From vashdevt at yahoo.com Fri Nov 7 01:11:53 2003 From: vashdevt at yahoo.com (vashdev talk) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] help required Message-ID: <20031107071153.66083.qmail@web10702.mail.yahoo.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From lo.ad at codetel.net.do Fri Nov 7 07:32:42 2003 From: lo.ad at codetel.net.do (J Anderson) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Error on Max 6000 Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From jeff at team1internet.com Mon Nov 17 16:14:34 2003 From: jeff at team1internet.com (Jeff Meek) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] How to make a MAX 6000 *ignore* incoming calls Message-ID: <01fc01c3ad58$2ece1190$260f6ed8@jefft1> Hi, I have a project where I am using MAX 6000s to terminate PRIs for testing. As part of this project, I am presenting calls to the MAX on the PRI, but I don't want the MAX to answer the call. The complication is that I also don't want the MAX to outright *reject* the call either. I need the call to sit and ring on the MAX while I collect data about the call from the PRIdisplay command. I have tried using an AT string of s0=9, to tell the modems to answer after 9 rings. That didn't seem to work. What would 9 "rings" mean on a PRI anyway? Does anyone have any suggestions on how I could get the MAX to ignore but not reject incoming calls? Thanks, Jeff _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From bgd at icomag.de Thu Nov 20 11:46:17 2003 From: bgd at icomag.de (Bogdan TARU) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend internal IP routing Message-ID: <20031120174617.GC51501@icomag.de> Hi everyone, First of all, please include my email address when replying, I am not subscribed to the list. Secondly, I've failed to configure an Ascend Max 6000 as a dialin router. The setup is the following: Client PC -> MAX router -> network The IPs for the dialin clients are assigned automatically by a Radiator server from the net 10.0.0.0/24. The radius server has the IP 192.168.0.2, and Max has the IP 192.168.0.3 and the gateway for both is 192.168.0.1. I have configured the Max to be able to 'see' the 192.168.0.0/24 lan, and to be able to ping any host from internet. So the Lan part is set up correctly. As well, the client PCs get the IPs right from the radiator server, through the Ascend box. Both Auth and Acct work great. The problem is that even though there is a client with the ip 10.0.0.50 (ip assigned by radius, of course) connected to the max, from that client no ping works to the max, and the max can't ping that IP either. So I suspected something was wrong with the internal routing inside the max. So I've checked it out, and I get the following: ascend% sh ip route Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.1 ie0 SGP 60 1 178 1547 10.0.0.0/25 - rj0 C 0 0 129 1352 127.0.0.0/8 - bh0 CP 0 0 0 3352 127.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 20 3352 127.0.0.2/32 - rj0 CP 0 0 15433 3352 192.168.0.0/24 - ie0 C 0 0 7865 3352 192.168.0.3/32 - local CP 0 0 3368 3352 224.0.0.0/4 - mcast CP 0 0 54 3352 224.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3352 224.0.0.2/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3352 224.0.0.9/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3352 255.255.255.255/32 - ie0 CP 0 0 0 3352 ascend% sh ip address VRouter: Interface IP Address Dest IP Address Netmask MTU Status ie0 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.0 1500 Up wanidle0 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.0 1500 Up vr0_main 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up mcast 224.0.0.0 N/A 240.0.0.0 65535 Up rj0 127.0.0.2 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up bh0 127.0.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up local 127.0.0.1 N/A 255.255.255.255 65535 Up lo0 127.0.0.1 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up When somebody logs in, the command outputs are: ascend% sh ip route Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.0.1 ie0 SGP 60 1 178 1710 10.0.0.0/25 - rj0 C 0 0 144 1515 127.0.0.0/8 - bh0 CP 0 0 0 3515 127.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 20 3515 127.0.0.2/32 - rj0 CP 0 0 60101 3515 192.168.0.0/24 - ie0 C 0 0 7949 3515 192.168.0.3/32 - local CP 0 0 3401 3515 224.0.0.0/4 - mcast CP 0 0 54 3515 224.0.0.1/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3515 224.0.0.2/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3515 224.0.0.9/32 - local CP 0 0 0 3515 255.255.255.255/32 - ie0 CP 0 0 15 3515 ascend% sh ip address VRouter: Interface IP Address Dest IP Address Netmask MTU Status ie0 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.0 1500 Up wan25 192.168.0.3 -> 10.0.0.42 255.255.255.255 1500 Up wanidle0 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.0 1500 Up vr0_main 192.168.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up mcast 224.0.0.0 N/A 240.0.0.0 65535 Up rj0 127.0.0.2 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up bh0 127.0.0.3 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up local 127.0.0.1 N/A 255.255.255.255 65535 Up lo0 127.0.0.1 N/A 255.255.255.255 1500 Up I have also tried to make a pool with the ips in the class 10.0.0.0/24, but that didn't solve anything either. And I've tried a lot of other things, like proxy = yes, changing the wan ip, the if addr ips, and so on. No result... Is there something that I need to add to the radius reply to the ascend box? Right now the reply looks like: Code: Access-Accept Identifier: 9 Authentic: <16>"<154><214><156><15>b<241>{<224><134><142><154><132><154>2 Attributes: Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP Session-Timeout = 3600 Framed-IP-Address = 10.0.0.42 Or what settings do I need to enable/disable on the Ascend? I would need more-or-less a complete guide, because I'm: 1. new to ascend ; 2. I don't know which switches which I've already set will affect the new settings that (hopefully) you're gonna guide me to. Anyways, thanks in advance, bogdan _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From pschobel at porchlight.ca Thu Nov 20 17:06:47 2003 From: pschobel at porchlight.ca (Peter Schobel) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Port Redirection Message-ID: <3795A73C-1BAE-11D8-B0E4-000393677A36@porchlight.ca> I'm trying to write a radius profile that will redirect users to a web proxy server but for some reason it doesn't seen to work for me I'm using Ascend Max TNT RAS my user file entry looks like this testing123 Crypt-Password = "$1$6...Y1", Simultaneous-Use = 1 Service-Type = Framed, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254, Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255, Ascend-Port-Redir-Protocol = Ascend-Proto-TCP, Ascend-Port-Redir-Portnum = 80, Ascend-Port-Redir-Server = 10.0.0.2, Framed-Routing = None, Framed-MTU = 1500 # when i log in as this proxy user, i can still surf the net as usual without being directed to the proxy web server my web server is on the same subnet as my max - does anyone know why this would not work? thanks in advance, ***************************** Peter Schobel ***************************** ***************************** Peter Schobel Network Administrator Porchlight.ca Unlimited Internet ***************************** In a world without walls or fences We will have no need for gates or windows ***************************** _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From braveheart at buraak.net.pk Tue Nov 25 17:56:33 2003 From: braveheart at buraak.net.pk (Mahmood Ahmed) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] better understanding & solution of Ascend-Disconnect-Causes Message-ID: <20031125234814.M19684@buraak.net.pk> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From bryan at eburg.com Mon Nov 24 10:45:15 2003 From: bryan at eburg.com (Bryan Clark) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:57:57 2005 Subject: [Ascend] better understanding & solution of Ascend-Disconnect-Causes In-Reply-To: <20031125234814.M19684@buraak.net.pk> References: <20031125234814.M19684@buraak.net.pk> Message-ID: <3FC2359B.30203@eburg.com> In my experience, cause 185 is usually associated with 2 things: 1) Poor connection or noise in the telephone line, which you will notice comes with extreme variations in the customers connection speeds 2) software modems - winmodems are horrible, and I have seen customers cause 185 or cause 11 problems go away when they stop using software(pci) modems. Mahmood Ahmed wrote: > Hello! > > (A) Is there any documentation available to describe > Ascend-Disconnect-Causes in detail and thier solutin. like if MAX > reports "remoteEndHungup" as a disconnection cause what should i ask > my client to look for on his end ? . > > (B) Does any one has a uptodated version of Ascend-Disconnect-Cause, > if yes please mail the document to list. > > (C) Can one tell me what does the disconnect cause "39" means. > > Regards > > Mahmood Ahmed > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This mail has been sent using Buraak Net's Mailing System > (http://www.buraak.net.pk ) > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >rte-ascend mailing list >rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com >https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > > _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend