From krasice at yahoo.com Fri Nov 1 01:08:38 2002 From: krasice at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Krasi=20Zlatev?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) WTS: Max 3000 Message-ID: <20021101070838.66397.qmail@web20009.mail.yahoo.com> I'd like to sell a MAX 3000 remote access server. It has 30 built-in Series56 III modems. The modems can be upgraded up to 60, They support V.90, ISDN(128 and 64 kb/s). GDA software package is included. The MAX has 2 Wan ports and supports E1 and R2 signaling. ===== ______________________________________________________________________ Mio Yahoo!: personalizza Yahoo! come piace a te http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.my.yahoo.com/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri Nov 1 11:09:46 2002 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com (StopSpam@endjunkemail.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) STOP THE SPAM Message-ID: PM200011:09:46 AM An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021101/f390d73d/attachment.html From bogus@does.not.exist.com Fri Nov 1 11:09:21 2002 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com (StopSpam@endjunkemail.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) STOP THE SPAM Message-ID: PM200011:09:21 AM An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021101/02233eac/attachment.htm From hartala80 at hotmail.com Sat Nov 2 05:34:07 2002 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) error msg Message-ID: Dear All i have TNT with softwate rele 8.0.4 with d-channel enabled , i'm using PRI , the E1s is working good and accepting calls but i'm getting this error msg in tle log "[0/0/0/0] SEC GK Unregistered [0/0/0/0] PRI GK Unregistered " could anyone help thx _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections-- switch toMSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hartala80 at hotmail.com Mon Nov 4 07:02:51 2002 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disc/Prog code Message-ID: Dear All Do anyone have an explanation of the Disconnection/progress code " 181 - Call cleared by system / 7 - Undefined Progress Code 7 " thx _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From akohlsmith at benshaw.com Mon Nov 4 10:18:23 2002 From: akohlsmith at benshaw.com (Andrew Kohlsmith) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MaxTNT - how to configure to accept any password Message-ID: <200211041118.23706@-mixdown.ca> In the event of prolonged RADIUS failure or testing I would like to be able to configure our MaxTNT to accept any user/password as valid and let them on as if they were authenticated via normal channels. On Cisco it's dead simple, but I'm not sure how to do it on the MaxTNT. Regards, Andrew ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tkinnen at lucentradius.com Mon Nov 4 12:17:54 2002 From: tkinnen at lucentradius.com (Thomas C Kinnen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:20 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MaxTNT - how to configure to accept any password In-Reply-To: <200211041118.23706@-mixdown.ca> Message-ID: On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > In the event of prolonged RADIUS failure or testing I would like to be > able to configure our MaxTNT to accept any user/password as valid and > let them on as if they were authenticated via normal channels. > > On Cisco it's dead simple, but I'm not sure how to do it on the MaxTNT. Not sure on the TAOS side but on thing you could do is switch to a back RADIUS server that had a user file like: DEFAULT Auth-Type = Assert [reply stuff here] You may need to check the Auth-Type based on your RADIUS server but with NavisRadius 3.x or 4.x that would auth every user and takes less then 1 min to configure on the RADIUS server. Tom -- Thomas C Kinnen - RADIUS Engineer - LUCENT Technologies INS NavisRadius Pre-Sales Support: tech-sales@lucentradius.com NavisRadius Sales/License Questions: sales@lucentradius.com NavisRadius Support: access@lucent.com -or- http://www.lucent.com/support/ NavisRadius Forums: http://www.lucentradius.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi "All of the opinions stated above are my own and not my employer's, unless they were given to me by my employer" ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From MAILER-DAEMON at mail.firstworld.net Mon Nov 4 20:52:31 2002 From: MAILER-DAEMON at mail.firstworld.net (MAILER-DAEMON@mail.firstworld.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) failure notice Message-ID: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.firstworld.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29100 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2002 02:50:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bungi.com) ([200.207.131.21]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.firstworld.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Nov 2002 02:50:54 -0000 Reply-To: Message-ID: <028c80c24c2b$5856d0d2$4cc66ea4@txytii> From: To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: Blind Dater 0304bzQA3-666Jnh-15 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 01:35:51 +0200 MiME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Are you sick and tired of be home alone everynight? Does it make you mad that everone else but you has fun? Are you lloking for someone special but don't know where to look? At Udateme.com we have the answer to all your problems. Udateme.com will be one of the the best sites on the universe for meeting men and women.. Find what you are looking for http://www.udateme.com 0634UcQF1-098xjeL6310krrr7-l25 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rbailleu at kewanee.com Mon Nov 4 22:55:39 2002 From: rbailleu at kewanee.com (Robert Bailleu) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] dial up issues Message-ID: <008a01c28487$9670ee30$0200a8c0@kewanee1> Hi, I am a new isp. and I seem to have a few clients whose systems seems to have a communications problem. they can dial in get connected but nothing else. Everytime the recieved bytes = 430 or 429. nothing more. usually reinstalling the dialup connection fixes the problem. sometimes it takes reinstalling the modem. and once in took editing the registry to remove and reinstall communications. Usually its a windows 98 machine, but win me has an occasional problem, and once or twice on win xp. is it something I am doing on the ascend should be using a different dial up client. We are using a lucent max 6048 and free radius any suggestions would help. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021104/fb181145/attachment.html From tom at rydrcom.com Tue Nov 5 11:11:12 2002 From: tom at rydrcom.com (Tom Ryder) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend Max and MS IAS service Message-ID: I hope you do not mind, but I got your email from an old Ascend NG. We are in the process of upgrading our network and would like to use Microsoft's IAS to authenticate our users on AD in stead of using NavisRadius. Unfortunately there are none in South Africa who has done this before. Do you perhaps know where I can find some assistance in setting this up or if it is possible at all ? Regards Baltus le Roux South African Reserve Bank Tel. +27 12 313 3134 Fax. +27 12 313 3555 Cell. +27 82 320 0106 E-mail : baltus.leroux@resbank.co.za ************************************************************** "Disclaimer and confidentiality clause This message and any attachments relating to official business of the South African Reserve Bank (the "SARB") is proprietary to the SARB and intended for the original addressee only. The message may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in connection therewith. The SARB cannot ensure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception and/or interference. The SARB is not liable whatsoever for loss or damage resulting from the opening of this message and/or attachments and/or the use of the information contained in this message and/or attachments." From akohlsmith at benshaw.com Tue Nov 5 13:07:13 2002 From: akohlsmith at benshaw.com (Andrew Kohlsmith) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MaxTNT - how to configure to accept any password In-Reply-To: <009201c284eb$06e8db60$340bacd1@ext> References: <009201c284eb$06e8db60$340bacd1@ext> Message-ID: <200211051407.13314@-mixdown.ca> > read answer > list ppp > set receive-auth-mode = no-ppp-auth > wr THAT is what I need. Thank you! Regards, Andrew ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From info at qualitek.net Tue Nov 5 17:43:50 2002 From: info at qualitek.net (Qualitek) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:24 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Lucent MAX TNT In-Reply-To: <200211051407.13314@-mixdown.ca> Message-ID: Anyone interested in 10 TNT's configured as follows? Hardware: 1- TNT chassis. 1- TNT-SP-SC Shelf Controller w/options ISDN, VRouter, ANC, DS & DC 1- 32MB DRAM 1- 8MB Flash 2- TNT-SL-CT1 T1 interface cards 1- TNT-SL-E100 ethernet card 1- TNT-SL-HA192 card 1- Rackmount & cable kit 7- TNT-SL-48MOD-S56 48 port S56 modem cards (One spare) Total for 10 TNT's: $19,999.00 and we will provide free domestic shipping! Regards, Sean Bennett, Qualitek Services, Inc. www.Qualitek.Net 2215 Ringwood Ave. San Jose, CA 95131 PH: 408.597.0130 FX: 408.597.0131 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From schultess.uwe7484a22 at berlin.de Wed Nov 6 01:56:49 2002 From: schultess.uwe7484a22 at berlin.de (schultess.uwe7484a22@berlin.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) PROTECT YOUR COMPUTER AND YOUR VALUABLE INFORMATION! Message-ID: <015e36c46c3e$8422c5a8$5aa50eb0@kekpen> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021106/bc679991/attachment.html From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Wed Nov 6 01:04:29 2002 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (NET-LINK) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) WTS: MAX 6096's (2) Message-ID: <200211060104.AA292618482@netlinkcorp.com> Have a quantity of 2 Lucent MAX 6096's Excellent condition Factory default settings 6 of the 16 port 56k modems [MX-SL-16MOD-S56] [96 modems total in each] 4 T1 ports, Ethernet port Installed options FR/ISDN/DC/DS Power cable and console cable included 30 day warranty $1700.00 Ready to ship as needed ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. 276-326-1133 Phone netlink@netlinkcorp.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Gretchenct at thai2k.com.bungi.com Wed Nov 6 02:04:16 2002 From: Gretchenct at thai2k.com.bungi.com (Paula Boswell) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend-users Cure Work Stagnation Message-ID: YOUR DEGREE MAY BE CLOSER THAN YOU THINK We remove the obstacles that cause adults to abandon hope. DID YOU KNOW that you could earn your legitimate Associate's, Bachelor's, Master's or even Doctorate degree, utilizing your already existing professional or academic expertise? Prepare for the professional advancement you deserve If you are an adult with a high school diploma and have a minimum of three years of experience in the field you are seeking a degree in, YOU QUALIFY. As you know, employers continually hire, promote and give raises to new employees that have ZERO skills or experience, just because they have that piece of paper. Take part in the wealth now! Within days you can apply for that unreachable job, or show your degree to your employer and demand the raise and promotion that your knowledge and skills deserve. How does this work? You graduate without attending classes, or taking a leave of absence from your current job. You receive you degree based on life and work experience! The degree earned by our students enables them to qualify for career advancement and personal growth, while breaking down the wall that prevents them from receiving big money. Degree verification and official transcripts will be provided in writing when requested by employers and others authorized by the graduate. Our college & University transcripts meet the highest academic standards. Our University issues a degree printed on premium diploma paper, bearing an official gold raised college seal. No one is turned down. Confidentiality assured. CALL 1-602-230-4252 Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including Sundays and holidays. To be taken off our list reply with off as the subject. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From psc5 at powersupply.net Wed Nov 6 07:29:54 2002 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (John Kern) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Lucent MAX TNT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200211060829540144.03F24BB0@mail.powersupply.net> We are using Emerald/Radius NT 2.5 with all ascend boxes. Both 4K and 6K's. We have all the user settings assigned by the max. ascend-maximum time idle time etc. This has been working 100% for years and recently I have 2 users that are seeming to slip between the cracks and my max/accounting is not logging them off at the maximum time. I have even gone in and assigned special settings for these 2 users in their radius user profile, but yet they still elude the maximum time. Anyone see this issue or know how to fix it? Thanks, John i ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From psc5 at powersupply.net Wed Nov 6 07:45:07 2002 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (PowerNet Internet) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend 6096 help Message-ID: <000801c2859a$b92431d0$479c5bd8@john> We are using Emerald/Radius NT 2.5 with all ascend boxes. Both 4K and 6K's. We have all the user settings assigned by the max. ascend-maximum time idle time etc. This has been working 100% for years and recently I have 2 users that are seeming to slip between the cracks and my max/accounting is not logging them off at the maximum time. I have even gone in and assigned special settings for these 2 users in their radius user profile, but yet they still elude the maximum time. Anyone see this issue or know how to fix it? Thanks, John ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From info at qualitek.net Wed Nov 6 18:20:38 2002 From: info at qualitek.net (Qualitek) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Lucent MAX TNT & APX 8000 In-Reply-To: <200211060829540144.03F24BB0@mail.powersupply.net> Message-ID: 75- APX8-SL-96DSP, $1450ea. obo 20- TNT-SL-CE1, $1450ea. obo 10- TNT-H, 672 port 96DSP, v.92, VOIP, T3, $17,000ea. obo APX 8000's starting at $58K. All items above listed "Or Best Offer" so if you're in the market for APX or TNT equipment we will not be undersold! Regards, Sean Bennett, Qualitek Services, Inc. www.Qualitek.Net 2215 Ringwood Ave. San Jose, CA 95131 PH: 408.597.0130 FX: 408.597.0131 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From faisal at hamdard.net.pk Wed Nov 6 23:28:04 2002 From: faisal at hamdard.net.pk (Faisal S. Naik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX TNT E1 code problem Message-ID: <00eb01c2861e$72b4fd40$082d85ca@SNE2> Hello All, We recently got our MAX TNT box with 96 port DSP modems and a TAOS version 10.0 Due to some issues with the shipment of E1/T1 module, it was shipped separately. Now when the box was switched on it had no code for the E1/T1 module and according to our local vendor since the card was shipped separately and placed afterwards, the TAOS does not recognize the card unless and until the TAOS is reloaded on to the Flash. I state this because I do not understand the logic behind this issue or as presented by my vendor. A box that is supposed to work for the mere dial-up users through E1/T1s does not pick up or recognize the card if the card was placed afterwards?? Didnt Lucent knew this fact while loading the TAOS in TNT that the E1/T1 card will be loaded afterwards.. or is being shipped separately?? This simply does not make sense to us. One more thing the Docs on the Lucent documentation CD say for software version 9.0 where as the TAOS loaded is 10.0? Please advice. Thank you, -- Faisal Naik Karachi. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 10/31/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From croteau7668q57 at ncia.net Fri Nov 8 14:27:43 2002 From: croteau7668q57 at ncia.net (croteau7668q57@ncia.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Check these out! 8245p-5 Message-ID: <011d28d46c3b$1178d3e0$2ca87cc8@txabxq> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021108/89df810a/attachment.htm From paraiso at megasistemas.com Fri Nov 8 14:00:45 2002 From: paraiso at megasistemas.com (paraiso@megasistemas.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Software para Documentacion ISO-9000/14000 Message-ID: <-473330479.1036785672170.JavaMail.administrador@juane> !! Ahorre tiempo y dinero en su proceso certificacion !! Sientase como en el ParaISO, administrando el proceso de documentacion del Sistema de Calidad de su Empresa, con la ayuda de nuestro software especializado en estructurar, elaborar, manejar y controlar los documentos y registros, bajo las normas ISO 9000. Ademas incluye el modulo de auditorias internas de calidad, acciones preventivas y correctivas, indicadores de gestion y mucho mas... "ParaISO" es una aplicacion de Megasistemas Ltda., orientado a las organizaciones que estan en proceso de certificacion por ISO 9000, que ya estan certificadas y desean sistematizar sus procesos de documentacion y registros o que simplemente desean documentar su Sistema de Calidad. Si usted esta interesado en conocer el "ParaISO" visite : http://www.megasistemas.com/paraiso Nota : Este correo se escribe sin tildes. Si usted NO desea recibir esta informacion a su buzon de correo, acerca de productos o servicios, por favor ingrese su email para retirarlo de nuestra base de datos : http://www.megasistemas.com:8080/eliminar/eliminar_email.jsp porque nosotros deseamos respetar las politicas ANTI-SPAM y NO continuar enviandole correo no solicitado. From lo.ad at codetel.net.do Sat Nov 9 09:14:55 2002 From: lo.ad at codetel.net.do (Jordell Anderson) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] =?iso-8859-1?Q?Do_not_open_email_=22you_have_received_a_greeting_card_fro?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?m_Jordell?= Message-ID: Urgent Do not open email "you have received a greeting card from Jordell, I received an email that said you received a greeting card , as it was my birthday I thought it was legit. DO NOT open the greeting card or download the program to open it: Here is the greeting: Jordell, Terry has sent you a greeting card -- a postcard from Friend-Greetings.com. You can pickup your greeting card at Friend-Greetings.com by clicking on the link below. http://www.friend-greeting.com/203746/pickup.html?code=Jordell&id=0811021 Message: ------------------------------------------------------------ Jordell I just sent you a greeting card - please pick it up. Terry Please report this Spam and virus as it is very nasty. My apologies , Jordell From mfrater at quicksilver.co.nz Sun Nov 10 15:00:47 2002 From: mfrater at quicksilver.co.nz (Mark Frater) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:25 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT and gatekeepers Message-ID: <01de01c288fc$3eb9df20$0a8259ca@quicksilver.co.nz> Hi List, I am currently investigating gatekeepers for use with a TNT. I'd be interested to here from folks out there as to what you use and whether you recommend it or not. Regards Mark --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 03-Nov-02 From Kenneth.L.Miller at nwp01.usace.army.mil Sun Nov 10 22:28:43 2002 From: Kenneth.L.Miller at nwp01.usace.army.mil (Miller, Kenneth L NWP) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) How do I reset MAX defaults Message-ID: <0B5430887D95D411AEAE00508BE3AA6A0533B1B6@nwpmail01.nwp.usace.army.mil> Good Afternoon, I have inherited a MAX 6000 box and the person who had it before me can't remember what the Superuser Password is. Is there a way to reset the box to the factory defaults???? Thanks Ken NOTE: This is being sent from a totally different mailer, if you are receiving this in MIME format, please check your email settings. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From b.weeber at viastore.de Mon Nov 11 03:13:04 2002 From: b.weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) How do I reset MAX defaults In-Reply-To: <0B5430887D95D411AEAE00508BE3AA6A0533B1B6@nwpmail01.nwp.usace.army.mil> Message-ID: <003f01c28962$8a7f3cf0$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> If you have a tftp-server and you can remember the read-write community (default:"write") you can download the entire config including clear passwords to the tftp-server. See manual and/or release notes how to it. Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Miller, > Kenneth L > NWP > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:29 AM > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > Subject: (ASCEND) How do I reset MAX defaults > > > Good Afternoon, > > > I have inherited a MAX 6000 box and the person who had it > before me > can't remember what the Superuser Password is. Is there a > way to reset the > box to the factory defaults???? > > Thanks > > Ken > > NOTE: This is being sent from a totally different mailer, if you are > receiving this in MIME format, please check your email settings. > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 11 08:41:43 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Curiosity?? Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B368@trinidad.solunet.com> Is it me or is it taking up to a month for some replies to get posted on this board? I sent this response out over three weeks ago! This is ALMOST as slow as Lucent's website!?! (sorry, couldn't resist) I may not speak for everyone, but, if I'm going to take the time to help someone, I'd like to see them get the info while they can use it!! - David 11/11/2002 -----Original Message----- From: DPascarella@solunet.com [mailto:DPascarella@solunet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:56 PM To: deckman@esisoft.us; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Also, I believe that when you enable IP filters, there is an implicit deny just like a Cisco ACL. So if you are blocking specific traffic only (telnet,FTP), make sure to add a 'forward any' at the end. If you are just wanting to allow specific traffic only (WWW,ARP), than do not add the 'forward any' filter. Just my $.02 - David -----Original Message----- From: Joe Max [mailto:max_and_tnt@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:10 PM To: deckman@esisoft.us; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Yes, it can do that. Use either filters or firewalls (or both). For firewalls, you need an external program (SCM?) which is run on a Windoze machine and then downloaded into the pipeline. For filters on the ethernet port, always remember to add a forward entry for ARPs or you won't be able to talk to the box. >From: "Daniel R. Eckman" > >Hello >I have a question for anyone. >I have just acquired an Ascend Pipeline 130 for my business and cannot seem >to get the firewall up and functioning. I am trying to set it up so that I >can use my systems from home, but block others from doing the same. Is >this >product capable of doing that? I have tried to set up the filters , but I >can't seem to get them to function properly. > >Any info anyone might have will help. _ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dlr at bungi.com Mon Nov 11 02:46:56 2002 From: dlr at bungi.com (Dave Rand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: DPascarella@solunet.com's message on Nov 11, 9:41. Message-ID: [In the message entitled "(ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 11, 9:41, DPascarella@solunet.com writes:] > Is it me or is it taking up to a month for some replies to get posted on > this board? I sent this response out over three weeks ago! This is ALMOST > as slow as Lucent's website!?! (sorry, couldn't resist) I may not speak > for everyone, but, if I'm going to take the time to help someone, I'd like > to see them get the info while they can use it!! > Uh, no. There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. 100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past 3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or poor connectivity. -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 11 12:29:17 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B36F@trinidad.solunet.com> OK...Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: dlr@bungi.com [mailto:dlr@bungi.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 3:47 AM To: DPascarella@solunet.com; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? [In the message entitled "(ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 11, 9:41, DPascarella@solunet.com writes:] > Is it me or is it taking up to a month for some replies to get posted on > this board? I sent this response out over three weeks ago! This is ALMOST > as slow as Lucent's website!?! (sorry, couldn't resist) I may not speak > for everyone, but, if I'm going to take the time to help someone, I'd like > to see them get the info while they can use it!! > Uh, no. There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. 100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past 3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or poor connectivity. -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From skipmax at seacove.net Mon Nov 11 13:19:09 2002 From: skipmax at seacove.net (Dennis Duval) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? References: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B36F@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: <000a01c289b7$366f4ec0$0a01a8c0@barny> > There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. > 100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past > 3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or > poor connectivity. Sorry, but I don't agree with these numbers. I have found this list to be the slowest list of some 10 or so that I subscribe to, resulting in sometimes difficult discussions on this list. Even the headers of the letter from your posting shows that bungi.com held it for nearly 10 minutes before sending it to my mail server, which has very good connectivity and availablity. Often it takes 30 minutes or an hour to see my own postings to this list, which always leave my mail server with a few seconds of sending. I have not, however, seen any messages being sent after extremely long periods, such as a month delay. FWIW, I'm sending this posting at 13:18 CST Dennis Duval ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 11 15:17:30 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B374@trinidad.solunet.com> You can see from my outgoing header that the message is dated October 15 and was posted (globally) on November 11th. I don't think my connection is THAT slow or our email server is causing the problem. Anything's possible, but I send/receive e-mails all over the world, everyday...all day. I never have to wait for more than a few seconds at the most. Anyway, I just wanted to throw it "out there" and see if anyone else was having the same experience. If so, I hope the feedback can be used to improve things, if needed. I enjoy this list and would like to contribute to it in any way. Thanks for your response Dennis. I agree, - David -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Duval [mailto:skipmax@seacove.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? > There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. > 100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past > 3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or > poor connectivity. Sorry, but I don't agree with these numbers. I have found this list to be the slowest list of some 10 or so that I subscribe to, resulting in sometimes difficult discussions on this list. Even the headers of the letter from your posting shows that bungi.com held it for nearly 10 minutes before sending it to my mail server, which has very good connectivity and availablity. Often it takes 30 minutes or an hour to see my own postings to this list, which always leave my mail server with a few seconds of sending. I have not, however, seen any messages being sent after extremely long periods, such as a month delay. FWIW, I'm sending this posting at 13:18 CST Dennis Duval ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- From: DPascarella@solunet.com [mailto:DPascarella@solunet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:56 PM To: deckman@esisoft.us; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Also, I believe that when you enable IP filters, there is an implicit deny just like a Cisco ACL. So if you are blocking specific traffic only (telnet,FTP), make sure to add a 'forward any' at the end. If you are just wanting to allow specific traffic only (WWW,ARP), than do not add the 'forward any' filter. Just my $.02 - David ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Mon Nov 11 15:26:25 2002 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: <000a01c289b7$366f4ec0$0a01a8c0@barny> References: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B36F@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20021112102625.00a74b60@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 13:19 11/11/02 -0600, Dennis Duval wrote: >> There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. >> 100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past >> 3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or >> poor connectivity. > >Sorry, but I don't agree with these numbers. I have found this list to be >the slowest list of some 10 or so that I subscribe to, resulting in >sometimes difficult discussions on this list. Even the headers of the >letter from your posting shows that bungi.com held it for nearly 10 minutes >before sending it to my mail server, which has very good connectivity and >availablity. Often it takes 30 minutes or an hour to see my own postings to >this list, which always leave my mail server with a few seconds of sending. I don't post to this list very often, but I typically see delays of 15 to 30 minutes before seeing my own message come back, and our mail server isn't down, broken, and doesn't have poor connectivity either ;-) Regards, Simon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dlr at bungi.com Mon Nov 11 07:31:55 2002 From: dlr at bungi.com (Dave Rand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: DPascarella@solunet.com's message on Nov 11, 16:17. Message-ID: [In the message entitled "RE: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 11, 16:17, DPascarella@solunet.com writes:] > You can see from my outgoing header that the message is dated October 15 and > was posted (globally) on November 11th. I don't think my connection is THAT > slow or our email server is causing the problem. Anything's possible, but I > send/receive e-mails all over the world, everyday...all day. I never have to > wait for more than a few seconds at the most. Anyway, I just wanted to > throw it "out there" and see if anyone else was having the same experience. > If so, I hope the feedback can be used to improve things, if needed. I > enjoy this list and would like to contribute to it in any way. > There is no place for a message to be held on my systems for longer than 24 hours. The message you quoted is in the archives for last month, in the correct sequence. Here's the headers from it. You sent it 16:55:39, it hit my gateway at 13:55:24, and went for distribution at 13:55:26. If you didn't get it until today, your mailer is broken, your software is broken, someone on your system restored some backups, or some other glitch happened on your network... My mail logs don't go back that far, so I can't confirm when your system received it, but there is no chance that it was held here, in any fashion, for over 24 hours. >From owner-ascend-users Tue Oct 15 13:55:26 2002 Received: by max.bungi.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) id NAA16745 for ascend-users-outgoing; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: max.bungi.com: majordom set sender to owner-ascend-use rs using -f Received: from rdaver.bungi.com (rdaver.bungi.com [207.126.97.23]) by max.bungi.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA16740 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:25 -0700 (PDT) From: DPascarella@solunet.com Received: from smtpgateway.solunet.com(really [208.243.162.162]) by rdaver.bungi .com via sendmail with esmtp id for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.94 1997-Apr-22 #237 built 2002-Jun-12) Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B298@trinidad.solunet.com> To: deckman@esisoft.us, ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:55:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-ascend-users Precedence: bulk -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Mon Nov 11 15:59:27 2002 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20021112105927.00a782b0@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 08:46 11/11/02 +0000, Dave Rand wrote: >[In the message entitled "(ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 11, 9:41, DPascarella@solunet.com writes:] >> Is it me or is it taking up to a month for some replies to get posted on >> this board? I sent this response out over three weeks ago! This is ALMOST >> as slow as Lucent's website!?! (sorry, couldn't resist) I may not speak >> for everyone, but, if I'm going to take the time to help someone, I'd like >> to see them get the info while they can use it!! >> > >Uh, no. > >There is, on average, a 3 minute time to reach 80% of the subscribers. >100% of the mail is delivered within 24 hours. All of the delay past >3 minutes is due to the recipient's mail system being down, broken, or >poor connectivity. Dave, Did you check the headers of the message in question ? I guess not. Let me post the pertinent ones for you: Received: from sprite.real-time.com (lists.real-time.com [208.20.202.12]) by mail.igrin.co.nz (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAB4t6e17060 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:55:06 +1300 Received: from sprite.real-time.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sprite.real-time.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAB4mSA18505; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:48:28 -0600 Received: from max.bungi.com (max.bungi.com [207.126.97.7]) by sprite.real-time.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9FLNOK01059 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:23:24 -0500 Received: by max.bungi.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) id NAA16745 for ascend-users-outgoing; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: max.bungi.com: majordom set sender to owner-ascend-users using -f Received: from rdaver.bungi.com (rdaver.bungi.com [207.126.97.23]) by max.bungi.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA16740 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:25 -0700 (PDT) From: DPascarella@solunet.com Received: from smtpgateway.solunet.com(really [208.243.162.162]) by rdaver.bungi.com via sendmail with esmtp id for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.94 1997-Apr-22 #237 built 2002-Jun-12) Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B298@trinidad.solunet.com> Notice sprite.real-time.com receiving the message from max.bungi.com on 15 October, and then the next step (presumably the mailing list softaware, posting from localhost at sprite.real-time.com) is suddenly 11 November ? Seems like almost a month to me, so the original poster was right. I sent a message to this list approximately 30 minutes ago, I have yet to see my own post come back, and this is not uncommon. (The message was accepted by rdavor.bungi.com 3 seconds after sending) I have to agree with Dennis, I'm also on about 10 different mailing lists and this is easily the slowest by far. For reference, this message was posted at 10:59am NZST. (9:59pm GMT) Regards, Simon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dlr at bungi.com Mon Nov 11 08:12:34 2002 From: dlr at bungi.com (Dave Rand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: Simon Byrnand's message on Nov 12, 10:59. Message-ID: [In the message entitled "Re: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 12, 10:59, Simon Byrnand writes:] > > Notice sprite.real-time.com receiving the message from max.bungi.com on 15 > October, and then the next step (presumably the mailing list softaware, > posting from localhost at sprite.real-time.com) is suddenly 11 November ? > Seems like almost a month to me, so the original poster was right. > Note that max.bungi.ocm is where the list is run. If there was a delay at real-time.com, that's out of my control. So, the orginal poster may have a problem, but it isn't here at bungi.com where the lists are run. -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Mon Nov 11 16:18:35 2002 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20021112111835.00a00cd0@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 14:12 11/11/02 +0000, Dave Rand wrote: >[In the message entitled "Re: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 12, 10:59, Simon Byrnand writes:] >> >> Notice sprite.real-time.com receiving the message from max.bungi.com on 15 >> October, and then the next step (presumably the mailing list softaware, >> posting from localhost at sprite.real-time.com) is suddenly 11 November ? >> Seems like almost a month to me, so the original poster was right. >> > >Note that max.bungi.ocm is where the list is run. If there was a >delay at real-time.com, that's out of my control. > >So, the orginal poster may have a problem, but it isn't here at bungi.com >where the lists are run. Excuse my ignorance, but how does real-time.com fit into the scheme of things if its not related to the mailing list ? What is its purpose ? If it is an essential part of the delivery of this list to subscribers, then if it holds messages for hours or days before sending them on, then it doesn't matter from the point of view of list subscribers exactly where the fault lies, the end result is the same... Regards, Simon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dlr at bungi.com Mon Nov 11 08:23:05 2002 From: dlr at bungi.com (Dave Rand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: Simon Byrnand's message on Nov 12, 11:18. Message-ID: [In the message entitled "Re: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 12, 11:18, Simon Byrnand writes:] > > > >Note that max.bungi.ocm is where the list is run. If there was a > >delay at real-time.com, that's out of my control. > > > >So, the orginal poster may have a problem, but it isn't here at bungi.com > >where the lists are run. > > Excuse my ignorance, but how does real-time.com fit into the scheme of > things if its not related to the mailing list ? No idea. There are three subscribers on the list at real-time.com. tanner@real-time.com rte-ascend@listserv.real-time.com natecars@real-time.com > > What is its purpose ? > > If it is an essential part of the delivery of this list to subscribers, > then if it holds messages for hours or days before sending them on, then it > doesn't matter from the point of view of list subscribers exactly where the > fault lies, the end result is the same... > It is not an essential part of the list. ascend-users-request@bungi.com is where subscription requests go, and the list is maintained here. If real-time.com is offering downstreams subscriptions (and I don't know if they are, or aren't), then the problem lies solely there. As far as I'm concerned, they are just another subscriber. -- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From simon at igrin.co.nz Mon Nov 11 16:34:01 2002 From: simon at igrin.co.nz (Simon Byrnand) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity?? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20021112113401.00a0a780@mail.igrin.co.nz> At 14:23 11/11/02 +0000, Dave Rand wrote: >[In the message entitled "Re: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Curiosity??" on Nov 12, 11:18, Simon Byrnand writes:] >> > >> >Note that max.bungi.ocm is where the list is run. If there was a >> >delay at real-time.com, that's out of my control. >> > >> >So, the orginal poster may have a problem, but it isn't here at bungi.com >> >where the lists are run. >> >> Excuse my ignorance, but how does real-time.com fit into the scheme of >> things if its not related to the mailing list ? > >No idea. There are three subscribers on the list at real-time.com. > >tanner@real-time.com >rte-ascend@listserv.real-time.com >natecars@real-time.com > > >> >> What is its purpose ? >> >> If it is an essential part of the delivery of this list to subscribers, >> then if it holds messages for hours or days before sending them on, then it >> doesn't matter from the point of view of list subscribers exactly where the >> fault lies, the end result is the same... >> > >It is not an essential part of the list. ascend-users-request@bungi.com >is where subscription requests go, and the list is maintained here. > >If real-time.com is offering downstreams subscriptions (and I don't know if >they are, or aren't), then the problem lies solely there. As far as I'm >concerned, they are just another subscriber. Ah..... Now we're onto the real problem. I checked back through my folder to my initial subscription and I used the page: https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend So it looks like they are definately offering downstream subscriptions to the list. The interesting thing is that their pages are misleading in the sense that there is no indication that they are not the authorative version of the list, and that they are only doing downstream subscriptions. I had no reason to suspect this at the time I subscribed. Ok, hands up everyone reading this who is actually going via real-time.com's downstream subscription ? A number, I would imagine, including the people experiencing delays. So what is the exact method to subscribe to the "real" version of the list ? The word subscribe in the body of a message to ascend-users-request@bungi.com ? I'll unsubscribe from the real-time.com version of the list and subscribe to the "real" one. I suggest anyone else experiencing delays do the same :) Thanks Dave Regards, Simon ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Nov 12 06:54:59 2002 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Lucent/Ascend Max 6096 - w 4 T1s Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20021112065459.01b74120@mail.rockriver.net> MX60-T1AC-96NA ISDN FR DS DC AC power supply 96 modems in 6 - 16 port cards. Excellent condition. Guaranteed for 90 days. $1750 OBO. Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Tue Nov 12 06:55:30 2002 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) FS: Lucent/Ascend Max 6048 - w 4 T1s Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20021112065530.01b85830@mail.rockriver.net> MX60-T1AC-96NA DS DC AC power supply 48 modems in 3 - 16 port cards. 3 empty modem slots with covers. Excellent condition. Guaranteed for 90 days. $1350 OBO. Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From lo.ad at codetel.net.do Tue Nov 12 07:57:12 2002 From: lo.ad at codetel.net.do (Jordell Anderson) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Removel Instuctions for Greeting Card Virus Message-ID: Removal instructions http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/friendgreetings.html From acqscott at eaze.net Tue Nov 12 10:19:08 2002 From: acqscott at eaze.net (Scott) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Lucent TNT-HDLC2-EC-C for sale Message-ID: <045201c28a67$3aac7340$1c00a8c0@ACQ2> I have (7) Lucent TNT-HDLC2-EC-C boards for sale. If interested, please let me know ASAP. Asking $275ea. Thanks, Scott From naminda at sltnet.lk Tue Nov 12 21:53:28 2002 From: naminda at sltnet.lk (naminda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 6000 snmp traps Message-ID: Hi all, we have some MAX 6000.I tried enabled snmp traps as per the ascend documents.But my NMS doesn't receive traps when stimulate alarms. Naminda Network Engineer Sri Lanka Telecom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From denise at cernet.com.br Wed Nov 13 13:02:48 2002 From: denise at cernet.com.br (Denise R. dos Santos) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT - error Message-ID: <000d01c28b47$428a6460$ab00000a@cernet.com.br> Hi, people, I'm Denise from Brazil, I've a costumer thas has a TNT, and sometimes in fatal-erros we can see the errors below: SYSTEM RESET OCCURRED: Index: 385 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 12:21:04 Location: 100979a4 10096abc 1029b3dc 1029b484 1029b71c 10092690 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 12:21:04 SYSTEM RESET OCCURRED: Index: 385 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 20:19:18 Location: 100979a4 10096abc 1029b3dc 1029b484 1029b71c 10092690 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 20:19:18 SYSTEM RESET OCCURRED: Index: 385 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 21:53:01 Location: 100979a4 10096abc 1029b3dc 1029b484 1029b71c 10092690 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Revision: 9.0.3c3 Shelf 1 (tntsre) Date: 11/10/2002. Time: 21:53:01 What is the erros index 385?? Anyone can help me??? Thanks Denise ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From william.d.white at attbi.com Fri Nov 15 10:21:41 2002 From: william.d.white at attbi.com (Billy White) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend MX-SL-6PMHP Message-ID: <002001c28cc3$18016090$3c66ed0c@D8M1GY11> Looking for quantity of MX-SL-6PMHP with cables. Please send me your P & A if you have stock. Thank you, william.d.white@attbi.com Office: 972-881-0446 Cell:??? 214-336-2135 Fax:??? 972-509-8471 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Bob at Bradlee.org Fri Nov 15 10:29:02 2002 From: Bob at Bradlee.org (Bob Bradlee) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Nindy problems with MX1800 and MX2000 Message-ID: I have several BRI lines coming into the house feeding an MAX1800, it has come to the point where I need to upgrade the MAX as it no longer handshakes with the MAX4004 on the other end. I am not sure what happened but they tell me I need to upgrade the MX1800 from 4.6cp8 something 6.x or later, I chose to use 7.0.28. Piece of Cake, I grabbed a laptop, connected up and and much to my dismay CtL'D does not give me Download as an option ? I don't care about the existing config, so I pop the box open, set the jumper, switched to 56k and powered up forcing a Nindy. Got the Nindy banner and prompt => as expected but then it just sits ignoring all Input. :( I refuse to be slowed down, so I run over to the shop and grab a MX2000 that I robbed the 56k cards from last year, and an 8BRIT card and head home with a big smile on my face. To make a long story short, it turns out the MX2000 was "scraped" and written off the books well over a year ago and the "Password" is now lost. So I pop the top, plug the jumper, start Nindy and it responds just like the MX1800 just sitting there ignoring all input. Thinking my laptop was getting even with me for my ignoring it, , I grabbed a Pipeline 75, poped the cover, and Nindyed sucessfully. A second try with both the 1800 and 2000, produced no joy. I did a second P85 which is now holding one line up untill I get the 1800 or 2000/8brit working. I plan on picking up a second bare MX2000 later this afternoon. That way I have a spare to destroy, if I reach "that magic point", this weekend :( I hope someone can point out what I am overlooking ! It has been several years since I kicked this sleeping dog, I should not be supprised that I got bit :) Thanks in advance, Bob ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jormande at email.com Fri Nov 15 20:44:10 2002 From: jormande at email.com (Jonathan Mande) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Private Message-ID: <200211151944.gAFJiBA17257@sprite.real-time.com> JONATHAN MANDE Email: jormande9@netscape.net ATTENTION, FIRST, I MUST SOLICIT YOUR CONFIDENCE IN THIS TRANSACTION, THIS IS BY VIRTUE OF IT`S NATURE AS BEING UTTERLY CONFIDENTIAL AND TOP SECRET THOUGH I KNOW THAT A TRANSACTION OF THIS MAGNITUDE WILL MAKE ANY ONE APPREHENSIVE AND WORRIED BUT I AM ASSURING YOU THAT ALL WILL BE WELL AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE HAVE DECIDED TO CONTACT YOU DUE TO THE URGENCY OF THIS TRANSACTION. LET ME START BY INTRODUCING MY SELF TO YOU I AM MR JONATHAN MANDE AN ACCOUNTANT WITH THE AMALGAMATED BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA. (ABSA) I CAME TO KNOW YOU IN MY PRIVATE SEARCH FOR A RELIABLE AND REPUTABLE PERSON TO HANDLE THIS CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTION WHICH INVOLVES THE TRANSFER OF A HUGE SUM OF MONEY TO A FOREIGN ACCOUNT REQUIRING MAXIMUM CONFIDENCE. THE PROPOSITION A FOREIGNER, LATE ENGINEER JOHNSON CREEK AN OIL MERCHANT/CONTRACTOR WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA, UNTILL HIS DEATH SIX YEARS AGO IN A GHASTLY AIR CRASH, (ETHIOPIAN AIRLINE BOEING 767 ON THE NOVEMBER 23RD 1996) BANKED WITH US HERE AT ABSA BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA, AND HAD A CLOSING BALANCE OF US$21,500, 000 (TWENTY ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ONLY) WHICH THE BANK UNQUESTIONABLY EXPECTS IT TO BE CLAIMED BY ANY AVAILABLE FOREIGN NEXT-OF-KIN OF THE LATE BENEFICIARY OR ALTERNATIVELY BE DONATED TO A DISCREDITED TRUST FUND FOR ARMS AND AMMUNITION AT A MILITARY WAR COLLEGE HERE IN SOUTH AFRICA. FERVENT VALUABLE EFFORT HAVE BEEN MADE BY MY BANK TO GET IN TOUCH WITH ANY OF THE CREEK FAMILY OR RELATIVE BUT PROVED TO NO AVAIL. IT IS BECAUSE OF THE PERCIVED POSSIBILITY OF NOT BEING ABLE TO LOCATE ANY OF THE LATE ENGR. JOHNSON CREEK`S NEXT-OF-KIN (HE HAD NO KNOWN WIFE AND CHILDREN) THAT THE MANAGEMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF OUR CHAIRMAN AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THAT AN ARRENGMENT BE MADE FOR THE FUNDS TO BE DECLARED "UNCLAIMABLE" AND SUBSEQUENTLY BE DONATED TO THE TRUST FUND FOR ARMS AND AMMUNITION TO FURTHER ENHANCE THE COURSE OF WAR IN AFRICA AND THE WORLD IN GENERAL AND TO UP LIFT THE IMAGE OF THE BANK. IN ORDER TO AVERT THIS NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT, SOME OF MY TRUSTED COLLEAGUES AND I NOW SEEK YOUR PERMISSION TO HAVE YOU STAND AS THE NEXT-OF-KIN TO LATE ENGR. JOHNSON CREEK SO THAT THE FUNDS US$21.5M WOULD BE RELEASED AND PAID INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AS THE BENEFICIARY NEXT-OF-KIN, ALL DOCUMENTS AND PROVES TO ENABLE YOU GET THIS FUND WILL BE CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND MORESO WE ARE ASSURING YOU OF 100% RISK FREE INVOLVEMENT, YOUR SHARE STAYS WHILE THE REST WILL BE FOR MY SELF AND MY COLLEAGUE FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSE IN YOUR COUNTRY. WE HAVE AGREED THAT THE FUNDS WILL BE SHARED THUS. AFTER IT HAS BEEN TRANSFERED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT. 1. 20% FOR YOU FOR ACTING AS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE FUNDS. 2. 5% WILL BE SET ASIDE FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO BOTH PARTIES FOR ANY INCIDENTAL EXPENSES THAT MAY BE INCURRED IN THE COURSE OF THE TRANSFER, (TELEPHONE AND FAX BILLS) 3. 75% FOR US THE ORIGINATORS OF THE TRANSACTION. IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ALRIGHT BY YOU, THEN KINDLY GET TO ME IMMEDIATELY VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS jormande9@netscape.net (ONLY) AND FURNISH ME WITH YOUR MOST CONFIDENTIAL TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS AND EXCLUSIVE BANK PARTICULARS SO THAT I CAN USE THESE INFORMATIONS TO APPLY FOR THE RELEASE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER OF THE FUNDS IN YOUR FAVOUR. THANKING YOU IN ANTICIPATION OF YOUR CO-OPERATION. YOURS FAITHFULLY. MR. JONATHAN MANDE From jormande at email.com Fri Nov 15 20:44:10 2002 From: jormande at email.com (Jonathan Mande) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Private Message-ID: <200211151944.gAFJiBA17258@sprite.real-time.com> JONATHAN MANDE Email: jormande9@netscape.net ATTENTION, FIRST, I MUST SOLICIT YOUR CONFIDENCE IN THIS TRANSACTION, THIS IS BY VIRTUE OF IT`S NATURE AS BEING UTTERLY CONFIDENTIAL AND TOP SECRET THOUGH I KNOW THAT A TRANSACTION OF THIS MAGNITUDE WILL MAKE ANY ONE APPREHENSIVE AND WORRIED BUT I AM ASSURING YOU THAT ALL WILL BE WELL AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE HAVE DECIDED TO CONTACT YOU DUE TO THE URGENCY OF THIS TRANSACTION. LET ME START BY INTRODUCING MY SELF TO YOU I AM MR JONATHAN MANDE AN ACCOUNTANT WITH THE AMALGAMATED BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA. (ABSA) I CAME TO KNOW YOU IN MY PRIVATE SEARCH FOR A RELIABLE AND REPUTABLE PERSON TO HANDLE THIS CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTION WHICH INVOLVES THE TRANSFER OF A HUGE SUM OF MONEY TO A FOREIGN ACCOUNT REQUIRING MAXIMUM CONFIDENCE. THE PROPOSITION A FOREIGNER, LATE ENGINEER JOHNSON CREEK AN OIL MERCHANT/CONTRACTOR WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA, UNTILL HIS DEATH SIX YEARS AGO IN A GHASTLY AIR CRASH, (ETHIOPIAN AIRLINE BOEING 767 ON THE NOVEMBER 23RD 1996) BANKED WITH US HERE AT ABSA BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA, AND HAD A CLOSING BALANCE OF US$21,500, 000 (TWENTY ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ONLY) WHICH THE BANK UNQUESTIONABLY EXPECTS IT TO BE CLAIMED BY ANY AVAILABLE FOREIGN NEXT-OF-KIN OF THE LATE BENEFICIARY OR ALTERNATIVELY BE DONATED TO A DISCREDITED TRUST FUND FOR ARMS AND AMMUNITION AT A MILITARY WAR COLLEGE HERE IN SOUTH AFRICA. FERVENT VALUABLE EFFORT HAVE BEEN MADE BY MY BANK TO GET IN TOUCH WITH ANY OF THE CREEK FAMILY OR RELATIVE BUT PROVED TO NO AVAIL. IT IS BECAUSE OF THE PERCIVED POSSIBILITY OF NOT BEING ABLE TO LOCATE ANY OF THE LATE ENGR. JOHNSON CREEK`S NEXT-OF-KIN (HE HAD NO KNOWN WIFE AND CHILDREN) THAT THE MANAGEMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF OUR CHAIRMAN AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THAT AN ARRENGMENT BE MADE FOR THE FUNDS TO BE DECLARED "UNCLAIMABLE" AND SUBSEQUENTLY BE DONATED TO THE TRUST FUND FOR ARMS AND AMMUNITION TO FURTHER ENHANCE THE COURSE OF WAR IN AFRICA AND THE WORLD IN GENERAL AND TO UP LIFT THE IMAGE OF THE BANK. IN ORDER TO AVERT THIS NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT, SOME OF MY TRUSTED COLLEAGUES AND I NOW SEEK YOUR PERMISSION TO HAVE YOU STAND AS THE NEXT-OF-KIN TO LATE ENGR. JOHNSON CREEK SO THAT THE FUNDS US$21.5M WOULD BE RELEASED AND PAID INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AS THE BENEFICIARY NEXT-OF-KIN, ALL DOCUMENTS AND PROVES TO ENABLE YOU GET THIS FUND WILL BE CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND MORESO WE ARE ASSURING YOU OF 100% RISK FREE INVOLVEMENT, YOUR SHARE STAYS WHILE THE REST WILL BE FOR MY SELF AND MY COLLEAGUE FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSE IN YOUR COUNTRY. WE HAVE AGREED THAT THE FUNDS WILL BE SHARED THUS. AFTER IT HAS BEEN TRANSFERED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT. 1. 20% FOR YOU FOR ACTING AS THE BENEFICIARY OF THE FUNDS. 2. 5% WILL BE SET ASIDE FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO BOTH PARTIES FOR ANY INCIDENTAL EXPENSES THAT MAY BE INCURRED IN THE COURSE OF THE TRANSFER, (TELEPHONE AND FAX BILLS) 3. 75% FOR US THE ORIGINATORS OF THE TRANSACTION. IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ALRIGHT BY YOU, THEN KINDLY GET TO ME IMMEDIATELY VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS jormande9@netscape.net (ONLY) AND FURNISH ME WITH YOUR MOST CONFIDENTIAL TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS AND EXCLUSIVE BANK PARTICULARS SO THAT I CAN USE THESE INFORMATIONS TO APPLY FOR THE RELEASE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER OF THE FUNDS IN YOUR FAVOUR. THANKING YOU IN ANTICIPATION OF YOUR CO-OPERATION. YOURS FAITHFULLY. MR. JONATHAN MANDE From eric at cirr.com Fri Nov 15 11:50:36 2002 From: eric at cirr.com (Eric Schnoebelen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Nindy problems with MX1800 and MX2000 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:29:02 EST." Message-ID: <200211151750.gAFHoao24533@egsner.cirr.com> "Bob Bradlee" writes: - I don't care about the existing config, so I pop the box open, - set the jumper, switched to 56k and powered up forcing a Nindy. - - Got the Nindy banner and prompt => as expected but then it just - sits ignoring all Input. :( Sounds like a flow control problem. What are the settings on the laptop? (I seem to remember having to use no flow control the last time I nindy'd an 1800, but that's been a while.) -- Eric Schnoebelen eric@cirr.com http://www.cirr.com I'm just working here until a good fast-food job opens up. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From info at qualitek.net Fri Nov 15 11:55:42 2002 From: info at qualitek.net (Qualitek) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Lucent pre-Christmas Sale! In-Reply-To: <200211150905.28937@-mixdown.ca> Message-ID: For Sale: 5- APX8-SL-96DSP, $1200ea. 2- TNT-SL-CE1, $1150ea. 3- TNT-H, 672 port 96DSP, v.92, T3, $16,000ea. We have any configuration of Max TNT's and APX's available so let us quote your future today! Regards, Sean Bennett, Qualitek Services, Inc. www.Qualitek.Net 2215 Ringwood Ave. San Jose, CA 95131 PH: 408.597.0130 FX: 408.597.0131 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Bob at Bradlee.org Fri Nov 15 13:56:54 2002 From: Bob at Bradlee.org (Bob Bradlee) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Nindy problems with MX1800 and MX2000 In-Reply-To: <200211151750.gAFHoao24533@egsner.cirr.com> Message-ID: For Nindy I am using: 57600 8-n-1 np Both None and Hardware handshaking locks up the same. For Normal Login I am using: 9600 8-N-1 None and it works just fine, except no password on one box no Download option on the other. I am begining to think about using a chain saw :) Back to my Rat Killen ...... Bob On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:50:36 -0600, Eric Schnoebelen wrote: > >"Bob Bradlee" writes: >- I don't care about the existing config, so I pop the box open, >- set the jumper, switched to 56k and powered up forcing a Nindy. >- >- Got the Nindy banner and prompt => as expected but then it just >- sits ignoring all Input. :( > > Sounds like a flow control problem. What are the >settings on the laptop? (I seem to remember having to use no >flow control the last time I nindy'd an 1800, but that's been a >while.) > >-- >Eric Schnoebelen eric@cirr.com http://www.cirr.com > I'm just working here until a good fast-food job opens up. >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com >Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Fri Nov 15 14:05:57 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Nindy problems with MX1800 and MX2000 Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3AD@trinidad.solunet.com> Don't know what exact procedure you are using to Nindy, but here is the one I have. Maybe you are doing something different? Max 1800 ? With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the case and orient the LEDs toward you (the front). ? Locate P5 and short it. ? On the S interface box it is next to the battery. ? On the U interface it is located at the top center of the box next to the ribbon cable. ? Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no flow-control ? At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. It should be around 900k. Down load the software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. ? Power down the unit then remove the jumper from P5 and put the cover back on ? Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, or use the configurator. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Max 2000 ? With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the case and orient the LEDs toward you (the front). ? Locate P10 and short it. It is located in the front right corner of the motherboard next to a ribbon cable. ? Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no flow-control ? At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. Down load the software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. ? Power down the unit, remove the jumper from P10 and put the cover back on ? Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, or use the configurator. After this, I can't really say much more about it. I've done a few 6K/3K's, TNT's, and Pipes, but nothing THAT old ;-) - David -----Original Message----- From: Bob Bradlee [mailto:Bob@Bradlee.org] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:29 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Nindy problems with MX1800 and MX2000 I have several BRI lines coming into the house feeding an MAX1800, it has come to the point where I need to upgrade the MAX as it no longer handshakes with the MAX4004 on the other end. I am not sure what happened but they tell me I need to upgrade the MX1800 from 4.6cp8 something 6.x or later, I chose to use 7.0.28. Piece of Cake, I grabbed a laptop, connected up and and much to my dismay CtL'D does not give me Download as an option ? I don't care about the existing config, so I pop the box open, set the jumper, switched to 56k and powered up forcing a Nindy. Got the Nindy banner and prompt => as expected but then it just sits ignoring all Input. :( I refuse to be slowed down, so I run over to the shop and grab a MX2000 that I robbed the 56k cards from last year, and an 8BRIT card and head home with a big smile on my face. To make a long story short, it turns out the MX2000 was "scraped" and written off the books well over a year ago and the "Password" is now lost. So I pop the top, plug the jumper, start Nindy and it responds just like the MX1800 just sitting there ignoring all input. Thinking my laptop was getting even with me for my ignoring it, , I grabbed a Pipeline 75, poped the cover, and Nindyed sucessfully. A second try with both the 1800 and 2000, produced no joy. I did a second P85 which is now holding one line up untill I get the 1800 or 2000/8brit working. I plan on picking up a second bare MX2000 later this afternoon. That way I have a spare to destroy, if I reach "that magic point", this weekend :( I hope someone can point out what I am overlooking ! It has been several years since I kicked this sleeping dog, I should not be supprised that I got bit :) Thanks in advance, Bob ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Bob at Bradlee.org Fri Nov 15 15:27:37 2002 From: Bob at Bradlee.org (Bob Bradlee) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Nindy problem solved Message-ID: Thanks All I got the nindy process working, now to find the "best" load :) Ended up changing laptops :) Thanks again. Bob ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From naminda at sltnet.lk Fri Nov 15 23:12:38 2002 From: naminda at sltnet.lk (naminda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX TNT DIsconnect code 185 Message-ID: I am Naminda one engineerfrom Sri Lanka Telecom Internet Service http://www.sltnet.lk (the largest ISP in SRI Lnaka).I refer to problem with MAX TNT about disconnection.I saw your problem in Acend mail archieve.Do you have the same disconnection problems with other routers like cisco? Actually we have the same problem of disconnecting(disconnecting from code 185).Lot of our customers complain about this.WHat is the solution given by Acend to your problem? As per ascend it is due to many reason like retrain errors.Anyone can help me resolve the problem. Thanks Naminda E/NWII TP: 94-1-386670 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From oystein at homelien.no Sun Nov 17 12:42:14 2002 From: oystein at homelien.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Homelien?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporarily Message-ID: Anyone had problems with something like that? We have several TNTs that we see the same type of problem on. Every once in a while, typically several times per day, hdlc2ec cards will hang. We discovered this the following way: telnet to tnt log in open 1 x -- open a hdlc2ec card hdlc -p -- start displaying statistics of hdlc controllers The hdlc -p command typically prints out one line every second or so. We notice that the card hangs since suddenly it stops printing hdlc statistics every second. When this happens, the "open" connection to that particular card is dead/non-responsive. After 10-20-30-40 seconds, the card will come back up, in that the connection once again responds to commands and users connected through the card will have packets flowing to and from them again. While the card is hung, no ip/ppp traffic is forwarded to the users connected on that card at all (we see this by pinging a user on the card while this happens), but when the card comes back up everything works again (except typically some users have hung up because they do not expect 10-40 seconds of total packet loss during their dial-up session). Our TNTs are running 9.0.9, and as far as I can see this problem also exists in 9.0.4. We have no idea when this problem started happening, as we haven't found anything indicating what is happening in the logs, we just noticed that users sometimes experienced packet loss, and l2tp sessions timing out because of it. The most notable features we use are: * radius w/"call-check", auth and acct * stac * hdlc + modems * l2tp * multichassis mpp Anyone ever seen this, possible solutions? I am posting to the list because our local Lucent branch is being pretty much non-responsive to the problems we are having. They are simply not interested. Does Lucent care about its TNT customers who have invested heavily in these boxes? I'm starting to wonder, so this is a cry for help. Our customers certainly can't accept 30-second dead connections now and then, so unless we can get this TNT problem fixed, we are probably going to have to use the TNTs as doorstops and heaters, and go with Ciscos. It's just a pity that we actually believed in Ascend's promises back then when we had to choose between Cisco and Ascend for dialup equipment. -- Oystein Homelien, CVO | oystein@powertech.no PowerTech Information Systems AS | http://www.powertech.no/ Nedre Slottsgate 5, N-0157 OSLO | tel: +47-23-010-010, fax: +47-2220-0333 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From b.weeber at viastore.de Mon Nov 18 02:37:24 2002 From: b.weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Nindy problem solved In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <003401c28edd$b86a3540$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> Use 7.2.4. This is, AFAIK, the last release for MAX 1800. I'm using it myself on 8-BRI-S. No problems so far. Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Bob Bradlee > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:28 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Nindy problem solved > > > Thanks All > I got the nindy process working, now to find the "best" load :) > > Ended up changing laptops :) > > Thanks again. > Bob > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From naminda at sltnet.lk Mon Nov 18 04:43:42 2002 From: naminda at sltnet.lk (naminda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX TNT DIsconnect code 185 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Thanks paul, It is 31 & 60. 31= the modem is waiting DCD 60= The LAN session UP For you reference Please find the part of log file. Oct 23 12:22:25 203.115.1.186 1/17: [1/2/2/18] Call Disconnected [MBID 252; ->150] Oct 23 12:22:25 203.115.1.186 1/17: [1/7/24/0] Call Terminated [MBID 252; ->150] Oct 23 12:22:25 203.115.1.186 1/7: [1/7/24/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause 185.; progress 31.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 252; ->150] [Answer] Oct 23 12:39:35 203.115.1.186 1/17: [1/2/4/22] Call Disconnected [MBID 2267; 1651221->150] Oct 23 12:39:35 203.115.1.186 1/7: [1/7/3/0] STOP: 'dumindamalan'; cause 185.; progress 60.; host 203.94.88.185 [MBID 2267; 1651221->150] [dumindamalan] Thanks Naminda -----Original Message----- From: Robinson, Paul (Paul) [mailto:pr6@lucent.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:39 AM To: 'naminda@sltnet.lk' Subject: RE: (ASCEND) MAX TNT DIsconnect code 185 What are the disconnect/progress codes exactly Naminda? 185's are not necessarily bad. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: naminda [mailto:naminda@sltnet.lk] > Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002 4:13 PM > To: Rte-Ascend-Admin; Ascend-Users > Subject: (ASCEND) MAX TNT DIsconnect code 185 > > > > I am Naminda one engineerfrom Sri Lanka Telecom Internet Service > http://www.sltnet.lk (the largest ISP in SRI Lnaka).I refer to > problem with MAX TNT about disconnection.I saw your problem > in Acend mail > archieve.Do you have the same disconnection problems with > other routers like > cisco? > Actually we have the same problem of > disconnecting(disconnecting from code > 185).Lot of our customers complain about this.WHat is the > solution given by > Acend to your problem? > As per ascend it is due to many reason like retrain > errors.Anyone can help > me resolve the problem. > > > Thanks > > Naminda > E/NWII > TP: 94-1-386670 > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 18 14:52:48 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporar ily Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3BA@trinidad.solunet.com> Wow! That's interesting. I've never seen your exact situation but I've sure seen some modules do strange things...even caused by the shelf-controller (especially under heavy load doing multishelf) Have you done the old swap slot/card/chassis thing? When you say hang, do see the hdlc2ec bouncing? (down, reset, load, boot, post). How about your fatal-history log or syslog info? It's hard to believe that there is NOTHING in these logs after what you have described happens. Does it happen only when you are in the card (open n n )? Again, debugging on a heavily loaded multishelf set doing tunneling may have made the SCM burp on you, etc. Of course, if this happens even when the slot is closed and no debugging is on, that'd be a null issue. Are you running 9.0.9 for a specific reason or can you downgrade to 9.0.6? It's nice when you ask a bunch of questions and get even more back, eh? Just probin'. - David -----Original Message----- From: ?ystein Homelien [mailto:oystein@homelien.no] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:42 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporarily Anyone had problems with something like that? We have several TNTs that we see the same type of problem on. Every once in a while, typically several times per day, hdlc2ec cards will hang. We discovered this the following way: telnet to tnt log in open 1 x -- open a hdlc2ec card hdlc -p -- start displaying statistics of hdlc controllers The hdlc -p command typically prints out one line every second or so. We notice that the card hangs since suddenly it stops printing hdlc statistics every second. When this happens, the "open" connection to that particular card is dead/non-responsive. After 10-20-30-40 seconds, the card will come back up, in that the connection once again responds to commands and users connected through the card will have packets flowing to and from them again. While the card is hung, no ip/ppp traffic is forwarded to the users connected on that card at all (we see this by pinging a user on the card while this happens), but when the card comes back up everything works again (except typically some users have hung up because they do not expect 10-40 seconds of total packet loss during their dial-up session). Our TNTs are running 9.0.9, and as far as I can see this problem also exists in 9.0.4. We have no idea when this problem started happening, as we haven't found anything indicating what is happening in the logs, we just noticed that users sometimes experienced packet loss, and l2tp sessions timing out because of it. The most notable features we use are: * radius w/"call-check", auth and acct * stac * hdlc + modems * l2tp * multichassis mpp Anyone ever seen this, possible solutions? I am posting to the list because our local Lucent branch is being pretty much non-responsive to the problems we are having. They are simply not interested. Does Lucent care about its TNT customers who have invested heavily in these boxes? I'm starting to wonder, so this is a cry for help. Our customers certainly can't accept 30-second dead connections now and then, so unless we can get this TNT problem fixed, we are probably going to have to use the TNTs as doorstops and heaters, and go with Ciscos. It's just a pity that we actually believed in Ascend's promises back then when we had to choose between Cisco and Ascend for dialup equipment. -- Oystein Homelien, CVO | oystein@powertech.no PowerTech Information Systems AS | http://www.powertech.no/ Nedre Slottsgate 5, N-0157 OSLO | tel: +47-23-010-010, fax: +47-2220-0333 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 18 15:43:51 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporar ily Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3BB@trinidad.solunet.com> It looks like if they don't, it may take some time to figure this one out or start reducing the multiloading of the SCM... assuming a primary is managing 2 other TNT's. I suggest the 9.0.6 since you said that 9.0.9 was what you're using and 9.0.4 didn't do it for you either. Sometimes, a bug fix addressing some issues can cause a cascade of other issues to either resolve or appear. 9.0.6 , IMHO, is a stable code and is patched for the SNMP vulnerability. So, that is the one that made sense to me. If that doesn't work and you still want to approach the TAOS issue, you can always try 9.1.5. I believe Lucent will give that to you free if you can prove you need it for a possible bug fix. It might give you some in-roads to them helping you figure out the problem if they have to give you something free if they don't help you. ;-) Just out of curiosity, do you have more than 1 multishelf setup? Also, Lucent will likely tell you that they do not support multishelf anymore (in fact, 9.1.x might not even support it! - better double check on that). They may even tell you that your issues are the reason, in part, that multishelf is "no longer supported". Who knows? It's worth a try. - David -----Original Message----- From: ?ystein Homelien [mailto:oystein@homelien.no] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:05 PM To: DPascarella@solunet.com Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporar ily On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 DPascarella@solunet.com wrote: > Have you done the old swap slot/card/chassis thing? When you say hang, do Yes, and the problem persists across all the TNTs have, so I guess this must be fixable somehow since it is not a one-box issue. > see the hdlc2ec bouncing? (down, reset, load, boot, post). How about your No, it does not bounce. uptime -a shows long uptime, etc. > fatal-history log or syslog info? It's hard to believe that there is Nothing. > NOTHING in these logs after what you have described happens. Does it happen > only when you are in the card (open n n )? Again, debugging on a heavily Both when I am on the card and when I am not. > loaded multishelf set doing tunneling may have made the SCM burp on you, > etc. Of course, if this happens even when the slot is closed and no > debugging is on, that'd be a null issue. Are you running 9.0.9 for a > specific reason or can you downgrade to 9.0.6? We are running 9.0.9 because we always have various small issues that we would like to fix (bad connects, tnts need to be rebooted every week or they start refusing more and more isdn calls per hour, etc.). So we try to keep running the newest bugfixes if there is an indication that something we need to fix has been fixed in the release notes. Is there anything specific about 9.0.6 that would make it a good release to test? As I said, we have also tested with 9.0.4 (that we ran previously, without having this problem) but the problem still persists. I am not sure when the problem started appearing, since as you see uptime and logs show nothing about the problem. We just discovered it because customers complained about packet loss, and then we started debugging more closely. Thanks for your reply though :-) I had hoped that a Lucent employee would spot us and start taking care of this, though... > > It's nice when you ask a bunch of questions and get even more back, eh? > > Just probin'. > > - David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ?ystein Homelien [mailto:oystein@homelien.no] > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:42 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ > temporarily > > > Anyone had problems with something like that? We have several TNTs that > we see the same type of problem on. Every once in a while, typically > several times per day, hdlc2ec cards will hang. We discovered this the > following way: > > telnet to tnt > log in > open 1 x -- open a hdlc2ec card > hdlc -p -- start displaying statistics of hdlc controllers > > The hdlc -p command typically prints out one line every second or so. > We notice that the card hangs since suddenly it stops printing hdlc > statistics every second. When this happens, the "open" connection to that > particular card is dead/non-responsive. After 10-20-30-40 seconds, the > card will come back up, in that the connection once again responds to > commands and users connected through the card will have packets flowing to > and from them again. While the card is hung, no ip/ppp traffic is > forwarded to the users connected on that card at all (we see this by > pinging a user on the card while this happens), but when the card comes > back up everything works again (except typically some users have hung up > because they do not expect 10-40 seconds of total packet loss during their > dial-up session). > > Our TNTs are running 9.0.9, and as far as I can see this problem also > exists in 9.0.4. We have no idea when this problem started happening, as > we haven't found anything indicating what is happening in the logs, we > just noticed that users sometimes experienced packet loss, and l2tp > sessions timing out because of it. > > The most notable features we use are: > > * radius w/"call-check", auth and acct > * stac > * hdlc + modems > * l2tp > * multichassis mpp > > Anyone ever seen this, possible solutions? > > I am posting to the list because our local Lucent branch is being pretty > much non-responsive to the problems we are having. They are simply not > interested. Does Lucent care about its TNT customers who have invested > heavily in these boxes? I'm starting to wonder, so this is a cry for > help. > > Our customers certainly can't accept 30-second dead connections now and > then, so unless we can get this TNT problem fixed, we are probably going > to have to use the TNTs as doorstops and heaters, and go with Ciscos. > It's just a pity that we actually believed in Ascend's promises back then > when we had to choose between Cisco and Ascend for dialup equipment. > > -- Oystein Homelien, CVO | oystein@powertech.no PowerTech Information Systems AS | http://www.powertech.no/ Nedre Slottsgate 5, N-0157 OSLO | tel: +47-23-010-010, fax: +47-2220-0333 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From oystein at homelien.no Mon Nov 18 16:21:44 2002 From: oystein at homelien.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Homelien?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporar ily In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3BB@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 DPascarella@solunet.com wrote: > It looks like if they don't, it may take some time to figure this one out or > start reducing the multiloading of the SCM... assuming a primary is managing > 2 other TNT's. I suggest the 9.0.6 since you said that 9.0.9 was what I might have been vague; I mentioned multichassis multilink PPP ("stacking" in TNT terminology), but we are _not_ running multishelf. > or appear. 9.0.6 , IMHO, is a stable code and is patched for the SNMP > vulnerability. So, that is the one that made sense to me. If that doesn't > work and you still want to approach the TAOS issue, you can always try > 9.1.5. I believe Lucent will give that to you free if you can prove you > need it for a possible bug fix. It might give you some in-roads to them > helping you figure out the problem if they have to give you something free > if they don't help you. ;-) In light of your recommendation I am going to test 9.0.6, but I'd like to get started on getting access to the 9.1.5 image right away. Do you have any idea where I might go to assert my need for such a deal? I'm looking for a person with a name and a direct phone number, if possible -- we are getting absolutely nowhere with Lucent locally. -- Oystein Homelien, CVO | oystein@powertech.no PowerTech Information Systems AS | http://www.powertech.no/ Nedre Slottsgate 5, N-0157 OSLO | tel: +47-23-010-010, fax: +47-2220-0333 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From oystein at homelien.no Mon Nov 18 15:05:02 2002 From: oystein at homelien.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Homelien?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ temporar ily In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3BA@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 DPascarella@solunet.com wrote: > Have you done the old swap slot/card/chassis thing? When you say hang, do Yes, and the problem persists across all the TNTs have, so I guess this must be fixable somehow since it is not a one-box issue. > see the hdlc2ec bouncing? (down, reset, load, boot, post). How about your No, it does not bounce. uptime -a shows long uptime, etc. > fatal-history log or syslog info? It's hard to believe that there is Nothing. > NOTHING in these logs after what you have described happens. Does it happen > only when you are in the card (open n n )? Again, debugging on a heavily Both when I am on the card and when I am not. > loaded multishelf set doing tunneling may have made the SCM burp on you, > etc. Of course, if this happens even when the slot is closed and no > debugging is on, that'd be a null issue. Are you running 9.0.9 for a > specific reason or can you downgrade to 9.0.6? We are running 9.0.9 because we always have various small issues that we would like to fix (bad connects, tnts need to be rebooted every week or they start refusing more and more isdn calls per hour, etc.). So we try to keep running the newest bugfixes if there is an indication that something we need to fix has been fixed in the release notes. Is there anything specific about 9.0.6 that would make it a good release to test? As I said, we have also tested with 9.0.4 (that we ran previously, without having this problem) but the problem still persists. I am not sure when the problem started appearing, since as you see uptime and logs show nothing about the problem. We just discovered it because customers complained about packet loss, and then we started debugging more closely. Thanks for your reply though :-) I had hoped that a Lucent employee would spot us and start taking care of this, though... > > It's nice when you ask a bunch of questions and get even more back, eh? > > Just probin'. > > - David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ?ystein Homelien [mailto:oystein@homelien.no] > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:42 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ascend tnt hdlc2ec cards _hanging_ > temporarily > > > Anyone had problems with something like that? We have several TNTs that > we see the same type of problem on. Every once in a while, typically > several times per day, hdlc2ec cards will hang. We discovered this the > following way: > > telnet to tnt > log in > open 1 x -- open a hdlc2ec card > hdlc -p -- start displaying statistics of hdlc controllers > > The hdlc -p command typically prints out one line every second or so. > We notice that the card hangs since suddenly it stops printing hdlc > statistics every second. When this happens, the "open" connection to that > particular card is dead/non-responsive. After 10-20-30-40 seconds, the > card will come back up, in that the connection once again responds to > commands and users connected through the card will have packets flowing to > and from them again. While the card is hung, no ip/ppp traffic is > forwarded to the users connected on that card at all (we see this by > pinging a user on the card while this happens), but when the card comes > back up everything works again (except typically some users have hung up > because they do not expect 10-40 seconds of total packet loss during their > dial-up session). > > Our TNTs are running 9.0.9, and as far as I can see this problem also > exists in 9.0.4. We have no idea when this problem started happening, as > we haven't found anything indicating what is happening in the logs, we > just noticed that users sometimes experienced packet loss, and l2tp > sessions timing out because of it. > > The most notable features we use are: > > * radius w/"call-check", auth and acct > * stac > * hdlc + modems > * l2tp > * multichassis mpp > > Anyone ever seen this, possible solutions? > > I am posting to the list because our local Lucent branch is being pretty > much non-responsive to the problems we are having. They are simply not > interested. Does Lucent care about its TNT customers who have invested > heavily in these boxes? I'm starting to wonder, so this is a cry for > help. > > Our customers certainly can't accept 30-second dead connections now and > then, so unless we can get this TNT problem fixed, we are probably going > to have to use the TNTs as doorstops and heaters, and go with Ciscos. > It's just a pity that we actually believed in Ascend's promises back then > when we had to choose between Cisco and Ascend for dialup equipment. > > -- Oystein Homelien, CVO | oystein@powertech.no PowerTech Information Systems AS | http://www.powertech.no/ Nedre Slottsgate 5, N-0157 OSLO | tel: +47-23-010-010, fax: +47-2220-0333 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ashleyriker at adelphia.net Tue Nov 19 09:09:33 2002 From: ashleyriker at adelphia.net (ashleyriker) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) supermodels exposed Message-ID: <200211191506.HAA22116@max.bungi.com> Hi Im lilia and im looking for some new friends to chat and trade pics. Do you have any pics to trade? U can see me at my homepage @ http://barbiedollteens.com/liliashomepage.html to find out how we can trade pics & add you to my MSN Messenger. If you dont appreciate me emailing you to try and make new friends Please email me @ luvsikgirl@hotmail.com and cut and paste "Leave Me Alone" in subject line of email and i will NEVER SEND YOU AN EMAIL AGAIN ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jeff at cetlink.net Tue Nov 19 10:03:14 2002 From: jeff at cetlink.net (Jeffrey Wheat) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hardware versions on MAX TXT Message-ID: <32EEB28BC317EE4AB4A00685BA7266A3D7F416@webacct.nt.cetlink.net> Does anyone know how I can get the exact hardware/firmware versions of all the cards or at the least, the madd cards in my TNT? All the card shows on the tag is TNT-SL-ADI-C. Is this a P or a V card? I'm trying to determine this. I am running TAOS 10.0.0. Please reply directly. Many thanks, Jeff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tigr at oskom.ru Wed Nov 20 07:19:50 2002 From: tigr at oskom.ru (Alex) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX6000 troubles... Message-ID: <3DDB8BF6.7010807@oskom.ru> Hello All! At me is MAX6000 with four dsp cards. When the amount of the users simultaneously working, does not exceed 100 all well but when it more than 100, in syslog periodically is written to me the following message: Nov 20 10:48:11 as1 ASCEND: slot 4 port 14, Invalid mdm con str [MBID 382;? - > 1112] thus the user normally can not incorporate, and during 3-5 seconds hears silence, and only then begins handshake, but after that he can not enter username the password, only sees the invitation to input and all. Whether who collided be with a similar problem? Very much I hope for your help as for me this problem began to have an effect for amount of clients. On MAX it is installed TAOS 9.0.9 Thanks. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pedro at intersat-telecom.ro Wed Nov 20 06:56:15 2002 From: pedro at intersat-telecom.ro (Petrisor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max6000 problems... Message-ID: <008001c29094$398e93c0$3a74a8c0@connex.ro> Hy, I have a MAX6000 with one DSP card with 16 ports.My TAOS is +9.0.4 My problem is: -on Ethernet=>Mod_Config=>VOIP_option i don't have the option FAST START. In the manual of Max 6000 they describe this option,but i don't have it. Please help me, Best Regars, Pedro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021120/2b80b90c/attachment.html From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Nov 20 10:45:26 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hardware versions on MAX TXT Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3E5@trinidad.solunet.com> Sorry... You can also open the slot and do a "slotattrib". Gives you a whole lot more of info. EX: open 1 1 madd2-1/1>slotatt Hope this helps, - David -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Wheat [mailto:jeff@cetlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:03 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hardware versions on MAX TXT Does anyone know how I can get the exact hardware/firmware versions of all the cards or at the least, the madd cards in my TNT? All the card shows on the tag is TNT-SL-ADI-C. Is this a P or a V card? I'm trying to determine this. I am running TAOS 10.0.0. Please reply directly. Many thanks, Jeff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Nov 20 10:42:23 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hardware versions on MAX TXT Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B3E4@trinidad.solunet.com> admin>get slot-info {1 1 0} to get the info in slot 1. -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Wheat [mailto:jeff@cetlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:03 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Hardware versions on MAX TXT Does anyone know how I can get the exact hardware/firmware versions of all the cards or at the least, the madd cards in my TNT? All the card shows on the tag is TNT-SL-ADI-C. Is this a P or a V card? I'm trying to determine this. I am running TAOS 10.0.0. Please reply directly. Many thanks, Jeff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Wed Nov 20 13:24:39 2002 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Message-ID: Hi all, I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me first start with what I had. 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards to using a channelized DS3 card. My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a modem to answer the call. Before completing modem negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from the user's computer modem, probably because the modems had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility between the modems. These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot on my head from banging it on the wall. Thanks. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From netlink at netlinkcorp.com Wed Nov 20 13:56:15 2002 From: netlink at netlinkcorp.com (NET-LINK) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Max 6000 and CHT1 Message-ID: <200211201356.AA98631960@netlinkcorp.com> Hello list, I know this has been discussed here and as usual at the time never had the problem until recently. Max 6096, TAOS 9.0, CHT1, D4 AMI, Clocking = Yes Modem rings in attempts hardware handshake and then drops connection. After 1 or 2 calls the line busies out. Initial tone is what I would expect then handshake attempts with either retrain or dull low tone and drops connection. I don't believe this is the High Pitched Tone, Max 6000 and CHT1 problem but thought I would ask again what helps that problem. The CHT1 is going through some testing as we speak which is where I think the problem is but looking for some other options as well. Thanks. ------- R. Hall NET-LINK Corp. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From brian at net-port.com Wed Nov 20 15:41:23 2002 From: brian at net-port.com (Brian Goodenow) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) radius auth Message-ID: <002d01c290dd$9255e4b0$0c941544@blg> HELP! ? I?m using a MAXTNT and in the process of a system IP change.? I think changing the IP on my secondary radius server caused problems for the TNT.? It will work fine for a bit, then all incoming connections will start getting a ?radius timeout for user username?.? On the TNT I did read external auth, and I can see where the radius servers are listed but cannot figure out the command to change them. ? Thank you in advance! ? Brian Goodenow Net-port ISP 110 N. Michigan Ave Big Rapids MI 49307 Ph. 231.592.9877? x 204 Fax. 208-975-7515 www.net-port.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From interscan at hhsdc.ca.gov Wed Nov 20 17:55:22 2002 From: interscan at hhsdc.ca.gov (interscan@hhsdc.ca.gov) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) InterScan NT Alert Message-ID: InterScan has detected a virus in an e-mail attachment that you sent. Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:55:22 -0800 Method: Mail From: To: WebMaster@email.abc.ca.gov File: width.bat Action: clean failed - deleted Virus: WORM_KLEZ.H ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From sales at qualitek.net Wed Nov 20 20:09:07 2002 From: sales at qualitek.net (Qualitek Services, Inc.) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT-SL-E100ND-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: For sale: 4x TNT-SL-E100ND-C, $3600ea obo. Never put into service and come with our 120 day replacement guaranty. Regards, Sean Bennett, Qualitek Services, Inc. www.Qualitek.Net 2215 Ringwood Ave. San Jose, CA 95131 PH: 408.597.0130 FX: 408.597.0131 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From HKruell at swd-ag.de Thu Nov 21 01:44:09 2002 From: HKruell at swd-ag.de (HKruell@swd-ag.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) radius auth Message-ID: Hello, login read external-auth (to read the profile) list (to see the main profile) list rad-auth-client (to see the settings for the radius-client) set auth-server-x = ipaddress (to set the radius-servers address x=1 for first x=2 for second) write (to write and activate your changes) quit good luck Heribert Kruell RemoteAccessAdministration Stadtwerke Duesseldorf AG Germany ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ats_52 at yahoo.com Thu Nov 21 04:01:06 2002 From: ats_52 at yahoo.com (achiko tskhvariashvili) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <20021121100106.53159.qmail@web21302.mail.yahoo.com> can you send me a thorough information about how the R1,5 signaling works in digital switching systems? thank you in advance __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From gehres at datasync.com Thu Nov 21 15:56:17 2002 From: gehres at datasync.com (Mark Gehres) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 Message-ID: <200211211556.17214.gehres@datasync.com> We have bought some used MAX 4000 and 6000 boxes but do not have passwords. I need info on how to nindy them and where to find the restricted software files we need to upload to them. Thanks, -- Mark Gehres <>< Datasync/I-55 # gehres@datasync.com # gehres@i-55.com # www.datasync.com Phone: (228) 435-8888 x-2119 # Fax: (228) 435-4388 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From faisal at hamdard.net.pk Thu Nov 21 23:39:39 2002 From: faisal at hamdard.net.pk (Faisal S. Naik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT config-commands Message-ID: <00d001c291e9$8ce04270$082d85ca@SNE2> Hello All, I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to check this or do i need to enable some debug? 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to redirect all port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? TIA Regards, ----------- Faisal ?. Naik Karachi. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 11/20/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Nov 22 05:56:46 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands In-Reply-To: <00d001c291e9$8ce04270$082d85ca@SNE2> Message-ID: <000801c2921e$3ff39f40$562efea9@psknet.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Faisal S. Naik > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:40 AM > To: Ascend-users > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > Hello All, > I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all > incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to > check this or > do i need to enable some debug? > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection attempts, you'll need to set external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. > 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to > display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. Log/syslog-level = critical If you have an SNMP server, you can enable trap messages, which should be more efficient than scanning syslog for such issues. > > And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to > redirect all > port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server address. I would recommend either setting your proxy server between the TNT and border router, or do the redirect on the border router itself (there's a sample configuration in the Squid FAQ and/or manual (which would apply even if you're not using squid). > > TIA > > Regards, > ----------- > Faisal ?. Naik > Karachi. I hope this helps, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From faisal at hamdard.net.pk Wed Nov 20 16:18:04 2002 From: faisal at hamdard.net.pk (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Faisal_=A7._Naik?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands References: <000801c2921e$3ff39f40$562efea9@psknet.com> Message-ID: <005d01c290e2$b36bf2c0$f02e85ca@faisal> Thanks for the replies Troy.. I'll check these out soon. The reason i am moving away from the idea of redirecting the traffic on router is the high CPU utilization factor of the router. I am already running such a setup. Anywya.. lets see wht can be doen with the TNT Thanks once again ----- Original Message ----- From: "Troy Settle" To: "'Faisal S. Naik'" ; "'Ascend-users'" Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Faisal S. Naik > > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:40 AM > > To: Ascend-users > > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > > > > Hello All, > > I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all > > incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to > > check this or > > do i need to enable some debug? > > > > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've > set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from > which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect > causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection > attempts, you'll need to set > external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. > > > > 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to > > display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. > > Log/syslog-level = critical > > If you have an SNMP server, you can enable trap messages, which should > be more efficient than scanning syslog for such issues. > > > > > And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to > > redirect all > > port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? > > I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know > that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except > your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to > this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server > address. > > I would recommend either setting your proxy server between the TNT and > border router, or do the redirect on the border router itself (there's a > sample configuration in the Squid FAQ and/or manual (which would apply > even if you're not using squid). > > > > > TIA > > > > Regards, > > ----------- > > Faisal ?. Naik > > Karachi. > > I hope this helps, > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Nov 22 05:58:19 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 In-Reply-To: <200211211556.17214.gehres@datasync.com> Message-ID: <000901c2921e$73724ce0$562efea9@psknet.com> Don't you just love all those used equipment vendors out there? http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Mark Gehres > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Ascend-Users > Subject: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > We have bought some used MAX 4000 and 6000 boxes but do not > have passwords. I > need info on how to nindy them and where to find the > restricted software > files we need to upload to them. > > Thanks, > -- > Mark Gehres <>< > Datasync/I-55 # gehres@datasync.com # gehres@i-55.com # www.datasync.com Phone: (228) 435-8888 x-2119 # Fax: (228) 435-4388 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jescobar at ayustar.com Fri Nov 22 09:22:19 2002 From: jescobar at ayustar.com (Jose F. Escobar Machin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands In-Reply-To: <005d01c290e2$b36bf2c0$f02e85ca@faisal> Message-ID: Faisal: Do you know what WCCP is? That doesn't consume much CPU on the router because it doesn't scan all traffic to look for port 80, it just redirects all port 80 requests on the Serials to X numbers of cache you have running with WCCP. I have it that way and it works perfect. If you want you can email me and I'll send you the configurations and modules that I have running. Jose F. Escobar Ayustar Corporation 787-440-3232 jescobar@ayustar.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Faisal ?. Naik Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:18 PM To: Troy Settle Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: Re: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands Importance: High Thanks for the replies Troy.. I'll check these out soon. The reason i am moving away from the idea of redirecting the traffic on router is the high CPU utilization factor of the router. I am already running such a setup. Anywya.. lets see wht can be doen with the TNT Thanks once again ----- Original Message ----- From: "Troy Settle" To: "'Faisal S. Naik'" ; "'Ascend-users'" Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Faisal S. Naik > > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:40 AM > > To: Ascend-users > > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > > > > Hello All, > > I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all > > incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to > > check this or > > do i need to enable some debug? > > > > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've > set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from > which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect > causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection > attempts, you'll need to set > external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. > > > > 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to > > display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. > > Log/syslog-level = critical > > If you have an SNMP server, you can enable trap messages, which should > be more efficient than scanning syslog for such issues. > > > > > And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to > > redirect all > > port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? > > I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know > that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except > your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to > this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server > address. > > I would recommend either setting your proxy server between the TNT and > border router, or do the redirect on the border router itself (there's a > sample configuration in the Squid FAQ and/or manual (which would apply > even if you're not using squid). > > > > > TIA > > > > Regards, > > ----------- > > Faisal ?. Naik > > Karachi. > > I hope this helps, > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From akohlsmith at benshaw.com Fri Nov 22 08:45:22 2002 From: akohlsmith at benshaw.com (Andrew Kohlsmith) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands In-Reply-To: <000801c2921e$3ff39f40$562efea9@psknet.com> References: <000801c2921e$3ff39f40$562efea9@psknet.com> Message-ID: <200211220945.22497@-mixdown.ca> > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've > set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from > which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect > causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection > attempts, you'll need to set > external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. What are the various RADIUS fields I can get from a MaxTNT? Better yet, where can I find such detailled documentation on the MaxTNT online? > I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know > that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except > your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to > this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server > address. Do the MaxTNT devices support WCCP? Regards, Andrew ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pedro at intersat-telecom.ro Fri Nov 22 09:26:09 2002 From: pedro at intersat-telecom.ro (Petrisor) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max6000 Message-ID: <007301c2923b$7c2dd760$3a74a8c0@connex.ro> Hy, I have a MAX6000 with one DSP card with 16 ports.My TAOS is +9.0.4 My problem is: -on Ethernet=>Mod_Config=>VOIP_option i don't have the option FAST START. In the manual of Max 6000 they describe this option,but i don't have it. Please help me, Best Regars, Pedro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20021122/f32d456a/attachment.htm From VRagozzino at nrtc.org Fri Nov 22 14:42:13 2002 From: VRagozzino at nrtc.org (Vincent Ragozzino) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Convert a Max 4000 into a 6000 Message-ID: <9366A6ACB518D511B54B0008C78609E002AEDF1C@exchange.nrtc.org> I see our 4048 has 4 T1 ports on the back of it and room for expansion cards to accomodate 96 modems. It is running ftik.m40 (7.0.28) and the software op[tion to configure slot 2 is there. It does not seem to allow the changes though, as soon as I save anything for slot 2 it simply reverts back to the original config... My question is... Can I load 6000 code on a 4000 box and enable those 2 extra T1 ports? Add some more modems and thus save me the cost of purchasing another chassis? Thanks in advance, Vincent From vbranyik at piopc.com Fri Nov 22 22:24:15 2002 From: vbranyik at piopc.com (Vilmos Branyik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 Message-ID: I've been reading these different Nindy docs on and off and am about to try it for the first time. In the documents it says to upload the firmware using xmodem but I've haven't seen a file name for the firmware mentioned. Would it be a .m40 file (for a Max 4000) like the ones on the FTP site or some other file. Vilmos Pioneer PC Associates www.piopc.net (719) 784-6955 -----Original Message----- From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:58 AM To: 'Mark Gehres'; 'Ascend-Users' Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 Don't you just love all those used equipment vendors out there? http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Mark Gehres > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Ascend-Users > Subject: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > We have bought some used MAX 4000 and 6000 boxes but do not > have passwords. I > need info on how to nindy them and where to find the > restricted software > files we need to upload to them. > > Thanks, > -- > Mark Gehres <>< > Datasync/I-55 # gehres@datasync.com # gehres@i-55.com # www.datasync.com Phone: (228) 435-8888 x-2119 # Fax: (228) 435-4388 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Jenniepu at curio-city.com Sat Nov 23 02:31:06 2002 From: Jenniepu at curio-city.com (Dionna Kloth) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Cure Employment Monotony ascend-users Message-ID: YOUR DEGREE MAY BE CLOSER THAN YOU THINK We remove the obstacles that cause adults to abandon hope. DID YOU KNOW that you could earn your legitimate Associate's, Bachelor's, Master's or even Doctorate degree, utilizing your already existing professional or academic expertise? Prepare for the professional advancement you deserve If you are an adult with a high school diploma and have a minimum of three years of experience in the field you are seeking a degree in, YOU QUALIFY. As you know, employers continually hire, promote and give raises to new employees that have ZERO skills or experience, just because they have that piece of paper. Take part in the wealth now! Within days you can apply for that unreachable job, or show your degree to your employer and demand the raise and promotion that your knowledge and skills deserve. How does this work? You graduate without attending classes, or taking a leave of absence from your current job. You receive you degree based on life and work experience! The degree earned by our students enables them to qualify for career advancement and personal growth, while breaking down the wall that prevents them from receiving big money. Degree verification and official transcripts will be provided in writing when requested by employers and others authorized by the graduate. Our college & University transcripts meet the highest academic standards. Our University issues a degree printed on premium diploma paper, bearing an official gold raised college seal. No one is turned down. Confidentiality assured. CALL 1-602-230-4252 Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including Sundays and holidays. To be taken off our list reply with off as the subject. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Nov 23 08:49:41 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000301c292ff$8ef1c400$562efea9@psknet.com> Vilmos, You need to use whichever firmware image suits your needs. Check out the upgrade-filenames.txt file for details on which image to use. On the 6000's, I'd recommend 9.0.9, on the 4000, it's 7.0.28. Because I offer 56k dialup and ISDN over T1/PRI, and I use OSPF on my network, I go with tik.m60 from 9.0.9 and ftik.m40 from 7.0.28. Both images have run wonderfully well for me when I was still using the smaller boxes. Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Vilmos Branyik > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:24 PM > To: 'ascend-users@max.bungi.com' > Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max > 4000 and 6000 > > > I've been reading these different Nindy docs on and off and > am about to try > it for the first time. In the documents it says to upload the > firmware using > xmodem but I've haven't seen a file name for the firmware mentioned. > > Would it be a .m40 file (for a Max 4000) like the ones on the > FTP site or > some other file. > > Vilmos > Pioneer PC Associates > www.piopc.net > (719) 784-6955 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:58 AM > To: 'Mark Gehres'; 'Ascend-Users' > Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > > Don't you just love all those used equipment vendors out there? > http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Mark Gehres > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Ascend-Users > Subject: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > We have bought some used MAX 4000 and 6000 boxes but do not > have passwords. I > need info on how to nindy them and where to find the > restricted software > files we need to upload to them. > > Thanks, > -- > Mark Gehres <>< > Datasync/I-55 # gehres@datasync.com # gehres@i-55.com # www.datasync.com Phone: (228) 435-8888 x-2119 # Fax: (228) 435-4388 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Nov 23 08:53:32 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MAX6000 troubles... In-Reply-To: <3DDB8BF6.7010807@oskom.ru> Message-ID: <000401c29300$1811fbb0$562efea9@psknet.com> Hi Alex, You say that you have 4 DSP cards, but you do not tell us what size they are. If they are the newer 24 port cards, then you only have room for 96 users. Once you reach this limit, your users will have nowhere to go. I assume that you have 4 E1 lines, which provides you with over 96 actual incoming lines. I would suggest that you make sure you have enough DSPs to cover all your incoming lines. Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Alex > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:20 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) MAX6000 troubles... > > > Hello All! > > At me is MAX6000 with four dsp cards. When the amount of the users > simultaneously working, does not exceed 100 all well but when it more > than 100, in syslog periodically is written to me the > following message: > > Nov 20 10:48:11 as1 ASCEND: slot 4 port 14, Invalid mdm con str [MBID > 382;? - > 1112] > > thus the user normally can not incorporate, and during 3-5 > seconds hears > silence, and only then begins handshake, but after that he > can not enter > username the password, only sees the invitation to input and all. > > Whether who collided be with a similar problem? Very much I hope for > your help as for me this problem began to have an effect for > amount of > clients. On MAX it is installed TAOS 9.0.9 > Thanks. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From adoadamu at netscape.net Sat Nov 23 11:23:24 2002 From: adoadamu at netscape.net (MISS ADO ADAMU) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE Message-ID: <200211231723.gANHNCq05295@enchanter.real-time.com> Hi, How are you doing, I am so happy to write you this mail, I was thinking of who I can really discuss my problems with, so I decided that I should write you, I am not the kind of person who would send something like this out to you unless I had actually thought of it, well I know that I am a very young girl compare to your age, but I choosed to write you, because I know that you can be able to give me good advise that you can also give to your child, in such I want you to take me as your daughter. My name is Ado Adamu and I am a 17 years old girl, I was a computer science student of the City Computer Technology, Lagos, Nigeria before I recently lost both parents to a ghastly motor accident, My dad is a Nigerian and my mum was from Ghana, I was born in Nigeria, but after the death of my parents, I started staying with my dad sister, that was when my problems started, my Aunty is not all that too educated, I can say she does not know the value of education, she has been trying to persuade me into prostitution, 3 of her daughters are prostituting in Europe, but I told her that I want to continue my studies, she frowned at all my plead to get money from her to resume school. I have not been able to pay for my school fees, and that has been my major problem since all this while, the cost of my school fees is N21,500 which is equilvanlent to $185, I have been begging her but to no avail, but she is still bent on persuading me to go into prostitution, I have been seeking for assistance here in Nigeria, but most people that I can reach are very poor, good education is what I need now and I just have to be begging to have it, my late parents always told me that if I dedicate my time and become well educated that I will become great, but I can now see it as something that I might never achieve, please give me your advise, I want to realise the dream that my parents had for me, the only resort now for me is to beg and please don't l > ook down on me for that reason, it is circumstance that lead me to this. please let me just ask this favor from you, I pray you willing be to help me, but it is never my intention to ask you for assistance to pay my school fees, but it is the time limit that I have to pay for my tuition that is bothering me, if I am able to raise the money for my school fees then I will go and resume school and also I want to leave my Aunty, I want to be staying the school dormitory and avoid my Aunty, please just take me as your daughter, if I had known any of my mums relative, they would have been the ones to help me out, considering the fact that I am not in any position to ask you for assistance, I will be most grateful if you can consider me as your daughter and help me in paying my tuition, if I am able to pay for my fees the school promised to give me free accomodation in the dormitory, please just do this for me, let that which you want to give to me be your own way of eradicating prostitution, I will be expecting your mail to know how you can help me. My regards to your family and may the good Lord continue to bless you, Amen. > Sincerely Yours > Ado Adamu > I sent an Angel to watch over you while you were asleep but the Angel came back earlier than I expected, and I asked the Angel why, and he said, Angels don't watch over Angels. > May you be an Angel to someone in need, Amen. > From justina49 at netscape.net Sat Nov 23 13:09:22 2002 From: justina49 at netscape.net (MRS.JUSTINA KABILA) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] URGENT ASSISTANCE Message-ID: <200211231909.gANJ98q04157@enchanter.real-time.com> STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL FROM: MRS. JUSTINA KABILA TEL: +31-613-865-048 E-MAIL: justina49@netscape.net ATTN: AN APPEAL FOR YOUR PERSONAL ASSISTANCE TO INVEST IN YOUR COUNTRY I AM FORTY-NINE YEARS OLD WIDOW (THE THIRD WIFE) OF THE LATE PRESIDENT LAURENT KABILA OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. MY HUSBAND WAS ASSASINATED BY ONE OF HIS BODYGUARD ON THE 16th OF JANUARY 2001. AT THE MID OF THE REBELLION WHICH IS STILL ON IN MY COUNTRY,MY SON AND I WENT OUT OF CONGO ACCORDING TO MY HUSBAND INSTRUCTION BEFORE HIS DEATH BECAUSE THE FAITH OF OUR COUNTRY WAS YET TO BE DECIDED. WE CAME TO AMSTERDAM WITH THREE SEALED BAGGAGE CONTAINING THE SUM OF TWENTY-TWO MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$22,000,000.00). ON ARRIVAL IN AMSTERDAM THE NETHERLANDS, WE SOUGHT FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM. WE WERE NOT ALLOWED TO OPERATE A BANK ACCOUNT AND DECIDED TO DEPOSIT THE SEALED BAGGAGES CONTAINING THE FUNDS WITH A PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANY.FOR SECURITY REASONS, I DECLARED THE CONTENT AS PHOTOGRAHPIC MATERIALS of high security value BELONGING TO MY FOREIGN AFFILIATED BUSINESS PARTNER. SINCE THEN WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR A RELIABLE AND TRUSTWORTHY PERSON TO HELP ME FOR SAFE KEEPING OF THE MONEY PRIOR TO INVESTING IN ANY CONDUCIVE COUNTRY IN OVERSEA. I GOT IN CONTACT WITH SOMEBODY IN AUSTRALIA,HE BECAME GREEDY CONSIDERING HIS SHARE IN THE TRANSACTION, HE ASKED FOR 40%. LUCKILY, I RAN INTO YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION AND DETAILS, AND DECIDE TO CONTACT YOU AND SEE IF YOU COULD BE OF ANY HELP TO ME AND THE TERMS OF THE TRANSACTION IS AS FOLLOWS: 1) 25% OF THE TOTAL SUM TO YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING ACCOUNT AND SAFE KEEPING OF THE FUNDS. 2) 5% OF THE TOTAL SUM WILL BE SET ASIDE FOR ANY EXPENSES THAT MAY BE INCURRED IN THE PROCESS OF THIS TRANSACTION. 3) 70% OF THE TOTAL SUM WILL BE FOR ME AND MY FAMILY INVESTMENT IN YOUR COUNTRY OF WHICH YOU WILL BE A GUIDE TO US. PLEASE SHOULD THIS MEET YOUR ULTMOST CONSIDERATION,CONTACT MY SON (PETER KABILA) THROUGH TELEPHONE:(+31-613-865-048) PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK (PETER) ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY CONSIDER NECESSARY, HE IS FRONTING FOR ME ;AS I LOOK FOWARD TO HEAR FROM YOU. YOURS TRULY, MRS. JUSTINA KABILA. From vbranyik at piopc.com Sat Nov 23 20:50:19 2002 From: vbranyik at piopc.com (Vilmos Branyik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 Message-ID: Troy, Thanks for the information. I (just by chance) had 7.0.28 on the first Max 4000 I got, so I have put it on all the others I've set up since. When I run this upgrade in the Nindy road, do I have to run the restricted load first and then reboot. Like when I upgrade using TFTP? Vilmos -----Original Message----- From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 7:50 AM To: 'Vilmos Branyik'; ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 Vilmos, You need to use whichever firmware image suits your needs. Check out the upgrade-filenames.txt file for details on which image to use. On the 6000's, I'd recommend 9.0.9, on the 4000, it's 7.0.28. Because I offer 56k dialup and ISDN over T1/PRI, and I use OSPF on my network, I go with tik.m60 from 9.0.9 and ftik.m40 from 7.0.28. Both images have run wonderfully well for me when I was still using the smaller boxes. Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Vilmos Branyik > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:24 PM > To: 'ascend-users@max.bungi.com' > Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max > 4000 and 6000 > > > I've been reading these different Nindy docs on and off and > am about to try > it for the first time. In the documents it says to upload the > firmware using > xmodem but I've haven't seen a file name for the firmware mentioned. > > Would it be a .m40 file (for a Max 4000) like the ones on the > FTP site or > some other file. > > Vilmos > Pioneer PC Associates > www.piopc.net > (719) 784-6955 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:58 AM > To: 'Mark Gehres'; 'Ascend-Users' > Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > > Don't you just love all those used equipment vendors out there? > http://www.google.com/search?q=ascend+nindy Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Mark Gehres > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Ascend-Users > Subject: (ASCEND) password recovery on Max 4000 and 6000 > > > We have bought some used MAX 4000 and 6000 boxes but do not > have passwords. I > need info on how to nindy them and where to find the > restricted software > files we need to upload to them. > > Thanks, > -- > Mark Gehres <>< > Datasync/I-55 # gehres@datasync.com # gehres@i-55.com # www.datasync.com Phone: (228) 435-8888 x-2119 # Fax: (228) 435-4388 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From naminda at sltnet.lk Sun Nov 24 21:20:20 2002 From: naminda at sltnet.lk (naminda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands In-Reply-To: <000801c2921e$3ff39f40$562efea9@psknet.com> Message-ID: I think what you need is For redirecting web traffic you can try the following.I extracted them from another chain-mail.You can try the folowing. in Maxtnt user connection profile admin>read conn any admin>list port-redirect admin>set protocol=tcp admin>set port-number=80 admin>set redirect-server=ip.address.of.proxy admin>wr This will cause user requests for port 80 to forward to your proxy server. In radius user profile Ascend-Port-Redir-Protocol=Ascend-Proto-TCP, Ascend-Port-Redir-Portnum=80, Ascend-Port-Redir-Server=ip.address.of.proxy Note that the proxy should be in the same subnet as of Maxtnt (I think) Hope this will help .... -----Original Message----- From: rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com [mailto:rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com]On Behalf Of Troy Settle Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM To: 'Faisal S. Naik'; 'Ascend-users' Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Faisal S. Naik > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:40 AM > To: Ascend-users > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > Hello All, > I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all > incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to > check this or > do i need to enable some debug? > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection attempts, you'll need to set external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. > 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to > display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. Log/syslog-level = critical If you have an SNMP server, you can enable trap messages, which should be more efficient than scanning syslog for such issues. > > And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to > redirect all > port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server address. I would recommend either setting your proxy server between the TNT and border router, or do the redirect on the border router itself (there's a sample configuration in the Squid FAQ and/or manual (which would apply even if you're not using squid). > > TIA > > Regards, > ----------- > Faisal ?. Naik > Karachi. I hope this helps, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rbailleu at kewanee.com Sun Nov 24 22:52:23 2002 From: rbailleu at kewanee.com (Robert Bailleu) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) signup disk Message-ID: <00fe01c2943e$71f65f10$a52da30c@thomastrain> Hi, does anyone have a suggestion for what to use for sign up disks. I have been using ms ieak, but was considering a customized disk. Rob Kewanee.com 214 S. Main st Suite A Kewanee, IL 61443 309 852 9994 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From faisal at hamdard.net.pk Sun Nov 24 22:19:06 2002 From: faisal at hamdard.net.pk (Faisal S. Naik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands References: Message-ID: <00af01c29439$cb7a93d0$082d85ca@SNE2> Naminda it could be the PSTN switch problem? Did you try talking to your local exchange about this issue? -- Faisal ----- Original Message ----- From: "naminda" To: "Faisal S. Naik" ; "Troy Settle" ; "'Ascend-users'" Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:56 AM Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > I have a problem in my MAX TNT boxes.I have configured it to receive caller > ID for dialup connections.I have a intermittent problem of receiving caller > ID.Caller ID is missing for some calls(from the same PSTN switch & same > customer & same PSTN traffic route). > > Anyone can help me to analyse this? > > Naminda > > -----Original Message----- > From: Faisal S. Naik [mailto:faisal@hamdard.net.pk] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:35 AM > To: naminda@sltnet.lk; Troy Settle; 'Ascend-users' > Subject: Re: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > Thanks for answer Naminda, I'll try this ASAP :) > One thing, what is the need for setting the paramters in the radius profile > ? > Should TNT by default redirect all port 80 traffic to the proxy server > Regards, > Faisal Naik > Karachi > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "naminda" > To: "Troy Settle" ; "'Faisal S. Naik'" > ; "'Ascend-users'" > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:20 AM > Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 11/20/2002 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ANoriega at prima.com.ar Mon Nov 25 06:14:43 2002 From: ANoriega at prima.com.ar (Noriega, Alejandro) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands Message-ID: Hello, I just was reading the mails and I saw this message then a question came around me. Use the Max TNT some kind of protocol like wccp as cisco for doing the redirection? or it only switch the MAC address (obviously the tnt and the cache must be in the same subnet) Regards, Alejandro. -----Original Message----- From: naminda [mailto:naminda@sltnet.lk] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:20 AM To: Troy Settle; 'Faisal S. Naik'; 'Ascend-users' Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands I think what you need is For redirecting web traffic you can try the following.I extracted them from another chain-mail.You can try the folowing. in Maxtnt user connection profile admin>read conn any admin>list port-redirect admin>set protocol=tcp admin>set port-number=80 admin>set redirect-server=ip.address.of.proxy admin>wr This will cause user requests for port 80 to forward to your proxy server. In radius user profile Ascend-Port-Redir-Protocol=Ascend-Proto-TCP, Ascend-Port-Redir-Portnum=80, Ascend-Port-Redir-Server=ip.address.of.proxy Note that the proxy should be in the same subnet as of Maxtnt (I think) Hope this will help .... -----Original Message----- From: rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com [mailto:rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com]On Behalf Of Troy Settle Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM To: 'Faisal S. Naik'; 'Ascend-users' Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Faisal S. Naik > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:40 AM > To: Ascend-users > Subject: (ASCEND) TNT config-commands > > > Hello All, > I need to monitor the modem success rate and call success rate for all > incoming user calls on my TNT. Is there a specific command to > check this or > do i need to enable some debug? > The best way to do this, is via radius and/or syslog accounting. I've set my radius server to record all accounting data to a SQL server, from which, I can quickly generate reports on connect speeds, disconnect causes, connection failures, etc... In order to see failed connection attempts, you'll need to set external-auth/rad-acct-client/acct-stop-only = yes. > 2ndly what type of message do i need to enable for syslog messages to > display E1 link down messages on my syslog server. Log/syslog-level = critical If you have an SNMP server, you can enable trap messages, which should be more efficient than scanning syslog for such issues. > > And finally i need to define policy routing on the TNT box to > redirect all > port 80 traffic to my proxy server forcefully, how to go about it? I don't know if you can set up a port redirect in the TNT, but I do know that you can set up filters to block port 80 traffic to anything except your proxies (which is a good idea in general). The only drawback to this, is that your users will need to manually set their proxy server address. I would recommend either setting your proxy server between the TNT and border router, or do the redirect on the border router itself (there's a sample configuration in the Squid FAQ and/or manual (which would apply even if you're not using squid). > > TIA > > Regards, > ----------- > Faisal ?. Naik > Karachi. I hope this helps, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ________________________________________ ESTE MENSAJE ELECTRONICO ESTA DIRIGIDO SOLAMENTE A LA PERSONA O ENTIDAD MENCIONADA EN LA DIRECCION A LA CUAL FUE ENVIADO. PUEDE CONTENER INFORMACION CONFIDENCIAL Y LEGALMENTE PROTEGIDA. ESTA PROHIBIDA LA REVISION, DIVULGACION, DISTRIBUCION, PUBLICACION, IMPRESION, COPIA O ACCION EN RELACION CON ESTA INFORMACION, POR PERSONAS O ENTIDADES DISTINTAS AL DESTINATARIO. SI USTED RECIBIO POR ERROR ESTE MENSAJE LE ROGAMOS REENVIARLO AL EMISOR Y DESTRUIR LAS COPIAS IMPRESAS O GRABADAS EN SU SISTEMA. PRIMA S.A. - CLARIN GLOBAL S.A. UNIDAD INTERNET DEL GRUPO CLARIN ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Mon Nov 25 06:58:22 2002 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Message-ID: Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I wanted to repost my plea for help. Thanks. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ -----Original Message----- From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Hi all, I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me first start with what I had. 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards to using a channelized DS3 card. My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a modem to answer the call. Before completing modem negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from the user's computer modem, probably because the modems had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility between the modems. These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot on my head from banging it on the wall. Thanks. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From b.weeber at viastore.de Mon Nov 25 07:43:06 2002 From: b.weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000d01c29488$95c6ebe0$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> See the RADIUS documentation: Disconnect code 185 -> remote end hung up Progress code 30 -> virtual connection has ended. Looks like there is a very tight timeout on the connection program on your clients. Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > niblettda@gru.com > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I > wanted to repost my plea for help. > > Thanks. > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Hi all, > > I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've > got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me > first start with what I had. > > 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. > We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. > > We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's > and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from > the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. > > At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards > to using a channelized DS3 card. > > > My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work > just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my > Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the > disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = > > The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a > modem to answer the call. Before completing modem > negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from > the user's computer modem, probably because the modems > had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem > has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality > occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The > problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility > between the modems. > > These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but > never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows > laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. > > To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using > a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They > get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. > > So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the > ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. > > Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot > on my head from banging it on the wall. > > Thanks. > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From b.weeber at viastore.de Mon Nov 25 07:42:42 2002 From: b.weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000c01c29488$877cc780$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > niblettda@gru.com > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I > wanted to repost my plea for help. > > Thanks. > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Hi all, > > I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've > got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me > first start with what I had. > > 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. > We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. > > We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's > and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from > the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. > > At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards > to using a channelized DS3 card. > > > My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work > just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my > Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the > disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = > > The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a > modem to answer the call. Before completing modem > negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from > the user's computer modem, probably because the modems > had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem > has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality > occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The > problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility > between the modems. > > These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but > never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows > laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. > > To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using > a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They > get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. > > So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the > ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. > > Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot > on my head from banging it on the wall. > > Thanks. > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From b.weeber at viastore.de Mon Nov 25 08:53:09 2002 From: b.weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000e01c29492$5f5e0b10$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> Looks like the PPP handshake fails. I would use a telnet client which can capture to file, go into diagnostics mode and do a "wannext 1500". Feed that file to "ethereal" and you will get a quite good understanding what happens. For a quick analysis of the snipplet you gave I would say that the giving away of the IP address fails or is late since the host is still "0.0.0.0". Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:15 PM > To: b.weeber@viastore.de > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Burkhard, > > It takes 20 seconds from the time the call starts to when > the TNT hangs up. I suppose that is could be too short, but > that doesn't seem to be to me. Here is a chunk of syslog > that I have on one of these calls. > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Incoming Call, > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > 3523795987->3525821111] > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Assigned to port, > 3523795987 [MBID > 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] > Nov 25 08:56:55 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Connected, > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > 3523795987->3525821111] > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Disconnected [MBID 2214; > 3523795987->3525821111] > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Call Terminated [MBID 2214; > 3523795987->3525821111] > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/5: [1/5/72/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause > 185.; progress > 30.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] [Answer] > > Thanks! > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:42 AM > > To: niblettda@gru.com > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > See the RADIUS documentation: > > > > Disconnect code 185 -> remote end hung up > > Progress code 30 -> virtual connection has ended. > > > > Looks like there is a very tight timeout on the connection > > program on your > > clients. > > > > Burkhard Weeber > > viastore systems GmbH > > P/O Box 300668 > > D-70446 Stuttgart > > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > > > Disclaimer: > > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > > and do not > > represent those of my employer. > > > > Windows95: n. > > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch > to an 8 bit > > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > > written by > > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > > > niblettda@gru.com > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 PM > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > Subject: FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I > > > wanted to repost my plea for help. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've > > > got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me > > > first start with what I had. > > > > > > 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. > > > We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. > > > > > > We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's > > > and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from > > > the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. > > > > > > At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards > > > to using a channelized DS3 card. > > > > > > > > > My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work > > > just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my > > > Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the > > > disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = > > > > > > The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a > > > modem to answer the call. Before completing modem > > > negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from > > > the user's computer modem, probably because the modems > > > had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem > > > has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality > > > occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The > > > problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility > > > between the modems. > > > > > > These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but > > > never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows > > > laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. > > > > > > To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using > > > a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They > > > get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. > > > > > > So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the > > > ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. > > > > > > Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot > > > on my head from banging it on the wall. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Mon Nov 25 10:24:34 2002 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Message-ID: Burkhard, Actually, I know it's hanging up at the LCP negotiation. I'm still confused why it works on my old number, but not my new number. The hardware is the same, the TAOS version is the same. People seem to negotiate the same connect speed as before, and can't connect, but if they force the modem to connect at a lower speed (like 33.6) they connect just fine to the new number. Here is a log from a machine calling my new number: 10/25/02 5:12 PM Dialing 5821111 10/25/02 5:12 PM CCL write: "ATDT5821111\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "49333" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM PPP connection started. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On ... Repeated 6 more times ... 10/25/02 5:13 PM No response from the remote side. 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM The remote side is not responding correctly. 10/25/02 5:13 PM Connection terminated. On the same machine, dialing my old number, I get this: 10/25/02 5:20 PM Dialing 3777997 10/25/02 5:20 PM CCL write: "ATDT3777997\13" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "PROTOCOL: LAP" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "49333" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "\10" 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP connection started. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xD1BB17CD. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Received Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> MRU = 1524. ... All the normal PPP negotiation ... 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP ready for TCP/IP with IP address 64.238.160.252. 10/25/02 5:21 PM Connection established at 49333 bps. 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:22 PM Connection terminated. Thanks again. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:53 AM > To: niblettda@gru.com; Ascend User List (E-Mail) > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Looks like the PPP handshake fails. > I would use a telnet client which can capture to file, go > into diagnostics > mode and do a "wannext 1500". > Feed that file to "ethereal" and you will get a quite good > understanding > what happens. > > For a quick analysis of the snipplet you gave I would say > that the giving > away of the IP address fails or is late since the host is > still "0.0.0.0". > > Burkhard Weeber > viastore systems GmbH > P/O Box 300668 > D-70446 Stuttgart > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > Disclaimer: > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > and do not > represent those of my employer. > > Windows95: n. > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > written by > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:15 PM > > To: b.weeber@viastore.de > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > Burkhard, > > > > It takes 20 seconds from the time the call starts to when > > the TNT hangs up. I suppose that is could be too short, but > > that doesn't seem to be to me. Here is a chunk of syslog > > that I have on one of these calls. > > > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Incoming Call, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Assigned to port, > > 3523795987 [MBID > > 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:55 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Connected, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Disconnected [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Call Terminated [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/5: [1/5/72/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause > > 185.; progress > > 30.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] [Answer] > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:42 AM > > > To: niblettda@gru.com > > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > See the RADIUS documentation: > > > > > > Disconnect code 185 -> remote end hung up > > > Progress code 30 -> virtual connection has ended. > > > > > > Looks like there is a very tight timeout on the connection > > > program on your > > > clients. > > > > > > Burkhard Weeber > > > viastore systems GmbH > > > P/O Box 300668 > > > D-70446 Stuttgart > > > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > > > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > > > and do not > > > represent those of my employer. > > > > > > Windows95: n. > > > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch > > to an 8 bit > > > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > > > written by > > > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > > > > niblettda@gru.com > > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 PM > > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > > Subject: FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I > > > > wanted to repost my plea for help. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM > > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've > > > > got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me > > > > first start with what I had. > > > > > > > > 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. > > > > We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. > > > > > > > > We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's > > > > and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from > > > > the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. > > > > > > > > At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards > > > > to using a channelized DS3 card. > > > > > > > > > > > > My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work > > > > just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my > > > > Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the > > > > disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = > > > > > > > > The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a > > > > modem to answer the call. Before completing modem > > > > negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from > > > > the user's computer modem, probably because the modems > > > > had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem > > > > has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality > > > > occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The > > > > problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility > > > > between the modems. > > > > > > > > These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but > > > > never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows > > > > laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. > > > > > > > > To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using > > > > a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They > > > > get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. > > > > > > > > So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the > > > > ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. > > > > > > > > Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot > > > > on my head from banging it on the wall. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Mon Nov 25 12:52:42 2002 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Message-ID: To follow up on this some more, it seems that all the modems that have problems are related to the poor quality HCF and AOPEN modems that some people have. A lot of the customers are people with iMac's that have very cheap on-board modems based on these chipsets. Maybe just a normal fix for these modems might solve my problems. Any advice on them would be helpful. Thanks. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:53 AM > To: niblettda@gru.com; Ascend User List (E-Mail) > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Looks like the PPP handshake fails. > I would use a telnet client which can capture to file, go > into diagnostics > mode and do a "wannext 1500". > Feed that file to "ethereal" and you will get a quite good > understanding > what happens. > > For a quick analysis of the snipplet you gave I would say > that the giving > away of the IP address fails or is late since the host is > still "0.0.0.0". > > Burkhard Weeber > viastore systems GmbH > P/O Box 300668 > D-70446 Stuttgart > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > Disclaimer: > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > and do not > represent those of my employer. > > Windows95: n. > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > written by > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:15 PM > > To: b.weeber@viastore.de > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > Burkhard, > > > > It takes 20 seconds from the time the call starts to when > > the TNT hangs up. I suppose that is could be too short, but > > that doesn't seem to be to me. Here is a chunk of syslog > > that I have on one of these calls. > > > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Incoming Call, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Assigned to port, > > 3523795987 [MBID > > 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:55 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Connected, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Disconnected [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Call Terminated [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/5: [1/5/72/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause > > 185.; progress > > 30.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] [Answer] > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:42 AM > > > To: niblettda@gru.com > > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > See the RADIUS documentation: > > > > > > Disconnect code 185 -> remote end hung up > > > Progress code 30 -> virtual connection has ended. > > > > > > Looks like there is a very tight timeout on the connection > > > program on your > > > clients. > > > > > > Burkhard Weeber > > > viastore systems GmbH > > > P/O Box 300668 > > > D-70446 Stuttgart > > > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > > > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > > > and do not > > > represent those of my employer. > > > > > > Windows95: n. > > > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch > > to an 8 bit > > > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > > > written by > > > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of > > > > niblettda@gru.com > > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 PM > > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > > Subject: FW: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any thoughts on below? No on responded so I > > > > wanted to repost my plea for help. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:25 PM > > > > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'm hoping that some still read this list out there. I've > > > > got a very strange issue with a group of users. Let me > > > > first start with what I had. > > > > > > > > 2 MaxTNT's with 96 port modem cards and 2 8 port T1 cards. > > > > We received all of our PRI's from the local telco. > > > > > > > > We then purchased our own telco switch to handle our PRI's > > > > and stop paying the local telco. So now we get trunks from > > > > the LEC, which I then turn into PRI's to service our TNT's. > > > > > > > > At the same time I switched from using the 8 port T1 cards > > > > to using a channelized DS3 card. > > > > > > > > > > > > My problem is with the new set up, 99% of my customers work > > > > just fine. However, it would appear that almost all of my > > > > Mac clients can't connect, they get a 185/30 for the > > > > disconnect/progress code. According to Ascend 185/30 = > > > > > > > > The TAOS unit received the user's modem call and allocated a > > > > modem to answer the call. Before completing modem > > > > negotiation, the TAOS unit could not detect any signal from > > > > the user's computer modem, probably because the modems > > > > had marginal line quality. Because the TAOS unit's modem > > > > has a digital connection to its local CO, the poor line quality > > > > occurred between the user's modem and its local CO. The > > > > problem might also have been caused by an incompatibility > > > > between the modems. > > > > > > > > These customers can connect at speeds slower than ~40k, but > > > > never connect at higher. The weird part is that a Windows > > > > laptop works just fine at 49k on their phone line. > > > > > > > > To add to the weirdness, I now have one ISDN customer (using > > > > a windows PC) that can connect at 56K, but not at 64K. They > > > > get the exact same 185/30 as the Mac people. > > > > > > > > So I don't see how it can be phone line related since the > > > > ISDN user has digital lines, and we have digital PRI's. > > > > > > > > Please help me before I loose all my hair and have a flat spot > > > > on my head from banging it on the wall. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Nov 25 14:26:43 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 proble m Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B424@trinidad.solunet.com> Do you have a system-ip-address configured? Both in 'ip-glo' and "ip-int {{0 0 0}}"? These 2 IP must be unique (in your network) and configured the same in both places (on the TNT). It will be your new source IP for all IP packets leaving the chassis. I've seen cases like you describe because this was not configured correctly.....esp with WebTV Users! It screws up IPNCP for some modems. my $.02, - David -----Original Message----- From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:25 AM To: b.weeber@viastore.de; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem Burkhard, Actually, I know it's hanging up at the LCP negotiation. I'm still confused why it works on my old number, but not my new number. The hardware is the same, the TAOS version is the same. People seem to negotiate the same connect speed as before, and can't connect, but if they force the modem to connect at a lower speed (like 33.6) they connect just fine to the new number. Here is a log from a machine calling my new number: 10/25/02 5:12 PM Dialing 5821111 10/25/02 5:12 PM CCL write: "ATDT5821111\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "49333" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM PPP connection started. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On ... Repeated 6 more times ... 10/25/02 5:13 PM No response from the remote side. 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:13 PM The remote side is not responding correctly. 10/25/02 5:13 PM Connection terminated. On the same machine, dialing my old number, I get this: 10/25/02 5:20 PM Dialing 3777997 10/25/02 5:20 PM CCL write: "ATDT3777997\13" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "PROTOCOL: LAP" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "49333" 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "\10" 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP connection started. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xD1BB17CD. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Received Configuration Request. 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> MRU = 1524. ... All the normal PPP negotiation ... 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP ready for TCP/IP with IP address 64.238.160.252. 10/25/02 5:21 PM Connection established at 49333 bps. 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" 10/25/02 5:22 PM Connection terminated. Thanks again. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:53 AM > To: niblettda@gru.com; Ascend User List (E-Mail) > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > Looks like the PPP handshake fails. > I would use a telnet client which can capture to file, go > into diagnostics > mode and do a "wannext 1500". > Feed that file to "ethereal" and you will get a quite good > understanding > what happens. > > For a quick analysis of the snipplet you gave I would say > that the giving > away of the IP address fails or is late since the host is > still "0.0.0.0". > > Burkhard Weeber > viastore systems GmbH > P/O Box 300668 > D-70446 Stuttgart > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > Disclaimer: > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > and do not > represent those of my employer. > > Windows95: n. > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > written by > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:15 PM > > To: b.weeber@viastore.de > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > Burkhard, > > > > It takes 20 seconds from the time the call starts to when > > the TNT hangs up. I suppose that is could be too short, but > > that doesn't seem to be to me. Here is a chunk of syslog > > that I have on one of these calls. > > > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Incoming Call, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Assigned to port, > > 3523795987 [MBID > > 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:56:55 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Connected, > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Disconnected [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Call Terminated [MBID 2214; > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/5: [1/5/72/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause > > 185.; progress > > 30.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] [Answer] > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From niblettda at gru.com Mon Nov 25 16:02:24 2002 From: niblettda at gru.com (niblettda@gru.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:32 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 proble m Message-ID: Hi David, I've got an IP set in ip-global as 209.251.129.59 (in case that matters). I do not have one set for ip-interface {{0 0 0}} but I do have the same IP address set on ip-interface {{1 16 1}0} (which is my ethernet connection for the TNT). I'm not sure that I understand, the TNT won't let me set the same IP address on {{0 0 0}}. Are you saying to use something like 209.251.129.60 for {{0 0 0}}? I'm willing to try anything once, just want to make sure I'm trying the right thing. I should mention that I'm running TAOS v9.0.3 and the working TNT does not have an IP set in the {{0 0 0}} interface either and it doesn't seem to have a problem with the same users that can't use my other TNT's. I'm hoping to upgrade to TAOS v9.0.9 tomorrow. -- David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: DPascarella@solunet.com [mailto:DPascarella@solunet.com] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:27 PM > To: niblettda@gru.com; b.weeber@viastore.de; ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: RE: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 > proble m > > > Do you have a system-ip-address configured? Both in 'ip-glo' > and "ip-int > {{0 0 0}}"? These 2 IP must be unique (in your network) and > configured the > same in both places (on the TNT). It will be your new source > IP for all IP > packets leaving the chassis. I've seen cases like you > describe because this > was not configured correctly.....esp with WebTV Users! It > screws up IPNCP > for some modems. > > my $.02, > > - David > > > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:25 AM > To: b.weeber@viastore.de; ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress > 30 problem > > > Burkhard, > > Actually, I know it's hanging up at the LCP negotiation. > I'm still confused why it works on my old number, but > not my new number. The hardware is the same, the TAOS > version is the same. People seem to negotiate the same > connect speed as before, and can't connect, but if they > force the modem to connect at a lower speed (like 33.6) > they connect just fine to the new number. > > Here is a log from a machine calling my new number: > > 10/25/02 5:12 PM Dialing 5821111 > 10/25/02 5:12 PM CCL write: "ATDT5821111\13" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "49333" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "\10" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM PPP connection started. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xB4EA711E. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On > 10/25/02 5:13 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On > ... Repeated 6 more times ... > 10/25/02 5:13 PM No response from the remote side. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" > 10/25/02 5:13 PM The remote side is not responding correctly. > 10/25/02 5:13 PM Connection terminated. > > > On the same machine, dialing my old number, I get this: > > 10/25/02 5:20 PM Dialing 3777997 > 10/25/02 5:20 PM CCL write: "ATDT3777997\13" > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CARRIER" > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "PROTOCOL: LAP" > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "CONNECT " > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "49333" > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL match: "\10" > 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP connection started. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Sending Configuration Request. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Async Map = 0x00000000. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Magic Number = 0xD1BB17CD. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Protocol Compression On > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> Address/Control Compression On > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: Received Configuration Request. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM LCP: >> MRU = 1524. > ... All the normal PPP negotiation ... > 10/25/02 5:21 PM PPP ready for TCP/IP with IP address > 64.238.160.252. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM Connection established at 49333 bps. > 10/25/02 5:21 PM CCL write: "+++ATH\13" > 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" > 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL write: "AT&F\13" > 10/25/02 5:22 PM CCL match: "OK\13\10" > 10/25/02 5:22 PM Connection terminated. > > Thanks again. > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burkhard Weeber [mailto:b.weeber@viastore.de] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:53 AM > > To: niblettda@gru.com; Ascend User List (E-Mail) > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > Looks like the PPP handshake fails. > > I would use a telnet client which can capture to file, go > > into diagnostics > > mode and do a "wannext 1500". > > Feed that file to "ethereal" and you will get a quite good > > understanding > > what happens. > > > > For a quick analysis of the snipplet you gave I would say > > that the giving > > away of the IP address fails or is late since the host is > > still "0.0.0.0". > > > > Burkhard Weeber > > viastore systems GmbH > > P/O Box 300668 > > D-70446 Stuttgart > > Tel: +49-711-9818-0 > > Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de > > > > Disclaimer: > > The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view > > and do not > > represent those of my employer. > > > > Windows95: n. > > 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch > to an 8 bit > > operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, > > written by > > a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:15 PM > > > To: b.weeber@viastore.de > > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem > > > > > > > > > Burkhard, > > > > > > It takes 20 seconds from the time the call starts to when > > > the TNT hangs up. I suppose that is could be too short, but > > > that doesn't seem to be to me. Here is a chunk of syslog > > > that I have on one of these calls. > > > > > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Incoming Call, > > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > > Nov 25 08:56:53 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Assigned to port, > > > 3523795987 [MBID > > > 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] > > > Nov 25 08:56:55 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Connected, > > > 3523795987 [MBID 2214; > > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/1/1/14] Call Disconnected > [MBID 2214; > > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/17: [1/5/72/0] Call Terminated [MBID 2214; > > > 3523795987->3525821111] > > > Nov 25 08:57:16 tnt2 1/5: [1/5/72/0] STOP: 'Answer'; cause > > > 185.; progress > > > 30.; host 0.0.0.0 [MBID 2214; 3523795987->3525821111] [Answer] > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cmail9999jp at yahoo.co.jp Tue Nov 26 03:08:06 2002 From: cmail9999jp at yahoo.co.jp (=?iso-2022-jp?B?ZGk=?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:32 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCTCQ+NUJ6OS05cCIoRUU7UiVhITwlazktOXAbKEo=?= Message-ID: <200211260910.SAA03815@pool> <送信者> 電子メール広告社 今後、広告をご希望しない方はここへ (必ず本文にあなたのメールアドレスのみをお書き下さい） me463886@members.interq.or.jp メールアドレスをご記入してください。 〒104-0061 東京都中央区銀座8-19-3 第2ウイングビル　3F メールマガジン発行 TEL　03-3544-6222 FAX　03-3544-6218 =============================================================== 問題商品ばかり集めましたので、消される恐れがありますので お申込みはお早めに！ ================================================================= ☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆ 裏ビデオ販売・ロリビデオ・特殊ダッチワイフ・ＳＭクラブ 　　 ＡＶ男優募集・援助交際・ＳＥＸフレンド・アダルトグッズなど ★　アダルト関連の情報満載　★ ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ 　　お申込み・ご注文・商品詳細等は　 　　　　　下記ＵＲＬをクリックしてご覧下さい。 ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ↓　　　　↓　　　　↓　 　　　http://changeboy.kir.jp/ ☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆ 　　　　　　　　開運グッズ・極秘情報誌 　　　　防犯グッズ・金儲け情報・ダイエット食品など　 　　　　　　　　★　その他情報満載　★ ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ 　　お申込み・ご注文・商品詳細等は　 　　　　　下記ＵＲＬをクリックしてご覧下さい。 ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ ↓　　　　↓　　　　↓　 http://changeboy.kir.jp/index2.html ☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆―――☆ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Tue Nov 26 06:02:37 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:32 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Disconnect code 185, Progress 30 problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000701c29543$b6e93740$562efea9@psknet.com> I could have sworn that I responded to this one.. From greg_karefasmart at spinfinder.com Wed Nov 27 06:11:38 2002 From: greg_karefasmart at spinfinder.com (Mr. Greg Karekasmart) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] I need you urgent response/call Message-ID: <200211271211.gARCBHI09836@outlaw.real-time.com> NOTE: PLEASE DIRECT ALL RESPONSE TO EMAIL ACCOUNT CONTAINED IN THIS LETTER FOR CONFIDENTIAL PURPOSE. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL FROM: Mr. GREG KAREFA-SMART Tel: +234 8037 210 251 E-mail: greg_karefasmart@mail.com Attention Please, BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP SOLICITED May I take the privilege to introduce myself; I am the son of Late Dr. John Karefa-Smart who was a renowned politician of the republic of Sierra Leone in West Africa. I presume you are aware when a group of rebel soldiers led by Sir. Foday Sankoh overthrew the Government of Sierra Leone forcing the President out of power and killing a number of ministers including some politicians. After this political crisis, My Father went into exile for safety due to pursuance from the present government under the leadership of Alhaji Tijan Kabbah who sees my father as an opposition to his corrupt government. My father while in exile died, may his soul rest in peace? Before his death, he has in his possession a treasure containing a huge sum of US$15M (Fifteen Million, United States Dollars). Which he entrusted to me as his next of kin. However, when it became apparently obvious that the country was no longer safe for citizens due to political crises: massive killing and destruction of properties, I deposited the funds with a discrete Courier/Security company for further shipment and safe-keeping to Europe while I flee to Nigeria as a political refugee. The Courier/Security Company based on my recommendation on that note can only release the funds to you. Meanwhile, I am soliciting for a reliable and trust worthy person who will serve as the guardian/investor of this fund, with whom I could plan the best way to invest funds into a profitable business. And this is why I decide to contact you with all hope that you will help me achieve this dream. To show my appreciation for your assistance in actualising this business with me, I shall give you 25% of the total money and 5% for miscellaneous expense while the remaining 70% belong to me, which I intend to re-invest into any profitable Business in your country. Please, I need your entire support and co-operation for the success of the business venture, your utmost confidentially, sincerity and secrecy is highly required, due to my family's present predicament. Details of how I intend to carry out this project will be discussed as soon as I get a response of your willingness and interest. I sincerely will appreciate your urgent acknowledgment as soon as possible by contacting me on my Telephone number: +234 8037 210 251 or E-mail address. Thank you. Yours truly, Mr. GREG KAREFA-SMART NOTE: YOUR FAX & PHONE NUMBER ARE VERY IMPORTANT, AS BUSINESS OF THIS MAGNITUDE AND NATURE IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE DONE VIA E-MAIL. From Brian.Robison at co.charlotte.fl.us Wed Nov 27 11:14:54 2002 From: Brian.Robison at co.charlotte.fl.us (Brian Robison) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend Max 4000 not booting Message-ID: Hi there- I'm new to this forum, but I have heard it is informative. I have a used Ascend Max 4000 that I bought used from a friend's ex-boss who runs an ISP. It came with (3) MX-SL-16MOD-S56 modules. When I received it, it booted fine, and I was able to serial console into it with no problems. I put it into the rack w/ all of the other routers and plugged the ISDN connection into it and began configuring it, then got called away to another project. It stayed there powered up for about a month, when I came back to it. It now will not boot if any of the 16MOD modules are plugged in. If I remove them, it boots fine. The documentation is somewhat lacking for troubleshooting this device. I'm a Cisco CCNA and usually can figure most anything out, but I can't get a handle on this one. Any ideas? Thanks Brian Robison ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** From jlewis at morgan.net Wed Nov 27 16:35:29 2002 From: jlewis at morgan.net (Jim Lewis) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MaxTNT incompatable with certain modems? Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20021127162929.0270ca18@mail.morgan.net> I am running a TNT ver 9.1.2. I am using mixed PRI lines and CH T1's. Some of my users can dial up and have no problems, others get a solid single tone (no training/handshaking tones). The suspect modems appear to be manufactured by USR and Lucent Win modems. Has anyone else encountered this problem or something similar? And what's the fix? Thanks, Jim From digital-camera-sale at max.bungi.com Thu Nov 28 02:42:59 2002 From: digital-camera-sale at max.bungi.com (digital-camera-sale@max.bungi.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Sale - Digital Cameras. Lowest prices available on the net! Message-ID: KHmx5TmXO0LBjjSB@max.bungi.com Dear ascend-users@max.bungi.com: A picture's worth a thousand words, but a great digital camera is priceless! (And right now, our best digital cameras are on sale!) Once every year, we take our best-selling digital cameras and slash our already-lowest prices. Things have certainly changed in the digital camera business over the last year. Today, they're better, faster, easier---and prices are lower! Add that to our amazing discounts, and there's never been a better time to get into digital photography---or upgrade to a better camera! http://www.online-camera-shop.net Thank you! WBR, Jimmy Brown. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From digital-camera-sale at ourclub.com Thu Nov 28 07:29:00 2002 From: digital-camera-sale at ourclub.com (digital-camera-sale@ourclub.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Get a lot camera for a lot less money! Message-ID: j4n6c6w4n0f7o2k9y9l0@ourclub.com Hello, If a digital camera is on your shopping list this holiday season don't drive all over town looking for a deal. Just click over to http://online-camera-shop.net where you'll find great prices on a huge selection. How great? How about as much as 50% below retail! For example, $99.99 buys you the Kodak DC-3200, a 1.0 megapixel camera with 2x digital zoom. An affordable way to capture memories that will last a lifetime. What a wonderful gift for a new parent or grandparent! http://online-camera-shop.net/kodak/DC-3200.htm Or $299.99 for the Pentax Optio 330, one of the smallest and lightest in the 3 megapixel CCD, 3X optical zoom lens category. Take this camera anywhere and don't miss a shot! http://online-camera-shop.net/pentax/330.htm Whatever your budget, you'll get more quality, more capability, more great pictures for your money at Online Camera Shop. We stock lots of models -- more than 500 in all -- from the best manufacturers -- Canon, Epson, Fuji, HP, JVC, Kodak, Leica, Minolta, Nikon, Olympus, Pentax, Sigma and Sony. And we buy in volume so we get big discounts that we pass on to you. At $459.99 you can get into the professional quality range with the Fuji FinePix S602 Zoom. Its new 3rd generation Super CCD system uses Fujifilm's new Pixel Data Coupling Technology to produce ultra sharp, yet colorful 6.0 million pixel images. This could be a great upgrade for the serious photo hobbyist. http://online-camera-shop.net/fuji/S602%20oom.htm At Online Camera Shop you get everything you could get at the store, except the hassle and the higher prices. Secure ordering, all major credit cards accepted, prompt shipping, and your satisfaction is guaranteed. We sell only brand new, factory-sealed units with full manufacturer's warranty. Who are we? Online Camera Shop is a family owned and operated business that's been satisfying customers on the web since 1998 (that's almost forever in internet time). Our goal is to provide the finest products at the lowest prices with the best possible customer service. Please visit us. Our address is http://online-camera-shop.net. P.S. Here are a few more examples of our great prices: Sony CyberShot DSC-P31 -- $159.99 Olympus D380 -- $118.99 HP Photo Smart C618 -- $280.99 JVC GC-QX5HD $509.99 _________ Thank you! _________ _________ WBR, Jimmy Brown. _________ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From digital-camera-sale at max.bungi.com Thu Nov 28 06:01:12 2002 From: digital-camera-sale at max.bungi.com (digital-camera-sale@max.bungi.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Sale - Digital Cameras. Lowest prices available on the net! Message-ID: tAOVmuBugZ7mSM6hVe5JeL@max.bungi.com Dear ascend-users@max.bungi.com: A picture's worth a thousand words, but a great digital camera is priceless! (And right now, our best digital cameras are on sale!) Once every year, we take our best-selling digital cameras and slash our already-lowest prices. Things have certainly changed in the digital camera business over the last year. Today, they're better, faster, easier---and prices are lower! Add that to our amazing discounts, and there's never been a better time to get into digital photography---or upgrade to a better camera! http://www.online-camera-shop.net Thank you! WBR, Jimmy Brown. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From vbranyik at piopc.com Thu Nov 28 13:43:08 2002 From: vbranyik at piopc.com (Vilmos Branyik) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Don't all 4000's support 56k? and one more thing Message-ID: Happy Thanksgiving everyone! I don't expect anyone to see this today (what the hell am I doing working?) so here's a question for tomorrow. Don't all Max's support the MX-SL-16MOD-S56 modem cards. I picked up a Max MXHP-4T1 to use as a backup in case I had 1 or 2 lines go out. I have some of the 56k cards to put in it, thought it would be easy, but the unit doesn't recognize a 56k card. Tried a google search but couldn't find anything. This unit has software version 7.0.4 loaded on it. Was this unit pre-56k modems so it doesn't support this or is there something I have to do to make this work? On a related item, I have another Max MXHP-4T1-4 that does recognize these cards. However, the first Net/T1 10-000 shows Not Avail. The second one 20-000 seems to be active. I've reloaded this unit using Nindy and am running software version 7.0.4. Is there some way to enable the first T1? Or, does that mean that I should just use WAN 3 and WAN 4 if I want to use this as a backup. Thanks. Vilmos ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From catchall at 808hi.com Fri Nov 29 11:27:46 2002 From: catchall at 808hi.com (Richard Gamberg) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:42 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Double messages In-Reply-To: <200211291011010149.0977EE55@mail.powersupply.net> Message-ID: On Oct 31, '02 and continuing throuhg present, I started receiving 2 copies of every message on this list - both addressed to my same e-mail.... Anyone else? BTW - V.92-enabled ISPs are invited to get listed at www.modemsite.com/56k/v929isp.asp by filling in the form at www.modemsite.com/56k/v92iform.asp The listing is free. Aloha, Richard www.modemsite.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From luisveiga at zipmail.com.br Fri Nov 29 12:49:43 2002 From: luisveiga at zipmail.com.br (luisveiga@zipmail.com.br) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) =?iso-8859-1?Q?CALLMGR?= Message-ID: <3DE787C10000081B@www.zipmail.com.br> Hi all, I'm receiving in LOG file, the message bellow: CALLMGR-nn: could not allocate port for route xxxx does anyone know what this message mean? Regards, LuisVeiga ------------------------------------------ Use o melhor sistema de busca da Internet Radar UOL - http://www.radaruol.com.br ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From psc5 at powersupply.net Fri Nov 29 09:11:01 2002 From: psc5 at powersupply.net (John Kern) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend Stacking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200211291011010149.0977EE55@mail.powersupply.net> Anyone stacking maxes? I think this is what it is called. I want a dual channel ISDN customer to be able to hit 2 different maxes and not have a problem with the connection. I have never done this before and need to know how to configure it. I am running max 6000's and 1 4000. I have ver 9.0.6 on the 6k's and 6.1.7 on the 4k. HELP ASAP PLEASE! Thanks, John ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From peters13 at mail.com Sat Nov 30 22:48:44 2002 From: peters13 at mail.com (DENNIS GARVIN) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] URGENT Message-ID: <200211302147.gAULlFc14454@sprite.real-time.com> Attention: I presume this email will not be a surprise to you. Am an engineer with the ministry of mineral resources and energy in south Africa and also a member of the contract awarding committee of this ministry under the south Africa government. Many year ago, the south Africa government asked this committee to awards contracts to foregn firms, in which myself and two of my partner are leader of the committee, with our good position in this committee, we over involved this contract to the tune of of us$21,500,000:00, to be benefited by me and two other of my partner that are in charge of this contract awarding committee in this ministry. Now, that the contracts value has been paid off to the actual contractor that executed this job, All we want is a trusted foreign partner like you that we shall front to claim this over involved sum. Upon our agreement to carry on this business transaction with you, the said fund will be share as follow, 75% will be for myself and two others of my partner, 20% will be for you for using your bank account, 5% will be set aside for any expenses that might be incurred by us and you in the process of the document and other formalities that will justify you as the rightful owner of this said fund. You should bear in mind that you will be required to put head together with us, and give this business transaction moral and financially support it required to be successful. If you are interested and financially capable in handly this business transaction, Kindly reply us through this email address (dennissgarvin@netscape.net) for more details and to let you know what is required of this business transaction to be successful. Also we request your private and office phone number to open communication with you. Your faithfully, DENNIS GARVIN From chris at manual-override.net Sat Nov 30 16:17:03 2002 From: chris at manual-override.net (Chris Orr) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] URGENT References: <200211302147.gAULlFc14454@sprite.real-time.com> Message-ID: <003001c298be$36270410$6401010a@chrometoaster> i would like to donate a wooden nickel. ----- Original Message ----- From: "DENNIS GARVIN" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: [Ascend] URGENT > Attention: > > I presume this email will not be a surprise to you. > > Am an engineer with the ministry of mineral resources > and energy in south Africa and also a member of the > contract awarding committee of this ministry under the south > Africa government. > > Many year ago, the south Africa government asked this committee > to awards contracts to foregn firms, in which myself and two > of my partner are leader of the committee, with our good > position in this committee, we over involved this contract to > the tune of of us$21,500,000:00, to be benefited by me and two > other of my partner that are in charge of this contract awarding > committee in this ministry. > > Now, that the contracts value has been paid off to the actual > contractor that executed this job, All we want is a trusted > foreign partner like you that we shall front to claim this over > involved sum. > > Upon our agreement to carry on this business transaction with you, > the said fund will be share as follow, 75% will be for myself and two > others of my partner, 20% will be for you for using your bank account, > 5% will be set aside for any expenses that might be incurred by us and > you in the process of the document and other formalities that will > justify you as the rightful owner of this said fund. > > You should bear in mind that you will be required to put head together > with us, and give this business transaction moral and financially > support it required to be successful. > > If you are interested and financially capable in handly this business > transaction, Kindly reply us through this email address (dennissgarvin@netscape.net) > for more details and to let you know what is required of this business > transaction to be successful. > > Also we request your private and office phone number to open communication > with you. > > Your faithfully, > > DENNIS GARVIN > > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > From troy at psknet.com Sat Nov 30 20:12:45 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) CALLMGR In-Reply-To: <3DE787C10000081B@www.zipmail.com.br> Message-ID: <002501c298df$236c3c20$23fbab3f@psknet.com> Check your call routes, it seems that you have too many lines routed to a modem slot. If you're using 16 port modem cards, then you can only have 16 DS0 channels routed to each one. HTH, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > luisveiga@zipmail.com.br > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:50 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) CALLMGR > > > Hi all, > > I'm receiving in LOG file, the message bellow: > > CALLMGR-nn: could not allocate port for route xxxx > > does anyone know what this message mean? > > Regards, > LuisVeiga > > > > ------------------------------------------ > Use o melhor sistema de busca da Internet > Radar UOL - http://www.radaruol.com.br > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Nov 30 20:06:14 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Don't all 4000's support 56k? and one more thing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <002301c298de$3a128890$23fbab3f@psknet.com> On the 4000 not recognizing the 56k modems. Make sure you have a 56k load installed, this is indicated by a 'k' in the firmware file name. Recommend the latest release of ftik.m40 (depending on the features you need). For the other, if it was originally a 4002, it may have been rehashed to enable wan 3 and 4 due to damage to wan ports 1 or 2 (I once had a 4002 with all 4 ports enabled, but wan2 was damaged). HTH, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Vilmos Branyik > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:43 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Don't all 4000's support 56k? and one more thing > > > Happy Thanksgiving everyone! > > I don't expect anyone to see this today (what the hell am I > doing working?) > so here's a question for tomorrow. > > Don't all Max's support the MX-SL-16MOD-S56 modem cards. I > picked up a Max > MXHP-4T1 to use as a backup in case I had 1 or 2 lines go > out. I have some > of the 56k cards to put in it, thought it would be easy, but the unit > doesn't recognize a 56k card. Tried a google search but couldn't find > anything. This unit has software version 7.0.4 loaded on it. > > Was this unit pre-56k modems so it doesn't support this or is there > something I have to do to make this work? > > On a related item, I have another Max MXHP-4T1-4 that does > recognize these > cards. However, the first Net/T1 10-000 shows Not Avail. The > second one > 20-000 seems to be active. > > I've reloaded this unit using Nindy and am running software > version 7.0.4. > Is there some way to enable the first T1? Or, does that mean > that I should > just use WAN 3 and WAN 4 if I want to use this as a backup. > > Thanks. > > Vilmos > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sat Nov 30 20:08:26 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:43 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Ascend Stacking In-Reply-To: <200211291011010149.0977EE55@mail.powersupply.net> Message-ID: <002401c298de$88b414a0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> John, First off, you'll need to be running the same TAOS version on all Maxes that are stacked. Then, to enable stacking, just make sure the key and port are set the same on each max. To minimize problems, I do recommend running OSPF (which will allow a static IP to work on any Max, and for a dynamic IP to temporarily shift to another box if the first half of the link goes down). -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of John Kern > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 10:11 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend Stacking > > > > Anyone stacking maxes? > > I think this is what it is called. > > I want a dual channel ISDN customer to be able to hit 2 > different maxes and not have a problem with the connection. > > I have never done this before and need to know how to configure it. > > I am running max 6000's and 1 4000. > > I have ver 9.0.6 on the 6k's and 6.1.7 on the 4k. > > HELP ASAP PLEASE! > > Thanks, > John > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/