On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 08:58, Scott Dier wrote: > * Dave Sherman <dsherman at real-time.com> [020104 06:10]: > > > "In any case, using Linux is not much cheaper than Windows 2000. > > Except that the fact that w2k server is the only real way to compare to > linux, since it actually has true remote administration capibilities. > > -- > Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> http://www.ringworld.org/ I just want to say for the record, I did NOT write the above quote! That line was quoted by Bob Tanner from an article he linked in his original post. I replied to his post, and somehow my name got "credited" in Scott's post above. My post supplied two URLs with interesting articles comparing the TCO of Windows vs. Linux. Anyway, I don't know how or why my post should show up so late, since the date was Oct 31... Dave Sherman -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and good with ketchup.