> I believe that Starcraft works under Wine, runs quite happily on my 1.1GHz; tho it *is* a resource hog. turns out to be idiotically simple to get working under the latest versions of WINE. 1. install wine (apt-get install wine, in my case) 2. install winesetuptk (apt-get install winesetuptk) 3. configure your own fake win95 installation with winesetup (it's a GUI click-by-numbers thing). 4. mount the Starcraft CD. 5. wine --winver win95 /mnt/cdrom/setup.exe 6. wine -winver win95 ~/.wine/fake_windows/starcraft/StarCraft.exe ... and you're playing. :) it'll even play in a 640x480 window on your desktop. only problem with that, is that it's an unmanaged window; and on my triple-monitor setup, ends up in the upper left corner of the screen, over an arm's-length away and way off to one side. ;> I just set up another user (named 'starcraft') and created a custom XF86Config-4 file for them, set up for 640x480, using only one screen. :) Nate suggested setting that X session up on another virtual console; but I found that: a. the video driver didn't like rendering text in multiple X sessions, and smeared text in my terminal window into lines across the screen b. performance sucked >Warcraft is almost the same game > and would imagine the same thing. try Freecraft. www.freecraft.org. plays like Warcraft, but is native to *nix. can use the Warcraft artwork; so it looks just the same. it's also easy to make your own artwork for the units; and there's a project going, to create a full set of replacement art for it, so they don't have to use the (copyrighted) Warcraft images. Carl Soderstrom -- Network Engineer Real-Time Enterprises (952) 943-8700