> Here's what I'm going to do. I'll give a week for anyone to chime in with a > solid vote or 3 for the status quo (not just a "I can deal with it, why > can't you?") __backed up by good reasons__. Absent that, I'll change the > list behavior. Even with it, I might change it anyway, since the current > behavior bugs the heck out of me too. Those who have trouble with the "reply-to" might not get counted :) I vote for changing it. On Tuesday 02 March 2010 2:42:23 pm Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > On 03/02 01:32 , John Trammell wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom < > > > > chrome at real-time.com> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > I also have root access to the mailing list server, so if I wanted to be > > > > > autocratic about it I could just make the change unilaterally. However, > > > I think that would be rather irresponsible. > > > > Maybe. Sometimes it's easier to ask forgiveness than get permission. > > :-) > > I know that. I do want to at least avoid the appearance of being an > autocrat; however benevolent an autocrat I might be. :) > > Here's what I'm going to do. I'll give a week for anyone to chime in with a > solid vote or 3 for the status quo (not just a "I can deal with it, why > can't you?") __backed up by good reasons__. Absent that, I'll change the > list behavior. Even with it, I might change it anyway, since the current > behavior bugs the heck out of me too. > > > > I'd really like to see a webpoll done on this. I think we used to do > > > such things on the www.tclug.org website, but that site is bit-rotted > > > so badly it's pathetic. (If anyone has any interest in cleaning it up, > > > please let me know). > > > > I'll give it a whirl. What needs to be done? > > I'll msg you privately. Mostly it just needs someone to take out some MySQL > code and fix up dead links.