Josh Trutwin wrote: >On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:46:59 -0500 >Jeremy Rosengren <jeremy at rosengren.org> wrote: > > > >>This was probably talked about ad nauseum when the change was made, >>but I missed it. >> >>Why is the TCLUG list not configured with a reply-to that sends back >>to the list? This is the only mailing list subscription I have for >>which I have to do a reply all in order to get the message back to >>the list. >> >> > >Oh boy - here we go. > >Here are two separate viewpoints: > >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > >http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > > > So it's somewhat of a purity vs. ease-of-use argument. This is the only list of the 20 (- 5-10 that I've unsubscribed from) that I subscribe to that does this, however. Are there other people on this list who subscribe to a lot of other mailing lists that are configured the way the TCLUG list is? -- jeremy p.s. I got an email from Dave Alanis saying his response was meant to be taken humorously. Sorry I misinterpreted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20050901/a12432a2/attachment-0001.htm