On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 20:18, duncan <duncan at sodatrain.com> wrote: > Can anyone comment on using Bind 9 in a production environment? I've > used bind 8 and djbdns most recently, but im again interested in bind > due to the apparent improvements in an entire (?) re-write of the code. > > Has it matured enough to be stable for production use? One word: DNAME Having had to maintain a DNS for fifteen "synonym" domains on seven nameservers in five timezones ... DNAME. Bind 9 rules hard. -- $ fortune -m Kellen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020604/7bf4ee12/attachment.pgp