On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 15:12, Bob Tanner wrote: > Quoting Joel Rosenberg (joelr at ellegon.com): > > Except, of course, people speeding causes other folks problems and > > danger; given the actual bandwidth, a *lot* of folks would have to run a > > *lot* of servers in order to inconvenience anybody else even a little, > > and that's apparently not happening. > > AS and ISP I disagree. > > 2 words for you. > > CodRed > Nimda > > These things cause all sorts of "traffic accidents" on networks. > > A fair enough cop, perhaps, but I think I was talking about servers being run as, well, servers, rather than as part of a network attack. By that standard, pretty much any station that can generate packets is a potential danger. Quick question: I'm using postfix for local mail delivery -- running fetchmail to pick up popmail from various servers. Is there any quick and easy way I can restrict postfix access to IP addresses of 192.168.0.n? ------------------------------------- There's a widow in sleepy Chester Who weeps for her only son; There's a grave on the Pabeng River, A grave that the Burmans shun, And there's Subadar Prag Tewarri Who tells how the work was done. -------------------------------------