On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:14:41AM -0500, Tom Penney wrote: > On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 09:24, Florin Iucha wrote: > > It either a lie or a 'lie'. If they meant something else, they could > > have said it. It would not have been as catcy-sounding though... > > You are correct. The could have said something else. It's obviously and > outright lie. What a bastard. They are terribly wrong for using such > misleading language. I guess my point is if you want to find out what > they "should" have said, contact them and ask. Perhaps it is an awefull > lot of band width, perhaps it is a good deal. If you you would rather > not do business with someone with such atrocious moral character as to > make such a claim then don't. Unfortunately this "qualified truth" became the norm a long time ago: "Our stuff is the best", "Second pair is free"... > I just thought I should jump in and defend > my buddy, he's not a bad guy. I never claimed, or even thought that. Even if the wrote that particular piece of text 8^) I know he was just doing his job... florin -- "NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030514/b6f62611/attachment.pgp