On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:28:57AM -0500, Clay Fandre wrote: > >On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Scot Jenkins wrote: > >> how about this as the topic for the next tclug poll? >> >> Clay Fandre wrote: >> > Just because we decided against becoming a NPO in the past doesn't >> > mean we can't investigate it again. If someone is willing to put the >> > time and effort in, and you get the buy-in of the group, I'm all for >> > it. But the LUG as a whole needs to decide, not just one person. >> > >Before we can decide if we want to become a NPO or not I think we need >to find someone willing to lead the effort. Even if it's decided that >we should be a NPO, if no one has the time to do it then it doesn't >really matter. > >And from what I've been hearing (yet again), it's not worth it. IIRC Bob has alot of the pertinent info archived someplace. I'm sure he'd be willing to make it available if someone wanted to lead the march. Bob? -- Linux Administrator || Technology Specialist || Wifi Engineer http://autonomous.tv/~spencer/resume/ || spencer at autonomous.tv Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030815/2284cd19/attachment.pgp