SpamAssassin give the message a DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX penalty for this, FYI. It's strange, but shouldnt the mailing-list software take care of this? Or is `Date:' not a standard message header? On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Ben Bargabus wrote: > Silly training room machines, wrong dates and locked out of admin rights > to change it. (ARG!) > Ben. > > Josh Truwtin wrote: > > >On Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:28:01 -0700 > >"Ben Bargabus" <ben_b at ppdonline.com> wrote: > > > > > >>Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:28:01 -0700 > >> > > ^^^^ > > > >Ben, check your sys date... > > > >Josh > > > >_______________________________________________ > >TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > >http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > >https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Andrei Bazhgin www.nan2d.com _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list