Corrupt registry?
backup, backup, backup, and restore.

Sam.


Christopher Smith wrote:

>Amen to ini files. 
>I really hate when you need to spend hours looking for some binary setting
>in the registry to fix some program behaivor.  Don't get me started on a
>corrupted registry.  
>
>Chris Smith
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org
>[mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org] On Behalf Of Karl Bongers
>Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:58 AM
>To: TCLUG Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [TCLUG] Order of Execution
>
>On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:23:27AM -0600, Sam MacDonald wrote:
>  
>
>>I have a related question about symlinks or "symbolic links" for the
>>    
>>
>group.
>  
>
>>One of the things about NT that makes it easy to understand is the use 
>>of the registry. The registry links objects to what the object is used 
>>for or to objects it uses.  It organizes everything in a central
>>    
>>
>Hierarchy.
>  
>
>>No central registry exists in Linux that I have found, it feels
>>    
>>
>
>You make the registry sound so clean and neat, I've always considered it a
>vast dumping ground for unrelated, unused configuration settings.
>I kinda preferred INI files, I'm a simple person.
>Maintaining the register is like dumpster diving.
>
>  
>
>>scattered to me at this point.  I can't go to one place and find the 
>>guts of everything.
>>    
>>
>
>Yes you can, its called "/etc" and it's easy enough to use.  All the system
>configuration settings are in etc.  Personal configurations are in home
>directories in a somewhat less organized way.
>(A home/person/etc might have been nice)
> 
>  
>
>>The essence of Linux is the File System and Symlinks if I'm not 
>>mistaken, "Yes"?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, I think you are right.
>But not symlinks, symlinks is just a semi-useful trick that some file
>systems support.  I doubt that a basic unix system requires them.
> 
>  
>
>>I need to be sure I'm understanding "in the Linux world" what I 
>>understand in the NT world.
>>
>>Could it be said (without opening a can of flames) that,
>>   symlinks do something similar to registry entries by pointing to 
>>other objects.
>>    
>>
>
>They are a secondary reference(or link) to files or folders, they can be
>used to organize(or disorganize) a file system.
>
>  
>
>>I'm trying to take my NT registry knowledge that is the guts of the OS 
>>and translate Linux in to that understanding.  Remember NT was 
>>designed by VAX guys, they took the guts of VAX and translated it in 
>>to the NT registry.  Kinda like what Compaq did with the PC BIOS ;-)
>>    
>>
>
>I would not consider NT registry as the guts, its just a massive
>configuration file in binary format to save some space and provide some
>control(that perhaps the file system didn't provide).
>I don't know anything about VAX, did it have a registry?
>The guts in my opinion are the kernel and drivers that make up the system.
>
>  
>
>>I don't know why but I need to know the lowest levels of the OS first 
>>and learn up.  I also need to learn from the desktop down at the same 
>>time.  It works for me.
>>    
>>
>
>I've found that once you get used to it, the unix file system is logically
>organized.  You can easily distinguish the various components and work with
>them.  I can't say the same for the Windows system.
>It seems to change from year to year, today its tele-tuby land with "My
>music" and My programs", tommorrow it will be something else ("Our musac"
>and "Our Video", with "Your digital rights management").
>
>NT/XP is an improvement over 95/98.  I kinda wonder if people will find a
>way to hose it up as bad as 95/98.  You know, your neighbor says, hey my
>computer is running really slow and crappy and has all these pop-ups.  Then
>you have to go run msconfig and turn off dozens of useless "in your face"
>crapware that has accumulated.
>Hmm, I think I coined a new term here, "crapware". :)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org
>tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list