-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 04 July 2003 01:30, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:48:46PM -0500, David Phillips wrote: > > This is yet another reason why Reply-To munging is bad. > > Hi! > > Piss off! > > =) > > > -- > > David Phillips <david at acz.org> > > http://david.acz.org/ For the record, poptix, this is IMHO the single least useful message I've seen posted to the TCLUG list in the three years or so I've lurked here. I realize that it is highly unlikely that airing my grievance in this public forum will cause you to give any thought to how you might have made this message more useful (e.g., perhaps given some sort of argument in favor of reply-to munging, or even an example of how you find it useful). But maybe it will help someone else to pause and count ten before clicking the 'Send' button. In conclusion, I would just like to say: signal good! Noise bad! - -- Chris Johnson Bidler cbidler at innominatus.com GPG key ID: 0F1FB96B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Bc7Wbb5/ug8fuWsRAnJmAKCKBwjih9ENF36eAdBM9Ih9ZOg2ggCfXJyd 6/ET6OiBXU87pLVvvWR4k2Q= =apyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list