On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:01:35PM -0500, Ben Lutgens wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:21:02PM -0600, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: > >not. Would it be possible to pick places a little less.. anal, in the > >future? Or has this been brought up before? Are people <21 not welcome > >at the beer meetings? > > a: it's a Beer Meeting NOT a LUG meeting > 2: Noone expressly picked McGoverns because of the age limit. It wasn't > an issue last time. The never checked. There were people unable to > imbibe and noone gave two shits. I didn't suspect that they had. > d: Of course they're gonna say that. You could be the police. In Texas... I wasn't aware that MN was this anal about alcohol. > > > > >(McGoverns told me on the phone that nobody <21 is allowed 'upstairs', > >and nobody <21 is allowed to sit at a table where people are drinking) > > So they sit at the very next table. What's the big hang up. we'll > probably occupy a couple of tables. Apparently 'upstairs' is off limits, downstairs tables is off limits if someone is drinking.. Maybe the person I spoke to on the phone was incorrect, in self defense here, I did ask on the channel, it was suggested that I call and ask =P > Ben Lutgens | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ -- Matthew S. Hallacy FUBAR, LART, BOFH Certified http://techmonkeys.org/~poptix GPG public key 0x01938203