-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
you've tossed all your x86 hardware? you must have come to your senses
and bought a mac. congratulations! welcome to an OS that doesn't piss
your time and energies away and lets you solve the problems at hand.
oh, you were trolling, right.
On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:
> <feeding the troll>
>
> It's right up[down?] there with BeOS. Unfortunately I threw out all the
> hardware it supports 5 years ago.
>
> </feeding the troll>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:06:51PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>> Has anybody on this list had a chance to evaluate NetBSD 2.0 on the
>> x86
>> architecture? I am curious to see FreeBSD in turmoil and NetBSD
>> exploding onto the scene. I am especially curious to see the
>> wonderful
>> performance improvements that they have reported.
>>
>> Thanks for any information you would like to share. I am always
>> interested in performance benchmarks against Linux 2.6 and FreeBSD as
>> well.
{snipped - misc. signatures}
- --
steve ulrich sulrich at botwerks.org
PGP: 8D0B 0EE9 E700 A6CF ABA7 AE5F 4FD4 07C9 133B FAFC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCESmlT9QHyRM7+vwRAq8aAJ0SLt1q5Ci/aZZ83bB8T/UBpmWRxgCgp/5x
Zmm+9w0e+mhlkUiqcORSJpQ=
=wxV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----