Mike Miller <mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> wrote: > In other words, there was no good reason to ban yahoo.com in the > first place. Except for the fact that banning Yahoo at time time worked out quite well to suppress the spambot. That actually qualifies as a "good reason" in my book. > In case I am misunderstood, I should point out that I am not using > Yahoo.com. I use Pine on Solaris, so I don't really care about the > yahoo issue but I think it is unfair and unhelpful to single out one > mail source based on a single email from 5 years ago. Then formally propose a change. Start a new thread. I'm sure we're all familiar with how voting on email lists go. Unless we actually see a formal, "Proposal: Lift Yahoo! Ban" email, we've pretty much come to the end of this conversation. And no, polls are not votes. Polls are polls. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */