On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:04:19AM -0500, Johnny Fulcrum wrote:
> to dig a bit to find my doc - if you'd like...  (I think I was using
> wuftp....)

Slightly off-topic, but I would recommend not using WuFTPd for new
installations.  I would also recommend migrating away from it for
existing ones.  The software has been a veritable nightmare of bugs and
exploits.  ProFTPd has had it's own shakey history.

Here's my recommendation, but I'm not the only one who thinks so.  Red
Hat uses this software for their FTP mirrors:

Package: vsftpd
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-Size: 180
Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.0.0-2
Provides: ftp-server
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libcap1, libpam0g (>= 0.72-1)
Recommends: logrotate
Filename: pool/main/v/vsftpd/vsftpd_1.0.0-2_i386.deb
Size: 60082
MD5sum: 6b1faf046ee1203833f6ad7b2a542e71
Description: The Very Secure FTP Daemon
 A lightweight, efficient FTP server written from the ground up with
 security in mind.
 .
 vsftpd supports both anonymous and non-anonymous FTP, PAM authentication,
 bandwidth limiting, and the Linux sendfile() facility.

-- 
Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030814/53f27b67/attachment.pgp