I will pipe in that it is still 8.2 based, ESXi is no longer an option (but you can download 2.0 and upgrade to 2.1 and beyond - when the time comes). I suspect the drivers will only come out if someone writes them - or they upgrade the build to 9 (and I think there’s a reason they haven’t… I want NetGate to ship with 32GB card instead of a 4GB but they ship what pfSense has images for; grr). I have no need for built-in wireless. That’s where external multi-SSID PoE-based routers come into play. I’m going to write an interface that allows updating password for the bar, we don’t need them for the offices or retail. And I definitely don’t want it for my home (which is all Apple products anyway). The big loser is the lack of APCUPSd support. I wish I could get it to work without breaking the firewall itself. NUT is nice but not perfect. I’m still working with it to see how to properly monitor in a bigger network. It will do the job, probably better, I just have to figure it out first. On Jan 14, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Chris Frederick <cdf123 at cdf123.net> wrote: > I was running the 2.1 release, IPv6 is good for tunneling and basic setups, but it was unusable in bridged mode with an existing radvd. I think it was a firewall rule issue, but after trying for a few days, I just gave up. > > I was using a Atheros based wireless chipset that didn't have drivers until FreeBSD 9.x, and I believe pfSense is still 8.2 based. Card was recognized, but I couldn't assign addresses or bring it up. Other cards might behave nicer, just my experience. Bought a B/G card that's been running fine since then, but rebuilding with Linux will let me use the B/G/N. > > On 01/14/14 13:45, Ryan Dunlop wrote: >> I also use pfSense at home and work. At work it's virtualized (ESXi) and >> at home it's on a netgate device. Runs great on very little hardware. >> >> IPv6 has been up and running stable on 2.1 (was doable before then but now >> it's fully implemented). Wireless N is up to the BSD folks to get drivers >> set, although a B/G/N card will be recognized it won't run at N speeds. All >> the goods Erik points out and my OpenVPN tunnels stay stable forever if >> needed on very low specs. Highly suggest checking it out. >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Erik Anderson <erikerik at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Coleman <ryanjcole at me.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hmm. Can you send a link to this hardware? >>>> >>> >>> It's this one: >>> >>> http://soekris.com/products/net5501.html >>> >>> I got the -60 model, which has 256MB RAM and a 433MHz CPU. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list