-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 30 October 2001 22:21, Bob Tanner shouted from the rooftops, 
saying:
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011030/tc/tech_intel_napster_dc_2.html
>
> "In any case, using Linux is not much cheaper than Windows 2000.
> Although Linux as an operating system is free, the real costs are
> related to the computers, and support and maintenance, he said."
>
> I might be blinded by by religion and this group my not have the ability
> to let the religion go, but can anyone look outside the box on this and
> comment?
>
> My perspective is Linux is much cheaper then Windows. Even if you pay
> for a distro you are starting out ahead. Add the virus resistence,
> stability, reliability, and security out of the box. Linux should be
> have a better TOC then Win2k.

Check these out:
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7720536.html?tag=owv
http://www.robval.com/linux/desktop/index.asp

Dave
- -- 
Diplomacy is to do and say, the nastiest thing in the nicest way.
		-- Balfour
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE74AIkA68l26XsZUYRAuCuAKCHgSurmyJH+/4Nl3MX71+qcF++ygCgvm0s
SPwrVpPACjHaQfadtjkXp4Y=
=YkZz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----