On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 03:00:53PM -0500, Mike Miller wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Mr. MailingLists wrote: > > > dd if=/dev/random of=175MBFile bs=1024k count=175 > > scp 175MBFile chickenclucker:~/ > > 175MBFile 100% 175MB 35.0MB/s 00:05 > > scp -C 175MBFile chickenclucker:~/ > > 175MBFile 100% 175MB 9.7MB/s 00:18 > > > > time gzip -c 175MBFile > 175MBFile.gz > > 12.513s > > 183500800 Aug 27 11:58 175MBFile > > 183556808 Aug 27 11:58 175MBFile.gz > > > > dd if=/dev/zero of=175MBFile bs=1024k count=175 > > scp 175MBFile chickenclucker:~/ > > 175MBFile 100% 175MB 35.0MB/s 00:05 > > scp -C 175MBFile chickenclucker:~/ > > 175MBFile 100% 175MB 35.0MB/s 00:05 > > > > time gzip -c 175MBFile > 175MBFile.gz > > 0m2.552s > > 183500800 Aug 27 12:03 175MBFile > > 178393 Aug 27 12:03 175MBFile.gz > > > > Interesting results and I learned something new today (I friggan love when that happens!). > > > Me too because I don't think I've ever used dd. > > Related question: I'm pretty sure there's a way to pipe the stdout to ssh > and have it transfer to /dev/null on the other end so that you can compare > speeds for arbitrarily large transfers without making files. Anyone know? > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=4000 | ssh ... > > I think if you were to make your file much bigger, maybe several > gigabytes, you'd see a big benefit of compression. It's not a realistic > example though because your file is just the same null character repeated > a gazillion times. So, on your network, running at 250 Mbps or so, you > probably never want to use compression. > > Mike I believe that copying to /dev/null would go so quickly that it wouldn't be a valid test. I tested this on my local filesystem: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=./testfile bs=1024K count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 9.25593 s, 113 MB/s $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1024K count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.28883 s, 3.6 GB/s The difference here, IIRC, is that /dev/null is just a bit bucket that immediately and instantly discards whatever is copied to it. The speed comes from the fact that /dev/null doesn't exercise the disk in this case. -Adam