A follow-up from Peter Lalor: > >PPP 258 (264) > >FR 262 (268) > > That's interesting data. Thanks. > > >So it seems the old ISDN hardware of the P50 is sweating away at the > >much higher bitrate. For this scenario FR does not offer visible > >advantages regarding throughput. > > Perhaps I'm missing something, but what does a P50 have to do with this? OK I admit I didn't have a can opener handy when I got the DSLpipe but the outer appearance of it made me think it was the same hardware as a P50. Esp. when I saw the firmware interface with lots of parameters which have no meaning in a DSLpipe but in a (ISDN) P50. At least I thought it reasonable to assume that the CPU performance is of the same order of magnitude. I once ran into a CPU related performance bottleneck with a P50 (I connected it to a populated shared LAN segment for bridging...ouch). And here I see the same effects. Not that it matters much: does someone from LUCENT dare comment on this? > We use DSLPipes and Max 20s, routed, primarily FR. wonder, wonder..why do you prefer FR over PPP? Do you get better figures with FR over "real world" lines - as I don't with the 100% loss-free wire in the lab. Best regards, Wolfgang _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- B · E · N · E · I · C · K · E EDV-Beratung ________________________________________________________________________ Netzwerk-Design Remote Access und WAN-Lösungen Storage-Lösungen (RAID, libraries, NAS/SAN) COMPAQ Server und PC Windows NT Implementation und Administration Dr. Wolfgang Beneicke fon +49-6223-97 07 20 Fasanenstrasse 16, D-69251 Gaiberg (Heidelberg) fax +49-6223-97 07 21 _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>