Is TCWUG (ie, wireless user group) a dead thing or a good place for wireless topics? Chuck -----Original Message----- From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of Justin Krejci Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:33 PM To: TCLUG Mailing List Subject: Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol 72, Issue 29 It could be he meant internet (note: lowercase ' i ' ) to mean its basic term of network of networks, which could also have one or more paths to the (big ' I ') Internet. </devils advocate> A large scale wireless network is difficult to manage. Also licensed frequencies are so much better to use in terms of signal interference but they cost non-zero dollars. I am not suggesting you quit trying but it will take a serious effort (read: lots of time) to actually deploy and maintain on an ongoing basis. This project is only passively interesting to me personally but I have no problems offering up moral support and assist on any periodic troubleshooting requests sent via the list here. On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:09 -0600, Tony Yarusso wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Samael <samael.anon at gmail.com> wrote: > fcc opend up bandwidth for public use. we could make a wireless mesh > network consisting of multiple antena and start our own internet. Yes, technically you *could*, but just how much usefulness would a network with just you on it have? No access to your bank, Freenode, mn-linux.org, Google, etc. "Critical mass" and "economy of scale" are pretty important concepts here. - Tony _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota tclug-list at mn-linux.org http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list