On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Erik Mitchell wrote:

> The timing of this email adds to the comedic effect.
>
> Are we to assume that the TCLUG list is back up?

Yes, it clearly is.  I had to resend that message because it was out of 
the queue days ago.  I used the "bounce" function of Alpine, so it kept 
the date stamp from when I first sent it, 8 days ago.  It was down for 12 
days, I think.  That's not terrible, I guess, because they are hosting us 
for free and they had some kind of major system failure.

It's good to be back.  I probably have a backlog of junk for you all to 
read.

Mike



> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Mike Miller <mbmiller+l at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I guess I'm a few minutes late.  Sorry if you missed it...
>>
>> http://goo.gl/KrCM7
>>
>>
>> In Bash:
>>
>> date -d "$(date -ud "1 Jan 1970 + 15000 days")"
>>
>> That should give the proper local time for this event.
>>
>> Even better (I wrote this, so I don't know if it's the best way to do it):
>>
>> (( for i in $(seq -w 0 40) ; do echo -ne "${i}000 days before 1 Jan 1970\t"
>> ; \
>> date -d "$(date -ud "1 Jan 1970 - ${i}000 days")" ; done ) | tac ; \
>> for i in $(seq -w 40) ; do echo -ne "${i}000 days after 1 Jan 1970\t" ; \
>> date -d "$(date -ud "1 Jan 1970 + ${i}000 days")" ; done ) | \
>> perl -pe 's/^0/ / ; s/ 0000/    0/'
>>
>>
>> I'm going to try to be there for May 11, 2060, but I doubt I'll make it 
>> (8 days before my 102nd birthday).