott Starbuck Aobe Network Group 5340 Millertown Pike, Suite 131 Knoxville, TN 37924 phone: 865-689-7290 fax: 865-688-0068 e-mail: scott@aobe.com ---------------------- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From howardl at abs.net Fri Nov 2 11:09:45 2001 From: howardl at abs.net (Howard Leadmon) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 32M JEDEC RAM Card for Max TNT?? Message-ID: <000901c163c1$2bd79070$0f0572cf@abs.net> Hi all, I am new to this list, but wanted to see if anyone could give me any pointers. I have an Ascend Max TNT we acquired, but it has an older OS on it, and from what I can see to get to 7.2 or later I need the 32M RAM Card for expansion. Well I may not be a rocket scientist, but when I looked up that Lucent part number, that card via distribution was like $1000 in price. That seems crazy for a 32M card, unless it's so proprietary that only Lucent can make it. Does anyone know where I can find this beast and not pay and arm and a leg for 32M RAM?? --- Howard Leadmon - howardl@abs.net - http://www.abs.net ABSnet Internet Services - Phone: 410-361-8160 - FAX: 410-361-8162 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MPuras at solunet.com Fri Nov 2 16:29:05 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:18 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Test Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFB8C@trinidad.solunet.com> Just testing! Mario Puras JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP SoluNet Technical Support Customer Support Engineer ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Sun Nov 4 13:05:24 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:19 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) 32M JEDEC RAM Card for Max TNT?? In-Reply-To: <200111030645.WAA20426@max.bungi.com> References: <200111030645.WAA20426@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: "Howard Leadmon" > > Hi all, I am new to this list, but wanted to see if anyone could give >me any pointers. I have an Ascend Max TNT we acquired, but it has an >older OS on it, and from what I can see to get to 7.2 or later I need >the 32M RAM Card for expansion. Well I may not be a rocket scientist, >but when I looked up that Lucent part number, that card via distribution >was like $1000 in price. That seems crazy for a 32M card, unless it's >so proprietary that only Lucent can make it. > > Does anyone know where I can find this beast and not pay and arm and a >leg for 32M RAM?? I purchased a unit made by Smart Modular from http://www.allamerican.com/ for under $200 in early '99. Works fine. -- Peter Lalor ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From aaghaz00 at yahoo.com Mon Nov 5 12:57:36 2001 From: aaghaz00 at yahoo.com (Mohsin Khan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:19 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend-First-Dest Message-ID: <20011105185736.32938.qmail@web10105.mail.yahoo.com> a-o-a The frist and the fresh postto this list. can any 1 tell me what this entry mean ATTRIBUTE Ascend-First-Dest 189 ipaddr and I can see this my logs as Ascend-First-Dest=ip_add_not_in_my_pool ===== Regards, Mohsin Khan >>>Happy is the who can smile<<< __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com From vrehn at lucent.com Mon Nov 5 12:56:35 2001 From: vrehn at lucent.com (Victoria Rehn) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:19 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 32M JEDEC RAM Card for Max TNT Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20011105105134.0368a010@gromit.eng.ascend.com> Folks, I want to share a caution about non-approved JDEC or Flash cards -- they may melt and smoke in extreme conditions. Before releasing the Ascend/Lucent versions, we tested many modules. Only the expensive variety didn't fail the standard "shake & bake" tests. vikki ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Richard.Lewis at cwcom.cwplc.com Mon Nov 5 12:51:11 2001 From: Richard.Lewis at cwcom.cwplc.com (Lewis, Richard) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:19 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Windows 2000 MPPP Compression causes dropped connections Message-ID: <40FF92075905D51194D900508B64882F026BF1A9@gbcwcwarm005.isops.cwcom.co.uk> Hi, Anyone seen this? MAX4000 on TAOS 6.1.24 (it's on old code for a good reason..). If you dial in (analogue) with Win2000, and the "Use Multilink on Single Connections" option set (which is default), the connection gets dropped just after IPCP completion (Disconnect cause 185). Occasionally it works but most often it fails. If you tell Win2000 not to use MPPP, it works OK with compression. If you tell Win2000 to use MPPP, and turn off compression, it works OK. So I'm pretty certain a T1 MAX4000 (fbtk.m40) has problems with Windows 2000 clients using Multilink and compression (the defaults). On our other MAXen (4000 and 6000), all 6.1.24 (but not all T1 like this one), it works OK with Win2000 and MPPP and compression. I know Ciscos have throughput problems due to fragmentation, but this actually causes immediate connection drop just after IPCP comes up. Of course, for a discontinued model running out-of-support code, I guess most of you won't lose much sleep over this one! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Richard Lewis Senior Engineer Cable & Wireless IP Network Services Waterside House Longshot Lane Bracknell Berks RG12 1XL Tel: +44 (0) 1344 704312 Email: richard.lewis@cw.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ********************************************************************** This message may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. ********************************************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From aaghaz00 at yahoo.com Tue Nov 6 13:10:45 2001 From: aaghaz00 at yahoo.com (Mohsin Khan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:19 2005 Subject: [Ascend] two Caller-ids in a single profile Message-ID: <20011106191045.99786.qmail@web10108.mail.yahoo.com> a-o-a Can I set up two CLIs for a single user, or in a profile??? ===== Regards, Mohsin Khan >>>Happy is the who can smile<<< __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com From davidharder at onlineok.com Tue Nov 6 21:22:14 2001 From: davidharder at onlineok.com (David) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] max 4004 pri and pipe75 config please help Message-ID: <000101c1673b$65883040$389d7b40@ook26> Hello I am trying to feed the internet from the pipe 75 to the max4004 pri and allow users that dial in the pri to use the feed from the pipe 75. I have the internet traffic working on the lan at the max 4004 but modem users on the max can access the lan at the max but not the internet feed or the pipe75. Lan ---- max 4004 ----- pri ----- pipe75 --- internet Modems --------I Thanks David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011106/aa7810f2/attachment.html From Maxim789 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 6 16:37:01 2001 From: Maxim789 at hotmail.com (Maxim789) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Help with routing Message-ID: I've run into a problem, something wrong with my routing table in MAX I have two routes: one "default" and another one that i've made. here's the config from them: I've changed real IPs to 1.2.3.4 Name=Default Active=Yes Dest=0.0.0.0/0 Gateway=1.2.3.4 Metric=1 Preference=100 Private=No Virtual Router=N/A Dest VRouter=N/A Name=Default Active=Yes Dest=1.2.3.4 Gateway=1.2.3.4. Metric=8 Preference=60 Private=No Virtual Router=N/A Dest VRouter=N/A From ahakim at salec.com Wed Nov 7 02:06:17 2001 From: ahakim at salec.com (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: Ascend-First-Dest Message-ID: This is the ip address of the first destination the user accessed (may be a web page or ftp site ). Ahmad EL-Hakim From ahakim at link.net Thu Nov 8 01:39:04 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Help with routing Message-ID: What is the problem exactly. Ahmad EL-Hakim From brian at net-port.com Thu Nov 8 08:43:46 2001 From: brian at net-port.com (Brian Goodenow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 4048 Message-ID: <000001c16863$c7e1ce80$0cabad3f@netport.com> Anyone available on a contract basis to help with a MAX4048? The box sits at a remote POP and handles incoming calls. We backhaul traffic to our office via a dedicated 56K line. I have a new T1 installed to take the place of the 56K, but I can?t get the MAX to see it. I?m sure it?s a simple configuration issue, but can?t seem to nail it down. Thank you. Brian Goodenow Net-port 110 N Michigan Ave Big Rapids, MI 49307 231.592.9877 www.net-port.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011108/9d0fbd71/attachment.htm From Gary.Wilcox at cacky.com Thu Nov 8 14:39:58 2001 From: Gary.Wilcox at cacky.com (Wilcox, Gary) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <7448CD07DB93D511B1F20008C7CF5A054654DA@commonsvr01> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Holger.Steppke at team4m.de Thu Nov 8 15:32:28 2001 From: Holger.Steppke at team4m.de (Holger Steppke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) 4048 In-Reply-To: <000001c16863$c7e1ce80$0cabad3f@netport.com> Message-ID: Hi, have you running the right code wich supports T1 ? I could remember that we had to use a code for E1s that is different from the one for T1. Once the right code is there i guess you have enabled the line with the right framing and CRC ? What do you see on the box for the T1 in the Status field. LA/RA/ or even nothing ? Bye -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Brian Goodenow Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:44 PM To: Ascend-Users Subject: (ASCEND) 4048 Anyone available on a contract basis to help with a MAX4048? The box sits at a remote POP and handles incoming calls. We backhaul traffic to our office via a dedicated 56K line. I have a new T1 installed to take the place of the 56K, but I can?t get the MAX to see it. I?m sure it?s a simple configuration issue, but can?t seem to nail it down. Thank you. Brian Goodenow Net-port 110 N Michigan Ave Big Rapids, MI 49307 231.592.9877 www.net-port.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011108/a9c92afe/attachment.html From cricky at webfront.net.au Thu Nov 8 17:11:39 2001 From: cricky at webfront.net.au (Michael J Crick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Fans Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20011109101014.02a0a478@mail.webfront.net.au> Could anyone tell me were i can purchase 24 volt exhaust fans for a MAX 4000 in Australia Michael ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sfcxx at brazilmail.com.br Thu Nov 8 20:04:59 2001 From: sfcxx at brazilmail.com.br (sfcxx@brazilmail.com.br) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) OHIO MAN EARNS $2,708.43 HIS FIRST WEEK! HOME BASED! jvtwh Message-ID: <200111090204.fA924Kg19213@mail> Is working for the "boss" to demeaning and unrewarding? Are you sick of depending on a job with too little pay and too many hours with no personal reward and even less future? If you are determined to retire in the next 2 - 5 years with enough income to have REAL Financial Independence and Freedom, and are not afraid to work for it, I can help you. I am looking for people with a Good Work Ethic and extraordinary Desire to Earn at Least $10,000 per Month Working From Home! This LEGTITMATE HOME-BASED INCOME OPPORTUNITY can put you back in Control of your Time, Your Finances, and your life! If you have tried other opportunities in the past that have failed to live up to their promises, THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN ANYTHING ELSE YOU'VE SEEN! THIS IS NOT A GET-RICH-QUICK SCHEME! YOUR FINANCIAL PAST DOES NOT HAVE TO BE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE! CALL ONLY IF YOU ARE SERIOUS! 1-800-966-3547 ext. 8790 (Free, 24 hours, 2 minute recorded message) DON'T GO TO SLEEP WITHOUT LISTENING TO THIS! "All our dreams can come true - if we have the courage to pursue them" - Walt Disney To be taken out of our database click "reply" and click "send". ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From andosan at cbn.net.id Fri Nov 9 02:46:35 2001 From: andosan at cbn.net.id (Andosan H. Manurung) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <012901c168fb$2d6d43a0$0401a8c0@andosan> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ez.rodriguez at codetel.net.do Fri Nov 9 09:48:00 2001 From: ez.rodriguez at codetel.net.do (Ezequiel Rodriguez) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] OSPF Routing Message-ID: <001a01c16935$e94bd9d0$a44a03c4@cmf5j> Hi, I'm trying to configure OSPF on a MAX TNT and i set up all the possible parameters that i found (I guess), but i can't get anything Could somebody tell me what are the axact parameters that i have to set, so i can communicate via OSPF with a Cisco Routers, and what thing i have to unset, because rigth now i'm using static route. I will appreciate your help Best Regards, Ezequiel Rodriguez E. - CCNA - CODETEL, Verizon Co. Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep. Work Ph. : (809) 220-7784 Cel. Phone : (809) 763-5873 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011109/b795c2bf/attachment.htm From maillist1 at argontech.net Fri Nov 9 08:53:32 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Fans References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011109101014.02a0a478@mail.webfront.net.au> Message-ID: <003601c1692e$4d3add40$3301fe8a@mcc3> found this in my archives from a month ago: Here is where I get mine from. Future Inc 800 757 9923 Nidec Part M33407-16 $9.90 each (this is the big fan) CKJ Components 609 660 2580 Sunon Part KDE2406PHB2 $14.50 (the small fans - same specs as the elina one) Paul At 07:13 AM 10/18/2001, Marc Newman wrote: >Anyone have a source for the fans in a Max 4000? Ascend wanted something >like $1800 last time I called them for a power supply. I have a fan that >is starting to sing. > >Marc >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael J Crick" To: Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:11 PM Subject: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 Fans > > Could anyone tell me were i can purchase 24 volt exhaust fans for a MAX > 4000 in Australia > > Michael > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From newinternetdom at mail.com Sat Nov 10 06:55:28 2001 From: newinternetdom at mail.com (NewDomainRegistry.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 00:00:01 EST Status: LIVE Message-ID: <200111101255.EAA29635@max.bungi.com> Status Alert: .BIZ is NOW LIVE The new .BIZ domain extension was officially launched today, and new registrations are already on a record-setting pace. Several sites have just made .BIZ available to the general public which means that ordinary internet users can register this exciting new domain without the cumbersome paperwork. One such popular site is: www.NewDomainRegistry.net Brief History Back in November, 2000, ICANN, the regulatory agency which oversees the Internet's Domain Name System, approved seven new domain extensions to meet growing demand from the consumer and business sectors. Since the new extensions were first announced last year, experts have widely expected .BIZ to become the most popular of the new extensions and to eventually supercede .COM. The .BIZ registry will be managed by upstart NeuLevel, in direct competition with the former monopoly of Network Solutions. .BIZ represents the first new generic domain name to be introduced since .COM was first launched in 1984. In the ten year span between 1984 and 1994, less than one million .COM domains were registered in total. Today, the registration total for .BIZ will have already exceeded one million. How times have changed... The Benefits: .BIZ aims to be the quintessential domain choice for all businesses on the Internet. Short for .BUSINESS, the .BIZ domain directly addresses the growing need for new generic domain names to eventually replace .COM as the Internet most widely used domain name. The benefits to go .BIZ are clear: * abundant availability of easy to remember and practical domain names * technically recognized across the Internet's DNS * short and catchy extension * affordable registration fees and simplified registration procedures "Establishing a .biz domain name also will help companies cut through the .com clutter. More than 28 million .com names have already been registered. Since the .com domain covers so many sites serving so many different purposes, it's impossible to know whether a particular .com address represents a bona-fide business. In contrast, .biz means business, period." Chicago Tribune, August 22, 2001 To register a new .BIZ extension, you will simply need to check the availability of your domain name at: www.NewDomainRegistry.net and then register it using the easy 3 step process which takes less than 5 minutes. *************************************************************************** This firm opposes the continued sending of unsolicited email and does not intend to send email to anyone who does not wish to receive their special mailings. As a result, they have retained the services of Auto Email Removal, an independent 3rd party, to administer their list management and removal services (http://www.autoemailremoval.com/cgi-local/remove.pl?email=ascend-users@max.bungi.com). This is not unsolicited email. If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please click this link and your removal request will be honored. The removal administrator can then preclude your email address from future mailings. http://www.autoemailremoval.com/cgi-local/remove.pl?email=ascend-users@max.bungi.com Auto Email Removal Company. Ref# 011105 *************************************************************************** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From yawben62 at hotmail.com Sat Nov 10 20:41:39 2001 From: yawben62 at hotmail.com (Heart Health ) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Be True to Your heart Message-ID: <200111110236.SAA01277@max.bungi.com> High cholesterol may not be the sole cause of heart disease! Yes, mounting evidence points to another insidious rogue that can savage your arteries. Take the time to investigate other possibilities that modern medicine is just now embracing. A special 3-page report will explain what it is, what it does to you and even how you can eradicate it with a few simple inexpensive measures! Send a check for $4.95 to Heart Health, 931 S. Delaware, Springfield, Mo., 65802. Be sure to write your email address on the check's memo line. (If you don't include an email address, then the report cannot be sent to you.) Your report will be emailed to you in text format. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From psc5 at powersupply.net Fri Nov 9 08:39:41 2001 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (PowerNet) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K PASSWORDS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200111090939410840.004EC5C1@mail.powersupply.net> I have a buddy that just got a max 4K off ebay and has no way of getting the passwords. He called me since he knows I am on this list. I have not had this problem yet, but would like to know just in case. How do you blast the config back to factory settings on a max 4K and 6K? Thanks, John Have you seen our New Localized Portal? http://www.powersupply.net You can find information on Local Businesses. Just click switch cities and type in your zip code. Get Local! News, Weather, Stocks, Free Classifieds, Local Movie/TV Guide, Domain Registration, Yellow Pages, Online Training, E-Cards and much more! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nightowl at who.net Sat Nov 10 18:22:11 2001 From: nightowl at who.net (Night Owl) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) where your smile ? Message-ID: Online Drugstore can have your order of discounted Viagra shipped to you for only 5 minutes of your time!!! http://justgottago.com/meds/?aid=213840 No Prior Prescriptions Needed -Licensed U.S. Physicians are ready to fill your order -Guaranteed Lowest Prices Available -Discreet Mailing directly to your home or office Just visit http://justgottago.com/meds/?aid=213840 and enjoy the good life today!!! ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mansoormax at yahoo.com Tue Nov 13 05:59:48 2001 From: mansoormax at yahoo.com (Khan Jee) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit Message-ID: <20011113115948.53882.qmail@web20410.mail.yahoo.com> Dear All, During assigning two gateways of different networks, i tried Vrouter concept. But When writing new profile of Vrouter it gives following errors. admin> new VROUTER test admin> write "error: Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From bsall at hotmail.com Tue Nov 13 09:57:48 2001 From: bsall at hotmail.com (Bruce Sall) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Movies Message-ID: <200111131550.fADFocd07312@orngca-mls01.socal.rr.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 6445 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011113/3ec9402c/attachment.jpe From troy at psknet.com Tue Nov 13 09:44:09 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:21 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K PASSWORDS In-Reply-To: <200111090939410840.004EC5C1@mail.powersupply.net> Message-ID: Search google for nindy. http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy G'luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of PowerNet ** Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:40 AM ** To: ascend-users@bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K PASSWORDS ** ** ** I have a buddy that just got a max 4K off ebay and has no way of ** getting the passwords. ** ** He called me since he knows I am on this list. I have not had ** this problem yet, but would like to know just in case. ** ** How do you blast the config back to factory settings on a max 4K and 6K? ** ** Thanks, ** John ** ** Have you seen our New Localized Portal? http://www.powersupply.net ** You can find information on Local Businesses. Just click switch ** cities and type in your zip code. ** Get Local! News, Weather, Stocks, Free Classifieds, Local ** Movie/TV Guide, Domain Registration, ** Yellow Pages, Online Training, E-Cards and much more! ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rdighe at lucent.com Tue Nov 13 17:41:16 2001 From: rdighe at lucent.com (Ravi Dighe) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX 3000 Disconnecting ISDN calls Message-ID: <000b01c16c9c$bcfbc880$466cff87@DIGHER> Hi All, I have 2 MAX 3000's that I have recently upgraded to TAOS 9.04. I have then enabled stacking on these units. The 3000's are using three ISDN30's which have been configured for Cyclical dialling. The remote users are analogue diallers, pipeline isdn routers, and Cisco 803's. Ever since I enable stacking, the MAX is dropping the ISDN calls every 15 minutes or so. I am using extended PINGS to keep the calls up. BTW, when one MAX was running on it's own, it was working perfectly fine. What are the first steps that I can do to resolve this? I have already checked the remote units and they look fine. I had also temporarily disabled the stack and the calls came through normally and stayed up. Anybody out there have a clue? Cheers, Rav Ravi Dighe, CCNP Member of Consulting Staff Lucent ESS M: +44 (0) 776 967 0813 Improvise! Adapt! Overcome! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011113/a83bbbdf/attachment.html From hartala80 at hotmail.com Wed Nov 14 02:41:21 2001 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: Dear All i want to know what is the disconnect / progress code for the MAX TNT in case of the call failed during the negotiation process . thx in advance _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Wed Nov 14 07:56:41 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE:(ASCEND) Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit Message-ID: can you do admin>get base and send the result Ahmad EL-Hakim From gordo at lucent.com Wed Nov 14 13:29:15 2001 From: gordo at lucent.com (Gordon Mackenzie) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit References: <200111140645.WAA17246@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3BF2C60B.6080700@lucent.com> Your device, whatever it is, is not licensed for VROUTER capability. You should check with your Lucent Product Sales Rep as to whether you should have it enabled as part of your original purchase or options on obtaining the license upgrade for the feature. If you have a TNT/APX8K/APX1K do a "get base" command at the CLI to find out was is/is not enabled. If you have a MAX product, use the TAB key to go to the screen that shows the serial number and then scroll down that sub-window with the down arrow key to see what's enabled/disabled. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Khan Jee > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 03:59:48 -0800 (PST) > Subject: (ASCEND) Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit > > Dear All, > During assigning two gateways of different networks, i > tried Vrouter concept. But When writing new profile of > Vrouter it gives following errors. > > admin> new VROUTER test > admin> write > > "error: Virtual Router is not licensed for this unit." > -- -- Gordon Mackenzie (510) 747-2790 Software Quality Assurance < Alameda < Access Engineering < INS < Lucent mailto:gordo@lucent.com http://www.lucent.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cwiley at nfis.com Wed Nov 14 20:22:00 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (C. Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet Message-ID: Hi. I've got a strange problem that has cropped up over the last few weeks. Every once in a while I'll have a Max 6000 with software load 7.0.4 lose its ethernet connectivity. The PRI's are still functioning and the modems answer incoming calls. I at first thought I had a chasis going bad so I swapped it out, but now the replacemnet is doing the same thing. I'm at wits end and thought those on this list might have ideas and/or things I could look at to try and find the source of the problem. Thanks, Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Nov 15 07:05:49 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I've had this before as well. In the end, the solution was to get rid of the cheap switch I had, and install a Cisco 2900, which works great for everything but my iMac. Some things to try include replacing the ethernet cable, try a different port on your switch, try a different switch. Also, have you tried the dongle that comes with the 6k? I've never needed it, but it may solve your problems. IIRC, the dongle reverses pins 3 & 6, so making a custom cable can yeild the same results. Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of C. Wiley ** Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:22 PM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet ** ** ** Hi. ** ** I've got a strange problem that has cropped up over the last few weeks. ** Every once in a while I'll have a Max 6000 with software load 7.0.4 lose ** its ethernet connectivity. The PRI's are still functioning and ** the modems ** answer incoming calls. I at first thought I had a chasis going bad so I ** swapped it out, but now the replacemnet is doing the same thing. ** ** I'm at wits end and thought those on this list might have ideas and/or ** things I could look at to try and find the source of the problem. ** ** Thanks, ** ** Clint ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rocca at multiboard.com Thu Nov 15 08:49:16 2001 From: rocca at multiboard.com (Peter Rocca) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: ascend-users-digest V96 #2421 In-Reply-To: <200111150645.WAA22396@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: > I've got a strange problem that has cropped up over the last few weeks. > Every once in a while I'll have a Max 6000 with software load 7.0.4 lose > its ethernet connectivity. The PRI's are still functioning and the modems > answer incoming calls. I at first thought I had a chasis going bad so I > swapped it out, but now the replacemnet is doing the same thing. > I'm at wits end and thought those on this list might have ideas and/or > things I could look at to try and find the source of the problem. Not sure if it's been overlooked, but if you swapped the unit out and it failed too and this just recently started happening then it sounds to me that either your hub/switch port is dying, or less likely, but possible, that your cable is flaky. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MPuras at solunet.com Thu Nov 15 09:47:40 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFC67@trinidad.solunet.com> Clint, I have seen this as well and basically what Troy stated is what you should do. I have had to use the dongle before with similar problem you are having and the dongle corrected the issues. In addition, on 5 separate cases I have had to replace the switch. Hopefully this helps. Thanks, Mario Puras JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP SoluNet Technical Support Customer Support Engineer -----Original Message----- From: C. Wiley [mailto:cwiley@nfis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:22 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet Hi. I've got a strange problem that has cropped up over the last few weeks. Every once in a while I'll have a Max 6000 with software load 7.0.4 lose its ethernet connectivity. The PRI's are still functioning and the modems answer incoming calls. I at first thought I had a chasis going bad so I swapped it out, but now the replacemnet is doing the same thing. I'm at wits end and thought those on this list might have ideas and/or things I could look at to try and find the source of the problem. Thanks, Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cwiley at nfis.com Thu Nov 15 09:32:09 2001 From: cwiley at nfis.com (C. Wiley) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFC67@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 MPuras@solunet.com wrote: > Clint, > > > I have seen this as well and basically what Troy stated is what you > should do. I have had to use the dongle before with similar problem you are > having and the dongle corrected the issues. In addition, on 5 separate > cases I have had to replace the switch. Hopefully this helps. > > OK. The replacement is on the same switch, but different port and cable. SO, a different switch is the most likely solution? Clint ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From a-t at altavista.com Thu Nov 15 12:14:10 2001 From: a-t at altavista.com (A T) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] DBA troubleshooting Message-ID: <20011115181410.23967.cpmta@c012.sfo.cp.net> Does anyone know of a document that can help with troubleshooting DBA? I have an old Pipeline 75 with pretty old software (5.1a9 or something like that -- I don't have it here in front of me). I can get a single or two-channel call to my ISP by adjusting the 'base ch count' parameter, but the dynamic part is eluding me. I have tried MPP, and I have tried BACP. I have no idea what my ISP is using on their end, which I realize would make this a lot easier... but I do know that my 3com access builder 500 worked fine to add the second B-channel based on usage. I'm looking for info like... 'how do I tell if my connection is really MP+, or if MP+ was not available and MP is being used?' and 'how do I tell if the pipeline tried to bring up the second channel but couldn't authenticate it', or 'known problems with various releases of pipeline firmware' and things like that. Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! http://www.shopping.altavista.com From rydrcom at yahoo.com Thu Nov 15 13:27:21 2001 From: rydrcom at yahoo.com (Ryder Communications) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT P/S Question Message-ID: <20011115192721.10462.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> Hello everyone, Hopefully one of you can answer this question: Can -H power supplies be used in non -H chassis? Example: TNT-2AC w/2 TNT-SP-AC-H And can you install DC power supplies into AC chassis or vise/versa? Example: TNT-2AC w/2 TNT-SP-DC TNT-2DC w/2 TNT-SP-AC TNT-2AC w/2 TNT-SP-DC-H TNT-2DC w/2 TNT-SP-AC-H Please help if you can. Thanks, Brian Braisted RYDER Communications, Inc. Wide Area Networking Solutions 35B Wilson Drive Sparta, NJ 07871-3427 Tel. 973-940-7350 / 1-877-RYDRCOM x227 FAX. 973-940-7355 / 1-877-RYDRFAX brian@rydrcom.com www.rydrcom.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nsten at o1.com Thu Nov 15 16:31:34 2001 From: nsten at o1.com (Nicholas Sten) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Lucent ASG - ICD for Softswitch Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20011115142638.01e9c590@63.169.132.241> All, Consider this a generic invite to our list for anyone with a Lucent ASG / ICD for Softswitch. Please reply to me off list and I will supply you with the invite instructions. As most of you with this product may already know, there is a scarcity of information publicly available regarding this product in production and we will all benefit with the sharing of ideas and experiences as well as current updates and issues. Thanks for your time, Nicholas Sten O1 Communications nsten@o1.com From jonas.back at pi.se Thu Nov 15 16:25:30 2001 From: jonas.back at pi.se (Jonas Back) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packets In-Reply-To: <20011115192721.10462.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <003701c16e24$6f963ec0$a14507c3@adm.pi.se> Hi, I'm having problems with our DSLMAX20. It drops packets on the Ethernet and the switch it's connected to shows alignment errors. We also have Linux machine connected to the network on the ethernet side and the Linux machine report CRC errors on packets recieved from the DSLMAX. Anyone noticed this or have any ideas on how to fix it?! It seems like the box sends out bad packets because we have tried almost anything to eliminate the half/full duplex problem.. Btw, we have two DSLMAX20 and both of them have the same problem. Regards, Jonas Back Cable & Wireless - Sweden http://www.cw.com/se ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MPuras at solunet.com Thu Nov 15 17:30:51 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packets Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFC79@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Jonas, I would start of by looking at your cabling and port on the switch (I hope you have a switch and not a hub). Alignment Errors contain partial octets and fail the FCS check. So this means that you should also be receiving CRC errors or FCS errors. Both Alignment Errors and FCS Errors can be caused by equipment powering up/down or by noise on unshielded twisted-pair (10BASE-T) segments. If you have a high percentage of CRC Errors with regards to transmits, it could indicate a poor quality cable. If you have a high amount of Alignment Errors it more than likely is a speed mismatch. Check the speed of the port on the switch and all devices connected to that segment. Hope this helps! Thanks, Mario Puras JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP SoluNet Technical Support Customer Support Engineer We don't make network products, we make them Work! * Mailto:mpuras@solunet.com * 888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) -----Original Message----- From: Jonas Back [mailto:jonas.back@pi.se] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:26 PM To: 'ascend' Subject: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packets Hi, I'm having problems with our DSLMAX20. It drops packets on the Ethernet and the switch it's connected to shows alignment errors. We also have Linux machine connected to the network on the ethernet side and the Linux machine report CRC errors on packets recieved from the DSLMAX. Anyone noticed this or have any ideas on how to fix it?! It seems like the box sends out bad packets because we have tried almost anything to eliminate the half/full duplex problem.. Btw, we have two DSLMAX20 and both of them have the same problem. Regards, Jonas Back Cable & Wireless - Sweden http://www.cw.com/se ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From anssi.sallinen at jippiigroup.com Fri Nov 16 01:57:45 2001 From: anssi.sallinen at jippiigroup.com (Anssi Sallinen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet References: Message-ID: <3BF4C6F9.6A365385@jippiigroup.com> > I've had this before as well. In the end, the solution was to get rid of > the cheap switch I had, and install a Cisco 2900, which works great for > everything but my iMac. > > Some things to try include replacing the ethernet cable, try a different > port on your switch, try a different switch. > > Also, have you tried the dongle that comes with the 6k? I've never needed > it, but it may solve your problems. IIRC, the dongle reverses pins 3 & 6, > so making a custom cable can yeild the same results. I've mailed a couple of times to this list concerning a problem like this but with the MAX20's. We are running 8.0.5 and this seems to bother boxes that have a lot of DSL's connected with heavy traffic. In my opinion this has nothing to do with switches as we have been running the MAX'es against Cisco Catalysts since day one. -- Anssi Sallinen -|- E-Mail: anssi.sallinen@jippiigroup.com Network Engineer -|- Engineering site http://www.jippii.net Jippii Group Oyj -|- Corporate site http://www.jippiigroup.com Phone: +358-9-42430001 -|- Fax : +358-9-42430661 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From shannon at starnetusa.net Fri Nov 16 10:32:05 2001 From: shannon at starnetusa.net (Shannon Price) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: (ASCEND) [Ascend] Filtering UDP ports In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFC79@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: Trying to block all UDP (ports 137,138 and 139) traffic via a filter on the Ethernet. Missing something because it's not working. Has anyone done this or had any luck doing something similar? Thanks, Shannon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Fri Nov 16 11:22:32 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (Mick Dobra) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:22 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packet In-Reply-To: <003701c16e24$6f963ec0$a14507c3@adm.pi.se> Message-ID: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Jonas Back wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having problems with our DSLMAX20. It drops packets on the Ethernet and > the switch it's connected to shows alignment errors. We also have Linux > machine connected to the network on the ethernet side and the Linux machine > report CRC errors on packets recieved from the DSLMAX. Anyone noticed this > or have any ideas on how to fix it?! > It seems like the box sends out bad packets because we have tried almost > anything to eliminate the half/full duplex problem.. > > Btw, we have two DSLMAX20 and both of them have the same problem. > What kind of switch? Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ahakim at link.net Fri Nov 16 15:21:32 2001 From: ahakim at link.net (Ahmad EL-Hakim) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE:(ASCEND) TNT P/S Question Message-ID: As far as I know the TNT Chassis for both AC and DC versions are identical, so you have the flexibility to replace the AC power supply to DC power supply (No Problem), and you can even run the TNT using one AC and one DC power supplies in the same chassis simultaneously. Please double check with Lucent Sales Rep. Ahmad EL-Hakim From chris at areti.co.uk Sat Nov 17 12:26:32 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP Message-ID: <20011117182632.A31051@areti.co.uk> I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 which I use on our SoHo network, it works fine in general but I have one difficulty with it, how to set up DNS when I use different ISPs. Is there a 'clever' way to do this or do I really need to go round all the computers on the network and change their DNS settings when I connect to a different ISP? I use two or three because their performance varies and I slet the one that works best at the time. I know I can stay using the same DNS whichever ISP I connect to but this isn't ideal from the performance point of view and there's no guarantee that ISPs will continue to be happy with one using their DNS when not connectied vie them. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Sat Nov 17 15:07:54 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max loses ethernet In-Reply-To: <200111170645.WAA03165@max.bungi.com> References: <200111170645.WAA03165@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Anssi Sallinen > >> I've had this before as well. In the end, the solution was to get rid of >> the cheap switch I had, and install a Cisco 2900, which works great for >> everything but my iMac. >> >> Some things to try include replacing the ethernet cable, try a different >> port on your switch, try a different switch. >> >> Also, have you tried the dongle that comes with the 6k? I've never needed >> it, but it may solve your problems. IIRC, the dongle reverses pins 3 & 6, >> so making a custom cable can yeild the same results. > >I've mailed a couple of times to this list concerning a problem like this >but with the MAX20's. We are running 8.0.5 and this seems to bother boxes >that have a lot of DSL's connected with heavy traffic. In my opinion this >has nothing to do with switches as we have been running the MAX'es against >Cisco Catalysts since day one. The Ethernet problems we've seen with Max 20s all relate to filters--even filters applied to interfaces other than the affected Ethernet interface! If you have any filters applied anywhere on that Max 20, try removing them as a test. The release notes for 8.0.5 (in either the DSL Terminator 100 or DSL Max 20 docs, but not both) allude to this bug. -- Peter Lalor ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From plalor at infoasis.com Sat Nov 17 15:14:39 2001 From: plalor at infoasis.com (Peter Lalor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Filtering UDP ports In-Reply-To: <200111170645.WAA03165@max.bungi.com> References: <200111170645.WAA03165@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: >From: Shannon Price > >Trying to block all UDP (ports 137,138 and 139) traffic via a filter on the >Ethernet. Missing something because it's not working. Has anyone done this >or had any luck doing something similar? Read up on NetBIOS. Some ports are UDP and others are TCP. Some are source-port and others are dest-port. Searching the archives on 'netbios filter' should give you everything you need. -- Peter Lalor ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jonas.back at pi.se Mon Nov 19 02:49:42 2001 From: jonas.back at pi.se (Jonas Back) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <00bc01c170d7$21e1f2e0$a14507c3@adm.pi.se> It's a Cisco 2924XL switch. It seems like the problem started when we upgraded to release 8.0.5. Regards, Jonas Back Cable & Wireless - Sweden http://www.cw.com/se > -----Original Message----- > From: Mick Dobra [mailto:mdobra@mtco.com] > Sent: den 16 november 2001 18:23 > To: Jonas Back > Cc: 'ascend' > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packet > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Jonas Back wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm having problems with our DSLMAX20. It drops packets on > the Ethernet and > > the switch it's connected to shows alignment errors. We > also have Linux > > machine connected to the network on the ethernet side and > the Linux machine > > report CRC errors on packets recieved from the DSLMAX. > Anyone noticed this > > or have any ideas on how to fix it?! > > It seems like the box sends out bad packets because we have > tried almost > > anything to eliminate the half/full duplex problem.. > > > > Btw, we have two DSLMAX20 and both of them have the same problem. > > > > What kind of switch? > > Mick Dobra > Systems Administrator > MTCO Communications > 1-800-859-6826 > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From everett at pgweb.com Tue Nov 20 18:34:47 2001 From: everett at pgweb.com (shawn everett) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 Message-ID: Is it possible to make an E1 Max work on a T1 line by changing it's softwre? Is it possible to make them work at all on a T1 line?? Shawn ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mdobra at mtco.com Tue Nov 20 14:01:19 2001 From: mdobra at mtco.com (Mick Dobra) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packet In-Reply-To: <00bc01c170d7$21e1f2e0$a14507c3@adm.pi.se> Message-ID: Well, We have had some rather strange problems with the Max20's. But in most cases they have fixed themselves before we could figure out the problem. If you have an extra (non-cisco) switch laying around give it a try. We found problems with certain nic's and switches. maybe it's an issue like that. On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Jonas Back wrote: > It's a Cisco 2924XL switch. > > It seems like the problem started when we upgraded to release 8.0.5. > > Regards, > Jonas Back > Cable & Wireless - Sweden > http://www.cw.com/se > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mick Dobra [mailto:mdobra@mtco.com] > > Sent: den 16 november 2001 18:23 > > To: Jonas Back > > Cc: 'ascend' > > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) DSLMAX20 and bad ethernet packet > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Jonas Back wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm having problems with our DSLMAX20. It drops packets on > > the Ethernet and > > > the switch it's connected to shows alignment errors. We > > also have Linux > > > machine connected to the network on the ethernet side and > > the Linux machine > > > report CRC errors on packets recieved from the DSLMAX. > > Anyone noticed this > > > or have any ideas on how to fix it?! > > > It seems like the box sends out bad packets because we have > > tried almost > > > anything to eliminate the half/full duplex problem.. > > > > > > Btw, we have two DSLMAX20 and both of them have the same problem. > > > > > > > What kind of switch? > > > > Mick Dobra > > Systems Administrator > > MTCO Communications > > 1-800-859-6826 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-859-6826, techie@mtco.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From kay.beswick at uk.easynet.net Tue Nov 20 23:50:32 2001 From: kay.beswick at uk.easynet.net (Kay Beswick) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disconnect Code 36 Message-ID: <7052044C7D7AD511A20200508B5A9C58138637@MAGRAT> Hi Does anyone know what the diconnect code 36 means ?. Cheers Kay Beswick Network Engineer Systems Easynet Limited http://www.easynet.net 44-46 Whitfield Street London W1P 5RF T: 0845 333 4400 F: 020 7900 4445 + Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Tue Nov 20 15:23:18 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Filtering UDP ports Message-ID: <3BFAC9C6.F68E3AC9@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> >From: Shannon Price > >Trying to block all UDP (ports 137,138 and 139) traffic via a filter on the >Ethernet. Missing something because it's not working. Has anyone done this >or had any luck doing something similar? Hi Shannon, if you write a filter, use the type "IP filter" with protocol=17 (UDP) for source and dest port=137 protocol=17 (UDP) for source and dest port=138 protocol=6 (TCP) for source and dest port=139 But be warned that this will not stop all traffic from Win machines. Further candidates for filtering may be port 135 for RPC and port 53 for WINS over DNS. Especially during the boot phase I still observe dialouts even with the common 137-139 filters. But then again, who cares? Best regards, Wolfgang _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Wed Nov 21 04:09:16 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Filtering UDP ports Message-ID: <3BFB7D4C.357B6AC8@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Hi Shannon, if you write a filter, use the type "IP filter" with protocol=17 (UDP) for source and dest port=137 protocol=17 (UDP) for source and dest port=138 protocol=6 (TCP) for source and dest port=139 But be warned that this will not stop all traffic from Win machines. Further candidates for filtering may be port 135 for RPC and port 53 for WINS over DNS. Especially during the boot phase I still observe dialouts even with the common 137-139 filters. But then again, who cares? Best regards, Wolfgang >From: Shannon Price > >Trying to block all UDP (ports 137,138 and 139) traffic via a filter on the >Ethernet. Missing something because it's not working. Has anyone done this >or had any luck doing something similar? _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From James at superbug.demon.co.uk Wed Nov 21 08:18:19 2001 From: James at superbug.demon.co.uk (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect Code 36 In-Reply-To: <7052044C7D7AD511A20200508B5A9C58138637@MAGRAT> Message-ID: Available from http://www.lucent.com web site. Customer Support->General Access(No password needed)->Product Index(Documentation) ->Data Networking Solutions (APX8000) ->Technical Notes->Call Disconnect and Progress Code List. Is that what you needed ? Cheers James > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Kay Beswick > Sent: 21 November 2001 05:51 > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect Code 36 > > > Hi > > > Does anyone know what the diconnect code 36 means ?. > > > Cheers > > Kay Beswick > Network Engineer > Systems > > Easynet Limited http://www.easynet.net > > 44-46 Whitfield Street > London W1P 5RF > T: 0845 333 4400 > F: 020 7900 4445 > > + Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rsrubens at terra.com.br Wed Nov 21 08:50:34 2001 From: rsrubens at terra.com.br (Rubens R. Silva) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Squid Cache x MAX6000 Message-ID: Hello Folks, We have a MAX6000, that is our RAS and also main router, exist any way to use a Transparent Squid Cache Server to be used for our dial in clients? See the following scheme: +-- PSTN | | Internet --- [Max6000] --- Ethernet The idea is: +-- PSTN | | Internet --- [Max6000] --- Ethernet | + - Proxy (Squid) Thanks a lot. Rubens ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Nov 21 09:17:17 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF00E2EF1@trinidad.solunet.com> No, it is not possible. There are hardware differences between the E1 and T1 that cannot be changed. Same goes for the 3000's, 6000's as well. David Pascarella, CCNA MCSE LSCP A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: shawn everett [mailto:everett@pgweb.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:35 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 Is it possible to make an E1 Max work on a T1 line by changing it's softwre? Is it possible to make them work at all on a T1 line?? Shawn ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lennard at ns1.carib-link.net Wed Nov 21 10:11:37 2001 From: lennard at ns1.carib-link.net (Lennard Kong) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max with ISDN to use with Channelized T1 Message-ID: Hello, I have a Max with ISDN/Frame options, Can this max still be used with Channelized T1 for regular dialup as a terminal server ? If not, what can be done ? Thanks, Lennard Kong ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lennard at ns1.carib-link.net Wed Nov 21 10:08:38 2001 From: lennard at ns1.carib-link.net (Lennard Kong) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:23 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4002 with ISDN option to use with Channelized T1 Message-ID: Hello, I have a Max which has the ISDN Frame Relay options installed, will this Max still work as a regular dialup terminal server on channelized T1 ? If not what can I do ? Thanks, Lennard Kong ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Nov 21 11:03:41 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max with ISDN to use with Channelized T1 Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF00E2EF3@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Lennard, A Max that has ISDN Signaling enabled can still terminate T1 calls for PPP dial in users. You just have an option, it is not a requirement. If the MAX was previously running PRI's and you are going to switch to T1's, make sure that you map each DS0 (channel) on the T1 to a modem slot in addition to the other config changes you make on the lines. David Pascarella, CCNA MCSE LSCP A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Lennard Kong [mailto:lennard@ns1.carib-link.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:12 AM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Max with ISDN to use with Channelized T1 Hello, I have a Max with ISDN/Frame options, Can this max still be used with Channelized T1 for regular dialup as a terminal server ? If not, what can be done ? Thanks, Lennard Kong ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From equipment at cubexs.net.pk Wed Nov 21 11:23:29 2001 From: equipment at cubexs.net.pk (Aly Ramzan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF00E2EF1@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: <000301c172b1$3d8fd9e0$57c23fca@home> Get in touch with Anton at Sphyrna Inc [isp@sphyrna.com], he does T1 to E1 chassis conversions. Regards, Aly Ramzan CubeXS -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of DPascarella@solunet.com Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:17 PM To: everett@pgweb.com; ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 No, it is not possible. There are hardware differences between the E1 and T1 that cannot be changed. Same goes for the 3000's, 6000's as well. David Pascarella, CCNA MCSE LSCP A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: shawn everett [mailto:everett@pgweb.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:35 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4000 E1 Is it possible to make an E1 Max work on a T1 line by changing it's softwre? Is it possible to make them work at all on a T1 line?? Shawn ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl Thu Nov 22 04:00:05 2001 From: j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl (Jeroen Veen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT Message-ID: Greetings, Does anyone here have any experience in/on (?) using these (Radius reply) messages to send specific messages to a user? As in "You cannot log in because you didn't pay your bill" and such. Thanks, Jeroen Veen Planet Media Group ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From James at superbug.demon.co.uk Thu Nov 22 06:35:19 2001 From: James at superbug.demon.co.uk (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: The message will only get displayed in the "Terminal windows after dial" screen. If the user is doing just PPP, the message will never be seen by the user. An approach some people take, is to put a filter on the user if they have not paid their bill, so that no matter which web site they try to get to, it will display the same "Pay bill please" web page. Cheers James > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeroen Veen > Sent: 22 November 2001 10:00 > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > Subject: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT > > > Greetings, > > Does anyone here have any experience in/on (?) using these (Radius reply) > messages to send specific messages to a user? As in "You cannot log in > because you didn't pay your bill" and such. > > Thanks, > > Jeroen Veen > Planet Media Group > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From raymond.brighenti at trademark-design.com Thu Nov 22 08:12:53 2001 From: raymond.brighenti at trademark-design.com (Raymond Brighenti) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Problems with Cellpipe and MRTG Message-ID: Hi people, Currently have a Lucent DSL-Cell-50H (Rev 9.1-142.0 l.h50), and tried to use cfgmaker on the box so I can monitor bandwidth in/out. The box does respond but informs me that all interface "it is operationally DOWN" or "has a speed of 0 which makes no sense" which is obviously wrong cause the box is up and running fine. Anyone know anything about these boxes that cause this? Ta Ray ### Interface 1 >> Descr: 'Console 2' | Name: '' | Ip: '' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has a speed of 0 which makes no sense # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_1]: 1:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_1]: MRTG_INT_IP="" MRTG_INT_DESCR="Console 2" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_1]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_1]: Traffic Analysis for 1 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_1]:

Traffic Analysis for 1 --

# # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:Console 2
ifType: rs232 (33)
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
### Interface 2 >> Descr: 'HDSL2 Slot 1 Line 1' | Name: '' | Ip: '' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * it is operationally DOWN ### * has a speed of 0 which makes no sense # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_2]: 2:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_2]: MRTG_INT_IP="" MRTG_INT_DESCR="HDSL2 Slot 1 Line 1" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_2]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_2]: Traffic Analysis for 2 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_2]:

Traffic Analysis for 2 --

# # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:HDSL2 Slot 1 Line 1
ifType: (168)
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
### Interface 3 >> Descr: '' | Name: '' | Ip: 'IP.of.Pipeline' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has a speed of which makes no sense ### * got 'Received SNMP response with error code ### error status: noSuchName ### index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.3) ### SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "IP.of.Pipeline" [IP.of.Pipeline].161) ### community: "PassworD" ### request ID: 1297677502 ### PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes ### timeout: 2s ### retries: 5 ### backoff: 1)' from interface when trying to query # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_3]: 3:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_3]: MRTG_INT_IP="IP.of.Pipeline" MRTG_INT_DESCR="" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_3]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_3]: Traffic Analysis for 3 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_3]:

Traffic Analysis for 3 --

# # # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:
ifType: ()
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
Ip: IP.of.Pipeline ()
### Interface 16 >> Descr: '' | Name: '' | Ip: '127.0.0.2' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has a speed of which makes no sense ### * got 'Received SNMP response with error code ### error status: noSuchName ### index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.16) ### SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "IP.of.Pipeline" [IP.of.Pipeline].161) ### community: "PassworD" ### request ID: 1297677503 ### PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes ### timeout: 2s ### retries: 5 ### backoff: 1)' from interface when trying to query # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_16]: 16:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_16]: MRTG_INT_IP="127.0.0.2" MRTG_INT_DESCR="" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_16]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_16]: Traffic Analysis for 16 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_16]:

Traffic Analysis for 16 --

# # # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:
ifType: ()
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
Ip: 127.0.0.2 ()
### Interface 17 >> Descr: '' | Name: '' | Ip: '127.0.0.3' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has a speed of which makes no sense ### * got 'Received SNMP response with error code ### error status: noSuchName ### index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.17) ### SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "IP.of.Pipeline" [IP.of.Pipeline].161) ### community: "PassworD" ### request ID: 1297677504 ### PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes ### timeout: 2s ### retries: 5 ### backoff: 1)' from interface when trying to query # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_17]: 17:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_17]: MRTG_INT_IP="127.0.0.3" MRTG_INT_DESCR="" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_17]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_17]: Traffic Analysis for 17 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_17]:

Traffic Analysis for 17 --

# # # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:
ifType: ()
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
Ip: 127.0.0.3 ()
### Interface 18 >> Descr: '' | Name: '' | Ip: '127.0.0.1' | Eth: '' ### ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has a speed of which makes no sense ### * got 'Received SNMP response with error code ### error status: noSuchName ### index 1 (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.18) ### SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "IP.of.Pipeline" [IP.of.Pipeline].161) ### community: "PassworD" ### request ID: 1297677505 ### PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes ### timeout: 2s ### retries: 5 ### backoff: 1)' from interface when trying to query # # Target[IP.of.Pipeline_18]: 18:PassworD@IP.of.Pipeline: # SetEnv[IP.of.Pipeline_18]: MRTG_INT_IP="127.0.0.1" MRTG_INT_DESCR="" # MaxBytes[IP.of.Pipeline_18]: 0 # Title[IP.of.Pipeline_18]: Traffic Analysis for 18 -- # PageTop[IP.of.Pipeline_18]:

Traffic Analysis for 18 --

# # # # # # # # #
System: in
Maintainer:
Description:
ifType: ()
ifName:
Max Speed: 0.0 Bytes/s
Ip: 127.0.0.1 (localhost)
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl Thu Nov 22 07:35:54 2001 From: j.veen at planetmediagroup.nl (Jeroen Veen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX T NT Message-ID: That's what we currently do. Using the radius attribute seems like a more elegant option though and that also gives us the option to send back more usefull error messages than "error -235256, connection was not established" and the likes. Looks like we're going to have to ask our software engineers to dive into windows' ppp stack to get that message into some other window then :-). Greetings, Jeroen > -----Original Message----- > From: James Courtier-Dutton [mailto:James@superbug.demon.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 1:35 PM > To: Jeroen Veen; ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply > message) in a MAX > TNT > > > The message will only get displayed in the "Terminal windows > after dial" > screen. > If the user is doing just PPP, the message will never be seen > by the user. > An approach some people take, is to put a filter on the user > if they have > not paid their bill, so that no matter which web site they > try to get to, it > will display the same "Pay bill please" web page. > Cheers > James > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeroen Veen > > Sent: 22 November 2001 10:00 > > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > > Subject: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) > in a MAX TNT > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > Does anyone here have any experience in/on (?) using these > (Radius reply) > > messages to send specific messages to a user? As in "You > cannot log in > > because you didn't pay your bill" and such. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeroen Veen > > Planet Media Group > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Holger.Steppke at team4m.de Sat Nov 24 05:00:04 2001 From: Holger.Steppke at team4m.de (Holger Steppke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP In-Reply-To: <20011117182632.A31051@areti.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi, its a long time ago that i configured a Pipline but as far as i can remember it can act as an DNS as well. So the setup looks like you configure on all your computers the Pipline as the DNS server and let them cache and forward the requests to your ISP. Then you need to change only the DNS entrys on the pipline. Go to Ethernet -> Mod Config -> DNS (on my P50 but should be the same on a P75) i hope i could help Holger >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com >[mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Chris Green >Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 7:27 PM >To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com >Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP > > >I have an Ascend Pipeline 75 which I use on our SoHo network, it works >fine in general but I have one difficulty with it, how to set up DNS >when I use different ISPs. > >Is there a 'clever' way to do this or do I really need to go round all >the computers on the network and change their DNS settings when I >connect to a different ISP? I use two or three because their >performance varies and I slet the one that works best at the time. > >I know I can stay using the same DNS whichever ISP I connect to but >this isn't ideal from the performance point of view and there's no >guarantee that ISPs will continue to be happy with one using their DNS >when not connectied vie them. > >-- >Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) > Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk > WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rjb at worldnetoh.com Sun Nov 25 00:05:15 2001 From: rjb at worldnetoh.com (Robert) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] 7.0x Dialin Configuration Question Message-ID: <08cc01c17577$299875a0$0a01a8c0@worldnetoh.com> I am configuring a Max 2000, TAOS 7.022, provisioned with a standard ICG PRI (just a vanilla ATT type PRI). In testing it with the PRI, the user receives about 1 second of a busy signal, and then the modem picks up. The line doesn't do that with my old equipment (nonascend). Any suggestions on configuration that will fix this? Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011125/68c278d1/attachment.htm From sysop at worldnetoh.com Sun Nov 25 00:06:55 2001 From: sysop at worldnetoh.com (Rob) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Dialin Configuration Problem Message-ID: <08e501c17577$65bc93e0$0a01a8c0@worldnetoh.com> I am configuring a Max 2000, TAOS 7.022, provisioned with a standard ICG PRI (just a vanilla ATT type PRI). In testing it with the PRI, the user receives about 1 second of a busy signal, and then the modem picks up. The line doesn't do that with my old equipment (nonascend). Any suggestions on configuration that will fix this? BTW - anyone have any experience on the performance of a 2000 under load? Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20011125/92eafa45/attachment.html From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Sun Nov 25 08:46:01 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP Message-ID: <3C010429.C9D0C48E@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> > its a long time ago that i configured a Pipline but as far as i can > remember it can act as an DNS as well. This will not work in all cases as expected. The newer pipelines can maintain a local name list of 8 hosts maximum. Name requests which can be served from this list will not be forwarded to the Client DNS. You have to configure the names manually (it is not a DNS cache), the IP addresses can be updated automatically. See yourself at Mod Config -> DNS. Note that this will not be changed according to the provider you use. Actually I can't see any difference between using the static list or always the same external DNS regardless of the connection used. BTW, I haven't had any trouble resolving names on a DNS from a different provider. Only if you use private names (local to the network behind a connection profile) this won't work at all. -- Best regards, Wolfgang _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B ? E ? N ? E ? I ? C ? K ? E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Netzwerk-Design Remote Access und WAN-L?sungen Storage-L?sungen (RAID, libraries, NAS/SAN) COMPAQ Server und PC Windows NT Implementation und Administration Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ians at ballarat.omniconnect.com.au Sun Nov 25 18:04:08 2001 From: ians at ballarat.omniconnect.com.au (ians@ballarat.omniconnect.com.au) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX6000 7.2.4 Reseting Message-ID: <1006733048.3c0186f835ed8@admin.ballarat.omniconnect.com.au> Hi all, I have 4 MAX 6000\'s running Version 7.2.4 2 are perfect no problems but they are not very busy (~60) users each 2 of them are very busy (~500 users each) and reset randomly Would anyone be able to help me work out how to fix this? After the MAX 6000 resets it tries to connect using these names Reject User: pools-Client, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: banner, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: permconn-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: frdlink-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: bridge-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: dovbs-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: dovbs-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: initial-banner-Client, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: initial-banner, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: route-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found Reject User: route-1, Reason = User Not Found As you can see we don\'t have these names in our RADIUS system and I have never told these MAX 6000\'s these names So I don\'t know why they are trying them This goes on for about 1 minute then all is OK till next time ie every 6 to 12 hours Could someone be trying to hijack the MAX\'s via the E1\'s (Telstra ONRAMP\'s)? Please help me Best regards Ian Small OMNIconnect PTY LTD http://omni.net.au ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Sun Nov 25 19:06:55 2001 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX6000 7.2.4 Reseting In-Reply-To: <1006733048.3c0186f835ed8@admin.ballarat.omniconnect.com.au > Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20011126140655.013b4420@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 11:04 AM 26/11/01 +1100, ians@ballarat.omniconnect.com.au wrote: >Hi all, >I have 4 MAX 6000\'s running Version 7.2.4 >2 are perfect no problems but they are not very busy (~60) users each >2 of them are very busy (~500 users each) and reset randomly >Would anyone be able to help me work out how to fix this? > >After the MAX 6000 resets it tries to connect using these names > >Reject User: pools-Client, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: banner, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: permconn-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: frdlink-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: bridge-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: dovbs-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: dovbs-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: initial-banner-Client, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: initial-banner, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: route-Client-1, Reason = User Not Found >Reject User: route-1, Reason = User Not Found > >As you can see we don\'t have these names in our RADIUS system >and I have never told these MAX 6000\'s these names >So I don\'t know why they are trying them This is normal - when the MAX boots up it queries the Radius Server using a whole bunch of usernames like this, to retrieve additional external configuration. If you study the Radius manual for the MAX you'll see reference to it. Basically its harmless. >This goes on for about 1 minute then all is OK till next time >ie every 6 to 12 hours This however, is bad news. Because the MAX only sends these queries when it boots up, it means your box is rebooting itself every 6 to 12 hours. If you go into debug mode (control D then D again) and type: fatal-history If you see a "FATAL ERROR" that means your box crashed, and it will be followed by a "SYSTEM IS UP" which is when it rebooted itself automatically. I get one about every 3 or 4 months, but I havn't been able to isolate the cause. If you're getting it every 6 to 12 hours then I'd say you've got some kind of hardware fault, or maybe you're triggering a bug in your firmware version. (I'm running 7.2.0) Regards, Simon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From chris at areti.co.uk Mon Nov 26 03:43:30 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP In-Reply-To: <3C010429.C9D0C48E@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de>; from Wolfgang.Beneicke@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de on Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 03:46:01PM +0100 References: <3C010429.C9D0C48E@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Message-ID: <20011126094330.P12761@areti.co.uk> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke wrote: > > its a long time ago that i configured a Pipline but as far as i can > > remember it can act as an DNS as well. > > This will not work in all cases as expected. > > The newer pipelines can maintain a local name list of 8 hosts maximum. > Name requests which can be served from this list will not be forwarded > to the Client DNS. > > You have to configure the names manually (it is not a DNS cache), the IP > addresses can be updated automatically. See yourself at Mod Config -> > DNS. > > Note that this will not be changed according to the provider you use. > Actually I can't see any difference between using the static list or > always the same external DNS regardless of the connection used. > > BTW, I haven't had any trouble resolving names on a DNS from a different > provider. Only if you use private names (local to the network behind a > connection profile) this won't work at all. > Yes, using just one ISP's DNS is what I do at the moment and it works OK but it must surely slow things down a little as the DNS requests have to be routed from the ISP where you are dialled in to the ISP whose DNS server you are using. As I have a Linux box on the SoHo network which stays on all the time one option is to set up a local DNS server on the Linux box and point all the other systems at that one. It's just a pity that the Pipeline can't act as a proper DNS server. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From James at superbug.demon.co.uk Sat Nov 24 19:17:09 2001 From: James at superbug.demon.co.uk (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: The Radius attribute 18 message is not put in any PPP packet. Feel free to write an RFC to do it. I think it would be very useful. PPP EAP has the potential to do the job. Cheers James > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeroen Veen > Sent: 22 November 2001 13:36 > To: 'James Courtier-Dutton'; ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX > TNT > > > That's what we currently do. > > Using the radius attribute seems like a more elegant option > though and that > also gives us the option to send back more usefull error messages than > "error -235256, connection was not established" and the likes. > > Looks like we're going to have to ask our software engineers to dive into > windows' ppp stack to get that message into some other window then :-). > > Greetings, > Jeroen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Courtier-Dutton [mailto:James@superbug.demon.co.uk] > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 1:35 PM > > To: Jeroen Veen; ascend-users@bungi.com > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply > > message) in a MAX > > TNT > > > > > > The message will only get displayed in the "Terminal windows > > after dial" > > screen. > > If the user is doing just PPP, the message will never be seen > > by the user. > > An approach some people take, is to put a filter on the user > > if they have > > not paid their bill, so that no matter which web site they > > try to get to, it > > will display the same "Pay bill please" web page. > > Cheers > > James > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Jeroen Veen > > > Sent: 22 November 2001 10:00 > > > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) > > in a MAX TNT > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > Does anyone here have any experience in/on (?) using these > > (Radius reply) > > > messages to send specific messages to a user? As in "You > > cannot log in > > > because you didn't pay your bill" and such. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jeroen Veen > > > Planet Media Group > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From shovey at buffnet.net Tue Nov 27 17:53:04 2001 From: shovey at buffnet.net (Stephen Hovey) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) WEIRD problem with a 6096 Message-ID: One of my 6096's has a problem where the upload from user speed is only something like 2400 baud, even though the other direction is normal. On all 4 Ts! Has anyone seen anything like that before? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From magic at area-net.com Tue Nov 27 19:45:28 2001 From: magic at area-net.com (Terry Lee, Publisher) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 6096 trunks not coming up Message-ID: <00e101c177ae$5b8c9800$cbe6160c@areanet.com> I have one 6096 out of a group that will not let the trunks come up unless I do a loopback test on the first trunk. Once I do that, all 4 come up, one afer the other. Any ideas on what is up with this thing? Could it have taken a lightning hit on the T1 interface or something? Terry Lee Area-Net, Inc. magic@area-net.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de Tue Nov 27 03:50:25 2001 From: Wolfgang.Beneicke at mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de (Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP References: <200111270645.WAA03503@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: <3C0361E1.23A1CA47@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Chris, I'd be happy to live with a certain delay in name resolutions rather than having to maintain a static name server database myself. Agreed, IMHO the pipeline would be much more practical if it would serve coffee as well. But it is a router, not a server. How will you fill up the local DNS then? You could type in all names that you know you'll be using. Then there are trillions that you don't know yet. AFAIK there is no "DNS cache" or self-learning DNS at the moment that would put any resolved name into a list. Even if your local list has stabilized after some time how do you cope with IP address changes? How do you notice? For proper updates you'd have to receive zone list updates from your provider regularily. Which he's not likely to do. Best regards, Wolfgang ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From chris at areti.co.uk Fri Nov 30 05:10:53 2001 From: chris at areti.co.uk (Chris Green) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Ascend pipeline - DNS setup if using more than one ISP In-Reply-To: <3C0361E1.23A1CA47@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de>; from Wolfgang.Beneicke@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:50:25AM +0100 References: <200111270645.WAA03503@max.bungi.com> <3C0361E1.23A1CA47@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> Message-ID: <20011130111053.A24659@areti.co.uk> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke wrote: > Chris, > > I'd be happy to live with a certain delay in name resolutions rather > than having to maintain a static name server database myself. > > Agreed, IMHO the pipeline would be much more practical if it would serve > coffee as well. But it is a router, not a server. > > How will you fill up the local DNS then? You could type in all names > that you know you'll be using. Then there are trillions that you don't > know yet. AFAIK there is no "DNS cache" or self-learning DNS at the > moment that would put any resolved name into a list. > Even if your local list has stabilized after some time how do you cope > with IP address changes? How do you notice? For proper updates you'd > have to receive zone list updates from your provider regularily. Which > he's not likely to do. > It's easy enough to set up a DNS server on a Linux box (in exactly the same way that your ISP does), that's what DNS is all about. The router has quite a powerful processor and thus should be equally capable of running 'proper' DNS if Ascend had written one for it. As it's a router then DNS is one of the things one might well expect it to do, more likely than coffee making anyway. There are routers (even quite cheap ones) which can be set up to provide proper DNS. -- Chris Green (chris@areti.co.uk) Home: chris@isbd.co.uk Work: cgreen@bcs.org.uk WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From maillist1 at argontech.net Fri Nov 30 10:59:52 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) PM3 Flash loosing mind References: Message-ID: <005801c179c0$6e009c20$3301fe8a@mcc3> I've got one Portmaster 3 that will not hold its boot code between power cycles. It will hold it's config data, but I have to tftp the bugger every time I cycle power. Anyone have any ideas? I assume it's a bad flash chip, I just don't know which one. Marco <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From savexshopmarketing at saveshopping.itctv.com Fri Nov 30 17:49:53 2001 From: savexshopmarketing at saveshopping.itctv.com (savexshopmarketing@saveshopping.itctv.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Gift ideas for your holydays Message-ID: <200111302301.PAA23322@max.bungi.com> Hello, www.savexshop.com, is the new online superstore that has everything you need as gift ideas for you and your lovers one. we had selected up to 1.000 products that you can choose from, and better news our prices starts from US$ 0.95 a item, and you can SAVE OVER 70 %, with no handling fee. you can find anything you need as: gift itens, robbies stuffs, houseware, automotive, toys, clothes, elestronics, beauty supplies, and much more. so do not lose time and money. Enjoy your holyday at: www.savexshop.com and have more free time for better things. Merry Christmas. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From maillist1 at argontech.net Fri Nov 30 14:54:17 2001 From: maillist1 at argontech.net (Marco C. Coelho) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT References: Message-ID: <01b901c179e1$2fe93660$3301fe8a@mcc3> As has been stated, most OS's just dump that on the floor. I've been thinking about just changing the radius group that user is in and forcing his gateway and dns servers to all point to a single web page with a payment message and cc processing capability. I have not furthered this though nor thought out the security aspects of how to ensure he can't get around the routing locks. Marco <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Texas' Best Internet Provider 6701 Interstate 30 West Greenville, Texas, 75402 903-455-5036 http://www.argontech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeroen Veen" To: Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 4:00 AM Subject: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT > Greetings, > > Does anyone here have any experience in/on (?) using these (Radius reply) > messages to send specific messages to a user? As in "You cannot log in > because you didn't pay your bill" and such. > > Thanks, > > Jeroen Veen > Planet Media Group > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From goemon at anime.net Fri Nov 30 17:40:04 2001 From: goemon at anime.net (Dan Hollis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Gift ideas for your holydays In-Reply-To: <200111302301.PAA23322@max.bungi.com> Message-ID: On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, savexshopmarketing@saveshopping.itctv.com wrote: > [... porno spam deleted ...] Time to change the mailing list software to only allow posting from subscribers, eh? -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Fri Nov 30 15:15:09 2001 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) APX 8000 / Radiator RADIUS Issue Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF00E2F04@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi All, I have a problem that I hope someone can help me with. I installed an APX 8000 running 9.0.4 TAOS and use a RADIUS program called Radiator running on Unix. Some users are in the 'user' file and some authenticate via the default user using the UNIX password file. The Radiator authenticates all users for about 2 hours and then all of a sudden, it fails. I get an error in the APX log that states there was a "RADIUS client timeout (code=1) for user xxxxx host xxxxxx" This error repeats for every user trying to authenticate until the RADIUS server is reset. After the reset, authentication is successful for another ~2 hours and then the timeouts begin again. There is no interruption of IP connectivity between the APX and the server. The RADIUS log file and syslog report errors as well. Prior to installing the APX, this exact RADIUS server authenticated users dialing in on PM3's without fail for years. Something is interrupting the Client/Server communication between the APX and the Radiator server. Also, these are 2 replicated servers that this occurs on. Both behave the exact same way. If anyone has seen this before or has any idea what the cause/solution could be, I'd be thrilled if you would share it. Thank You, David Pascarella, CCNA MCSE LSCP A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUNET TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Tue Nov 27 09:00:42 2001 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Using Radius attribute 18 (reply message) in a MAX TNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > The Radius attribute 18 message is not put in any PPP packet. > Feel free to write an RFC to do it. I think it would be very useful. > PPP EAP has the potential to do the job. It's already there. You can put a message in the PPP/PAP payload. Most system just discard it though. Some linux PPP builds will send it to syslog and from there it's up to however syslog.conf is configure to where it goes. I used to be able to do that with Linux dialing into a PortMaster. Windows just discards the message. -- Thomas C Kinnen - [RADIUS Engineer] - LUCENT Technologies INS "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Carlos.Morillo at CottonStates.com Tue Nov 27 13:38:47 2001 From: Carlos.Morillo at CottonStates.com (Morillo, Carlos) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Pipeline 50 and ISP Dynamic Addressing Message-ID: Can a Pipeline 50 be configured to call an ISP and use dynamic addressing? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From magic at area-net.com Wed Nov 28 11:28:25 2001 From: magic at area-net.com (Terry Lee, Publisher) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 6096 trunks not coming up References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011128090318.01e16020@63.169.132.241> Message-ID: <003201c17832$1656f4e0$cbe6160c@areanet.com> Interestingly, I can swap out this max with any of the others and the PRIs come right up without any such coaxing. It is only on the PRIs that are hooked to that particular MAX unit, i.e. the problem follows the MAX wherever I hook it, so it seems certain to be a trouble within the MAX unit itself. It is a lease unit, so I wonder if I shouldn't just contact them about it before it takes a turn for the worse. -Terry > Probably a timing issue on the PRIs with the Telco. I have seen that same > scenario on a few trunk-groups with some of our Telco interconnections, > too. And this is on a T-3 card on an Ascend MAX TNT device. > > -Nick > > > At 08:45 PM 11/27/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >I have one 6096 out of a group that will not let the trunks come up unless I > >do a loopback test on the first trunk. Once I do that, all 4 come up, one > >afer the other. > > > >Any ideas on what is up with this thing? Could it have taken a lightning hit > >on the T1 interface or something? > > > > > >Terry Lee > >Area-Net, Inc. > >magic@area-net.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MPuras at solunet.com Thu Nov 1 09:51:32 2001 From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) SNMP Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFB62@trinidad.solunet.com> Does anyone know what the equivalent to the below snmp variables would be for 9.0.x code? This is what we used on 8.0.x code but we have upgraded to 9.0.3 and the same variables dont work. We were using SNMP to set the necessary variables (sysConfigTftpHostAddr, sysConfigTftpFilename, and sysConfigTftpCmd) in the group below: enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpCmd.0 = save(1) enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpStatus.0 = ok(1) enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpHostAddr.0 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0 enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpFilename.0 = "" enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpPort.0 = 69 enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpParameter.0 = "" This works great on TNTs running 8.x code, but on the TNT running 9.0.3, the attempts to set the necessary variables timeout. Thanks, Mario Puras JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP SoluNet Technical Support ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Nov 1 10:54:02 2001 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:47 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) SNMP In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF02FFB62@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: I'm not an SNMP guru (or even close to it), but from what I've seen, there was quite a bit of stuff re-arranaged in the jump from 8.x to 9.x.. I think you'll find that if you update the MIBs, it'll start working, though it will probably cause your calls to the 8.x boxes to break. G'luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of MPuras@solunet.com ** Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:52 AM ** To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com ** Subject: (ASCEND) SNMP ** ** ** Does anyone know what the equivalent to the below snmp variables would be ** for 9.0.x code? ** ** This is what we used on 8.0.x code but we have upgraded to 9.0.3 and the ** same variables dont work. ** ** We were using SNMP to set the necessary variables (sysConfigTftpHostAddr, ** sysConfigTftpFilename, and sysConfigTftpCmd) in the group below: ** ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpCmd.0 = ** save(1) ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpS ** tatus.0 = ** ok(1) ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpH ** ostAddr.0 = ** IpAddress: 0.0.0.0 ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpF ** ilename.0 = ** "" ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpP ** ort.0 = 69 ** enterprises.ascend.systemStatusGroup.sysConfigTftp.sysConfigTftpP ** arameter.0 ** = "" ** ** ** This works great on TNTs running 8.x code, but on the TNT ** running 9.0.3, the ** attempts to set the necessary variables timeout. ** ** ** ** ** Thanks, ** ** ** Mario Puras ** JNCIS, CCNA, LSCP, MCP ** SoluNet Technical Support ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ ** To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ** Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ** ** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jim at top.net Tue Nov 20 18:18:06 2001 From: jim at top.net (Jim Logan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:01:53 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend Equipment Sale! Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20011120175923.02067d28@top.net> Ok, my once a week post (actually less than that lately) of Ascend Equipment Available, at special pre-holiday prices. These prices are good thru Friday 11/23. Pipe50's (P50-1UBRI, all IPSec/Firewall Equiped): $ 100 Each with Power Pipe75's (P75-1UBRI, Again all Later Model IP/Firewall): $ 150 Each with Power Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-T1 or ASA, also Firewall/IpSec): $ 295 Each w/ Power Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-V35): $ 225 Pipe130's (P130-LS56-2N-ASA): 225 Pipe 220 (P22-T1-V35): $200 Max Stuff: Max 200 Plus, NIB, with PCMCIA Cards for the ISDN Ports: $ 175 Max Multiband, PL-4BRI-STD: $ 175 Max Multiband, PL-1T1-STD: $ 175 Max 1800, MX18-8BRIU, New in the Box, complete unopened: $ 550 Max 1800, MX18-8BRIU, Unit and power cord: $ 450 Ea Max V.34 Cards (MX-SL-8MOD-V34): $ 25 each Max V.90 Cards (MX-SL-12Mod-S56): $ 200 each All items guarentee'd 30 days, new items contain warranty cards and may have longer warranty from Lucent. All items in excellent/refurb condition if not new. Payments accepted via Credit Cards, COD via Fedex, and some established customers qualify for 30 day Net. All items available for immediate shipment. Other than that - Have a Happy Turkey Day! (and Go Huskers!) ******* Top Net InterNet Services ******** Omaha, Nebraska www.top.net Voice: (402) 960-1494 Fax: (402) 333-8383 Pager: (402) 977-2880 ******************************************* ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/