I am looking for Mibs for Ascend and Portmasters ... i have this  Specific
oids 1.3.6.1.4.1.529 6 16 i don't know the description of these oids!

----- Original Message -----
From: <rte-ascend-request at lists.real-time.com>
To: <rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: rte-ascend digest, Vol 1 #546 - 9 msgs


> Send rte-ascend mailing list submissions to
> rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rte-ascend-request at lists.real-time.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rte-ascend-admin at lists.real-time.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of rte-ascend digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000, VLSM and OSPF (Peter Lalor)
>    2. Pipeline 85 and NAT (Stacy J. Dunkle)
>    3. Antwort: RE: (ASCEND) Max TNT IP-Pools (HKruell at swd-ag.de)
>    4. =?iso-8859-1?Q?TNT=20MPP=20question?= (freize at tiscalinet.ch)
>    5. (ASCEND) Need to buy 20 Lucent MAX 800 ASAP!
(Carlos.Morillo at CottonStates.com)
>    6. Re: (ASCEND) Max TNT IP-Pools (Rishi Sumbal)
>    7. (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error (J Bacher)
>    8. Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error (Paul Thomas)
>    9. RE: (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error (MPuras at solunet.com)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:34:45 -0800
> To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> From: Peter Lalor <plalor at infoasis.com>
> Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000, VLSM and OSPF
>
> >From: Chris Cook <ccook at tcworks.net>
> >
> >Does the MAX support VLSM on the dial-up pools when using OSPF?
>
> Yes.
>
> >I am
> >trying to designate a pool of addresses from a random block and when I
> >try to enable Pool Summary in the WAN Options
> >
> >Message #215
> >
> >Pool Summary Error
> >address/netmask
> >alignment error
>
> (Re)read the manual section on Pool Summary carefully. Your pools
> need to be network-aligned.
> --
>
> Peter Lalor
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:15:18 -0500
> From: "Stacy J. Dunkle" <sdunkle at pennswoods.net>
> Organization: Pennswoods.net
> To: rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com
> Subject: [Ascend] Pipeline 85 and NAT
>
>  I recently got a Lucent/Ascend Pipeline 85 ISDN router. I've been able
> to get everything working OK on it so far, with the exception of NAT
> forwarding.
>
>  Here's some details on my configuration: I have a static IP address
> through my ISP. I assigned the Pipeline it's own private IP,
> 192.168.100.100, and the computer it's own, 192.168.100.101, and I have
> everything set up correctly as far as dialing and regular internet
> access goes. I have a simple web server running on the computer. I'm
> using NAT, and have it configured for local and dest ports to 80, to the
> IP of the computer, 192.168.100.101.
>
>  If I type my true IP into a browser, it gets nothing. If I type the
> routers internal IP, still nothing. The only way I can get anything is
> if I type in the internal IP of the computer with the web server.
>
>  I've tried changing all sorts of settings, including entering my true
> static IP into the router, to no avail (and hosed everything quite a few
> times). I downloaded and installed the latest version of the on-board
> software, 8.0-101.0, to see if that would make a difference, (it didn't)
> and read over the documentation, and I still can't figure out what's
> keeping it from working.
>
>  Anyone have any ideas or suggestions?
>
> Thanks!
> Stace
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: HKruell at swd-ag.de
> To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:15:52 +0100
> Subject: [Ascend] Antwort: RE: (ASCEND) Max TNT IP-Pools
>
>
> Hello,
>
> if i do not use the "Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool" Attribute, how do i set wich
> pool to use?
>
> And another question comes up : Is there another step after configure the
> pools, to activate them ?
>
>
>
> thanks
> Heribert Kruell
> RemoteAccessManagement
> Stadtwerke Duesseldorf AG
> Germany
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:45:27 +0100
> From: freize at tiscalinet.ch
> To: rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com
> Subject: [Ascend] =?iso-8859-1?Q?TNT=20MPP=20question?=
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody some experience with the following:
>
> If a user connects to the TNT with one channel and he opens a second
channel,
> What happens if this second channel is connecting to another TNT in my
network
> when the first is full? Can I solve this issue somehow with multicast
>
> Tx for your help
>
> Florian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: Carlos.Morillo at CottonStates.com
> To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:44:33 -0500
> Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Need to buy 20 Lucent MAX 800 ASAP!
>
> Please, contact me with price and availability.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Carlos Morillo
> Atlanta, GA
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: Rishi Sumbal <rishi.sumbal at fr.easynet.net>
> To: "'ascend-users at max.bungi.com'" <ascend-users at max.bungi.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:40:46 +0100
> Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max TNT IP-Pools
>
> Hello,
>
> what do you want to do exactly ?
> because, the assignation of IP address is not "load-balanced" between
pools,
> so you don't really have to use
> Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool but pool-chaining=yes in the TNT, then when the
first
> pool has been totally used, you will automatically use the second and so
on
> ...
>
> Rishi
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:12:23 -0600
> To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> From: J Bacher <jb at jbacher.com>
> Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error
>
> We are seeing the following error on six 4048s -- all in different
locations:
>
> FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
>          Date: 12/24/2001.       Time: 11:59:15
>          Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b019258c b0194a5c b0072230
>
> or
>
> FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
>          Date: 06/01/2001.       Time: 22:14:06
>          Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b01925ac b0196434 b0078ed8
>
> A search on index 1 error is inconclusive.  Can anyone provide information
> regarding the location information that might shed some light on the units
> reloading?  Tia.
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:36:05 -0600
> To: J Bacher <jb at jbacher.com>, ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> From: Paul Thomas <pwthoma at anc.net>
> Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error
>
> --=======37F75F50=======
> Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-7028551B; charset=us-ascii;
format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> I'll agree that is a pretty generic error.
>
> I would try to get the nvram rebuilt (Diagnostic menu - fsave -
> nvramclear).  That may solve the problem.
>
> Another option would be to upgrade the IOS (ftp.ascend.com).  I've found
> the 7.0.4 code to be quite reliable.
>
> Paul
>
> At 10:12 AM 2/4/2002, J Bacher wrote:
>
> >We are seeing the following error on six 4048s -- all in different
locations:
> >
> >FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
> >         Date: 12/24/2001.       Time: 11:59:15
> >         Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b019258c b0194a5c b0072230
> >
> >or
> >
> >FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
> >         Date: 06/01/2001.       Time: 22:14:06
> >         Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b01925ac b0196434 b0078ed8
> >
> >A search on index 1 error is inconclusive.  Can anyone provide
information
> >regarding the location information that might shed some light on the
units
> >reloading?  Tia.
> >
> >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
> >
> >
> >
>
> --=======37F75F50=======--
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: MPuras at solunet.com
> To: jb at jbacher.com, ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:43:33 -0500
> Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> Fatal Index 1 is almost always a hardware error.  I say almost because it
> could be software as well.  This is the GENERAL fatal error that is not
real
> specific on what could be wrong.  I would start by changing codes.  If
that
> does not work, start to see if perhaps you have a defective modem card but
> chances are that you will experience reboots in the near future if you
have
> not seen them yet.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Mario Puras
> SoluNet Technical Support
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J Bacher [mailto:jb at jbacher.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:12 AM
> To: ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> Subject: (ASCEND) Max 4048 - Fatal Error
>
>
> We are seeing the following error on six 4048s -- all in different
> locations:
>
> FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
>          Date: 12/24/2001.       Time: 11:59:15
>          Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b019258c b0194a5c b0072230
>
> or
>
> FATAL ERROR:  Index: 1  Load: ftk.m40 Revision: 6.1.3
>          Date: 06/01/2001.       Time: 22:14:06
>          Location: b001d328 b001dac4 b001db44 b01925ac b0196434 b0078ed8
>
> A search on index 1 error is inconclusive.  Can anyone provide information
> regarding the location information that might shed some light on the units
> reloading?  Tia.
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> rte-ascend mailing list
> rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com
> https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend
>
>
> End of rte-ascend Digest