On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Dean E <dean at ripperd.com> wrote: > > > On 7/14/2010 1:20 PM, Eric F Crist wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2010, at 13:00:06, Mike Miller wrote: >> >> >>> One is Western Digital and the other is Samsung. I was having the same >>> problem with either one. Check this out: >>> >>> $ uptime >>> 12:54:24 up 224 days, 23:59, 23 users, load average: 0.10, 0.12, 0.09 >>> >>> I really want to reboot this machine, but I'm always using it for some big >>> job. Probably within the next month or two I'll shut it down, upgrade >>> some components, install Ubuntu 10.04 and bring it back up. Then I can >>> test the file transfer speed again. >>> >> *cough* >> >> ecrist at puma:~-> uptime >> 1:15PM up 787 days, 3:17, 11 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.04, 0.07 >> >> It would have 1005 more days, but our data center where this box resides had a PDU failure which knocked out half the customers. You know who you are, data center. Oh, that's a FreeBSD box, so I don't suspects many on a LUG list to see numbers that big. :P >> >> Before you all jump on me for not having it updated, it's a FreeBSD 4.11 box on a private LAN running internal software. Rest assured this box is on it's way out in the next 6 months. >> >> Anyone beat that? >> --- >> Eric Crist >> > > Not *nix, but 919 days on Cisco: > > PlymouthSNLAN>show version > ......stuff snipped.... > PlymouthSNLAN uptime is 2 years, 27 weeks, 14 hours, 18 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > > This is an 1841 at a work site. > > I would expect others have much higher uptimes on Cisco though. > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > It isn't Cisco but it is a whitebox Windows 2003 Server on a private LAN with no public services: System Uptime - 1281 day(s) 6 hour(s) 39 minute(s) Does that make this off-topic? -- Donovan Niesen