Seeing as the three examples used are based on what is also more than 7-years old in tech age... (ok, 6 years, 51 weeks) I vote for the change, too. Elvedin Trnjanin wrote: > On 3/4/2010 9:44 AM, Jim Crumley wrote: > >> On Wed, March 3, 2010 6:25 pm, Mike Miller wrote: >> >> >>> More than never? And what are we going to see? I'm on a bunch of lists >>> that do Reply-To munging and we aren't having a problem. >>> >>> >> Yep. Never. Not once. >> >> >> http://archives.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/2001-September/032799.html >> http://archives.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/2001-September/031643.html >> http://archives.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/2003-March/000368.html >> >> > Even though I'm one of the examples, I'm still voting for changing the > behavior. The technical reasons for changing it are more important than > protecting people from themselves. > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >