Not to start a "my uptime is longer than yours" thread, but I don't
find this that uncommon... We've got a bunch of 4004 and 6006s out
there, running from 6.1.24 to 7.0.x, with uptimes up there...

4004:
system uptime: up 402 days, 19 hours, 11 minutes, 35 seconds

Even a paltry P130:
system uptime: up 243 days, 21 hours, 4 minutes, 17 seconds

6006:
system uptime: up 402 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes, 16 seconds

Most of the others are between 20-200 days, simply because of
(sometimes scheduled) power outages and what not... MAXen have been 
remarkably stable for us.

"Troy Settle" <troy at psknet.com> writes:

> I hope you don't mind me copying this to the list... the numbers just
> absolutely astounded me, and thought others would be interested to see
> them as well.
> 
> #sh rev
> PSK.DIAL.01 system revision:  tbixkh.m60 7.0.22
> #sh up
> system uptime: up 366 days, 4 hours, 35 minutes, 16 seconds
> 
> I'm totally amazed by this.  I've never had a Max (or any router) stay up
> for so long without issues (well, this box did have an ethernet problem
> until I put it on a switch).
> 
> Doing some checks via SNMP, I also find the following:
> 
> 4004:  265 days
> 4048:  214 days
> 6096:  314 days
> 6096:  344 days
> 
> All running 7.0.22
> 
> There are others that have been installed more recently and have uptimes
> ranging from 60-150 days.
> 
> 
> -Troy
> 
> 
> 
> ** -----Original Message-----
> ** From: PowerNet [mailto:psc5 at powersupply.net]
> ** Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 2:08 PM
> ** To: Troy Settle
> ** Subject: Re: (ASCEND) RE:
> **
> **
> ** What Software ver are you using on your 6000's?
> ** What is your uptime look like?
> **
> ** *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> **
> ** On 8/29/2000 at 1:13 PM Troy Settle wrote:
> **
> ** >Chris,
> ** >
> ** >Just about everything works with Ascends.  I've not been
> ** paying attention
> ** >myself, but heard that the chipsets have or are going to change.
> ** >
> ** >We see good performance with every real modem, LT Winmodems, and USR
> ** >Winmodems.  Rockwell winmodems seem to be a bit less stable,
> ** but haven't
> ** >really looked at them for quite some time.
> ** >
> ** >Currently, I'm dialed into a 6096 from my laptop with an LT
> ** Winmodem using
> ** >the default drivers in Windows 2000, and have a very stable 28.8/52k
> ** >connection.  (worth noting that customers dialed into this
> ** same POP often
> ** >complain about connect speeds, but I've got brand new cat5
> ** phone lines,
> ** >so...)
> ** >
> ** >-Troy
> ** >
> ** >
> ** >** -----Original Message-----
> ** >** From: owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com
> ** >** [mailto:owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of
> ** Chris Clements
> ** >** Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:03 AM
> ** >** To: ascend-users at bungi.com
> ** >** Subject:
> ** >**
> ** >**
> ** >** Ascend Gurus,
> ** >**
> ** >** 	What is the best modem brand/chipset to use with
> ** >** Ascend/Lucent MAX 4000s
> ** >** and 6000s?  Are there modem brands/chipsets that are known to
> ** >** have issues
> ** >** with the MAX series?  Any help is greatly appreciated.
> ** >**
> ** >** Regards,
> ** >** Chris Clements
> ** >**
> ** >**
> ** >** ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> ** >** To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> ** >** To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> ** >**
> ** >**
> ** >
> ** >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> ** >To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> ** >To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> **
> **
> **
> **
> **
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

-- 
Josh Howard <jrh at vicor-nb.com>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>