From mknewman at blkbox.com Sun Sep 1 08:27:32 2002 From: mknewman at blkbox.com (Marc Newman) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #2635 In-Reply-To: <200209010545.WAA03392@max.bungi.com> from "owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com" at Aug 31, 2002 10:45:02 PM Message-ID: <200209011327.g81DRW5E019798@blkbox.com> One more item I forgot to include, I have an Ascend Pipeline 400T T1/PRI router with 8 internal modems. Marc > > I have the following for sale: > > 4 Ascend Max 4004 (1 has Frame relay option, all have ISDN PRI) > 11 56kb 8 port modem cards > 7 56kb 12 port modem cards > > Please contact me off list at marc@newman.org for prices and such. > > Thanks, > Marc > y ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From robg at sportsline.com Sun Sep 1 10:53:08 2002 From: robg at sportsline.com (RG) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) max-1800 and NAT help needed... Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020901105154.0292f208@mail.sportsline.com> Whats up Ascend users... I have an issue with a MAX-1800 and NAT. I am doing IP only and have 8 bri interfaces. I am running 6.0.4 fbck.m18 What I am trying to do is dial into a partner site and hide all my traffic as a 172. addr. to this network. I am not being assigned an IP address by this partner. I have my local net, with hosts and the MAX. I can successfully connect to the partner and ftp to their ftp servers. I have static routes on the MAX for their servers to the LAN address of their router specified in my connection profile. Pretty simple connection. In my connection profile, under IP options, I have the LAN address of the remote end router, and as the IF ADRS, I have an IP on the same network, which is the address I want our traffic hidden behind. I have tried this scenario with and without an IF adrs in the connection profile. They have another set of servers I need to reach. I will only be able to reach if I am hidden behind a 172 address, since they will not add static routes for my return traffic, since the are publicly routable (which I suppose is against their policies). I have used NAT to connect pipelines to ISPs and hide a localnet behind the ISP assigned addr, but the MAX is not setup like this, and when I enable NAT weird things happen. I have download m18net.pdf and read it. First thing I do is : go to ETHERNET-----> NAT and turn Routing to YES. for Profile, I put the ethernet connection profile name. LAN is set to Single IP addr As soon as I save this, my default route gets changed to the LAN address on the connection profile. Since this is a problem, I disabled the default route and added static routes back to my local nets, so if the default route gets mangled, Im not stuck to console only. For the FR address ( and I know Im not using FrameRelay), if I leave at 0.0.0.0 or put an IP address on the same network as the BRI interface (LAN Address) I am able to ping the first set of servers, but FTP does not work. I can not ping the second set of servers or FTP. So my questions are this: 1) Is what I am trying to do possible? 2) Will I need to add static mappings back to the hosts that need to access hosts using this connection? Is appears as if the return traffic is not making it. 3) Why does the default route change when I enable NAT and traffic is sent to this remote network? Any help is greatly appreciated. -Rob Robert Geller, CCSA, CCSE Sportsline Network Operations 2200 West Cypress Creek Rd. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 -954-351-2120 x4528 AIM: rg1454bb ICQ: 451690 http://cbs.sportsline.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Tue Sep 3 08:35:06 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 and POST FAILURE (05), some he lp needed Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B192@trinidad.solunet.com> Max 4000 HP . With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the case and orient the LEDs toward you (the front). . Locate P3 and short it. . Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no flow-control . At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. Down load the software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. . Power down the unit, remove the jumper from P3 and put the cover back on . Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, or use the configurator. Max4000 . With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the case and orient the LEDs toward you (the front). . Locate P6 and short it. . Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no flow-control . At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. Down load the software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. . Power down the unit, remove the jumper from P6 and put the cover back on . Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, or use the configurator. David Pascarella CCNP MCSE LCTE A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Karl Gaissmaier [mailto:karl.gaissmaier@rz.uni-ulm.de] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:19 PM To: Troy Settle Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 and POST FAILURE (05), some help needed Hi Troy, Troy Settle schrieb: > > http://www.tek-tips.com/gviewthread.cfm/lev2/8/lev3/58/pid/574/qid/289636 this describes MAX-6000 and I think the jumpers may be different for MAX-4000. Do you have any more help? Regards and thanks so long already, Charly -- Karl Gaissmaier Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany Email:karl.gaissmaier@rz.uni-ulm.de Network Administration Tel.: ++49 731 50-22499 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From karl.gaissmaier at rz.uni-ulm.de Tue Sep 3 09:03:27 2002 From: karl.gaissmaier at rz.uni-ulm.de (Karl Gaissmaier) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4000 and POST FAILURE (05), some help needed References: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B192@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: <3D74C12F.BBE4CEE6@rz.uni-ulm.de> Dear Ascend helpers DPascarella@solunet.com schrieb: > > Max 4000 HP > > . With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the > case and > orient the LEDs toward you (the front). > . Locate P3 and short it. > . Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no > flow-control > . At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. Down > load the > software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. > . Power down the unit, remove the jumper from P3 and put the cover back on > . Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, > or use the > configurator. > > Max4000 > > . With all cables and power removed remove all cards from the box, open the > case and > orient the LEDs toward you (the front). > . Locate P6 and short it. > . Attach the serial and power cables. Power up at 57600 N-8-1 no > flow-control > . At the > prompt enter DF then upload the correct version of firmware. Down > load the > software using Xmodem 57600-N-8-1 no flowcontrol. > . Power down the unit, remove the jumper from P6 and put the cover back on > . Reconfigure the terminal/serial connection for 9600 and configure the Max, > or use the > configurator. > it worked, the problem is solved, tanx to all repliers! Best regards Charly -- Karl Gaissmaier Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany Email:karl.gaissmaier@rz.uni-ulm.de Network Administration Tel.: ++49 731 50-22499 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From robg at sportsline.com Tue Sep 3 11:01:34 2002 From: robg at sportsline.com (RG) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) max-1800 and NAT help needed...sorry for duplicate post Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020903120115.02432d30@mail.sportsline.com> Whats up Ascend users... I have an issue with a MAX-1800 and NAT. I am doing IP only and have 8 bri interfaces. I am running 6.0.4 fbck.m18 What I am trying to do is dial into a partner site and hide all my traffic as a 172. addr. to this network. I am not being assigned an IP address by this partner. I have my local net, with hosts and the MAX. I can successfully connect to the partner and ftp to their ftp servers. I have static routes on the MAX for their servers to the LAN address of their router specified in my connection profile. Pretty simple connection. In my connection profile, under IP options, I have the LAN address of the remote end router, and as the IF ADRS, I have an IP on the same network, which is the address I want our traffic hidden behind. I have tried this scenario with and without an IF adrs in the connection profile. They have another set of servers I need to reach. I will only be able to reach if I am hidden behind a 172 address, since they will not add static routes for my return traffic, since the are publicly routable (which I suppose is against their policies). I have used NAT to connect pipelines to ISPs and hide a localnet behind the ISP assigned addr, but the MAX is not setup like this, and when I enable NAT weird things happen. I have download m18net.pdf and read it. First thing I do is : go to ETHERNET-----> NAT and turn Routing to YES. for Profile, I put the ethernet connection profile name. LAN is set to Single IP addr As soon as I save this, my default route gets changed to the LAN address on the connection profile. Since this is a problem, I disabled the default route and added static routes back to my local nets, so if the default route gets mangled, Im not stuck to console only. For the FR address ( and I know Im not using FrameRelay), if I leave at 0.0.0.0 or put an IP address on the same network as the BRI interface (LAN Address) I am able to ping the first set of servers, but FTP does not work. I can not ping the second set of servers or FTP. So my questions are this: 1) Is what I am trying to do possible? 2) Will I need to add static mappings back to the hosts that need to access hosts using this connection? Is appears as if the return traffic is not making it. 3) Why does the default route change when I enable NAT and traffic is sent to this remote network? Any help is greatly appreciated. -Rob Robert Geller, CCSA, CCSE Sportsline Network Operations 2200 West Cypress Creek Rd. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 -954-351-2120 x4528 AIM: rg1454bb ICQ: 451690 http://cbs.sportsline.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From kOmatsu at mlcp.com Tue Sep 3 15:50:14 2002 From: kOmatsu at mlcp.com (Kelly Omatsu) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:26 2005 Subject: [Ascend] WTB (today): LUCENT SA100/600 Module: STM1 IPOD, B750A040100 Message-ID: <6939080E7C56C049813D622BFAC05C183BF239@SERVER.mulitlink.local> We need pricing and availability for the following: P/N B750A040100, ATM-OC-3/STM1 IR (15km) Single Mode Dual Port IPOD - the module must have a manufacturing date of at least 1999 and must have black front panel (not white or gray) Please reply if you can help with this request. Thank you! Kelly Omatsu --------------------------------------------------------------------- Kelly Omatsu MLCP - Multi-Link Communications Products WAN/ LAN Equipment: ADC-Kentrox Adtran Ascend Bay Networks Carrier Access Corp. Cascade Cisco / StrataCom Larscom Micom Motorola N.E.T. Newbridge Nortel Networks Paradyne Racal 3Com / US Robotics Timeplex Verilink & others tel.........800 TO MULTI (800 866 8584), ext. 111 tel.........+1 310 320 1451 fax.........+1 310 320 1551 email...... mailto:komatsu@mlcp.com URL........ http://www.mlcp.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- From iots at hq.acn.gr Wed Sep 4 02:56:29 2002 From: iots at hq.acn.gr (Ioanna Tsoukali) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections Message-ID: <3D75BCAD.5B82B536@hq.acn.gr> Good morning , Does a MAX TNT supports sychronous ppp connections over E1 or serial lines? Something similar to what we do with cisco routers... From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Sep 4 10:19:47 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Pipeline Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1A1@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi John, If I understand you correctly, I believe that you want to forward those ports/requests to the PCAnywhere host and not the router. Use SCM to map UDP/TCP ports 5631 and 5632 to the IP address of the server running PC Anywhere on your local network. David Pascarella CCNP MCSE LCTE A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: John Farrell [mailto:isp2@quik.com] Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 9:18 AM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] Pipeline Hello I am hoping that any of you professionals out there might be able to assist me with a configuration issue with an Ascend Pipeline 75 ISDN router. I am currently in charge of a small office network and a specific database program that we have purchased and installed is not working correctly. The authors need PC anywhere access through our router to help diagnose and correct the issues with the database. In order to do this they have asked for me to configure the Pipeline to: Allow their public IP: 66.152.236.146 across any firewall that may be set up in the router and also forward IP request from them (66.152.236.146) to the static IP address of my router for ports 5631 and 5632 to 192.168.1.100. Although I has able to fumble my way through the initial configuration of this router I am clueless on how to accomplish this task correctly. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated Best Regards John Farrell _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Sep 4 10:32:06 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1A2@trinidad.solunet.com> Ioanna , I have done it with both the 8-port CT1 modules and the 10-port UT1 Frame Line modules. There is also a SWAN (Serial WAN) module available that is v.35, I believe. If you use the 8-port CT1 module, you must have available HDLC resources in order to nail up channels for a PPP connection to another router. Otherwise, the 10-port module has built in HDLC resources and can also be multilinked w/ Frame Relay. After you have met the HW requirements, all that is needed is to nail up the channels you want to use ( for channelized T1modules), build a connection profile for the link, and specify the nailed group # in the connection profile. It's covered in the docs for more details. Good Luck, David Pascarella CCNP MCSE LCTE A+ Network Support Engineer SOLUServe TAC 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 888.449.5766 800.795.2814 fax: 321.308.7986 mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Ioanna Tsoukali [mailto:iots@hq.acn.gr] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:56 AM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections Good morning , Does a MAX TNT supports sychronous ppp connections over E1 or serial lines? Something similar to what we do with cisco routers... _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From iots at hq.acn.gr Thu Sep 5 03:17:49 2002 From: iots at hq.acn.gr (Ioanna Tsoukali) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections References: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1A2@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: <3D77132D.2DCB6EB@hq.acn.gr> Hi David , Thank you for your reply.I have set up the following connection profile : new CONNECTION set station = test set active = yes set encapsulation-protocol = ppp set ip-options remote-address = 10.30.30.1/30 set ip-options netmask-remote = 255.255.255.252 set ip-options local-address = 10.30.30.2/30 set ip-options netmask-local = 255.255.255.252 set telco-options call-type = ft1 set telco-options nailed-groups = 90 set telco-options data-service = 128k-clear set mp-options enabled = no write -f ; but the specified addresses do not appear on my routing table and of course I cannot ping it. Any ideas? DPascarella@solunet.com wrote: > > Ioanna , > > I have done it with both the 8-port CT1 modules and the 10-port UT1 Frame > Line modules. There is also a SWAN (Serial WAN) module available that is > v.35, I believe. If you use the 8-port CT1 module, you must have available > HDLC resources in order to nail up channels for a PPP connection to another > router. Otherwise, the 10-port module has built in HDLC resources and can > also be multilinked w/ Frame Relay. > > After you have met the HW requirements, all that is needed is to nail up the > channels you want to use ( for channelized T1modules), build a connection > profile for the link, and specify the nailed group # in the connection > profile. It's covered in the docs for more details. > > Good Luck, > > David Pascarella > CCNP MCSE LCTE A+ > Network Support Engineer > SOLUServe TAC > 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 > Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 > 888.449.5766 > 800.795.2814 > fax: 321.308.7986 > mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com > www.solunet.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ioanna Tsoukali [mailto:iots@hq.acn.gr] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:56 AM > To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections > > Good morning , > > Does a MAX TNT supports sychronous ppp connections over E1 or serial lines? > Something similar to what we do with cisco routers... > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From DPascarella at solunet.com Thu Sep 5 10:24:51 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1B6@trinidad.solunet.com> I believe that it will not appear in the routing table until the connection becomes active. -----Original Message----- From: Ioanna Tsoukali [mailto:iots@hq.acn.gr] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:18 AM To: DPascarella@solunet.com Cc: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: Re: [Ascend] PPP connections Hi David , Thank you for your reply.I have set up the following connection profile : new CONNECTION set station = test set active = yes set encapsulation-protocol = ppp set ip-options remote-address = 10.30.30.1/30 set ip-options netmask-remote = 255.255.255.252 set ip-options local-address = 10.30.30.2/30 set ip-options netmask-local = 255.255.255.252 set telco-options call-type = ft1 set telco-options nailed-groups = 90 set telco-options data-service = 128k-clear set mp-options enabled = no write -f ; but the specified addresses do not appear on my routing table and of course I cannot ping it. Any ideas? DPascarella@solunet.com wrote: > > Ioanna , > > I have done it with both the 8-port CT1 modules and the 10-port UT1 Frame > Line modules. There is also a SWAN (Serial WAN) module available that is > v.35, I believe. If you use the 8-port CT1 module, you must have available > HDLC resources in order to nail up channels for a PPP connection to another > router. Otherwise, the 10-port module has built in HDLC resources and can > also be multilinked w/ Frame Relay. > > After you have met the HW requirements, all that is needed is to nail up the > channels you want to use ( for channelized T1modules), build a connection > profile for the link, and specify the nailed group # in the connection > profile. It's covered in the docs for more details. > > Good Luck, > > David Pascarella > CCNP MCSE LCTE A+ > Network Support Engineer > SOLUServe TAC > 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 > Palm Bay, FL 32905-3562 > 888.449.5766 > 800.795.2814 > fax: 321.308.7986 > mailto:dpascarella@solunet.com > www.solunet.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ioanna Tsoukali [mailto:iots@hq.acn.gr] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:56 AM > To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > Subject: [Ascend] PPP connections > > Good morning , > > Does a MAX TNT supports sychronous ppp connections over E1 or serial lines? > Something similar to what we do with cisco routers... > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From bokhari_jawad at yahoo.com Fri Sep 6 07:37:58 2002 From: bokhari_jawad at yahoo.com (jawad bokhari) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) static ip not working with MAX TNT Message-ID: <20020906123759.63095.qmail@web21002.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, We are using MAX TNT and using Radiator RADIUS server. Everything is fine except static ip assignment from RADIUS. User is authenticated and MAX sends its accounting start record as well. But soon after Acct-Start, Acct-stop is sent and the Ascend-Disconnect-Cause is "unknown"(2). Please help!! Following is brief log of authentication and accounting found at radius server. Code: Access-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxx" User-Password = "<221>Wm<17><232><13><170>y" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP State = "" Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Ascend-Endpoint-Disc = "<1><137><168><185><203><188>#K<11><168> <25><225><168><24><4><147>" Ascend-Data-Rate = 31200 Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 50667 *** Sending to xxx.xxx.xxx.x port 7022 .... Code: Access-Accept Attributes: Framed-IP-Address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xx Session-Timeout = 2511534 ***************************************************** Code: Accounting-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxxxx" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Acct-Status-Type = Start Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Acct-Authentic = RADIUS Ascend-Multilink-ID = 2181694828 Ascend-Num-In-Multilink = 1 Acct-Link-Count = "<0><0><0><1>" Acct-Multi-Session-Id = "820a056c" Ascend-Modem-PortNo = 9 Ascend-Modem-SlotNo = 4 Ascend-Modem-ShelfNo = 1 Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Framed-Protocol = 262 Framed-IP-Address = xxxxxxxxx *** Sending to xxx.xxx.xxx.x port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Response Identifier: 38 Authentic: <191><4><27>N<28><255><11><133><201><29><231><212><232>2<21><194> Attributes: *** Received from xx.xx.xx.xx port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxx" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Acct-Status-Type = Stop Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Acct-Authentic = RADIUS Acct-Session-Time = 1 Acct-Input-Octets = 369 Acct-Output-Octets = 281 Acct-Input-Packets = 13 Acct-Output-Packets = 11 Ascend-Disconnect-Cause = unknown Ascend-Connect-Progress = prLanSessionUp Ascend-Data-Rate = 31200 Ascend-PreSession-Time = 23 Ascend-Pre-Input-Octets = 369 Ascend-Pre-Output-Octets = 275 Ascend-Pre-Input-Packets = 13 Ascend-Pre-Output-Packets = 10 Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 50667 Ascend-Multilink-ID = 2181694828 Ascend-Num-In-Multilink = 0 Acct-Link-Count = "<0><0><0><1>" Acct-Multi-Session-Id = "820a056c" Ascend-Modem-PortNo = 9 Ascend-Modem-SlotNo = 4 Ascend-Modem-ShelfNo = 1 Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Framed-Protocol = 262 Framed-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx *** Sending to xx.xx.xx.xx port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Response ***************************************************** That's all. Session-Time shows that user was connected for one second only. thanks for kind help!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Fri Sep 6 10:14:34 2002 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Cheap Max 6096 for sale Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20020906101434.01decdd0@mail.rockriver.net> In stock and looking for a good home. Max 6096 with 96 v.90 modems installed (6 - 16 port cards). All guaranteed. Tested, reconditioned and reset to factory defaults. Most options installed and the latest firmware installed. $2450.00 815-968-9888 or email. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From obrienj at cuttingedge.net Fri Sep 6 15:45:27 2002 From: obrienj at cuttingedge.net (Jerry O'Brien) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) How to route 3rd-party-sourced packets out from my subnet References: <3.0.3.32.20020906101434.01decdd0@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <001401c255e6$57ddfc00$6501a8c0@cuttingedge.net> Greetings, I am setting up new service with a wholesale satellite provider. Since they use dial-up return, I have to proxy the satellite provider's dynamic IP address back to the user via RADIUS. That is working, but something is preventing packets with their source address from getting back to the satellite provider. I asked my regular backbone provider, Sprint, if they were filtering and if they would allow this traffic, but they say they are not limiting it now. I tried applying data filters in my Max 6096 (my border router) to forward these packets, but this has no effect. Anything else I can try? Jerry O'Brien ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From HKruell at swd-ag.de Mon Sep 9 01:14:02 2002 From: HKruell at swd-ag.de (HKruell@swd-ag.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Antwort: (ASCEND) static ip not working with MAX TNT Message-ID: hello, we use navis radius for our max-tnt and i found that i have to set not only the ip-address but additional a netmask of 255.255.255.255: Framed-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255255.255 Heribert Kruell jawad bokhari Kopie: Gesendet von: Thema: (ASCEND) static ip not working with MAX TNT owner-ascend-users@max .bungi.com 06.09.2002 13:37 Hi, We are using MAX TNT and using Radiator RADIUS server. Everything is fine except static ip assignment from RADIUS. User is authenticated and MAX sends its accounting start record as well. But soon after Acct-Start, Acct-stop is sent and the Ascend-Disconnect-Cause is "unknown"(2). Please help!! Following is brief log of authentication and accounting found at radius server. Code: Access-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxx" User-Password = "<221>Wm<17><232><13><170>y" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP State = "" Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Ascend-Endpoint-Disc = "<1><137><168><185><203><188>#K<11><168> <25><225><168><24><4><147>" Ascend-Data-Rate = 31200 Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 50667 *** Sending to xxx.xxx.xxx.x port 7022 .... Code: Access-Accept Attributes: Framed-IP-Address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xx Session-Timeout = 2511534 ***************************************************** Code: Accounting-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxxxx" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Acct-Status-Type = Start Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Acct-Authentic = RADIUS Ascend-Multilink-ID = 2181694828 Ascend-Num-In-Multilink = 1 Acct-Link-Count = "<0><0><0><1>" Acct-Multi-Session-Id = "820a056c" Ascend-Modem-PortNo = 9 Ascend-Modem-SlotNo = 4 Ascend-Modem-ShelfNo = 1 Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Framed-Protocol = 262 Framed-IP-Address = xxxxxxxxx *** Sending to xxx.xxx.xxx.x port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Response Identifier: 38 Authentic: <191><4><27>N<28><255><11><133><201><29><231><212><232>2<21><194> Attributes: *** Received from xx.xx.xx.xx port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Request Attributes: User-Name = "xxxxx" NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx NAS-Port = 2067 NAS-Port-Type = Async Acct-Status-Type = Stop Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Acct-Session-Id = "396549219" Acct-Authentic = RADIUS Acct-Session-Time = 1 Acct-Input-Octets = 369 Acct-Output-Octets = 281 Acct-Input-Packets = 13 Acct-Output-Packets = 11 Ascend-Disconnect-Cause = unknown Ascend-Connect-Progress = prLanSessionUp Ascend-Data-Rate = 31200 Ascend-PreSession-Time = 23 Ascend-Pre-Input-Octets = 369 Ascend-Pre-Output-Octets = 275 Ascend-Pre-Input-Packets = 13 Ascend-Pre-Output-Packets = 10 Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 50667 Ascend-Multilink-ID = 2181694828 Ascend-Num-In-Multilink = 0 Acct-Link-Count = "<0><0><0><1>" Acct-Multi-Session-Id = "820a056c" Ascend-Modem-PortNo = 9 Ascend-Modem-SlotNo = 4 Ascend-Modem-ShelfNo = 1 Calling-Station-Id = "0512105529" Framed-Protocol = 262 Framed-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx *** Sending to xx.xx.xx.xx port 7020 .... Code: Accounting-Response ***************************************************** That's all. Session-Time shows that user was connected for one second only. thanks for kind help!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mhale at TOUA.net Mon Sep 9 16:58:51 2002 From: mhale at TOUA.net (Mike Hale) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX 4000 and radius psuedo profiles Message-ID: <2670BCE8B2BE3249A4A631B74D300985072990@arcroyal.hq.toua.net> We have a MAX 4000 running 7.0.4. We don't user psuedo user profiles in radius. In the TAOS manual it states: "To prevent the TAOS unit from sending requests for the configuration information stored in pseudo-user profiles, set Allow-Extern-Config-Rqsts to No in the Rad-Auth-Client subprofile of the External-Auth profile." However the manual is written for software version 8.0 and I can't seem to download a new version of the TAOS for our MAX 4000, the lucent website only allows the 4000 to upgrade to 7.0.4. The problem being that we don't have the Allow-Extern-Config-Rqsts option in 7.0.4. Is there another way to stop TAOS from asking for psuedo user profiles? They really clog up out logs. Michael Hale Network Engineer TOUA.net phone: 520-383-5849 fax: 520-383-2218 e-mail: mhale@toua.net web: http://www.toua.net/ From dcox at illicom.net Mon Sep 9 15:02:17 2002 From: dcox at illicom.net (Duane Cox) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) max 3048 Message-ID: <000901c2583b$cc400e60$15360f0a@NEBULA> Hello List I replaced a leaky battery in the max3048 (sanyo CR2450) with the exact same battery. And the unit worked before the battery replacement. But now the unit is dead and I get NO response from the console. At any baud rate. Also in NINDY mode, nothing from the console. Cry for HELP! Duane Cox ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From damin at nacs.net Tue Sep 10 12:02:28 2002 From: damin at nacs.net (Greg Boehnlein) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT / ISDN / MLPPP In-Reply-To: <2670BCE8B2BE3249A4A631B74D300985072990@arcroyal.hq.toua.net> Message-ID: Hello, I am looking at replacing a bank of PM-3 units and a DS-3 Mux with an Ascend Max TNT. The following configuration was provided to me by a used equipment vendor, and he couldn't answer the question to wether this unit would provide the following needs that I have: 1. Dial In/Out (ISDN, V.92) on all ports 2. Multi-Link PPP Support accross multiple ports. We occasionally do 256k ISDN connections for customers. 3. OSPF Routing TNT-H, 672 port 48DSP, v.92, VOIP, T3 -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST From tony at lava.net Tue Sep 10 14:32:45 2002 From: tony at lava.net (Antonio Querubin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? Message-ID: Is there an SNMP OID that tracks how many channels are in use in a given PRI or channelized T1 on an Ascend MAX 6000 or MAX 4000. I want to count channel usage per WAN port. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jim at top.net Tue Sep 10 16:05:32 2002 From: jim at top.net (Jim Logan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend Pipe/Max for Sale Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20020910160250.01454e10@mail.top.net> All Pipeline units have Firewall/IPSec, if applicable, and current version of AOS installed. Pipe50's (P50-1UBRI or UBRI-ASA): $ 125 Ea or Complete in open Box: $140 Pipe50's (P50-LS56): $ 70 Ea Pipe75's (P75-1UBRI or UBRI-ASA): $ 145 Ea Pipe75x25 (P75-1UBRI-X25): $ 125 Pipe75Sbri (P75S-ASA): $ 100 Pipe85's (P85-1UBRI): $ 135 Ea Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-V35): $ 175 Pipe130's (P130-LS56-2N-ASA): $ 175 Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-T1-ASA or FT1): $ 250 ea Pipe DSL Unit (Mdl: DSL-DMT): $ 100 Pipe DSL Unit (Mdl: DSL-Cell-50S): $ 100 Super Pipe 155 (SP155-T1-2U): $ 400 (Several) Max Stuff: Max 200 Plus, NIB, with PCMCIA Cards for the ISDN Ports: $ 100 Max MultiBand RPM: $ 95 Ea Max Multiband, PL-4BRI-STD: $ 125 Max Multiband, PL-1T1-STD: $ 125 Max 1800, Unit and Power Cord only: $ 400 Max 4004, MXHP-4T1-2 w/48 V.34 Modems: $ 250 Max V.34 Cards (MX-SL-8MOD-V34): $ 15 each TNT-SL-48MOD-S56 Cards: $ 250 ea All items guarentee'd 30 days, new items contain warranty cards and may have longer warranty from Lucent. All items in excellent/refurb condition if not new. Payments accepted via Credit Cards, COD via Fedex, and some established customers qualify for Net Accounts. All items available for immediate shipment. ******* Top Net InterNet Services ******** Omaha, Nebraska www.top.net Voice: (402) 960-1494 Fax: (402) 333-8383 Pager: (402) 977-2880 ******************************************* ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From jim at top.net Tue Sep 10 16:05:32 2002 From: jim at top.net (Jim Logan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:27 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) [isp-services] Ascend Pipe/Max for Sale Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20020910160250.01454e10@mail.top.net> All Pipeline units have Firewall/IPSec, if applicable, and current version of AOS installed. Pipe50's (P50-1UBRI or UBRI-ASA): $ 125 Ea or Complete in open Box: $140 Pipe50's (P50-LS56): $ 70 Ea Pipe75's (P75-1UBRI or UBRI-ASA): $ 145 Ea Pipe75x25 (P75-1UBRI-X25): $ 125 Pipe75Sbri (P75S-ASA): $ 100 Pipe85's (P85-1UBRI): $ 135 Ea Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-V35): $ 175 Pipe130's (P130-LS56-2N-ASA): $ 175 Pipe130's (P130-UBRI-T1-ASA or FT1): $ 250 ea Pipe DSL Unit (Mdl: DSL-DMT): $ 100 Pipe DSL Unit (Mdl: DSL-Cell-50S): $ 100 Super Pipe 155 (SP155-T1-2U): $ 400 (Several) Max Stuff: Max 200 Plus, NIB, with PCMCIA Cards for the ISDN Ports: $ 100 Max MultiBand RPM: $ 95 Ea Max Multiband, PL-4BRI-STD: $ 125 Max Multiband, PL-1T1-STD: $ 125 Max 1800, Unit and Power Cord only: $ 400 Max 4004, MXHP-4T1-2 w/48 V.34 Modems: $ 250 Max V.34 Cards (MX-SL-8MOD-V34): $ 15 each TNT-SL-48MOD-S56 Cards: $ 250 ea All items guarentee'd 30 days, new items contain warranty cards and may have longer warranty from Lucent. All items in excellent/refurb condition if not new. Payments accepted via Credit Cards, COD via Fedex, and some established customers qualify for Net Accounts. All items available for immediate shipment. ******* Top Net InterNet Services ******** Omaha, Nebraska www.top.net Voice: (402) 960-1494 Fax: (402) 333-8383 Pager: (402) 977-2880 ******************************************* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: isp-services-unsubscribe@ispc.org For additional commands, e-mail: isp-services-help@ispc.org ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From petercam1950 at netscape.net Wed Sep 11 06:20:38 2002 From: petercam1950 at netscape.net (Mr:Peter Campbell.) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) assistance Message-ID: <200209110420.VAA21759@max.bungi.com> ATTN: I PRESUME THIS MAIL WILL NOT BE A SURPRISE TO YOU. I AM AN ACCOUNTANT WITH THE MINISTRY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND ALSO A MEMBER OF CONTRACTS AWARDING COMMITTEE OF THIS MINISTRY UNDER SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT. MANY YEARS AGO, SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT ASKED THIS COMMITTEE TO AWARDS CONTRACTS TO FOREIGN FIRMS, WHICH I AND 2 OF MY PARTNERS ARE THE LEADER OF THIS COMMITTEE, WITH OUR GOOD POSITION , THIS CONTRACRS WAS OVER INVOICED TO THE TUNE OF US$21,500,000:00 AS A DEAL TO BE BENEFIT BY THE THREE TOP MEMBER OF THIS COMMITTEE. NOW THE CONTRACTS VALUE HAS BEEN PAID OFF TO THE ACTUAL CONTRACTORS THAT EXECUTED THIS JOBS, ALL WE WANT NOW IS A TRUSTED FOREIGN PARTNER LIKE YOU THAT WE SHALL FRONT WITH HIS BANKING ACCOUNT NUMBER TO CLAIM THE OVER INFLATED SUM. UPON OUR AGREEMEENT TO CARRY ON THIS TRANSACTION WITH YOU, THE SAID FUND WILL BE SHARE AS FOLLOWS. 75% WILL BE FOR US IN SOUTH AFRICA. 20% FOR USING YOUR ACCOUNT AND OTHER CONTRIBUTION THAT MIGHT REQIURED FROM YOU. 5% IS SET ASIDE FOR THE UP FRONT EXPENCES THAT WILL BE ENCOUNTER BY BOTH PARTY TO GET ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND FORMARLITIES THAT WILL JUSTIFY YOU AS THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF THIS FUND. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS TRANSACTION, KINDLY REPLY THIS MASSEGE WITH ALL YOUR PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS, OR MAIL ME THROUGH(petercamp1950@netscape.net) TO ENABLE US FURNISH YOU WITH DETAILS AND PROCEDURES OF THIS TRANSACTION. YOURS FAITHFULLY. Mr:Peter Campbell. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Tue Sep 10 23:47:25 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <007001c2594e$56d5f9a0$731ac518@psknet.com> The exact OID will vary depending on the version of TAOS you have. Walk these 2 OIDs to get the specifics for your boxes: 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.7 = B channels in use 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.13 = Total B channels Enjoy, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > Antonio Querubin > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:33 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? > > > Is there an SNMP OID that tracks how many channels are in use > in a given > PRI or channelized T1 on an Ascend MAX 6000 or MAX 4000. I > want to count > channel usage per WAN port. > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tony at lava.net Wed Sep 11 01:30:00 2002 From: tony at lava.net (Antonio Querubin) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? In-Reply-To: <007001c2594e$56d5f9a0$731ac518@psknet.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Troy Settle wrote: > The exact OID will vary depending on the version of TAOS you have. Walk > these 2 OIDs to get the specifics for your boxes: > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.7 = B channels in use > 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.13 = Total B channels These work great for our MAX 6000s running TAOS 8. Are there any equivalent OIDs for MAX 4000s running TAOS 7? ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From HKruell at swd-ag.de Wed Sep 11 08:35:37 2002 From: HKruell at swd-ag.de (HKruell@swd-ag.de) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) trunk group for cbcp callback Message-ID: Hello, can someone help me with cbcp please, now i have set "cbcp-trunk-group" and "cbcp-mode" in radius in every profile but can i set it globaly on a max-tnt ? thanks Heribert Kruell RemoteAccessAdministration Stadtwerke Duesseldorf AG Germany ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Wed Sep 11 09:49:19 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <007101c259a2$68fb9f50$731ac518@psknet.com> They are the same for the 4000. Check to see if SNMP is enabled on the box. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Antonio Querubin [mailto:tony@lava.net] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:30 AM > To: Troy Settle > Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) SNMP OID for circuit channel usage? > > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Troy Settle wrote: > > > The exact OID will vary depending on the version of TAOS > you have. Walk > > these 2 OIDs to get the specifics for your boxes: > > > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.7 = B channels in use > > 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.4.21.1.13 = Total B channels > > These work great for our MAX 6000s running TAOS 8. Are there any > equivalent OIDs for MAX 4000s running TAOS 7? > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From pommer at lanl.gov Thu Sep 12 10:35:24 2002 From: pommer at lanl.gov (Karl Pommer) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ? Max4002 Software Message-ID: <5.0.1.4.2.20020912093311.01f0f828@cic-mail.lanl.gov> Where is the current location to download system software for a MAX4002? Thanks, Karl Pommer TN: 505-665-1641 ------------------------------------ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Thu Sep 12 11:18:12 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ? Max4002 Software Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1DB@trinidad.solunet.com> It should be available at ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max. -----Original Message----- From: Karl Pommer [mailto:pommer@lanl.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:35 AM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Cc: pommer@lanl.gov Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ? Max4002 Software Where is the current location to download system software for a MAX4002? Thanks, Karl Pommer TN: 505-665-1641 ------------------------------------ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From tom at ispstuff.com Thu Sep 12 11:54:45 2002 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Cheap Max 6096 for sale - $1995.00 OBO Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20020912115445.03321730@mail.rockriver.net> I don't need now it as I am running everything through our Max TNT. In stock and looking for a good home. Max 6096 with 96 v.90 modems installed (6 - 16 port cards). All guaranteed. Tested, reconditioned and reset to factory defaults. Most options installed and the latest firmware installed. $1995.00 815-968-9888 or email. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Sep 12 14:02:31 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) ? Max4002 Software In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.2.20020912093311.01f0f828@cic-mail.lanl.gov> Message-ID: <000501c25a8e$f26b0130$23fbab3f@psknet.com> Karl, TAOS for the 4000 boxes is in the same place it's been since 1994: ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/ With the latest being at: ftp://ftp.ascend.com/pub/Software-Releases/Max/Release-7.0.X/7.0.28/ Good luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Karl Pommer > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:35 AM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Cc: pommer@lanl.gov > Subject: (ASCEND) ? Max4002 Software > > > Where is the current location to download system software for > a MAX4002? > > Thanks, Karl Pommer > TN: 505-665-1641 > ------------------------------------ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Sep 12 13:59:41 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MaxTNT SNMP OID for CNID? In-Reply-To: <200209120846.17517@-mixdown.ca> Message-ID: <000401c25a8e$8c99f0f0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.10.4.1.18.* snmpwalk is your friend. A better solution, would probably be to dump your radius accounting data into SQL and run some queries. SQL is much more efficient than SNMP for digging up this sort of information. Another solution, would be to attack the detail records with a perl script. Have fun, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > Kohlsmith > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:46 AM > To: ascend-users@bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) MaxTNT SNMP OID for CNID? > > > As the subject says, I'm looking for the SNMP OID to grab the > called number > (not calling number) id -- we have a DS3 split between two > access numbers and > I'd like to grab some stats as to who's callling which number. > > Regards, > Andrew > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From nsten at o1.com Thu Sep 12 15:05:26 2002 From: nsten at o1.com (Nicholas N. Sten) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend-Data-Filters and device load Message-ID: Has anyone been able to gauge the implications or impacts associated with the increased usage of Ascend-Data-Filter assignments to dial-up WAN sessions on Ascend (Lucent) MAX TNT and APX devices? In other words, at what point can I expect trouble on a MAX TNT if it is has 672 active dial-up WAN sessions and: * each user has been assigned a five-line data-filter via RADIUS? * each user has been assigned a ten-line data-filter via RADIUS? * each user has been assigned a fifteen-line data-filter via RADIUS? etc... -Nick ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From akohlsmith at benshaw.com Thu Sep 12 07:46:16 2002 From: akohlsmith at benshaw.com (Andrew Kohlsmith) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MaxTNT SNMP OID for CNID? Message-ID: <200209120846.17517@-mixdown.ca> As the subject says, I'm looking for the SNMP OID to grab the called number (not calling number) id -- we have a DS3 split between two access numbers and I'd like to grab some stats as to who's callling which number. Regards, Andrew ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From johamby at blomand.net Fri Sep 13 09:55:36 2002 From: johamby at blomand.net (Joe Hamby) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max 6000 upgrade problem Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020913094827.00aac5e0@mail.blomand.net> I have a Max 6000 that has been running on software 7.0.3 with no problems that I am aware of. I recently upgraded it to software version 8.0.4. As soon as it finished rebooting after the software upgrade the box is slow to respond in either a Telnet session or directly connected to the Console port. The box is used only for dial-up RAS. If the incoming trunk lines are disconnected or disabled then it seems to respond fine but connecting even one single T-1 back to the box makes the box almost unresponsive once traffic starts hitting it. I have compared the config line by line to another box with the same software load that is performing fine. The are identical. Has anyone seen this issue before? Thank You. Joe Hamby Ben Lomand Internet From olympio.lista at pratica.com.br Fri Sep 13 10:25:16 2002 From: olympio.lista at pratica.com.br (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Olympio_Renn=F3?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) MAX 4060 - FATAL ERROR: Index: 29 and 05 References: Message-ID: <000c01c25b39$c447d2a0$2445f6c8@pratica.com.br> Hi All, The Max 4060 still up 5 minutes and reset with erro failure 05 after this, auto reboot in loop with this message. In the diag (fatal command) the date change to 25/45/2065, afer cool reboot return to correct. I reload flash (tloadcode) with the last version, and the problem continue Who has some help ? Thanks Olympio Renn? FATAL ERROR: Index: 29 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 25/45/2065. Time: 45:85:85 Location: b00e5598 b011787c b0117940 b017caf4 b0055924 00000000 POST FAILURE: Index: 5 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 25/45/2065. Time: 45:85:85 Location: b01178e4 b017caf4 b0055924 00000000 00000000 00000000 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 09/13/2002. Time: 12:01:22 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From akohlsmith at benshaw.com Fri Sep 13 10:13:28 2002 From: akohlsmith at benshaw.com (Andrew Kohlsmith) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) MaxTNT SNMP OID for CNID? In-Reply-To: <000401c25a8e$8c99f0f0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> References: <000401c25a8e$8c99f0f0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> Message-ID: <200209131113.28217@-mixdown.ca> > 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.10.4.1.18.* Thanks! > A better solution, would probably be to dump your radius accounting data > into SQL and run some queries. SQL is much more efficient than SNMP for > digging up this sort of information. True... I was intending on hitting this with RRD and snmpget but I think doing it via SQL may be the better solution. Regards, Andrew ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From olympio.lista at pratica.com.br Fri Sep 13 14:29:08 2002 From: olympio.lista at pratica.com.br (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Olympio_Renn=F3?=) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX 4060 - FATAL ERROR: Index: 29 and 05 Message-ID: <002b01c25b5b$d66833e0$2445f6c8@pratica.com.br> Hi All, The Max 4060 still up 5 minutes and reset with erro failure 05 after this, auto reboot in loop with this message. In the diag (fatal command) the date change to 25/45/2065, afer cool reboot return to correct. I reload flash (tloadcode) with the last version, and the problem continue Who has some help ? Thanks Olympio Renn? FATAL ERROR: Index: 29 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 25/45/2065. Time: 45:85:85 Location: b00e5598 b011787c b0117940 b017caf4 b0055924 00000000 POST FAILURE: Index: 5 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 25/45/2065. Time: 45:85:85 Location: b01178e4 b017caf4 b0055924 00000000 00000000 00000000 SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: fewk.m40 Revision: 7.0.28 Date: 09/13/2002. Time: 12:01:22 From davedudd at ah163.com Fri Sep 13 23:20:53 2002 From: davedudd at ah163.com (davedudd) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:28 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) 中秋节快乐!!!! Message-ID: <200209140420.VAA08111@max.bungi.com> 尊敬的客户： 您好，即将迎来中秋佳节，公司预祝全体新老客户节日快乐！全家团圆！！特推 出中秋大优惠酬宾月： 国际域名 80元 国内域名 300元 网络实名　400元（直接敲入中文即可到达您的网站） 200M(纯HTML)送国际域名只需150元 60M(asp,access等)送域名和邮箱只需236元 200M(asp,access等)送域名和邮箱只需336元 网页制作，普通型企业网站，只需2000元。（功能多多，还赠送域名，空间及邮箱，全套服务15天即可完成） 更多......详见http://www.ondns.com 诚征全国代理，优惠多多。 请向QQ：1761020 MAIL：web@ondns.com索取代理价格表 我公司是一家专门致力于高新网络技术研究和开发的公司，有着多年的经验，在做虚拟主机方面我们 有着绝对的优势： ①直接接入广州国际骨干网2.5G，机房100M带宽共享； ②拥有一批高级的网络管理人员，主机由我们自己严格管理； ③对所有的网站内容我们都进行备份，并进行实时监控保证了其稳定性； 谢谢!　　 　　顺祝 商褀！ 百忙中打扰了您，深感抱歉。如不想收到此类邮件。请过滤拒收此邮件：daveddudd@ah163.com ============================================ 客户专员：肖先生 服务电话：0592-5557491和5557492 邮编：361009 传真：0592-5557491 http://www.ondns.com mail:web@ondns.com ============================================ --------------------------------------------------------------- 沸点群发邮件,来自软件工程专家网(http://www.21cmm.com) 进CMM网校(http://www.21cmm.com)，成项目管理专家 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From bt at wantoolbox.com Sat Sep 14 15:05:37 2002 From: bt at wantoolbox.com (bt@wantoolbox.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend ISDN Connection Trouble Message-ID: <20020914200537.8879.qmail@mail.wantoolbox.com> Hey guys, I have a small issue to deal with and I was looking for your help. Forgive me if this question has already been answered. I spent a few hours looking through your lists and have still not figured out the solution to my question. I'm fairly new to Ascend equipment so please be kind. Here goes... I have an Ascend 6096 with 2 16 bank modem cards tied to a PRI running TAOS 8.0.3. It has ISDN sig installed and data call enabled. All authentication requests for 28.8 - 56k modem dialup communication validate through or Radius server as necessary and connections are established. I now try to connect with an ISDN router using PAP. Our Ascend 6096 / and Radius server is configured for PAP. I try to connect to the 6096 via ISDN from a remote location. The message log displays the following: Assigned to port Call Connected Call Terminated (Total time is about 1/2 - 1 second) After this the connection ends and restarts with the same error as above. The show isdn command states the following: NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B1 NL: CALL CONNECTED B1 #9999999 NL: CALL CLEARED WITH CAUSE: 16 B1 #9999999 NL: ANSWER REQUEST: B3 (9999999 is the phone number I took out ours for obvious reaons) My first thoughts was an issue with Radius. My Radius server displays no error message of failed logins or any of the such. Which I thought was quite strange. So I went ahead and did a tcpdump on the Radius Server...stranger yet...the radius server is not even getting any information during the login process. So we are stuck back at square one... We get connected... We get our port... We get disconnected... We never authenticate through this process. Possible senerios we have come up with... 1. The auth time is too short for the ISDN to authenticate...how do I lengthen this? And if this is the case why does 56k authenticate? 2. PAP will not work for some reason? This dialup router has been used in the past with PAP though so this reason is quite possibly out of the question, unless there is some issue I am not aware of with . 3. A Telco Problem? We have called them. They have stated there is nothing wrong with the line. They are doing more testing tomarrow to verify. (still up in the air) 4. For some strange reason unknown, it drops all ISDN connections once it realizes they are a data call? Seeing that 56k access works perfectly this is something that makes sense but in theory only...seeing that we have no clue how to verify this. Any help would be great guys. Thanks for reading. -Kyle bt@wantoolbox.com ps The ISDN Router we are using is a cisco 804. It has been used to connect to 3 other ISPS with no issues. From mfrater at quicksilver.co.nz Sun Sep 15 20:01:01 2002 From: mfrater at quicksilver.co.nz (Mark Frater) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options Message-ID: <001101c25d1c$86a62ca0$0a8259ca@quicksilver.co.nz> Hi List, If you swap the Shelf controllers between two TNTs, do all the enabled features follow the SC and work ok with a new chassis or are the enabled features dependent upon chassis serial number? Mark From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Sep 16 14:29:56 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1EC@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Mark, Usually the SCM and the chassis match up. In cases where this is not true, due to swapping, the features follow the SCM and the S/N of the SCM is what shows up on a 'get base' and is what is used for 'hashed' features/options. Hope this helps, - David -----Original Message----- From: Mark Frater [mailto:mfrater@quicksilver.co.nz] Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 9:01 PM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options Hi List, If you swap the Shelf controllers between two TNTs, do all the enabled features follow the SC and work ok with a new chassis or are the enabled features dependent upon chassis serial number? Mark From info at qualitek.net Mon Sep 16 15:23:07 2002 From: info at qualitek.net (Qualitek) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options In-Reply-To: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1EC@trinidad.solunet.com> Message-ID: Hello Mark, We've sold 100's of TNT's and never had a problem mixing the chassis serial# with a different shelf serial#. Regards, Sean Bennett, CEO Qualitek Services, Inc. www.Qualitek.Net 2215 Ringwood Ave. San Jose, CA 95131 PH: 408.597.0130 FX: 408.597.0131 -----Original Message----- From: rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com [mailto:rte-ascend-admin@lists.real-time.com]On Behalf Of DPascarella@solunet.com Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:30 PM To: mfrater@quicksilver.co.nz; rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options Hi Mark, Usually the SCM and the chassis match up. In cases where this is not true, due to swapping, the features follow the SCM and the S/N of the SCM is what shows up on a 'get base' and is what is used for 'hashed' features/options. Hope this helps, - David -----Original Message----- From: Mark Frater [mailto:mfrater@quicksilver.co.nz] Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 9:01 PM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] TNT enabled features / options Hi List, If you swap the Shelf controllers between two TNTs, do all the enabled features follow the SC and work ok with a new chassis or are the enabled features dependent upon chassis serial number? Mark _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From ahmiqs at yahoo.com Mon Sep 16 15:41:08 2002 From: ahmiqs at yahoo.com (Ahmiq Singh) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Maxtnt command to check CPU and Memory load Message-ID: <20020916204108.78284.qmail@web12106.mail.yahoo.com> Is there any command and if possible can i get some oid to draw graphs??? 2: is there nay possible filter to redirect all port 80 traffic to some specific ip i.e Transparent proxy. Thanx ===== Schahzad Zafar Choudhry System Administrator Brain NET NWFP Pakistan 0300-8405143 __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From rydrcom at yahoo.com Mon Sep 16 16:08:29 2002 From: rydrcom at yahoo.com (Ryder Communications) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) For Sale: TNT, CBX, B-STDX Message-ID: <20020916210829.55590.qmail@web14311.mail.yahoo.com> RYDRCOM has an extensive inventory of Ascend equipment that we are looking to clear out of our warehouse. If you have any interest in any equipment, send me an email and I will forward you a list of what is available. Thanks, Brian Braisted RYDRCOM (877) 793-7266 x227 brian@rydrcom.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From hartala80 at hotmail.com Wed Sep 18 03:04:27 2002 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) searching for TNT Message-ID: Dear All pls I'm searching for MAX TNT with the following feature 1-R2 Signaling hash code 2-Network Management hash code with the following cards : 1- 2 E1-cards TNT-SL-CE1-C 2- 5 APX8-SL-96DSP 3- TNT-SL-E100ND-C or TNT-SLE100-V-C with the dongle if any one have the above requirement pls contact me . thx _________________________________________________________________ Join the world抯 largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Wed Sep 18 08:51:30 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max 6000 upgrade problem Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B1F7@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Joe, Have you noticed any fatal errors in the history log since you upgraded. Also, you may want to run a syslog server for the MAX and see what pops up in there. It sounds like a software/hardware error that is hijacking CPU processes. Sometimes, when this happens, you will see a fatal 1 or 2 in the history log. If you DO see those specific errors, I'd recommend reloading your current TAOS rev. or upgrading to a 9.0.x. Even if all else fails, you may want to upgrade, anyway as a last resort. It may not be an issue with that specific code rev, but rather that it is somehow corrupted and is causing problems. Have Fun, - David -----Original Message----- From: Joe Hamby [mailto:johamby@blomand.net] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 10:56 AM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] Max 6000 upgrade problem I have a Max 6000 that has been running on software 7.0.3 with no problems that I am aware of. I recently upgraded it to software version 8.0.4. As soon as it finished rebooting after the software upgrade the box is slow to respond in either a Telnet session or directly connected to the Console port. The box is used only for dial-up RAS. If the incoming trunk lines are disconnected or disabled then it seems to respond fine but connecting even one single T-1 back to the box makes the box almost unresponsive once traffic starts hitting it. I have compared the config line by line to another box with the same software load that is performing fine. The are identical. Has anyone seen this issue before? Thank You. Joe Hamby Ben Lomand Internet _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From rjb at worldnetoh.com Thu Sep 19 06:36:06 2002 From: rjb at worldnetoh.com (Robert) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] WTB Max 6000 E1 Chassis Message-ID: <00cd01c25fd0$beb58a80$0a01a8c0@worldnetoh.com> Let me know if you have any, or know of any, for sale - any quantity. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20020919/ca3fb193/attachment.html From tom at ispstuff.com Sun Sep 22 08:52:19 2002 From: tom at ispstuff.com (ISPstuff) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20020922085219.01af8b70@mail.rockriver.net> Anybody have some detail that they can point me to for Max 1800 Nindy procedure? I was trying to re-intialize the password on one and went into Nindy mode, did an ef (for erase flash) thinking that it was just erasing passwords but it appears to have erased TAOS. Now it is trying to load a new flash image. I am not sure what image I need to send and the filename I should be sending. Over the serial monitor port? Help would be appreciated. Thanks, Tom ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Sep 22 10:15:21 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20020922085219.01af8b70@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <000701c2624a$de4a7a00$2615c518@psknet.com> Tom, It looks like 7.0.26 or 7.2.4 is the code you want. The file would be fbi.m18 or fbik.m18 depending on wether you're putting modems in it or not. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of ISPstuff > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:52 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? > > > Anybody have some detail that they can point me to for Max 1800 Nindy > procedure? > > I was trying to re-intialize the password on one and went > into Nindy mode, > did an ef (for erase flash) thinking that it was just erasing > passwords but > it appears to have erased TAOS. Now it is trying to load a > new flash image. > > I am not sure what image I need to send and the filename I should be > sending. > > Over the serial monitor port? > > Help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Tom > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Sep 22 10:14:37 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20020922085219.01af8b70@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <001301c2624a$c5ffe8e0$2615c518@psknet.com> Tom, It looks like 7.0.26 or 7.2.4 is the code you want. The file would be fbi.m18 or fbik.m18 depending on wether you're putting modems in it or not. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of ISPstuff > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:52 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? > > > Anybody have some detail that they can point me to for Max 1800 Nindy > procedure? > > I was trying to re-intialize the password on one and went > into Nindy mode, > did an ef (for erase flash) thinking that it was just erasing > passwords but > it appears to have erased TAOS. Now it is trying to load a > new flash image. > > I am not sure what image I need to send and the filename I should be > sending. > > Over the serial monitor port? > > Help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Tom > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From magic at area-net.com Sun Sep 22 14:28:23 2002 From: magic at area-net.com (Terry Lee, Publisher) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Modems Message-ID: <004d01c2626e$375a61f0$cbe6160c@areanet.com> Friends, I have a couple of MAXen that are flagging many modems as "Suspect Modems" due to some kind of errors occuring on the trunks that is cutting calls off. It seems that these modems, once marked as suspect, are not available for use by the MAX, resulting in busy signals. Is there a quick & easy way to reset the "Suspect Modem" flags, or at least let the MAX assign these modems in spite of their status? Thank you. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Sun Sep 22 16:14:56 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems Message-ID: <000801c2627d$1a812320$2615c518@psknet.com> All, I've got a TNT with 96 port DSP cards running TAOS 9.0.2. The box itself seems to be fine, but I have a rather large number of customers that are having problems getting connected at a decent speed. A typical customer will try 2-3 times to get online. The first 1 or 2 attempts will result in a connect speed of 1200. The final attempt will result in a connect speed of 19200 to 26400, and a V90 speed of 48-54k. Once connected, they will typically be able to stay online for hours at a time. Any suggestions as to what to look for to find the trouble? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From bryanbl at triton.net Sun Sep 22 16:57:08 2002 From: bryanbl at triton.net (Bryan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Multiple ip interfaces / PPP connections Message-ID: <02de01c26282$ff4aadf0$340bacd1@ext> Hello all, Is it possible to override ip-globals system-ip-addr profile, to spread default routes across 3 different ip-interfaces for dial in PPP connections? ( each ip-interface would have 2-3 /24 pools). My concern is that every connection will have the same default route of the ip-globals system ip address. I have tried Vrouters for each ip-interface - with no luck. When a call will initiate, it will not assign an IP from the vrouters dial-up pool. I have also tried binding a connection profile to a given vrouter, as well as multiple ip-routes for each dial-in pool w/ inter-vrouter set accordingly. I don't necessarily have to use vrouters and have a separate routing table per interface, I would just like to simply have pool-1-3 go out x interface. using an APX 8000 btw. thanks in advance bryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20020922/1be334a7/attachment.htm From bryanbl at triton.net Sun Sep 22 16:47:00 2002 From: bryanbl at triton.net (Bryan) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (no subject) Message-ID: <02bc01c26281$9518aa00$340bacd1@ext> Hello all, Is it possible to override ip-globals system-ip-addr profile, to spread default routes across 3 different ip-interfaces for dial in PPP connections? ( each ip-interface would have 2-3 /24 pools). My concern is that every connection will have the same default route of the ip-globals system ip address. I have tried Vrouters for each ip-interface - with no luck. When a call will initiate, it will not assign an IP from the vrouters dial-up pool. I have also tried binding a connection profile to a given vrouter, as well as multiple ip-routes for each dial-in pool w/ inter-vrouter set accordingly. I don't necessarily have to use vrouters and have a separate routing table per interface, I would just like to simply have pool-1-3 go out x interface. using an APX 8000 btw. thanks in advance bryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20020922/e827c81b/attachment.html From troy at psknet.com Sun Sep 22 16:42:55 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems Message-ID: <000901c26281$04f9faf0$2615c518@psknet.com> Bad form to reply to one's own post, but I just dug some real stats out of my radius detail records. I have 2 TNT units, each located in a different city, each colocated with a CLEC, both connected to a 5ESS via a DS3 to the DACS(sp?). Both are running TAOS 9.0.2, both have 96 port DSP cards, both serve about the same number of customers. But, one is having major issues, the other is not. The one that is having issues did not have any when I was running it with DS1s from the ILEC. TNT1 TNT2 Calls: 127640 171494 Logins: 117681 (92.2%) 96444 (56.2%) 30/185: 101 (0.00%) 32694 (19.1%) 0 baud: 5503 (0.43%) 16637 (9.70%) Where do I begin to troubleshoot this? I can't afford to replace this unit just to test it. And I certainly can't afford to let it keep going like it is. Any suggestions on what I can do here? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:15 PM > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > Subject: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems > > > > All, > > I've got a TNT with 96 port DSP cards running TAOS 9.0.2. > > The box itself seems to be fine, but I have a rather large > number of customers that are having problems getting > connected at a decent speed. > > A typical customer will try 2-3 times to get online. The > first 1 or 2 attempts will result in a connect speed of 1200. > The final attempt will result in a connect speed of 19200 to > 26400, and a V90 speed of 48-54k. Once connected, they will > typically be able to stay online for hours at a time. > > Any suggestions as to what to look for to find the trouble? > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From eric at cirr.com Sun Sep 22 17:36:10 2002 From: eric at cirr.com (Eric Schnoebelen) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) nindy Max 1800? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:52:19 CDT." <3.0.3.32.20020922085219.01af8b70@mail.rockriver.net> Message-ID: <200209222236.g8MMaA825115@egsner.cirr.com> ISPstuff writes: - Anybody have some detail that they can point me to for Max 1800 Nindy - procedure? Sure do (having had to nindy about five in the last year.. - I am not sure what image I need to send and the filename I should - be sending. You want to send up one of the restricted images. I have rbi.m18 and rbik.m18 on my tftp server for this purpose. - Over the serial monitor port? Yes. Xmodem/Ymodem is used, and 57.6kbps n/8/1. Once you've got the restricted load into flash, you can pull the nindy jumper, and reboot it. There is now enough OS on the system to allow it to connect to the network, and download the image you really want to use. -- Eric Schnoebelen eric@cirr.com http://www.cirr.com "We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs." -- Mike Andrews in ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Sep 23 09:02:43 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Modems Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B222@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Terry, Typically, 'suspect' modems are placed on the virtual 'bottom' of the modem list to be used as a last resort. That is, only when all other available modems are in use, will the MAX route calls to a 'suspect' modem. You shouldn't get a busy signal from this if the modem(s) are not dead or disabled. If you have T1's and are specifying a channel to be routed to the modem slot where the suspect modem exists, you may want to change 'slot = n' where 'n' is a modem slot without any suspect, dead, or disabled modems. Disregard if you have PRI's. I had a recent case where someone had a 3048 with 2 T1's and a modem went 'bad'. So he manually disabled it but did not disable one of the channels to prevent a 'channel > modem' configuration. Subsequently, the 3048 would try to route the 48th available channel to the 'disabled' modem, anyway, and he would see CRC's skyrocket and the call fail. Strange but true. Why the MAX would still route a call to a disabled modem, I have no idea. When he disable 1 channel, his problem disappeared. Also, to reset the modem's status, you may want to disable and re-enable the modem slot that contains the suspect modems and recheck the list. Or, if that fails to clear it, reset the MAX during an available maintenance window. Hope this helps, David Pascarella Solunet TAC www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Terry Lee, Publisher [mailto:magic@area-net.com] Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 3:28 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Modems Friends, I have a couple of MAXen that are flagging many modems as "Suspect Modems" due to some kind of errors occuring on the trunks that is cutting calls off. It seems that these modems, once marked as suspect, are not available for use by the MAX, resulting in busy signals. Is there a quick & easy way to reset the "Suspect Modem" flags, or at least let the MAX assign these modems in spite of their status? Thank you. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Sep 23 10:30:12 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection P roblems Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B226@trinidad.solunet.com> Hi Troy, Have you had the DS3 going to TNT2 tested or monitored? Any FDL stats or Error Events? If code and config are 'apples/apples', and the only thing that has changed is going from DS1 circuits to DS3 circuits, I would like to rule out the circuit to TNT2. Then, rule out DSP's secondly. Are there any common denominators at the user end? I don't suppose you have a spare DS3 module laying around, eh? ;-) Just my $.02. David Pascarella Solunet TAC www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:43 PM To: ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems Bad form to reply to one's own post, but I just dug some real stats out of my radius detail records. I have 2 TNT units, each located in a different city, each colocated with a CLEC, both connected to a 5ESS via a DS3 to the DACS(sp?). Both are running TAOS 9.0.2, both have 96 port DSP cards, both serve about the same number of customers. But, one is having major issues, the other is not. The one that is having issues did not have any when I was running it with DS1s from the ILEC. TNT1 TNT2 Calls: 127640 171494 Logins: 117681 (92.2%) 96444 (56.2%) 30/185: 101 (0.00%) 32694 (19.1%) 0 baud: 5503 (0.43%) 16637 (9.70%) Where do I begin to troubleshoot this? I can't afford to replace this unit just to test it. And I certainly can't afford to let it keep going like it is. Any suggestions on what I can do here? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 5:15 PM > To: 'ascend-users@bungi.com' > Subject: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems > > > > All, > > I've got a TNT with 96 port DSP cards running TAOS 9.0.2. > > The box itself seems to be fine, but I have a rather large > number of customers that are having problems getting > connected at a decent speed. > > A typical customer will try 2-3 times to get online. The > first 1 or 2 attempts will result in a connect speed of 1200. > The final attempt will result in a connect speed of 19200 to > 26400, and a V90 speed of 48-54k. Once connected, they will > typically be able to stay online for hours at a time. > > Any suggestions as to what to look for to find the trouble? > > > -- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > http://www.psknet.com > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mallen116 at hotmail.com Tue Sep 24 01:53:10 2002 From: mallen116 at hotmail.com (mallen116@hotmail.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) ENLARGE YOUR ***** - SATISFY YOUR PARTNER Message-ID: <0000343a1401$000034d8$000062ca@mx2.hotmail.com> "Want a BIG ******* Experience the results you've always wanted with a MASSIVE scientific breakthrough: Our Doctor-Approved Pill Will Actually Expand, Lengthen And Enlarge Your ****** 100% GUARANTEED! WE GUARANTEE GENUINE LASTING RESULTS! OUR METHOD WILL WORK FOR YOU 100%, OR YOU GET 100% OF YOUR MONEY BACK! FOR MORE?INFORMATION PLEASE Go To: http://www.mnaps.com And scroll down to ENLARGE YOUR ***** - Satisfy your partner. *************************************************************************** If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please go to http://www.gghos.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From angelq33177054v70 at aol.com Wed Sep 25 04:20:20 2002 From: angelq33177054v70 at aol.com (angelq33177054v70@aol.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) How are you! 8787BVQo2-202O-13 Message-ID: <035c12d38d5d$6473a6b3$5ed64ea7@fkygex> Hey sexy its me Julie. Where have you been . I've been tring to get hold of you for such a long time now. You have to come check out my new site its called juliescove.com Come check it out we can chat there. Later Julie 6554iRxD4-403QlTB7127mGiX2-548smYY29l34 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From adultmatchnetwork4872r85 at easy.com Wed Sep 25 02:47:58 2002 From: adultmatchnetwork4872r85 at easy.com (adultmatchnetwork4872r85@easy.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Whats Up 9622SIPU9-5-10 Message-ID: <008e20a26a2a$4233c2e1$5dd44cc7@jowodg> Hey Its Julie. How have you been? Everything going good? I have been so busy lately but I did update my site www.julieswebpage.com I have all kinds of new things. Hope to see you online soon!!! 00l2 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From everhausmann at wilhelp.com Tue Sep 24 15:41:34 2002 From: everhausmann at wilhelp.com (everhausmann@wilhelp.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) What do you think of my new pics Message-ID: <014a14e53d3b$1867c7c5$2bd05ba6@pwhtse> Hey Sexy! Whats shakn.... You have to check these pics out... They are the naughtiest ones I've taken.. I hope you like them.. http://www.seemyhomepage.com 5976XEtm8-765uvhK9063LBoc5-984eziU2578JIaP2-996tvoN4172JMWr2-53l59 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ANoriega at prima.com.ar Thu Sep 26 14:44:52 2002 From: ANoriega at prima.com.ar (Noriega, Alejandro) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String Message-ID: > Hello guys, > I was verifying the config on my MaxTNT and I discovered the possibility of set an Init String. I'm familiarized with Cisco ASs and on this line I have documentation about Init Strings but I didn't find any documentation about MaxTNT Init Strings or examples. > > I'm running software versionm 9.0.9 > Can anybody help on it? > > Thanks. > > Alejandro. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20020926/2b0cd948/attachment.htm From ANoriega at prima.com.ar Thu Sep 26 15:32:02 2002 From: ANoriega at prima.com.ar (Noriega, Alejandro) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String Message-ID: To force the dial-in connections to module V34 only for example :-) But for your answer I notify that isn't usual to use Init String on MaxTNTs... I have to bigs headache with MaxTNT: One was the information about Init String Two the way yo set the ds0s of my E1 to maintenance mode. I only saw this option on T1!! Anyone familiarized with E1 configs? -----Original Message----- From: Nicholas N. Sten [mailto:nsten@o1.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:26 PM To: Noriega, Alejandro; rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String Init string for what? -Nick -----Original Message----- From: Noriega, Alejandro [mailto:ANoriega@prima.com.ar] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:45 PM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String Importance: High Hello guys, I was verifying the config on my MaxTNT and I discovered the possibility of set an Init String. I'm familiarized with Cisco ASs and on this line I have documentation about Init Strings but I didn't find any documentation about MaxTNT Init Strings or examples. I'm running software versionm 9.0.9 Can anybody help on it? Thanks. Alejandro. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20020926/e6ea4a85/attachment.html From hartala80 at hotmail.com Mon Sep 30 02:51:59 2002 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:30 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String Message-ID: Hi Alejandro can you pls point out what do u mean by maintenance mode , may i could help you ? thx >From: "Noriega, Alejandro" >To: "Nicholas N. Sten" , >Subject: RE: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:32:02 -0300 > >To force the dial-in connections to module V34 only for example :-) >But for your answer I notify that isn't usual to use Init String on >MaxTNTs... > >I have to bigs headache with MaxTNT: > One was the information about Init String > Two the way yo set the ds0s of my E1 to maintenance mode. I only >saw this option on T1!! > >Anyone familiarized with E1 configs? > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Nicholas N. Sten [mailto:nsten@o1.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:26 PM >To: Noriega, Alejandro; rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com >Subject: RE: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String > > >Init string for what? > >-Nick > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Noriega, Alejandro [mailto:ANoriega@prima.com.ar] >Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:45 PM >To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com >Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT Init String >Importance: High > > > >Hello guys, > I was verifying the config on my MaxTNT and I discovered the >possibility of set an Init String. I'm familiarized with Cisco ASs and on >this line I have documentation about Init Strings but I didn't find any >documentation about MaxTNT Init Strings or examples. > >I'm running software versionm 9.0.9 >Can anybody help on it? > >Thanks. > >Alejandro. > Rgrds Emad Anis Data Communication Engineer LINKdotNET www.link.net _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com From ahmetk at intrakets.com.tr Mon Sep 30 05:23:17 2002 From: ahmetk at intrakets.com.tr (Ahmet KALAYCI) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] lucent products Message-ID: <000001c2686b$78c4fbc0$630aa8c0@ahmet> Dear All, We have the following brand new units on stock. Please call/email us, in case you are interested. Best Regards, DSL-HST-E DSLMX20-AC DMX-SL-E1 DMX-SL-SDSLH16 DMX-SL-SDSLH8 APX8-AC (-R Model) APX8-SL-96DSP TNT-SL-E100-V-C TNT-SL-CE1- C(O) TNT-SL-E10-100 TNT-AC-H LMF BRICK 80 LMF BRICK 201 and more Z.Selma Levent INTRAKets Ltd. ?ti. Ko?uyolu Cad. No:65 81020 Kadikoy ISTANBUL Tel : + 90 216 327 69 30 (PBX) Fax : + 90 216 327 69 24 www.intrakets.com.tr From troy at psknet.com Mon Sep 30 08:21:46 2002 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Caller ID and TNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000801c26884$54cda410$2615c518@psknet.com> Do you see the caller ID when watching the call log? Use the log command and see. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 http://www.psknet.com > -----Original Message----- > From: niblettda@gru.com [mailto:niblettda@gru.com] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:22 AM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Cc: troy@psknet.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Caller ID and TNT > > > I wish that was the case, but I put a sniffer on the segment > that has the TNT, and there is absolutely no information > coming from the TNT with CallerID in it. > > My Radius (RadiusNT) reports all values it gets, even the > ones that it doesn't know about in the dictionary, by number. > number 31 (CallerID) is never among them. > > In case it helps, I'm using a CT3 card for the PRI's, going > to 96 port modem cards. That's all that I have in the chassis. > > Thanks! > > -- > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 1:05 PM > > To: niblettda@gru.com; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Caller ID and TNT > > > > > > > > David, > > > > In my experience, the TNT will include all available > > information in it's > > accounting data. If the callerid information shows up in > syslog, but > > not in radius accounting, then you might want to check your radius > > server to see why it's getting dropped. > > > > Good luck, > > > > -- > > Troy Settle > > Pulaski Networks > > 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > > http://www.psknet.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > > > niblettda@gru.com > > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:25 AM > > > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Caller ID and TNT > > > > > > > > > I hope some are still out there reading this list. > > > > > > I've got a MaxTNT that I'm trying to get CallerID out of. > > > I can see in the syslog output that the TNT is getting the > > > CallerID. I know the Telco is sending the CallerID (since > > > I'm the Telco). > > > > > > My issue is that I don't receive the CallerID information > > > in the Radius Accounting packet. I don't think that this > > > has anything to do with my Radius implementation since the > > > data isn't ever sent from the TNT to the Radius server. > > > Once I actually get the data, then I can troubleshoot the > > > server portion. > > > > > > I do not want to Caller ID authentication, I just want to > > > capture the caller's number for future reference. > > > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > I'm running TAOS v9.0.2. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > David A. Niblett | eMail: niblettda@gru.net > > > Network Administrator | Phone: (352) 334-3400 > > > Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/ > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > > > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > > > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > > > > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From cuong.tran at dsto.defence.gov.au Mon Sep 30 19:55:07 2002 From: cuong.tran at dsto.defence.gov.au (cuong tran) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Does not accept call References: Message-ID: <004b01c268e5$30e7eae0$7595fea9@dsto.defence.gov.au> Hi all, My Ascend MAX2000 does not accept any call, since my Telstra Microlink upgraded to ONRAMP 30. I am currently running version 6.0 on my ASCEND MAX2000. Do I need to upgrade my software ? Does anyone has the same problem ? Many Thanks Cuong Tran From Tstken at cs.com Mon Sep 30 21:24:52 2002 From: Tstken at cs.com (Tstken@cs.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) (no subject) Message-ID: <37.2e221cc5.2aca6174@cs.com> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ascndusr at mail.davlin.net Mon Sep 23 09:07:34 2002 From: ascndusr at mail.davlin.net (David Routh) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Archives? Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20020923090734.007a97b0@mail.davlin.net> Hello, Where are the mailing list archives located? The link at the bottom of each message points to: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/... Which takes you to: http://www.nextrieve.com... and I couldn't find any ascend-users archives... Can someone point me in the right direction. Thanks, David ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From magic at area-net.com Mon Sep 23 09:18:30 2002 From: magic at area-net.com (Terry Lee, Publisher) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Modems Message-ID: <00be01c2630c$174f8540$cbe6160c@areanet.com> Thanks David, Yes your statements below have been verified by last night's experience. The previous night I was gettting busy signals although I had what appeared to be a lot of free modems. When I opened the "Modem Pools" window in NavisAccess I noticed that the modems listed as "Suspect" were subtracted from the row of "Available Modems", so naturally I figured "Suspect" modems were somehow being made unavailable and that that was the cause of the busys. Apparently the busys were another issue because last night I had so many modems marked suspect (due to ongoing telco issues) that the "Available modems" columns all had big fat zeros in them, yet no busys were encountered. Obviously just a bad choice of column headings for Ascend in the Modem Pools applet. -Terry **************************************************************************** ******** Hi Terry, Typically, 'suspect' modems are placed on the virtual 'bottom' of the modem list to be used as a last resort. That is, only when all other available modems are in use, will the MAX route calls to a 'suspect' modem. You shouldn't get a busy signal from this if the modem(s) are not dead or disabled. If you have T1's and are specifying a channel to be routed to the modem slot where the suspect modem exists, you may want to change 'slot = n' where 'n' is a modem slot without any suspect, dead, or disabled modems. Disregard if you have PRI's. I had a recent case where someone had a 3048 with 2 T1's and a modem went 'bad'. So he manually disabled it but did not disable one of the channels to prevent a 'channel > modem' configuration. Subsequently, the 3048 would try to route the 48th available channel to the 'disabled' modem, anyway, and he would see CRC's skyrocket and the call fail. Strange but true. Why the MAX would still route a call to a disabled modem, I have no idea. When he disable 1 channel, his problem disappeared. Also, to reset the modem's status, you may want to disable and re-enable the modem slot that contains the suspect modems and recheck the list. Or, if that fails to clear it, reset the MAX during an available maintenance window. Hope this helps, David Pascarella Solunet TAC www.solunet.com -----Original Message----- From: Terry Lee, Publisher [mailto:magic@area-net.com] Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 3:28 PM To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Suspect Modems Friends, I have a couple of MAXen that are flagging many modems as "Suspect Modems" due to some kind of errors occuring on the trunks that is cutting calls off. It seems that these modems, once marked as suspect, are not available for use by the MAX, resulting in busy signals. Is there a quick & easy way to reset the "Suspect Modem" flags, or at least let the MAX assign these modems in spite of their status? Thank you. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From naminda at sltnet.lk Mon Sep 30 15:30:57 2002 From: naminda at sltnet.lk (naminda) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] MAX TNT Message-ID: Dear all, we are using MAX TNT with TAOS 8.0.5.Our dial up customers complain that they get disconnected.ANy one know how to check the cause? And also we noticed that MAX TNT is very slow when we try to telnet(this TNT has 480 subscribers connected).Does anyone have an idea. thanks Naminda E/NWII SLT From DPascarella at solunet.com Mon Sep 23 14:41:28 2002 From: DPascarella at solunet.com (DPascarella@solunet.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection P roblems Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0E3B233@trinidad.solunet.com> Sure. It's sounds like you have a bead on it, already. Be sure to let us know. (curious) Thanks, - David -----Original Message----- From: Troy Settle [mailto:troy@psknet.com] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:59 AM To: DPascarella@solunet.com; ascend-users@bungi.com Subject: RE: [Ascend] (ASCEND) RE: TNT - 9.0.2 - DSP Modems - Connection Problems David, The DS3 isn't taking any errors. As far as I can tell, the circuit between the DACS and CPE is flawless. The DS1s were from a different phone company. This chassis itself is known to be good, as it was in production for about 9 months before I switched from the ILEC to the CLEC. The DS3 card is also known to be good (I pulled it myself from the other chassis after moving the PRI from a MUX to a regular DS3). On the customer side, we're talking about several hundred customers that were dialing into 6000's and 4000's without issue (7.0.26). After porting our access numbers to a CLEC and taking our PRI over DS3 into the TNT (9.0.2), these problems started occurring. Please see Terry's post (which you also replied to). We just cut him over from the ILEC to the CLEC last week, and he noticed the problems immediately (same equipment and config). Unforutnately, he doesn't have enough historical data to show what's going on. I've got one other ISP that I'm hoping will be able to provide additional info for us to take to the table. Laying between the ILEC's tandem and the CLEC, is a DS3 from a local fiber carrier. I guess we really need to look towards the trunking between telcos to find out what's going on. -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mjohnson32 at 37.com Tue Sep 24 13:29:25 2002 From: mjohnson32 at 37.com (Johnson Mowete) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Urgent Assistance Message-ID: <200209241830.g8OIURd28930@sprite.real-time.com> TEL:+31-641-229-662 CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL You may be surprised to receive this letter from me since you do not know me personally. The purpose of my introduction is that I am Johnson Mowete, the first son of Frank Mowete ,the most popular black farmer in Zimbabwe who was recently murdered in the land dispute in my country. I got your contact through network online hence decided to write you. Before the death of my father, he had taken me to Johannesburg to deposit the sum of US8.5 million (Eight million, Five Hundred thousand United States dollars), in one of the private security company, as he foresaw the looming danger in Zimbabwe this money was deposited in a box as gem stones to avoid much demurrage from security company.This amount was meant for the purchase of new machines and chemicals for the Farms and establishment of new farms in Swaziland. This land problem came when Zimbabwean President Mr.Robert Mugabe introduced a new Land Act Reform wholly affecting the rich white farmers and some few black farmers, and this resulted to the killing and mob action by Zimbabwean war veterans and some lunatics in the society. In fact a lot of people were killed because of this Land reform Act for which my father was one of the victims. It is against this background that, I and my family fled Zimbabwe for fear of our lives and are currently staying in the Netherlands where we are seeking political asylum and moreso have decided to transfer my father?s money to a more reliable foreign account. since the law of Netherlands prohibits a refugee (asylum seeker) to open any bank account or to be involved in any financial transaction throughout the territorial zone of Netherlands, As the eldest son of my father, I am saddled with the responsibility of seeking a genuine foreign account where this money could be transferred without the knowledge of my government who are bent on taking everything we have got. The South African government seems to be playing along with them. I am faced with the dilemma of moving this amount of money out of South Africa for fear of going through the same experience in future, both countries have similar political history. As a businessman,I am seeking for a partner who I have to entrust my future and that of my family in his hands, I must let you know that this transaction is risk free. If you accept to assist me and my family, all I want you to do for me, is to make an arrangements with the security company to clear the consignment(funds) from their afiliate office here in the Netherlands as i have already given directives for the consignment to be brought to the Netherlands from South Africa.But before then all modalities will have to be put in place like change of ownership to the consignment and more importantly this money I intend to use for investment. I have two options for you. Firstly you can choose to have certain percentage of the money for nominating your account for this transaction. Or you can go into partnership with me for the proper profitable investment of the money in your country. Whichever the option you want, feel free to notify me. I have also mapped out 5% of this money for all kinds of expenses incurred in the process of this transaction.If you do not prefer a partnership I am willing to give you 10% of the money while the remaining 85% will be for my investment in your country. Contact me with the above telephone number and through my private E-mail address(mjohnson239@excite.com)or(mjohnson@hotvoice.com), while I implore you to maintain the absolute secrecy required in this transaction. Thanks, GOD BLESS YOU Yours Faithfully, Johnson From VRagozzino at nrtc.org Wed Sep 25 16:37:41 2002 From: VRagozzino at nrtc.org (Vincent Ragozzino) Date: Tue Jan 18 14:04:29 2005 Subject: [Ascend] TNT Modem Connection issues Message-ID: <9366A6ACB518D511B54B0008C78609E0022B8D48@exchange.nrtc.org> Hello All, I am currently working on a issue with 2 seperate TNT's in a dialup configuration. Both are experiencing call drops during negotiation and both are showing 45 - 50 modems in a suspect state. TNT1 running 9.0.6 with 5 Series 56 II Digital Modem Cards totalling 240 modems. I have 47 modems in a suspect state, multiple modems on multiple cards, all Inbound T1 lines look clean. TNT2 running 8.0.5 with 2 Series 56 II cards and 4 Series 56 Cards (Full Size) totalling 288 modems, again, all T1's look clean and the suspect modems are spanned across all the cards. Im looking for suggestions on possible causes and information on the firmware version for these code revisions, it seems that in 8.0.5, the firmware version for the Series II cards was upgraded to V5.8177, this level ran up until 9.0.6. I cannot locate any info on 9.0.7 - 9.0.8.....but in 9.0.9, the Firmware was downgraded to V5.817. Does anyone have any info on why it was downgraded? I am wondering if this might not be part of my problem? Thanks in advance for any replies, Vincent