At 03:07 PM 04/10/2004, David Pascarella wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>I'd say that 'newer is not necessarily better' in this case. The next
>rev of code for you is 9.1.x but is licensed. What is the filename your
>6096's are currently running? (e.g. tbixk.m60, tik.m60, etc.)
Hi,
Currently its the last public rev off the Ascend website. (9.0.9)
and the load says tbixkh.m60. Dont need any features much beyond IP, L2TP
and OSPF.
> The
>upper revs of 9.1.x and higher require increase flash capacity but there
>is a 'thin load' of 9.1.x that you can run without the flash upgrade.
>In any case, no one can guarantee that this upgrade will give you
>significant 'modem performance' improvements. What type of modem modules
>do you have installed?
K56-Modem 16s and one machine with the 30s.
>Have you tried running OSPF already? Is there an issue with running it
>on your current rev?
It works a little wonky (from what I am used to on PM3s and Ciscos), but I
get it to work as well as I need it to. I am not running a very
complicated topology where my terminal servers are, so its just the one
area 0 backbone.
The main thing I was hoping to get is improved modem performance if possible.
---Mike
_______________________________________________
rte-ascend mailing list
rte-ascend at lists.real-time.com
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/rte-ascend