Check to make sure your call is assigned to a modem and _not_ the HDLC controller! I've seen the same happen (Max 4004 and 4048) when a DS0 doesn't go to a modem slot card. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com > [mailto:owner-ascend-users at max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Dennis Duval > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:15 PM > To: ascend-users at bungi.com > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Caller receives solid high-pitch tone > > > (off-topic rant) > I wish they would set the list reply to the list address instead of the > poster address. Half the traffic on this topic (and I suspect > most topics) > end up off list, because people think they are replying to the list. I'm > guilty of doing that. And yes I know all the arguments against > doing that, > but all responses to a list posting (except personal attacks, > etc) should go > back to the list for everyone to share. It SHOULD be more difficult to > respond off-list than on-list. I've recieved about 10 replies off-list > defining CHT1 -- thank you all though. > (end rant) > > > >Channelized T1 is what I was talking about. > >Sounds like you have the same problem. > > > >Bad thing is downgrading to 6.1.7, you will need to partially > re-config the > max. > >Back up your current config before downgrading. > > > I'm not saying that this wouldn't fix the problem, and I certainly > appreciate the suggestion, but I don't see it as a practical > solution for a > new Max 6000. The whole purpose of having new equipment is to take > advantage of the software and firmware upgrades which are no longer being > provided for the EOL'd 4000 series. In addition, I have been running > version 7.2.3 for maybe a year and half at the other location on 16 T1's > which are also plain channelized T1 (CHT1 for those lovers of TLA's and > FLA's :). Those units have been totally bulletproof. Admittedly, it is a > different switch, but essentially the same type of lines. > > I'm intrigued by Suzie Ward's comment that version 9 may have some fix for > "this". I don't mind going to version 9 if I just knew what "this" is. I > don't think my problem is related to any type of overload on the telco, > because calls were coming in successfully on the WAN1 and WAN2 at the same > time all calls were failing on WAN3 and WAN4. Moving the T1's > from WAN3 and > WAN4 to a Max4000 also cleared up the problem. I'm down to only one T1 > coming into WAN1 on the new 6096 now and I am still seeing the error > messages in the radius log, but very rarely, like 1 to 4 per hour. Its > impossible to say if those error messages have the solid high-tone pitch > associated with them, but I would say it is very likely. > > Maybe its time to get a Lucent engineer on the phone. (cringing at the > thought of dealing with Lucent "support"). > > Dennis Duval > > > > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request at bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>