Hey Bob-

First, you've done a great job hosting the list here, and all. So, it is
with all due respect that I mention this: Are we still on two lists, or did
the group finally decide to merge into one? I keep getting two copies of
just about everything people send to TCWUG lists, and I think that's a bit
wasteful.

Perhaps now that we have outgrown one list, this would be a perfect time to
consolidate into a single list.

Again, Bob, nothing personal to you; you've done a great service getting the
TCWUG group moving online and communicating. I just want to see if we can
put an end to seeing every message on the list twice. :)

Regards,
---Matthew Genelin---


-----Original Message-----
From: tcwug-announce-bounces at tcwug.org
[mailto:tcwug-announce-bounces at tcwug.org]On Behalf Of Bob Tanner
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: tcwug-announce at tcwug.org; tcwug-list at tcwug.org
Subject: [Tcwug-announce] Upgrading the tcwug mailing list server


#1: We have outgrown (disk space-wise) the mailing list server.

#2: I'm also tired of maintaining Red Hat 7.3 packages to keep the box up to
date and secure.

So, it's time to migrate and upgrade the tcwug-* mailing lists to a new
system.

I'll be migrating the mailing lists over to a new box (shadowknight) today
(01/18) with 80G dedicated to the archives. Solves #1.

At the same time, I'll be upgrading to Debian :-) (flame-bait?) to easy the
burden of maintaining this box. Solves #2.

I will also be turning on VERP, so some of the smtp headers will be
different,
so adjust your procmail recipes accordingly.

--
Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org>          | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax   : (952)943-8500
http://www.linuxjustworks.com             | Linux Just Works!
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42  1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288