From mike at sentex.net Sun Oct 3 08:47:37 2004 From: mike at sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:09 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Getting updated software for 6096s Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.1.20041003094533.01d1b380@64.7.134.1> I have a few Ascend 6096s that are running 9.0.9. Is there a better version to be running ? A few years ago I asked Lucent what would be the cost just to get software upgrades and they told me that could only do a full service package for $10K which was kind of nuts considering at that time I could buy replacement units for $1,000. (now much less). Anyone running anything newer ? Or is older better ? I am after optimal modem performance and basic functioning OSPF. _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From david.pascarella at solunet.com Mon Oct 4 14:07:37 2004 From: david.pascarella at solunet.com (David Pascarella) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:09 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Getting updated software for 6096s Message-ID: <6EAEA2BCE0CA0D4A983470A0EDED82366D0233@hqmail.solunet.com> Hi Mike, I'd say that 'newer is not necessarily better' in this case. The next rev of code for you is 9.1.x but is licensed. What is the filename your 6096's are currently running? (e.g. tbixk.m60, tik.m60, etc.) The upper revs of 9.1.x and higher require increase flash capacity but there is a 'thin load' of 9.1.x that you can run without the flash upgrade. In any case, no one can guarantee that this upgrade will give you significant 'modem performance' improvements. What type of modem modules do you have installed? Have you tried running OSPF already? Is there an issue with running it on your current rev? - Dave -----Original Message----- From: rte-ascend-bounces@lists.real-time.com [mailto:rte-ascend-bounces@lists.real-time.com] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 9:48 AM To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com Subject: [Ascend] Getting updated software for 6096s I have a few Ascend 6096s that are running 9.0.9. Is there a better version to be running ? A few years ago I asked Lucent what would be the cost just to get software upgrades and they told me that could only do a full service package for $10K which was kind of nuts considering at that time I could buy replacement units for $1,000. (now much less). Anyone running anything newer ? Or is older better ? I am after optimal modem performance and basic functioning OSPF. _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From mike at sentex.net Mon Oct 4 15:13:25 2004 From: mike at sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Getting updated software for 6096s In-Reply-To: <6EAEA2BCE0CA0D4A983470A0EDED82366D0233@hqmail.solunet.com> References: <6EAEA2BCE0CA0D4A983470A0EDED82366D0233@hqmail.solunet.com> Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20041004151652.111a4170@64.7.153.2> At 03:07 PM 04/10/2004, David Pascarella wrote: >Hi Mike, > >I'd say that 'newer is not necessarily better' in this case. The next >rev of code for you is 9.1.x but is licensed. What is the filename your >6096's are currently running? (e.g. tbixk.m60, tik.m60, etc.) Hi, Currently its the last public rev off the Ascend website. (9.0.9) and the load says tbixkh.m60. Dont need any features much beyond IP, L2TP and OSPF. > The >upper revs of 9.1.x and higher require increase flash capacity but there >is a 'thin load' of 9.1.x that you can run without the flash upgrade. >In any case, no one can guarantee that this upgrade will give you >significant 'modem performance' improvements. What type of modem modules >do you have installed? K56-Modem 16s and one machine with the 30s. >Have you tried running OSPF already? Is there an issue with running it >on your current rev? It works a little wonky (from what I am used to on PM3s and Ciscos), but I get it to work as well as I need it to. I am not running a very complicated topology where my terminal servers are, so its just the one area 0 backbone. The main thing I was hoping to get is improved modem performance if possible. ---Mike _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From steverivera at wrca.net Tue Oct 12 09:51:33 2004 From: steverivera at wrca.net (Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] WTS: Ascend APX8-SL-96DSP Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20041012105109.031f35d0@mail.webnj.net> WTS: Ascend APX8-SL-96DSP Available now. Ascend APX8-SL-96DSP Open to offers. Discounts available on Qty purchases. Steve Rivera WR Consultant Associates, Inc. Dir: 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 www.wrca.net Providing Network Hardware Since 1981. _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From jake at portmasters.com Wed Oct 13 16:43:30 2004 From: jake at portmasters.com (Jake Messinger) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max Images Message-ID: <059901c4b16d$ae2db840$9600000a@jake> Im working on trying to obtain images for the MAX 1800, 2000 and 6000 series routers. I dont know where they currently stand other than they are EOL'd. That should mean that the images are freely downloadable in my opinion... like they Portmaster images are. We took over all the Portmaster support when Lucent decided to EOL those.. So... I need catching up... do a lot of people still use maxes? Are the images hard to find? What about user based support? ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com 8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org profjake.com Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org homestarrunner.com ICQ# 4403734 YAHOO: prof_jake AIM: profjake MSN: jake@jakes.org Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From rbadilla at cesa.co.cr Thu Oct 14 14:53:43 2004 From: rbadilla at cesa.co.cr (Randall Badilla Castro) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Password Recovery for ClearTrac D300 Message-ID: <416ED947.3030305@cesa.co.cr> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi: First my apologizes to all if this is off-topic... But Lucent's docs are "lost" in the ether... I have a ClearTrac D300 who nobody seem to remember the password ... Somebody know where is the documentation or how to make a password recovery of this equipment!? TIA - -- Saludos, atte. Regards, sincerely yours. Randall Badilla Castro ********************************************************* *"El peor intento, es el que no se hace" * *"El peor error, no reconocer que podemos equivocarnos" * ********************************************************* Tel/Phone Ofic: (+506) 224-4444 ext 246 Fax Ofic: (+506) 253-5450 Agenda/Calendar: http://www.cesa.co.cr:80/uwc/?calid=rbadilla@cesa.co.cr IM@MSN: rbadillarx Keyserver: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net KeyID: pub 1792R/105E103E 2004-02-26 rbadilla (pgp) Primary key fingerprint: 4C23 F19A 45B5 0A28 0CA4 D20E 227D 31D4 105E 103E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: pgp iQD1AwUBQW7ZRkLyKFRWGHddAQLWWAb+KyAy1O3GK/tKfSrpWkvNaBGVnOJkp7pn EZleM0ZRQaFgR7H5/+qfxmH9UJw+YUZTT5v9gE6qLx6w/cxZJZcVlgvbJfCXy+L0 5fLUdFsgoP2IsCkH/r61hMPChwZ9OinM8XK+dKPAMGNKOOXQrSaWgw/H1NddlqEM KG++NbFXn0yB7QZwygffUO+2W7sPx+1D07ruS/yC7rb9S5I47M05NvmRCi8fov/+ 1/a4FkS6RaeLBb0WOjMrW8csqqdJtrPOaUT8dd9T5ALKF2v2TTz2kvZJTP6x4aRf NSxYK+ZssfE= =MkE7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From brandons at contactcom.net Tue Oct 19 16:04:43 2004 From: brandons at contactcom.net (Brandon Shiers) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Anybody using Qwest SS7 Message-ID: <1098219883.30166.28.camel@xanadu.ops.wyoming.com> Hello, Is anybody out there using Qwest as their SS7 providers and tying the circuits into their ASG's? If so, what kind of equipment did you use/recommend to get from Point A to Point B? Where I'm at (don't know if this is universal, but would assume so) Qwest's STP only terminates DS1 ports, and the ASG's Arctic cards can only terminate a DS0 port. I have to get the circuits from 2 cities back to the city that my ASG resides in and it's a 200 + mile hike from both of them for a DS0. If anybody is using Qwest for SS7, how has it been compared to other providers such as Illuminet? Are they as responsive, less, etc? TYIA, Brandon Shiers _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From adnann5 at yahoo.co.uk Thu Oct 21 12:17:28 2004 From: adnann5 at yahoo.co.uk (Muhammad Adnan Butt) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Ascend Max TNT Disconnection @ User End Message-ID: <20041021171728.86587.qmail@web25406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From info at qualitek.net Thu Oct 21 17:52:36 2004 From: info at qualitek.net (Qualitek) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT All Options In-Reply-To: <20041021171728.86587.qmail@web25406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend From larryk at cinergycom.com Fri Oct 22 11:42:35 2004 From: larryk at cinergycom.com (Larry Kellems) Date: Tue Jan 18 13:58:10 2005 Subject: [Ascend] Re: rte-ascend Digest, Vol 13, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1098463355.13620.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> I have the same problem, if I upgrade to anything other than 8.0.3 my disconnect rates go up. 8.0.3 is real stable for me and my users. I am running 12 Max TNTs. -- ======================================================================== , . .--. _|__ |____| Larry Kellems / \ |____| / [] |____| Network Engineer |__________| | Cinergy Communications | ____ | | _ 1419 W. Lloyd Expressway, Suite 101 | |\ /| | | _[_]_ Evansville, IN 47710 | | \/ | | | c") | | /\ | | | ,(_)' larryk@cinergycom.com |__|/__\|__|__| -"- 812.456.1274 ======================================================================== On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 12:00, rte-ascend-request@lists.real-time.com wrote: > Send rte-ascend mailing list submissions to > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > rte-ascend-request@lists.real-time.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > rte-ascend-owner@lists.real-time.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rte-ascend digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Ascend Max TNT Disconnection @ User End (Muhammad Adnan Butt) > 2. Max TNT All Options (Qualitek) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:17:28 +0100 (BST) > From: Muhammad Adnan Butt > Subject: [Ascend] Ascend Max TNT Disconnection @ User End > To: rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > Message-ID: <20041021171728.86587.qmail@web25406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi All! > i was using max 6000 previously from 3 years , now we switched to tnt ....but having some problems with it, end user disconnection ratiue is increased, while it was fine on max6000....we are running TAOS 9.0.9 on tnt... > dows anybody have any idea? > ( reply directly ) > thnx in advance:) > > > --------------------------------- > ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20041021/cdccb5db/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:52:36 -0700 > From: "Qualitek" > Subject: [Ascend] Max TNT All Options > To: > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > We have available the following if anyone is interested: > > > > 1- TNT-2AC-H or TNT-2DC-H or DSLTNT-2AC-H Chassis > 1- TNT-SP-SC Shelf Controller (All Options) > 2- TNT-SP-AC-H or DC-H Power Supplies > 1- Rackmount kit > > > > Quantity available for only $675each > > > > Regards, > Sean Bennett > > www.Qualitek.net > > Qualitek Services, Inc. > > 2215 Ringwood Ave > > San Jose, CA 95131 > > PH: 408.690.7351 > > FX: 408.597.0131 > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/rte-ascend/attachments/20041021/827312eb/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rte-ascend mailing list > rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend > > > End of rte-ascend Digest, Vol 13, Issue 8 > ***************************************** _______________________________________________ rte-ascend mailing list rte-ascend@lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend