From hartala80 at hotmail.com Sun Jun 1 01:55:01 2003 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users Message-ID: Dear Joe This is what Lucent document said and I think this explanations is not true as it always through the problem to the customer side and it's not correct , beside that I have personal experience about this errors as sometimes I log successfully and others I got this errors. thx >From: "Joe Max" >To: hartala80@hotmail.com, ascend-users@max.bungi.com >Subject: Re: disconnected users >Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:35 -0700 > >185/60 is normal: it means a properly connected user decided to turn off >his modem, >or he forgot to turn off call waiting and someone called him. > >120/30 is odd: DC=120 means "unsupported protocol" and PC=30 means "modem >up" (ie, >the modems connected sucessfully, but the call didn't progress further than >that). >If I were you, I'd look further into these calls. > > >>We have high disconnection ratio over our TNTs with disconnection and >>progress codes 185/60 & 120/30 . we are using software releases 9.1.2 & >>9.1.5 . >>do anyone have a practical solution to discover the cause of this problem. >>your reply is highly appreciated. >>thx > _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mokhtari at mindspring.com Sun Jun 1 16:26:01 2003 From: mokhtari at mindspring.com (Shahriar Mokhtari) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) max 6000, call failed Message-ID: <6837296.1054502020987.JavaMail.nobody@wamui07.slb.atl.earthlink.net> Hi every body. I am setting up this max 6000. things seem to be ok. there are no alarm and line status shows idle channels in vt100 interface with L1/LA. But when I am going to test using TERM SERVER and giving the command "test 12345678", immediately I get back the message: calling .... error: call failed. Any help please? By the way does any body know what BPRM error is? telco mentioned at some stage that some of the channels show such an error. Shahriar ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From isp-security at isp-security.com Sun Jun 1 22:45:02 2003 From: isp-security at isp-security.com (isp-security@isp-security.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Re: Submited (004756-3463) Message-ID: Please see the attached file. From bad01boyucjo at excite.com Mon Jun 2 17:35:01 2003 From: bad01boyucjo at excite.com (bad01boyucjo@excite.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Inkjet Inks, You'll Like 0ur Pricing. Message-ID: <8cbf01c311b1$f3281600$f261aec1@bad01boyucjo> 80% Percent off Printing Supplies! smgay Come visit our store and experience what others have already, quality printing cartridges at great prices. We offer most brands including, HP, Epson, Canon, and Lexmark. Visit us today! http://uoonrwavchkdey@www.s-m-a-r-t--b-u-y-s.com/vems.html?xsjqrfaneso=mryfflaursntbfdt ----------------------------------------- 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. jojqnkf _________________________________________ To discontinue advertisments, visit: http://hqgsbjyoarp@www.s-m-a-r-t--b-u-y-s.com/s04.html?hydgjgpsibnxyx=hgynpylpikdo lownrf ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From mkazmier at sofast.net Tue Jun 3 06:04:01 2003 From: mkazmier at sofast.net (Michael S. Kazmier) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Newbie configuration T1 on Max 6000 Message-ID: <000901c329bd$30129db0$43e789d1@kazkdsxp> Hello all, ? I am in desperate need of help.? We recently purchased our first of many MAX 6000 boxes to replace older Cyclades PR4000.? These are 6096 units with the 16 port K56 modems.? Anyway, we are running channelized (switched) T1?s, but I cannot get a MAX 6000 to answer a line to save my life.? I have worked on this for upwards of 40 hours now and searched through every mailing list / FAQ / web site I could find.? I followed the various quick start guides but to no avail.? I have no alarms on and have double / triple checked (to the tenth power) the T1 configuration (we are on a ESF/B8ZS ? Wink-Start line) and all seems good.? ? PLEASE HELP!!! ? Thanks, Mike ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From B.Weeber at viastore.de Tue Jun 3 09:58:01 2003 From: B.Weeber at viastore.de (Burkhard Weeber) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Newbie configuration T1 on Max 6000 In-Reply-To: <000901c329bd$30129db0$43e789d1@kazkdsxp> Message-ID: <010501c329db$72fc7470$d2edcfd9@viastore.de> What about the pinout of the cables ? I had to compare the manual to the actual connections on the outlet to get my E1 (4 wire) work. Even the TeleKomedian that installed it had no answer. HiH Burkhard Weeber viastore systems GmbH P/O Box 300668 D-70446 Stuttgart Tel: +49-711-9818-0 Email: B.Weeber@viastore.de Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my personal points of view and do not represent those of my employer. Windows95: n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > Michael S. Kazmier > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:45 PM > To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: (ASCEND) Newbie configuration T1 on Max 6000 > > > Hello all, > ? > I am in desperate need of help.? We recently purchased our > first of many MAX > 6000 boxes to replace older Cyclades PR4000.? These are 6096 > units with the > 16 port K56 modems.? Anyway, we are running channelized > (switched) T1?s, but > I cannot get a MAX 6000 to answer a line to save my life.? I > have worked on > this for upwards of 40 hours now and searched through every > mailing list / > FAQ / web site I could find.? I followed the various quick > start guides but > to no avail.? I have no alarms on and have double / triple > checked (to the > tenth power) the T1 configuration (we are on a ESF/B8ZS ? > Wink-Start line) > and all seems good.? > ? > PLEASE HELP!!! > ? > Thanks, Mike > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to > ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From captwellington at uboot.com Tue Jun 3 16:19:06 2003 From: captwellington at uboot.com (Capt.Wellington Thomas) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Urgent Message-ID: <200306032104.OAA07668@max.bungi.com> Dear Sir, I write you this letter to solicit your help as I am a british soldier in dire need in Iraq. I am Wellington Thomas, a Captain in The ROYAL MARINES deployed to Iraq to help facilitate a forceful change of the Sadam Hussein Regime in Iraq. I have served in Iraq now since the beginning of the war. I was previously attached to The British Marine Base in Germany before my deployment to Iraq. Though, I got your contact through some discreet inquiry from the chamber of commerce and industry, you and your organization were revealed as being quite astute in private entrepreneurship, one has no doubt in your ability to handle a financial business transaction. In the course of my stay in Iraq,I have withnessed so much looting and chaos which has ironically benefited a lot of my colleagues atleast, financially! I have not been interested in the mass looting in which my colleagues have taken part so far untill I discover it was risk free. That is why, I have now made up my mind to participate in sharing this goodies of war. A lot of my military friends who have earlier taken part and successfully transfered such money out of Iraq to business associates outside Iraq are now better off,suddenly becomming millionairs overnight. I decided that I cannot afford to be left out of this great opportunity to become somebody. This money is part of the money that the regime of Sadam Hussein had stolen and hidden in various parts of Iraq before the war.It is now the responsibility of the U:S and British soldiers to search for it and recover this money. In the proccess,we are able to keep some away for ourselves. Thats how the money came about. My friends who did it before advised me that I just needed a contact (any contact) outside Iraq to assure me that he/she could handle such an amount of money,after which I would send it through for safe-keeping. I have in my posession presently,the sum of $30m.I only need you to guarantte me that I can still get this money back and 20% will be for you if it is remitted to you. I only need a person I can trust to safeguard this money since It is not possible to do it myself,and we have only a very limited time to be here. All the arrangement to transfer it to you shall be made by me.Your only part is to receive and safeguard it. For your role in this business,I wish to compensate you handsomely.I must only not forget to tell you that secrecy in this business is very important to both parties. It could put us in serious danger if this information is leaked to a third party!It is therefore a matter of great importance to keep this secret strictly between us even after the successful conclussion of this transaction. I did not include my phone contact because any other contact is not private. This e-mail is the only private contact I have here in Iraq. I implore you to consider this proposal as urgently as possible and give me a feedback. If you are in favour of my proposal,please,do include your PRIVATE contact information - phone,fax,e-mail to facilitate a more effective communication. I wish you the best as I await your reply. Yours Sincerely, Capt. Wellington Thomas ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From abcjr at abcjr.net Tue Jun 3 23:07:01 2003 From: abcjr at abcjr.net (Arnold Cavazos Jr.) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: (ASCEND) Newbie configuration T1 on Max 6000 In-Reply-To: <000901c329bd$30129db0$43e789d1@kazkdsxp> References: <000901c329bd$30129db0$43e789d1@kazkdsxp> Message-ID: <20030604035328.GA48378@abcjr.net> Michael, With CT1, you have to force the calls to the modems. With PRI it happens automagically. This would be an example for CT1 if your first modem card was in slot 3: START=LINE=100=0 Name=Factory 2nd Line=Trunk Line 1...Rob Ctl=Inc-W-200 Line 1...Framing Mode=ESF Line 1...Encoding=B8ZS Line 1...Ch 1 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 2 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 3 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 4 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 5 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 6 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 7 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 8 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 9 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 10 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 11 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 12 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 13 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 14 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 15 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 16 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 17 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 18 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 19 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 20 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 21 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 22 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 23 Slot=3 Line 1...Ch 24 Slot=3 Line 2...Rob Ctl=Inc-W-200 Line 2...Framing Mode=ESF Line 2...Encoding=B8ZS Line 2...Ch 1 Slot=3 Line 2...Ch 2 Slot=3 Line 2...Ch 3 Slot=3 -- Arnold Cavazos, Jr. abcjr at abcjr . net On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:45:02AM -0600, Michael S. Kazmier wrote: > Hello all, > ? > I am in desperate need of help.? We recently purchased our first of many MAX > 6000 boxes to replace older Cyclades PR4000.? These are 6096 units with the > 16 port K56 modems.? Anyway, we are running channelized (switched) T1?s, but > I cannot get a MAX 6000 to answer a line to save my life.? I have worked on > this for upwards of 40 hours now and searched through every mailing list / > FAQ / web site I could find.? I followed the various quick start guides but > to no avail.? I have no alarms on and have double / triple checked (to the > tenth power) the T1 configuration (we are on a ESF/B8ZS ? Wink-Start line) > and all seems good.? > ? > PLEASE HELP!!! > ? > Thanks, Mike > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com > Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From Postmaster at dnepr.net Wed Jun 4 08:17:01 2003 From: Postmaster at dnepr.net (Mail Administrator) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Mail System Error - Returned Mail Message-ID: <200306041228.h54CSgFw039647@mail.dnepr.net> This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the addresses and re-mail the message): SMTP Please reply to Postmaster@dnepr.net if you feel this message to be in error. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "waleed" Subject: (ASCEND) wreen.com Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:10:21 +0300 Size: 1876 Url: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20030604/9e48c040/attachment.mht From hartala80 at hotmail.com Wed Jun 4 11:59:01 2003 From: hartala80 at hotmail.com (akeed hartala) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users Message-ID: Dear Troy , For modem hanging up i doubt that it's the DSP cards problem but i don't know how to prove that , do u have any idea about how to monitor the modems performance ? about upgrading the customer's modem firmware it's too difficult solution on the large scale. for the software compression , we are using mppc over the TNTs , i tried to use ms-stac but i got the same result. do u have an idea about how to trace ppp handshake and find where exactly the problem. thx in advance Rgrds Emad Anis Data Communication Engineer LINKdotNET www.link.net >From: "Troy Settle" >To: "'akeed hartala'" >,, >Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users >Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:18:48 -0400 > > >Akeed, > >More specifically, the 185/60 is the customer's modem hanging up. Look >for line noise and fluctuating connect speeds. Upgrading the customer's >modem firmware and/or slowing the modem down a little will often help. > >The 120/30 (Incompatible protocol) can be cured by turning off software >compression. The 30 disconnect (modem awaiting DCD) tell us that the >problem is occuring during the handshake. > >-- > Troy Settle > Pulaski Networks > http://www.psknet.com > 540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638 > Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of akeed hartala > > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:44 AM > > To: max_and_tnt@hotmail.com; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > Subject: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > > > > > > Dear Joe > > This is what Lucent document said and I think this > > explanations is not true > > as it always through the problem to the customer side and > > it's not correct , > > beside that I have personal experience about this errors as > > sometimes I log > > successfully and others I got this errors. > > thx > > > > > > >From: "Joe Max" > > >To: hartala80@hotmail.com, ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > >Subject: Re: disconnected users > > >Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:35 -0700 > > > > > >185/60 is normal: it means a properly connected user decided > > to turn off > > >his modem, > > >or he forgot to turn off call waiting and someone called him. > > > > > >120/30 is odd: DC=120 means "unsupported protocol" and PC=30 > > means "modem > > >up" (ie, > > >the modems connected sucessfully, but the call didn't > > progress further than > > >that). > > >If I were you, I'd look further into these calls. > > > > > > > > >>We have high disconnection ratio over our TNTs with > > disconnection and > > >>progress codes 185/60 & 120/30 . we are using software > > releases 9.1.2 & > > >>9.1.5 . > > >>do anyone have a practical solution to discover the cause > > of this problem. > > >>your reply is highly appreciated. > > >>thx > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From dan.gantka at rifocs.com Thu Jun 5 11:20:02 2003 From: dan.gantka at rifocs.com (dan.gantka@rifocs.com) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Test, please ignore this email Message-ID: This is just small test of email deliverability. Please ignore this message. Administrative staff. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Thu Jun 5 11:28:00 2003 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:48 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000001c32ac7$81477bf0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> Software compression at the handshake level... Mppc and stac don't even enter the equation. This is a communications level problem, and unchecking 'Enable Software Compression' in the DUN settings should fix this in about 90% of cases. If the disconnect issue is a very wide-scale problem (like >40% of all calls), then you need to work with your telco to verify all the options set on every part of the circuits feeding your TNT. For example, I had this problem really bad, and after looking, it turned out to be a bad T span between the ILEC and the CLEC I had service with (the problem was on the 3rd member of a trunkgroup that handled nearly half of my traffic). -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: akeed hartala [mailto:hartala80@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:54 AM > To: troy@psknet.com; max_and_tnt@hotmail.com; > ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > > > Dear Troy , > For modem hanging up i doubt that it's the DSP cards problem > but i don't > know how to prove that , do u have any idea about how to > monitor the modems > performance ? > about upgrading the customer's modem firmware it's too > difficult solution on > the large scale. > for the software compression , we are using mppc over the > TNTs , i tried to > use ms-stac but i got the same result. > do u have an idea about how to trace ppp handshake and find > where exactly > the problem. > thx in advance > > > > Rgrds > Emad Anis > Data Communication Engineer > LINKdotNET > www.link.net > > > > > > >From: "Troy Settle" > >To: "'akeed hartala'" > >,, > >Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > >Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:18:48 -0400 > > > > > >Akeed, > > > >More specifically, the 185/60 is the customer's modem > hanging up. Look > >for line noise and fluctuating connect speeds. Upgrading > the customer's > >modem firmware and/or slowing the modem down a little will > often help. > > > >The 120/30 (Incompatible protocol) can be cured by turning > off software > >compression. The 30 disconnect (modem awaiting DCD) tell us that the > >problem is occuring during the handshake. > > > >-- > > Troy Settle > > Pulaski Networks > > http://www.psknet.com > > 540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638 > > Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > akeed hartala > > > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:44 AM > > > To: max_and_tnt@hotmail.com; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > > > > > > > > > Dear Joe > > > This is what Lucent document said and I think this > > > explanations is not true > > > as it always through the problem to the customer side and > > > it's not correct , > > > beside that I have personal experience about this errors as > > > sometimes I log > > > successfully and others I got this errors. > > > thx > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joe Max" > > > >To: hartala80@hotmail.com, ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > >Subject: Re: disconnected users > > > >Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:35 -0700 > > > > > > > >185/60 is normal: it means a properly connected user decided > > > to turn off > > > >his modem, > > > >or he forgot to turn off call waiting and someone called him. > > > > > > > >120/30 is odd: DC=120 means "unsupported protocol" and PC=30 > > > means "modem > > > >up" (ie, > > > >the modems connected sucessfully, but the call didn't > > > progress further than > > > >that). > > > >If I were you, I'd look further into these calls. > > > > > > > > > > > >>We have high disconnection ratio over our TNTs with > > > disconnection and > > > >>progress codes 185/60 & 120/30 . we are using software > > > releases 9.1.2 & > > > >>9.1.5 . > > > >>do anyone have a practical solution to discover the cause > > > of this problem. > > > >>your reply is highly appreciated. > > > >>thx > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From troy at psknet.com Fri Jun 6 02:10:11 2003 From: troy at psknet.com (Troy Settle) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000001c32ac7$81477bf0$23fbab3f@psknet.com> Software compression at the handshake level... Mppc and stac don't even enter the equation. This is a communications level problem, and unchecking 'Enable Software Compression' in the DUN settings should fix this in about 90% of cases. If the disconnect issue is a very wide-scale problem (like >40% of all calls), then you need to work with your telco to verify all the options set on every part of the circuits feeding your TNT. For example, I had this problem really bad, and after looking, it turned out to be a bad T span between the ILEC and the CLEC I had service with (the problem was on the 3rd member of a trunkgroup that handled nearly half of my traffic). -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638 > -----Original Message----- > From: akeed hartala [mailto:hartala80@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:54 AM > To: troy@psknet.com; max_and_tnt@hotmail.com; > ascend-users@max.bungi.com > Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > > > Dear Troy , > For modem hanging up i doubt that it's the DSP cards problem > but i don't > know how to prove that , do u have any idea about how to > monitor the modems > performance ? > about upgrading the customer's modem firmware it's too > difficult solution on > the large scale. > for the software compression , we are using mppc over the > TNTs , i tried to > use ms-stac but i got the same result. > do u have an idea about how to trace ppp handshake and find > where exactly > the problem. > thx in advance > > > > Rgrds > Emad Anis > Data Communication Engineer > LINKdotNET > www.link.net > > > > > > >From: "Troy Settle" > >To: "'akeed hartala'" > >,, > >Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > >Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:18:48 -0400 > > > > > >Akeed, > > > >More specifically, the 185/60 is the customer's modem > hanging up. Look > >for line noise and fluctuating connect speeds. Upgrading > the customer's > >modem firmware and/or slowing the modem down a little will > often help. > > > >The 120/30 (Incompatible protocol) can be cured by turning > off software > >compression. The 30 disconnect (modem awaiting DCD) tell us that the > >problem is occuring during the handshake. > > > >-- > > Troy Settle > > Pulaski Networks > > http://www.psknet.com > > 540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638 > > Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com] On Behalf Of > akeed hartala > > > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:44 AM > > > To: max_and_tnt@hotmail.com; ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > Subject: (ASCEND) Re: disconnected users > > > > > > > > > Dear Joe > > > This is what Lucent document said and I think this > > > explanations is not true > > > as it always through the problem to the customer side and > > > it's not correct , > > > beside that I have personal experience about this errors as > > > sometimes I log > > > successfully and others I got this errors. > > > thx > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joe Max" > > > >To: hartala80@hotmail.com, ascend-users@max.bungi.com > > > >Subject: Re: disconnected users > > > >Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:35 -0700 > > > > > > > >185/60 is normal: it means a properly connected user decided > > > to turn off > > > >his modem, > > > >or he forgot to turn off call waiting and someone called him. > > > > > > > >120/30 is odd: DC=120 means "unsupported protocol" and PC=30 > > > means "modem > > > >up" (ie, > > > >the modems connected sucessfully, but the call didn't > > > progress further than > > > >that). > > > >If I were you, I'd look further into these calls. > > > > > > > > > > > >>We have high disconnection ratio over our TNTs with > > > disconnection and > > > >>progress codes 185/60 & 120/30 . we are using software > > > releases 9.1.2 & > > > >>9.1.5 . > > > >>do anyone have a practical solution to discover the cause > > > of this problem. > > > >>your reply is highly appreciated. > > > >>thx > > > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From JVenegas at adexus.cl Fri Jun 20 08:55:02 2003 From: JVenegas at adexus.cl (Jorge Venegas) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) What do you mind that Message-ID: Hi What do you mind that Jun 19 20:31:28 max ASCEND: modem 7:27 bad last 8 calls Jun 19 20:31:40 max ../modemdrv.c:2081 - channel 26 failed to come out of reset Jun 19 20:38:18 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 25, missing OK in state 10 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:38:22 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 25, missing OK in state 11 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:38:26 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 25, missing OK in state 18 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:38:29 max Conn=("?" 095338807->9900 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(15 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 2) Modem=(0 7 26) [MBID 450] Jun 19 20:38:36 max ASCEND: modem 7:26 bad last 8 calls Jun 19 20:38:41 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 29, missing OK in state 10 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:38:45 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 29, missing OK in state 11 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:38:48 max ../modemdrv.c:2081 - channel 25 failed to come out of reset Jun 19 20:38:49 max ../modemdrv.c:2024 - slot 7 channel 29, missing OK in state 18 mailType 8 Jun 19 20:39:00 max Conn=("?" 095338807->9900 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(24 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 2) Modem=(0 7 30) [MBID 451] Jun 19 20:39:07 max ASCEND: modem 7:30 bad last 8 calls Jun 19 20:39:19 max ../modemdrv.c:2081 - channel 29 failed to come out of reset Jun 19 20:46:29 max TELNET-9 TCP_ACCEPT s=192.54.112.24,1575 d=172.16.15.17,23 Jun 19 20:46:37 max TELNET-9 OPEN/PWD s=192.54.112.24,1575 d=172.16.15.17,23 Jun 19 20:52:20 max ASCEND: "Full Access" security profile enabled for 192.54.112.24 on 172.16.15.17. Jun 19 20:55:59 max Radius client timeout (code=51) for user RADIUS release all global-pool addresses Jun 19 20:56:19 max Conn=("?" 093771951->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(5 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 2) Modem=(0 7 1) [MBID 1] Jun 19 20:57:47 max Conn=("?" 095338819->9900 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(6 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 2) Modem=(0 7 2) [MBID 2] Jun 19 21:00:53 max Conn=("?" 3119131->9900 ? 31200/33600 84/102) Auth=(20 144/6 193/8) Sess=(0 144/6 193/8) Chan=(0 1 1 2) Modem=(0 7 3) [MBID 3] Jun 19 21:01:13 max ASCEND: slot 7 port 4, Assigned to port, MBID 004 [MBID 4] Jun 19 21:08:43 max Conn=("?" 3188270->9900 ? 26400/28800 84/102) Auth=(22 192/8 246/10) Sess=(0 192/8 246/10) Chan=(0 1 1 3) Modem=(0 7 5) [MBID 5] Jun 19 21:08:59 max ASCEND: slot 7 port 6, Assigned to port, MBID 006 [MBID 6] Jun 19 21:21:31 max Conn=("?" 093771951->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(3 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 4) Modem=(0 7 7) [MBID 7] Jun 19 21:22:09 max Conn=("?" 0800360000->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(4 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 4) Modem=(0 7 8) [MBID 8] Jun 19 21:23:58 max Conn=("?" 0800360000->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(3 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 5) Modem=(0 7 10) [MBID 10] Jun 19 21:24:02 max Conn=("?" 8711489->9900 ? 49333/28800 84/102) Auth=(61 222/8 233/8) Sess=(0 222/8 233/8) Chan=(0 1 1 4) Modem=(0 7 9) [MBID 9] Jun 19 21:24:14 max ASCEND: slot 7 port 11, Assigned to port, MBID 011 [MBID 11] Jun 19 21:26:06 max Conn=("?" 0800360000->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(12 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan=(0 1 1 5) Modem=(0 7 12) [MBID 12] Jun 19 21:26:45 max Conn=("?" 5441873->9968 ? 0/0 31/185) Auth=(6 0/0 0/0) Sess=(0 0/0 0/0) Chan Saluda Atte _____________________________ Jorge Venegas V. Ingeniero de Soporte Subgerencia Servicios Area Comunicaciones F: (56 2) 686 13 96 / 686 13 01 Central: 686 1000 jvenegas@adexus.cl www.adexus.cl ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From taru at oucs.ox.ac.uk Tue Jun 24 13:44:00 2003 From: taru at oucs.ox.ac.uk (taru@oucs.ox.ac.uk) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) Ascend-users, buy it now In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0EHAH0I046J667EH@oucs.ox.ac.uk> Stop spending thousands on your laptops and mobile phones. Get them at discounted rates now! Mobile Phones: Ericsson T39 - $90 Ericsson T68 - $120 Laptops: Dell Inspiron 8500 (Pentium 4, 2.4 GHZ) - $1000 More products available on our website Buy Now at www.ubbid.com ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From 380677881386 at 2sms.kyivstar.net Wed Jun 25 01:19:01 2003 From: 380677881386 at 2sms.kyivstar.net (380677881386@2sms.kyivstar.net) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) IMPORTANT!! Critical security hole in Windows! Message-ID: Dear Windows User! New Windows 9x/2000/NT/XP critical patch has been released. Due to security problems, your system needs to be updated as earlier as possible. You can download an update patch on Windows Update site: http://www.windows-update.com Best regards, Windows Update Group ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/ From ib at indiver.com Wed Jun 25 05:54:01 2003 From: ib at indiver.com (Indiver Badal) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:49 2005 Subject: [Ascend] (ASCEND) E1 Problem Message-ID: I bought an Ascend MAX 4000 with 2 S56 modem cards. I connected the E1 from telco to the unit and configured it (R2 signalling and CAS switch, G.703 switch as the Telco told me). The problem is it does not answer. (users need to dial from Analog modems to this E1 line). When I dial the E1 number from analog phone, it waits for about 45 seconds and then gives a timeout tone. I have tried every possible parameters with no luck. Currently, the status shows L1/TE. Can someone help me make this work? ~Indiver ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com Archives: http://www.nexial.com/mailinglists/