On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 16:13, Ryan Ware wrote: > Does show Linux's lack of desktop installations I would say, if even > TCLugger's use windows on their machines. I have tried several versions > of Linux for the desktop and don't like it. I like it on the server > though. save your windows evangelism for someone else. Noone here cares. > > > So, shut off the hack? If so why? If not, why? > > Leave it on. I rather enjoy it. You could change it from time to time. > How about this "something is wrong with your Outlook!, please contact > your administrator", or "Outlook encountered an error, please reboot > now.", if you really wanted to be mean. I use outlook because that is > what we use here at my job. I sometimes use pine here with the imap > features of our exchange server too. I use Eudora at home on my win2k > box. We have taken measures here at my work, we strip all attachment > types know to contain viruses before the mail ever gets handed off to > exchange. oh my god an exchange server that strips attachments. What will those wily coyotes at micros~1 think of next.... symlinks maybe? So does that mean your totally excellent mail client can't comprehend (or even receive) this gpg signature i've used to verify this mail came from me? That's just great! Now I can deny that I sent it! -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. pub 1024D/9A0DDC59 2001-12-12 Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> Key fingerprint = 8FCD A1EE CEA7 DEE1 9361 F32C 0A90 30D1 9A0D DC59 sub 1024g/1FC75C99 2001-12-12 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020204/ecb08124/attachment.pgp