On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 04:26:05 -0500 "Matthew S. Hallacy" <poptix at techmonkeys.org> wrote: > > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html > > http://www.taugh.com./mp/lmap.html > > > Wow, it's the same qmail zealot (J Pollard) spewing the same garbage. Here's another one, from someone that used to maintain a sendmail FAQ - not sure if it offers anything new that the other links don't, haven't read each in their entirity yet: http://bradknowles.typepad.com/considered_harmful/2004/05/spf.html Not saying I agree with the SPF considered harmful folken, but they are not all "qmail zealots". > Obviously we should all be running qmail. Run whatever works for you. Josh _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list